Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Copy of Rogerian Oral Argument Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-252284573
    147 views1 page
    This rubric evaluates presentations on a debate topic from different perspectives. It assesses the ability to clearly present the problem from both sides in an unbiased way, understand and analyze opposing arguments, take a clear position supported by evidence, address compromise, and build a unified argument toward a single goal. The levels of performance range from developing to effective, with effective being the highest level that demonstrates sophistication, thoroughness, relevance, synthesis and equal benefit to both sides.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    copy of copy of rogerian oral argument rubric

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates presentations on a debate topic from different perspectives. It assesses the ability to clearly present the problem from both sides in an unbiased way, understand and analyze opposing arguments, take a clear position supported by evidence, address compromise, and build a unified argument toward a single goal. The levels of performance range from developing to effective, with effective being the highest level that demonstrates sophistication, thoroughness, relevance, synthesis and equal benefit to both sides.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    147 views1 page

    Copy of Rogerian Oral Argument Rubric

    Uploaded by

    api-252284573
    This rubric evaluates presentations on a debate topic from different perspectives. It assesses the ability to clearly present the problem from both sides in an unbiased way, understand and analyze opposing arguments, take a clear position supported by evidence, address compromise, and build a unified argument toward a single goal. The levels of performance range from developing to effective, with effective being the highest level that demonstrates sophistication, thoroughness, relevance, synthesis and equal benefit to both sides.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Name:

    RUBRIC 40 points-Speaking and Listening

    Topic: Side:
    GOAL D WEAK NEEDS SOME WORK GOOD EFFECTIVE
    N
    A

    Articulation of the problem to be solved Presents an Attempts to present the Presents the Presents the problems of both
    introduction similar problem, but struggles problems of both positions in a well-developed,
    to the 5 paragraph to remain unbiased. positions in an unbiased way.
    model (AKA very unbiased way.
    biased)

    Understanding and treatment of Attempts to analyze Presents a limited Analyzes the Analyzes the opposition’s
    opposition’s values, goals, and arguments the opposition’s analysis of the opposition’s argument argument and reasoning,
    argument, but it is opposition’s argument. and reasoning, demonstrating a sophisticated,
    oversimplified or demonstrating a thorough understanding.
    erroneous. sufficient
    understanding.

    A clear position statement that articulates Presents a position, Presents a position, but Transitions to a clear Logically transitions to a clear
    what the group wants but thesis is unclear thesis is unclear OR position (thesis). position (thesis).
    AND transition is transition is clunky.
    clunky.

    Reasoning/ substantiation that makes the Provides reasoning Provides reasoning with Provides organized Provides organized reasoning
    case for the group’s demands that lacks limited or unreliable reasoning with valid with the most relevant and
    organization and textual evidence for textual evidence for valid textual evidence for
    sufficient support. support. support. Sources are also
    development. synthesized to deepen
    analysis.

    Willingness to compromise so that both Attempted to Addresses a Addresses a Addresses a compromise that
    “teams” feel that they are getting address a compromise that compromise that benefits both sides equally,
    something they want compromise, but it benefits one side more benefits both sides. providing a detailed
    is limited and heavily than the other. explanation of the solutions
    argumentative. involved.

    A unified argument that builds to a single Argument is unclear Argument is present but Argument is unified Argument is unified and builds
    goal and/or does not inconsistent, making it and builds to a single to a single goal. Each section
    follow the Rogerian difficult to follow. goal. Each section flows to the next in a way that
    style. flows to the next. helps the audience understand
    the position.

    Comments:

    You might also like