Dissertation PDF
Dissertation PDF
AND OTHERS
December 2005
APPROVED:
of Musical Intention and Design in 30 Capricen für Flöte allein ,Opus 107 by Sigfrid Karg-Elert,
with Three Recitals of Selected Works by Schulhoff, Telemann, Berio, Bach, Rodrigo,
Gieseking, Reinecke, and Others. Doctor of Musical Arts (Performance), December 2005, 149
Flöte allein, Opus 107: Ein “Gradus ad Parnassum” der modernen Technik, Nebst einem
Caprices For Flute Solo, Opus 107: A “Steps to Parnassus” of the modern technique, with a
history, and an overview of creative output. Inception of the caprices as the result of a need for
orchestral music is discussed. Analytical discussion of each caprice considers tonal language,
voice-leading, rhythm, motive, and form to demonstrate the collection’s summation of past
musical style together with the progressive features used to define the changing musical aesthetic
in early twentieth-century Germany. The caprices stand today as technical and musically
substantive works worthy of performance as solo literature. A translation of German and Italian
terms, list of Possible Erata in the caprices, list of Karg-Elert’s compositions using the flute in a
primary role, and the Preface and appendix from 30 Capricen für Flöte allein, Opus 107 are
included as appendices.
Copyright 2005
by
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE ..................................................................................................................................... 1
Chapter
iii
6. PERFORMANCE SUGGESTIONS................................................................. 114
CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................... 117
Appendices
BIBLIOGRAPHY..................................................................................................................... 147
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
v
LIST OF MUSICAL EXAMPLES
Page
10. Caprice #8, measures 9-10, atypical interval sequence and phrase shape...................... 47
11. Caprice #8, measures 14-20, whole tone and augmented construction.......................... 48
14. Caprice #10, measures 1-11, harmonic groupings creating hemiola, suggesting 6/16
meter (triangles indicate pulse)....................................................................................... 52
15. Caprice #10, measures 13-17, rapid slurred passages between registers. ...................... 53
19. Caprice #13, measures 1-4, instructional notation, motives X and Y. ........................... 61
vi
23. Caprice #15, measure 3-4, mirrored voices, sharing pitch contour................................ 66
25. Caprice #16, measure 4, humorous motive created by hemiola and grace notes........... 67
30. Caprice #18, compositional design inspired by idiomatic violin and piano technique. . 74
32. Caprice #19, measures 36-39, modern (tritone and diminished) construction, assisting
notation. .......................................................................................................................... 78
34. Caprice #21, mm. 26-29, waltz with hemiola (diamonds indicate pulse). ..................... 84
40. Caprice #24, measures 30-33, chromatic and scalar lines across sevenths. ................... 94
vii
48. Caprice #26, measure 12, motive T................................................................................ 99
51. Caprice #27, measures 10-14, motive X including sequence of fourths. ..................... 100
52. Caprice #27, measures 21-24, tritone background progression. .................................. 101
53. Caprice #27, measures 6-9, undermined 9/8 meter. ..................................................... 101
viii
PREFACE
In 1919 Sigfrid Karg-Elert completed 30 Capricen Für Flöte allein, Opus 107:
flutists with a collection of pieces written to connect existing technical flute literature to
the progressive demands of contemporary orchestral music. Since their publication, the
caprices have held an important place in flute repertoire of the twentieth century;
aesthetic of the early twentieth century is lacking. The purpose of this dissertation is to
1) place the caprices within their historical context; 2) detail how Karg-Elert’s Caprices
for Flute Solo provide the flutist with a summary of musical material from the baroque to
early twentieth century and then subsequently point towards future techniques and ideas;
3) present the caprices as musically substantive works capable of functioning as solo flute
pieces; and 4) provide the flute teacher and performer with an analysis and explanation of
1
English translation: 30 Caprices For Flute Solo, Opus 107: A “Gradus ad Parnassum” of the Modern
Technique, With a theoretical practical Appendix, “The Logical development of modern figuration.”From
this point forward, the English translation will be used in this text.
1
CHAPTER 1
Siegfried Theodor Karg was born to Johann Baptist Karg (1823-1889) and Marie
youngest of twelve children, six of whom died before he was born, Sigfrid4 and his
family lived in poverty and moved frequently. His father was said to possess a Dionysian
honorable sincerity; strongly inclined to persevere; looking out for the humorous and the
grotesque.”5 Johann Baptist worked for various newspapers throughout his life before
going insane, dying in 1889. With character in stark contrast to that of his father,
Sigfrid’s mother was said to have passed to Sigfrid her, “tenacity, reticence, absolute
truthfulness, great warmth and certain conservative traits.”6 Her devout Lutheran faith
contrasted with his father’s Roman Catholicism. Sigfrid was greatly influenced by both
parents and struggled to reconcile the two parts of his nature throughout his life.
2
Most biographical information on Sigfrid Karg-Elert traces back to one source: Paul Schenk, Sigfrid
Karg-Elert: eine monographische Skizze mit vollstandigem Werkverzeichnis, Leipzig (Radelli & Hille,
commissioned by Carol Simon, Berlin), 1927. While this source was unavailable as of publication, it
necessitates mention as it served as the primary source for the works that have been accessible to the author
of this dissertation.
3
Ralf Kaupenjohann, Trans. Harold Fabrikant, “Biography,” Sigfrid Karg-Elert (1877-1933)
(Twickenham, UK: Karg-Elert Archive, 2003), 1.
4
Changes in the composer’s name are discussed later in chapter 1.
5
Ibid.
6
Ibid.
2
In 1930, an article appeared in The Daily Herald newspaper while Karg-Elert was in
Sigfrid was not the only sibling to struggle with the dual ‘Karg-Elert’ nature. Sister Else,
an opera singer trained at Leipzig Conservatory, committed suicide after her conservative
pitch and a beautiful voice, and excelled in mathematics. His family moved to Leipzig,
where Bruno Roethig, cantor at Johanneskirche, recognized his talent. By the age of
twelve, a number of Sigfrid’s sacred works were performed and subsequent musical
training was arranged. 9 This training was interrupted as his guardian, who intended that
Karg become a schoolteacher, sent him away to a Teacher’s Seminary, where he was
forbidden to study piano. At 16, Karg ran away from the school to Leipzig with only a
7
Harold Fabrikant, Godfrey Sceats and Harold Fabrikant, trans., Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend:
Sigfrid Karg-Elert’s Letters to Godfrey Sceats 1922-1931 (Caulfield, Victoria 3162, Australia: Dr. Harold
Fabrikant, 2000), A21-22.
8
Kaupenjohann, 6.
9
These early works were composed without a piano. A Leipzig family later provided Sigfrid with a table-
piano.
3
clarinet and his scores.10 Procuring a job in the Markranstädt windband, he was given an
oboe and taught himself to play, befriending oboist Alfred Jochade in the process.
Jochade later perished as an orchestra member aboard the Titanic, prompting Karg-
Elert’s six versions on the hymn “Nearer, My God, To Thee,” the tune said to have been
played on the ship as it sank.11 Viola, music theory, philosophy, and science were other
himself (and to help his mother), he took a job at the Magdeburg Conservatory, where the
first of two changes occurred in his name. His mother’s maiden name, Elert, was added
to his surname at the recommendation of the faculty. 13 Grieg later suggested that he spell
‘Siegfrid without the e’s to appear less Jewish and more Nordic. 14 This suggestion
accurately predicted a problem Karg-Elert would face throughout his life – his perception
10
Kaupenjohann, 2.
11
Kaupenjohann, 8. (One version, Canzona Op. 81 is scored for flute obbligato, soloists, choir, and organ,
published in 1912.)
12
von Reznick was Court Music Director at Mannheim and was in Leipzig for a performance of his opera,
Donna Diana.
13
The ‘h’ in ‘Ehlert’ was omitted from this time forward.
14
Harold Fabrikant, comp., The Harmony of the Soul: Sigfrid Karg-Elert’s Letters “To His Australian
Friends,” (Lenswood, South Australia: Academy Press, 1966), 11.
15
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, 39.
4
Karg-Elert also worked as a pianist in cafes in Leipzig, but, embarrassed to be
seen in this role, disguised himself by wearing a mask and fake-beard. The decision to
focus on composition over a piano performance career was encouraged by Edvard Grieg
It was the Carl Simon Publishing Company of Berlin that encouraged Karg-Elert
to compose for harmonium, commissioning works and concerts for the instrument that
had been installed in their concert hall during its brief popularity in the early 1900’s.17
Finding the harmonium’s capacity for varied tone color, expressiveness, and mechanical
perfection suitable to his musical aesthetic, Karg-Elert went on to compose over one
hundred works for the instrument between 1903-1915.18 Max Reger (1873-1916),
premiere German organist of the time, encouraged Karg-Elert to expand his keyboard
repertoire to include the organ, inspiring several compositions before World War One.
Joining the 107th Infantry Regiment, Karg-Elert was placed into an excellent
ensemble as an oboist instead of being deployed to the front.19 His three and a half years
ample time to compose and learn various instruments for which he would later compose,
including the flute, oboe, saxophone, horn, lyre, and clarinet. Influenced by the
16
Ibid, A-12.
17
Fabrikant, Harmony of the Soul, 11.
18
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, A-13.
19
While sources refer to the ensemble as a military band, it was actually an orchestra as revealed in the
next quote of the text.
5
repertoire he was performing, the composer underwent a serious change in style reflected
At many a rehearsal I learnt more than I could learn at my desk at home in six
months. Serving in the orchestra, I lost my anaemic aestheticism and forgot
the high-flown overheated theses of the Schönberg school and the Scriabin
circle, which were threatening me dangerously, and under the spell of which
for the past two years it seemed that I had fallen beyond hope of salvation.
Having previously shunned all music except that of Schönberg, Debussy, and
the later Scriabin, my nerves and ‘inner ear’ having become greatly over-
excited, I now had to endure for hours the Third, Fifth and Seventh
Symphonies of Beethoven, the Tragic Overture or Violin Concerto of Brahms,
Bach’s Brandenburg Concerto in D major (in which I played the pianoforte
part), the heavenly B minor Symphony of Schubert and the incomparable
Fingal’s Cave Overture of Mendelssohn. And this art was stronger than my
fanatical love for these three ‘left’ radicals. After two years of boredom I
discovered anew the purity and soulful contents of classical and romantic art,
and found an inexpressible happiness which exalted me above all else. How
good it was to feel that unfruitful artistic gluttony and agreement with those
who were for the time being in the fashion, had not quite stifled within me the
naïve musician which at the bottom of my heart I had always remained.
Mountains of puzzling and mad music for the pianoforte, fragile and intricate
enigmas for orchestra, baseless pseudo-songs and dangerously entangled
organ experiments found their way into the fire on the day that I made this
discovery. Then I started again in C major and prayed to the muse of
melody.20
…he was hardly the type of man one normally associates with a position
of special responsibility in the world of scholarship, for he was lacking, at
times, in dignity and seriousness… He was highly sensitive and may not
have always have been able to help his erratic temperament, but his
20
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, A 13-14.
21
Norman M. Heim, “The Clarinet Sonatas of Sigfrid Karg-Elert,” NACWPI Journal (Fall 1997): 3.
6
frequent outbursts of bad temper and clownish behavior were painful to
his many friends.22
Despite his character, he was a highly respected professor whom students held in high
His pupils at the Conservatoire are devoted to him by reason of his unique
artistic, scientific, educational and human qualities. His innate power of
entering readily into the spirit of any style of composition and his
understandings of the most widely diversified technical possibilities in the
various instruments, together with his immense knowledge, unite to make
him a teacher of composition who is at once proof against any tendency to
one-sidedness and unrivalled for the individuality of instruction. Those
who have been fortunate enough to be his pupils have been astonished at
his unselfishness and almost superhuman energy.23
composer in Germany, only discovering ample respect and recognition for his organ and
harmonium works abroad in England and the United States.24 Complaining of his
…but my own countrymen are so often ignorant of the fact that I have
written “something’ for the organ. Indeed, at our own splendid Institute
for Church Music (attached to the Conservatorium, at which I myself work
as Professor of Composition!!) no one knows the slightest thing from me
as an organ-composer… That is the state of things at the place in which I
have worked for many years! In Germany there are only two organ
masters, Bach and Reger… All else is air, wind, chaff, dust…25
22
Godfrey Sceats, The Organ Works of Karg-Elert, (London: Hinrichsen Edition Ltd., 1950), 7.
23
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, A-14.
24
Young, 7.
25
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, 2.
7
Godfrey Sceats initiated a two-week Karg-Elert festival in London from May 5-17, 1930
that was very well received. A much anticipated but less-successful tour of organ recitals
in the United States (1932) proved to be one of his last professional endeavors.26
Following this tour, his deteriorating health worsened and Karg-Elert died on Palm
Sunday, April 9, 1933. Diabetes, neurasthenia, and heart failure had been ongoing health
Since his death in 1933, Karg-Elert has gradually received the recognition many
feel is long overdue, considering his obvious talent and large musical output. Clearly the
“chapter” expected by the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik has begun and, particularly for wind
interested in the organ and harmonium compositions (Godfrey Sceats, among others).
The work of Harold Fabrikant (Australia), also inspired by appreciation of the organ
literature, has been invaluable to Karg-Elert research as he has compiled and translated
26
Stephen Edward Young, “The Organ Works of Sigfrid Karg-Elert (1877-1933)” (Ph.D. Diss., University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1968), 9-10. Performances were given in the following cities: New York,
Washington, Boston, Montreal, Toronto, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Chicago, Minneapolis, Dallas, San
Francisco.
27
Kaupenjohann, 5.
28
Young, 11.
8
much correspondence between Karg-Elert, Sceats, and other “Australian friends.”29 The
Although several small articles have appeared in various trade journals, musicians
studying Karg-Elert’s wind compositions have not pursued research with equal fervor;
substantial analytical study is yet to be published. Alwin Wollinger’s book on the flute
compositions stands as the only prominent exception, yet even this work is lacking
complete theoretical analyses.31 For the most part, much of Karg-Elert’s wind music is
29
Many thanks to Dr. Fabrikant for providing these valuable source materials. See bibliography.
30
Many thanks to Anthony Caldicott of the Karg-Elert Archive for assisting in the location of source
material.
31
Die Flötenkompositionen von Sigfrid Karg-Elert (1877-1933) by Alwin Wollinger.
32
Heim, 3.
9
CHAPTER 2
The Harmonium
Over one hundred works for harmonium33 composed between 1903 and 1914
comprise the majority of the early output of Sigfrid Karg-Elert. The qualities of the
instrument had a large impact on the composer’s musical aesthetic, inspiring dramatic
expression and use of varied tone color, regardless of instrumentation. Of the harmonium
Karg-Elert said,
His first published work, Skizzen, op. 10 (1903)35 for harmonium was followed by several
larger-scaled works for the same instrument including two sonatas. Other significant
compositions are Idyllen, op.104 (1914), noteworthy for its atonality and expressionist
33
The harmonium is a keyboard instrument, first developed in the early 1800’s, whose pedal-operated
bellows and reeds produce an organ-like sound. Stops above the keyboard control which reeds are
employed to create various timbres.
34
Frank Conely, 'Karg-Elert, Sigfrid', Grove Music Online ed. L. Macy (Accessed 25 May 2005),
<http://www.grovemusic.com>.
35
Translation: Sketches
10
style, and Portraits, op. 101 (1913-1923), a collection of works imitating various
historical styles.
The Organ
for the organ by adapting early harmonium works.36 Recognized today primarily for his
arguably his best and most well-known works; their value places the composer alongside
composition.37 Composed with specific forms in mind and strictly adhered to within each
The collection was composed with the composer’s religious devotion in mind and of its
It was at this time that I experienced the most exalted hours of my life, as
the enormous force of the inexpressible majestic language of the Bible and
of the terse and almost overpowering verses of our Lutheran hymns were
borne in upon me. I heeded not whether it was morning, mid-day, evening
or night, I read again and again the Old and New Testaments and our
hymns, and composed without ceasing for an entire year.39
36
Sceats, The Organ Works, 9.
37
Ibid, 18.
38
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, A-2.
39
Ibid, 40.
11
Pastels from the Lake of Constance, op. 96 (1921) and Cathedral Windows, op. 106
(1923) are other significant organ works, noteworthy for their Impressionist style.
Other Works
standard repertoire for its respective instrumentation. Ironically, Karg-Elert’s works for
piano are relatively unknown; he was a pianist by training and early profession, not an
organist as his output might suggest. The works for wind instruments, particularly those
he had performing knowledge of, are becoming established in repertory of the respective
instruments. Several works were composed with the flute in a primary role. (See
music, with styles from the baroque to the modern represented in small forms, longer
Manuscripts for several flute works mentioned by the composer have never been
located with speculation that some of these works may never have been composed, as
Karg-Elert often listed works as finished when either not complete or even begun. 40 The
Preface to the Caprices mentions several of these missing works for flute: Etchings,
Partita, a Concerto and Monologues. The Concerto was mentioned in a letter from the
40
These works are not included in Appendix E.
12
Concerto for Flute and orchestra (not yet finished), 30 Caprices, a long Chaconne, a
The method of composition in the Caprices for flute reveals a close connection to
other repertoire Karg-Elert produced during his career, both for other wind instruments
and for keyboard. Similar to the flute Caprices, Portraits ‘von Palestrina bis
amalgam of musical styles. Titles or subtitles in Opus 101 include “Alla Palestrina,”
“Alla Schönberg” and other pieces in the collection reference Händel, Bach, Grieg,
Brahms, Chopin, Reger, and Scriabin. 42 Caprice #5, Allegro alla Händel, shares a
similar title and reference to the 1914 work for organ, Homage to Händel, op. 75/2.43
Sharing genre with the Caprices for flute are 25 Capricen, op.153, for alto saxophone
(1929) and 3 Caprices, op.16 for four hands [piano] (1900). By including a Chaconne,
Caprice #30, Karg-Elert unites Opus 107 with the many works of this ostinato form in his
oeuvre that pay homage to the period of music history so foundational to his
development, along with those who historically defined it, namely, Johann Sebastian
Bach. Karg-Elert’s Passacaglia and Fugue on BACH, op. 150 (1931) for organ (based
on an earlier op. 46 work for harmonium) is one of his most well known compositions.
41
Sceats, The Organ Works, 43. This letter is dated June 12, 1929.
42
Sceats, The Organ Works, 15-16.
43
While there is no indication of particular respect or affinity for Handel in Karg-Elert’s writings or
history, perhaps he recognized Handel (with sympathy) as another German composer who at times fared
better musically in England than in his home country.
13
Compositional Style
Baroque and Classical imitation, the expressive German romantic heritage of Brahms and
Wagner, Impressionist style of contemporary French composers, and also the style of his
contemporary ‘modern’ peers, Schönberg and Scriabin. He was known to be torn by his
aesthetic preferences and traced his varied styles, outwardly conflicting in nature, to the
time, largely falling in line with the stylistic expressiveness of the German romantic
44
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, A10.
14
traditions to which he was heir. 45 The New Groves Dictionary describes the composer’s
style, “a warmly chromatic musical language featuring lush harmonies and complex key
relationships.”46 Tonal direction and functional harmony are present yet undermined by
the chromaticism and modern chords used within. Karg-Elert’s best works,
was criticized for this conservative style, prompting the following statement,
Novelty is not identical with progress; and often the feverish impulse to be
at all costs original and different from others is dearly bought at the
expense of genuineness, truth and warmth of soul.47
Clearly, modern elements employed by Karg-Elert were chosen carefully, with intentions
45
Young, 142.
46
Conley, online.
47
Fabrikant, Your Ever Grateful, Devoted Friend, A9.
15
CHAPTER 3
Inspiration
During his WWI tenure as an oboist in a military band of the 107th Infantry
Regiment, Karg-Elert became acquainted with Carl Bartuźat (1882-1959), the eminent
Schwedler in Leipzig,49 Bartuźat discussed with Karg-Elert the need for a link between
existing technical repertoire for the flute and the new demands of modern orchestral
works, inspiring the composer to write 30 Caprices for Flute Solo, Opus 107.50
Developing a lasting friendship during military service, Karg-Elert later dedicated the
Sonate B dur, Opus 121 to Bartuźat. In his Preface to the Caprices, Karg-Elert discusses
the natural progression of musical technique occurring as the result of three main forces:
the skill of the virtuoso (of physical nature), the desire of the composer to express
something new (of aesthetic nature), and the improvement of the instrument itself by the
48
Ronald Waln, “The Karg-Elert Legacy,” Flute Talk (November 1997): 18.
49
Alwin Wollinger, Die Flötenkompositionen von Sigfrid Karg-Elert (1877-1933), (Frankfurt am Main:
Haag und Herchen, 1991), 20-21.
50
Sigfrid Karg-Elert, 30 Capricen für Flöte allein: Opus 107 : ein "Gradus ad Parnassum" der modernen
Technik, nebst einem praktisch-theoretischen Anhang, "Die logische Entwicklung der modernen
Figuration," Trans. Mrs. R.H. Elkin (Huntsville, TX.: Recital Publications, 2000), 3.
51
Ibid, 2.
16
Bartuźat’s expertise and virtuosity was the physical inspiration for what Karg-Elert
Gradus ad Parnassum
Elert’s 30 Capricen Für Flöte allein, Opus 107 refers both to the sacred mountain where
Apollo and the muses reside and to the 1725 counterpoint treatise of Johann Joseph Fux
that first used the Gradus ad Parnassum title. Karg-Elert’s choice is fitting for two
earlier era (Palestrina, etc.), and his ideas were then studied by composers of the classical,
romantic, and modern eras (Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Brahms, Strauss, and Hindemith
[and likely Karg-Elert]) 52. As the basis to their development, Fux was said to have
helped “[lay] the foundation for a classical Viennese style,”53 and his work served as a
analogous, albeit more comprehensive, role in the Preface to his Caprices when he states
his goal to synthesize past styles from the Baroque to the present and compose in a way
Caprices take the classical technique of Bach, Händel, and Mozart as their starting point
and pass rapidly to the style of today,” and “the Caprices explore new and untrodden
paths in technique: a technique which may be required from one day to another in some
52
Alfred Mann, trans. and ed, The Study of Counterpoint from Johann Joseph Fux’s Gradus ad Parnassum
(New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1971), xi-xiv.
53
Ibid, xi.
54
This tendency to compose sets of works with a broad stylistic scope is also evident in his organ work
Portraits ‘von Palestrina bis Schoenberg,’ 33 Pieces, op. 101 (1913-23).
17
new impressionistic or expressionistic work.” 55 Secondly, the tone and purpose of Fux’s
musical composition between Aloysius (Palestrina, teacher) and Josephus (the aspiring
student) as in Fux’s work, Karg-Elert’s Opus 107 includes two expository sections
directed to the flutist that guide understanding of issues surrounding compositional intent
(Preface) and design (Appendix). The Preface defines inspiration and purpose, and the
various harmonic and melodic figurations derived from harmonies of the twentieth
century. Karg-Elert was not the first composer to borrow the Gradus ad Parnassum title
nor were the flute Caprices his only use of this reference. 56 Muzio Clementi incorporated
the subtitle Gradus ad Parnassum in his three volumes of piano etudes, Opus 4457; it is
Written in 1919 at the completion of Opus 107, the Preface provides the flutist
with a statement of musical intent and purpose not duplicated in technical repertoire for
the flute. A historical discussion reveals the Caprices unique approach to technical
55
Karg-Elert, 2-3.
56
Karg-Elert composed Gradus ad Parnassum, op. 95 (1912-14) for organ.
57
Don Michael Randel, ed., The New Harvard Dictionary of Music, (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard
UP, 1986), 345. These works were composed in 1817, 1819, and 1826.
18
Korngold, Schreker, Scrjabin, and Strawinsky). 58 Recognition of the flute’s changing
role in orchestral music and the progress afforded by advances in mechanical design,
Karg-Elert sets forth a mission to extend the language of the flute by challenging the
the part of the composer, the instrument would scarcely have reached so high a degree of
perfection…The ‘difficult’ will always grow easy by overcoming the ‘more difficult.’”59
Theoretical analysis in the Appendix evidences that the Caprices surpass other
The instrumentalist who does not intend to be led blindfold from one note
to the other but wishes to conceive the figures as a logically and
organically constructed whole, must first of all recognize the harmonic
function of a series of notes. Without a knowledge of harmony he will not
succeed in grasping the correlation between the different single notes.60
In addition to harmonic awareness, Karg-Elert notes that a “rapid mental grasp of the
formal structure, and an instantaneous grouping (as regards harmony, phrasings and
melodic and harmonic patterns (a triad, scale, etc.) but quickly focuses on harmonic
characteristics of his time, explaining how certain basic scales, chords, or intervals are
58
Karg-Elert, 2.
59
Karg-Elert, 2-3.
60
Ibid, 26.
61
Ibid, 2.
62
It is unknown whether the Appendix was written with specific reference to the Caprices for flute.
19
developed into complex melodic and harmonic constructs. The avoidance of the fifth, in
favor of third relations, tritones, or whole tone scale segments,63 and chromatic passages
chords in a whole tone system, with the large quantity of arpeggiated chords available as
and notes of harmonic background importance are signaled by the use of various symbols
throughout the Appendix, including brackets, x’s, circles, and accent marks. 66 Karg-Elert
author believes herewith to have given hints which should cover all the possible
written for didactic purpose can be traced to J.S. Bach’s works composed for the
instruction of his son, Wilhelm Friedemann Bach. Since that time, when categorization
of pedogogical vs. performance repertoire was minimal if not non-existent, several major
composers have contributed works that form a quasi-genre, the concert etude. The New
Groves Dictionary defines this type of work as a “concert study,” a composition that
63
Karg-Elert, 30.
64
Ibid, 33-35.
65
Ibid, 35.
66
The text of this Appendix is included as Appendix F of this document.
67
Ibid, 35.
20
“attempts to combine the utility of a technical exercise with musical invention equivalent
Beginning in the early nineteenth century, the most noteworthy examples have
come from piano or string repertoire including Frédéric Chopin’s (1810-1849) piano
1837), and Three New Etudes (1840) were the first etude collections to establish
Transcendental Studies (based on Etude en douze exercises) and later, the Grandes
analogous position in violin repertoire, becoming popular concert pieces that inspired the
twentieth century concert etude examples are Alexander Scriabin’s (1872-1915) Etudes
(op’s. 8, 42, 65, 2, 49, and 56), Sergei Rachmaninoff’s (1873-1943) Etudes-Tableaux
Whether or not these pieces had direct influence on Karg-Elert’s Caprices for
flute, they share certain characteristics of form, tonal language, rhythmic complexity, and
68
Howard Ferguson and Kenneth L. Hamilton, 'etude', Grove Music Online ed. L. Macy (Accessed 25
May 2005), <http://www.grovemusic.com>.
69
Ibid.
70
Jacob Joseph Surdell, “Tonality, Form and Stylistic Features in Sergei Rachmininoff’s ‘Etude-
Tableaux,’ Op. 39.” (DMA Diss., University of Texas at Austin, 1992).
71
Ferguson and Hamilton, online.
21
genre-typical virtuosity.72 The simple binary or ternary forms of Chopin and Scriabin’s
several early Caprices for flute by Karg-Elert. Other caprices towards the end of the
collection, more developmental in nature, are reminiscent of forms used by Liszt, where
shape is created by the use of continuously evolving thematic and motivic material. 73
Karg-Elert’s Caprice #30: Chaconne is a longer piece, utilizing variation form placed
across a binary structure, revealing formal complexity similar to that present in the more
The tonal language of Karg-Elert’s Caprices varies with the period of music
history imitated; however, their modern reputation was established largely by the late-
nineteenth and early twentieth century tonal idioms used in the latter caprices (and
discussed in the Appendix). These caprices display marked similarities with the tonal
language used in the Rachmaninoff, Liszt, Scriabin, and Chopin concert etudes, utilizing
rapidly changing harmonies, slightly varied or fragmented melodic material, and use of
sequential passages to create tonal instability. 74 While most of the Caprices contain an
72
New Groves Dictionary of Music and Musicians states that Karg-Elert was “strongly influenced” by
Debussy and Scriabin in the general sense.
73
Surdell, 23.
74
Surdell, 8-17.
75
Surdell, 17. Scriabin’s Three Etudes, Op. 65 (1911-1912) are described as “nearly atonal.”
22
CHAPTER 4
Literature For the Flute describes the Caprices as “short, modern etudes,” including them
in the Daily Exercises, Etudes, and Methods section.76 Nancy Toff’s The Flute Book,
another repertoire catalog, lists the collection in the Technical Exercises and Études
section;77 however, Toff recognizes the greater musical value of the Caprices when she
with the kind of style and expression to which Altès referred as for technical practice.”78
this dissertation is to demonstrate the Caprices as expressive musical works with definite
Several collections of caprices exist in flute repertoire, composed both before and
after Karg-Elert’s Opus 107 (see Appendix A), but only a few are prominent in today’s
76
James, J. Pellerite, A Handbook of Literature For the Flute, (Bloomington, Indiana: Zalo Publications,
1963), 22.
77
Nancy Toff, The Flute Book, (New York: Oxford UP, 1996), 438.
78
Ibid, 132. Of technical practice, Altés said, “An exercise must always be played through as though it
belonged to a piece of music with a definite style to it.”
23
literature. The majority of the collections have been relegated to obscure status, due to
musical value. Even recognizable composers (de Lorenzo, Gariboldi, Kummer, and
Stamitz) caprices are infrequently studied. In his edition of Kummer’s Six Caprices ou
Exercices pour la Flûte seule op.12, Bernhard Päuler suggests that their neglect (along
with Kummer’s other flute works) is due to “Romanticism’s repression of the flute.”79
While the romantic period did find its expression in other solo instruments more capable
of conveying its dramatic and colorful aesthetic, the flute was not repressed; repertoire
written in a highly technical style simply was not among the most substantial musical
composition.
importance in standard repertoire of the flute. In the eighteenth century, Johann Joachim
Quantz (1697-1773) composed Capricen, Fantasien, und Anfangsstücke für Flöte solo
und mit B.c., later published as Quantz Capricen. Markings in Frederick the Great’s
document on his studies with Quantz indicate the pedagogical intent of this collection,
which includes 4 Capricio and 7 Capricie. Some pieces are intended for performance
while others were intended as teaching tools. These Caprices were said to “cover all the
technical problems of the 18th century flute music,”80 showing similarity in conception
79
Caspar Kummer, Six Caprices ou Exercices pour la Flûte seule, op. 12, (Winterthur/Schweiz : Amadeus,
1990), ii.
80
Johann JoachimQuantz, Capricen, Fantasien und Anfangsstücke für Flöte solo und mit B.c., (Winterthur:
Amadeus, 1980), 2-3.
24
The 12 Caprices for solo flute (c. 1761) of Charles Delusse (b. c.1720), published
in the flute tutor, L’art de la flûte traversière, are significant as they are said to “mark the
beginnings in France of true flute-études.”81 Delusse was a flutist in the orchestra of the
Opéra Comique, and the conclusions of his Caprices were intended to function as
cadenzas.
prominent works in the caprice genre, defined by virtuosic violin technique and early
nineteenth century style. Said to have “spawned similar sets of etude-capriccios in all
keys for other instruments,”82 the Caprices have been incorporated into standard flute
repertoire, largely as a result of transcriptions for flute by John Wummer and Jules
Hermans. Karg-Elert would certainly have approved of the flute editions of the Paganini
are standard Caprices in the flutist’s repertoire; however, the focus remains consistently
Used as advanced technical literature, Boehm’s works are significant because of his
Karg-Elert’s Caprices have a unique place within this repertoire, being the only
81
Ibid.
82
Randel, 139.
83
Karg-Elert, 3.
25
with an established academic reputation, respected for his compositions for various
repertoire and tracing of development in musical styles results in a more valuable musical
standardized Boehm flute. Considered the most valuable, early technical repertoire
written for flutists in preparation of modern musical ideas,84 this opinion is reflected by
their prominence in the repertoire. In 1919, the use of flutter-tonguing, mixed or unusual
stemmed notes and melodies based on whole-tone scales or unusual chromatics were new
concepts incorporated into technical flute pieces. Karg-Elert’s expressive tonal language,
the Caprices might still be the first time a student encounters these musical elements in
practical application.85
Karg-Elert’s Caprices can also be considered with three other twentieth century
collections of technical repertoire for the flute that stand as established flute literature.
These “concert etudes” include Harald Genzmer’s (b. 1909) Modern Studies for Flute
Vol. I, Robert Dick’s (b. 1950) Flying lessons: six contemporary concert etudes for flute
84
Ronald Waln, “Sigfrid Karg-Elert’s Works for Wind Instruments,” NACWPI Journal (Summer 1997):
21.
85
It should be noted that the Caprices are not a collection of post-tonal pieces employing what we now
refer to as extended techniques.
26
(1984), and Eugène Bozza’s (1905-1991) 14 Études Arabesques. Genzmer was a student
description of his Modern Studies reveals similarity with Karg-Elert’s Caprices, “[They
more than technically; some will require concentrated rhythmic study.”87 Bozza’s Études
Arabesques share with the Opus 107 Caprices distinct representation of a musical style
(for Bozza, the style proceeding from the French woodwind school), and ability to be
compositions. Karg-Elert’s Caprices and Robert Dick’s Flying lessons share a role in
flute repertoire as works pointing towards new expressive means of the instrument during
The inclusion of Caprice #30: Chaconne places Karg-Elert’s Opus 107 with only
two other works in flute repertoire, both composed after Karg-Elert’s Caprices, that
employ Passacaglia or Chaconne form. Hungarian pianist Ernst von Dohnányi’s (1877-
1960) Passacaglia op. 48 #2 (1959) for solo flute is the most well known work of this
form for the flute. Containing an ostinato twice as long and more melodic in character,
this eight-minute work exceeds Karg-Elert’s Chaconne both in length and technical
modifying only when the tonality changes from minor to major mode. In contrast, Karg-
86
Toff, 266.
87
Pellerite, 11.
27
Elert’s ostinato is presented in augmentation, rhythmically displaced, transposed, in
composer and conductor, composed Passacaille, Op. 35 for flute and piano in 1925. This
moderate difficulty.
28
CHAPTER 5
The Caprices provide a unique collection of studies that take the flutist on a tour
of style from the Baroque era to modern sounds. The collection is progressive not only
by the period of music history reflected but in level of difficulty as well. In the space of
the one year it might take a flutist to complete this single study, both sensitivity to
expanded tonal language, style, use of motive, rhythm, meter, and new techniques as well
technical facility cover a large gamut of musical material. For a broad overview of
Method
Analyses of several caprices in this chapter include graphs displaying form, tonal
centers, and voice leading. Without designating an urlinie, or fundamental line, in the
upper voice, these graphs utilize notation characteristic of Schenkerian analysis 88. Areas
of primary tonal center are indicated in the bass line and represent background harmonic
construction. The upper line traces voice leading throughout the piece, utilizing longer
note values to convey background notes of structural importance. For example, stemmed
88
Schenkerian graphs generally depict an urlinie, a large-scale descending line, spanning movements or
sections, from scale degree five or three to the tonic. These pitches are represented in half note values to
indicate their importance. I have chose to omit the urlinie in the following graphs as understanding the
basic foreground and background design is of primary importance, most relevant to preparing each piece
for performance or instruction.
29
progression. Notes without stems, occurring under a slur, represent (smaller-scale)
foreground passing elements. Pitches that appear as single eighth notes are neighbor
notes and are slurred to their resolution. Dotted slurs indicate the prolongation of a
certain pitch or harmony. This type of analysis assists in developing large-scale hearing
and creates forward direction in phrasing, a skill increasingly necessary and challenging
Caprice #1
musically the easiest caprice, with Italian and German titles indicating tempo (Mäβige
Viertel = moderately in four, Tempo giusto = a just tempo).89 The key and style of this
and belongs stylistically to the Baroque. The tenuto marks over eighth notes throughout
the caprice convey Baroque style, as does its melodic construction and harmonic
direction, and prominent melody throughout is clear to the performer. In measure one, a
C major broken chord in eighth notes defines the principle motive of the piece. The
second motive, also appearing in measure one, serves a connecting function and consists
of a 4-note, step-wise passage from the second sixteenth note of a beat to the next beat.
89
All Italian and German language used in the caprices (including titles) is translated in Appendix B.
Subsequent caprice titles will not have translations within the body of the text.
30
Example 1. Caprice #1, measure 1, motives X and Y.
caprice, exhibiting characteristics of binary form. Atypical of true binary form is the lack
of cadence in measure 14 to complete the first A section, replaced here with continuous
Section: A A’
Measure: 1 6 14 15 22 23 25
Tonal Center: I v → IV IV V I
Fewer non-chord tones are included in Caprice #1 than in later caprices and are
Sonata in E Minor for flute BWV 1034, movement one and cadences are avoided or elided
until the last measure of the piece. Consistent use of 4/4 meter, simple rhythmic patterns
31
of eighth and sixteenth notes, and limited range from C1 to G3 are other elements that
baroque literature for the flute, comparison or reference to this repertoire will assist
development of the flutist’s understanding of Baroque style and ability to place music
Caprice #2
Un poco mosso, ma non brillante (Leise bewegt, doch nicht brillant) in D minor is
another caprice baroque in style. Similarly to the first caprice, melody dominates. A
defining factor of the Opus 107 collection as both pedagogical material and substantive
musical composition is the symbiotic relationship within the music of technique and
style. The combination of these elements was Karg-Elert’s purpose in writing the
caprices, and this telos90 is exemplified in Caprice #2. Development of breath control
and technical fluidity are requirements to perform in one beat per measure (3/8 meter)
approach in later caprices, breath control is the factor that determines other technical
requirements (in this case, speed). Suggested phrases are measures 1-4, measures 4 –16.
measures 17-26, measures, 27-43 with quick breaths as needed, and measures 44-49.
More virtuosic than Caprice #1, the indicated tempo requires embouchure flexibility for
90
telos = end goal
32
Harmonic rhythm in this caprice is by measure, with passing tones as the primary
type of non-chord tone. Large-scale harmonic direction and formal outline of the piece
are as follows:
Section: A B A’
Measure: 1 16 26 27 36 46 49
Motive: X Y X
While each of the above tonalities is clearly emphasized, only the first two
cadences in a minor (measure 16) and F major (measure 26) are strong authentic
cadences. Other tonal centers imply certain harmonies but are not marked by a cadence
or stated outright. For example, measure 27 centers around E, yet leaves this tonal area
quickly before its mode can become obvious. Measures 46-49 in the above harmonic
outline indicate an authentic cadential progression, yet the caprice actually concludes
with a vii fully diminished chord resolving to the tonic d minor chord. Dominant
groupings in this caprice. In the following example, the pulse of one beat per measure is
brackets the notes by harmonic group, while the rhythmic pattern of one beat per measure
33
Example 2. Caprice #2, measures 23-25, instructive bracketing.
Caprice #3
Allegro alla Händel, non troppo brillante (Im Händelschen AllegrozeitmaB, nicht
zu brilliant) in F major is the last caprice of the collection in a Baroque style with
harmonic rhythm, regular phrase and cadence structure, and ornamentation as elements
characteristic of the Baroque period.91 Common time meter and moderate technical
demands make this caprice one of the easier works in the opus.
Two-measure groups of motives used in sequence, some derived yet distinct from
one another, characterize this caprice’s untraditional melodic construction. While Karg-
Elert unfolds new melodic material throughout, a few instances of previously used
motives occur providing shape and continuity to the work. Measure 13 uses the same
and measure 18 employs the opening motive in inversion (see measures 1-2).
the conclusion of the section (measure 8). The B section begins in c minor (v) and
wanders through several key areas before the inverted opening motive appears, albeit in g
91
The ornamentation is not entirely Baroque in style as an authentically Baroque work would begin the
trills in measures 20 and 21 from the upper note and on the beat. Also contrary to Baroque practice, Karg-
Elert indicates “ohne Nachschlag” or “without resolution” in m. 16.
34
minor (measure 18), signaling the A’ section. The following graph (Figure 1) depicts
35
Figure 1. Graph of Caprice #3
36
Caprice #4
The first of the opus not Baroque in style, Velicissimo e brillante (Äuβerst lebhaft
und glänzend ) in C major explores rhythmic organization and harmonic design with a
more modern approach. Interruptions to the 3/4 meter, including 5/4, 4/4, and 3/2 meters
in measures 20-25, as well as the hemiola of measures 14-15, obscure phrasing, which up
to this point in the collection has been composed around an organized pulse and meter.
The key of Caprice #4 is C major, yet this tonic is emphasized only in the
opening measure and conclusion, measures 41-44. Little that happens between these
progressions that end inconclusively, without strong cadential direction. The following
example demonstrates an arrival on F at the end of a phrase and section in measure 25:
one, measures 1-16, includes two distinct motives (see measures 1, 5) and progresses
tonally from C major to an abrupt phrase ending on Ab. Rests in measure 16 and a new
motivic shape in measure 17 signal the start of the B section. Only one phrase in length,
and perhaps not qualifying as a true section, this atypical passage concludes with a
second abrupt phrase ending on F (see example 3). F major, functioning as the
37
subdominant, begins the A’ reprise in measure 26 as the opening motive returns in this
key and the caprice concludes with a four-measure emphasis of the tonic chord.
Fortunately for the flutist, the ambiguity of tonal center and inconsistent metric
devices used in later caprices. Karg-Elert utilizes straight eighth notes that are
predominately slurred and upper register technique is developed as third octave patterns
imitate passages found in symphonic works of the time with C4 as the upper limit of the
range. This expansion of upper register facility is one of the collection’s hallmarks, and
later caprices.
Caprice #5
meter which imitates string repertoire of the classical period with slow harmonic rhythm,
rapid scalar passages, arpeggiations, and figurations to develop string crossings and bow
technique. The allegro tempo requires greater technical facility than previous caprices,
both because of challenging patterns requiring the use of alternate fingerings and because
of rapid articulations necessitating the use of multiple tonguing for the first time in the
opus.
38
Melodic construction in this caprice utilizes the following three motives:
These motives, combined with key areas, are used to define Caprice #5’s binary
form. Composed of motives X and Y, Section A travels from the tonic to the dominant in
motives X,Y, and Z in order of initial presentation. Resulting are two sections, balanced
in motivic content, but not in length. The tonic is reached only in the concluding
39
authentic cadence. The following graph (Figure 2) depicts form, harmonic structure,
40
Figure 2. Graph of Caprice #5
41
Caprice #6
capo ternary form with characteristic harmonic outline. Section A begins in the tonic
key and concludes with an authentic cadence in C minor (measure 17). Section B begins
in the relative major (Eb), digresses through several key areas, and arrives at a G major
measures in length, section B is longer than the 18-measure section A, slightly out of
Section: A B A
appearing in arches, with extensive use of neighbor notes and passing tones prominently
placed on accented beats for the first time in the opus. The following example
demonstrates:
42
Example 6. Caprice #6, typical melodic construction.
Measures 1-4.
Measures 14-17.
most adventurous characteristic of the caprice. With the exception of the first phrase of
both A and B sections and the prolonged tonic harmony shown in example 6, harmonic
rhythmically in one beat per bar. Typical triadic progressions move by third or fifth,
43
Caprice #7
This Moto perpetuo caprice in A minor is one of two identically titled caprices in
the collection, with a subtitle, Eguale, il piu presto possibile, to indicate speed and
equality without accent. Karg-Elert again challenges the flutist by requiring fluid
technique throughout slurred passages. With patterns grouped in units of five eighth
notes throughout the caprice, the 10/8 meter results in a pulse of two quintuple beats per
measure.92
progression. Three 5-note motives occur throughout this caprice. Motive X, consisting
of a note with an upper or lower neighbor followed by a triad in the opposite direction of
the neighbor note, generally appears in pairs; however, Karg-Elert also expands to three
or four successive units. Harmonic progression moves by fifths or thirds through these
units.
92
Henri Altes was one of the few other flutists to employ groupings of five into his pedagogical method
(Grand Method published in 1906).
44
The second motive (Y) consists of a descending triad (major or minor) followed by two
notes that create chromatic voice leading across each quintuple beat. A chromatic line
results through continued use of this motive as does fully diminished harmony. Triads
seventh chord, followed by a leap that moves step-wise into the following beat. As with
the previous two motives, the third motive is presented successively, creating step-wise
45
Melodic construction and Karg-Elert’s skillful voice leading combine to produce
wandering and ambiguous tonality in this continuous one-part form93, emphasizing the
tonic chord in first and last measures only. Motivic patterns used in succession create
groupings delineate some of the voice leading that is used (see motive Z).94
Karg-Elert discusses his compositional style in Moto Perpetuo pieces in his Study
Notes to 25 Capricien und Sonata [for saxophone], op.153 (1929), providing insight as to
The player must insert his own breathing places according to his own
technique and according to the speed at which he is practicing. At the
same time, he must observe the fundamental rules of phrasing. Only at the
real close of a phrase may he breathe immediately before a strong beat. In
many cases, the solution is to breathe after the strong beat, even at the
expense of omitting the note immediately following. In this case, it is
often better to omit one or two notes than to disturb the strict rhythm.95
caprice is constant and forward motion across the musical line with minimal
interruption.96
93
Placement of the X motive throughout the caprice does provide some sectional division; however, motive
X frequency and continuous harmonic progressions indicate a one-part form emphasizing motivic
development.
94
While it initially seems somewhat incongruent that Karg-Elert did not use double-stemmed notation
earlier in the caprice (similar voice leading exists prior to measure 17), consideration of the rhythmic
placement of these pitches (the first and fifth eighth note of each quintuple beat of motive 3) reveals the
composer’s method: the double-stemmed pitches are the first occurrences of primary notes of voice-leading
placed on those eighth note beats.
95
Sigfrid Karg-Elert, Twenty-Five Caprices (and an atonal sonata), (San Antonio, TX: Southern Music
Company, 1985), Study Notes.
96
Particularly for the less developed student, the suggestion to omit a note or two in the service of this aim
is a solution reflective of the pragmatic, pedagogical intent of the opus.
46
Caprice #8
predominantly slurred texture in 6/4 meter. In comparison with previous caprices that
develop similar skills, Karg-Elert challenges the performer to incorporate the major
seventh interval within the arpeggiations. Further melodic complexity is achieved by the
Example 10. Caprice #8, measures 9-10, atypical interval sequence and phrase shape.
The progressive nature of this caprice is largely due to its untraditional harmonic
this F major piece. For example, the first phrase travels from F major to E major (VII) in
measure 4. In the middle of this caprice, Karg-Elert introduces melodic and harmonic
material including whole tone scales and resulting augmented triads, further expanding its
modern tonal language. Measures 14-16 contain a descending whole tone scale spanning
47
Example 11. Caprice #8, measures 14-20, whole tone and augmented construction.
Inconsistent with the piece’s harmonic content, both before and after this section,
the appearance of such harmony is striking. Up to this point in the collection, harmonic
language and direction has been typical of the baroque, classical, or romantic periods, and
the use of whole tone and augmented material provides a glimpse of modern tonal aspects
which are found later in the collection. Appearance of such markedly different material,
preceded and followed by similar motivic material, gives this caprice the suggestion of an
untraditional three-part form. The modern B section (measures 13-20) is distinct, yet
approached continuously from the A section. The conclusion on the B section in measure
20 does suggest a point of formal ending as it is the only point in the caprice to allow a
breath at the end of a measure. Measure 21 clearly returns in the subdominant key with
the opening motive. A strong authentic cadence concludes the caprice. The following
diagram demonstrates:
48
Section: A B A’
Measure: 1 4 5 13 21 28
Motive: X Y X
Caprice #9
complex material throughout the caprice. Notated in 6/16 meter or alternatively as 2/8+
3/897, understanding the rhythmic organization is essential for the flutist. Alternating
patterns, two groups of three sixteenth notes or three groups of two sixteenth notes (see
example 12) occur throughout the caprice with a constant sixteenth note pulse. Once
sufficient speed is attained, the meter is organized in one beat per bar. Hemiola exists on
two different levels, both within the measure and across two measure units and is
Measures 17-18. Hemiola across two measures, created by chord changes and
tenuto marks (motive R)
97
The published time signature is incorrect. (2/8 + 3/8) should be (2/8 or 3/8).
49
Measures 19-21. Hemiola within measures, created by variations of
the same motive (motive X)
Motivic sequencing and development create the melodic and harmonic shape of
Caprice #9. Three of four motives are closely related as sequencing of motive X in
measures 1-4 creates a background seventh chord, which is then incorporated into
motives Y and Z (see example 13). (While motives Y and Z share this chord, they are
50
Example 13. Caprice #9, related motives.
in inverted and modulated form provides definition to the form of this caprice. In
major statement of motive X, also in inversion. The motive reappears for the final time
on the subdominant in measure 38. Lacking a strong dominant arrival to conclude the
51
piece, the C major chord (IV), created by sequencing of the X motive in measures 38-40,
Caprice #10
romantic style, it serves as a turning point in Opus 107, with more complex rhythms,
Karg-Elert’s choice of 9/16 meter is noteworthy. The chosen meter and tempo
suggest one beat per bar, yet much of the caprice contains harmonic changes suggesting
6/16 meter. The result is hemiola, further developing this compositional technique from
Caprice #9 (see example 14). Only from measures 20-27 and 29-33 are the meter and
Example 14. Caprice #10, measures 1-11, harmonic groupings creating hemiola,
suggesting 6/16 meter (triangles indicate pulse).
52
Development of intonation is a skill critical to this caprice as several pitches
(C#’s, second octave E, F#, and G#, as well as the pianissimo high A of measure 33) are
problematic for the flutist. Complicating this challenge are difficult interval combinations
containing rapidly slurred passages between registers. See examples 14 and 15.
passages should remain smooth without accent in the upper notes. A faster tempo choice
allows harmonic and phrase structure to be clearer as the passing or connecting nature of
Example 15. Caprice #10, measures 13-17, rapid slurred passages between registers.
mediant motion in Caprice #10. While the iii harmony of measure 17 is diatonic usage,
III harmony of measure 4 implies a chromatic mediant from the Romantic era.
Measure: 1 4 11 12 17 29 33
53
Dominant harmony in measure 12 is shown in parentheses because it is only implied in
that measure. The C# of the first inversion iii chord (E – G# - C#) is resolved to B in the
Caprice #11
complements the preceding caprice in the relative key of A major. Predominant rhythmic
pulse is the dotted quarter note, and the straightforward rhythm, with the exception of two
measures containing hemiola, incorporates both duple and triple groupings at the
sixteenth note level. Karg-Elert’s notation of triplet sixteenth notes of repeated pitch,
uniquely in the opus, reflects the need for further development of multiple tonguing as
tone scale (often used in place of fifths or fourths in modern music), are of principle
importance to this work, evidenced by triads that move by major third at several places in
the caprice. Measures 15-16 show one instance of this motion (see example 16).
54
Example 16. Caprice #11, characteristic melodic construction.
Inconsistent phrase lengths, from two and a half measures to six and a half
Caprice #11. Example 16 shows the related but distinct defining motives of each section
(see measures 1 and 13). Section A travels from the tonic to relative major in measure
12. Section B begins in the dominant in measure 13, traveling through several key areas
before concluding with a large descending harmonic minor scale in the tonic key. While
more common in minor mode works, the background harmony (f# - A – C# - f#)
continues the harmonic progression by thirds used in the previous major mode caprice.
55
Figure 3 shows formal structure, basic harmonic organization and voice-leading in
Caprice #11. Voice leading in the upper voice indicates pitch only, omitting actual
register displacement.
56
Figure 3. Graph of Caprice #11
57
Caprice #12
beginning of the prevalence of chromaticism from this point to the end of the collection,
functions in two capacities, shown in measures 1-2 (see example 17). In measure one,
chromatic material is used within a motive (X) that creates a fourth within the measure.
Two occurrences of this motive in sequence create an interval of a fifth across the
measure. In this role, utilized four times throughout the caprice, the sequence of
58
Measure 11 shows a derivation of motive X (now labeled motive Y), used in sequence to
Several derivations of this motive and sequence are used throughout the caprice,
rhythmically continuous structure (measures 8 and 14) and distinct use of motives within
those sections. Section A (measures 1-8) employs chromatic motives X and Z that
outline intervals of fourth, fifths as well as MM, Mm, or mm seventh chords, maintaining
of motive Y (fully diminished seventh chords) amidst other tonally ambiguous harmonies
return to motive X in f# minor and disappearance of motive Y signal the A section reprise
in measure 15. A tonic statement of motive X further establishes the form in measure 21.
59
Harmonic structure in this caprice atypically contributes to the three-part formal
designation. Opening in the relative minor, the A section concludes with an authentic
leading (see downbeats of measures 9, 11, and 13). Section A’ harmony functions more
typically, with progressions leading to the tonic conclusion. Noteworthy is the absence
of the tonic throughout the caprice until the final measure. Form in Caprice #12 is shown
Section: A B A’
Measure: 1 7 8 15 21 24
vi ←V ? ii → vi → I
Caprice #13
composition with differentiated styles for each voice. The instructions “quasi 2 Flauti”
or “wie 2 Flöten” (as if two flutists) provide performance directions, and Karg-Elert’s
notation assists the performer with visual differentiation between the two parts.
98
B = V/e. E minor the is key of the caprices opening. Dominant harmony typically progresses forward to
a tonic key area, not backwards.
60
Example 19. Caprice #13, measures 1-4, instructional notation, motives X and Y.
The two voices, functioning as alternating dux and comes throughout the caprice,
challenge the flutist to develop control across wide interval leaps. 99 Awareness of which
role is functioning is necessary at all times as each voice must retain the appropriate note-
length, style, and dynamics prescribed. Despite their character differences, background
voice leading is woven between both parts, creating continuity amongst contrast.
The ternary form used in Caprice #13 is shown in the following table:
Section: A B A codetta
Measure: 1 8 9 16 17 24 25 41 50
Tonal center: Eb D g Eb F G c Eb Bb Eb
I V → iii I II V→ vi I V I
With the exception of Section B, the harmonic outline of this caprice follows standard
ternary progression.100 Section A begins and concludes in the tonic key and is followed
99
dux=leader, comes = follower. These terms are most often used musically in discussions of fugue.
100
Standard ternary form frequently concludes the B section on the dominant.
61
by the B section, which travels from untraditional II to G major, a key functioning as the
dominant of the following c minor section. The section A reprise beings in the relative
Motives X and Y, shown in example 19, create the entire melodic construction of Section
while motive Y serves an accompanying role. Dialog between these two motives
includes exchange of roles between upper and lower voices (measure five shows the
upper voice taking the accompanying role, while the melodic line moves into the lower
voice). Motives S and T, shown in example 20, create the entire melodic construction of
Section B. Motive S is derived from motive X. A small cadential motive (Q) consisting
62
Caprice #14
The second Moto perpetuo of the collection, this caprice in E minor challenges
the flutist with rapid tempo “as fast as possible” (Il più presto possibile, So rasch als
#12, several compositional similarities are present. Tonally, the caprices share the same
key signature; Caprice #14 is in E minor and Caprice #12 concludes in the relative major
(G), with predominant space composed in e minor. Secondly, within their respective
diatonic key centers, both caprices use extensive chromaticism in their voice leading.
Fast tempo markings and rhythmic similarities further connect these caprices, resulting in
Example 21. Similarity in construction between Caprice #12 and Caprice #14.
63
Caprice #12. measures 16-18
parentheses to indicate its acceptable omission for a breath (see example 21, measure 5)
and a dotted barline inserted within two different measures to indicate the addition of two
eighth-note beats to each measure (see example 21, measure 8). It is unclear why Karg-
Elert did not simply change the meter to accommodate the extra beats. 101
Flutter tonguing, a modern technique used for the first time in Karg-Elert’s
101
Based on the pulse created by the phrasing and dynamic organization in measures 5-8, the music could
be reorganized as shown in example 21 (see extended barlines and times signatures in parentheses). This
organization would preserve the integrity of Karg-Elert’s musical line (measures 5-6 would then balance
measures 7-8) and would not disrupt the perpetual motion of the caprice.
64
Three-part in form, this caprice includes a B section, differentiated by motive,
from measures 5-11. A return of the opening motive in Eb (measure 11), a half step
below its original key area, appears as a re-introduction to section A as a stronger and
more complete statement of the opening motive occurs one bar later in measure 12,
serving as the definitive section A’ arrival in E major (mode has been altered).
Caprice #15
idea explored in Caprice #13, the use of a two-voice melody for a solo line with notation
plays one pitch at a time and Karg-Elert could have notated this caprice with single-
stemmed pitches; however, this would not have represented the compositional process.
The flute line moves in counterpoint with itself, and because of given notation, this
In contrast to Caprice #13, the two-voice melody is composed in a way that the
two voices are not entirely separate; the parts do not function as dux and comes. Instead,
the two equally prominent voices are woven together, at times mirroring each other and
sharing pitch contour. Either voice can function independently as the melody throughout.
65
Example 23. Caprice #15, measure 3-4, mirrored voices, sharing pitch contour.
The background voice leading, shown in double stemmed pitches and markings of
example 24, is simple and straightforward; however, larger intervals become part of the
background melodic fabric later in the caprice. The modified recurrence of the opening
Caprice #16
Unique in its musical portrayal of humor, several factors contribute to this affect. First is
the use of meter, with the uncommon 11/8 meter and two additional measures of10/8
102
Sckenk in Letters to Sceats, A10
66
meter. With a constant eighth note pulse throughout, inconsistent subdivisions within the
measures create frequent metric shifts. Caprice #16 contains several motives, usually
two to three eighth note beats in length, grouped by beam, and defined in style by
rhythm, articulation and pitch contour. Combined in unpredictable ways, motives include
staccatos, slurs, and marcato and tenuto eighth notes. Ensuing variety and frequently
Example 25. Caprice #16, measure 4, humorous motive created by hemiola and grace
notes.
measures 15 and 16, creates an unpredictable modern Picardy affect. Upper and lower
neighbor notes and connecting passing tones highlight this concluding shift.
67
Example 26. Caprice #16, measures 15-17, mode transformation.
melodic structure with voice leading governed largely by a progression of fourths from G
followed by a descent through the same pitches in reverse order, creates a palindrome
across the second section of the caprice. See Figure 4. The following graph displays this
background structure, along with formal sections, defining motives, and tonal center.
While the repeat sign in measure five and unresolved dominant chord (creating continuity
across the barline) indicate a binary form, Karg-Elert employs a three-part rounded
binary structure. The principle B section motive (see measure 5) is clearly derived, yet
rhythmically distinct from the opening motive. A return to the opening motive in Eb
68
major at measure 9 begins the A section reprise. The previously mentioned mode
69
Figure 4. Graph of Caprice #16
70
Caprice #17
Leggero veloce, giocoso (Leicht, spielend, sehr rasch) in F minor takes as its
starting point a compositional idea from Caprice #7, developing it into a more
challenging guise reflective of the modern style. Motive X from Caprice #7 is expanded
by one note, adding a third to the end of the motive. Combined with the halving of note
values, this melodic alteration produces metric organization in 12/8 meter. The following
example demonstrates.
Measure 1. Caprice #7
71
Also reflective of Caprice #7 is the appearance of scalar voice leading across
motivic repetitions (see example 28). Caprice #7 creates a chromatic line while Caprice
Present in both caprices are notational devices, including double stemmed pitches
incorporating sequences of secondary dominant chords that prolong tonic arrival as well
as sequences of parallel major chords, connected with motion by minor third and tritone.
Chromaticism and intervals of thirds and fourths are used in the foreground level to
72
create background lines. The following exerpt from Caprice #17 highlights these
features:
Caprice #18
“higher development of style or form through the technique of different instruments has
from times of old played a very remarkable part in the history of technique.”103 Borrowed
103
Karg-Elert, 30 Capricen, 3.
73
techniques in Caprice #18, idiomatic to other instruments, include sustained melodic
notes alternating with rapid tremelo patterns, rolled chords, and arpeggiated cadences.
Example 30. Caprice #18, compositional design inspired by idiomatic violin and piano
technique.
74
These compositional elements further develop the performer’s technical facility,
melodic and harmonic contour that rests on G# (the tritone) at the end of the first section
(measures 1-7) and cadences in D minor at the end of the second section (measure 8-18).
chords, are prominent, leaving the tonal center ambiguous throughout much of the work.
Bb is given important tonal emphasis, beginning in the opening measure and serving as
an important organizational pitch in the second half of the piece, but despite its
prominence, Bb is never a stable key center in the caprice. The traditional progression of
chords in measures sixteen and seventeen, stabilize the caprice in D minor (d: V – vii û7 –
Caprice #19
piece in 2/4 meter. Rhythm, meter, and range place this caprice in an earlier location
within the opus; however, the more difficult key of E major, together with transient tonal
placement two-thirds of the way through. Continuing a compositional idea set forth in
the previous caprice, simple voice leading prevails, and presentation of strong tonic
75
Karg-Elert uses a three-part form in this caprice and motives shown in the
The following graph displays Caprice #19’s form motivic usage, and background
76
Figure 5. Graph of Caprice #19
77
Karg-Elert employs both traditional and modern foreground elements in this
caprice. Broken chords, step-wise passages with simple non-chord tones, and dominant –
tonic motion indicate earlier musical style (see motives X and Y of example 31), while
tritone intervals, diminished chords, and interrupted chromatic passages indicate modern
Example 32. Caprice #19, measures 36-39, modern (tritone and diminished) construction,
assisting notation.
stemmed notes indicate voice-leading and metrically displaced groups of four and three
sixteenth notes articulate interval sequences and chords (see Example 32).
Caprice #20
Karg-Elert’s suggestion to include the whole tone scale in repertoire. In his Appendix to
the caprices, The logical development of modern figuration, he writes, “The whole tone
scale plays a very important part in the modern music. Technically it is not more difficult
than any diatonic or chromatic scale. The difficulty does not lie in the technique at all,
78
but in the unfamiliar mental conception.”104 The new harmonic construction of this ‘C
organization, range, and tempo. Serving as a tonal turning point in the opus, after which
melodic organization, chords are constructed on mediants, tritones, and enharmonic triads
(often augmented), reflecting the nonexistence of diatonic chords in the whole tone
system.
Four basic constructs comprise this caprice, as shown in the marked score of
example 33. First are whole tone scales (labeled “W”), presented either directly or
broken, and sometimes occurring across extreme register displacement; second are
sequences of augmented triads (labeled “+”) that create either whole tone scale fragments
(measures 6, 17) or fifth (descending fourth) progressions (measures 13, 21) by their
rhythmic emphasis; third are sequences of tritone intervals (labeled “tt”) that create whole
tone segments (measures 8, 23); and finally, half steps or chromatic segments (labeled
104
Karg-Elert, 33.
79
Example 33. Caprice #20, marked score.
80
A B A’ B’ form is used in this caprice as shown in Figure 6. Comprising section
A are measures 1-9. Tonal emphasis travels from G# to G (the dominant in measure 2),
begins in measure 10 with a distinct triplet motive and lasts only four measures before the
reprise measures 3-6 before Karg-Elert again employs section B material to conclude the
While Caprice #20’s tonal organization is clearly based on the whole tone scale
with augmented chords derived from it, background voice leading reflects the inclusion
of traditional melodic and harmonic motion (fifths, fourths, and thirds) into the modern
construction that undermines its stability. The following graph depicts Caprice #20’s
form and background tonal emphases, with +’s indicating pitches supported by
81
Figure 6. Graph of Caprice #20
82
Caprice #20 is unique within the opus but is strongly representative of Karg-
Elert’s style in its inclusion of several unusual terms for musical expression. See
Caprice #21
Viennese waltz in 3/4 meter. Reminiscent of Stravinsky’s neoclassical style, clear tonal
center and traditional authentic cadences create semblance of belonging to the past, while
This work is in rounded binary form (see Figure 7 for graph depicting form and
tonal structure), and beginning in the tonic key, Karg-Elert modulates to the dominant by
the completion of the first phrase in measure 8. Immediately following, the submediant
(G#) is emphasized for the remainder of the A section, concluding with an authentic
cadence at the repeat sign in measure 17. Beginning in measure 18, section B continues
major, its function here is ii harmony of the following D major tonality. This harmonic
which begins with an appogiatura from C# - B. From measures 23-24, the ‘e’ pitch is
carried over, becoming the appogiatura for the following D major section. This section
employs the opening motive and signals the A’ return. The recurrence of opening
83
material at this point (measure 24) minimally qualifies the caprice to be considered
rounded binary, only returning to section A material identically transposed in the first
measure, with subsequent material only loosely following rhythmic and motivic shapes of
or passing material.
Phrase length and rhythm in Caprice #21 are other elements appearing in
modernized fashion, rather than the traditional waltz, with phrase lengths of eight, four,
Example 34. Caprice #21, mm. 26-29, waltz with hemiola (diamonds indicate pulse).
84
Figure 7. Graph of Caprice #21
85
Caprice #22
flexibility and smooth finger technique, particularly in the third register of the flute, as it
develops and explores the chromatic scale. Not content to write a simple technical
exercise, Karg-Elert uses the chromatic scale as both a foreground and background
element, decorated by various intervals and harmonic progressions (see example 35).
Measures 5-6. Intervals of ascending 4th’s, 5th’s, 6th’s and 7th’s create simultaneous
upper and lower chromatic lines:
86
Creating contrast to the predominant chromaticism, Karg-Elert inserts a section
constructed areas of tonal center, and patterns of motivic usage are replaced by the
sequences used in Example 35. While the overall effect suggests a one-part form, the
following graph (Figure 8) suggests a two-part form, largely due to tonal design that
begins on F (neither major nor minor) but concludes in D minor. Background voice
leading, random at first analysis, unfolds traditionally by intervals of fifths, thirds, and
half steps.
87
Figure 8. Graph of Caprice #22
88
The following example traces Caprice #22’s compositional design on a more
4* thirds Gb
17 background chromatic scale across 4th’s and tritones D2 – A2, Ab2 – Eb2
20 chromatic segments E2 – F1
89
Caprice #23
passionato) in C# minor, the only slower caprice in the collection, is written in recitative
style. Karg-Elert suggests rubato and rhythmic pacing by using the letters “r” and “a” to
represent ritards and accelerandos105 and these instructions employ dotted lines to
indicate the span over which tempo change occurs (see example 38).
construction make this caprice arguably the most modern-sounding caprice in the
collection. Organized tonally in C# minor, there is a strong sense of key center with
dominant-tonic pull in the opening and concluding phrases; however, this stability is
absent elsewhere in the caprice as the middle section is tonally ambiguous because of the
use of chromaticism and fully diminished harmonies. Melodic direction is often buried
form. Section A (measures 1-7) begins with two phrases that cadence in the tonic and
relative major. Section B (measures 8-20) contains tonally wandering progressions with
extensive use of fully diminished harmony. The return of the A section begins in
measure 21 and contains an elaboration of the first phrase, repeatedly emphasizing the G#
to establish a strong dominant key area, moving to an authentic cadence that concludes
the piece. Aside from the repetition of the opening motive (measure 1 = 21), this caprice
105
r = ritardando, a = accelerando, aa = much accelerando, r…a…aa = slow to begin, accelerate, then much
acceleration
90
provided to assist the performer’s musical interpretation of this caprice. Significant
points of form, harmonic construction, and background voice leading are indicated.
91
Example 38. Caprice #23, marked score.
92
Caprice #24
Rapido quanto e possibile, con suono sempre aguzzo (So rasch wie möglich, Mit
durchweg spitzigem Ton) in Eb major is one of the more unique caprices in the opus,
Despite a constant sixteenth-note pulse throughout the caprice, the 7/16 meter and
varied note groupings create rhythmic instability. The opening twelve measures (2 + 2 +
These rhythmic groupings, combined with different interval contours, help to define ten
distinct one-measure motives present in this caprice; generally occurring in pairs, the
motives are often closely related. In the following example, motive W contains a fully or
half diminished seventh chord in similar shape (inverted) to motive Y’s Mm seventh
chord. Both motives contain identical rhythmic grouping and conclude with similar pitch
93
Discussion of formal structure is not applicable to this caprice, as there is no
organization. While motive Y (see example 39) contains a V – I harmony within, other
material and there is no consistent harmonic motion across motives either. The interval
step-wise motion.
Example 40. Caprice #24, measures 30-33, chromatic and scalar lines across sevenths.
Caprice #24 lacks the tonic – dominant polarity used in nearly all of the other caprices
Caprice #25
minor triads within two motives distinguished by rhythmic shape. See examples 41 and
42. The first motive, consisting of eighth notes preceded by two grace notes, outlines
major and minor triads and creates the defining character of the caprice.
94
Example 41. Caprice #25, motive X.
Measure 1.
Measure 13. Motive X is modified with the inclusion of augmented triads across
wider intervals
The second motive is made up of triplet sixteenth notes that also outline major and minor
triads. This motive contains chromatic motion that leaps up a fifth at its conclusion.
95
A third motive, largely defined by rhythm and contrasting harmonic material, outlines
augmented triads or seventh chords (instead of major or minor triads) and is present only
in measures 14-15.
this caprice is largely defined on the foreground level by triadic content in the motives
and resulting voice leading from their combination. Voices comprising each triad
typically move by half step, whole step, or occasionally by third to the next chord,
The key signature, first measure, and dominant – tonic emphasis of the last
measure confirm Caprice #25 to be in C minor; however, at no other time is this tonality
implied. Material between measures 1 and 20 passes through several key areas without
96
settling in one key. A typical progression is shown in measures 5-10. Melodic direction
Karg-Elert has notated the meter as 6/8 (3/8) in Caprice #25, providing dotted
barlines to indicate the 3/8 metric division and tempo will largely determine which
organization the flutist uses. A second important notational element in this caprice is the
continued use of brackets to assist the performer in understanding hemiola (see measures
Caprice #26
Capriccioso, con civetteria (Kokett und kapriziös) is the second caprice in the
opus based primarily on the whole-tone and chromatic scales, further developing these
modern elements explored first in Caprice #20. Three basic whole tone motives are used
and in the first motive (R), there is simultaneous foreground and background whole tone
presence (see example 46). This motive later appears inverted in measure 22.
97
Example 46. Caprice #26, measure 2, motive R.
The second whole tone motive includes a whole tone scale interrupted by minor seconds,
appearing in two different rhythmic guises. See example 47. (Note the inclusion of a
new notational symbol [T] which provides alternate rhythmic organization to the bar,
Measure 9.
Measure 23.
98
The third motive is a descending whole tone scale uninterrupted in pitch but displaced by
register.
Chromatic progressions also define this caprice and one particularly unique
Caprice #26 differs from its whole tone predecessor (Caprice #20) in two
continuous piece, and second, melodic content in Caprice #26 includes intervals of fifths
and fourths as was previously not the case. Motive Q of Caprice #26 contains these
99
intervals, contrasting with the modern whole tone motives surrounding the perfect
intervals.
Caprice #27
challenges the flutist with unstable metric construction and ambiguity in tonal
caprice. Melodic construction often takes the form of motivic sequences, emphasizing
motion by a certain interval and in the following example, Karg-Elert sequences a motive
Example 51. Caprice #27, measures 10-14, motive X including sequence of fourths.
100
Further tonal instability is created by background progressions that outline unstable
Unpredictable articulation and pitch groupings that are not aligned with strong
beats of the 9/8 meter, undermine metric organization. In the following example, a
sequence of three statements (beginning on beat three of each measure) contain multiple
A similar pattern of sequences not in alignment with traditional 9/8 pulse occurs in
measures 17-20.
101
Caprice #28
complexity in several elements, including tonal design, 12/16 (4/8) meter, rapid tempo,
Tonal design, created by use of modern harmonic and melodic material on both
through several inconclusive key areas and lacking definitive cadential motion until the
structural role in previous caprices, is here used primarily as a connecting device (see
example 54).
102
In the following example, Karg-Elert combines three elements of tonal ambiguity.
with fully diminished seventh chords, creating a whole tone background progression
While there does seem to be a sectional division halfway through this caprice
which rests on Ab before continuing in eb in measure 8, the overall harmonic and motivic
ternary structure. The following graph shows the background melodic and harmonic
voice leading that defines the one-part form. Roman numeral chord analysis in the bass
voice has been omitted where triadic harmonic support is not present and these undefined
103
Figure 9. Graph of Caprice #28
104
Caprice #29
explores keys that are far removed from C major, requiring the flutist to continue
developing that which is unfamiliar. Consistent with notational practice throughout the
opus, Karg-Elert’s unusual groupings reveal compositional design that would otherwise
be less obvious. In this caprice, intervals and triads are highlighted by metrically
The five basic motives present in this caprice are defined by interval content and
length (in sixteenth notes) and are presented in the following example.
105
Measures 8-10. Motive C – two fifths connected by half step
harmonic progressions are created on a smaller scale across motivic sequencing within
augmented chord (f-a-c#), while motives C and D contain chromatic motion. Despite the
tonal character of the motives and progressions outlined by their sequencing, Karg-Elert
does retain a strong sense of key in this caprice. F# major is evident in the opening
statement and final authentic cadence but is also re-established midway through the
caprice from measures 17-23. A strong dominant arrival is avoided in measure 33,
providing space for motive A to return in the tonic key (measure 37) before concluding.
106
Similar to Caprice #23, the return of the opening motive late in the piece functions as a
Caprice #30
characterized by an ostinato bass line, exceeds the other caprices in length, development,
and scope, and represents many compositional elements found in the preceding twenty-
nine caprices. A form widely used by Karg-Elert in repertoire for various instruments,
Chaconne and Passacaglia titles appear in his works with little differentiation.
ostinato statements, resembling a strictly defined Passacaglia, where only the ostinato
itself, not its harmonic structure, is consistently worked into the piece. As a composer
and performer on the harmonium and organ, Karg-Elert was adept with the form; his
most well known example is the Passacaglia and Fugue on BACH, op. 150 (1931) for
organ.
appear at first glance that the Chaconne belongs with the stylistically Baroque caprices at
the beginning of the collection; however, analysis reveals that musical language
The first four measures of the piece present the ostinato bass, a descending four-
note pattern in the key of F minor. Unusual for its short length and lack of melodic
107
contour, the resulting harmonic outline created by successive statements provides an
Variation I. Simple quarter notes, low to middle register, outline the following
harmony: i – v – iv – VI – V
Variation II. Simple quarter and eighth notes with the ostinato appearing on
beat two of each measure
Variation V. Two-voice melody containing the prime form of the ostinato in the
lower voice and also a parallel ostinato statement from Ab – G – F
– Eb in the upper voice (this anticipates the modulation to Ab
major in variation VII)
Variation VI. Ostinato pitches appear as upper neighbor notes and their
resolutions. Introduction of multiple tonguing
108
Variation IX. Ostinato is modified to a descending four-note chromatic line that
appears twice across thirty-second note tremolos and third
progressions. The chromatic alteration creates harmonic motion to
d minor.
Variation XIV. Ostinato returns to the tonic key in its prime form and original
range. Descending thirty-second note chords, connected by
chromatic passages, outline the following harmony:
i – v – VI – III - V
Variation XV. Ostinato is not present in this variation. Using minor third
intervals and seconds (both major and minor), the first two
measures present a chromatic palindrome. Six intervals of a fifths
are outlined in the third measure (with upper and lower neighbor
notes to the first pitch of each group). The fourth measure contains
a complete but fragmented chromatic scale with a tonal center on
C.
Variation XVI. A chromatic run is followed by root position triads, based on each
pitch of the ostinato, used in sequence. While the upper voice
clearly begins on F and indicates tonic harmony, a progression
from C2 to C1(in the lower voice staccato notes) sets up a C pedal
point, which announces the final statement of the ostinato in the
next variation. Rapid, disjunct intervals and tempo makes this
variation the most technically challenging section of the caprice
109
Variation XVII. Virtuosic ‘ad libitum’ chromatic scales connect the ostinato pitches
in its prime form. The concluding four measures present a codetta,
emphasizing the tonic key. Range expands to Db4.
Karg-Elert’s looseness in following the ostinato form and desire for a modern guise.
110
In addition to the ostinato form used in Caprice #30, Karg-Elert employs a quasi
rounded binary structure created by tonal centers. The first section includes the ostinato
and first six variations in the tonic key, f minor, and the second section (variations seven
major, bb minor, c minor, and d minor. The third section (variations fourteen through
seventeen) returns to f minor, with the ostinato in its prime form; however, the exception
111
Example 60
112
113
CHAPTER 6
PERFORMANCE SUGGESTIONS
Traditionally included in the etude genre, the Caprices, Opus 107 are generally
not performed in recital or recorded. Hungarian flutist Gergely Ittzés is the one flutist
known to have recorded Caprice #30: Chaconne and can be heard on the CD, Late
including style (contrasting or similar), key relation, or emphasized technical skill. The
outcome of such groupings reflects the concept of Paul Hindemith’s Acht Stücke fur flöte
allein (1927), a group of eight short pieces representing the German style of the early
twentieth century.108
106
This recording was produced by Hungarton Records, Ltd.: HCD 31925
107
Surdell, 24.
108
It is unknown whether Hindemith had knowledge of the Caprices when he composed Acht Stücke (eight
years after the Caprices’ composition).
114
The following selections are one possible “suite” of Caprices:
These pieces have been selected for varied expressions representing the span of musical
styles present in the opus: Baroque style, Classical style, modern Viennese-waltz style,
dramatic and tonally ambiguous recitative affect, and whole-tone (modern) style.
tone, quartal, chromatic, or fully diminished tonal language (elements found in the
1. Tempo giusto
2. Un poco mosso, ma non brillante
3. Allegro alla Händel (non troppo brillante)
115
Caprice #23 and #30 are aptly paired as a set of two Caprices capable of standing on
The following piece are grouped together for their closely related key scheme and
These are but a few likely combinations for a Karg-Elert Suite of Caprices.
116
CONCLUSION
Leipzig Conservatory and was a gifted performer, primarily on keyboard instruments, but
from all of these roles, he created an opus for the flute that extended the instrument’s
technical capabilities through reflection of past musical styles and representation of the
With the exception of the Baroque-style pieces found in the beginning of the
collection, the 30 Capricen für Flöte allein, Opus 107 exemplify late nineteenth-century
ambiguous whole tone and fully diminished harmonies. Frequently, tonal center is
established in the opening and concluding measures, with a prolonged sense of tonal
ambiguity between the beginning and end. Changes in melodic construction across the
opus reflect increasingly contemporary design as the use of lyrical motives is gradually
and ternary forms, emphasizing departure and return, and frequently not complying with
traditional harmonic or motivic expectations. The caprices in the latter part of the
developmental in nature. The last caprice combines the continuous compositional style
117
with three-part form as a loosely-treated ostinato is woven into a quasi rounded binary
form.
both craftsmanship and expressivity are present. Despite criticism for not following the
modern, atonal aesthetic of his time, Karg-Elert’s Caprices remain in flute literature as
This music persists in flute literature, principally as technical repertoire, but deservingly
118
APPENDIX A
119
Caprice Collections for Flute
109
Speculative date of composition is 1860 as this was a period of instrumental concentration for
Mercadante.
120
Joachim Andersen 26 Caprices for Flute, op. 37 *
(1847-1909)
* date(s) unknown
121
APPENDIX B
122
Development of Compositional Style in Sigfrid Karg-Elert’s 30 Capricen für Flöte allein Opus 107
Baroque (1-3)
Overriding Classical (4-6) Transition to modern style Modern
Style Transitional (7-8)
Familiar key signatures More use of sharps and flats Increasingly unfamiliar or
Key C*, d, F, a, D, c A, f#, f, E ambiguous (not diatonic)
w.t.(20,26), B, c#, E, bb, F#
Simple time signatures Increasingly difficult time Further exploration of complex time
Rhythmic and Metric 3/4, 4/4, 3/8, 10/8, 6/4 signatures - 6/16, 9/16, 6/8, signatures - 7/16, 12/16, 6/16
Design 4/8, 11,8, 12/8
Simple quarter, eighth, and Use of hemiola, meter changes, increasing complexity and variation of
sixteenth note rhythms 32nd note subdivisions rhythmic construction within the piece
(23, 24, 25)
*upper case denotes major mode, lower case denotes minor mode n.c.t. = non-chord tones w.t. = whole tone
123
APPENDIX C
124
Dictionary of Italian and German Terms
2 Un poco mosso, ma non brillante Leise bewegt, doch nicht brillant faint turbulence, not with brilliance
amabile lieblich peaceful, sweet
3 Allegro alla Händel (non troppo brillante) Im Händelschen Allegrozeitmaß (nicht zu brillant) as an Allegro of Handel’s time
(not too brilliantly)
grave il suono mit breitem Ton with a wide/broad tone
grazioso zierlich delicate
senza resoluzione ohne Nachschlag without resolution
4 Velocissimo e brillante Äußerst lebhaft und glänzend. Extremely quick and brilliant
6 Appassionato e stretto Leidenschaftlich, treibend (rasche ganze Takte) passionately, driven, a quick one
beat per measure
8 Con molto brio Sehr lebhaft very lively, with much energ
125
9 Rapido e brillante Rasch und glänzend fast and brilliant/shining
11 Velocissimo e molto leggero Äußerst geschwind und locker very fast and light
con fuoco feurig with fire
16 Un poco mosso, unmoristico Etwas lebhaft, mit Humor somewhat lively, with humor
17 Leggero veloce, giocoso Leicht, spielend, sehr rasch light, fast, effortless, with much
speed
18 Adagio (quasi cadenza) Adagio (im Stile einer Kadenz) Very slow in the style of a cadenza
con fuoco sehr heftig with violence
allargando breit broad
vivace lebhaft lively
19 Vivacissimo, scintillante Locker, sprühend, äußerst geschwind relaxed, bubbling over, very quick
aguzzo spitzig subtle
molto aguzzo sehr spitzig very subtle
20 Ardito capriccioso ed assai mosso Keck, launig, reichlich bewegt jaunty, witty, amply eventful
elegante elegant
ardito keck jaunty
126
umoristico humorvoll with humor
loquace geschwätzig talkative
20, cont. Flatterzunge flutter-tongue
malizioso boshaft malicious
a rigore di tempo streng im Takt strict in tempo
sempre più affrettando immer hastiger in the same way, hurried
precipitando molto sich überstürzend hasty, hurried
23 Adagio appassionato (quasi recitativo) Rezitativisch frei (quasi Adagio passionato) slow, passionate, like a recitativ
pieno mit vollausladendem Ton with fully broad, prominent tone
r rallentando breit, zurückhaltend broad, slowing down
a accelerando rascher, eilend getting faster
aa accelerando assai sehr drängend getting much faster
r…a…a… lento da principio, poi langsam beginnend, rascher und drängender bis hastig slow to begin, then faster
stringendo sempre più fino al rapidissimo and much faster
24 Rapido quanto e possibile So rasch wie moglich. Mit durchweg spitzigem Ton As fast as possible, with sharpened
(con suono sempre aguzzo) tone throughout
aguzzo, con ironia nadelscharf, mit inronischem Ausdruck needle-sharp, with ironic
expression
ironico ironisch ironic
piccante scharf sharp
calando, ma sempre a tempo verhallend, doch straff im Tempo dying away, but in strict tempo
127
25 Un poco vivace e capriccioso Ziemlich bewegt, kapriziös quite vivacious/eventful, capricious
resolute resolute
kapriziös capricious
27 Un pochettino mosso (ben articolato) Leise bewegt (deutlich phrasiert) rather quiet, clearly phrased
28 Sciolto, elegante e rapido Flüissig, elegant, ziemlich geschwind liquid, elegant, and rather quickly
brillante brilliant
appassionato leidenschaftlich passionately
precipitando heftig fall suddenly
30 leggiero light
Veloce d brillante assai. Sehr rasch und brillant very fast and brilliant
ancora più mosso noch lebhafter again lively
Presto il più possibile. So rasch als möglich (dahinhuschend) as fast as possible
Sonoro breit broad
stringendo drängend getting faster
stringendo con agitazione drängend, unruhig bewegt getting faster with agitation
Rapidissimo äußerst rasch extremely fast
con molto slancio mit großem Wurf with large throw
le scale cromatiche nach Bleiben chromatische Skalen von *) bis **) ad lib with chromatic scale between
ad libitum da *) fino a **) asterisks
immer glänzender constantly shining
128
APPENDIX D
GEORGE MOREY
129
30 Caprices for Flute, Sigfrid Karg-Elert
12 5 2 6 C# C natural fair
13 2 1 2 Ab A natural good
14 6 3 14 Ab A natural fair
7 3 13 G# G natural good
17 3 2 12 Ab A natural ?
20 6 1 10 C# C natural good
23 5 1 4 D# D natural good
28 8 2 18 B natural Bb good
30 Var.18 1 8 Gb G natural ?
110
Dr. George Morey was Professor of Flute at the University of North Texas. This list has been edited to
include only the possible errata that exist in current editions. Dr. Morey’s complete list includes several
other errata that appear correctly in the Recital Publications edition.
130
APPENDIX E
131
Karg Elert’s Compositions with Flute in a Primary Role
Duration: 5 minutes
Duration: 11 minutes
Sonate B-dur, op.121 (1918), rev. as Trio Buccolico (see chamber music)
Duration: 15 minutes
Duration: 17 minutes
Sigfrid Karg-Elert
111
Wollinger, 35. Dr. Weber was a senior civil servant and loyal friend of Karg-Elert. He was later the
guardian of Karg-Elert’s daughter, Katherina (1914-1984).
112
Ibid, 43.
113
Ibid, 47. Walter Niemann (1876-1952)
132
Suite pointillistique, op.135 (1919)
Duration: 20 minutes
Chamber music
Duration: 19 minutes
Duration: 15 minutes
Other
Canzona, op. 81 (1912) for soloists, choir, flute obbligato, and organ
Thee” text, written in memory of the hymn played by the Titanic orchestra as the
ship was sinking. Karg-Elert’s friend Alfred Jochade died on that ship.115
114
This piece seems to anticipate the more popular “Youth” composition for chamber winds of Janáček,
yet there is no indication of correlation with Leoš Janáček’s Mládí [Youth], suite for flute &piccolo, oboe,
clarinet, horn, bassoon and bass clarinet of 1924/1925 .
115
Kaupenjohann, 8.
116
Wollinger, 75.
133
APPENDIX F
134
Preface.
These Caprices, as well as my other works for demands” on the part of the composer, the instrument would
flute, composed between 1915 and 1918 (Concerto, 2 scarcely have reached so high a degree of perfection.
Sonatas, Chamber Study, Symphonic Canzona, Etchings, The construction of the modern flute (especially
Partita, Suite Pointillistique, Monologues, Exotic the Boehm flute) is such as to reveal, with the greatest ease,
Impressions), owe their inception to the eminent artist Carl wonders which would have been considered almost
Bartužat, principal flautist of the Leipzig Theater and impossible only thirty years ago. The existing literature does
Gewandhaus-Orchestra, at whose side I played the oboe in a not nearly exhaust the unlimited technical possibilities. The
good military band during the war. typical modern literature has in especial hardly kept pace
The 30 Caprices originated from the urgent need with the development of the instrument, which is able to
of forming a connecting link between the existing educational produce greater variety than might be supposed from these
literature and the unusually complicated parts of modern works.
orchestral works by Richard Strauss, Mahler, Bruckner, The present Caprices take the classical technique
Reger, Pfitzner, Schillings, Schönberg, Korngold, Schrecker, of Bach, Händel and Mozart as their starting point and pass
Scrjabin, Strawinsky and the most modern virtuoso soli. rapidly to the style of to-day. In some passages will be found
They are therefore meant in the first place to serve as obvious instances of the influence of typical forms of the
technical preparation to these already existing works, viz: to Violin (springing bow, Cadence arpeggios,) and of
help the flautist, by means of progressive and special studies pianoforte technique (modern broken chords in elaborately
attain the high standard demanded by them. varying harmonies), suitably adapted. This higher
Besides this the Caprices explore new and development of style or form through the technique of
untrodden paths in technique; a technique which may be different instruments has from times of old played a very
required from one day to another in some new remarkable part in the history of technique.
impressionistic or expressionistic work. Sure signs are to be The enormous progress made in the domain of
seen that the demands made of the liveliest of all the harmony urgently demands a corresponding development of
woodwind instruments are rapidly increasing from year to intonation. Here, a clear recognition of the harmonic
year. functions is the chief essential needed by the flautist to solve
These Caprices are therefore meant to be a the given technical problems, if he would avoid leaping
synthesis of all the possible progressive technique demanded shortsightedly from one note to the next. Modern means of
by the character and construction of the modern flute, above expression that occur frequently are: Scales in major
all the unparalleled “Boehm flute”; and it was far from my seconds; in diatonic intervals interrupted by chromatics;
intention to write work that “lies easily in the fingers”. On chromatically repeating or recurring runs in curves; broken
the contrary, the student must learn what does not lie easily. major second progressions; broken fourths, fifths, major
All that is new and unaccustomed can obviously not lie easily sevenths and minor ninths (resp. augmented or diminished
at first. But the chief difficulty lies most often in the novelty octaves); major second chords and harmonised fourths in
of the constructive idea. Here it is quite impossible to arpeggios; chromatic or major second transpositions of large
achieve success without a rapid mental grasp of the formal or small groups or motives; suspensions and anticipations
structure, and an instantaneous grouping (as regards freely approached or quitted; parallel and extreme breaks of
harmony, phrasing and motive) of the lower parts, which two harmonically independent parts.
may, or may not, belong together. The appendix to these Rhythmical and metrical problems have been set,
studies: “Analysis of complicated technical forms”, should for the modern instrumentalist will only too frequently find
give useful hints in comprehending and memorizing the more himself confronted with similar tasks.
complicated figurations. Finally attention must be given to articulation and
The modern orchestral composer never considers phrasing, the difficulties of which must not be
the “convenient technique”, but, where needed, his desire for underestimated.
expression creates a new technique which often presents the When all the difficulties accumulated in this work
most difficult problem to the instrumentalists. Thus it is not have been mastered – needless to say, only after a very
only the virtuosi, but above all the composers (think of gradual increase of speed – there should hardly be an
Berlioz, Wagner, Richard Strauss, Mahler etc.) who have orchestra work which could present insuperable obstacles to
extended and are still extending the language of the the executant. The “difficult” will always grow easy by
instruments. The requirements of the virtuoso are more of a overcoming the “more difficult”.
physical, those of the composer of an aesthetic nature. The
former takes his starting-point from the natural technique,
based on the structure of the instrument (harmonies, position Leipzig, May 1919. Sigfrid Karg-Elert.
of keys or stops); the latter, on the other hand, has in mind
only the individual effect produced by the tone-quality of the
instrument. And unfortunately, these requirements are often
not compatible with the physical structure of the instrument.
It is then, as a third factor, that the instrument-maker
endeavors by his improvements, to increase the physical
characteristics of the instrument and hence to enlarge and
intensify its technical scope. Without apparently “impossible
135
APPENDIX G
MODERN CONFIGURATION
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Conely, Frank. 'Karg-Elert, Sigfrid', Grove Music Online ed. L. Macy (Accessed 25 May
2005), <http://www.grovemusic.com>.
Fabrikant, Harold, comp. The Harmony of the Soul: Sigfrid Karg-Elert’s Letters “To His
. Godfrey Sceats and Harold Fabrikant, trans. Your Ever Grateful, Devoted
Ferguson, Howard and Kenneth L. Hamilton. 'Study', Grove Music Online ed. L. Macy
Heim, Norman M. “The Clarinet Sonatas of Sigfrid Karg-Elert.” NACWPI Journal Fall
(1997): 3-5.
Karg-Elert, Sigfrid. Twenty-Five Caprices (and an atonal sonata). Ed. Jeffrey Lerner.
. 30 Capricen für Flöte allein: Opus 107 : ein "Gradus ad Parnassum" der
147
Entwicklung der modernen Figuration." Trans. Mrs. R.H. Elkin. Huntsville, TX.:
Kummer, Caspar. Six Caprices ou Exercices pour la Flûte seule, op. 12.
Mann, Alfred, trans and ed. The Study of Counterpoint from Johann Joseph Fux’s
Morey, George. Possible Erata for 30 Caprices for Flute, Sigfrid Karg-Elert.
Pellerite, James. J. A Handbook of Literature for the Flute. Third Edition. Bloomington,
Quantz, Johann Joachim. Capricen, Fantasien und Anfangsstücke für Flöte solo und mit
Randel, Don Michael, ed. The New Harvard Dictionary of Music. Cambridge: Belknap
Sceats, Godfrey. The Organ Works of Karg-Elert. London: Hinrichsen Edition Ltd.,
1950.
Surdell, Jacob Joseph. “Tonality, Form and Stylistic Features in Sergei Rachmininoff’s
Toff, Nancy. The Flute Book. New York: Oxford UP, 1996.
148
Waln, Ronald. “Sigfrid Karg-Elert’s Works for Wind Instruments.” NACWPI Journal
Young, Stephen Edward. “The Organ Works of Sigfrid Karg-Elert (1877-1933).” Ph.D.
149