Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aquino V Casabar
Aquino V Casabar
Peralta, J. either in the very action in which the services of a lawyer had
been rendered or in a separate action.
Facts:
- June 27, 2002, Atty. Domingo (now deceased) verbally The award that the court may grant to a successful party by way
contracted petitioner to represent him in an agrarian case of attorney’s fee is an indemnity for damages sustained by him
on a contingency fee basis in prosecuting or defending, through counsel, his cause in court.
- The case was for the determination of just compensation
for the expropriation and taking of Atty. Domingo’s In the instant case, the attorney’s fees being claimed by the
ricelands consisting of 60.5348 hectares in Guimba, Nueva petitioner is the compensation for professional services
Ecija by the DAR pursuant to PD 27 rendered, and not an indemnity for damages. Petitioner is
- Meanwhile, on September 30, 2007, Atty. Domingo died claiming payment from private respondents for the successful
- Petitioner filed a Manifestation dated December 11, 2007 of outcome of the agrarian case which he represented. There is no
the fact of Atty. Domingo's death and the substitution of valid reason why public respondent cannot pass upon a proper
the latter by his legal heirs, Ma. Ala F. Domingo and petition to determine attorney's fees considering that it is
Margarita Irene F. Domingo (private respondents) already familiar with the nature and the extent of petitioner's
- He then requested her to inform the Land Bank of the legal services.
segregation of petitioner's thirty percent (30%) contingent
attorney's fees out of the increase of the just compensation
for the subject property, or thirty percent (30%) of the total
increase
- Petitioner executed an Affidavit dated August 10, 2009,
attesting to the circumstances surrounding the legal
services he has rendered for the deceased Atty. Domingo
and the successful prosecution of the Agrarian case
Yes.