Well Control Hamilton
Well Control Hamilton
www.blowoutengineers.com
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
1.888.505.6346
www.blowoutengineers.com
www.sierra-hamilton.com
Ballooning ....................................................................... 27
Bullheading ..................................................................... 37
Balanced Plug.................................................................. 48
Stripping ......................................................................... 49
Snubbing ......................................................................... 56
Underground Blowout..................................................... 72
References
Disclaimer
No warranty is given concerning, and neither Blowout
Engineers nor its authors shall have any responsibility for,
the accuracy or completeness of any information
contained or referenced in this handbook. Neither Blowout
Engineers nor its authors shall be held responsible for any
errors, omissions or damages arising from the use of this
information. The publication of this handbook by Blowout
Engineers and its authors is for informational purposes
only and is not an attempt to render well control or any
other services. Please contact a qualified professional to
request assistance with any such services.
Abbreviations and Acronyms
The following abbreviated terms with associated units are used
throughout this reference guide unless otherwise stated for
specific formulas.
Gas Laws
Ideal Gas Law
𝑃×𝑉 =𝑛×𝑅×𝑇
Boyle's Law
𝑃1 × 𝑉1 𝑃2 × 𝑉2
=
𝑇1 𝑇2
Where
P = pressure of the gas, psi
V = volume of gas, ft3
n = number of moles, lb-mole
𝑓𝑡 3 𝑝𝑠𝑖
R = 10.73ᵒ𝑅 𝑙𝑏−𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒, universal gas constant
T = temperature of the gas, Rankine, ᵒR (ᵒR =ᵒF + 460)
General Flow Equations
General Flow Equation
𝑄 =𝐴×𝑉
Where
Q = Flow rate
A = Flow area
V = Flow velocity
0.000061 × 𝑀𝑊 × 𝐿 × 𝑄1.86
𝑃=
𝐼𝐷4.86
Where
P = Pressure, psi
MW = Mud weight, ppg
L = Length, ft
Q = Flow rate, gpm
ID = Pipe internal diameter, in.
1.4327 × 10−7 × 𝑀𝑊 × 𝐿 × 𝑉 2
𝑃=
𝐷ℎ − 𝐷𝑝
24.5 × 𝑄
𝑉=
𝐷ℎ 2 − 𝐷𝑝 2
Where
P = Pressure, psi
MW = Mud weight, ppg
L = Length, ft
V = Flow velocity, fpm
Dh= Hole diameter, in
Dp= Pipe diameter, in.
Q = Flow Rate, gpm
Annular Velocity
24.5 × 𝑄
𝐴𝑉 =
𝐷ℎ 2 − 𝐷𝑝 2
Where
AV = Annular velocity, ft/min
Q = Flow rate, gpm
Dh= Hole diameter, in
Dp= Pipe diameter, in
Pressure Change with Rate Change
𝑆𝑃𝑀2 2
𝑃2 = 𝑃1 × ( )
𝑆𝑃𝑀1
Where
P1 = Original pressure, psi
P2 = New pressure, psi
SPM1 = Original pump rate, SPM
SPM2 = New pump rate, SPM
Where
ΔPann = Friction pressure loss in the annulus, psi
YP = Yield Point of fluid, lb/100ft 2
L = Length, ft
Dh= Hole diameter, in
Dp= Pipe diameter, in
ECD
∆𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑛
𝐸𝐶𝐷 = + 𝑀𝑊
0.052 × 𝑇𝑉𝐷
𝑌𝑃
𝐸𝐶𝐷 = + 𝑀𝑊
11.7 × (𝐷ℎ − 𝐷𝑝 )
Where
ECD = Equivalent Circulating Density, ppg
ΔPann = Friction pressure loss in the annulus, psi
TVD = True Vertical Depth, ft
MW = Mud Weight, ppg
YP = Yield Point of fluid, lb/100ft 2
Dh= Hole diameter, in
Dp= Pipe diameter, in
(𝐼𝐷ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑒 2 − 𝑂𝐷𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 2)
𝐴𝐶𝐹 =
1029.4
Where
ACF = Annulus capacity factor, bbl/ft.
IDhole = Open hole or casing internal diameter, in
ODpipe = Pipe external diameter, in
Rectangular Tanks
𝑏𝑏𝑙
𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 ( ) = 0.178 × 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ × 𝑊𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ
𝑓𝑡
𝑏𝑏𝑙
𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 ( ) = 0.0148 × 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ × 𝑊𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ
𝑖𝑛
Horizontal Cylindrical Tanks with Tank Diameter in
Inches
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 2
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ ×
1029.4
Horizontal Cylindrical Tanks with Tank Diameter in
Feet
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑘 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 2
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 𝐿𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ ×
7.149
Where
Volume = Volume of tank, bbl
Capacity = Capacity of tank, bbl/ft or bbl/in
Tank Diameter = Diameter of circular tank, ft or in
Length = Length of rectangular tank, ft
Width = Width of rectangular tank, ft
Kick Causes and Detection
Kick Definition
A kick is an undesired influx of formation fluids into a wellbore.
Kicks can lead to catastrophic blowouts and other serious well
control events.
Causes of Kicks
There are several causes of kicks in drilling and workover
operations.
Insufficient mud weight
Improper hole monitoring
Improper hole fill while tripping
Swabbing while pulling the drill string
Loss of hydrostatic due to lost circulation
Pressure communication from another well
Large light weight spacers
Loss of hydrostatic pressure during cement transition
These causes are mostly avoidable with good pre-planning and
careful drilling practices.
Kick Detection
The primary indicators that a well is kicking are as follows:
Increase in flow while circulating
Flow with the pumps off
Pit gain
Improper hole fill while tripping
Secondary indicators of a kick can include the following:
Drilling break
String weight change
Water or oil cut mud
Decrease in pump pressure/increase in pump rate
Change in cuttings
Kick detection in oil or synthetic base mud can be masked to
some degree if the kick fluid is soluble within the mud. Gas and
oil kicks mix with the mud and therefore do not displace the
mud in the well as efficiently as with water base fluids.
Kicks in Oil or Synthetic Mud
Gas and oil are soluble in synthetic and oil base mud. The
amount of gas that can be solubilized depends on numerous
factors such as pressure and temperature. As a result, the
amount of gas entrained in these fluids at depth is more than
when the gas and mud are at the surface.
When circulating gas saturated mud from depth, the gas will
rapidly come out of solution when the mixture reaches its
bubble point pressure. This fact has resulted in several serious
blowouts and well control events.
The following are points to consider when using oil or synthetic
base mud:
Extended flow checks to allow sufficient gas to enter the
wellbore and saturate the oil base mud at the kick zone.
Controlled ROP in soft formations should be considered.
This will help prevent gas from the cuttings from
saturating the mud and "flashing out" when it reaches the
bubble point.
Kicks with MPD
When using Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD), a Coriolis meter
in the MPD equipment can be used to detect very small changes
in flow from the well while circulating. This tool is the most
sensitive kick detection tool in use at the present time and
should be considered when small margins between the pore
pressure and frac gradient are present.
Shut In Procedures
Minimizing the Kick
One of the most important philosophies in well control is
minimizing the kick size. The following rules of thumb are
related to kick size:
Large kicks result in high surface and downhole pressure
Large kicks result in high gas volumes when circulated out
Large kicks are more difficult to remove without
complications
Early kick detection and subsequently shutting the well in are
critical factors in successful kill operations.
Hard Shut In
A hard shut in requires that the drilling choke or HCR is closed
before shutting in the well.
A hard shut in offers the following advantages:
The procedure is faster
The kick size is smaller
The shut in procedure is easier to remember
The main disadvantage of a hard shut in is that a more intense
pressure wave is generated in the well when the BOP is closed.
This is referred to as a fluid hammer. There is some debate to
whether this pressure wave can be large enough to create a
formation fracture. There are many factors that must be
considered for this to be the case.
Shutting the well in using the annular, rather than using the
rams, results in a smaller pressure wave due to the longer
annular closing time. Closing the annular while the HCR is
closed is still considered a hard shut in.
Soft Shut In
A soft shut in requires a lengthier shut in sequence. The choke
and choke manifold must be open before closing the BOP in the
soft shut in method. Once the BOP is closed the choke is closed
and only then is the well completely shut in.
A soft shut in offers the following advantages
The pressure wave generated in the well is minimized
The SICP can be immediately read after closing the choke
The disadvantages of a soft shut in are as follows:
Longer time to accomplish
Larger kick
Higher casing pressure
There have been many instances in the past where the choke
was open and the well continued to flow but the rig crew
thought the well was shut in. This is the main hazard for the soft
shut in method.
Diverting
If the formation strength of the casing shoe is sufficiently weak
that the well may broach if a kick is taken and the well is shut
in, a diverter should be used. When a diverter is in use, the well
will never be shut in. The kick is directed through a large ID
line(s) to a safe place overboard or away from the rig.
Diverters are designed such that when the diverter (or annular)
is closed, the diverter line automatically opens. Overriding this
function to pressure test the diverter presents a situation where
a disastrous mistake can occur if the system is not returned to
normal operations before drilling ahead.
𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑂𝐷 2 − 𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝐼𝐷 2
𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 (𝑃𝐷𝐹) =
1029.4
𝐴𝑑𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡
𝑃𝐷𝐹 =
2751
𝑂𝐷 2
𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑 𝐸𝑛𝑑 𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 =
1029.4
𝐻𝑜𝑙𝑒 𝐼𝐷 2 − 𝐷𝑃 𝑂𝐷 2
𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑙𝑢𝑠 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 (𝐴𝐶𝐹) =
1029.4
𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝐼𝐷 2
𝑃𝑖𝑝𝑒 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 (𝑃𝐶𝐹) =
1029.4
Hydrostatic Pressure Drop per Foot When Pulling Dry Pipe
0.052 × 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 × 𝑃𝐷𝐹
∆𝑃 =
𝐴𝐶𝐹 + 𝑃𝐶𝐹
Hydrostatic Pressure Drop per Foot When Pulling Wet Pipe
𝑃𝐶𝐹 + 𝑃𝐷𝐹
∆𝑃 = 0.052 × 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 ×
𝐴𝐶𝐹
Where
PDP = Pipe Displacement Factor, bbl/ft
P = Pressure change (drop), psi
OD = Outer diameter, in
ID = Internal diameter, in
PCF = Pipe Capacity Factor, bbl/ft
Fluid Weight = Density of current wellbore fluid, ppg
ACF = Annular Capacity Factor, bbl/ft
Gas Cut Mud
Gas cut mud is a phenomenon that is common in drilling and
workover operations. This is especially true for water based
fluids.
There are several causes for gas cut mud.
The hydrostatic pressure in the well is underbalance to
the formation pressure. If the gas zone has high
permeability, a kick is the usual result. However, if the
formation has low permeability then gas cut mud could
occur.
If the formations drilled contain gas then gas from the
cutting can result in gas cut mud.
Buoyancy is likely the most common factor. Gas is lighter
than water and will migrate in the earth until it reaches a
trap (gas sand). When the bit penetrates the trap the gas
migration resumes into the wellbore. The result is gas cut
mud. This is also a cause of trip gas.
Due to Boyle's Law the gas at the bottom of the hole is
compressed and has very little effect on reducing the mud
weight at that depth. Almost all of the reduction in mud weight
occurs in the very top of the hole. Therefore, gas cutting has
little effect on the total hydrostatic pressure.
There are two equations that can be used to calculate the
hydrostatic pressure decrease due to gas cut mud.
Lapeyrouse et al present the following:
100 × (𝑀𝑊𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑢𝑡 − 𝑀𝑊𝑐𝑢𝑡 )
𝐻𝑃 𝐷𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑒 =
𝑀𝑊𝑐𝑢𝑡
Strong Equation
Where
HP Decrease = Decrease in hydrostatic pressure, psi
MWuncut = Original fluid weight, ppg
MWcut = Gas cut fluid weight, ppg
BHP = Bottom-hole pressure in, psi
The following chart illustrates the hydrostatic reduction for a
12000' TVD well.
18
17
16
18 ppg Mud
16 ppg Mud
14 ppg Mud
12 ppg Mud
10 ppg Mud
15
14
Well Depth=12000' TVD
13
ppg
12
11
10
9
8
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
psi
Hydrostatic Pressure Reduction
Pressure
Precharge
To Determine Number of Nitrogen Bottles
𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = 𝑆𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑐𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑠
The accumulator bank control fluid volume is the total volume needed to close all preventers and
HCR valves
N2
Fluid
Control
𝑈𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 50% 𝑅𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 = 150% × 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒
Pressure
Minimum
Volume
Fluid
Control
Working
Pressure
𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 × 𝐵𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 × 𝐵𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑙𝑒 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒
𝑈𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝐹𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑑 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 = ( × )−
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒
Mud Gas Separator Sizing
The Mud Gas Separator (MGS) is used to remove free gas from
the drilling fluids. The sizing of the MGS depends on several
components and how the system is installed. Take care when
referencing any "maximum" performance metrics, as these are
based on various assumptions that may not be relevant to all
scenarios.
There are two primary sizing components for the MGS:
The ID of the vessel
The "working" pressure of the vessel
The ID of the MGS impacts the retention time of the fluids for
separation. Insufficient time in the MGS can lead to gas-cut
fluids at the shakers. The retention time is also dependent on
the circulation rate of fluids into the MGS. Slower circulation
rates provide longer retention time in a vessel of the same size,
and therefore improve MGS performance.
The working pressure of the MGS changes with the height of the
mud leg and the density of fluid in the mud leg. The hydrostatic
pressure of the fluid in the mud leg gives the maximum
pressure that can be present in the MGS chamber without the
blow-through of gas/drilling fluids to the shakers or pits. This
establishes the fluid seal between the MGS and the pit system.
The internal pressure in the vessel is equal to the frictional
pressure of the gas flow exiting the MGS through the vent line.
Several factors can influence the frictional pressure in the vent
line and these are as follows:
The "effective" length of the vent line
o Effective length is the actual measured length, plus an
additional length that correlates to any bends in the
pipe
o The severity of the bend impacts the additional length
to be added.
The flow rate of gas through the vent line
The ID of the vent line
Any flow impediment devices in the vent line
o Ignition systems
o Back flow devices
The fluid seal would be lost if the working pressure in the MGS
exceeds the hydrostatic pressure of the mud leg. This condition
can present a significant safety hazard and should be avoided.
Should this occur, the following steps are advised:
Stop circulation and shut-in the well
Fill the MGS with fluid and prepare to restart the
circulation process
Lower the circulation rate
o Increase fluid retention time in the MGS
o Decrease the peak gas rates and resultant frictional
pressure in the vent line
There are several means to calculate the various aspects of MGS
sizing. In many cases, the installation cannot be modified
without significant effort, and the maximum values for the
system are desired. The following formulas have some
simplified assumptions to provide an estimate on what the MGS
system can handle.
Working Pressure for MGS
𝑊𝑃 = 0.052 × 𝑀𝑊 × 𝐻𝑚𝑙
Where
WP = Working pressure, psi
Hml = Height of mud leg, ft
MW = Mud weight of fluid in the MGS, ppg
The Weymouth Equation can be used to calculate the maximum
gas rate allowed through a MGS system, given a working
pressure. This equation has been simplified with some basic
assumptions and is as follows:
1/2
0.002876 × 𝑊𝑃 × (𝑊𝑃 + 29.4)
𝑄𝑔 = 1.1 × 𝐼𝐷 2.67 × ( )
𝐿𝐸
Where
𝑄𝑔 = Maximum gas rate for system, mmscf/d
ID = Internal diameter of the vent line, in
WP = Working pressure, psi
LE = Effective length of vent line, ft
Vent Line Bends Equivalent Lengths
Equivalent
Description Visual
Length
Round bend 1 ft
Sharp bend 70 ft
Sharp obtuse
15 ft
bend
Abrupt
10 ft
contraction
Abrupt expansion 20 ft
𝐼𝐷 2
𝐶𝐹𝑀𝐺𝑆 =
1029.4
𝑄𝑀𝐺𝑆 = 𝐶𝐹𝑀𝐺𝑆 × 8.4
𝑄𝑀𝐺𝑆
𝑀𝑎𝑥 𝐶𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 =
2
Where
CFMGS = Fluid capacity factor of MGS, bbl/ft
ID = Internal Diameter of the MGS, in
Max Circulation Rate = Kick circulation rate, bpm
QMGS = Flow rate in MGS, bpm
The following graph shows two curves for the MGS ID vs. the
circulation rate. The curves are for 500 and 1000 ft/min gas
migration rate.
14
12
10
Circulation Rates vs MGS ID
Circulation Rate
8
bbl/min
6
4
1000 ft/hr Migration Rate
500 ft/hr Migration Rate
2
0
60
50
40
30
20
10
in
MGS ID
Leak-Off Test
A leak-off test (LOT) is used to determine the point at which
fracture initiation occurs at the formation located just below the
casing shoe. This information can verify the formation can
withstand the wellbore pressure required to drill onto the next
casing setting depth. A LOT can also verify that the cement is
providing the proper isolation from weaker zones behind the
last casing string.
When new formation is exposed after drilling out the casing
shoe, drilling fluid of a constant density is slowly pumped into a
shut in (closed) wellbore while annular pressure and volume
pumped is monitored and plotted on a chart similar to the
accompanying graph.
The wellbore pressure will increase at a constant rate per unit
volume prior to any fracturing of the formation. This should be
a linear trend on the plot. At the first sign of a deviation from
this linear trend, the formation integrity has been breached and
the drilling fluid has begun to leak off (fracture initiation) into
the surrounding formation.
The pressure value at this point can be called the leak-off
pressure. It is important to remember that the leak-off pressure
is not where the pressure peaks, it is where the deviation from
the linear trend occurs. In the accompanying graph this point is
illustrated to be within the red circle.
It is important to remember that the leak-off pressure is not
where the pressure peaks, it is where the deviation from the
linear trend occurs. In the accompanying graph this point is
illustrated to be within the red circle
Information Gained from LOT
Leak off test are important for a number of reasons.
Leak-off pressure is the pressure at which the formation
will begin to fracture.
Leak-off pressure results dictate maximum drilling fluid
density and wellbore pressure to be used during
operations
Substantially lower values can indicate that cement
isolation from weaker shallow zones has not been
established. This may indicate the need to "squeeze" the
shoe.
Procedure
A basic procedure for a leak off test is as follows:
1. Once new formation is drilled, circulate wellbore to
ensure uniform drilling fluid density throughout.
2. Prepare a chart to plot annular pressure against volume
of drilling fluid pumped, set up similar to the figure
below.
3. Close the selected BOP and slowly pump drilling fluid
into the wellbore with constant strokes, noting casing
pressure, drillpipe pressure, volume of fluid pumped and
stroke count. The drillpipe pressure and casing pressure
will increase as more drilling fluid is pumped into the
wellbore
4. Carefully monitor the casing pressure and volume
pumped. The red circled area in the figure denotes the
leak-off pressure. This occurs when values deviate from
the linear trend. Stop pumping drilling fluid
5. Observe pressure for a period of 10 minutes to ensure
pressure stabilization.
20
16
12
bbl
8
4
0
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
psi
Casing Pressure
Where
MAASP = Maximum Allowable Annular Surface Pressure, psi
PFrac = Fracture pressure at the casing shoe, psi
KImax = Maximum Kick Intensity at zero volume influx, ppg
There are certain assumptions made in these equations.
Accounts for no hydrostatic pressure of the kick fluids.
Incompressible wellbore fluids.
No temperature and pressure effects on the well fluids.
Does not account for friction or circulation of fluids.
MAASP assumes drilling fluid to the casing shoe from the
surface, i.e. no kick fluids above the shoe.
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑡 = 0.056704
The final density for each section can be calculated from the
following:
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑀𝑊𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 + 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑀𝑊𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑒 + 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝐷𝑆 𝑀𝑊𝐷𝑆
𝑀𝑊𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 =
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙
The ESD at the end of each section, and for the entire well can
be then calculated using the determined corrected mud weights.
Ballooning
The term "ballooning" generally refers to the flow back of fluids
previously lost into a formation. The pressure associated with
ballooning is typically a function of the fracture initiation and
fracture closure pressures of the rock. There is also generally a
finite volume of fluids for the ballooning system. As a volume of
fluids are taken back into the well from the formation, the
associated pressure is reduced.
Ballooning generally occurs while circulating when the
Equivalent Circulating Density (ECD) is higher than the
pressure required to open a fracture in the ballooning
formation. When circulation is stopped and the Equivalent
Static Density (ESD) at the formation is less than the fracture
closure pressure, lost fluids will reenter the wellbore, giving the
perception of a kick.
Fingerprinting can be used to assist with the determination of a
well that is kicking as opposed to ballooning. The flowback of
fluids upon each connection should show a decreasing flow rate
trend and should match those of previous connections.
Pressure build fingerprinting can also be completed to show a
reduction in the pressure related to time when compared to a
consistent volume of fluid bled back. The following chart shows
an example of a ballooning well. Three bleed cycles were
complete and the pressure build was plotted over time for
comparison. The decreasing trend can be noted which was
instrumental in the conclusion that ballooning was the source of
flow realized from the well.
600
Controlled Build Up #2
Controlled Build Up #1
Controlled Build Up #3
500
400
Pressure Build After Bleed Cycle
minutes
Time
300
200
100
0
450
350
250
150
psi
Pressure
Where
KMW = Kill Mud Weight, ppg
SIDPP = Shut In Drillpipe Pressure, psi
TVD = True Vertical Depth, ft
OMW = Original Mud Weight, ppg
ICP = Initial Circulating Pressure, psi
FCP = Final Circulating Pressure, psi
SPR = Slow Pump Rate Pressure, psi
ACF = Annular Capacity Factor, bbl/ft
dinflux = Density of the influx, ppg
SICP = Shut In Casing Pressure, psi
SIDPP = Shut In Drillpipe Pressure, psi
Kick Circulation
Engineer’s Method
Also known as Wait and Weight or the Balanced Method, the
Engineer’s Method can be used to kill a well in one circulation
when circulating on bottom. Kill fluid is pumped into the well in
order to circulate out a kick (influx) and exert the needed
hydrostatic pressure to overbalance the formation. Bottom-hole
pressure (BHP) should remain constant throughout the
procedure.
Procedure
The following is a basic procedure for the Engineer's Method:
1. Shut the well in.
2. Record stabilized casing and drillpipe pressures. Note pit
level.
3. Perform all necessary calculations with the equations
provided
4. Develop a pumping schedule.
5. Increase the mud weight to the calculated kill mud
weight.
6. Manage the wellbore pressure using the volumetric
method, if needed, while the mud density in the pits is
increased.
7. Hold casing pressure constant while bringing the pump(s)
to kill rate.
8. Upon reaching the kill rate, note the Initial Circulating
Pressure (ICP) on the drillpipe. This will be the value to
use for ICP on the pump schedule.
a. NOTE: Should ICP value on drillpipe gauge differ from
calculations within a reasonable amount, use gauge
value and adjust pump schedule accordingly.
9. Follow pump schedule for the drillpipe pressure making
the necessary adjustments to reduce the drillpipe
pressure as needed.
10.When kill weight fluid reaches the bit, this is the value for
Final Circulating Pressure (FCP).
11. Hold drillpipe pressure constant at FCP and continue to
circulate kill fluid to the surface.
12. Once the kick is safely removed, shut the well in and
verify casing and drillpipe pressure equal 0 psi. Any
trapped pressure in the wellbore system may need to be
bled off.
Advantages
Some advantages of the Engineer's Method are as follows:
The well is killed with a single circulation.
Generally lower overall wellbore pressures.
o Lower expected pressure at the shoe.
The pressure throughout the entire wellbore should be
reduced as compared to the Driller's method.
Disadvantages
Some disadvantages of this method are as follows:
Requires materials on hand to weight up the fluid.
Fluid weight up is not required on all kick scenarios.
Time is required to weight up mud.
o Gas migration is a time sensitive issue in a water-based
mud system.
Equations
𝑆𝐼𝐷𝑃𝑃
𝐾𝑀𝑊 = + 𝑂𝑀𝑊
0.052 × 𝑇𝑉𝐷
𝐼𝐶𝑃 = 𝑆𝐼𝐷𝑃𝑃 + 𝐾𝑅𝑃𝑃
𝐾𝑀𝑊 × 𝐾𝑅𝑃𝑃
𝐹𝐶𝑃 =
𝑂𝑀𝑊
𝐷𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝐵𝑖𝑡 =
𝑃𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝐵𝑖𝑡
𝑃𝑢𝑚𝑝 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑡𝑜 𝐵𝑖𝑡 =
𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑘𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒
Where
KMW = Kill Fluid Weight, ppg
SIDPP = Shut In Drillpipe Pressure, psi
TVD = True Vertical Depth, ft
OMW = Original Mud Weight, ppg
ICP = Initial Circulating Pressure, psi
FCP = Final Circulating Pressure, psi
SPR = Slow Pump Rate Pressure, psi
Comments
Engineer’s Method Kill Schedule
Pressure
Drillpipe
Volume
Strokes
Gas Migration
Gas migration occurs whenever there is a density difference
between the gas and the fluid in the well. This is basically a
gravity phenomenon. As such, a height difference is required. In
a well that means there must be a TVD difference.
Gas migration rates vary widely and can be as much as 4000
ft/hr. The migration rate depends on several factors:
The density difference between the gas and the fluid in the
well. Gas migrates faster in heavier fluids.
The viscosity of the fluid in the well. Gas migrates faster in
water than heavy mud.
The migration path. A tortuous path will retard gas
migration (liner top, packer leak etc.).
Oftentimes heavier mud will have a higher viscosity. This may
affect the migration rate.
A common misconception is that there is no gas migration in oil
base mud. A "free" gas bubble will migrate in oil bas mud. Once
the oil base mud becomes saturated, the bubble migrates.
However, as the bubble reaches unsaturated oil mud some of
the gas goes into solution until the mud is saturated.
Suffice it to say that large gas bubble in oil base mud will
migrate similar to the same size bubble in water base mud.
The gas migration height is equal to the hydrostatic pressure of
the mud that falls below the gas bubble. Knowing the height
that the bubble migrated in a certain period of time will yield
the gas migration rate.
Gas Migration Formulas
𝑃2 − 𝑃1
𝐻𝑚 =
0.052 × 𝑀𝑊
𝐻𝑚
𝐺𝑚 =
∆𝑡
Where
Hm = Height of migration, TVD ft
P1 = Initial SICP
P2 = Final SICP
Gm = Gas migration rate, ft/hr
Δt = Time interval from P1 to P2, hrs
MW = Fluid weight, ppg
This is a calculation of the actual migration of the gas bubble. It
is not a prediction of the migration rate before a kick is taken.
Assumptions associated with the formula are as follows:
No fluids are lost (closed wellbore system).
No volume change in the gas bubble.
o No height change in the bubble.
o Consistent well geometry.
The fluid through which the migration is occurring is
incompressible.
No temperature change.
Kick Handling
Lube and Bleed
Lube and bleed is a method used to remove gas from a wellbore,
while managing the BHP so that is does not drop below the
initial starting value. This is accomplished by pumping a liquid
into the well's void space (area at the surface occupied by the
gas) and bleeding off a specific amount of pressure from the
well by releasing gas only.
Important Concepts to Remember
Successful lube and bleed operations depend on the following:
Only bleed gas
Gas must be present at the surface to lube and bleed (or
there is no void space to insert fluid into the well)
Hydrostatic pressure added and the pressure increase
from pumping (compression of the gas bubble) must be
bled off after each pump cycle
Set the pressure boundaries suitable to the wellbore
limitations (casing shoe, surface pressure limits, etc.)
General Procedure
An example lube and bleed procedure is as follows:
1. Set pressure/volume limits for pumping cycle.
2. Confirm that gas is present at the surface.
a. Note the initial SICP
3. Pump the desired volume of lubricating fluid into the
wellbore.
4. Allow for the liquid lubricating fluid to swap with the gas
in the well.
5. Bleed the pressure on the casing back to the initial SICP
at the beginning of the pump cycle.
6. Bleed off an additional pressure increment that is
equivalent to the hydrostatic pressure added to the well
by the pumped lubrication fluid.
7. Repeat until gas is removed. When all gas has been
removed, lube and bleed is finished. The well may/may
not be dead at this point.
Formulas
The added hydrostatic pressure is calculated as follows:
Calculate the height (pipe only or annulus) of the lubricating
fluid column based on the pumped volume:
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑢𝑏 × 1029.4
ℎ𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 = 2
𝐼𝐷𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑢𝑏 × 1029.4
ℎ𝐴𝑛𝑛 = 2 2
𝐼𝐷𝐶𝑆𝐺 − 𝑂𝐷𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒
𝑃ℎ𝑦𝑑 = 0.052 × ℎ × 𝑀𝑊
Where:
HAnn = Height of the lubricated fluid in an annulus, ft
hpipe = Height of the lubricated fluid in pipe, ft
Vollub = Volume of lubricated fluid per cycle, bbl
Phyd = Hydrostatic pressure increase from lubricating fluid, psi
MW = Lubricating fluid weight, ppg
Kick Handling
Volumetric Method
The volumetric well control method is to be used when normal
circulation is compromised. While regulating the bottom-hole
pressure, the kick is allowed to migrate to the surface by
bleeding calculated volumes of mud out. Once gas has reached
the surface, the volumetric procedure is complete. Removal of
the gas can be completed by lube and bleed, or other well
control methods.
Below are some examples of when the volumetric method
should be used (volumetric control is generally only needed if
circulation is not possible):
Casing pressure increase due to gas migration would
reach unacceptable point before circulation could begin
Off bottom but gas kick is below the bit (circulation would
not remove the kick)
Pumps are unable to be used
Plugged drill string or bit and cannot circulate
The well is shut in on the blind rams and there is no
means of circulation.
Procedure
A basic procedure for the Volumetric Method is as follows:
1. Record initial SICP.
2. Select a safety factor and working margin. Margins should
be selected based on the well limitations. The working
margin may also be known as the pressure increment.
3. Calculate the mud increment. The mud increment is the
mud volume to be bled off, reducing the hydrostatic
pressure in the well by the amount of pressure increase
from the working margin. It can be determined using the
following equation:
𝑊𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛 × 𝐴𝐶𝐹
𝑀𝑢𝑑 𝐼𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 =
0.052 × 𝑀𝑢𝑑 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡
4. Allow casing pressure to rise by predetermined safety
factor. This will allow the BHP to increase by the safety
factor and will provide extra overbalance. This pressure
will NOT be bleed off.
5. Allow casing pressure to rise further by predetermined
working margin. The BHP will increase by the working
margin amount.
6. Accurately bleed off mud increment into a measuring
tank (like the trip tank) while maintaining a constant
casing pressure. This should decrease the hydrostatic
pressure in the well by the working margin amount,
reducing the BHP back to the original value prior to the
increase from the working margin.
7. Repeat step 5 and 6 while recording casing pressure,
calculating bottom-hole pressure, and tracking mud
volumes bled off.
8. Stop the bleeding process when gas enters the choke. Kick
is now to surface.
9. Proceed with additional operations to remove kick and
kill the well.
Bullheading
The term bullheading implies that a well is shut-in and fluids
are being pumped into the wellbore and causing additional
wellbore fluids to exit at a given point.
Bullheading can be completed at slow rates, although it is most
desirable to pump at a rate that is sufficient to exceed the rate of
gas migration and effectively "sweep" the wellbore of any gas.
The dominant factor in bullheading is the hydrostatic exchange
that occurs between the pumped and exiting fluids being
displaced from the well. Generally, it is beneficial to calculate
the pump pressure schedule for a bullheading operation.
Bullheading Formula
𝐼𝐷 2 𝐼𝐷 2 − 𝑂𝐷 2
𝐶𝐹 = 𝑜𝑟
1029.4 1029.4
1
ℎ=
𝐶𝐹
∆𝑃𝑏𝑏𝑙 = ℎ × (𝑀𝑊𝑚 − 𝑀𝑊𝑤 ) × 0.052
Where
CF = Capacity Factor for the flow path, bbls/ft
ID = Internal diameter of pipe, in
OD = Outer diameter of pipe, in
h = height of the pumped fluid per bbl pumped, ft
MWm = density of pumped fluid, ppg
MWw = density of well fluid, ppg
∆𝑃𝑏𝑏𝑙 = Surface pressure change per bbl of fluid pumped, psi
This formula does not account for pressure build-up in the
wellbore, only the hydrostatic exchange between the pumped
and wellbore fluids.
Important Concepts to Remember:
Bullheading generally results in fracturing the wellbore,
but not in all cases.
o Fracturing will often occur near the last casing shoe
because that is generally the weakest exposed
formation.
Wells with long open-hole sections are poor candidates
because the kill fluid typically only makes it to the casing
shoe, or highest weak zone in the well.
The optimum pump rate should be greater than the rate
of gas migration to ensure minimal gas in the well after
pumping.
Trapped Pressure
Pressure on a well after kill operations can be the result of
trapped pressure induced during the kill circulation. There have
been a multitude of well control jobs that were the result of
bleeding the well and assuming that pressure on the well was
trapped pressure when it was actually the result of a kick.
Checking for trapped pressure can be safely accomplished
without allowing an additional kick into the well if done
properly.
Bleed Outline
The following outline can be used to bleed trapped pressure.
Modification of this outline can be made to bleed a small
volume of fluid in the well instead of a small pressure as is in
this procedure.
Record the pressure. This is the starting pressure.
Ensure that the pressure is stable for at least 30 minutes.
Pick a small pressure increment to bleed (50-150 psi).
Line up the choke manifold to the trip tank so that the
volume bled can be accurately measured.
Bleed the small pressure increment (50-150 psi) slowly
and close the choke.
Observe and record the pressure.
Allow the pressure to stabilize.
If the pressure returns to or rebounds above the starting
pressure, stop the bleed process. This indicates the well is
likely balanced to the reservoir pressure.
If the pressure after bleeding does not return to the
starting pressure, consider an additional bleed cycle.
The main point to remember is that the pressure after bleeding
should be less than the starting pressure. If the pressure after
any bleed cycle rebounds to or above the starting pressure, the
well is likely balanced to the reservoir pressure. Additional
bleeding at this point will cause the well to be underbalanced
and the well will kick during the bleed cycle.
If an additional kick is taken while attempting to bleed trapped
pressure it will have to be removed by a kill circulation or
expanded to the surface by volumetric control before the well
can be checked for trapped pressure again.
Best Practices
Here are a few tips to consider when bleeding trapped pressure.
Bleeding trapped pressure should be done through a
choke. Never bleed trapped pressure through a gate valve.
A lo-torq valve should also be avoided when bleeding
trapped pressure back to a cement unit if possible.
If gas is present during the bleed cycles, lube and bleed
procedures should be followed to replace the gas pressure
with fluid hydrostatic.
Always measure the bleed volume. Bleeding the well
through the mud-gas separator can lead to measurement
errors if the separator is not full. Bleed the well to a trip
tank.
Ensure that the gauge in use for the bleed operation is in
good working order. Try to use the same gauge for all
bleed cycles as using multiple gauges can lead to
confusion.
Boyle’s Law
Boyle’s Law stems from the ideal gas law at constant
temperature and is simplified to the following equation in order
to compare a gas bubble at different points of interest:
𝑃1 × 𝑉1 = 𝑃2 × 𝑉2
Where
P1 = Pressure at condition 1
V1 = Volume at condition 1
P2 = Pressure at condition 2
V2 = Volume at condition 2
Concepts to remember:
Does not account for temperature change
Does not account for compressibility of gas
P1V1 = P2V2 can be rearranged into a ratio to solve for an
unknown property.
Example: What will the volume of a 10 bbl gas kick be at
Location 2?
Location 2:
Bubble migration
and expansion
P2 = 300
V2 = ?
Kick volume V2
will be 90 bbl at
Location 2
Location 1:
Kick Detected
P1 = 2700
V1 = 10
𝑃1 × 𝑉1 = 𝑃2 × 𝑉2
Where
PBHP = Bottom-hole pressure, psi
VDOI = Kick volume at the depth of investigation, bbl
VPitGain = Initial pit gain caused by kick, bbl
PDOI = Pressure at the depth of investigation, psi
The following two graphs provide a means for a rough
estimation of surface casing pressure when a 0.5 ppg kick has
been taken. Assumptions were made in order to create these
graphs. One assumption made is the annulus size of 8.5 in x 5
in. Another assumption is the TVD value for each chart was
assumed to be 7000 ft and 8500 ft respectively.
To estimate surface casing pressure by using the chart, begin at
the pit gain value on the vertical axis. Trace that value to the
corresponding fluid weight line, depending on the fluid weight
that is currently in the well. Trace from the fluid weight curve
down to the horizontal axis to find an estimation for surface
casing pressure. These charts will provide an estimation for
surface casing pressure only if the well in question is of a similar
kick size, wellbore geometry, depth, and fluid weight.
Kick Volume at Depth Kick Volume at Depth
TVD of 7,000 feet TVD of 8,500 feet
55 55
Assumptions
50 Assumptions 50
- 0.5 ppg kick
- 0.5 ppg kick - 8 1/2" x 5 " annulus
45 - 8 1/2" x 5 " annulus 45
40 40
MW In Hole
35 10.0 ppg 35
11.0 ppg
12.0 ppg MW In Hole
30 30
13.0 ppg 10.0 ppg
bbl
bbl
14.0 ppg 11.0 ppg
Pit Gain
Pit Gain
25 25
15.0 ppg 12.0 ppg
20 20 13.0 ppg
14.0 ppg
15 15 15.0 ppg
10 10
5 5
0 0
500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100 500 700 900 1100 1300 1500 1700 1900 2100
Where
Ppoint = the pressure at a given point in the wellbore, psi
Psurface = the surface pressure of the well. This is known as the
surface component, psi
MW= the fluid density within the wellbore, ppg
0.052 x ρ x depth = the hydrostatic component, psi
Using the given information and above equation:
0 psi ? psi
8.33 ppg
9.6 ppg
7500 ft
10,000 ft TVD
Where
BHP = Bottom-hole Pressure, psi
HP = hydrostatic pressure at a given point, psi
SICP = Shut In Casing Pressure, psi
The example above displays the importance of adding surface
pressure to balance a U-tube. Having different fluid densities
throughout the well produces a different hydrostatic pressure to
act against the formation. If the hydrostatic pressure is too low,
it causes the well to be underbalanced to the formation and may
induce a kick. Maintaining a constant BHP is imperative to any
well control operation and can be done by manipulating surface
pressure.
Gas Flow Equations
Estimating the gas flow rate from a well can be beneficial in a
number of situations. Practical applications in which field
personnel find the estimated gas flow rate from a well useful
include the following:
Kick circulation
Mud gas separator performance
Blowout control
There are numerous variables that are needed to determine the
gas flow rate from a well accurately. However, knowing the
many variables involved is rarely possible. Therefore
assumptions must be used to make best estimate guesses.
Choke Flow Equation
The equation used to determine the gas flow rate through a
choke is as follows:
𝑘+1
2 2𝑘−2
𝑄 = 𝐶 × 𝐴 × (𝑔 × 𝑘 × 𝑑 × 𝑝)0.5 × ( )
𝑘+1
Where
Q= gas mass flow rate, lb/s
C= choke coefficient (usually 0.72)
A= choke area, ft2
g= 32.2 ft/s2
k=gas specific heat ratio
d=gas density at upstream pressure, lb/ft3
p=upstream pressure lb/ft2
The Gas Flow Through Choke graph uses the following
assumptions and shows the flow for three different choke sizes.
gas specific heat ratio= 1.27
surface gas density = 0.458 lb/ft3
choke coefficient = 0.72
The upstream gas density was calculated assuming a z=0.8 and
gas temperature = 85oF.
Estimate from Flame Length
There are several equations that are used to calculate the gas
flow rate from the length of a flame. The calculations are for
single exit low pressure flares.
The API has a flame length calculation in its API Standard 521
as follows:
𝑓𝑙 = 0.0604 × 𝑄 0.4776
Where
fl = flame length, ft
Q =heat release rate, BTU/hr
This equation is for sub-sonic flow rates such as those found on
a mud-gas separator vent line. Sonic velocity flow occurs
whenever the vent line exit pressure is approximately 1.8 times
greater than the downstream pressure. This is ±26 psig for a
typical natural gas flow to the atmosphere. This situation can
occur whenever a well is flowing through a diverter system.
The Flame Length vs. Gas Flow Rate graph shows the gas flow
rate for two different gas quality values (BTU/scf).
Natural Gas
Flame Length vs. Gas Flow Rate Gas Flow Through Choke
5000
100
4000
80
3000
60
ft
psi
0.25 in Choke
Flame Length
950 BTU/scf
40 2000 0.50 in Choke
1150 BTU/scf
Choke Pressure
0.75 in Choke
20 1000
0 0
0 5 10 15 20 0 20 40 60
Gas Flow Rate
mmscfd
Gas Flow Rate
mmscfd
Gas Dispersion
Gas Dispersion in blowout situations is important for a number
of reasons.
Safety of personnel at the site
Safety of the general public near the site
Environmental considerations
Gas plume modeling calculations can be performed to
determine gas concentrations from a blowout. These programs
take into account the weather and surrounding terrain to
determine concentration of gas in the surrounding area. The
resulting concentration profiles can usually be plotted on a
map. These maps are very useful in well control response
management.
Computer programs can also be used to calculate the heat flux
(radiant heat) if the well is on fire. It is important to remember
that heat flux is different than temperature. Heat flux is the
amount of energy acting on an area. This is what exposed skin
feels.
Explosive Limits
An explosion in the oilfield is usually understood as sudden
release of energy. Detonation is a fire in which the flame front
travels at the speed of sound. Deflagration is a fire that burns at
sub-sonic speed.
Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) and Lower Flammability Limit
(LFL) are generally the same term.
Methane is assumed to be the main component of natural gas.
Therefore, the term (LEL) commonly used in the oilfield refers
to the LEL for methane. The LEL in air for methane is 5%. This
means that if the atmosphere contains 5% by volume of gas an
explosion will occur in the presence of a heat source.
The Upper Explosive Limit (UEL) in air for methane is 15%.
Concentrations above this limit will not burn because there is
not sufficient oxygen available to support combustion even if a
heat source is present.
Gas detectors read a percentage of the LEL. A 10% LEL reading
calculates to be 0.5% methane in the air. This is well below the
LEL. However, this percentage of LEL is generally considered
too high for working.
The LEL and UEL for compounds commonly found in the
oilfield are given in the following table:
Explosive Limits
Compound LEL UEL%
Kerosene 0.6% 4.9%
Diesel 0.6% 7.5%
Gasoline 1.4% 7.6%
Butane 1.6% 8.4%
Propane 2.1% 9.5%
Methane 5.0% 15.0%
Methanol 6.0% 36.0%
Hydrogen Sulfide 4.3% 46.0%
Balanced Plug
Balanced plugs can be cement, barite or some other fluid that is
spotted with a work string at a specific location within a
wellbore. The “balanced” term implies that the hydrostatic
pressures in the annulus, and inside the pipe, are the same at
equal vertical depths.
When properly designed, the plug should remain in place after
pumping and not move due to fluid imbalance. The work string
can be left in place or pulled from the plug.
Assumptions with the following formulas:
There are no geometry changes in the pipe or casing.
Does not account for tool joints.
Assumes no excess in plug volumes
General Procedure:
1. Select the plug height.
2. Calculate the volume for the plug:
a. Inside the pipe
b. In the casing by pipe annulus
3. Select the height of the spacer.
4. Calculate the volume of the spacer:
a. Inside the pipe
b. In the casing by pipe annulus
5. Calculate the volume of displacement.
The plug volume is calculated as follows:
2
𝐼𝐷𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 ×ℎ
𝑃𝑙𝑢𝑔 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 =
1029.4
2 2
(𝐼𝐷𝐶𝑆𝐺 − 𝑂𝐷𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 )×ℎ
𝑃𝑙𝑢𝑔 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝐴𝑛𝑛 =
1029.4
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑙𝑢𝑔 𝑉𝑜𝑙 = 𝑃𝑙𝑢𝑔 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑝𝑖𝑝𝑒 + 𝑃𝑙𝑢𝑔 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝐴𝑛𝑛
Where
Plug Vol = plug volume, bbls
Spacer Vol = spacer volume, bbls
h = height in MD with pipe in the plug, ft
Dis Vol = displacement volume, bbls
HF = final height of plug with pipe removed, ft
Concepts to remember:
Spacers need to be balanced (same density).
Displacement fluid needs to be balanced with remaining
wellbore fluids.
Displacement volume can be reduced to allow the plug to
"fall" into place and allow dry pipe at the surface.
Stripping
Stripping is defined as running pipe into a wellbore with surface
pressure present, without the use of an outside force (i.e. the
pipe falls in the well due to its weight). Stripping can be
completed with the use of:
An annular BOP
Annular to ram BOP
Ram to Ram BOP
Rotating Control Device (RCD) or "rotating head"
Important Concepts to remember:
Stripping is "tripping" pipe with surface pressure present
in the "pipe heavy" condition.
Casing pressure should be held constant by bleeding fluid
from the well while stripping in the hole. The volume of
fluids bled should be compared to the calculated value of
the actual pipe that is being inserted.
A surge bottle can be added to the annular hydraulic line
on the CLOSE side to assist with stripping. This can limit
the wear on the annular and provide increased life for the
elastomer.
Formulas
(𝑃𝐶𝐹 + 𝑃𝐷𝐹) × 𝐿𝑠
ℎ𝑠 =
𝐴𝐶𝐹
∆𝑃 = (𝑀𝑊 − 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑢𝑥 ) × 0.052 × ℎ𝑠
Where
hs = height increase of influx from stripping pipe, ft
Ls= feet of pipe stripped into influx, ft
PCF = Pipe Capacity Factor, bbl/ft
PDF = Pipe Displacement Factor, bbl/ft
ACF = Annulus Capacity Factor, bbl/ft
MW = Mud Weight in the well, ppg
dinflux = density of the influx, ppg
DP = pressure change due to increased height of influx, psi
Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)
Common facts about H2S:
Molecular Weight = 34.08
Specific Gravity = 1.1767 (air = 1.00)
Typically measure in Parts Per Million (ppm)
Conversion of ppm into a percentage (%):
𝑝𝑝𝑚
=%
10,000
Percentage conversion into ppm:
𝑝𝑝𝑚 = (%)(10,000)
Immediately Dangerous to Life and Health (IDLH) limit
is set by OSHA at a concentration of 100 ppm
Rapid unconsciousness and death at 700 ppm
Flammability range: Volume % in air mixture
o Lower = 4.30%
o Upper = 46.0%
Burning H2S produces SO2 (Sulfur Dioxide) which also
poses serious health risks, including death in larger
concentrations.
2𝐻2 𝑆 + 3𝑂2 → 2𝑆𝑂2 + 2𝐻2𝑂
Barite Plugs
Barite plugs have been used in well control situations to slow
down or stop a well flow. These situations are usually
underground crossflows. The intent of setting a barite plug is to
provide a mechanical barrier to stop the flow. The barrier is
intended to be a non-permeable bridge at (or near) the flowing
formation.
Specific density of pure barite mineral is 4.48 g/cc
Specific gravity of oilfield barite is generally considered
4.2. Some barite can have a specific gravity as low as 4.1.
Specific volume of 4.2 sg barite is 0.0286 gal/lbm = 2.86
gal/100# sack.
Barite Plug "Rules of Thumb":
Tends to work better in a gas flow situation. The intent is
to have the gas lift the carrier fluid out and have the barite
settle to form the plug.
Batch mix the plug for pumping and keep it moving to
prevent the barite from settling at the surface.
Most barite plugs are mixed to a slurry density of 18.0–
21.0 ppg.
A thinner is typically applied to the mixture to further aid
in barite settling.
Do not stop pumping the plug until it is in place. Stopping
the movement of the plug may allow it to settle at an
undesired location.
Typically, suspension agents are not used in the fluid
mixture as the intent is to allow the barite to settle out.
Pilot test the mixtures for the best results and to ensure
that the barite will settle sufficiently.
Engage the assistance of a specialist when pumping barite
pills. Experience will generally always add value to any
operations when special techniques are applied.
In many cases, 2 or more barite plugs are needed to stop
the flow.
Caution is always advised when using this type of technique.
The consequences to further operations need to be considered
in the event that the plug sets in an undesired location, or the
plug is unsuccessful at stopping the flow. It is possible for
further well intervention operations to be limited and/or
compromised from the application of a barite plug.
The table below displays the properties of a 50 bbl barite plug
for varying densities.
50 bbl Barite Plugs
Settled
Density Water Barite Total Slurry
Volume
18.0 ppg 50 bbl 410 sx 77 bbl 27 bbl
19.0 ppg 50 bbl 490 sx 83 bbl 33 bbl
20.0 ppg 50 bbl 570 sx 89 bbl 39 bbl
21.0 ppg 50 bbl 665 sx 95 bbl 45 bbl
The formula for mixing a barite plug with water and barite only
is as follows:
14.7 × (𝑀𝑊𝑝𝑙𝑢𝑔 − 8.33)
𝑉=
35 − 𝑀𝑊𝑝𝑙𝑢𝑔
Where
V = Sacks of barite/bbl water
MWplug = Barite plug density, ppg
Stuck Pipe
Stuck pipe typically falls into one of the following categories:
Differentially stuck
Mechanically stuck
Pipe Stretch Calculations
The formulas below can be used to determine the stuck point
based on the properties of steel and a measured length change
(elastic deformation of steel) due to a known force. In other
words, the equations calculate the shallowest point where a
string of pipe is stuck. The differential force is created by
movement of the string.
Where
Weight1 = Initial weight indicator reading, lbf
Weight2 = Final weight indicator reading, lbf
AreaSteel = Cross-sectional area of the pipe, in2
CFP = Free-point Constant
Stretch = Measured stretch from Weight 1 to Weight2, in
LF = Length of free pipe, ft
Sonic Stuck Pipe Log
In a well control situation, it is generally not recommended to
move the pipe through a BOP. Pipe movement through a BOP
can cause the sealing element to fail, which is not acceptable.
Most free-point tools require the stuck string to be moved while
tools are in the pipe. A sonic stuck pipe log is generally
preferred in a situation where a BOP is closed because no pipe
movement is required.
The theory behind the tool is the same as a Cement Bond Log
(CBL). The amplitude that is measured by the tool indicates
whether the pipe is free or not. Typically, a free pipe baseline is
established and compared to shifts in the amplitude
measurement to identify areas where the pipe is likely stuck.
Considerations for well control situations over a conventional
free-point tool:
Log does not require the movement of the pipe to
determine a stuck point.
o Pipe movement through the BOP in a well control
event should be avoided if possible.
Sonic log can determine multiple stuck points as opposed
to only the shallowest point behind the pipe with free-
point tools.
The presence of gas behind a pipe string may be detected
due to “cycle skip" in the log.
Where
davg = average brine density, ppg
dsurf = surface density, ppg
Tsurf = surface temperature, oF
BHT = bottom hole temperature, oF
TVD = true vertical depth, ft
Temperature and Pressure Correction Factors
Density Temperature Pressure Factor,
Brine
ppg Factor, cT* cp**
NaCl 9.49 ppg 0.24 ppg/100o F 0.019 ppg/1000 psi
o
CaCl2 11.46 ppg 0.27 ppg/100 F 0.017 ppg/1000 psi
NaBr 12.48 ppg 0.33 ppg/100o F 0.021 ppg/1000 psi
CaBr2 14.30 ppg 0.33 ppg/100o F 0.022 ppg/1000 psi
ZnBr2/CaBr2/CaCl2 16.01 ppg 0.36 ppg/100o F 0.022 ppg/1000 psi
o
ZnBr2/CaBr2 19.27 ppg 0.48 ppg/100 F 0.031ppg/1000 psi
* cT measured at 12,000 psi with T = 76o-198o F
** cp measures at 198o F with p = 1000-10,000 psi
A comparison of the measured surface density vs. the effective
wellbore density for a well 12,000' TVD with a BHT of 250 o F is
shown in the following graph.
Density Comparison
12000' TVD
250o F BHT
18.00
16.00
14.00
12.00
10.00
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
ppg
Brine Density
Where
dsurf = surface density, ppg
davg = average density, ppg
Tavg = average wellbore temperature, oF
Tsurf = surface temperature, oF
The effective density values calculated with this formula are
very close to the values calculated using the API 13J equation.
This illustrates the pressure correction due to the brine
compressibility is small and can often be discounted.
Best Practices for Brine Use
There are several items of note when using brines in the field.
Heavy brines are corrosive and can be dangerous to
personnel if mishandled. All brines should be used with
caution and the brine MSDS should be available and
consulted before working with the fluid.
The required PPE for handling and working with brines
should be available for all personnel at all times.
Brines will dehydrate material in which they come in
contact. Rubber gloves and boots are recommended.
Open pits should be covered to keep rainfall from cutting
the brine density in the pits.
All elastomers should be compatible for the brine in use.
Brines should be stored in clean tanks. The brine tanks
should not share a common manifold with fresh water
storage tanks if possible.
Heavy brines stored in tall, square-sided frac tanks may
cause the frac tank to bulge or rupture. Store heavy brines
in round tanks if possible.
Horizontal Considerations
Horizontal wells are a significant portion of the wells drilled on
land. These wells often have lateral sections that are 40% (or
greater) of the total depth.
Drillpipe Schedule
Scheduling kill mud weight (KMW) to the bit for the Engineer's
Method or second circulation of the Driller's Method must
account for killing wells with horizontal sections. The
conventional pressure reduction schedule is assumed to be a
straight line from the surface to the bit. The value calculated for
the Final Circulating Pressure (FCP) is still valid but following a
conventional straight line schedule from the surface to the bit
will not result in a constant bottom-hole pressure.
The graph shows how the actual drillpipe pressure should be
handled versus the conventional schedule that is used in
vertical and directional wells.
Horizontal Pressure Schedule
Normal Pressure Schedule
Conventional vs Horizontal
Kill Pressure Schedule
After Weighting Up
Volume
DP Pressure
Snubbing
Snubbing is the process of running tubulars in/out of a well
when a pipe light condition exists (Reference pipe light
calculation in this book for further explanation). Snubbing
units add the external force required to move the tubular in a
controlled manner and overcome the pressure-area force and
frictional force generated on a tubular.
Most snubbing unit sizes are referred to in respect to the
maximum hook load for the unit. This being the maximum
working weight that the unit can lift with the hydraulic circuit at
the maximum pressure. The maximum snub load is generally
half of the hook load, depending on the actual size of the
snubbing jack leg cylinders and pistons.
Example: Hydra Rig 340K Unit
Max hook load = 340,000 lbf, Max Sub Load = ±170,000 lbf
Snub Force Equation
𝐹𝑆 = 𝐹𝑃−𝐴 + 𝐹𝑓 + 𝐹𝐵 − 𝑊𝑠 − 𝑊𝑓
Where
Fs = Snub Force, lbf
FP-A = Pressure-Area Force acting on the pipe, lbf
Ff = Frictional force, lbf
FB = Buoyant force from wellbore fluids, lbf
Ws = String Weight, lbm
Wf = Weight of fluid in the pipe, lbm
Assumptions:
No drag in the wellbore other than frictional force at the
sealing element.
Equation assumes pipe is run into the well.
𝑊𝑠 = 𝐿 × 𝑤𝑖
Where
Area = Pipe area at the sealing element, in2
OD = Outer Diameter of tubular, in
L = Length of the work string, ft
wi = Incremental weight of the tubular, lbm/ft
Ws = Total String Weight, lbm
ForceP-A = Pressure-Aarea force, lbf
Concepts to remember:
Fluid in the tubular will impact the summation of forces
in the system.
Frictional pressure opposes motion and needs to be
considered in snubbing force calculations, not necessarily
pipe light calculations.
The area component is typically the most misinterpreted
component in the relationship. The area is NOT
calculated based on the largest component or tool on the
tubular string, it is calculated where the pressure
differential occurs.
Hot Tapping
Hot tapping is defined as a method used to obtain access to a
pressurized tubular or vessel. This is generally completed using
a bit to drill into a tubular under pressure in a controlled
manner.
The main components of a hot tapping system are:
Saddle – assembly that seals on the vessel to be tapped.
Seal – UHMW seal or other variation.
Hot tap unit – drilling assembly
o Hand, air or hydraulic operated
o Size and pressure rating varies
Pressurizing device
o Hand pump or small air/hydraulic pump
General Procedure for hot tapping operations:
Install the saddle on the pressurized vessel.
Install a working valve on the saddle.
Install the hot tap unit on the working valve and pressure
test the unit seals, saddle seal and the working valve.
Leave suitable pressure on the unit for making the tap to
indicate that pressure communication has been
established.
Stroke in the hot tap bit and drill a hole in the pressurized
vessel.
Retract the hot tap bit and close the working valve.
Bleed off the pressure on the hot tap unit and proceed
with the intervention.
When completing a hot tap, it is desired to drill the hole making
fine shavings/cuttings. This is typically done by keeping
minimal force applied to the bit when drilling. This should limit
the chances of getting the bit stuck and plugging up the
hole/equipment with the larger cuttings. For this reason, many
hot tap units feed the bit "by hand" to assist with the application
of minimal pressure to the bit.
Some vendors and personnel prefer to drill a small pilot hole,
and complete a subsequent reaming run to open the hole to the
desired size. Others prefer to drill the hole to the desired size in
a single run. Both techniques have been completed successfully
on numerous occasions.
The materials to be drilled will generally dictate the type of bit
or mill to be used. Generally, a twist bit is used for drilling into
tubulars. A specialize mill may be necessary for other specific
applications.
Hot tap tools come in many configurations. Generally, it is
desired to keep the tool length as short as possible to limit the
support loads for the tool. This also assists with getting to tool
into tight areas when well spacing may be an issue. The tool
should be supported during operations to ensure failure does
not occur due to excessive loading on the unit or saddle.
Key points to remember:
Always allow enough stroke with the polished rod to
retract the bit behind all valves on the unit. Some units
allow for adjustment under pressure, and some do not.
Always test the unit properly before operation. The saddle
seal is critical to maintain pressure integrity.
Dynamic Kill
A dynamic kill is one in which the backpressure on the well to
be killed cannot be manipulated. These type kills are mostly
performed on blowouts.
"Out running the kick" is a common phrase that technically
refers to a dynamic kill. However, the dynamic kill process is
much more complicated than simply pumping as fast as
possible.
The basic principles of a dynamic kill involve a complicated
mixing problem.
The basic equation for well control also applies to a dynamic
kill.
𝐵𝐻𝑃 = 𝐻𝑃 + 𝑆𝑃 + 𝐹𝑃 + 𝐴𝑃
Where
BHP = Bottom-hole pressure, psi
HP = Hydrostatic Pressure, psi
SP = Surface Pressure, psi
FP = Friction Pressure, psi
AP = Acceleration Pressure, psi
A close look at the terms in this equation provides the following
definitions as related to a dynamic kill.
The hydrostatic pressure is dependent on the density of
the kill fluid/blowout fluid mixture.
The surface pressure is due to any surface restrictions at
the blowout exit point.
The friction pressure is dependent on the friction from
the kill fluid/blowout fluid mixture.
The acceleration pressure is the kinetic energy term. This
pressure is due to the change in velocity of the fluid.
The hydrostatic pressure is the main component of the kill.
Determining the mixture density of the kill fluid/blowout fluid
is straightforward. If the blowout fluid is gas, the gas density
can be calculated at different pressures and temperatures.
The surface pressure component for most dynamic kills is fixed.
In conventional well kills like the Driller's or Engineers
Methods, the surface pressure is varied by opening or closing
the choke. The ability to manipulate the surface pressure
removes the requirement to control the well with a dynamic kill.
In most blowouts, the surface pressure is atmospheric pressure.
Calculations for the exit pressure of a blowout are relatively
easy to make if the flow from the well is sonic.
Acceleration pressure is due to gas expansion as the gas moves
up the well to the surface. The velocity change results in a force
applied over the exit diameter area. This force is usually low
and is often discounted in dynamic kill calculations.
There are four components needed for the dynamic kill
calculation.
The blowout flow rate
The blowout fluid density
The kill fluid rate
The kill fluid density
The blowout flow rate can be calculated. For a gas well, the
reservoir Inflow Performance Relationship (IPR) curve
establishes a flow rate vs. BHP graphically. The Productivity
Index (PI) can also be used. The PI is a straight line ratio of the
well production vs. the reservoir pressure drop (bopd/psi or
mmscfd/psi). The Forchheimer equation is most often used to
generate the IPR curve for dry gas wells. The curve can be
corrected for oil flow with the gas.
The outflow curve (often called the tubing curve) can also be
calculated. There are several methods used for the outflow
curve; average T&z, and Cullender and Smith are the methods
that are the most presented in industry literature. The
calculations involve integration of the well flowing pressure.
When the IPR and outflow curves are plotted together, their
intersection gives the blowout flow rate and corresponding
flowing BHP. Estimating the blowout flow rate is beneficial for
the response effort and it can be used for the intervention effort
in numerous ways.
Sizing diverter systems (if needed)
Capping force calculations
Post capping snubbing and/or coiled tubing operations
Relief well planning
The gas blowout fluid density can be calculated based on gas
composition, pressure, temperature and z-factor. Various
methods use surface or average gas density for steady state
calculations. If the well is also producing fluid, the density of
the produced fluid needs to be considered.
The blowout fluid density is usually a big unknown when
calculating the dynamic kill rate. Assumptions for the gas
density that are incorrect can lead to large errors in the kill
calculations.
The kill fluid density and rate are chosen. The kill fluid/blowout
fluid mix results in a mixture density. This mixture density is
used to calculate the hydrostatic and friction pressures.
Using the gas density at surface conditions will result in a lower
mixture density than the actual mixture density. This method is
often used to produce the most conservative calculation for the
dynamic kill.
When the various flow rates and kill rates are plotted together,
all kill solutions that yield a BHP greater that the IPR (or PI)
curve are considered valid.
An example dynamic kill with 13.0 ppg mud for a 10,000' TVD
dry gas well with 9000 psi reservoir pressure blowing out
through 95/8" casing is shown in the flowing graph.
7000
Cullender & Smith Outflow
Forchheimer IPR
6000
30 bpm Kill
40 bpm Kill
50 bpm Kill
5000
Steady State Dynamic Kill
psi
3000
Blowout Flow Rate = ±94 mmscfd
Blowout Flow Path = 8.5" ID
2000
Depth = 1000' TVD
KWM = 13.0 ppg
1000
0
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
mmscfd
Gas Flow Rate
Momentum Kill
Flowing fluids create a momentum force. This applies to
formation fluids during a blowout. If the momentum force from
the blowout fluids can be counteracted with a greater
momentum force, the blowout flow will stop. Pumping mud
into the blowout can sometimes be the counteracting
momentum force. Therefore a momentum kill is basically a
fluid collision where the kill fluid momentum is greater than the
gas momentum.
In the past, well control experts also called this "out running the
blowout". The blowout control consisted of tying a pump line
onto the well and "pumping heavy mud as fast as possible". An
engineering approach presented by SPE to this method can be
reduced to the following equation:
1.64 × 𝑠𝑔𝑔𝑎𝑠 × 𝑞2 × 𝑧 × 𝑇
𝐹𝑚𝑣 =
𝑝 × 𝑑2
Where
Fmv = Momentum force of gas, lbf
sggas = specific gravity for gas
q - gas flow rate, mmscfd
zd = gas compressibility factor at depth
Td = Temperature at depth, ᵒR
pd = Pressure at depth, psi
d = diameter, in.
The difficulty in making this calculation lies in determining the
specific gravity, pressure, z factor, flow rate and temperature of
the gas. If good values for these unknowns can be made the
momentum force of the gas can be calculated.
The momentum force of the kill fluid can be calculated using
following equation:
0.374 × 𝑀𝑊 × 𝑄 2
𝐹=
𝑑2
Where
Fmv = Momentum force, lbf
MW = Mud weight, ppg
Q - Pump rate, bpm
d = Hole ID, in
There are numerous assumptions made in this equation:
Surface gas density = 0.0458 lb/ft3
Molecular weight of air = 28.97
Acceleration due to gravity - 32.2 lbmft/lbfsec2
Solving for a kill fluid momentum force that is greater than the
gas momentum force yields the pump rate and mud weight
required to overcome the blowout flow.
Rules of Thumb:
Momentum kills where the fluids meet at the surface are
rarely successful.
Momentum kills aren't well suited to blowouts that make
lots of fluid.
The deeper in the well where the fluids meet, the more
likely the success of this method.
Guessing at the values for pressure at depth and the gas
flow rate is not a good practice when calculating the
momentum force of the gas.
Underground Blowout
The generally accepted definition of an underground blowout
(UGBO) is the uncontrolled flow of formation fluids from one
underground formation into another.
An UGBO can generally be identified by one or more of the
following indicators:
Fluctuations in surface pressure(s).
Presence of gas to the surface.
Discontinuity between casing and drillpipe pressure
responses (i.e. the u-tube is no longer a closed system).
Increasing casing pressure due to the displacement of
drilling/completion fluids with reservoir fluids.
Falling drillpipe fluid level (if the drill string is in the
hole).
Irregular response to. conventional well control methods
Most UGBO cases flow from deeper to shallower formations.
There are cases where the flow has been from shallow zones
into deeper zones, based on pressures associated with the
wellbore.
Situations that commonly result in an UGBO are as follows:
Fracture pressure at the casing shoe (or weakest exposed
formation) is exceeded upon shut-in from a kick.
Improper execution of well control techniques that leads
to failure of the wellbore.
Gas migration is allowed to occur without intervention
that leads to increased pressure within the wellbore and
eventually failure.
Induced failure of the wellbore from pumping
(bullheading, top kill, etc.).
Casing failure allowing the exposure of weaker formations
to excessive pressure.
Poor isolation (cement) behind casing allowing the
exposure of weaker zones to excessive pressure.
Common methods used to kill an UGBO are as follows:
Dynamic kills
Reactive pills (gunk, etc.)
"Sandwich" kills
Momentum kills
As with any kill operation, several parameters must be either
defined or assumed. These are as follows:
Flow rate of reservoir fluids
Reservoir fluid properties
Flow path within the wellbore
A reasonable assumption can typically be reached for the
reservoir fluid properties. The flow path and flow rate are the
parameters that tend to be misinterpreted in an unsuccessful
kill attempt. The flow path can often be well diagnosed by the
use of temperature logs. The flow rate can also be estimated by
the use of temperature logs, or other diagnostic logging
techniques. These techniques are normally sensitive to
interpretation and various assumptions.
Logs for Well Control
In well control operations, temperature logs are generally used
in association with underground blowout (UGBO) diagnostics.
Temperature and noise logs can be very useful in the
identification of a wellbore fluid flow path, either in the
wellbore system or behind a casing string.
Noise Logs
Noise logs are often run in conjunction with a temperature log
and can be used to support the diagnostic conclusions from the
temperature data. A sensitive microphone is run the amplitude
of different frequencies is recorded. The noise log is run by
stopping the tool at different stations in the well. The stations
should be determined by the anomalies found in the
temperature log.
The amplitude changes in the log can indicate fluid entry, flow
restriction or fluid exiting the wellbore. Noise log experts can
determine the different phases of the fluid from the logs.
Temperature Logs
The theory of temperature logs for well control operations is the
same as it is for production operations. The flowing fluids in the
wellbore change the surrounding temperature profile, based on
a number of parameters. If the geothermal (static) temperature
profile for the well is known, the flowing profile can be
compared to identify areas of fluid movement based on
temperature change.
The temperature log profile can be impacted by the following:
Geothermal temperature for the area
Flow rate
Type of flowing fluid(s)
Well geometry
Duration of flow
Entry and exit point for flowing fluid(s)
Wellbore deviation (TVD vs MD)
The following are some general "Rule of Thumb" considerations
for temperature logging in well control operations:
The geothermal profile for the area needs to be
understood for the baseline for comparison of the
temperature logs.
The initial down log run is typically the most accurate for
temperature comparison, as the data it provides most
closely resembles the wellbore state prior to the log being
run.
Heat exchange into the surrounding well from moving
fluids is time dependent in the "early-time region".
Sufficient time should be allowed for temperature
changes to occur before/after logging.
o It is difficult to allocate a specific time value for the
"early-time region" as heat exchange is flowrate
dependent. However, it can be defined as the region on
the temperature profile that occurs prior to the system
reaching a state of thermal equilibrium.
Pulsed Neutron Logs
Pulsed neutron logs can also be used for UGBO determination.
This tool emits a neutron into the flow. The neutrons are then
sensed as the flow moves them by the detector in the tool. The
tool can be used to detect flow up or down. Calculations of the
flow rate can be made. This tool is especially useful for water
flows.
Notes
Notes
Notes
Notes
Blowout Engineers Office Location
The Woodlands, TX
8505 Technology Forrest, Suite 101
The Woodlands, TX 77381
1.888.505.6346
www.blowoutengineers.com
Houston, TX
777 Post Oak Blvd, Suite 400
Houston, TX 77056
1.713.956.0956
Midland, TX
10 Desta Drive, Suite 260 E
Midland, TX 79705
1.432.683.8000
Lafayette, LA
500 Dover Blvd., Suite 310
Lafayette, LA 70503
1.337.984.2603
Oklahoma City, OK
3101 South Lakeside Drive
Oklahoma City, OK 73179
1.405.843.5566
Denver, CO
1580 Lincoln Street, Suite 630
Denver, CO 80203
1.303.542.1853
Morgantown, WV
2603 Cranberry Square
Morgantown, WV 26508
1.304.413.4500
Dallas, TX
1333 West McDermott, Suite 150
Allen, TX 75013
1.469.519.2711
www.sierra-hamilton.com
1.888.505.6346
These contacts act as First Responders to a well control event
and can be reached 24 hrs/day for any well control emergency.
Houston, TX.
Dan Eby
[email protected]
832.702.6945
Jace Larrison
[email protected]
713.715.8218
Brendyn Emerson
[email protected]
386.283.3291
Ricky Erwin
[email protected]
713.252.5060
Blake Patton
[email protected]
713.956.0956
Rick Daab
[email protected]
713.956.0956
Lafayette. LA.
Al Bellaire
[email protected]
337.984.2603
Midland, TX.
Russ Ginanni
[email protected]
432.425.7450
Denver, CO.
Steve Biggs
[email protected]
303.709.4035
Morgantown, W.V.
Mike Reel
[email protected]
304.629.8053