Essay 1 Critically Analyse
Essay 1 Critically Analyse
Critically analyse how intersections of race, ethnicity and class might impact upon a student’s
educational aspirations and life chances. Reflect on how your own intercultural understandings
might influence your teaching practice.
Schools are filled with students and teachers with different social and cultural backgrounds. This
multicultural society. These diverse institutes are filled with students that have diverse needs,
different backgrounds and different social statuses. In this essay I will argue that teachers bring
to classrooms their own habitus, including societies definitions of ‘race’, ‘Ethnicity’ and ‘class’
which can have an impact on the approaches to teaching and learning available to the students,
these constructs may also result in an inequity between the students. However, I will also discuss
how teachers can create a positive learning environment through their use of reflexivity and
praxis. Using Critical race theory, Functionalism and Marxism, I will focus on how intersections
between race, ethnicity and class may impact a student’s educational aspirations and life
chances. I will also apply my own intercultural understandings and experiences regarding these
intersections to explore how they may have an impact on or how I will be able to apply them to
In order to understand how race, ethnicity and class affect education we must first
understand the construct of each of these and what they really mean within society. Race is a
social construct that segregates people based of “meanings that people attach to colour or
physical characteristics as they go about their everyday lives” (Richard Race,2014 page 2)
mostly in a biological nature. The definition of race differs from that of ethnicity, ethnicity is
social groupings of people based upon differences, or commonalities, this includes shared
background, language, type of clothing and religious beliefs (Richard Race, 2014). Class on the
other-hand defines people based of their social and financial achievements, this can include
such all tie in together to create different forms of prejudice such as racism and classism, in turn
feature of ‘otherness’, referring to the different social concepts that we use to define people such
as class, gender, race and ethnicity. Richard Race (2014) presents us with the idea of
intersectionality being needed in creating a wider picture on how to define and analyse the ways
in which race and ethnicity are researched and presented. By understanding the bigger picture of
the intersections of race, ethnicity and class we can start to understand how these social concepts
can have a negative impact within the classroom as they create a ‘system of oppressed’.
Within education the system of the oppressed created through the intersections between
race, ethnicity and class can create a classroom without equity. An aim within education is to
provide equity for all, though this may not always occur. In order to understand what we mean
by equity we should first explore the differences between equality and equity. Equality is the
provision of the same resources to everyone, where equity is the provision of resources
depending on needs, which results the being at an equal level. An example of this is seen with
school funding, schools in lower socio-economic areas require more funding than those in higher
socio-economic areas, if we took an equality approach both these schools would receive the
same amount of funding resulting in the same difference between them, though an equity
approach would provide more funding to the schools in the lower socio-economic area to bring
them to the same level as the other (John Smyth, 2014). This is only one example of how equity
works within education but it is present in many different areas of education, including but not
limited to, opportunities given to students and extra support offered. The process of providing
equity within the classroom can be influenced but outside factors such as government policies,
dominant discourse (Margaret Zamudio, 2011). Many difference theories have been applied to
the study of intercultural education with some of these addressing the issue of equity and others
explores the concept of class creating a distinct line between the Bourgeoisie (upper class) and
the Proletariat (middle class). This distinction emphasizes the dominant discourse of those in
power to create a ‘false class consciousness’, which is used by the dominant group to “justif[y]
its power with stores that ‘construct reality in ways to maintain their privilege’” (Mike Cole,
2012 page 169). Within education this implies that based on a child’s background they can only
achieve so much, so that is all we will have them aim for. This intersects with race and ethnicity
because the class struggle has an emphasizes on certain criteria, which is determined by the
dominant ‘white’ power and used to create an institutional and structured racism (Mike Cole,
2012). The Marxism approach focuses on the economic capital and places value on education, as
the world has progressed this economic capital is beginning to change to an emphasis on
knowledge capital. This is due to machinery taking over the jobs of the proletariat, so in order to
maintain the distinction between the dominant power there has been an emphasis on controlling
knowledge capital. This distribution of knowledge based of class background can create an
inequitable environment for students to learn, causing some students to be limited in the
acquisition of knowledge capital (Michael Peters, 2003). Though this approach is not seen as
much in school’s today, it can still become an issue within the classroom and must be
acknowledged alongside other theories. Marxism is important for me to recognize and accept as
Functionalism can cause inequity and unequal opportunities for students based on their
race, class and ethnicity. Functionalism is a basis in which acknowledges that all people have
skills which should be developed in order to contribute to society but that not everyone has the
teachers having control over what resources students ought to have to be a contributing member
of society, they control what resources the students actually have and get to determine their
needs by a comparison of what they ought to have and what they actually do have (Edward
Potthoff, 1943). It is not only the teachers who influence what she students need to learn but also
the institutions and policies such as the Board of Studies, schools, pedagogy and the curriculum
(Edward Potthoff, 1943). The teachers being able to actively decide which skills the student
should learn can be very problematic, this is due to the fact that all students can learn anything.
For the dominant power, be it institution or teachers, to decide on criteria in which defines a
student as being only capable of learning one skill or another, is oppressive and creates inequity
among the students. There is a greater focus on differences being a deficit, be in differences in
race, ethnicity, class gender or others. The oppression of the ‘other’ in order for the mainstream
success creates unequal opportunities and inequity among students is the biggest concern of
functionalism.
To better understand the position of the student within these frameworks and the
constraints around the influence teachers have over the students the Critical race theory (CRT)
plays a key role. CRT emphasizes understanding of one’s own whiteness as a key feature in
understanding the dominant position. In other words, CRT is a tool that can be used to challenge
(Richard Race, 2014). To fight against the ‘white’ dominant discourse we first need to
understand how we stand within it, by understanding our own position we are able to have a
within CRT on race, history (e.g. process of racialization), voice matters (opposition to the
dominant discourse) and Praxis (putting the theory into practice) (Margaret Zamudio, 2011). We
can see that CRT does not only point towards race as the answer, or the issue, but that there is a
focus on understanding and engaging with ideological mechanisms of white supremacy (Maria
Ledesma, 2015). The framework of CRT offers better opportunities for students and their future
as it helps to create a positive and accepting environment. This is only able to be achieved
though through self-reflection in order to understand your own position within the dominant
structures of white supremacy. If reflexivity is used to reflect on practices and your own habitus,
you would be able to acknowledge your own white supremacy (Tania Ferfolja, 2015) and then
In order to improve my own future teaching I must take an approach filled with Praxis
and reflexivity, only through this approach will I be able to understand the dominant discourses
that I am involved with and provide a safe learning environment for my classroom. Praxis is
applying theory to practice, by understanding the theories that are revolving within the education
and Critical race theory I can apply the positive aspects and better understand how I interact with
my students. Through applying theoretical frameworks to my teaching and avoiding the potential
inequity that comes along with some ways of approaching race, ethnicity and class, I can
ethnicity, social background and histories present themselves constantly either consciously or
unconsciously and must be taken into account when applying reflexivity (Jenna Shim, 2014).
Within my own practice I will need to consider shared experiences and how my own social and
cultural context challenge the power relations between socially constructed ideologies around
race, ethnicity and class (Jenna Shim, 2014). I experience a teacher applying reflexivity within
his classroom in my shadow day, he discussed with me after class how he always reflects on the
class and how power relations work within the classroom, he focused on giving opportunities to
all the students and on ways to engage without forcing ideologies onto the students. I found that
the approach using praxis and reflexivity will be the best way to provide the best experience and
In conclusion we can see that in order to provide a beneficial environment for students to
have equitable opportunities and life choices we must explore and apply Praxis and reflexivity in
intercultural education. By exploring and understanding the difference ways race, ethnicity, and
class are defined and affected by the dominant discourse of a society we are able to see the
effects of different theories such as Marxism, functionalism and Critical Race Theory. In the
future I will need to critically approach my own teaching incorporating reflexivity and praxis
into my practice, acknowledging my own whiteness and ideologies I may be placing onto my
students and approach that in a way which is inclusive and provides an equitable opportunity for