Fall 2014 / T 4:00 - 6:00pm / Ballantine 137

Political Science 669: Network Analysis

and World Politics

William Kindred Winecoff

Indiana University at Bloomington

Office: Woodburn 403; M & W 2:30 - 4:00 p.m. oba
[email protected]

course description
This course introduces students to concepts of network theory as they
apply to the world political system and to theoretical and empirical net-
work analyses of that system. We will explore how network theory can
offer novel insights into enduring problems in world politics, including
terrorism, economic development, conflict (intra- and international), and
investment. We will examine agency within structures that are rendered
as networks, seeking to understand the interdependent contexts in which
social action occurs. At each step we will link network characteristics
– e.g., prominence – to prior concepts in political science – e.g., hege-
mony. No prior knowledge of network theory or methodology is required,
although students should be prepared for technical discussion at times.

requirements
This is a seminar course. Attendance at each meeting is mandatory and
absences will not be excused barring truly unfortunate circumstances. I
expect you to come to each meeting having read the assigned material
carefully, and to participate in discussions. The other requirements in-
volve writing:

1
 2

1. Four short writing assignments (2 - 4 pages) reacting to material

assigned for that week, to be circulated to the class at least 24 hours
before meeting. There is a sign-up sheet posted at http://tinyurl.
com/owg2wkj. These are writing and thinking exercises intended to
spur discussion of the readings; they are not scholarly treatises and
they do not need to cover every bit of every reading. They should be
thoughtful, however. Everyone is required to read the responses for
that week before class.

2. An article-length paper (~8k - 10k words) on a topic of your choos-

ing. Ideally this will be a practice run at your two-year paper or a
dissertation chapter, depending upon where you are in the program.
A successful paper will:

· Survey the relevant literature succinctly.

· Formulate an appropriate research design: theory, hypotheses,
methodology.
· Perform the analysis.

The goal is to have an article which is close to submittable to a con-

ference and/or journal by the end of the semester. I understand that
for some of you this will be the first (or one of the first) substantive
articles you have written, so I do not expect these to be publish-
able in the APSR by December. However, successful completion of
this assignment should further your research agenda in a tangible
way. Therefore, I insist that this paper be on a topic related to your
dissertation even if that takes you somewhat far afield from the ma-
terial we read in this class. I also insist that it contain a “scientific”
component, which in almost all cases should be empirical.
We will discuss this further over the course of the semester but the
first step will be getting my approval for your paper. This will require
the submission of an abstract that describes the research question,
the theoretical approach, the hypotheses, and the method used to
evaluate them. If the method is quantitative then I would also like a
list of data sources you intend to use and the modeling approaches
you intend to use. I can help you find appropriate data if you are not
sure where to look. If the method is not quantitative then you will
 3

need to explain what other empirical, textual, or critical methodol-

ogy you wish to employ. Replication papers are allowed, and even
encouraged, so long as there is a theoretical or methodological ex-
tension that would provide an original contribution.
At the end of the semester these papers will be presented to the
class in standard conference format: 12-15 minutes of presentation
followed by my comments (as discussant) and a question and answer
session.
I understand that this will be painful, but believe me: you need the
practice.

readings
The articles will all be posted on the course website. If you can’t find
something let me know right away. If you do not have much background
in network analysis and would like a background textbook or two for ref-
erence, please let me know and I will recommend some to you.

i: introduction to networks in world politics (aug. 25)

Emilie Hafner-Burton, Miles Kahler, and Alexander H. Montgomery. Network
analysis for international relations. International Organization, 63:559–
592, 2009.
Zeev Maoz. How network analysis can inform the study of international relations.
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(3):247–256, 2012.
Cassy Dorff and Michael D. Ward. Networks, dyads, and the social relations
model. Political Science Research and Methods, 1(2):159–178, 2013.

ii: network theory and world politics, i (sept. 8)

Jeffrey Hart. Structures of influence and cooperation-conflict. International In-
teractions, 1:141–162, 1974.
Barry Wellman. Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociological Theory,
1:155–200, 1983.
Stephen P. Borgatti and Daniel S. Halgin. On network theory. Organization Sci-
ence, 22(5):1168–1181, 2011.
 4

Jason Beckfield. The social structure of the world polity. American Journal of
Sociology, 115(4):1018–1068, 2010.

iii: network theory and world politics, ii (sept. 15)

Required
Barry Wellman. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and
substance. In Barry Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz, editors, Social structures:
A network approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1988.
M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review,
45(2):167–256, 2003.
Jeff Haynes. Transnational religious actors and international politics. Third World
Quarterly, 22(2):142–158, 2001.
Daniel H. Nexon. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe. Princeton
University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009.
Note: read chapters 1 and 2 only.

iv: brokerage power in global networks (sept. 22)

Required
Stacie E. Goddard. Brokering change: networks and entrepreneurs in interna-
tional politics. International Theory, 1(2):249–281, 2009.
R. Charli Carpenter. Vetting the advocacy agenda: Network centrality and the
paradox of weapons norms. International Organization, 65(1):69–102, 2011.
Charli Carpenter, Sirin Duygulu, Alexander Montgomery, and Anna Rapp. Ex-
plaining the advocacy agenda: Insights from the human security agenda.
International Organization, forthcoming, 2015.
Frédéric Mérand, Stéphanie C. Hofmann, and Bastien Irondelle. Governance and
state power: A network analysis of european security. Journal of Common
Market Studies, 49(1):121–147, 2011.

v: networks and international conflict, i (sept. 29)

Emilie Hafner-Burton and Alexander Montgomery. Power positions: International
organizations, social networks, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution,
50(1):3–27, 2006.
 5

Skyler J. Cranmer, Bruce A. Desmarais, and Justin H. Kirkland. Toward a net-

work theory of alliance formation. International Interactions, 38(3):295–
324, 2012.
Yonatan Lupu and Vincent A. Traag. Trading communities, the networked struc-
ture of international relations, and the kantian peace. Journal of Conflict
Resolution, 57(6):1011–1042, 2013.
Skyler J. Cranmer, Elizabeth J. Menninga, and Peter J. Mucha. Kantian fraction-
alization predicts the conflict propensity of the international system. Sci-
ence, revise and resubmit, 2015.

vi: networks and international conflict, ii (oct. 6)

Emilie M. Hafner-Burton and Alexander H. Montgomery. War, trade, and distrust:
Why trade agreements don’t always keep the peace. Conflict Management
and Peace Science, 29(3):257–278, 2012.
Zeev Maoz. Preferential attachment, homophily, and the structure of interna-
tional networks, 1816-2003. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(3):341–
369, 2012.
Skyler J. Cranmer, Bruce A. Desmarais, and Elizabeth J. Menninga. Complex
Dependencies in the Alliance Network. Conflict Management and Peace
Science, 29(3):279–313, 2012.
Emilie M. Hafner-Burton and Alexander H. Montgomery. Centrality in transna-
tional governance: How networks of international institutions shape power
processes. Presented at the New Power Politics: Networks, Governance,
and Global Security workshop, Denver, CO, March 1, 2013, 2014.

vii: networks and international conflict, iii (oct. 13)

Anne-Marie Slaughter. A grand strategy of network centrality. In Richard Foun-
taine and Kristin M. Lord, editors, America’s Path: Grand Strategy for the
Next Administration, pages 43–56. Center for a New American Security,
2012.
Alexander Cooley and Daniel H. Nexon. ‘the empire will compensate you’: The
structural dynamics of the u.s. overseas basing network. Perspectives on
Politics, 11(4):1034–1050, 2013.
Christian Bueger and Felix Bethke. Actor-networking the ‘failed state’ – and en-
quiry into the life of concepts. Journal of International Relations and De-
velopment, 17(30-60), 2014.
 6

Jason M. Smith, Daniel S. Halgin, Virginie Kidwell-Lopez, Giuseppe Labianca,

Daniel J. Brass, and Stephen P. Borgatti. Power in politically charges net-
works. Social Networks, 36(0):162–176, 2014.

viii: civil conflict and terrorism networks (oct. 20)

Valdis E. Krebs. Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections, 24(3):43–52,
2002.
Shin-Kap Han. The other ride of paul revere: The brokerage role in the mak-
ing of the american revolution. Mobilization: An International Quarterly,
14(2):143–162, 2009.
See also this post by Kieran Healy.
Bruce A. Desmarais and Skyler J. Cranmer. Forecasting the locational dynamics
of transnational terrorism: A network analytic approach. Security Infor-
matics, 2(8):1–13, 2013.
Nils W. Metternich, Cassy Dorff, Max Gallop, Simon Weschle, and Michael D.
Ward. Antigovernmental networks in civil conflicts: How network struc-
tures affect conflictual behavior. American Journal of Political Science,
57(4):892–911, 2013.

ix: networks in the world economy, i (oct. 27)

Mark S. Mizruchi. Political economy and network analysis: An untapped conver-
gence. Sociologica, 2, 2007.
Thomas Oatley, W. Kindred Winecoff, Sarah Bauerle Danzman, and Andrew Pen-
nock. The political economy of global finance: A network model. Perspec-
tives on Politics, 11(1):133–153, 2013.
Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder, and Stefano Battiston. The network of global
corporate control. PLoS ONE, 6(10), 2011.
W. Kindred Winecoff. Financial power and the global crisis: A network analytical
approach. Business and Politics, 17(3):495–526, 2015.

x: networks in the world economy, ii (nov. 3)

Emilie M. Hafner-Burton and Alexander H. Montgomery. Globalization and the
social power politics of international economic networks. In Miles Kahler,
editor, Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance. Cornell Uni-
versity Press, Ithaca, NY, 2009.
 7

Nina Bandelj and Matthew C. Mahutga. Structures of globalization: Evidence

from the worldwide network of bilateral investment treaties (1959-2009).
International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 54(2):95–123, 2012.
Mark S. Manger, Mark A. Pickup, and Tom A. B. Snijders. A hierarchy of prefer-
ences: A longitudinal network analysis approach to pta formation. Journal
of Conflict Resolution, 56(5):853–878, 2012.
Skyler J. Cranmer, Tobias Henrich, and Bruce A. Desmarais. Reciprocity and
the structural determinants of the international sanctions network. Social
Networks, 36(1):5–22, 2013.

xi: diffusion and convergence through international net-

works (nov. 10)
Xun Cao. Networks of intergovernmental organizations and convergence in do-
mestic economic policies. International Studies Quarterly, 53:1095–1130,
2009.
Xun Cao. Networks as channels of policy diffusion: Explaining worldwide changes
in capital taxation, 1998-2006. International Studies Quarterly, 54:823–
854, 2010.
Xun Cao. Global networks and domestic policy convergence: A network explana-
tion of policy changes. World Politics, 64(3):375–425, 2012.
Jay Goodliffe and Darren Hawkins. Dependence networks and the diffusion of
domestic political institutions. Journal of Conflict Resolution, forthcoming,
2015.

xii: networks in international law (nov. 17)

Brandon J. Kinne. Network dynamics and the evolution of international coopera-
tion. American Political Science Review, 107(4):766–785, 2013.
Yonatan Lupu and Erik Voeten. Precedent in international courts: A network
analysis of case citations by the european court of human rights. British
Journal of Political Science, 42:413–439, 2011.
Krzysztof J. Pelc. The politics of precedent in international law: A social network
application. American Political Science Review, 108(3):547–564, 2014.
Amanda Murdie. The ties that bind: A network analysis of human rights interna-
tional nongovernmental organizations. British Journal of Political Science,
44(1):1–27, 2014.
 8

xiii: no class - thanksgiving break (nov. 24)

xiv: whither we go? (dec. 1)

NOTE: Papers due.
Kieran Healy. The performativity of networks. European Journal of Sociology,
56(2):175–205, 2015.
Danielle Jung and David A. Lake. Markets, Hierarchies, and Networks: An Agent-
Based Organizational Ecology. American Journal of Political Science, 55(4):971–
989, 2011.
Matthias Staisch. Why multilateralism is rare: A network theory of international
order. Working Paper, 2015.
Kevin Young. Not by structure alone: power, prominence, and agency in american
finance. Business and Politics, 17(3):443–472, 2015.

xv (dec. 8)
Presentations.
 9

Bibliography

[1] Nina Bandelj and Matthew C. Mahutga. Structures of globaliza-

tion: Evidence from the worldwide network of bilateral investment
treaties (1959-2009). International Journal of Comparative Sociol-
ogy, 54(2):95–123, 2012.

[2] Jason Beckfield. The social structure of the world polity. American
Journal of Sociology, 115(4):1018–1068, 2010.

[3] Stephen P. Borgatti and Daniel S. Halgin. On network theory. Orga-

nization Science, 22(5):1168–1181, 2011.

[4] Christian Bueger and Felix Bethke. Actor-networking the ‘failed

state’ – and enquiry into the life of concepts. Journal of Interna-
tional Relations and Development, 17(30-60), 2014.

[5] Xun Cao. Networks of intergovernmental organizations and conver-

gence in domestic economic policies. International Studies Quar-
terly, 53:1095–1130, 2009.

[6] Xun Cao. Networks as channels of policy diffusion: Explaining world-

wide changes in capital taxation, 1998-2006. International Studies
Quarterly, 54:823–854, 2010.

[7] Xun Cao. Global networks and domestic policy convergence: A net-
work explanation of policy changes. World Politics, 64(3):375–425,
2012.

[8] Charli Carpenter, Sirin Duygulu, Alexander Montgomery, and Anna

Rapp. Explaining the advocacy agenda: Insights from the human
security agenda. International Organization, forthcoming, 2015.
 10

[9] R. Charli Carpenter. Vetting the advocacy agenda: Network central-

ity and the paradox of weapons norms. International Organization,
65(1):69–102, 2011.

[10] Alexander Cooley and Daniel H. Nexon. ‘the empire will compensate
you’: The structural dynamics of the u.s. overseas basing network.
Perspectives on Politics, 11(4):1034–1050, 2013.

[11] Skyler J. Cranmer, Bruce A. Desmarais, and Justin H. Kirkland. To-

ward a network theory of alliance formation. International Interac-
tions, 38(3):295–324, 2012.

[12] Skyler J. Cranmer, Bruce A. Desmarais, and Elizabeth J. Menninga.

Complex Dependencies in the Alliance Network. Conflict Manage-
ment and Peace Science, 29(3):279–313, 2012.

[13] Skyler J. Cranmer, Tobias Henrich, and Bruce A. Desmarais. Reci-

procity and the structural determinants of the international sanc-
tions network. Social Networks, 36(1):5–22, 2013.

[14] Skyler J. Cranmer, Elizabeth J. Menninga, and Peter J. Mucha. Kan-

tian fractionalization predicts the conflict propensity of the inter-
national system. Science, revise and resubmit, 2015.

[15] Bruce A. Desmarais and Skyler J. Cranmer. Forecasting the locational

dynamics of transnational terrorism: A network analytic approach.
Security Informatics, 2(8):1–13, 2013.

[16] Cassy Dorff and Michael D. Ward. Networks, dyads, and the social
relations model. Political Science Research and Methods, 1(2):159–
178, 2013.

[17] Stacie E. Goddard. Brokering change: networks and entrepreneurs

in international politics. International Theory, 1(2):249–281, 2009.

[18] Jay Goodliffe and Darren Hawkins. Dependence networks and the
diffusion of domestic political institutions. Journal of Conflict Res-
olution, forthcoming, 2015.

[19] Emilie Hafner-Burton, Miles Kahler, and Alexander H. Montgomery.

Network analysis for international relations. International Organi-
zation, 63:559–592, 2009.
 11

[20] Emilie Hafner-Burton and Alexander Montgomery. Power positions:

International organizations, social networks, and conflict. Journal
of Conflict Resolution, 50(1):3–27, 2006.

[21] Emilie M. Hafner-Burton and Alexander H. Montgomery. Globaliza-

tion and the social power politics of international economic net-
works. In Miles Kahler, editor, Networked Politics: Agency, Power,
and Governance. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2009.

[22] Emilie M. Hafner-Burton and Alexander H. Montgomery. War, trade,

and distrust: Why trade agreements don’t always keep the peace.
Conflict Management and Peace Science, 29(3):257–278, 2012.

[23] Emilie M. Hafner-Burton and Alexander H. Montgomery. Centrality

in transnational governance: How networks of international insti-
tutions shape power processes. Presented at the New Power Pol-
itics: Networks, Governance, and Global Security workshop, Den-
ver, CO, March 1, 2013, 2014.

[24] Shin-Kap Han. The other ride of paul revere: The brokerage role in
the making of the american revolution. Mobilization: An Interna-
tional Quarterly, 14(2):143–162, 2009.

[25] Jeffrey Hart. Structures of influence and cooperation-conflict. Inter-

national Interactions, 1:141–162, 1974.

[26] Jeff Haynes. Transnational religious actors and international politics.

Third World Quarterly, 22(2):142–158, 2001.

[27] Kieran Healy. The performativity of networks. European Journal of

Sociology, 56(2):175–205, 2015.

[28] Danielle Jung and David A. Lake. Markets, Hierarchies, and Net-
works: An Agent-Based Organizational Ecology. American Journal
of Political Science, 55(4):971–989, 2011.

[29] Brandon J. Kinne. Network dynamics and the evolution of interna-

tional cooperation. American Political Science Review, 107(4):766–
785, 2013.

[30] Valdis E. Krebs. Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections,

24(3):43–52, 2002.
 12

[31] Yonatan Lupu and Vincent A. Traag. Trading communities, the net-
worked structure of international relations, and the kantian peace.
Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(6):1011–1042, 2013.

[32] Yonatan Lupu and Erik Voeten. Precedent in international courts: A

network analysis of case citations by the european court of human
rights. British Journal of Political Science, 42:413–439, 2011.

[33] Mark S. Manger, Mark A. Pickup, and Tom A. B. Snijders. A hierarchy

of preferences: A longitudinal network analysis approach to pta
formation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56(5):853–878, 2012.

[34] Zeev Maoz. How network analysis can inform the study of in-
ternational relations. Conflict Management and Peace Science,
29(3):247–256, 2012.

[35] Zeev Maoz. Preferential attachment, homophily, and the structure

of international networks, 1816-2003. Conflict Management and
Peace Science, 29(3):341–369, 2012.

[36] Frédéric Mérand, Stéphanie C. Hofmann, and Bastien Irondelle. Gov-

ernance and state power: A network analysis of european security.
Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(1):121–147, 2011.

[37] Nils W. Metternich, Cassy Dorff, Max Gallop, Simon Weschle, and
Michael D. Ward. Antigovernmental networks in civil conflicts:
How network structures affect conflictual behavior. American Jour-
nal of Political Science, 57(4):892–911, 2013.

[38] Mark S. Mizruchi. Political economy and network analysis: An un-

tapped convergence. Sociologica, 2, 2007.

[39] Amanda Murdie. The ties that bind: A network analysis of human
rights international nongovernmental organizations. British Jour-
nal of Political Science, 44(1):1–27, 2014.

[40] M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks.

SIAM Review, 45(2):167–256, 2003.

[41] Daniel H. Nexon. The Struggle for Power in Early Modern Europe.
Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009.
 13

[42] Thomas Oatley, W. Kindred Winecoff, Sarah Bauerle Danzman, and

Andrew Pennock. The political economy of global finance: A net-
work model. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1):133–153, 2013.

[43] Krzysztof J. Pelc. The politics of precedent in international law: A

social network application. American Political Science Review,
108(3):547–564, 2014.

[44] Anne-Marie Slaughter. A grand strategy of network centrality. In

Richard Fountaine and Kristin M. Lord, editors, America’s Path:
Grand Strategy for the Next Administration, pages 43–56. Center
for a New American Security, 2012.

[45] Jason M. Smith, Daniel S. Halgin, Virginie Kidwell-Lopez, Giuseppe

Labianca, Daniel J. Brass, and Stephen P. Borgatti. Power in politi-
cally charges networks. Social Networks, 36(0):162–176, 2014.

[46] Matthias Staisch. Why multilateralism is rare: A network theory of

international order. Working Paper, 2015.

[47] Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder, and Stefano Battiston. The net-
work of global corporate control. PLoS ONE, 6(10), 2011.

[48] Barry Wellman. Network analysis: Some basic principles. Sociologi-

cal Theory, 1:155–200, 1983.

[49] Barry Wellman. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to

theory and substance. In Barry Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz, edi-
tors, Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge University
Press, New York, NY, 1988.

[50] W. Kindred Winecoff. Financial power and the global crisis: A net-
work analytical approach. Business and Politics, 17(3):495–526,
2015.

[51] Kevin Young. Not by structure alone: power, prominence, and agency
in american finance. Business and Politics, 17(3):443–472, 2015.