1. Nicanor Doldol occupied a portion of public land in 1959, while the provincial board reserved the land as a school site in 1965 through a resolution and presidential proclamation in 1987.
2. When the school demanded Doldol vacate the land for the school's use, he refused. The school filed a legal case, and the lower court ruled in their favor but the appeals court ruled Doldol was entitled to the land since he possessed it for 32 years.
3. The Supreme Court ruled that Doldol did not acquire an imperfect title or right to a land grant since he only occupied the land starting in 1959, which was after the 1945 date required by law to claim public
1. Nicanor Doldol occupied a portion of public land in 1959, while the provincial board reserved the land as a school site in 1965 through a resolution and presidential proclamation in 1987.
2. When the school demanded Doldol vacate the land for the school's use, he refused. The school filed a legal case, and the lower court ruled in their favor but the appeals court ruled Doldol was entitled to the land since he possessed it for 32 years.
3. The Supreme Court ruled that Doldol did not acquire an imperfect title or right to a land grant since he only occupied the land starting in 1959, which was after the 1945 date required by law to claim public
1. Nicanor Doldol occupied a portion of public land in 1959, while the provincial board reserved the land as a school site in 1965 through a resolution and presidential proclamation in 1987.
2. When the school demanded Doldol vacate the land for the school's use, he refused. The school filed a legal case, and the lower court ruled in their favor but the appeals court ruled Doldol was entitled to the land since he possessed it for 32 years.
3. The Supreme Court ruled that Doldol did not acquire an imperfect title or right to a land grant since he only occupied the land starting in 1959, which was after the 1945 date required by law to claim public
Sometime in 1959, respondent Nicanor Doldol occupied a portion of
land in Barrio Pontacan, Municipality of Opol, Misamis Oriental. Meanwhile, the Provincial Board of Misamis Oriental passed a resolution in 1965 reserving Lot 4932, Cad-237, Opol Cadastre as a school site included the area occupied by Doldol. On November 2, 1987, then President Corazon Aquino issued Proclamation No. 180 reserving the area, including the portion in dispute, for the Opol High School, Needing the area, the school made several demands for Doldol to vacate said portion, but he refused to move. In view of Doldols refusal to vacate, Opol National School filed in 1991 a complaint for accion possessoria with the RTC of Cagayan de Oro. The RTC ruled in the school’s favour. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision ruling that Doldol was entitled to the portion he occupied, he having possessed the same for thirty-two years, from 1959 up to the time of the filing of the complaint in 1991. Opol National School elevated the case to SC.
ISSUE:
1. Whether the respondent acquired an imperfect title or a right to a
grant without a title for possessing the land for 32 years.
RULING:
1. No. To acquire a right to a grant, a government grant, without the
necessity of a certificate of title being issued, the applicant must prove (a) that the land is alienable public land and (b) that his open, continuous, exclusive and notorious possession and occupation of the same must either be since time immemorial or for the period prescribed in the Public Land Act. The evidence presented shows that the land in dispute is alienable and disposable. However, Doldol could not have acquired an imperfect title to the disputed lot since his occupation of the same started only in 1959, much later than June 12, 1945. Not having complied with the conditions set by law, Doldol cannot be said to have acquired a right to the land in question as to segregate the same from the public domain. Doldol cannot, therefore, assert a right superior to the school, given that then President Corazon Aquino had reserved the lot for Opol National School.