Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Documantery Sexual Harrasment
Documantery Sexual Harrasment
We are three scholars who have specialized in the scientific study of sexual abuse,
rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment over several decades.
Let’s start by defining each of these terms. Then, we can look at how these behaviors
sometimes overlap.
Sexual abuse
The term that has been in the news most recently with reference to sports doctor Larry
Nassar’s trial is sexual abuse, a form of mistreating children. Sexual abuse is
mainly used to describe behavior toward children, not adults.
All 50 states have laws that recognize that children are not capable of giving informed
consent to any sex act. In the United States, the age at which consent can be given
ranges from 16 to 18 years.
Sexual abuse can include many different things, from touching a victim in a sexual
manner to forcing a victim to touch the perpetrator in a sexual way to making a victim
look at sexual body parts or watch sexual activity. Sexual abuse of a child is a criminal
act.
Rape
In 2012, the FBI issued a revised definition of rape as “penetration, no matter how
slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex
organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” The revised law is gender
neutral, meaning that anyone can be a victim.
When carefully examined, the FBI definition does not look like most people’s idea of
rape – typically perpetrated by a stranger through force. The FBI definition says nothing
about the relationship between the victim and the perpetrator and it says nothing about
force. It does, however, say something about consent, or rather, the lack of it. Think
about consent as your ability to make a decision about what happens to your body.
A perpetrator can compel a victim into a penetrative sex act in multiple ways. A
perpetrator can ignore verbal resistance – like saying “no,” “stop” or “I don’t want to” –
or overpower physical resistance by holding a person down so they cannot move. A
person can penetrate a victim who is incapable of giving consent because he or she is
drunk, unconscious, asleep, or mentally or physically incapacitated; or can threaten or
use physical force or a weapon against a person. Essentially, these methods either ignore
or remove the person’s ability to make an autonomous decision about what happens to
their body. State laws vary in how they define removing or ignoring consent.
Perpetrators can’t defend against charges of rape by claiming they were drunk
themselves or by saying they are married to the victim.
Sexual assault
Rape and sexual assault have been used interchangeably in coverage of events leading to
the #MeToo movement, and this practice, though unintentional, is confusing. In
contrast to the specific criminal act of rape, the term sexual assault can describe a range
of criminal acts that are sexual in nature, from unwanted touching and kissing, to
rubbing, groping or forcing the victim to touch the perpetrator in sexual ways. But
sexual assault overlaps with rape because the term includes rape.
Social and behavioral scientists often use the term “sexual violence.” This term is far
more broad than sexual assault. It include acts that are not codified in law as
criminal but are harmful and traumatic. Sexual violence includes using false promises,
insistent pressure, abusive comments or reputational threats to coerce sex acts. It can
encompass noncontact acts like catcalls and whistles, which can make women feel
objectified and victimized. It includes nonconsensual electronic sharing of explicit
images, exposure of genitals and surreptitious viewing of others naked or during sex.
Sexual harassment
Sexual harassment is a much broader term than sexual assault, encompassing three
categories of impermissible behavior.
One is sexual coercion – legally termed “quid pro quo harassment” – referring to
implicit or explicit attempts to make work conditions contingent upon sexual
cooperation. The classic “sleep with me or you’re fired” scenario is a perfect example of
sexual coercion. It is the most stereotypical form of sexual harassment, but also the
rarest.
A second, and more common, form of sexual harassment is unwanted sexual attention:
unwanted touching, hugging, stroking, kissing, relentless pressure for dates or sexual
behavior. Note that romantic and sexual overtures come in many varieties at work, not
all of them harassing. To constitute unlawful sexual harassment, the sexual advances
must be unwelcome and unpleasant to the recipient. They must be “sufficiently severe or
pervasive” to “create an abusive working environment,” according to the U.S. Supreme
Court.
Unwanted sexual attention can include sexual assault and even rape. If an employer
were to forcibly kiss and grope a receptionist without her consent, this would be an
example of both unwanted sexual attention and sexual assault – both a civil offense and
a crime.
Most sexual harassment, however, entails no sexual advance. This third and most
common manifestation is gender harassment: conduct that disparages people based on
gender, but implies no sexual interest. Gender harassment can include crude sexual
terms and images, for example, degrading comments about bodies or sexual activities,
graffiti calling women “cunts” or men “pussies.” More often than not, though, it is purely
sexist, such as contemptuous remarks about women being ill-suited for leadership or
men having no place in childcare. Such actions constitute “sexual” harassment because
they are sex-based, not because they involve sexuality.