o NEED FOR WHOLESOME SELF-CONCEPT

 SELF TO NATURAL ENVIRONMENT

INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING
o NEED FOR PROTECTION FROM MAN &
NATURE
INTRODUCTION:
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR INFLUENCES ON
HOUSING
HOUSING CHOICE
 GENERALLY REFERS TO THE SOCIAL PROBLEM
OF ENSURING THAT MEMBERS OF SOCIETY
HOUSEHOLD TYPE
HAVE A HOME IN WHICH TO LIVE, WHETHER
 AGE
THIS IS A HOUSE, OR SOME OTHER KIND OF
DWELLING, LODGING, OR SHELTERS.  TYPE
 SIZE
INFLUENCES ON HOUSING CHOICE AND  STAGE IN LIFE CYCLE
BEHAVIORS
SOCIAL CLASS
 INCOME
HUMAN ECOLOGY MODEL
 OCCUPATION
 SELF
 EDUCATION
 BUILT ENVIRONMENT
 SOCIO-CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT
HOUSING VALUES
 NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
 ECONOMY
 FAMILY
MEETS NEEDS
 PERSONAL
 SOCIAL PRESTIGE
NEEDS CAN BE RANKED IN ORDER OF THEIR
IMPORTANCE
VALUES
 PRIMARY NEEDS ARE PHYSICAL IN NATURE &
 REPRESENT PERSON’S BELIEFS ABOUT LIFE &
HAVE PRIORITY
ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR
 SECONDARY NEEDS ARE LARGELY
 TRANSCEND SITUATIONS OR EVENTS & ARE
PSYCHOLOGICAL OR SOCIAL-IMPORTANT FOR
ENDURING BECAUSE THEY ARE CENTRAL IN
QUALITY OF LIFE
PERSONALITY STRUCTURE
 ROKEACH VALUE SURVEY
MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS
 PHYSIOLOGICAL NEEDS
LIFESTYLE
 SECURITY AND SAFETY NEEDS
 CULTURAL ORIENTATION
 SENSE OF BELONGING
 GENERATION DIFFERENCES
 SELF ESTEEM NEEDS
o SENIORS
 SELF-ACTUALIZATION
o BOOMERS
o GEN X’ERS
HUMAN ECOLOGY AND HOUSING NEEDS
o MILLENIALS
 SELF TO BUILT ENVIRONMENT
o NEED FOR A SENSE OF PLACE OR
HOUSING NORMS
ROOTEDNESS
 TENURE
o NEED FOR CREATIVE OUTLET
 SPACE
 SELF TO SOCIO-CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT
 STRUCTURE TYPE
o NEED TO FULFILL VALUES
 QUALITY
o NEED TO RELATE TO OTHERS
 NEIGHBORHOOOD/LOCATION
o NEED FOR SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL
STIMULATION  EXPENDITURES
 o THIS IS THE SENSE OF WHAT IS FITTING,
BEHAVIORS IN THE ENVIRONMENT HARMONIOUS OR BEAUTIFUL
5. LIFESTYLE
SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS o WHEN SELECTING A HOME, ONE NEEDS TO
CONSIDER THE LIFESTYLES OF ALL FAMILY
PROXEMICS MEMBERS
 INTIMATE
 PERSONAL HOUSING PROBLEMS
 SOCIAL 1.
 PUBLIC 2. ROBUST POPULATION GROWTH
 PERSONAL SPACE 3.
 SEATING 4. INDUSTRIALIZATION
 PRIVACY 5. MINIMUM WAGE OF FILIPINOS
 CROWDING
GOVERNMENT’S HELP TO SOLVE HOUSING PROBLEMS
 SOCIOFUGAL & SOCIOPETAL ARRANGEMENTS
 TERRITORIALITY
GOVERNMENT FUNDED WAS ESTABLISHED AFTER THE
NEED FOR SAFE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING
PERSONALIZING SPACE
PRESENTED ITSELF. ONCE CREATED, LOW-INCOME
 POSSESSIONS
FAMILIES WERE PROVIDED WITH A ROOF OVER THEIR
 CLAIMING SPACES
HEAD THAT THEY COULD AFFORD. GOVERNMENT
 DISPLAYING ITEMS FUNDED HOUSING IS NOT JUST RESERVED FOR
 SYMBOLS OF SELF APARTMENTS, BUT SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

HOUSING IN THE PHILIPPINES KEY AGENCIES IN HOUSING:

OBJECTIVES HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING

 LIST THE FACTORS AFFECTING HOUSING NEEDS COUNCIL (HUDCC)
 IDENTIFY THE HOUSING PROBLEMS IN THE  CREATING THRU EXECUTIVE ORDER NO.90, IS
PHILIPPINES THE HIGHEST POLICY MAKING AND UMBRELLA
 KNOW THE GOVERNMENT’S HELP TO SOLVE ORGANIZATION WHICH CONSISTS OF FOUR
HOUSING PROBLEMS HOUSING AGENCIES.

FACTORS THAT AFFECT HOUSING NEEDS NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY (NHA)

 THE FIRST STEP IN BUYING A HOME IS  A GOVERNMENT-OWNED AND CONTROLLED
KNOWING WHAT TYPE OF HOUSING BEST SUITS CORPORATION OPERATING UNDER THE POLICY
YOUR FAMILY NEEDS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISION OF THE
 VARY ACCORDING TO FAMILY LIFE STAGES, OR HUDCC.
YOUR PERCEPTION OF WHAT YOU NEED IN A  THE NHA IS THE SOLE GOVERNMENT AGENCY
HOUSE. TO ENGAGE IN SHELTER PRODUCTION,
FOCUSING ITS EFFORTS TO PROVIDE TO
1. CLIMATE HOMELESS, LOW-INCOME FILIPINO FAMILIES.
o CAN VARY FROM WARM TO COLD, AND
DRY TO HUMID PAGTUTULUNGAN SA KINABUKASAN: IKAW, BANGKO,
2. PLACEMENT OF THE HOME INDUSTRIYA AT GOBYERNO (PAG-IBIG FUND)
3. COST  TO PROVIDE ITS MEMBERS WITH ADEQUATE
o COST IS A CRUCIAL FACTOR IN HOUSING HOUSING THROUGH AN EFFECTIVE SAVINGS
NEEDS FOR ALMOST EVERYONE SCHEME, PAG-IBIG FUND HARNESSES THESE
4. TASTE FOUR SECTORS OF PHILIPPINE SOCIETY:
 o FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS b. TO TAKE DEVELOPING AND ADMINISTERING
o INDUSTRIAL SECTOR SOCIAL HOUSING PROGRAMS, PARTICULARLY
o THE GOVERNMENT THE COMMUNITY MORTGAGE PROGRAM
o FILIPINO PEOPLE (CMP) AND THE ABOT-KAYA PABAHAY FUND
 THE FUND WAS CREATED TO ADDRESS TWO OF (AKPF) PROGRAM
THE NATION’S BASIC CONCERNS:
a. THE GENERATION OF SAVINGS PHILIPPINE LAWS ON HOUSING AND
b. PROVIDING SHELTER FOR FILIPINO
HUMAN SETTLEMENTS
WORKERS

HOUSING AND LAND USE REGULATORY BOARD PHILIPPINE LAWS ON HOUSING

(HLURB)
 A NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY TASKED AS A. URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING ACT
THE PLANNING, REGULATORY AND QUASI- (RA 7279)
JUDICIAL BODY FOR LAND USE DEVELOPMENT  DATED OF EFFECTIVITY: 29TH OF MARCH 1992
AND REAL ESTATE AND HOUSING REGULATION.
THESE ROLES ARE DONE VIA A TRIAD OF 1. CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS:
STRATEGIES NAMELY, POLICY DEVELOPMENT,
PLANNING AND REGULATION. ART. 13 SOCIAL JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS

HOME GUARANTY CORPORATION (HGC) SEC. 9. THE STATE SHALL, BY LAW AND FOR THE
 IS THE GOVERNMENT-OWNED-AND- COMMON GOOD UNDERTAKE, IN
CONTROLLED-CORPORATION (GOCC) COOPERATION WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR, A
MANDATED BY THE LAW (RA 8763) TO CONTINUING PROGRAM OF URBAN LAND
PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE HOME OWNERSHIP BY REFORM AND HOUSING WHICH WILL MAKE
PROVIDING RISK COVERAGE OR GUARANTEES AVAILABLE AT AFFORDABLE COST DECENT
AND TAX/FISCAL INCENTIVES TO BANKS AND HOUSING AND BASIC SERVICES TO UNDER
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS/INVESTORS PRIVILEDGED AND HOMELESS CITIZENS IN
GRANTING HOUSING DEVELOPMENT URBAN CENTERS AND RESETTLEMENT AREAS. IT
LOANS/CREDITS, AND HOME FINANCING. AS SHALL ALSO PROMOTE ADEQUATE
HGC FOCUSES ON PROMOTING HOME EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES TO CITIZENS. IN
OWNERSHIP TO MIDDLE AND LOW-INCOME THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUCH PROGRAMS
FAMILIES. THE STATE SHALL RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF
SMALL PROPERTY OWNERS.
NATIONAL HOME MORTGAGE FINANCE CORPORATION
(NHMFC) SEC. 10. URBAN OR RURAL POOR DWELLERS
 MANDATE OF INCREASING THE AVAILABILITY SHALL NOT BE EVICTED NOR THEIR DWELLINGS
OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING LOANS TO FINANCE DEMOLISHED, EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE FILIPINO HOMEBUYER ACQUISITION OF LAW AND IN A JUST AND HUMANE MANNER.
HOUSING UNITS THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT
AND OPERATION OF A SECONDARY MARKET NO RESETTLEMENT OF URBAN OR RURAL
FOR HOME MORTGAGES. DWELLERS SHALL BE UNDERTAKEN WITHOUT
ADEQUATE CONSULTATION WITH THEM AND
SOCIAL HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION (SHFC) THE COMMUNITIES WHERE THEY ARE TO BE
 MANDATED: RELOCATED.
a. TO UNDERTAKE SOCIAL HOUSING PROGRAMS
THAT WILL CATER TO THE FORMAL AND 2. OBJECTIVES:
INFORMAL SECTORS IN THE LOW-INCOME
BRACKET;
 a. MAKE AVAILABLE TO UNDERPRIVILEGED AND DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION COUNCIL
HOMELESS CITIZENS DECENT HOUSING AT (HUDCC) IN COORDINATION WITH ALL LOCAL
AFFORDABLE COST; GOVERNMENT UNITS AND OTHER CONCERNED
b. PROVIDE FOR RATIONAL USE AND PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS.
DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN LAND;
c. REGULATE AND DIRECT URBAN GROWTH AND UDHA SOCIALIZED HOUSING PROGRAM
EXPANSION TOWARDS A DISPERSED URBAN
NET AND MORE BALANCED URBAN-RURAL THE HOUSING PROGRAM OF THE LAW PROVIDES
INTERDEPENDENCE; FOR:
d. PROVIDE FOR AN EQUITABLE LAND TENURE  BENEFICIARY LISTING (COMING UP WITH A
SYSTEM THAT SHALL GUARANTEE SECURITY OF MASTER LIST OF BENEFICIARIES WITHIN ONE
TENURE TO PROGRAM BENEFICIARIES BUT YEAR FROM THE EFFECTIVITY OF THE LAW)
SHALL RESPECT THE RIGHTS OF SMALL  LAND INVENTORY (WITHIN THE TERRITORIAL
PROPERTY OWNERS AND ENSURE THE JURISDICTION OF LGUs)
PAYMENT OF JUST COMPENSATION.  IDENTIFICATION OF SOCIALIZED HOUSING SITES
e. ENCOURAGE MORE EFFECTIVE PEOPLE’S  DISPOSITION OF LANDS FOR SOCIALIZED
PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOUSING
PROCESS
f. IMPROVE THE CAPABILITY OF LOCAL UDHA RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM
GOVERNMENT UNITS IN UNDERTAKING URBAN
DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING PROGRAMS AND
 RESETTLEMENT OF PERSONS LIVING IN DANGER
PROJECTS.
AREAS (ESTEROS, RAILROAD TRACKS, GARBAGE
DUMP, RIVERBANKS SHORELINES AND
3. BENEFICIARIES
WATERWAYS) AND PUBLIC PLACES (SIDEWALKS,
ROADS, PARKS AND PLAYGROUNDS)
 MUST BE A MALE OR FEMALE FILIPINO
 THE LGUs, IN COORDINATION WITH THE
UNDERPRIVILEGED AND HOMELESS CITIZEN NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, ARE TASKED
(INDIVIDUAL/FAMILIES IN
TO PROVIDE RELOCATION OR RESETTLEMENT
URBAN/URBANIZABLE AREAS WHOSE SITES WITH BASIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES
INCOME/COMBINED HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS AND ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES
WITHIN POVERTY THRESHOLD AND WHO DO
SUFFICIENT TO MEET THE BASIC NEEDS OF THE
NOT OWN HOUSING FACILITIES AND THOSE
AFFECTED FAMILIES.
WHO DO NOT ENJOY SECURITY OF TENURE)
 THE LAW REQUIRES THAT THIS PROGRAM BE
 MUST NOT OWN REAL PROPERTY IN URBAN OR UNDERTAKEN WITHIN 2 YEARS FROM THE DATE
RURAL AREAS
OF ITS EFFECTIVITY (MARCH 29, 1992 - MARCH
 NOT A PROFESSIONAL SQUATTER OR NOT A 29, 1994)
MEMBER OF SQUATTING SYNDICATES
BALANCED HOUSING PROGRAM
4. SALIENT PROVISIONS
 DEVELOPERS OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING PROJECTS ARE REQUIRED TO DEVELOP AN AREA
FRAMEWORK FOR SOCIALIZED HOUSING EQUIVALENT TO AT
LEAST 20% OF THE TOTAL SUBDIVISION AREA
 A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR URBAN AND OR TOTAL SUBDIVISION COST WITH THE
URBANIZABLE AREAS TO SERVE AS BASIS FOR OPTION TO COMPLY INSTEAD THROUGH ANY
ACHIEVING THE OBJECTIVES OF THE LAW. OF THE FOLLOWING:
 FORMULATED BY THE HOUSING AND LAND USE
REGULATORY BOARD (HLURB) UNDER THE - DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW SETTLEMENT;
DIRECTION OF THE HOUSING AND URBAN - SLUM UPGRADING;
- JOINT-VENTURE PROJECTS WITH LGUs OR ANY THE DEMOLITION OF THEIR HOUSES OR DWELLING
HOUSING AGENCY; OR UNITS FOR A PERIOD OF 3 YEARS FROM THE
- PARTICIPATION IN THE COMMUNITY EFFECTIVITY OF THE LAW (MARCH 29, 1992 -
MORTGAGE PROGRAM MARCH 29, 1995), THIS WHILE THE PROGRAM
COMPONENTS, I.E., THE HOUSING PROGRAM,
EVICTION AND DEMOLITION (RULES AND RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM, BALANCED HOUSING
PROCEDURE) PROGRAM ARE BEING ACCOMPLISHED OR
OTHERWISE SET IN PLACE.
THE LAW DISCOURAGES DEMOLITION AS A
PRACTICE. EVICTION OR DEMOLITION MAY BE B. COMPREHENSIVE AND INTEGRATED
ALLOWED ONLY WHEN: SHELTER FINANCE ACT (RA 7835)

a. PERSONS/ENTITIES OCCUPY DANGER AREAS INCREASING AND REGULARIZING YEARLY

b. PERSONS/ENTITIES OCCUPY PUBLIC PLACES APPROPRIATION OF THE MAJOR COMPONENTS OF
c. PLACE OCCUPIED IS A GOVERNMENT THE NATIONAL SHELTER PROGRAM. IT CONSISTS
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT SITE THE FOLLOWING MAJOR COMPONENT PROGRAMS:
d. THERE IS A COURT ORDER FOR EVICTION OR
DEMOLITION - RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM
e. CONSTRUCTION FALLS UNDER THE CATEGORY: - MEDIUM-RISE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HOUSING
NEW ILLEGAL STRUCTURE (CONSTRUCTION - COMMUNITY MORTGAGE PROGRAM
AFTER MARCH 29, 1992) - COST-RECOVERABLE PROGRAMS
f. STRUCTURE BELONGS TO A PROFESSIONAL - LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAM
SQUATTER OR A MEMBER OF A SQUATTING
SYNDICATE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM

IN THE EXECUTION OF EVICTION OR DEMOLITION  TARGET BENEFICIARIES: FAMILIES DISPLACED

INVOLVING UNDERPRIVILEGED AND HOMELESS BY GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS;
CITIZENS, THE FOLLOWING ARE MANDATORY: (SEC. THOSE OCCUPYING DANGER AREAS SUCH AS
28, UDHA, IMPLEMENTING RULES AND WATERWAYS, ESTEROS, RAILROAD TRACKS,
REGULATIONS) ETC.; AND, THOSE QUALIFIED FOR RELOCATION
AND RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCEE UNDER
- 30-DAY NOTICE UDHA
- ADEQUATE CONSULTATION
- ONLY DURING OFFICE HOURS AND GOOD  IT HAS 3 TYPES OF PROGRAM DELIVERY
WEATHER SCHEME:
- PRESENCE OF LGU OFFICIALS - NHA-ADMINISTERED RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM
- ALL THOSE PARTICIPATING IN DEMOLITIONS - RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR
MUST HAVE PROPER ID LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS (THE LGUs SHALL
- THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE SHALL BE IN PROVIDE THE LAND WHILE THE NHA PROVIDES
PROPER UNIFORM (THEIR TASK IS NOT TO FUNDS FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT)
DEMOLISH BUT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND - RESETTLEMENT PROGRAM WITH OTHER
DISTURBANCE CONTROL ONLY) GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND THE PRIVATE
- HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE USED SECTOR (MAY INCLUDE 20% BALANCED
EXCEPT FOR CONCRETE STRUCTURES HOUSING BY DEVELOPERS)

MORATORIUM ON EVICTION AND DEMOLITION MEDIUM-RISE PRIVATE AND PUBLIC HOUSING

(TOTAL APPROPRIATION IN 5 YEARS: 3BILLION)
THERE SHALL BE A MORATORIUM ON THE
EVICTION OF ALL PROGRAM BENEFICIARIES AND ON  TARGET BENEFICIARIES:
- FOR MEDIUM-RISE PUBLIC HOUSING: CITY THE LOWEST LOAN PACKAGE UNDER THE
RELOCATION ALTERNATIVE FOR FAMILIES UNIFIED HOME LANDING PROGRAM.
AFFECTED BY RELOCATION ACTIVITIES AND
QUALIFIED FOR ASSISTANCE UNDER UDHA LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAM (TOTAL
- FOR MEDIUM-RISE PRIVATE HOUSING: APPROPRIATION IN 5 YEARS: 3 BILLION)
HOUSING OPTION TO LOW-INCOME FAMILIES
AND TO PROVIDE RENTAL HOUSING STOCK IN  PURPOSE: TO ENSURE THE EQUITABLE
HIGH-DENSITY URBAN AREAS DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSING BENEFITS
NATIONWIDE
 IMPLEMENTOR: NATIONAL HOUSING AUTORITY  SCOPE: ELECTED URBAN AND URBANIZABLE
WITH THE PARTICIPATION OF OTHER AREAS IN ALL CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, LOCAL  LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS MAY AVAIL OF THE
GOVERNMENT UNITS AND THE PRIVATE PROGRAM, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
SECTOR CONDITIONS:

 MANNER OF ACQUISITION: UNITS ARE TO BE C. PD 772: ANTI-SQUATTING LAW (CRIMINAL

DISPOSED EITHER THROUGH: OUTRIGHT SALE LAW)
OR LEASE, DEPENDING ON THE AFFORDABILITY
OF THE BENEFICIARIES COMMITTED BY ANY PERSON WHO SUCCEEDS IN
OCCUPYING OR POSSESSING THE REAL PROPERTY
COMMUNITY MORTGAGE PROGRAM (TOTAL OF ANOTHER AGAINST THE LATTER’S WILL
APPROPRIATION IN 5 YEARS: 12.78 BILLION) THROUGH ANY OF THE FOLLOWING MEANS:
 FORCE
 GOVERNED BY ALL EXISTING CMP GUIDELINES  INTIMIDATION
ISSUED BY NHMFC  THREAT
 KEY PLAYERS:  TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE ABSENCE OR
- NHMFC - PRIMARY IMPLEMENTOR TOLERANCE OF THE LANDOWNER FOR
- GOV’T AGENCIES, LGUs, NGOs, AND POs AS RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OR ANY OTHER
ORIGINATORS PURPOSES
- COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONS
- LANDOWNER D. EJECTMENT LAWS (CIVIL LAW)

COST RECOVERABLE PROGRAMS (TOTAL  FORCIBLE ENTRY: COMMITTED BY ANY PERSON

APPROPRIATION IN 5 YEARS: 2.542 BILLION) WHO DEPRIVES ANOTHER OF THE POSSESSION
OF ANY LAND OR BUILDING BY ANY OF THE
 UNDERTAKEN BY GOVERNMENT THROUGH THE FOLLOWING ACTS:
NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY IN - FORCE
COOPERATION WITH LGUs, HOUSING - INTIMIDATION
COOPERATIVES, NGOs, POs, LANDOWNERS, - STEALTH
DEVELOPERS AND OTHER GOVERNMENT - THREAT; OR
AGENCIES - STRATEGY
 COST OF LAND, LAND DEVELOPMENT AND
HOUSING CONSTRUCTION ARE TO BE  UNLAWFUL DETAINER: COMMITTED BY ANY
RECOVERED FROM THE TARGET BENEFICIARIES PERSON WHO HAS AN EXPIRED OR
 AT LEAST 60% OF THE TOTAL NUMBER OF THE TERMINATED RIGHT TO HOLD POSSESSION BY
HOUSE AND LOT PACKAGES TO BE PRODUCED VIRTUE OF CONTRACT, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
UNDER THIS PROGRAM SHALL CORRESPOND TO UNLAWFULLY WITHHOLDING POSSESSION
FROM LANDLORD/VENDOR/VENDER OR OTHER
PERSON LEGALLY ENTITLED TO POSSESSION
 - DEALING WITH URBAN DEVELOPMENT THAT
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND TAKES PLACE OVER A PROTRACTED TIME
 WILL BE REVIEWED FOR CONSISTENCY WITH
HOUSING FRAMEWORK (NUDHF 2009-
FUTURE MTPDP
2016)
B. CONTEXT AND STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS
FRAMEWORK VISION TOWARDS 2016
 RECOGNIZE THE ARENA OR URBAN
A. VISION AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES COMPETITION AND BUILD ON STRENGTHS
- FUTURE OF THE COUNTRY
 THE VISION FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT IS AN o DEPENDS ON THE PERFORMANCE
URBAN SYSTEM THAT:  URBAN SYSTEMS
- FACILITATES ECONOMIC GROWTH  DEPENDS
- DEVELOPS AND STRENGTHENS LOCAL o COMPETITIVENESS TO OTHER
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES URBAN AREAS OF THE WORLD
- SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES THE QUALITY OF LIFE - CAPITAL FLOWS TO THE PHILIPPINES
OF ITS RESIDENTS o INFLUENCED
 MANAGEMENT & PERFRORMANCE OF
FOUR PRINCIPLES: THE BUSINESS, SOCIAL AND PHYSICAL
ENVIRONMENT OF
1. STRATEGIC CHARACTER  METRO MANILA
IT ASSUMES THE RESOURCES FOR URBAN  OTHER URBAN REGIONS
DEVELOPMENT ARE LIMITED  VARIETY OF CULTURAL EXPERIENCES
 KEY URBAN DEVELOPMENT ISSUES:  THE AIR QUALITY
- IDENTIFIED  EFFICIENCY OF TRANSPORTATION
- SPECIFIC COURSES OF ACTIONS HAVEE TO BE SYSTEM
PRIORITIZED
 IDENTIFY PRIORITY ACTIONS
2. FOCUS ON DRIVERS - SHOULD ADDRESS CAUSES RATHER THAN
 THE FOCUS ON “DRIVERS” (RATHER THAN THE SYMPTOMS OF DEVELOPMENT ISSUES EVEN
SYMPTOMS) OF KEY ISSUES AND PROBLEMS RESOURCES ARE LIMITED
 FACTORS THAT UNDERLIE EXISTING - TOP PRIORITY – LEAD – LARGEST POSITIVE
CONDITIONS DESCRIBE NOT SUFFICIENTLY IMPACTS
IDENTIFIED AND EXPLAINED o TO MANY PEOPLE
 IDENTIFICATION OF THESE UNDERLYING  LEASE AMOUNT OF RESOURCES
FACTORS  SHORTEST POSSIBLE TIME
KEY TO FORMULATION
- EFFECTIVE URBAN DEVELOPMENT  EMPHASIZE SHORT TERM ACTIONS WITHOUT
- HOUSING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS LOSING SIGHT OF STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
- REQUIRES ACTIONS WHICH DEMONSTRATE
3. INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS IMMEDIATE IMPACTS
ASSESSES THE CAPACITY OF THE CURRENT - ISSUES CANNOT BE RESOLVED IN THE SHORT
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS TO CARRY TERM
OUT THE RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES o OBJECTIVE
 TO AVOID QUICK – FIX COSMETIC
4. MEDIUM TO LONG-TERM PERSPECTIVE PRODUCTS
 IT EXTENDS ITS PERSPECTIVE AND ANALYSIS o INSTEAD
BEYOND THE MEDIUM AND LONG-TERM  IMPLEMENT PROJECTS THAT YIELD VISIBLE
PERIOD
  INITIATE MORE SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS o MANUFACTURING AND
IN THE FUTURE o PRODUCER SERVICES
- FOCUS EXPORT-ORIENTED ACTIVITIES
 ENHANCE COORDINATIVE MECHANISMS AT
VARIOUS LEVELS  INCREASE METRO MANILA’S ATTRACTIVENESS
SINCE A LARGE AMOUNT OF FUNDS AS A GLOBAL SERVICE CENTER AND VISITORS
CONTINUES TO BE SOURCED FROM THE DESTINATION
NATIONA GOVERNMENT AND ALSO BECAUSE - IMPROVING BASIC FUNCTIONS
MAJOR INVESTMENTS REQUIRE THE APPROVAL - ADDRESSING TRAFFIC CONGESTIONS
OF NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, SUCH - MOBILITY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES WILL HAVE - POLLUTION
TO BE FACILITATED AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL.  SUPPORT IT ENABLED SERVICES
 SUPPORT TOURISM SECTOR
 ENHANCE PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE
- REORIENT POLITICAL LEADERS POVERTY ALLEVIATION
IN THE FINAL ANALYSIS, THE SUCCESS  URBAN-RURAL LINKAGES
OF PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS IN HOUSING  POPULATION MANAGEMENT
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT RESTS WITH LOCAL  HR AND LIVELIHOOD
POLITICAL LEADERS.
IDEALLY, LOCAL POLITICAL LEADERS HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND DELIVERY
SHOULD SUBMERGE POLITICAL INTERESTS IN  LOCAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING
FAVOR OF THE OVERALL WELFARE OF THEIR  LAND ACCESS AND MANAGEMENT
RESPECTIVE COMMUNITIES  EXPLORE PROMISING FINANCING SOURCES AND
SCHEMES
ELEMENTS OF A FRAMEWORK
SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
THREE BASIC THEMES  USE MARKET-BASED INCENTIVES AND
1. THE URBAN SYSTEM DISINCENTIVES
o URBAN COMPETITIVENESS  SUSTAINABLE PLANNING/GREEN BUILDING
o POVERTY REDUCTION
 INTEGRATE CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTION AND
2. HOUSING AND COMMUNITIES
DISASTER RISKS MANAGEMENT
o HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND DELIVERY
o SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
THE BASIC APPROACH
3. GOVERNANCE
o PERFORMANCE
A. DEFINING AND DESCRIBING THE CURRENT
URBAN SYSTEM
STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATION
- TRENDS
- ISSUES & PROBLEMS
1. URBAN COMPETITIVENESS
2. POVERTY ALLEVIATION
B. IDENTIFICATION OF THE INTERNAL AND
3. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY AND DELIVERY
EXTERNAL DRIVERS OF THE URBAN SYSTEM
4. SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES
5. PERFORMANCE ORIENTED GOVERNANCE
C. DETERMINING THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS:
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND
URBAN COMPETITIVENESS
HOUSING FRAMEWORK
 IMPROVE NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
- INCREASING PRODUCTIVITY AND EFFICIENCY OF
URBAN REGIONS
NATIONAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND
- BUILD ON EXISTING STRENGTH IN: HOUSING FRAMEWORK 2017-2022
 EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE AND TO PROMOTE
INTRODUCTION GENERAL WELFARE

 THE NUDHF PROVIDES AN OVERACHING ANCHORS

FRAMEWORK FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND
HOUSING, CONSISTING OF A VISION, POLICY AGENDA 2030 AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
STATEMENTS, AND STRATEGIES, GOALS (SDGs)
ENCOMPASSING CORE DEVELOPMENT SECTORS - AIMS TO “MAKE CITIES AND HUMAN
AND SPATIAL ELEMENTS SETTLEMENTS INCLUSIVE, SAFE, RESILIENT, AND
SUSTAINABLE
LEGAL BASIS:
THE NEW URBAN AGENDA
 URBAN DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING ACT OF - TO ADDRESS URBAN POVERTY AND SOCIAL
1992 EXCLUSION, ENHANCE AND EXTEND HUMAN
- MANDATES THE HOUSING AND LAND USE RIGHTS PERSPECTIVES IN THEIR APPLICATION
REGULATORY BOARD (HLURB), UNDER THE TO CITIES AND HUMAN SETTLEMENTS, AND
DIRECTION OF THE HOUSING AND URBAN EMBRACE A SHIFT IN THE PREDOMINANT
DEVELOPMENT COORDINATING COUNCIL URBAN PATTERN TO MINIMIZE SOCIO-SPATIAL
(HUDCC) AND PURSUANT TO ARTICLE III, SEC 6, INJUSTICES AND ENHANCE EQUITY, SOCIO-
TO FORMULATE THE NUDHF IN COORDINATION SPATIAL INCLUSION, POLITICAL PARTICIPATION,
WITH ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS AND AND A DECENT LIFE FOR ALL INHABITANTS.
OTHER CONCERNED PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
SECTORS. AMBISYON NATIN 2040
- REPRESENTS THE LONG-TERM VISION AND
 CLIMATE CHANGE ACT OF 2009 (CCA) ASPIRATIONS OF THE FILIPINO PEOPLE FOR
- THE CCA AND ITS AMENDING LAWS SEEKS TO THEMSELVES AND FOR THE COUNTRY
BUILD NATIONAL AND LOCAL RESILIENCE TO
CLIMATE CHANGE-RELATED DISASTERS AND URBANIZATION LEVEL, PHILIPPINES, 2007-2010
PROTECT AND ADVANCE THE PEOPLE’S RIGHT URBAN
CENSAL TOTAL URBAN
LEVEL
TO A HEALTHFUL ECOLOGY. YEAR POPULATION POPULATION
(PERCENT)
1970 36,684,486 11,677,820 31.8
 DISASTER RISK REDUCTION MANAGEMENT 1980 48,098,460 18,042,045 37.5
ACT OF 2010 1990 60,697,994 28,500,544 47.0
- PROVIDES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES 2000 88,564,453 37,579,591 48.0
AND PLANS AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF 2007 88,564,453 37,579,591 42.4
ACTIONS AND MEASURES PERTAINING TO ALL 2010 92,335,113 41,855,591 45.3
ASPECTS OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION AND
MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING GOOD PRINCIPLES
GOVERNANCE, RISK ASSESSMENT AND EARLY
WARNING, KNOWLEDGE BUILDING AND  URBANIZATION AS A CATALYST FOR INCLUSIVE
AWARENESS RAISING, REDUCING UNDERLYING GROWTH
RISK FACTORS, AND PREPAREDNESS FOR - MUST DRIVE AND INFLUENCE THE CREATION OF
EFFECTIVE RESPONSE AND EARLY RECOVERY AND TRANSFORMATION TOWARDS
CULTURALLY, SOCIALLY, ECONOMICALLY, AND
 SECTION 16 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT POLITICALLY INCLUSIVE DEVELOPMENT
CODE (RA 7160) - CITIZENSHIP AND EQUAL RIGHTS FOR ALL
- DIRECTS LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS (LGUs) TO INHABITANTS
EXERCISE THEIR POWERS FOR EFFICIENT AND
 CLIMATE CHANGE RESILIENCE AS A BASE FOR - SUPPORT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN
SPATIAL STRUCTURING AND SECTORAL CAPACITY, PROMOTE INTEGRATED
DEVELOPMENT GOVERNANCE
- RESILIENCE AS THE ABILITY OF A LOCALITY AND
ITS CITIZENS TO WITHSTAND IMPACTS BY 2050
- RESILIENCE AS THE FOUNDATION IN PLANNING - 56% WILL BE LIVING IN URBAN AREAS
AND DECISION-MAKING FOR SPACES AND FOR - 75% OF THE COUNTRY’S ECONOMIC OUTPUT
ADDRESSING SECTORAL AND/OR CROSS- ATTRIBUTED TO URBAN AREAS
SECTORAL CHALLENGES - 1.4M INFORMAL SETTLER FAMILIES
NATIONWIDE
 SPATIALLY AND THEMATICALLY INTEGRATED - AVERAGE ANNUAL HOUSING NEED OF 926,077
SETTLEMENTS WITHIN COHERENT AND
EFFICIENT URBAN SYSTEMS AND FORMS REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10884
ACROSS SCALE - REQUIRES DEVELOPERS OF PROPOSED
- URBAN DESIGN THAT AIDS IN THE SUBDIVISION AND CONDOMINIUM PROJECTS
INTEGRATION AND EFFICIENT FUNCTION OF TO DEVELOP AN AREA FOR SOCIALIZED
URBAN ELEMENTS HOUSING EQUIVALENT TO AT LEAST 15% OF
- EFFICIENT URBAN PLANNING AND DESIGN THE TOTAL SUBDIVISION PROJECT COST AND AT
SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ACROSS SCALES FROM LEAST 5% OF THE CONDOMINIUM AREA FOR
SMALLEST TO LARGEST UNIT OR ELEMENT PROJECT COST.
- PHYSICALLY, SPATIALLY, FUNCTIONALLY
CONNECTED AND ACCESSIBLE SYSTEMS URBANIZATION IN THE PHILIPPINES
- URBAN SYSTEMS THAT ARE CAPABLE OF
PRODUCING DESIRED RESULTS WITHOUT IN 2010
WASTING TIME OR ENERGY - 41.9M OF THE 92.3M FILIPINOS LIVED IN
URBAN AREAS
 URBAN AREAS AS ACCESSIBLE PLATFORMS FOR BY 2050
SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY, - 56.3% OF THE TOTAL POPULATION WILL LIVE IN
CULTURAL EXPRESSION, AND INNOVATION URBAN AREAS
- SPACES FOR ALL INHABITANTS, THAT PROMOTE
AND FACILITATE ACTIVITY AND INTERACTION POVERTY INCIDENCE AMONG INDIVIDUALS
- SPACES THAT ALLOW FOR SHELTER, DECENT RESIDING IN URBAN AREAS
WORK AND SECURE LIVELIHOODS, FORMAL
AND INFORMAL ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES PHILIPPINES 11.5
- SPACES THAT PROMOTE IDENTITY AND PRIDE NCR 4.1
OF PLACE CENTRAL LUZON 6.2
- SPACES THAT SUPPORT AND FACILITATE NEW CALABARZON 6.5
TECHNOLOGIES ILOCOS REGION 8.5
ZAMBOANGA PENINSULA 10.6
 PEOPLE’S PARTICIPATION AND DAVAO REGION 11.9
EMPOWERMENT AS FOUNDATIONS OF URBAN MIMAROPA 18.2
GOVERNANCE, FACILITATING, MANAGEMENT, BICOL REGION 19.6
AND FINANCE CENTRAL VISAYAS 20.2
- EQUAL AND SUBSTANTIVE PARTICIPATION OF NORTHERN MINDANAO 21.1
ALL STAKEHOLDERS EASTERN VISAYAS 23.3
- INVOLVEMENT OF MARGINALIZED SECTORS IN WESTERN VISAYAS 25.6
DECISION MAKING FOR PROGRAMMES SOCCSKSARGEN 26.4
CARAGA 29.7
ARMM 36.3
 HOW MANY INFORMAL SETTLERS ARE THERE?
MOST POPULOUS CITIES, 2015
IN TERMS OF INDIVIDUALS THE WORLD BANK
QUEZON CITY 2,936,116 (2017,59) ESTIMATES THAT
MANILA 1,780,148
DAVAO CITY 1,632,991 2.2 MILLION PERSONS OR 5.4% OF THE URBAN
CALOOCAN CITY 1,583,978 POPULATION IN 2012 LIVED IN INFORMAL
CEBU CITY 922,611 SETTLEMENTS, 1.3 MILLION WERE IN METRO
MANILA
PHILIPPINES 100,979,303
METRO MANILA 12,977,253
THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC AND DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY (NEDA) (2017, 12-4) PUTS THE NUMBER
MOST DENSELY POPULATED CITIES AND URBAN
OF INFORMAL SETTLER FAMILIES (ISFs) IN 2011,
AREAS, 2015 BOTH IN URBAN AND RURAL AREAS, AT
PERSONS PER SQUARE KILOMETER
1.5 MILLION FAMILIES
METRO MANILA
MANILA 71,263 REGIONS WITH THE MOST ISFs
MANDALUYONG CITY 41,580 MAGNITUDE AND PERCENTAGE SHARE OF NATIONAL
PASAY CITY 29,815 TOTAL:
CALOOCAN CITY 28,387 METRO MANILA 584,425 39%
NAVOTAS CITY 27,904 CALABARZON 221,284 15%
BICOL 142,028 9%
CITIES/URBAN MUNICIPALITIES OUTSIDE METRO CENTRAL LUZON 117,670 8%
MANILA NORTHERN MINDANAO 82,272 5%

GMA, CAVITE 16,505 WHERE ARE THEY?

ROSARIO, CAVITE 14,547 DANGER AREAS – 767,502 – 51%
MANDAUE CITY, CEBU 14,402 PRIVATELY-OWNED LANDS – 378,517 – 25%
SAN PEDRO CITY, LAGUNA 13,547 GOVERNMENT-OWNED LANDS – 265,361 – 18%
BACOOR CITY, CAVITE 13,009 OTHERS – 6%

POPULATION DENSITY OF KEY CITIES, 2015 GOVERNMENT RESPONSED TO HOUSING

THE POOR AND INFORMAL SETTLERS
BAGUIO CITY, BENGUET 6,005
NAGA, CAMARINES SUR 2,532 GOVERNMENT ADDRESSES THE HOUSING NEED OF
ILOILO CITY, ILOILO 5,719
LOW-INCOME INFORMAL SETTLERS USING THREE
CEBU CITY, CEBU 2,929
APPROACHES:
CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY 1,637
1. OFF-CITY RELOCATION
2. ON SITE UPGRADING
INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS REFLECT THE INABILITY OF
3. OFF SITE, IN-CITY HOUSING
CITIES TO COPE WITH RAPID URBAN GROWTH

 RESETTLEMENT IS OFFERED MAINLY TO LOW-

 THE LACK OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING OPTIONS,
INCOME FAMILIES IN “DANGER AREAS” AND
ESPECIALLY FOR LOW-INCOME FAMILIES, HAS
SITES OF GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE
RESULTED IN THE GROWTH OF HEAVILY
PROJECTS
POPULATED INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS
 THE NHA IS THE SHELTER AGENCY IN CHARGE
 NOT ALL INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS ARE INCOME
OF DEVELOPING RESETTLEMENT SITES
POOR
- MOST OF THESE LARGE-SCALE HOUSING
PROJECT
 o OUTSIDE THE CITY FOR A HUGE HOUSING TARGET
o FAR FROM WORK AND LIVELIHOOD
OPPORTUNITIES, EDUCATIONAL 1.7 MILLION HOUSEHOLDS TARGETED FOR DIRECT
INSTITUTIONS, AND PUBLIC HOSPITALS HOUSING ASSISTANCE FROM 2017-2022

HOUSE AND LOT PAYMENT NHA HOUSING PRODUCTION 836,730

 SUBSIDIZED AMOUNT OF PHP 200/MONTH IN RESETTLEMENT FOR INFORMAL
300,000
THE FIRST FOUR (4) YEARS SETTLER FAMILIES
HOUSING FOR SOLDIERS AND POLICE
 INCREASING INCREMENTALLY UP TO PHP 42,800
PERSONNEL
1,330/MONTH
SETTLEMENTS UPGRADING 39,900
 AWARDEES HAVE UP TO 30 YEARS TO PAY FOR
HOUSING FOR EMPLOYEES 24,000
THEIR HOUSE AND LOT
MIXED-USED DEVELOPMENT 15,800
HOUSING ASSISTANCE FOR CALAMITY
THE COMMUNITY MORTGAGE PROGRAM OF SHFC 414,030
VICTIMS
 LENDS ORGANIZED COMMUNITIES UP TO PHP
COMMUNITY-DRIVEN HOUSING 385,524
100,000/ HOUSEHOLD PURCHASE THE LAND
COMMUNITY MORTGAGE PROGRAM 250,591
THEY HAVE BEEN OCCUPYING FROM A WILLING
HIGH DENSITY HOUSING PROGRAM 134,934
OWNER
RETAIL AND DEVELOPMENT
 COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION – CAN BORROW – 516,957
FINANCING
PHP 30,000 FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT
END-USER FINANCING THROUGH THE
 PHP 120,000 FOR HOUSE CONSTRUCTION/ HOME DEVELOPMENT MUTUAL FUND 516,957
HOUSEHOLD (PAG-IBIG)
 THE GROUP LOAN IS PAID MONTHLY FOR UP TO
25 YEARS AND CARRIES AN INTEREST RATE OF
6% PER ANNUM

PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATIONS

- GRANTS INFORMAL SETTLERS A CHANCE TO

ACQUIRE GOVERNMENT-OWNED LANDS THAT
HAVE NOT BEEN USED FOR THE PURPOSE FOR
WHICH THEY WERE ACQUIRED OR ALLOCATED
- FAMILIES IN PROCLAIMED SITES DO NOT ENJOY
SECURITY OF TENURE UNTIL THEY RECEIVE
THEIR CERTIFICATE OF ENTITLEMENT FOR LOT
AWARD (CELA)

A DROP IN THE BUCKET…

<0.5% THE SHARE OF HOUSING IN THE ANNUAL

NATIONAL BUDGET IS LESS THAN 0.5% OR 0.12% OF
GDP (NEDA 2017, 12-2)

(GAA FOR F.Y. 2017)

FOR 2017, THE NHA AND SHFC RECEIVED 0.39% OF

THE P3.35 TRILLION NATIONAL BUDGET OR P12,965
BILLION