Synthesis Paper Summative
Synthesis Paper Summative
Addelyn Villalobos
Dementia is a life changing illness that commonly results in significant decline in mental
status, functional abilities, every day reasoning and memory loss (Dennis, 2012). Dementia can
also have a negative effect on the overall quality of life for those who have the disease. In the
United States, as many as five billion people suffer from dementia, and that number is expected
to double by the year 2050 due to the increased aging population (American Speech-Language-
Hearing Association, n.d.). This disease has an impact not only on the persons that have it, but
also on the caregivers and hospital staff that work with such patients. There are a variety of
medications that can treat the symptoms of dementia such as aggression and help to slow the
disease process, however, there is no cure for this illness and few current, clinically proven ways
to prevent the onset of dementia (Alzheimer’s Association, n.d.). Researchers have been
analyzing the impacts of early cognitive training and memory therapy on delaying the
development of dementia. Early interventions to retrain the brain or strengthen it prior to the
onset of dementia or early in the disease process may improve outcomes in developing the
disease. This paper addresses the clinical question of; In older adult patients, does implementing
cognitive training and therapy compared to standard care, result in a reduced risk of developing
Literature Search
The database utilized to search for RCTs related to reducing dementia development as
well as a relevant clinical guideline was PubMed. Key search terms for RCTs and a clinical
guideline included dementia, reduced risk, early interventions, memory training, cognitive
training and cognitive impairment. Publication years between 2013 and 2018 were used.
COGNITIVE TRAINING IN DEMENTIA REDUCTION 3
Literature Review
Three RCTs were used to analyze the effects of cognitive training on reducing the risk of
developing dementia and slowing the progression of the disease. Current clinical guidelines for
managing dementia and slowing the development of the disease recommend the use of a
decline in patients with dementia or some form of cognitive impairment (Eperly, 2017). A
recently updated guideline also recommends that physicians may implement cognitive training
for patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor disease for dementia (Peterson et
al., 2018).
A RCT by Edwards et al. (2017) examined various forms of cognitive training found that
ten years following each type of training, speed training had the greatest impact on reduction of
developing dementia. There was a total of 2,802 adults all over the age of 65 and deemed healthy
according to the initial MMSE. The participants were randomized into the intervention group to
receive a type of training (n=698) and a control group that received no training (n=695). Those
who received training were further divided into three subgroups to undergo either speed, memory
or reasoning training. Follow-up exams were given ten years following the study; all participants
completed a baseline cognitive function test prior to training and then repeated the same test ten
years after the training as well as dementia screening using the Mini-mental state examination
(MMSE). The risk of developing dementia was reduced by 29% (P=.049) using speed training.
The RCT also showed that the more training sessions each participant attended, the lower the
risk of dementia, regardless of which type of training was received (P=.38). There were no
Similarly, Olchik et al. (2017), examined the effect of memory training in adults with
existing mild MCI. There was a total of 112 participants, age 60 and older, with varying degrees
and Touchon's criteria were randomized into an intervention group that received memory
training (MT), (n=39), and a control group that did not receive MT (n=36). Participants with no
memory deficits or cognitive impairments were placed into another control group and underwent
training (n=28). All participants were given an assessment consisting of functional tasks to
remember to assess baseline memory abilities. The intervention group received eight memory
training sessions as well as educational resources on memory and aging. The control group
received no training or additional resources. The comparison group received the same eight
training sessions as the intervention group. Results showed significantly high improvements in
memory task performance following training (p=.07). These results suggest that MT improves
memory capabilities in older adults with current memory impairments. Aside from unexplained
disenrollment of participants from the study (30 participants), there were no significant weakness
of this RCT.
On the other hand, a trial by Orell et al. (2017) examined if home delivered cognitive
simulation therapy had a positive effect on the cognition and quality of life for persons with
dementia as well as caregiver emotional health. A total of 356 participants were enrolled.
Participants were all classified as having some form of dementia according to the MMSE and all
participants had a caregiver involved in the study alongside them. Participants were randomized
into an intervention group and a control group. The intervention group participants were assigned
to receive cognitive stimulation therapy from each participants’ respective caregiver (n=180).
The control group received treatment as usual (TAU) (n=176). A MMSE was completed for all
COGNITIVE TRAINING IN DEMENTIA REDUCTION 5
participants before, and thirteen weeks after the therapy sessions as well as a questionnaire called
the Quality of the Carer–Patient Relationship Scale (QCPR) to evaluate caregiver emotional
status and attitude towards their respective patient. Authors reported that participant cognition
and quality of life showed no significant improvements in either group. However, the total
QCPR score of the intervention group did significantly improve compared to the control group
receiving treatment as usual (p=.02). These results suggest that while cognitive stimulation may
not improve function in persons with dementia, caregiver delivered therapy may have a positive
outcome in the care-giver, patient relationship. Weaknesses of the study were that providers of
the therapy were aware of the intervention groups’ assignment and assessment tools were valid
Synthesis
All three studies revealed a positive effect of cognitive training in some form. Dementia
risk was reduced in the study by Edwards at al. (2017) over a ten-year period and cognitive
function and memory was improved following the trainings implemented by Olchik at al. (2017).
Despite not having a significant effect on patient cognition, patient-caregiver relationship was
improved in the study by Orell et al. (2017). This result can be incorporated into determining the
most efficient way to deliver cognitive training to reduce the risk of developing dementia.
A common weakness of the above studies was assessment reliability. The pre- and post-
study assessments for the trials yielded different levels of participant cognitive function after
receiving therapy. An third additional assessment should have been completed after the initial
Clinical Recommendations
Evidence from the studies suggests that early cognitive training, as well as training at the
onset of dementia or MCI may be an effective intervention to reduce the risk of developing
dementia. Cognitive training is supported by the recent updated clinical guideline to reduce even
mild cognitive impairment, which is a precursor for dementia (Peterson et al., 2018). Training
can be done in person or on a computer. Evidence suggests that in-person home delivered
cognitive stimulation therapy is a better method. The study by Orell et al. (2017) supports that
there is a benefit of home delivered therapy from a caregiver; an increased feeling of quality in
the care-giver, patient relationship. Early cognitive training can also improve overall memory as
shown in the study by Olchik et al. (2017). Certain types of cognitive training help to strengthen
cell synapses and connections, hence why this intervention may help to reduce the development
and effects of dementia on the brain over time. This was supported by the longitudinal study by
Edwards et al. (2017) that followed patients for 10-years and demonstrated significant reduction
in dementia.
COGNITIVE TRAINING IN DEMENTIA REDUCTION 7
References
dementia.asp
https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589935289§ion=Resources
Dennis, S. (2012). Prevention and risk of Alzheimer's and dementia. Alzheimer’s Association
_prevention_and_risk.asp
Edwards, J., Xu, H., Clark, D., Guey, L., Ross, L., & Unverzagt., F. (2017). Speed of processing
Eperly, T., Dunay, M., & Boice, J. (2017). Alzheimer’s disease: pharmacologic and
Physician 95(12):771-778.
Ogbru, O. (n.d.). Cholinesterase inhibitors side effects, uses and drug interactions. Medicine Net.
Retrieved from
https://www.medicinenet.com/cholinesterase_inhibitors/article.htm#what_are_cholinester
ase_inhibitors_cheis_how_do_they_work
Olchik, M., Farina, J., Steibel, N., Teixeira, A., & Yassuda, M. (2017). Memory training (MT) in
Orrell, M., Yates, L., Leung, P., Kang, S., Hoare, Z., Whitaker…Orgeta, V. (2017). The impact
Peterson, R., Lopez, O., Armstrong, M., Getchius, T., Ganguli, M., Gloss, D….Rae-Grant, A.
(2018). Practice guideline update summary: mild cognitive impairment: report of the
10.1212/WNL.0000000000004826