Quality Analysis in Construction Projects Using Six Sigma Concept
Quality Analysis in Construction Projects Using Six Sigma Concept
I. INTRODUCTION
Six Sigma is a rigorous, focused, and highly effective implementation of proven quality principles and
techniques. Six Sigma aims for virtually error-free business process. Sigma, σ, is a letter in the Greek alphabet
used by statisticians to measure the variability in any process. Increasing numbers of companies start to integrate
the full implications of Six Sigma. Six Sigma is a quality improvement technique based on statistics, was used
firstly by Motorola in the 1980s. It helps to decrease costs, increase quality by improving process and reduce the
production time. Total Quality Management which is management philosophy focuses on continually work
324 | P a g e
processes. Particularly, Six Sigma became a useful method as a performance indicator and process improver for
the companies from different industry. Six Sigma has statistical and business perspectives and its applications
are improved by Six Sigma Academy. Construction work has fragmented and project-oriented work processes
compared to the manufacturing industry. So, the evaluation of Six Sigma within construction context becomes
an interesting research question considering quality, performance and management aspects. The importance of
quality improvement and excellent performance in the highly competitive world market, lead many
organizations, their top managers, project managers, and engineers to implement the new philosophies such as
pull scheduling and lean principle at their organizations. This paper describes the Six Sigma principle and
framework as a quality improvement strategy through the successful business.
1.1 OBJECTIVES
To study the various defects in construction site which influence the quality of project.
To apply six sigma concepts in construction projects for quality improvement using DMAIC (DESIGN,
MEASURE, ANALYSE, IMPROVE, CONTROL) methodology.
II. METHODOLOGY
Six Sigma continuous improvement methodology which known as DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve,
control) aims to enhance the efficiency of the existing processes and increase customer satisfaction through
designed products and services. DMAIC framework is an integration of several techniques such as QFD (quality
function deployment), SPC (statistical quality control), DOE (design of experiments), and FMEA (failure mode
and effects analysis) in a logical direction . In this study, a survey-based approach is used to identify the
Continuous Improvement initiatives commonly practiced in construction companies as well as understanding
the approach of these companies to Six Sigma. This approach is more suitable when the current design of the
products, services and processes are correct and satisfactory regarding to the requirements, customers and
business. It emphasizes the identification and avoidance of variations. Moreover, six sigma principles underline
the explicit recognition of the root causes of defects and statistical process control to sustain continuous
improvement. This methodology offers structured framework in following steps to establish systematic
continuous improvement.
(i) Define- In this step it is necessary to define customer requirements and any things do not meet those
requirements known as defect, determine key processes, key roles and team charter, define project goals and
scope, and estimate the risks and financial impact.
(ii) Measure-Identify and collect the appropriate data which are relevant to the defects and the processes need
improvement. Measure the processes performance and establish the measurement system based on Six Sigma
techniques and tools.
(iii) Analyze-Study and analyze the data collected in previous step to find out the root causes of the defects and
unsatisfactory performance.
(iv)Improve-Identify alternative solutions and methods based on the knowledge derived from analyze step,
study and assess the potential solutions to distinguish the most successful improvement solution. Implement that
successful method.
325 | P a g e
(v) Control-Establish a control plan to ensure that expected improvement has been achieved, and the knowledge
and experiences have been documented and shared to remain at attained high level performance.
The most common reasons for industries to implement Six Sigma to resolve issues facing the construction
industries :
• Cost reduction
• Cycle time reduction
• Error and waste reduction
• Increase competitive advantage
• Improve customer satisfaction
• Change company culture
• Improve quality.
In the construction industry, the use of the six sigma principle for performance assessments, particularly aimed
at high quality and variability control. Introduced the six sigma principle as one of the approaches to
augmenting productivity, which concentrated on reducing cycle time and eliminating any defects or errors
engaged in the processes.
326 | P a g e
adaptation of the interaction between the researcher and the study participant. In qualitative research, only a
sample (that is, a subset) of a population is selected for any given study. The interview was used specially for
identifying other factors six sigma methods. After preliminary data gathering, questionnaire survey has carried
out to reach the objective of this study among brick work, tile work and painting work based on six sigma
concepts involved in construction projects. Questionnaire survey specifically has been used for evaluation of
various modes of six sigma concepts. The general methodology of this study relies largely on the survey
questionnaire which will be collected from the site engineers, contractor, consultant and project manager by
mail or by personnel meeting. A thorough literature survey was initially conducted to identify the factor of six
sigma performance of construction industry as a whole six sigma. This study has adopted the more general and
broad definition of six sigma.
IV. EVALUATION
Relative importance index (Rii) analysis was employed to measure the likert (ordinal) scale. in this study, five
scale rating was used and the weight was give as below:
1 – Strongly Disagree/ least Important;
2 – Disagree/ Of Little Importance;
3 – Neutral/ Neither Important;
4 – Agree/ Important;
5 – Strongly Agree/ Most Important
The RII was calculated by using the formula as below
RII=ΣW/AN
Where,
W=weight of scale
A=highest weight (5„in this case)
N=total number of respondent.
327 | P a g e
the overall respondents as presented. It shows that top 5 most significant factors of delay factor ranked by
overall respondents are material market rate, contract modification, high level of quality requirement, project
location, depends on the fresher„s to bear the whole responsibility. Material market rate was ranked first (RII) as
agreed by the entire respondent.
328 | P a g e
5.2 SPSS REPORT AND RESULTS
Based on the various factor of questionnaires, analysis for defects in concrete structures, paint work,
brick work, welding and joints with the corresponding mean value and arrange in rank wise. From the
ranking order the top five ranks are selected and separates it for the further evaluation.
329 | P a g e
The following table 5.1 shows the top ranks of defects in concrete structures
The following table 5.2 shows the top ranks of defects in paint work
The following table 5.3 shows top ranks of defects in brick work
The following table shows the top ranks of defects in welding and joints
330 | P a g e
Table 5.4 TOP RANKING OF DEFECTS IN WELDING AND JOINTS
VI. CONCLUSION
The aim of this thesis is to develop a project questionnaire model based on the theory of Six Sigma.
Questionnaire were prepared based on each of the DMAIC phases in the Six Sigma model. The SPSS V.23
software used to analyses the questionnaire factors. The top ranking factor in concrete structures, paint work ,
brick work, welding and joints were found. Results will give a guide on how to implement the project six sigma
model in construction projects thereby increasing the quality. Using the result, Recommendations and
mitigation measures can be given to the construction sites.
REFERENCES
[1] M Oguz , Y. Kim, J. Hutchison, and S. Han, Implementing lean six sigma: A case study in concrete panel
production, ASQ six sigma forum magazine,3(1), 2003, 44.
[2] P.N Sastry, D.M Devi, and S.E. Reddy, Application of Six Sigma for Process Improvement and Variation
Reduction of Automotive Batteries, Journal of Industrial technology, 20(1,2), 2011, 25-31.
[3] C. Manohar , and A. Balakrishna , Defect analysis on cast wheel by six sigma methodology to reduce defects
and improve the productivity in wheel production plant, International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology (IRJET), 2(3) , 2015.
[4] N. Bagdiya, and S. Sawant, Reducing Defects in RCC Member by using Six Sigma Principle, International
Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(2), 2016.
[5] M. White, J.L. Garcia, J.A. Hernandez, and J. Meza, Cycle time improvement by a six sigma project for the
increase of new business accounts, International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16(3), 2009 ,191-205.
[6] S. Bodke, S. Nikam , Y. Phad, S. Katkade, and K. Kangane , Quality Improvement in Building Construction
Using Six Sigma , IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering , e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-
334X, ,2017, 01-05.
331 | P a g e