Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LTI Curric Version 4.2
LTI Curric Version 4.2
Curriculum Guide
LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf
4/20/09
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Welcome letter 3
Opening 5
Welcome
Agenda
Agreements
Introductions 12
Quote Matching 14
True/False 17
Role Play 21
Closing 27
Evaluation
Sign-in Sheet
The dialogues encourage thoughtful reflection and questioning, with a focus on “illegal”
immigrants. While we utilize fact-based information, including data from the Fiscal
Policy Institute’s 2008 report Working for a Better Life: A Profile of Immigrants in the
New York State Economy, we also recognize that each person’s individual experience
contains knowledge and wisdom that he or she knows best. Listening and sharing
together – the good, the bad and the ambiguous – can make a difference. The most
convincing conclusions are the ones individuals arrive at on their own. We hope this
dialogue is one in a series of events and conversations that your community holds about
immigration. It is part of a journey to align your moral commitments with creative and
effective actions.
At its best, this experience will yield new conversation partners as well as some skills
and strategies for pursuing a constructive dialogue on a divisive issue. We are willing to
work with you in having a dialogue. Based on your preferences and logistics, one of us
can co-facilitate with you or assist in planning, support and debriefing the dialogue.
We recommend that you co-facilitate the workshop with a partner. We hope this curriculum will make
the process of co-facilitating a dialogue easier.
This curriculum features a series of interactive activities. Although there are specific exercises and
instructions, the infusion of your personality and spontaneity will bring the curriculum to life.
Facilitators must tweak, adjust, stretch and amend the curriculum to fit their personality, their areas of
strength, their audience, and the time constraints. We assume 90 minutes, if one uses all the
components. Please pay special attention to the opening and closing because they set the tone and often
define a participant’s experience.
Be aware that these exercises presume participants are comfortable reading and writing in English.
Please alter the exercises to make the material more accessible to everyone. For example, when
working in teams, designate one person to read the questions out loud and/or write the answers.
Alternatively, the facilitators can conduct all of the exercises directly and deliver the material orally.
The exercises are on separate pages and written in a different font to make them easy to photocopy and
hand out. You may also choose to copy some of the information onto butcher block paper. Each
exercise has its own closing, however brief, so participants can share their experiences with a partner
or with the entire group. You can do one, some or all of the exercises as you see fit.
Be sure to introduce each exercise and give a sense of its goal. We have suggested some introductory
language at the start of each exercise. Also, be sure to wrap-up each exercise before moving on to the
next one. Be careful. Long wrap-ups and discussions can be meaningful but won’t allow time for all
aspects of the curriculum. Without the Role Play, the entire 90 minutes can be filled with people
sharing experiences and after the True/False exercise, asking and responding to each others questions
about immigration.
Because people have feelings and reactions to an exercise, to wrap up exercises, consider formats such
as,
- Partner sharing – Ask participants to turn to person next to them and each take a minute to
share their reaction to the exercise. After 60 seconds, say “Switch.”
- With or without partner share, ask for 1 or 2 shares from the audience. Usually a “What did you
learn from this exercise?”
OPENING 15 minutes
A good opening gives a clear beginning, sets the tone and establishes safety. Our opening has three
elements: Welcome; Review the Agenda; Review the Agreements/Ground Rules. The order can vary
but each component should be covered. Together this constitutes a warm-up that transitions
participants to fully being present to the activities to come.
Welcome/Call to Order
o Introduction by key person who organized the event or similar person from the
institution
o Welcome Prayer, chants or whatever is standard for the organization/occasion
o Why this event, acknowledge support, introduce the facilitators
o Facilitators’ Self-introductions
! Do plan what you will say about yourself but keep it brief and to what is most
relevant for this event
! Mention that participant introductions will occur after the “What Generation Are
You?” exercise
Review the Agenda
o The list of agenda items is on the next page
o Inform participants how long each segment might take
o Inform participants when there will be breaks, if any
o Review logistics – bathroom location, if/how breaks will be handled, coffee/water
location, end of session expectations, if any (returning chairs and tables to closets, etc.)
- Agreements (often called Ground Rules)
Agenda
Welcome
Agreements
Introductions
Quote Matching
True/False
Role Play
AGREEMENTS
2. Allow the facilitators to call on you before you speak. Avoid side
conversations when others are speaking.
3. OK to pass/skip a turn
4. Step Back/Step Up
5. Speak honestly and respectfully and about your own experience: Say
“I believe,” “I feel,” instead of “immigrants believe”
7. Respect confidentiality
Agreements
You may wish to alter this initial list of agreements to avoid pitfalls from habitual behavior patterns of
your group. If you change the list, try to keep the list short and focused on the most important items so
participants aren’t overwhelmed with rules.
TIME SAVER
- Do NOT read each item aloud. Instead allow everyone to read on their own. Ask if there are
any questions and respond to questions only, keeping explanations brief.
6. Respect each person’s process. No fixing, no saving, no advising, no setting each other
straight.
o This is likely the MOST IMPORTANT of the agreements. It affects the tone and level
of safety in the group. Facilitators must honor this agreement. We are learning together
[email protected] LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf 4/20/09
9
and providing food for thought so people can learn on their own. We aren’t here to
correct and discipline each other. We need to have a space where we can take risks and
be respected. We are creating a space that is unlike the typical conversations one
normally has.
7. Respect confidentiality
o Don’t share personal experiences shared in the workshop with others. Communicate
your own experience. Don’t use attendees names.
Be sure to ask:
- any questions or concerns?
- any requests for changes or additions?
ii. Suggest they answer the question in terms of the relationships and experiences
most important to them.
iii. Suggest they identify migration within the US, such as from the South or the
West Coast or from New York City, or from Rochester to Albany
Depending on the size of the group and their relationship to each other, amend the exercise.
To Shorten:
- Instead of people finding each other, have participants work with those next to them to answer
some of the questions.
- Instead of each person saying their generation, ask for a show of hands by generation, this way
everyone can see how many of each generation is present
- Instead of each person saying their country(ies) of ancestry, ask for a show of hands by region
(Europe; Asia; Latin America and the Caribbean; Africa; Pacific Islands; North America i.e.
Canada and the US)
- Take only 2 shares in response to the question “What was it like to meet people in this way?”
[email protected] LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf 4/20/09
12
To Lengthen: Discuss reasons for migration. Consider how normal migration is for us. How many in
the audience migrated to their current city of residence? How many times have they moved in their
lives and why? Migration is a fundamental part of the human experience. A move from Rochester to
Albany can be a big deal but a move from Uzbekistan to Albany is usually a bigger deal. But the
reasons for leaving Uzbekistan can be similar to the reasons for leaving Rochester – family, economic
opportunity, etc.
INTRODUCTIONS 5 minutes
Ask each person to say their name and the affiliation most relevant to this dialogue (job, residency,
congregation, or union, etc.). For large groups (25 or more), ask each person to state their name and
affiliation the first time that they speak/answer a question from this point on.
Goal: Demonstrate the continuities in how immigrants are received throughout history
Introduction
We like to say that we are a “nation of immigrants.” But when immigrants show up on our doorstep,
they don’t always receive a warm welcome. The following quotes are from different periods of time in
our history. Can you match the quote with the group it refers to?
B-3 “[With the current wave of immigrants from Mexico, Latin America and the Caribbean],
[w]e are committing cultural suicide. The barbarians at the gate will only need to give us a slight
push, and the emancipated body of Western Civilization will collapse in a heap.” 2006. US
Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO, 1999-present). (See In Mortal Danger: The Battle for
America’s Border and Security. Tancredo is the author of this book).
C-1 “Italians are a riffraff of desperate scoundrels, ex-convicts, and jailbirds.” 1908. NYC Police
Commissioner Theodore A. Bingham. (See “Foreign Criminals in New York” North American
Review August/September. Bingham authored the article.)
D-4 “[The Irish are nothing but] “imported beggars” and “animals”, “a mongrel mass of
ignorance and crime and superstition, as utterly unfit for society’s duties as they are for the
common courtesies and decencies of civilized life.” September 20 1859. Editorial, American
Standard (Jersey City). (Quoted in Herbert Gutman, “Work, Culture, and Society in
Industrializing America, 1815-1919” in The American Historical Review, Vol. 78, No. 3, June
1973, pages 584-585. This newspaper was also anti-abolition).
QUOTE MATCHING
Match the quote with the immigrant group the speaker is describing.
A-2 “Russians, Hungarians, Poles, Bohemians, Italian, Greeks, and even Asiatics
…[threaten] nothing less than the possibility of a great and perilous change in the
very fabric of our [Anglo-Saxon] race. . . . If a lower race mixes with a higher in
sufficient numbers, history teaches us that the lower race will prevail.” 1909. US
Senator Henry Cabot Lodge (R-MA, 1893-1924). (See “The Restriction of
Immigration” (1909) in Speeches and Addresses, 1884-1909. Lodge authored the
essay).
B-3 “[With the current wave of immigrants from Mexico, Latin America and the
Caribbean], [w]e are committing cultural suicide. The barbarians at the gate will only
need to give us a slight push, and the emancipated body of Western Civilization will
collapse in a heap.” 2006. US Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO, 1999-present).
(See In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and Security. Tancredo is
the author of this book).
D-4 “[The Irish are nothing but] “imported beggars” and “animals”, “a mongrel mass
of ignorance and crime and superstition, as utterly unfit for society’s duties as they
are for the common courtesies and decencies of civilized life.” September 20 1859.
Editorial, American Standard (Jersey City). (Quoted in Herbert Gutman, “Work,
Culture, and Society in Industrializing America, 1815-1919” in The American
Historical Review, Vol. 78, No. 3, June 1973,pages 584-585).
“Let’s Talk Immigration” is a collaborative project of ARISE Civil Rights of Immigrants Task Force, the Albany/Capital District
Chapter of the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement (LCLAA), and the Labor-Religion Coalition of the Capital District in
affiliation with the “Truth About Immigrants” campaign of the New York Immigration Coalition.
For more info, email [email protected] or leave a message for us at 518/482-5595
TRUE/FALSE 5 - 10 minutes
Goal
To share key facts about “illegal” immigrants
Introduction of exercise
We may all move and migrate but not all migration experiences are the same. Today’s debate about
immigration emphasizes whether one is in the country legally or illegally, whether one’s presence is
authorized or unauthorized by the federal government. But do you know all the facts about those here
“without papers”?
TRUE OR FALSE
Find the TWO FALSE statements
1. The IRS recently determined that between 1996 and 2003 undocumented workers
paid $50 billion in federal taxes.
2. The Social Security Administration estimates that the undocumented pay $8.5 billion
in Social Security and Medicare taxes annually.
5. The RAND Corporation recently concluded that health care spending for the
undocumented is two-tenths of one percent (0.02%) of all spending by federal, state,
and local governments, roughly $1.1 billion dollars annually.
6. According to the official 9-11 Commission Report, one of the nineteen 9-11 hijackers
entered the U.S. illegally by crossing the U.S.-Mexican border.
7. The Center for an Urban Future found that New York City’s immigrant neighborhoods,
like Flushing, Sunset Park, and Elmhurst, exhibit above average growth in jobs and
new businesses.
8. Even Harvard economist George Borjas, a critic of immigration, found that over the
past 15 years society gained economically from immigration, but those with less than a
high school education experienced a 5% wage decline.
10. According to the Public Policy Institute of California, U.S.- born men ages 18-40 are
eight times more likely to end up in prison than Mexican-born men who entered the
U.S. illegally.
1. The IRS recently determined that between 1996 and 2003 undocumented workers paid $50 billion
in federal taxes. (Statement of the Honorable Mark W. Everson, Commissioner, Internal
Revenue Service, Testimony Before the House Committee on Ways and Means, July 26,
2006.)
2. The Social Security Administration estimates that the undocumented pay $8.5 billion in Social
Security and Medicare taxes annually. (Steve Goss, Social Security Administration’s Chief
Actuary, quoted in “Illegal Immigrants are Bolstering Social Security with Billions,” New York
Times, April 5, 2005.)
3. The National Academy of Sciences estimated in 1997 that if immigration patterns remained
constant, Social Security will benefit by an additional $500 billion in contributions by 2022. (in
The New Americans: Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Effects of Immigration, 1997).
4. According to the Urban Institute, the workforce participation rate of undocumented immigrants
is 96%, exceeding the rates of both legal immigrants and U.S. citizens. (“Undocumented
Immigrants: Facts and Figures” 2004, www.urban.org)
5. The RAND Corporation recently concluded that health care spending for the undocumented is
two-tenths of one percent (0.02%) of all spending by federal, state, and local governments,
roughly $1.1 billion dollars annually. (“Immigrants and the Cost of Medical Care,” Health
Affairs Volume 25 Number 6, November 2006, www.rand.org)
6. FALSE. According to the official 9-11 Commission Report, one of the nineteen 9-11
hijackers entered the U.S. illegally by crossing the U.S.-Mexican border. 17 were
admitted on six-month tourist visas, one had a student visa for two years and one had a
20 day visa. (see http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm and link to Staff
Statement No 1.)
7. The Center for an Urban Future found that New York City’s immigrant neighborhoods, like
Flushing, Sunset Park, and Elmhurst, exhibit above average growth in jobs and new businesses.
(Transcript of forum “Restarting NYC’s Economic Engine: Tapping the Economic Potential of
the City’s Immigrant Entrepreneurs” March 11, 2004).
8. Even Harvard economist George Borjas, a critic of immigration, found that over
the past 15 years society gained economically from immigration, but those with
less than a high school education experienced a 5% wage decline. (“Working for a
Better Life: A Profile of Immigrants in the New York State Economy,” Fiscal
Policy Institute 2008, page 102 note 12).
9. FALSE. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, an influx of
undocumented immigrants from Mexico led to 7,000 new cases of leprosy. (despite being
said on CNN’s Lou Dobbs show --http://www.splcenter.org/news/item.jsp?aid=254)
10. According to the Public Policy Institute of California, U.S.- born men ages 18-40 are eight times
more likely to end up in prison than Mexican-born men who entered the U.S. illegally. (K.F.
Butcher, A. M. Piehl, “Crime, Corrections, and California: What does immigration have to do
with it?” Volume 9 Number 3, www.ppic.org)
Goal
Through role plays, participants can articulate the full range of perspectives they hear and feel about
immigrants in a non-judgmental atmosphere. They can also strategize about the types of skills and
approaches needed to engage colleagues in a discussion about immigration. A role play is an excellent
vehicle for participants to share difficult, even hateful, points of view without identifying personally
with that viewpoint. It is critical that all perspectives are heard and considered without creating tension
and personal attacks. Our aim is dialogue, not the defense of individual positions on an issue. From
the National Coalition on Dialogue and Deliberation:
Dialogue is a process that allows people, usually in small groups, to share their perspectives and
experiences with one another about difficult issues we tend to just debate about or avoid entirely.
Dialogue is not about winning an argument or coming to an agreement, but about understanding and
learning. Dialogue dispels stereotypes, builds trust and enables people to be open to perspectives that
are very different from their own. Dialogue can, and often does, lead to both personal and collaborative
action. (http://www.thataway.org/?page_id=713)
Preparation
- have enough paper and pen/markers for all teams
- ensure there is a space where the For and Against teams can convene away from the
Undecideds
- 3x5 notecards for the questions the Undecided teams create
- write the Resolution on the poster for all to see
- manage the “membership meeting” to maximize the time given to the questions the members
have
ii. The majority of the group will function as the “Undecided” members. They
stay in the room to develop questions. If there is a large group, break them into
smaller groups.
1. Make sure every group has paper, notecards and markers/pens.
2. One question per note card
3. Brainstorm as many questions as they can
4. They should decide the questions they wish to ask first, second, etc.
4. Facilitator calls the meeting to order and chairs it no group unfairly dominates and that
the members’ questions are heard and addressed. (10-15 minutes)
i. Bring the For/Against teams to the front of the room.
ii. Announce that a motion to discuss the Resolution has been made and seconded
by two of the participants playing pro-resolution members. In order to speak
people must raise their hands to be recognized. No Robert’s Rules of Order nor
any fancy procedural tactics will be used.
iii. Immediately take questions from the membership giving each team an
opportunity to respond. Before the vote, each team will make a closing
statement. (More traditionally, each team makes a one-minute opening
statement, then take questions from the membership.)
5. End the meeting by asking the Membership to vote on the Resolution (yea; nay;
abstentions). (1 minute)
RESOLUTION:
Be it resolved that the Local Building Maintenance and Custodial Workers Union
supports our community Workers Rights Center, an organization advocating on
behalf of immigrant workers, by
Joining the Executive Board of the Workers Rights Center, and committing to:
a. the local union president appoints a union representative to attend monthly
Workers Center board meetings;
b. the local union contributes $5,000 annually to the Workers Center.
Undecided: Most members of the Local have not decided what is in Local’s best
interests and also reflects members’ views.
For: The recently elected Local President supports an aggressive organizing campaign of
non-union worksites where Latin America immigrants, authorized and unauthorized,
dominate. He believes the local should develop ties to local immigrant organizations and
openly advocate on behalf of undocumented immigrants. His supporters thinks this
makes moral and strategic sense and fits the AFL-CIO’s position on immigrant workers.
• “The AFL-CIO proudly stands on the side of immigrant workers. Immigrant workers are an
extremely important part of our nation’s economy, our nation’s union movement and our nation’s
communities. In many ways, the new AFL-CIO immigration policy signals a return of the union
movement to its historical roots. The AFL-CIO supports legalization with a path to citizenship and
political equality. Bringing unauthorized workers out of the shadows protects the rights of all
workers.” (from: www.aflcio.org/issues/civilrights/immigration)
Against: The recently elected Local Vice President supports calling Immigration and
Custom Enforcement (ICE) to conduct a workplace raid whenever foreign-born workers
are seen at a non-union worksite. His supporters strongly object to anything that would
aid and abet “illegals.” They believe the local should serve its current members.
• “Federation for American Immigration Reform seeks to improve border security, to stop illegal
immigration, and to promote immigration levels consistent with the national interest. With more
than a million legal and illegal immigrants settling in the United States each year, immigration has
an impact on education, health care, government budgets, employment, the environment, crime and
countless other areas of American life.“ (from: www.fairus.org)
RESOLVED: This Congregation empowers its Governing Board to join the local
New Sanctuary Movement (NSM) chapter, an organization that supports the human
rights and dignity of undocumented immigrants facing detention and deportation.
• The Board will appoint a representative to serve as a liaison who will attend NSM
meetings and give regular reports back to the congregation
• make an annual contribution of at least $500 to the NSM chapter
• give material support in the form of additional funds, food, clothing or shelter to
families facing deportation
For: The Minister supports a human rights stance and wishes to serve the
congregation’s growing Latino membership. He and his supporters believe it makes moral
and strategic sense to support the Interfaith Platform on Humane Immigration Reform.
• As our diverse faith traditions teach us to welcome our brothers and sisters with love and
compassion— regardless of their place of birth…. We see the exploitation of undocumented
workers and the plight of separated families, as well as the escalation of community fear due to
indiscriminate raids and local police acting as federal immigration agents. [We must help to]put an
end to this suffering, which offends the dignity of all human beings. In the New Testament,
Jesus tells us to welcome the stranger, for "what you do to the least of my brethren, you do unto
me” (Matthew 25:40). (http://www.interfaithimmigration.org/index.php)
Against: The chair of the Governing Board supports assisting individual members of the
congregation who need housing, food or other humanitarian aid. He and his supporters do
not want the congregation to take an official position on immigration and do not want any
involvement in the legal problems of their members. They support the Secure Borders
Coalition.
• We favor a policy of attrition of the illegal population through strong enforcement of our nation's
immigration laws, which includes, first and foremost, the securing of our borders. We’re sick and
tired of…[those] willing to reward criminality, sell out our sovereignty and surrender our national
identity…. The Christian thing to do is to "erect a fence and double our border agents in order to
stop the drugs, the smuggling racket, the diseases, and the crimes" says Phyllis Schlafly of the
Eagle Forum. "…[T]he American people are backed up by the Bible in their demands that America's
national boundaries are to be respected," writes Roberta Combs, national president of the
Christian Coalition. (http://secureborderscoalition.com/ and “Christian Nativism” at
www.splcenter.org)
Undecided: Most members have not decided whether the resolution is in the
congregation’s legal and financial interests as well as reflecting the congregation’s moral
values.
(updated 2/28/09)
[email protected] LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf 4/20/09
26
! They provide the U.S. economy with workers who do work no one else wants.
! They’re just trying to provide for their families like anyone else.
! Let’s document them, provide a path to citizenship, and get them the benefits due
them.
! Once documented they will no longer be part of the underground economy and
society, and they will start paying payroll taxes like anyone else to benefit them
later in life.
! It’s a Human Rights issue, not an illegal alien issue. They deserve better.
! Documenting them will restore their self dignity, self esteem, and bring them out
of the shadows, allowing them to participate in the local political economy.
! Documentation will provide their children with a sound education, which will
benefit all of society.
! There will be less demand for a gang culture with documentation.
! Documentation will keep the family together rather than tearing it apart.
! Immigrants bring a rich resource of talents to the American workplace.
! Diversity of human culture enriches all of us.
- Thank yous
o Be sure to thank your hosts and those who assisted in organizing the event
- oral evaluation (skip this to shorten)
o draw two columns on the board. One is the plus side, the other is suggestions for
changes (avoid writing a minus sign, a triangle is a sign for changes)
- Distribute Evaluations and Attendance sheets
- Clean up
Be sure to meet with your co-facilitator (and any others) to discuss the session in more depth. You
should have reviewed and summarized the evaluations before this meeting. What are next steps for
your community?
EVALUATION
What will you take away with you as a result of participating in today’s
dialogue?
In the next section, please refer to any of the workshop components, such
as
• Agreements;
• What Immigrant Generation Are You?;
• Quote Matching;
• True/False;
• Role Play.
Name:
Address:
Name of Organization:
Your Phone #:
Email:
LET’S TALK IMMIGRATION! is a collaborative project of ARISE Civil Rights of Immigrants Task Force, the
Albany/Capital District Chapter of the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement (LCLAA), and the
Labor-Religion Coalition of the Capital District in affiliation with the “Truth About Immigrants” campaign of
the New York Immigration Coalition.
LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf
4/20/09
2
Agenda
Introductions
Quote Matching
True/False
Role Play
AGREEMENTS
2. Allow the facilitators to call on you before you speak. Avoid side
conversations when others are speaking.
3. OK to pass/skip a turn
4. Step Back/Step Up
5. Speak honestly and respectfully and about your own experience: Say
“I believe,” “I feel,” instead of “immigrants believe”
7. Respect confidentiality
QUOTE MATCHING
Match the quote with the immigrant group the speaker is describing.
TRUE OR FALSE
Find the TWO FALSE statements
1. The IRS recently determined that between 1996 and 2003 undocumented workers
paid $50 billion in federal taxes.
2. The Social Security Administration estimates that the undocumented pay $8.5 billion
in Social Security and Medicare taxes annually.
5. The RAND Corporation recently concluded that health care spending for the
undocumented is two-tenths of one percent (0.02%) of all spending by federal, state,
and local governments, roughly $1.1 billion dollars annually.
6. According to the official 9-11 Commission Report, one of the nineteen 9-11 hijackers
entered the U.S. illegally by crossing the U.S.-Mexican border.
7. The Center for an Urban Future found that New York City’s immigrant neighborhoods,
like Flushing, Sunset Park, and Elmhurst, exhibit above average growth in jobs and
new businesses.
8. Even Harvard economist George Borjas, a critic of immigration, found that over the
past 15 years society gained economically from immigration, but those with less than a
high school education experienced a 5% wage decline.
10. According to the Public Policy Institute of California, U.S.- born men ages 18-40 are
eight times more likely to end up in prison than Mexican-born men who entered the
U.S. illegally.
A-2 “Russians, Hungarians, Poles, Bohemians, Italian, Greeks, and even Asiatics
…[threaten] nothing less than the possibility of a great and perilous change in the
very fabric of our [Anglo-Saxon] race. . . . If a lower race mixes with a higher in
sufficient numbers, history teaches us that the lower race will prevail.” 1909. US
Senator Henry Cabot Lodge (R-MA, 1893-1924). (See “The Restriction of
Immigration” (1909) in Speeches and Addresses, 1884-1909. Lodge authored the
essay).
B-3 “[With the current wave of immigrants from Mexico, Latin America and the
Caribbean], [w]e are committing cultural suicide. The barbarians at the gate will only
need to give us a slight push, and the emancipated body of Western Civilization will
collapse in a heap.” 2006. US Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO, 1999-present).
(See In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and Security. Tancredo is
the author of this book).
D-4 “[The Irish are nothing but] “imported beggars” and “animals”, “a mongrel mass
of ignorance and crime and superstition, as utterly unfit for society’s duties as they
are for the common courtesies and decencies of civilized life.” September 20 1859.
Editorial, American Standard (Jersey City). (Quoted in Herbert Gutman, “Work,
Culture, and Society in Industrializing America, 1815-1919” in The American
Historical Review, Vol. 78, No. 3, June 1973, pages 584-585. This newspaper was also
anti-abolition).
“Let’s Talk Immigration” is a collaborative project of ARISE Civil Rights of Immigrants Task Force, the Albany/Capital District
Chapter of the Labor Council for Latin American Advancement (LCLAA), and the Labor-Religion Coalition of the Capital District in
affiliation with the “Truth About Immigrants” campaign of the New York Immigration Coalition.
For more info, email [email protected] or leave a message for us at 518/482-5595
RESOLUTION:
Be it resolved that the Local Building Maintenance and Custodial Workers Union
supports our community Workers Rights Center, an organization advocating on
behalf of immigrant workers, by
Joining the Executive Board of the Workers Rights Center, and committing to:
c. the local union president appoints a union representative to attend monthly
Workers Center board meetings;
d. the local union contributes $5,000 annually to the Workers Center.
Undecided: Most members of the Local have not decided what is in Local’s best
interests and also reflects members’ views.
For: The recently elected Local President supports an aggressive organizing campaign of
non-union worksites where Latin America immigrants, authorized and unauthorized,
dominate. He believes the local should develop ties to local immigrant organizations and
openly advocate on behalf of undocumented immigrants. His supporters thinks this
makes moral and strategic sense and fits the AFL-CIO’s position on immigrant workers.
• “The AFL-CIO proudly stands on the side of immigrant workers. Immigrant workers are an
extremely important part of our nation’s economy, our nation’s union movement and our nation’s
communities. In many ways, the new AFL-CIO immigration policy signals a return of the union
movement to its historical roots. The AFL-CIO supports legalization with a path to citizenship and
political equality. Bringing unauthorized workers out of the shadows protects the rights of all
workers.” (from: www.aflcio.org/issues/civilrights/immigration)
Against: The recently elected Local Vice President supports calling Immigration and
Custom Enforcement (ICE) to conduct a workplace raid whenever foreign-born workers
are seen at a non-union worksite. His supporters strongly object to anything that would
aid and abet “illegals.” They believe the local should serve its current members.
• “Federation for American Immigration Reform seeks to improve border security, to stop illegal
immigration, and to promote immigration levels consistent with the national interest. With more
than a million legal and illegal immigrants settling in the United States each year, immigration has
an impact on education, health care, government budgets, employment, the environment, crime and
countless other areas of American life.“ (from: www.fairus.org)
RESOLVED: This Congregation empowers its Governing Board to join the local
New Sanctuary Movement (NSM) chapter, an organization that supports the human
rights and dignity of undocumented immigrants facing detention and deportation.
• The Board will appoint a representative to serve as a liaison who will attend NSM
meetings and give regular reports back to the congregation
• make an annual contribution of at least $500 to the NSM chapter
• give material support in the form of additional funds, food, clothing or shelter to
families facing deportation
For: The Minister supports a human rights stance and wishes to serve the
congregation’s growing Latino membership. He and his supporters believe it makes moral
and strategic sense to support the Interfaith Platform on Humane Immigration Reform.
• As our diverse faith traditions teach us to welcome our brothers and sisters with love and
compassion— regardless of their place of birth…. We see the exploitation of undocumented
workers and the plight of separated families, as well as the escalation of community fear due to
indiscriminate raids and local police acting as federal immigration agents. [We must help to]put an
end to this suffering, which offends the dignity of all human beings. In the New Testament,
Jesus tells us to welcome the stranger, for "what you do to the least of my brethren, you do unto
me” (Matthew 25:40). (http://www.interfaithimmigration.org/index.php)
Against: The chair of the Governing Board supports assisting individual members of the
congregation who need housing, food or other humanitarian aid. He and his supporters do
not want the congregation to take an official position on immigration and do not want any
involvement in the legal problems of their members. They support the Secure Borders
Coalition.
• We favor a policy of attrition of the illegal population through strong enforcement of our nation's
immigration laws, which includes, first and foremost, the securing of our borders. We’re sick and
tired of…[those] willing to reward criminality, sell out our sovereignty and surrender our national
identity…. The Christian thing to do is to "erect a fence and double our border agents in order to
stop the drugs, the smuggling racket, the diseases, and the crimes" says Phyllis Schlafly of the
Eagle Forum. "…[T]he American people are backed up by the Bible in their demands that America's
national boundaries are to be respected," writes Roberta Combs, national president of the
Christian Coalition. (http://secureborderscoalition.com/ and “Christian Nativism” at
www.splcenter.org)
Undecided: Most members have not decided whether the resolution is in the
congregation’s legal and financial interests as well as reflecting the congregation’s moral
values.
(updated 2/28/09)
[email protected] LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf 4/20/09
13
EVALUATION
What will you take away with you as a result of participating in today’s
dialogue?
In the next section, please refer to any of the workshop components, such
as
• Agreements;
• What Immigrant Generation Are You?;
• Quote Matching;
• True/False;
• Role Play.
Name:
Address:
Name of Organization:
Your Phone #:
Email:
LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf
4/20/09
LTI_Curric_Version_4.2rtf
4/20/09