Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nakpil V Valdez Digest
Nakpil V Valdez Digest
Complainant sought to recover Moran property by filing with the them CFI Baguio an action HELD/RATIO2:
for reconveyance with damages. During the pendencey of the action for reconveyance, General Rule: An attorney cannot represent adverse interests.
complainant filed this administrative case to disbar the respondent. Exception: Representation of conflicting interests may be allowed where the parties consent
to the representation, after full disclosure of the facts. Disclosure alone is not enough for the
Allegations of complainant: clients must give their informed consent to such representation. The lawyer must explain to
Respondent maliciously appropriated the property in trust knowing that it did not his clients the nature and extent of conflict and possible adverse effect must be thoroughly
belong to him understood by his clients.
Respondent’s auditing firm excluded the Moran property from the inventory YET
included the Moran property in the claims against the estate the amounts P65k and In the present case, there is no question that the interests of the estate and that of its
P75k which respondent represented as complainant’s husband’s loans applied creditors are adverse to each other.
“probably for the purchase of a house and lot in Moran”
Conflict of interest- Respondent’s law firm filed the petition for the settlement of her Respondent denied that he represented complainant in the intestate proceedings.
husband’s estate in court, while respondent’s auditing firm acted as accountant of He points out that it was one Atty Percival Cendana, who filed the case in court.
both the estate and two of its creditors. However, that is beside the point. Respondent acted as counsel and accountant of
complainant after the death of Jose Nakpil.
CFI dismissed the action for reconveyance
CA reversed the trial court. Respondent was the absolute owner of the Moran property. When he transferred the Moran property to his corporation, the intestate
proceedings was still pending in court.
His defense that complainant knew that his law firm was legal counsel of the estate 1. If the acceptance of the new retainer will require the attorney to do anything
and that his accounting form was the auditor of both the estate and the two which will injuriously affect his first client in any matter in which he represents him
and also whether he will be called upon in his new relation, to use against his first
claimants against it was not taken by the Court. There is nothing in the records to
client any knowledge acquired thru their connection;
show that respondent or his law firm explained the legal situation and its
consequences to complainant. 2. Whether the acceptance of a new relation will prevent an attorney from full
discharge of his duty of undivided fidelity and loyalty to his client or invite suspicion
Respondent is a CPA-lawyer actively participating in both professions. He is the senior of unfaithfulness or double dealing in the performance thereof.
partner in his law and accounting firms. Complainant is not charging respondent with breach
of ethics for being the common accountant of the estate and the two creditors. He is charged
for allowing his accounting firm to represent two creditors of the estate, and at the same time
allowing his law firm to represent the estate in the proceedings where these claims were Reason for prohibition
presented.
The reason for the prohibition is found in the relation of attorney and client, which is
one of trust and confidence of the highest degree. A lawyer becomes familiar with all
DISPO: Suspended from the practice of law for ONE YEAR.
the facts connected with his client’s case. He learns from his client the weak points
of the action as well as the strong ones. Such knowledge must be considered sacred
and guarded with care. No opportunity must be given him to take advantage of his
Nakpil vs. Atty. Carlos J. Valdes client’s secrets. A lawyer must have the fullest confidence of his client. For, if the
confidence is abused, the profession will suffer by the loss thereof.
March 4, 1998
The prohibition applies however slight such adverse interest may be (Nakpil vs.
A lawyer violated the trust and confidence of the client when he represented Valdes, 286 SCRA 758).
conflicting interest. He represented the creditors when his accounting firm prepared
and computed the claims of the creditors while his law firm represented the estate. The essence of the rule is to maintain inviolate the client’s confidence or to refrain
from obtaining anything which will injuriously affect in any matter in which he
Case references: previously represented him.
Conflict of interest
A lawyer has to disclose to his client all the circumstances of his relations to the
parties in connection with the controversy which might influence the client in the
selection of counsel.