Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

SAQ Historical Argumentation: Declaration

A. The main argument from Bernard Bailyn is that the British were conspiring to take away
American liberties. In the excerpt, he describes how the Stamp Act and the Coercive Acts were
put in place to limit colonists’ freedoms in America and that England was attempting to enslave
the colonists. The historian supports the argument because he describes Britain as “evil” and that
if the Americans wanted freedom and liberty then they must protect themselves against England.

B. Howard Zinn’s main argument is that the Declaration of Independence was written to rally all
colonial social classes to band together against Britain. He describes how the declaration was
written in a language that all people could understand so that it would inspire them to unite
against Britain. He also talks about how the Declaration of Independence was specific enough to
stir up anger and resentment in the colonists against Britain yet vague enough so as to not create
conflict amongst the different social classes. The historian supports the argument because he says
that even American who had problems and conflicts with each other put aside their differences in
order to unite and fight for a common goal which was Independence from England.

C. One event or idea from 1763-1783 that supports the argument described in part A is the
creation of the Continental Congress. The continental congress was created by colonists who
wanted to redress grievances against Britain. Members of this congress eventually came to create
the Articles of Confederation which was put in place to establish that the Americans had rights
that Britain could not take away or ignore.

You might also like