Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Digestibility Evaluation of Fish Meal, Rice Bran, Soya Bean Meal, Pollard On Ongole Cross Breed Cattle and Frisien Holstein Cross Breed
Digestibility Evaluation of Fish Meal, Rice Bran, Soya Bean Meal, Pollard On Ongole Cross Breed Cattle and Frisien Holstein Cross Breed
2
p-ISSN 2598-2915 Edisi September 2018
e-ISSN 2598-2907
Digestibility Evaluation of Fish Meal, Rice Bran, Soya Bean Meal, Pollard on Ongole
Cross Breed Cattle and Frisien Holstein Cross Breed
1)*) 2) 3)
Muhammad Askari Zakariah , Ristianto Utomo , Subur Priyono Sasmitho Budhi
1)
IAI Al-Mawaddah Warrahmah Kolaka
2),3)
Faculty of Animal Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada
Abstract
The objective this study was to evaluate feed stuff such as fish meal, rice bran, soya bean
meal, and wheat pollard on Ongola and Frisien Holsten breed. Each feed stuff was replicated in 3
replication. Variable were observed in vivo, in sacco, and in vitro digestibility. Collected data were
analyzed by independent t-test sample. Result showed dry matter and organic matter in vitro
digestibility of soya bean meal on Ongole crossbreed cattle has lower than Frisien Holstein
crossbreed cattle (84.54±1.15 vs 90.17±1.34, 82.53±1.20 vs 89.05±0.76) respectively, and for another
feedstud were used on this research not showed significant. Degradation theory of some feed stuff on
Ongole crossbreed cattle has lower than Frisien Holstein crossbreed cattle. Coeficient of digestibility
on Ongole crossbreed cattle has lower than Frisien Holstein crossbreed cattle. Concluded that
concentrate such as fish meal, soya bean meal, rice bran and pollard has digestibility on ongole
crossbreed cattle lower than Frisien Holstein crossbreed.
Keywords: Fish meal, Rice bran, Soya bean meal, Pollard, Ongole crossbreed cattle, and Frisien
Holstein crossbreed cattle
86
*) Corresponding author:
[email protected]
Journal of Livestock Science and Production Volume 2 No. 2
p-ISSN 2598-2915 Edisi September 2018
e-ISSN 2598-2907
and crossbreed Friesian Holstein cattle concentrate and then the bag was tied tip of
(PFH), fish meal, rice bran, soya bean meal, the bag.
and wheat pollard, rumen fluid PO cattle Nylon bags filled sample linked with
and PFH, grass pangola, warm water , a rope on a ring made of chrome plated iron,
artificial saliva or Mc. Dougall. then incubated in the rumen sebelun
morning feed is distributed. Number of
In vitro evaluation nylon bags per measurement point adapted
The samples used 250 mg. Utomo to the purpose of measurement, should be
(2010) has made modifications to the taken into account the possibility of
amount of use of the substrate, rumen fluid, individual variations and variations in the
artificial saliva, HCl and pepsin used in the incubation period. Samples were taken in
determination of digestibility in vitro, which accordance with the time of incubation,
is only 50% that direkomendasika More and immediately washed with cold tap water
Barnes. Rumen fluid is used as the donor of slowly before continuing washing using the
microbes taken using previously flask filled washing machine for 6 minutes and the
with water at a temperature of 39 ° C until it water flowing. If washing with a washing
is full. In the rumen fluid entering into the machine is not executed then the nylon
flask arranged so that outside air is not bags after incubation frozen at -15ºC.
much sign. Thermos containing rumen fluid Washing required to remove food particles
were taken to the laboratory, and or microbes that attach to the residue or
immediately used for donor microbes to be nylon pouch. Further drying at a
inoculated in the medium. Rumen fluid is temperature of 60 ° C for 48 hours and the
mixed with a solution of Mc. Dougall while residue was weighed and analyzed dry
CO2 gas fed to the mixing ratio of 1: 4 and matter (DM) and organic matter (BO).
measured the pH of about 6.7 to 7. After
that 25 ml of the mixture is placed in a test In vivo evaluation
tube filled sample and incubated earlier and Observation enclosure is cleaned of
incubated for 48 hours and shaken every 8 residual feed and feces, then the PO and
hours once. PFH cattle were weighed and counted the
Analysis of the samples will be required amount of feed (feed intake).
measured digestibility dry and organic Cattle given feed elephant grass
matter (Tilley and Terry, 1963). After (Pennisetum purpureum) were cut with a
incubation for 48 hours, filtered tubes one chopper and concentrate. Feed given as
by one through the crucible, which already much as 3% of body weight, while water
contains glasswool (which has been known provided ad libitum. Feed given between
to empty weight) and in vitro tube washed 08.00 to 09.00 and 15.00 to 16.00.
with hot water until no samples left behind. Collections were made during the in
Distillate test of dry matter and organic vivo analysis include collection of leftover
matter. food and feces. Food remains collected and
counted every day, and then take as much
In sacco evaluation as approximately 300 grams of a sample to
Bags/sacco made of nylon material be proximate analysis. Faeces issued
for rumen incubation. Pockets were collected and weighed every day, and this
incubated in the rumen has a porosity of 46 will be mixed with urine, then homogenized
stitched on three sides with plastic welding with a mixer (dikomposit). Faecal samples
with the dimensions of the 6 × 11 cm. taken as many as 100 grams of sample to
Seseuai nylon bag is marked with the be proximate analysis. How sampling feces
number of feed, incubation time and done by feces collected is weighed and
replication then roasted at a temperature of then taken 100 grams after it dried in the
55ºC for 1 hour and weighed empty weight. sun, after all the feces collected, the stool is
Nylon pouch for rumen incubation weighed inserted into a newspaper that has been
empty weight is filled with a sample to be weighed and then put in the oven 55 ° C
tested, 3 grams to 5 grams for forage and until the weight is constant then milled after
the analysis proximate. After analyzing the
87
Journal of Livestock Science and Production Volume 2 No. 2
p-ISSN 2598-2915 Edisi September 2018
e-ISSN 2598-2907
88
Journal of Livestock Science and Production Volume 2 No. 2
p-ISSN 2598-2915 Edisi September 2018
e-ISSN 2598-2907
Trend on table 2 and 3 showed that will lead to increased contacts between feed
DM degradability of fish meal and rice bran the rumen microbes. it will allow greater
on PO on top than PFH. However, in rumen microbial activity to degrade the feed.
contrary fact of its OM degradability on The linkage can both reduce the value of
PFH on top than PO. It could be explained the degradation rate of potentially
by fraction a on the table 4 about ruminal degradable fraction. Potential difference
fermentation of fish meal and rice bran. soluble fraction and the degradation rate of
Overall, degradability of feedstuff on ruminal potentially degradable fraction is affected by
PO more than PFH. Genetic factor to the nutrient composition of the feed. long
adapted a feed stuff in Indonesia, then live feed in the rumen and are also available
supported a microbial diversity PO might be substrate for microbial activity in degrading
diverse than PFH, expecially to cellulose the feed in the rumen. Rumen fermentation
microbes. kinetics data are presented in Table 4.
According to Hadi et al. (2011).
retention time in the rumen that the longer it
89
Journal of Livestock Science and Production Volume 2 No. 2
p-ISSN 2598-2915 Edisi September 2018
e-ISSN 2598-2907
Table 4. Ruminal fermentation kinetics ongole cross breed cattle and Frisien Holstein cross
breed cattle
Ongole cross breed Frisien Holstein cross breed
cattle cattle
Feed stuff Variabel
DM OM DM OM
a(%) 25.14 27.18 23.89 29.3
Fish meal b(%) 31.16 34.58 33.72 34.67
c (per
0.021 0.017 0.041 0.111
hours)
DT (%) 8.078 7.63 27.37 45.01
a+b(%) 56.3 61.76 57.61 63.97
a(%) 31.58 32.86 33.79 34.47
Rice bran b(%) 24.7 29.4 26.45 31.29
c (per
0.086 0.581 0.092 0.54
hours)
DT (%) 31.58 32.86 33.79 34.47
a+b(%) 56.28 62.26 60.24 65.76
a(%) 35.82 37.19 36.73 36.37
Pollard b(%) 40.5 38.16 39.48 39.91
c (per
0.232 0.195 0.197 0.201
hours)
DT (%) 35.82 37.19 36.73 36.37
a+b(%) 76.32 75.35 76.21 76.28
Soya bean a(%) 33.11 34.69 30.04 35.69
meal b(%) 59.31 49.54 58.45 52.93
c (per
0.189 0.109 0.183 1.195
hours)
DT (%) 33.11 34.69 30.04 35.69
a+b(%) 92.42 84.23 88.49 88.62
90
Journal of Livestock Science and Production Volume 2 No. 2
p-ISSN 2598-2915 Edisi September 2018
e-ISSN 2598-2907
influenced by the type of feed given (Siregar. can be obtained observation data and
1994). Anti-nutritive factors can affect the calculation Consumption Dry (BK). Organic
loss of organic matter. it is associated with Matter (BO). coefficient of digestibility
the reaction of anti-nutrients in inhibiting the Materials Dry (KcBK). coefficient of
metabolism of microorganisms in the digestibility of Organic Materials (KcBO). in
process of using a substrate. cattle crossbreed onggole (PO) and the
In vivo evaluation
Peranakan Holstein Frisian (PFH) is
Based on the results of experiments
presented in table 6.
that have been done on digestibility in vivo.
91
Journal of Livestock Science and Production Volume 2 No. 2
p-ISSN 2598-2915 Edisi September 2018
e-ISSN 2598-2907
92