Dari Grammar
Dari Grammar
Dari Grammar
Adam Baker
This is a preliminary draft—a ‘beta version’ if you like. The position that enabled me to work on this grammar
(more or less) full time is coming to an end, and I have decided to release what I have rather than wait for
the opportunity to complete it to my own satisfaction.1 Everything that I’ve included here is, to the best of
my knowledge, correct. There are, however, three chapters that I have left out entirely (addressing if-then
sentences, questions, and relative clauses), because I haven’t had time to address the topics properly.
Nevertheless, there are certain to be deficiencies in the chapters that I have included. I am very interested
in your feedback in matters small and large. In particular, I would value feeback in any of the following areas:
• Are there any example sentences you wish had been included?
• Are there any example sentences that are too complex, or difficult to figure out from the translations
alone?
• Are there places where I assume more knowledge of grammar than most people have?
• Particularly for non-native English speakers: are there any places where I assume knowledge of English
grammar that a non-native speaker wouldn’t have?
• Are you aware of any regional dialect variations that should be included?
• And of course: are there any mistakes?
You feedback for these or any other issues would be very much appreciated. You can get in touch with me
through IAM, or with the email address below.
Adam Baker
[email protected]
May 24, 2016
Hamidullah Muradi (Hamid) very generously checked the written and transcribed Dari, and found many errors.
I am grateful for his input. Those errors have been corrected in this edition.
Adam Baker
August 15, 2017
1 This is of course an easier decision in the 21st century, when ‘publishing’ means sending around a PDF file, rather than ordering
i
Contents
Abbreviations vi
1 Introduction 1
1.1 The Scope of this Book . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Variation in Dari . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.4 Dari as a literary language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.5 Indirect Communication . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.6 International Phonetic Alphabet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.7 Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.8 A few tips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.9 Linguistic disclaimers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.10 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2 Pronunciation 7
2.1 Vowels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2 Consonants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3 Stress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3.1 Everything except verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3.2 Verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.4 Tips for learning pronunciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
I Nouns 16
3 Nouns & Adjectives 17
3.1 Noun phrases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2 Singular and Plural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2.1 Other plural forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3 The Ezafa Marker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.4 Possession . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.4.1 Indicating actual ownership . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.5 New nouns and adjectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.5.1 Changing nouns to adjectives and vice versa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.5.2 Compound nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.5.3 The [ɛnda] suffix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.5.4 Other ways to form nouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4 Pronouns 25
4.1 Person . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
4.2 Personal Pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.2.1 Leaving out the pronoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4.3 The reflexive pronoun . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.4 Emphatic personal pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
4.5 Demonstrative Pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
4.5.1 Emphatic pronouns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
ii
CONTENTS iii
5 Numbers 30
5.1 The numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.1.1 Miscellaneous topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.2 Ordinal numbers (first, second, etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.3 The counting marker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
7 Prepositions 42
7.1 Two types of prepositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7.2 Abbreviated forms of prepositional phrases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
7.3 Multiple prepositions at once . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
7.4 Connections to other topics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
II Verbs 46
8 How Dari verbs work 47
8.1 Every Dari verb has two stems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
8.2 Subject agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
8.3 Compound verbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
8.4 Verbs that take objects and/or prepositional phrases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
8.4.1 Object suffixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8.5 Double Negatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8.6 Active & Passive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
8.7 Form/Meaning/Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
9 Is & Was 55
9.1 Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
9.1.1 Present tense (‘is’) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
9.1.2 Past tense (‘was’) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
9.1.3 Other forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
9.2 Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
10 Commands: Go! 58
10.1 Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
10.1.1 Informal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
10.1.2 Formal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
10.1.3 Irregular forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
10.2 Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
10.3 Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
14 Future: I will go 68
14.1 Colloquial (Spoken) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
14.1.1 Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
14.1.2 Meaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
14.2 Formal (Written) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
14.2.1 Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
14.2.2 Meaning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
14.3 Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
21 Participles: going 93
21.1 Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
21.2 Constructions that use participles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
21.2.1 Participle followed by a verb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
21.2.2 Participle followed by ‘to go’ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
21.2.3 More ways to talk about ongoing actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
21.2.4 The participle as an adjective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
21.3 The present participle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
21.4 Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
CONTENTS v
IV Appendices 97
A Suggested answers for the practice exercises 98
B Glossary 104
vi
Chapter 1
Introduction
start by looking through the materials that have been made freely available online: http://tinyurl.com/growingparticipation
2 Nation (2007). Other ‘language-focused’ learning activities would be things like drilling vocabulary, working on pronunciaiton,
1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 2
You’ll gesture at the clock—or maybe draw a clock on a sheet of paper—and work it out between yourselves.
Later on you’ll hear an expression that sounds like ‘ten minutes till five’ and follow it up by confirming that it
means ‘4:50’. And so forth. That’s the warp and woof of language learning.
Accordingly, I have not included a list of vocabulary.3 Your vocabulary list should be determined by what
comes up in your language lessons, rather than by what words some linguist thinks might be helpful for week
10 or whatever. So, for instance, Chapter 17 makes a point of not enumerating the dozen or so ways that
a Dari speaker could say, ‘We ought to...’; Chapter 7—which is about prepositions—does not have a list of
prepositions. You should pick these things up from your friends and teachers.
This book is in some sense a replacement for the ‘Glassman book’ (Glassman, 2000), a book written in
the 1970s (and subsequently revised) that has served as the basis for LCP’s grammar instruction even after
its adoption of the Growing Participator Approach. Four decades of continuous use testifies to the usefulness
of the Glassman book. It remains a valuable source of example sentences, and also of cultural knowledge.
The Glassman consists of twenty-five lessons, which fit nicely into the six months that IAM has traditionally
allocated for dedicated language study. Some people will naturally yearn for such a structured language
curriculum, and will wonder why this book defers to the Growing Participator Approach for the content of
lessons. The reason, following on from the discussion above, is that there is a danger in the Glassman approach:
the danger is that you will learn to speak Dari, but you will not learn how to learn Dari. A structured curriculum
feels good for the first six months, but on the first day of the seventh month the floor falls out from under
you. Too many people finish the Long Course without the skills to continue their language learning. As a
language coach, I assure you that this is the rule rather than the exception. If you don’t leave the Long Course
with the ability to plan and conduct your subsequent language study, you’re going to be frustrated with your
subsequent progress in Dari.
1.2 Organization
You are not intended to go through this book chapter-by-chapter. Instead, the book is laid out thematically.
Different topics are covered in different chapters. If the chapter on the future comes before the subjunctive,
that does not mean that you should learn the future first in your lessons. Your language lessons should expose
you to new grammar in a natural and organic way—that is to say, your language lessons should not be arranged
according to grammatical topic!4
You might want to read straight through if you’ve already got a decent knowledge of spoken Dari and are
trying to brush up your grammar.
Where appropriate, the chapter ends with a few practice drills, sentences that you should try to say in
Dari. All of the example sentences are silly (e.g., ‘The dinosaur will be slaughtered on Wednesday.’). That’s
because you shouldn’t take grammar drills too seriously. Focused study of the grammar of a language, and
even drilling grammatical constructions, is part of a balanced language learning program. But, your previous
experience in learning a language has probably lead you to overemphasize the importance of grammar drills.
You can use the silly examples to get a foothold into the grammar, but the real practice needs to happen in
the real world.
dead language, this might make sense. If you’re studying a language in order to use it in real life, you’re not going to go around speaking
in masculine nouns for weeks before learning the feminine ones. (Not that Dari has a gender distinction.)
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 3
learning literary Dari won’t help you to talk about the news with someone afterwards. If you want the full
experience of the culture, you need to expect to learn both.
What does this all mean for you, as a learner of Dari? It means that you can expect to hear different things
from different people. Expect to find differences in the way people speak. Expect villagers to speak differently
from city-dwellers. And—though this is painful—expect to learn words in your lessons that won’t always work
on the street. Different people talk differently, and you need to accept that.5
There is no question that you will have many frustrating experiences. It may help though to frame the
problem correctly. If your goal is, “I want to finish studying Dari,” then the constant variation will be an
annoyance. If your goal is, “I want to engage better with Afghan culture by learning more Dari,” then getting
exposure to that variation is a benefit. This is a bit like eating out internationally: if you only ever want
the familiar, the diversity of an international menu is an annoyance. If you want to appreciate new flavors,
however, the diversity of the menu is an exciting opportunity.
You should be intentional about getting exposure to the kind of speech that you want to understand and
produce. That may mean finding opportunities to speak with people from different places or educational
backgrounds. This is not necessarily a task for your first six months, but you should be intentional about it as
you grow in your language ability.
What does variation mean for this book? Perhaps this much is obvious: this book doesn’t contain all the
variation! This is not an exhaustive resource. This is a middle-of-the-road Dari grammar. There are occasional
notes about dialect variation, but these only cover the most obvious differences. It’s not even the case that
your own experience needs to supplement this book: no, your experience comes first, and this book fills in
some cracks and puts it into order. So when you ask your language teacher for a word, and it’s different from
what you read here, don’t be surprised. That’s a normal part of learning Dari.
always said [bʌ xʌtɛrɛ ke] (with the same meaning). I studied in the classroom for six months with various teachers, but never learned
the preposition [katɛ] ‘with’, because my teachers were all more educated people who said [hamrʌjɛ].
6 Just to bring this home: my own flashcards currently have two words that mean ‘donkey’, six words for ‘dawn’, three words for ‘angry’
(to which I could add several more), and so forth. It’s not just the literary words that have multiples.
7 This is just like English. People might have a sense that you can mess up who and whom, without actually knowing which is correct.
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 4
things, that means that you’re able to speak appropriately to people of different educational levels, and in
contexts of differing formality.
Dari is an international language. Dari is the name of the variety of Persian spoken in Afghanistan.
In Iran the same language is called Farsi, and in Tajikistan the same language is called Tajiki. The language
varies between these countries in part because of simple regional differences. Some of these differences are
reflected in Afghan Dari: the Dari spoken towards Herat has more of an Iranian flavor, and the Dari spoken
in the Northeast has some more Tajik elements. There are also differences in loan words: Iran brings in more
French words, Tajikistan brings in more Russian words, and Afghanistan (lately) has brought in a lot of English
words. The practical upshot of this is: more words! You can also be aware of these sorts of differences if you
have the opportunity to visit multiple regions of Afghanistan, or interact with Persian speakers from different
countries.
People may ‘help’ you by speaking formally. The fact that Dari has a literary standard informs people’s
ideas about what the ‘real’ language is. This in turn has consequences for how they’ll try to help. Suppose
someone says [mʌm merʊm] ‘I’m going too’, but you don’t understand. The might correct it to [man ham
merʊm], which is the formal way to say that sentence. You may not want to learn to say [man ham merʊm],
but part of being a competent speaker of Dari is recognizing it when you hear it.
In every culture, there are times when we do not speak the truth directly. No one gives an honest appraisal
of a meal after having been a guest—“The beef was too dry, but at least the dessert was good.” No one says
what they think when they see a newborn—“She’s ugly now, but I’m sure that’ll pass.” No one gives an honest
review after a child’s first violin recital—“Well played, aside from the notes!” This is not being dishonest,
because no one expects the literal truth in those situations. If a hostess wants to know the truth about the
beef, she has to ask her husband after the evening has ended.
But Westerners can get huffy when Afghans do the same thing—because Afghans might do it in different
contexts. For instance, if you call a friend who is late for an appointment, she will say, “I’m on my way”—no
matter whether she is on the way or not. That’s the polite thing to say in that siutation. If you take it as a
promise and feel lied to, you’re just misunderstanding the interaction.
If you ask an Afghan his/her opinion of a report you wrote, s/he will praise it, giving at most one suggestion.
If you accept the praise but ignore the suggestion, you’re misunderstanding the interaction. The suggestion
could be quite important; it’s just been padded with praise to make it more palatable.
Frustrating? Yes. Time-wasting? Yes. But remember: it’s only frustrating and time-wasting because
you don’t understand what’s going on. Once you get some experience of the culture, you’ll begin to better
understand how things work, and it will be a lot less frustrating.
One final note: indirect communication is not deceptive communication. But that does not mean that
deception is impossible. As in any culture, Afghans can intentionally deceive people; that behavior warrants
whatever moral reaction you feel is appropriate. The key is not to perceive an intent to deceive where none
exists.
1.7 Conventions
Dari examples are typically presented in the International Phonetic Alphabet, the Dari script, and with a free
translation. This is illustrated in the example below.
The IPA script represents colloqiual, spoken pronunciation, rather than the formal pronunciation. Therefore,
if a teacher were to read the Dari script, it will often be different to what is shown in IPA. People who have
mastered the basics of reading should be familiar with the more formal pronunciation anyway. The Dari script
is there for any readers who have already learned to read Dari and are using this book to learn grammar; it is
not assumed that every reader will make use of it.
There is also a free translation of the sentence or phrase. In the example above, ‘I am working’ is a free
translation of the sentence. The translation marked ‘Lit.’ is a more literal translation, in stilted English that
better represents the structure of the Dari sentence.
For some sentences it is helpful to see the word broken up bit-by-bit. This is shown in the example below.
Every word and every part of a word is given its own definition. This can help you to appreciate how the
various prefixes and suffixes are used. In the last word of the example below the first part of the word [me]
corresponds to mi, the second part [kʊn] corresponds to the second label ‘do,’ and so forth. Abbreviations are
used to save space—which is initially difficult but in the long run is less frustrating; see page vi for a key.
A different way is to line up each bit with its own label, as below. In this case you need to keep in mind
that the bits connected by a hyphen (-) are part of the same word.
• Don’t focus too much on the ‘why’. One way to say ‘I like it’ in Dari is literally, ‘My happiness comes.’
You’ll drive yourself crazy if you focus on why you say it like that. The important thing is to learn that
you say it like that, and to be able to say it like that yourself. It’s good to press yourself to understand
grammar, but be aware that at the end of the day, the answer is often: that’s just the way it is!
• There are some grammar things you need to think about (like the object marker and the subjunctive;
Chapters 6 and 17), and some that you just need to beat into your brain. Practicing subject agreement
with the various verb forms belongs in the latter category. Every verb chapter has an example paradigm,
and you could do worse than to chant those paradigms to yourself for five or ten minutes until it starts
coming out naturally.
• There are relatively few citations in this book. I have cited sources that offer unique insights. Claims
that are not cited are “common knowledge” within Persian grammar (i.e., they could be confirmed
by consulting any of the grammars in the bibliography), or are generalizations based upon my own
experience of Dari.
• This book is being written in concert with A Learner’s Grammar of Southern Uzbek. Many portions of the
books are identical, since a lot of things that need to be said about language learning for both languages.
1.10 Acknowledgments
My deepest thanks go to Hamidullah Muradi (Hamid), of the Mazar LCP. Most or all of the sentences in this
book have been checked with Hamid; many of them are his own contributions. He has been unfailingly patient
as I checked obscure linguistic ideas against his Dari intuitions. He also produced many generalizations of his
own, which have strengthened the book.
Mustafa, also of the Mazar LCP, also provided examples and discussion on a number of points.
Amy Baker read the entire draft and made many helpful corrections and suggestions. Thanks also to Liz
Green, Stephanie Lockery, Daniel Stent, and Stephen Wilkey for providing feedback on draft chapters.
Chapter 2
Pronunciation
Clear and accurate pronunciation is a very important part of learning to speak Dari. You need to learn the
sounds so that you can hear words correctly, and say words correctly. More generally, you want to be able to
communicate without burdening people with difficult-to-understand Dari. All of us have had experiences
speaking to non-native speakers of our language. Almost no one is able to remove their foreign accent
completely, but many people are able to speak with a perfectly acceptable foreign accent. That is what you
should aim for in your pronunciation. You should focus on correct pronunciation immediately when you begin
to speak. Don’t let mispronunciations set in!
This book shows the pronunciation of Dari words with with one symbol for each sound. This sidesteps the
problem of trying to show pronunciation with English spelling, which is a big hassle.
If you’re curious, the letters are all from the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), which you may have
seen before in dictionaries or other language courses. If you want to learn more, there are various resources
available. For instance, partway down the English Wikipedia article for the IPA1 there are charts of symbols;
clicking on the symbols will take you to pages with descriptions and recordings of the sounds. You can also
do an internet search for the ‘IPA Name’ given for each sound below, to get a more specific description of how
that sound is made.
When possible the sounds are illustrated with English words. Do not take these illustrations too seriously,
especially for the vowels. You need to develop a good Dari accent, rather than just saying Dari words with
your English accent. Your teacher’s pronunciation should be your guide.
There’s a lot of information in this chapter, but it’s not a list of things to memorize. You really just need
to learn the sound that goes with each letter. You should be able to read all of the example words by the end.
If you can do that, you’re done. The other stuff, for instance the descriptions of where the tongue is, is just
there to help you get the pronunciation right. If you don’t need it, ignore it.
2.1 Vowels
The IPA symbols for vowel sounds are quite different from their typical realization in English, because the IPA
is consistent and English spelling is a mess. You’ll probably need to learn the vowel symbols all from scratch.
There are three symbols for vowels that are not part of the English alphabet: [ɛ], [ʌ], and [ʊ].
As in English... peep
i
Dari Examples [id] ‘eid’ ﻋﯿﺪ
[sir] ‘garlic’ ﺳﯿﺮ
[xʊʃi] ‘happiness’ ﺧﻮﺷﯽ
IPA Name close front unrounded vowel
As in English... made
e
Dari Examples [seb] ‘apple’ ﺳﯿﺐ
[ne] ‘no’ ﻧﻪ
[se] ‘three’ ﺳﻪ
IPA Name close-mid front unrounded vowel
1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Phonetic_Alphabet
7
CHAPTER 2. PRONUNCIATION 8
As in English... send
ɛ
Dari Examples [sɛn] ‘age’ ﺳﻦ
[ɛhsʌs] ‘feeling’ اﺣﺴﺎس
[balɛ] ‘yes’ ﺑﻠﻪ
IPA Name open-mid front unrounded vowel
As in English... bad
a
Dari Examples [asp] ‘horse’ اﺳﺐ
[sad] ‘hundred’ ﺻﺪ
[zina] ‘stairs’ زﯾﻨﻪ
IPA Name open front unrounded vowel
As in English... caught
ʌ
Dari Examples [ʌʃ] ‘noodles’ آش
[bʌd] ‘wind’ ﺑﺎد
[kɛtʌbhʌ] ‘books’ ﮐﺘﺎبﻫﺎ
IPA Name open-mid back unrounded vowel
This sound does not have a direct English equivalent. For some English speakers, ‘caught’ and ‘cot’ have
different vowel systems; if that is the case for you, then [ʌ] is like the vowel in ‘caught’ except that the lips are
not round. Alternately (for anyone), it is like the vowel in ‘cot’, except deeper and further back in the mouth.2
As in English... boot
u
Dari Examples [u] ‘him/her/it’ او
[sud] ‘interest/profit’ ﺳﻮد
[tu] ‘you (sg.)’ ﺗﻮ
IPA Name close back rounded vowel
As in English... boat
o
3
Dari Examples [o] ‘and’ و
[doɣ] ‘buttermilk’ دوغ
[kino] ‘tangerine’ ﮐﯿﻨﻮ
IPA Name close-mid back rounded vowel
As in English... book
ʊ
Dari Examples [bʊt] ‘idol’ ﺑﺖ
[pʊl] ‘bridge’ ﭘﻞ
[mʊhɛm] ‘important’ ﻣﻬﻢ
IPA Name near-close back rounded vowel
2.2 Consonants
As in English... pop
p
Dari Examples [patnus] ‘tray’ ﭘﻄﻨﻮس
[tapa] ‘hill’ ﺗﭙﻪ
[pamp] ‘pump’ ﭘﻤﭗ
IPA Name voiceless bilabial plosive
2 This is certainly not the sound in ‘hope’. Certain expatriates pronounced [kʌkʌ] ‘father’s brother’ like ‘cocoa’, which is not correct.
As in English... ball
b
Dari Examples [bʌlʌ] ‘above’ ﺑﺎﻻ
[rʊbʌb] ‘kind of stringed instrument’ رﺑﺎب
[ʌdʌb] ‘manners’ آداب
IPA Name voiced bilabial plosive
As in English... tap
t
Dari Examples [tʌ] ‘until’ ﺗﺎ
[hatʌ] ‘hill’ ﺣﺘﯽ
ٰ
[but] ‘boot/shoe’ ﺑﻮت
IPA Name voiceless dental plosive
As in English... damp
d
Dari Examples [dost] ‘friend’ دوﺳﺖ
[ʌdam] ‘person’ آدم
[bʌd] ‘wind’ ﺑﺎد
IPA Name voiced dental plosive
As in English... cat
k
Dari Examples [kʌh] ‘straw’ ﮐﺎه
[hakam] ‘referee’ ﺣﮑﻢ
[kʊmak] ‘help’ ﮐﻤﮏ
IPA Name voiceless velar plosive
As in English... got
ɡ
Dari Examples [gala] ‘flock’ ﮔﻠﻪ
[aga(r)] ‘if’ اﮔﺮ
[barg] ‘leaf’ ﺑﺮگ
IPA Name voiced velar plosive
As in English... N/A
q
Dari Examples [qʌnun] ‘law’ ﻗﺎﻧﻮن
[ʌqʌ] ‘sir’ آﻗﺎ
[amiq] ‘deep’ ﻋﻤﯿﻖ
IPA Name voiceless uvular plosive
This is the first sound that is not in English. It is like a [k], but with the tongue moved further back in
the mouth. The sound is called ‘uvular’ because the tongue goes all the way back and touches the uvula, the
hanging ball thing at the back of your mouth.4 (You can look at it in the mirror, but don’t try to touch it or
you’ll gag.) Most English speakers will have a hard time with this sound. You’re most likely to confuse it with
[k], so practice the pairs of words in Table 2.1 to get it right.
As in English... mix
m
Dari Examples [mʌst] ‘yogurt’ ﻣﺎﺳﺖ
[hamʌm] ‘bath(house)’ ﺣامم
[xʌnʊm] ‘wife’ ﺧﺎﻧﻢ
IPA Name voiced bilabial nasal
4 You’ve probably always wondered what that was for. Now you know.
CHAPTER 2. PRONUNCIATION 10
Compare... With...
5
[qahr] «‘ »ﻗﻬﺮangry’ [kar] «‘ »ﮐﺮdeaf’
[farq] «‘ »ﻓﺮقdifference’ [dark] «‘ »درکunderstanding’
[qʌbɛl] «‘ »ﻗﺎﺑﻞworthy’ [kʌbʊl] «‘ »ﮐﺎﺑﻞKabul’
[qalam] «‘ »ﻗﻠﻢpen’ [kal] «‘ »ﮐﻞbald’
Table 2.1: Pairs of words for contrasting the sounds [k] and [q].
As in English... nick
n
Dari Examples [nʌn] ‘nan/bread’ ﻧﺎن
[anʌr] ‘pomegranate’ اﻧﺎر
[almʌn] ‘Germany’ اﳌﺎن
IPA Name voiced dental nasal
As in English... fat
f
Dari Examples [fʌl] ‘active’ ﻓﺎل
[hafta] ‘week’ ﻫﻔﺘﻪ
[hadaf] ‘goal’ ﻫﺪف
IPA Name voiceless labiodental fricative
As in English... sip
s
Dari Examples [sandali] ‘type of heater’ ﺻﻨﺪﻟﯽ
[pɛsar] ‘son’ ﭘﴪ
[dʌs] ‘sickle’ داس
IPA Name voiceless dental sibilant
As in English... zip
z
Dari Examples [zar] ‘poison’ زﻫﺮ
[ʌzʌd] ‘free’ آزاد
[bʊz] ‘goat’ ﺑﺰ
IPA Name voiced dental sibilant
As in English... ship
ʃ
Dari Examples [ʃast] ‘sixty’ ﺷﺼﺖ
[huʃjʌr] ‘clever’ ﻫﻮﺷﯿﺎر
[ʃaʃ] ‘six’ ﺷﺶ
IPA Name voiceless palato-alveolar sibilant
This is an unfamiliar letter, but a familiar sound. For the sake of clarity and consistency, the IPA practice is
to write one sound with one letter. That means that the ‘sh’ sound should be written with one symbol, which
is [ʃ]. It looks like a drawn out [s], which is not a bad description of the sound itself.
As in English... azure
ʒ
Dari Examples [ʒʌla] ‘dew’ ژاﻟﻪ
[nɛʒʌd] ‘race’ ﻧﮋاد
[dɛʒ] ‘citadel’ دژ
IPA Name voiced palato-alveolar sibilant
This also is a new letter as well, though the sound is familiar. This is the first sound in ‘Jean’ (said the
French way), or the middle sound in words like ‘vision’.
5 The formal pronunciation of this word is [qahr]. If your teacher uses that pronunciation, ask for the [ʌmijʌna] pronunciation so that
you can focus on [k] vs. [q] instead of the [h]. Or, contrast it with [kʌr] «‘ »ﮐﺎرwork’ instead.
CHAPTER 2. PRONUNCIATION 11
Compare... With...
[mʊrɣ] «‘ »ﻣﺮغchicken’ [marg] «‘ »ﻣﺮگdeath’
[aɣʌz] «‘ »اﻏﺎزbeginning’ [ʌgʌh] «‘ »آﮔﺎهaware’
[ɣalat] «‘ »ﻏﻠﻂmistake’ [gala] «‘ »ﮔﻠﻪflock’
Table 2.2: Pairs of words for contrasting the sounds [ɣ] and [g].
As in English... N/A
x
Dari Examples [xat] ‘line’ ﺧﻂ
[ʌxɛr] ‘last’ آﺧﺮ
[tʌrix] ‘history/date’ ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ
IPA Name voiceless velar fricative
This is a familiar letter, but a new sound.6 The tongue is in almost the same position as for a [k], but instead
of stopping the air completely, the air is let through in a hiss.7 Try making a long [k] and then loosening up
a bit. You should be consciously trying to make a non-English sound with this one. English speakers will
typically replace this sound with either [h] or [k]; see Table 2.3 for contrasts between [x] and [k].
As in English... N/A
ɣ
Dari Examples [ɣʌr] ‘cave’ ﻏﺎر
[lʌɣar] ‘skinny’ ﻻﻏﺮ
[bʌɣ] ‘garden’ ﺑﺎغ
IPA Name voiced velar fricative
This is a new sound and a new letter. Just as [x] is a sort of relaxed version of [k], [ɣ] is a sort of relaxed
[g].8 It sounds a bit like a growl at first. This is not an English sound, so you should be making an effort
with this one. Table 2.2 offers some contrasts between [ɣ] and [g], sounds that an English speaker is likely to
confuse.
As in English... hat
h
Dari Examples [har] ‘every’ ﻫﺮ
[lahza] ‘moment’ ﻟﺤﻈﻪ
[koh] ‘mountain’ ﮐﻮه
IPA Name voiceless glottal fricative
Many speakers of Dari drop [h] completely; many others will use it only occasionally. If a person is
speaking formally, or reading aloud, the [h] is more likely to be pronounced. You don’t need to worry about
which words have [h] and which ones don’t; you’ll learn when you start to read and write. In this book the
[h] is written consistently, according to the formal pronunciation; if your dialect of spoken Dari drops [h]
consistently, you can just ignore it.
As in English... chat
tʃ
Dari Examples [tʃand] ‘several/how many?’ ﭼﻨﺪ
[batʃa] ‘child’ ﺑﭽﻪ
[mʊrtʃ] ‘pepper’ ﻣﺮچ
IPA Name voiceless palato-alveolar affricate
The [tʃ] sound works as a single sound in Dari, but from the perspective of phonetics it is two sounds, and
is therefore written with two letters.9
6 This is not the sound at the end of an English word like ‘ax’, but an entirely different sound.
7 You may know this sound if you pronounce ‘loch’ the Scottish way, or ‘Bach’ the German way—though most English speakers just
use a [k] in those words. This is also the ‘j’ sound in some dialects of Spanish.
8 If it’s meaningful to you: [ɣ] is the voiced counterpart of [x].
9 If you say ‘at shoe’ quickly, you’ll realize that it’s the same as saying ‘achoo’. It’s possible to write [tʃ] with a little tie to emphasize
Compare... With...
[tʌrik] «‘ »ﺗﺎرﯾﮏdark’ [tʌrix] «‘ »ﺗﺎرﯾﺦhistory’
[kek] «‘ »ﮐﯿﮏcake’ [mex] «‘ »ﻣﯿﺦnail’
[kar] «‘ »ﮐﺮdeaf’10 [xar] «‘ »ﺧﺮdonkey’
[kʊʃ] «‘ »ﮐﺶkiller’ [xʊʃ] «‘ »ﺧﻮشhappy’
Table 2.3: Pairs of words for contrasting the sounds [k] and [x].
As in English... Jim
dʒ
Dari Examples [dʒɛn] ‘Jinn (demon)’ ﺟﻦ
[badʒa] ‘o’clock’ ﺑﺠﻪ
[hadʒ] ‘Hajj’ ﺣﺞ
IPA Name voiced palato-alveolar affricate
This sound similarly is written with two letters, which reflects its pronunciation.
As in English... N/A
r
Dari Examples [rabʌb] ‘kind of stringed instrument’ رﺑﺎب
[ara] ‘saw’ اره
[bʌr] ‘load’ ﺑﺎر
IPA Name voiced dental flap11
The [r] sound of Dari is different than the r-sound that you use in English. If you use your original r-sound,
your pronunciation will be wrong. Making a Dari [r] should feel like you’re making an entirely different sound,
even if you still think of it as ‘r’.12 All you have to do is tap your tongue lightly behind your teeth. The Dari [r]
is more similar to the r-sound used in Spanish, Romanian, or Russian, so if all else fails you could try imitating
the accent of one of those languages as a way of trying to get your tongue to behave.
As in English... wood
w
Dari Examples [wʌsɛta] ‘inside connection’ واﺳﻄﻪ
[hawʌ] ‘air’ ﻫﻮا
[gʌw] ‘cow’ ﮔﺎو
IPA Name voiced labiovelar glide
Dari doesn’t distinguish between [w] and [v]. Most places in Afghanistan, [w] is used, but you’ll hear [v]
used variably in the speech of people with a Herati accent. (They’re following Iranian pronunciation.)
As in English... yes
j
Dari Examples [jak] ‘one’ ﯾﮏ
[sʌja] ‘shade’ ﺳﺎﯾﻪ
[lʌj] ‘muddy’ ﻻی
IPA Name voiced palatal glide
Note that IPA uses [j] for the sound that English usually writes with ‘y’. This is strange for English speakers,
but quite natural for Germans, Norwegians, Finns, and others.
As in English... leper
l
Dari Examples [lab] ‘lip’ ﻟﺐ
[bʌlʌ] ‘above’ ﺑﺎﻻ
[halʌl] ‘halal’ ﺣﻼل
IPA Name voiced dental lateral approximant
10 Note that [kar] is the less polite term for ‘deaf’. The more polite term is [nʌʃɛnawʌ] «»ﻧﺎﺷﻨﻮا.
11 The proper IPA symbol for a voiced dental (or alveolar) flap is [ɾ], but the IPA makes an allowance for use of the simpler letter [r]
when doing so introduces no ambiguity in the transcription, which is the case for Dari.
12 If you’re a speaker of American English, you produce something like [r] in the middle of a word like ‘beater’.
CHAPTER 2. PRONUNCIATION 13
As in English... uh-oh
ʔ
Dari Examples [ʔatr] ‘perfume’ ﻋﻄﺮ
[taʔadʒʊb] ‘surprise’ ﺗﻌﺠﺐ
[manɛʔ] ‘prohibition’ ﻣﻨﻊ
IPA Name glottal stop
This final sound, which is not in English except in the middle of the word ‘uh-oh’, is also marginal in Dari.
It is used sometimes in formal pronunciation, so it is included here for the sake of completeness. In everyday
speech, for instance, the pronunciation of ‘surprise’ is [tadʒʊb], but if someone were speaking formally or
reading aloud, it might come out as [taʔadʒʊb] instead. Words that have this sound come from Arabic.
2.3 Stress
Stress has to do with emphasis on syllables.13 In English, if you rejéct someone, they become a réject. If you
convért somebody, they become a cónvert. If you you want to protést something, you may attend a prótest.
Stress can change when you add bits to the word, like how gýrate becomes gyrátion. When people get the
stress wrong, it makes it really hard to understand them. Fortunately, stress is completely predictable in Dari,
and there are really just a few words to learn. This section makes references to grammatical categories that
won’t be familiar to a beginner speaker. If you don’t catch something, you can just come back to it later.
In Dari, as in English, verbs work different from every other kind of word. We’ll begin with everything
except verbs, and then talk about verbs.
There are two systematic exceptions. The exceptions are two suffixes that never ever take stress. The first
suffix is the ezafa marker, the handy little vowel that can seemingly join any two words:
(6) a. [séb-ɛ sʊ́rx] ‘red apple’ (not [seb-ɛ́ sʊ́rx]) ﺳﯿﺐ ﴎخ
b. [ʊtʌ́q-ɛ kalʌ́n] ‘large room’ (not [ʊtʌq-ɛ́ kalʌ́n]) اﻃﺎق ﮐﻼن
c. [ʊtʌ́q-ɛ sʊ́rx-ɛ kalʌ́n] ‘large red room’ اﻃﻠﻖ ﴎخ ﮐﻼن
The second suffix is the indefinite marker, the suffix that turns ‘man’ into ‘a man.’
(7) [márd-e ʌ́mad] ‘a man came’ (not [mard-é ʌ́mad]) ﻣﺮدی آﻣﺪ
2.3.2 Verbs
For verbs with prefixes, the stress goes on the first syllable. (The prefix will either be [me], [na], or [b].) Here
are some examples:
13 The text of this section is lightly revised from a blog post written by the author, available at https://www.iam-afghanistan.org/lcp/
2015/11/14/stressed-out-about-stress/.
CHAPTER 2. PRONUNCIATION 14
There are weird little exceptions to these rules, but this covers 99.9% of the words. You don’t need to worry
about the nitty-gritty, like how [bʌ́jad] and [ʃʌ́jad] have a verb-like stress pattern because they’re originally
from the verbs [bʌjɛstan] ‘to have to’ and [ʃʌjɛstan] ‘to be proper.’ You may need to worry about dialectal
variation. Stress can vary somewhat from location to location in Afghanistan.
Student: kʌʃʊk
14 See how even the phonetic letters are different to the ones we’ve learned in this chapter?
CHAPTER 2. PRONUNCIATION 15
The teacher can’t press this forever: at some point they have to give up. A more deferential teacher will pretend
that you’ve got it; a less deferential teacher will just give up on you. What’s the solution? The first thing is
not to beat your head against a wall. If you’re not able to hear the difference between your pronunciation and
your teacher’s pronunciation, make a note of the word that is confusing you. Then you can review it later,
on your own. This will probably involve going back over the sounds of the word, and maybe practicing the
contrast in private.
If you’re able to hear the difference but it’s not just coming out, it can also help just to make a private
note and return to it later. The author, for instance, struggled for years to correctly pronounce [sadʌ] ‘sound’
and [sʌda] ‘simple’. Everyone will have his/her own mental blocks. Avoid frustrating and non-productive
interactions with your teacher, but make a note about difficult words so that you can come back to them later
on.
Part I
Nouns
16
Chapter 3
This chapter provides information about the basics of Dari nouns and adjectives. These are fairly straightforward,
and you start learning nouns at least from your first day of language. This chapter will therefore probably not
have many surprises for people with even a modest experience of Dari. It may help to solidify some existing
intuitions, however.
Definition: Noun
A noun is a word that refers to a person, place, thing, or idea.
Definition: Adjective
An adjective is a word that describes a noun, like ‘big’, ‘scary’, or ‘intimidating.’
17
CHAPTER 3. NOUNS & ADJECTIVES 18
In colloquial Dari, the [h] is not pronounced, so the plural suffix becomes [ʌ]. When a word ends in [a],
then the [ʌ] gobbles up the [a]:
When the plural [ʌ] is added to other words ending in vowels, there can be a connecting sound like [w] or
[j]. These sounds just come in automatically when two vowels come together, so you probably don’t need to
think about this too much.
The plural form of the noun is not used when you use a number; you just use the singular. This is different
from English.
The word [tʌ] in the sentence above is a sort of counting word, and is discussed further in Chapter 5.
Many Dari words are originally from Arabic, and these Arabic words often have their own plural forms.
These are not at all common in the spoken language, though some people use them. Learning these is a matter
of practice. It may help to know that the consonants are usually preserved in the same order between the
singular and plural forms (sometimes with a doubling), but this is more helpful in reading—when you have a
moment to think about such things—than in listening. A good dictionary will point you to the singular form
if you look up the plural.
1 As Thackston (1993, p. 58) points out, this suffix can also occur on paired body parts, and a few other nouns as well.
CHAPTER 3. NOUNS & ADJECTIVES 19
It would be wrong (and funny-sounding!) to say [haq-hʌ-jɛ baʃar] or [sʌzmʌn-ɛ mɛlat-hʌ-jɛ mʊtahɛd].
The ezafa marker is quite powerful. You can create phrases that are as complex as you need:
(26) [seb-ɛ sʊrx-ɛ rajis-ɛ dʒamhuri-jɛ afɣʌnɛstʌn] ‘the red apple of the president of Afghanistan’
ﺳﯿﺐ ﴎخ رﺋﯿﺲ ﺟﻤﻬﻮری اﻓﻐﺎﻧﺴﺘﺎن
If you haven’t yet come to the ezafa marker in your lessons, you’ll need to be patient with yourself as you
practice using it. As you can see, its use is quite easy to describe, but it’s another matter entirely to use it
properly.
Unlike some languages, Dari doesn’t care whether an adjective is modifying a singular or a plural noun: it
works the same either way. The ezafa marker comes after the plural.
CHAPTER 3. NOUNS & ADJECTIVES 20
In a long ezafa construction, there may be a mix of nouns and adjectives. How do you tell which adjectives
modify which nouns? The adjective always comes after the noun it modifies; it always modifies the noun that
is closest to it. Consider the examples below. In (28a), [kalʌn] «‘ »ﮐﻼنlarge’ has to be modifying [batʃa] «»ﺑﭽﻪ
‘boy’ because it follows right after it. In the same way, in (28b) it has to be modifying «[ »ﺳﯿﺐseb] ‘apple’,
because that is the closest noun to it.2
(28) a. [seb-ɛ batʃe kalʌn] ‘the big boy’s apple’ ﺳﯿﺐ ﺑﭽ ٔﻪ ﮐﻼن
b. [seb-ɛ kalʌn-ɛ batʃa] ‘the boy’s big apple’ ﺳﯿﺐ ﮐﻼن ﺑﭽﻪ
3.4 Possession
Dari has a few ways to show possesion, i.e., the difference between ‘apple’ and ‘Ahmad’s apple’ or ‘my apple’.
One way is just to join the possessor with the ezafa:
Possession can be indicated with the word [xʊd] « »ﺧﻮدwhen the possessor is the same as the subject. (See
§4.3 for more about the reflexive pronoun.)
There are more options when the possessor is a pronoun, like ‘my’ or ‘your’. (Pronouns are introduced
in §4.2.) The most common is to add a possessor suffix; these are shown in Paradigm 3.1. As with the full
pronouns, the possessor always goes at the end of a series of nouns joined with the ezafa:
2 Of course, (28b) would only make sense if the boy had several apples, one of which was large.
CHAPTER 3. NOUNS & ADJECTIVES 21
The pronunciation of the possessive suffixes changes slightly when the word they are attached to ends in
a vowel. These changes are exactly parallel to those undergone by the ezafa marker, as discussed in the last
section (§3.3). To review those: if the word ends in [a], the vowels combine to [e]. If the word ends in [u] or
[ʌ], you add a [j] (which is almost impossible not to do).
There are special emphatic pronouns, which are described fully in §4.4. These emphatic pronouns can be
included in possessive structures, with a varying degree of emphasis. As you would expect, the more words
you use, the greater the emphasis. A simple [kɛtʌb-ɛʃ] « »ﮐﺘﺎﺑﺶwould be the normal way to refer to ‘his book’,
but if you’re contrasting it with someone else’s book, it might become [kɛtʌb-ɛ u] «»ﮐﺘﺎب او. If you really want to
emphasize that it’s his book—or if you’d said it before and the person still doesn’t understand—you can bring
out [kɛtʌb-ɛ xʊd-ɛʃ] «»ﮐﺘﺎب ﺧﻮدش. And the most extreme form has the full pronoun spelled out [kɛtʌb-ɛ xʊd-ɛ
u] «»ﮐﺘﺎب ﺧﻮد او.3 Here is the same progression of emphasis with ‘me’:
It’s your toshak for the moment. If you tried to take the toshak home with you, the host might be forced to say:
3 At this point, of course, it’s probably just easier to let someone else have the book.
CHAPTER 3. NOUNS & ADJECTIVES 22
Literally this means, ‘That toshak is from me,’ but the meaning is that the toshak is his property. You use the
preposition [az] to indicate who actually owns the toshak.4 You can do this with any noun:
As with other constructions, when you’re using a pronoun, you can put in an emphatic pronoun (§4.4) for
extra emphasis.
Of course, it is more common for [kadan] « »ﮐﺮدنto be used in a compound verb. Here is the pattern applied
to [ʌbjʌri kadan] «‘ »آﺑﯿﺎری ﮐﺮدنto irrigate’:
Alternately, this form can become an adjective, in which case it follows the noun just like any other
adjective. From the verb [taʃwiq kadan] «‘ »ﺗﺸﻮﯾﻖ ﮐﺮدنto encourage’, we have:
The same can be done with other verbs, and with other compound verbs. From the verb [nɛdʒʌt dʌdan]
«‘ »ﻧﺠﺎت دادنto save’:
(49) nɛdʒʌt dɛhɛnda ﻧﺠﺎت دﻫﻨﺪه
‘savior’
There are other words formed on this pattern, which you might learn without knowing their derivation.
For instance, [nɛmʌjɛnda] «‘ »منﺎﯾﻨﺪهrepresentative’ comes from the root [nɛmudan] «‘ »منﻮدنto do, perform’. Or
again, the word [ʌfarinda] «‘ »آﻓﺮﯾﻨﺪهcreator’ comes from the root [ʌfaridan] «‘ »آﻓﺮﯾﺪنto do, perform’. The word
[newisɛnda] «‘ »ﻧﻮﯾﺴﻨﺪهwriter’ comes from [nɛwɛʃtan] «»ﻧﻮﺷنت, the more formal word for ‘to write’.
CHAPTER 3. NOUNS & ADJECTIVES 24
It’s also important to note that this is not the only pattern, so you should be cautious about forming new
words with it—or at least be willing to be corrected. For instance, the verb [tardʒuma kadan] «»ﺗﺮﺟﻤﻪ ﮐﺮدن
means ‘to translate’. You could guess that ‘translator’ would be [tardʒuma kʊnɛnda]. This is understandable,
but it’s not the ‘right’ word. Dari already has the words [mʊtardʒɛm] « »ﻣﱰﺟﻢand [tardʒʊmʌn] « »ﺗﺮﺟامنfor
‘translator’.
Now, [ʌfaridan] «‘ »آﻓﺮﯾﺪنto create’, [kʌstan] «‘ »ﮐﺎﺳنتto reduce’, and [afzudan] «‘ »اﻓﺰودنto increase’ are not
exactly the most common verbs in Dari, but identifying these words is still a good opportunity to learn new
words.
Chapter 4
Pronouns
This chapter covers pronouns, words like ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘it’, and ‘this’ that serve as stand-ins for nouns. There are
different kinds of pronouns, and the labels are not very important since you can generally translate directly
from the English to the Dari; I just have to put something in the section headers. We’ll start out with a
discussion of grammatical person.
4.1 Person
‘Person’ is a grammatical idea that is necessary for understanding lots of different things about Dari. The good
news is that it works just the same in Dari as it does in English. To understand person, you just need to imagine
yourself speaking to someone. You are the first person. The person you are speaking to is the second person.1
Everything else is the third person. (This would include an actual third person, but in fact anything else you
refer to counts as the third person.)
Person doesn’t make a huge difference in English verbs, but you can see how it works with the verb ‘to be’:
You can see how subject agreement works in Dari in §8.2. One thing that might throw you off with subject
agreement is that possessed nouns are always going to be third person. (This works the same in English and
Dari, so I’m showing you in English.)
So, for instance, even though ‘my hand’ is a part of ‘me’, grammatically it is the third person, because ‘hand’
is third person (i.e., it’s not me or you).
1 True story: as a senior in high school I was in an advanced English class, which you could actually get college credit for. Should be
taught by a pretty competent instructor, right? Well, one day the teacher was explaining something about first person and third person,
and one of the students says, “So if there’s a ‘first person’ and a ‘third person’, what’s the second person?” She thinks about it for a moment
and says, “There is no second person.” Now, this was before I got a Ph.D. in linguistics, but I still knew better than that, because I used
to read Choose Your Own Adventure books, which are written entirely in the second person. I advanced several arguments in favor of the
existence of the second person, not the least of which was to ask: “Why would there be a third person if there wasn’t a second person?”
And she held her ground! She wouldn’t admit that there was a second person!
25
CHAPTER 4. PRONOUNS 26
• Dari doesn’t have different pronouns for ‘I’ or ‘me’, as English does. Both are [ma].
• There are different forms for the singular ‘you’ and plural ‘you’ (i.e., when you are speaking to more than
one person). If you’re addressing a group of people [ʃʊmʌ] is always correct. If you’re addressing one
person, [ʃʊmʌ] is a way to show more respect. This is a bit of a cultural minefield, as discussed in §10.2.
• There is no difference between ‘he’, ‘she’, and ‘it’.
Paradigm 4.1 shows the abbreviations for the pronouns. The terms ‘first person’ and ‘second person’ may
be familiar from other grammar classes.
The difference between [tu] « »ﺗﻮand [ʃʊmʌ] « »ﺷامis part of everyday Dari. A less common way of indicating
respect is to refer to a person who is present with the plural [inʌ] « »اﯾﻦﻫﺎand to a person who is absent with
the plural [unʌ] «( »آﻧﻬﺎGlassman, 2000, p. 23). (These are actually demonstrative pronouns, as discussed in
the next section.) This is not common in contemporary Dari.
Indeed, Roberts claims that dropping the subject pronoun is actually the default thing to do (Roberts,
2009, Chapter 7). Since this is not something we do (often) in English, English speakers are likely to over-use
CHAPTER 4. PRONOUNS 27
pronouns. This is distracting to Dari speakers in a way that is not easy to explain.2 To develop the habit, you
might want to avoid using subject pronouns altogether, except when you want to introduce the subject, or
emphasize it somehow, as in the mini-dialogue below.
The reflexive can be the direct object, as above, or the object of a preposition, as below.
(58) ahmad hamrʌjɛ xʊd gap mezana. .اﺣﻤﺪ ﻫﻤﺮاه ﺧﻮد ﮔﭗ ﻣﯽزﻧﺪ
‘Ahmad is talking to himself.’
The reflexive pronoun can also be used to show possession, provided that the possessor is the subject (see §3.4
for more about possession in other instances).
It may go without saying, but the reflexive pronoun is required when you want to refer back to the subject.
The sentence below cannot mean “Ahmad hit himself”; the [u] « »اوhas to be interpreted as referring to a
different person.
The subject can also be shortened to a possessive suffix (§3.4), as if you were using a pronoun.
One tricky thing—given what we learned about the reflexive pronoun in the previous section—is that when
[xʊd] « »ﺧﻮدtakes a possessive suffix, it no longer has to refer to the subject. In the setence below, the subject
is [ma] «‘ »ﻣﻦI’, but the book belongs to someone else.
The nuclear option for emphasizing a pronoun involves using a personal pronoun followed by the possessed
form of [xʊd] «»ﺧﻮد, as in (67c) below. The sentences in (67) are given in increasing order of emphasis. The
more words you use, the more emphatic it gets.
These pronouns are also used—as they are in English—at the beginning of a noun phrase: ‘this apple’ as
opposed to ‘that apple’.
Numbers
Dari numbers are quite straightforward. Once you have the basic vocabulary, putting the numbers together is
easy, with just a few patterns. You should be able to pick them up with standard language-learning techniques.
If you’re planning your own lessons, you’ll want to spread the numbers out over several days, since related
numbers sound similar, as they do in English or any other language: [haft] «‘ »ﻫﻔﺖseven’ sounds like [haftʌd]
«‘ »ﻫﻔﺘﺎدseventy’. Eventually that will be a helpful mnemonic, but at first it’s just frustrating.
sɛfr 0 ۰ ﺻﻔﺮ
jak 1 ۱ ﯾﮏ
du 2 ۲ دو
seh 3 ۳ ﺳﻪ
tʃʌr 4 ۴ ﭼﻬﺎر
pandʒ / pajndʒ / pajn 5 ۵ ﭘﻨﺞ
ʃaʃ 6 ۶ ﺷﺶ
haft 7 ۷ ﻫﻔﺖ
haʃt 8 ۸ ﻫﺸﺖ
noh 9 ۹ ﻧﻪ
The numbers 10 through 19 tend to have similar sounds to their single-digit counterparts, but are not fully
predictable. All end in [dah] «‘ »دهten’. If you’re learning to read the numbers at the same time, you might
be surprised to see that Dari numbers are written left-to-right (like Western numbers), instead of right-to-left
(like Dari words).
dah 10 ۱۰ ده
jʌzdah 11 ۱۱ ﯾﺎزده
dʊwʌzdah 12 ۱۲ دوازده
sezdah 13 ۱۳ ﺳﯿﺰده
tʃʌrdah 14 ۱۴ ﭼﻬﺎرده
pʌnzdah 15 ۱۵ ﭘﺎﻧﺰده
ʃʌnzdah 16 ۱۶ ﺷﺎﻧﺰده
haftah / habdah 17 ۱۷ ﻫﻔﺪه
haʒdah 18 ۱۸ ﻫﺠﺪه
nozdah 19 ۱۹ ﻧﻮزده
After the teens, the number become regular. All are equivalent of ‘twenty-and-one’, ‘forty-and-six’ etc. For
instance, for the twenties we start with [bist] «‘ »ﺑﯿﺴﺖtwenty’:
30
CHAPTER 5. NUMBERS 31
bist 20 ۲۰ ﺑﯿﺴﺖ
si 30 ۳۰ ﺳﯽ
tʃɛl 40 ۴۰ ﭼﻬﻞ
pindʒʌ 50 ۵۰ ﭘﻨﺠﺎه
ʃast 60 ۶۰ ﺷﺼﺖ
haftʌd 70 ۷۰ ﻫﻔﺘﺎد
haʃtʌd 80 ۸۰ ﻫﺸﺘﺎد
nawad 90 ۹۰ ﻧﻮد
sad 100 ۱۰۰ ﺻﺪ
Larger numbers are similarly made by placing the larger numbers first, and separating the numbers with
[o] «‘ »وand’. When giving numbers with ‘one hundred’, it is necessary to say [jak sad] rather than just [sad]:
(72) [jak sad o si o pajndʒ] ‘one hundred thirty five’ ﯾﮏ ﺻﺪ و ﺳﯽ و ﭘﻨﺞ
Even larger numbers follow the same pattern. (There are two options for ‘billion’.)
(73) [se hazʌr o tʃʌr sad] ‘three thousand four hundred’ ﺳﻪ ﻫﺰار و ﭼﻬﺎر ﺻﺪ
A second variety of the ordinal numbers is formed by adding [in] to the normal ordinal. In this case, the
number goes before the noun.1
You can also see in the above examples that the plural marker is not used when you have a number. Instead
of ‘three apples’, Dari has the equivalent of ‘three apple’.
The counters are not used in time expressions, or with weights and measures (Thackston, 1993, p. 80):
(79) a. ma bare ʃaʃ mʌh ɛntɛzʌr kaʃidʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮای ﺷﺶ ﻣﺎه اﻧﺘﻈﺎر ﮐﺸﯿﺪم
‘I waited for six months.’
b. du kilo guʃt-ɛ gʌw bexaren! !دو ﮐﯿﻠﻮ ﮔﻮﺷﺖ ﮔﺎو ﺑﺨﺮﯾﺪ
‘Buy two kilos of beef!’
Depending on the dialect, humans may be counted with the word [nafar] « »ﻧﻔﺮinstead of [tʌ] « »ﺗﺎor [dʌna]
(Glassman, 2000, p. 97; Thackston, 1993, p. 79). This word also just means ‘person’. The sentences
«»داﻧﻪ
below are all equivalent.
There’s actually a whole world of obscure vocabulary to explore here. For everyday use, [tʌ] and [dʌna]
will work fine, but you might find the following expression in literature.3
1 Thackston (1993, pp. 81–82) says that the ordinal numbers ending in [ʊmin] refer to a changable or incidental order, whereas those
ending in [ʊm] are more fixed. In the example below, the claim is that ‘the fourth lesson’ is more changeable than ‘the third lesson’.
(76) dar dars-ɛ sɛwʊm, tʃahʌrʊmin dars-a xʌndem. . ﭼﻬﺎرﻣﯿﻦ درس را ﺧﻮاﻧﺪﯾﻢ، در درس ﺳﻮم
‘In the third lesson, we read the fourth lesson.’
seem to be the case in Afghan Persian. Glassman (2000, p. 97) suggests that when humans and animals are counted, [tʌ] is used, but that
they are otherwise interchangeable.
3 We have these in English too, Wikipedia suggests ‘five head of cattle’ and ‘ten stem of roses’.
CHAPTER 5. NUMBERS 33
One of the more difficult things about Dari is learning to use the object marker [ra] «»را. The object marker is
sometimes used after the direct object of the verb. The trick is know when to use it and when not to use it. A
traditional way to describe is to say that the object marker is used whenever the direct object is ‘definite’ or
‘specific’. Understanding what these terms will occupy us for most of the chapter!
Before we do that, a quick note on the term ‘object marker’: although a more accurate label for it would
be the ‘specific direct object marker’, that is a bit of a mouthful. In this book we use the term ‘object marker’
as a convenience, understanding that it’s not used to mark every object, just specific direct objects.
Let’s review the term ‘direct object’. The direct object is the noun (or noun phrase) that receives the action
of the verb. In the example below, ‘Halim’ is the direct object because Halim is the one who got hit.
That’s pretty much all there is to direct objects, although there are two other things worth mentioning.
First, sentences sometimes have an ‘indirect object’. In the example below, ‘apple’ is the direct object, and
‘Halim’ is the indirect object. The indirect object never receives the object marker. The apple is the thing
that’s being passed around, so it is the direct object.
The second thing is that not every sentence has a direct object. In some sentences, like (84a) below, there’s
just the subject and the verb. In others, like (84b), there is a prepositional phrase instead of a direct object.
Since ‘Halim’ has a preposition before it, it is not a direct object. Nouns in prepositional phrases never take
the object marker.
The object marker is only ever placed after a direct object. But it is not placed after every direct object,
only in certain situations. Let’s begin to think about this by taking a look at the two sentences below.
34
CHAPTER 6. THE OBJECT MARKER 35
The only difference is that the first doesn’t have the object marker, and the second does—in this case the object
marker is just the vowel [a] after ‘apple’. The first one isn’t talking about a specific apple: the speaker is just
eating an apple (or several apples). She’s apple-eating. In the second sentence, the speaker is talking about a
specific apple. Which apple? Well, outside of the context we don’t know. Maybe there’s a bowl of fruit on the
table, which everyone knows had only one apple, and she’s eating that apple.
You might notice that the sentence with the object marker is the one where the English translation has
‘the’.1 There’s something to that, but there’s more to it as well; we’ll see more below.
6.1 Pronunciation
The object marker has two different pronunciations, depending on whether it comes after a vowel or a
consonant. If it comes after a vowel, it is pronounced [ra]. If it comes after a consonant, it is pronounced [a].
Here are two examples:
You probably shouldn’t think about this too much. It’s a simple pattern, so you’ll probably just pick it up
naturally.
If the noun has other adjectives stuck on to it, then the object marker comes after all of them:
If you’re talking about several things at once, then the object marker comes at the very end of everything:
(89) ma seb-ɛ kalʌn o kino-jɛ ʃirin-a me-xor-ʊm .ﻣﻦ ﺳﯿﺐ ﮐﻼن و ﮐﯿﻨﻮی ﺷﯿﺮﯾﻦ را ﻣﯽﺧﻮرم
‘I’m eating the big apple and the sweet orange.’
1 In English ‘the’ is called the definite article, while the object marker has been said to refer either to definiteness, specificity,
referentiality, identifiability, and probably other terms that you don’t care about as well.
CHAPTER 6. THE OBJECT MARKER 36
6.3.1 The object marker marks things the hearer can identify
To understand when to use the object marker, we’re going to have to think a bit about how language works.
You know all this stuff because you need it to be able to speak English correctly, but you don’t know it
explicitly. So hang on for a bit, and prepare to stretch your mind.
Lots of times when we use nouns (or noun phrases), we’re speaking generally, instead of about particular
things. Here are some examples of non-specific uses of the word ‘book’.
Notice how, even though a book is a physical thing, these statements are not about specific books. They’re
about books in general. More specifically, (90a) is about ‘a book’ in the abstract, (90b) is about books that are
good, in general; and (90c) is about ‘books of poetry’ in general. Compare these to the following sentences,
where are statements about specific books.
Example (91a) is about a particular book lying on the table—perhaps the speaker is even pointing to it while
she speaks. Example (91b) is a command about a specific book. If you said that to someone right now, they
would be confused and say, “Which book?” They would know you were talking about a specific book, but it’s
confusing because they don’t know which one. In example (91c), ‘his first book’ refers to a specific book, Alan
Paton’s first book, Cry, the Beloved Country.
The example about Alan Paton’s first book highlights an important point. We’re not just talking about
physical objects, or things you can point to. “Alan Paton’s first book” refers to a specific book, but it doesn’t
refer to a particular physical object; these days it could refer to an electronic text, or maybe even the text of
the novel in the abstract. Take a look at these following sentences and make sure that you understand this
point.
Example (92a) is really about an electronic file, nothing concrete. What the speaker in (92b) is talking about
is the book itself, but not a particular copy of it: he can’t stand the book itself. And example (92c) should
really knock your socks off: a specific book doesn’t even have to be real. If I talk about ‘the book that I’m
going to write in five years’ time’, I’m talking about a specific book, even though it isn’t even a real book.3
Is your mind stretched out yet? Here is the pay-off: in Dari, direct objects are marked with the object if
they refer to a specific thing that the hearer can identify. Otherwise, they don’t get the object marker. I’m going
to express that several ways below.
2 The discussion in ths section relies on several linguistic publications (Karimi, 2003, 2005; Mace, 2003; Roberts, 2009; Shokouhi &
Kipka, 2003; Thackston, 1993); most of what I describe here is based upon Roberts (2009). These publications are all based on analyses of
Iranian Persian, so I have confirmed their claims with Afghan informants. Throughout the chapter I cite the works when I owe a particular
observation to that source, but I do not claim to be giving an accurate summary of the author’s claims, which are often quite technical.
My goal in this chapter is to strike a compromise between accuracy and clarity. For instance, although it seems to me that Roberts’s use
of ‘referentiality’ and ‘identifiability’ is more accurate, I find that Karimi’s term ‘specificity’ fits better into ‘plain’ English.
3 Which book? The one I wrote last year? No. The one I’ll write in ten years? No. The one I that I will write five years from now.
CHAPTER 6. THE OBJECT MARKER 37
• The object marker is the speaker’s way to saying to the hearer, “you know what I’m talking about.” For
instance, “I’m eating the apple [ra]—you know which apple I’m talking about.”4
• When the hearer hears the object marker, he thinks, “Oh, I should know what she’s talking about.” If the
speaker hears the Dari equivalent of “I deleted your book [ra] from my Kindle,” then the hearer thinks,
“Oh, I should know what book she’s talking about.” If he doesn’t, he gets confused and says, “Wait,
which book of mine are you talking about?”
Reflect for a moment about the importance of the object marker. If you mess up the verb agreement, you
get something that sounds like, “Ahmad like bananas” instead of “Ahmad likes bananas.” That’s awkward, but
if you mess up the object marker, it’s really confusing. Consider the difference below:
Without the object marker, it’s a totally different sentence. If you’re passing on Ahmad’s thanks for the gift of
a banana, you’d want to say (93a). If you say (93b) instead, the speaker is going to think that Ahmad used to
like bananas, but doesn’t anymore—and conclude from that that the banana was an unwelcome present.
This section has explained when the object marker is used. Probably it didn’t all make sense the first
time round. I recommend that you re-read this section once or twice over the next few days, to rehearse the
concepts.
(94) Alan Paton wrote his first book [ra] while on a trip.
Note that ‘his first book’ describes a specific book, even if the hearer doesn’t happen to know which the book
is. Was it Too Late the Phalarope? Ah, But Your Land is Beautiful? Hofmeyr? It’s not important for the speaker
to know; the important thing is that ‘his first book’ refers to one specific book. Perhaps then it would be
more accurate to say that the object marker marks objects that the hearer could identify, given time and the
opportunity. Here’s another example of that:
Even if the hearer doesn’t happen to know who the tallest member of parliament is, she could figure it out if
she wanted. It’s also important to note that context can provide the listener with the necessary context. Here’s
an example of that:
(96) tʌlɛbʌ ba jak milibas hamla kadan. motarwʌn-a kʊʃtan. . ﻣﻮﺗﺮوان را ﮐﺸﺘﻨﺪ.ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎن ﺑﻪ ﯾﮏ ﻣﯿﻠﯽﺑﺲ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﮐﺮد
‘The Taliban attacked a bus. They killed the driver.’
The use of the object marker on ‘the driver’ is appropriate because the speaker understands automatically who
‘the driver’ is: the driver of the bus. The speaker’s background knowledge about buses—the fact that they only
have one driver—makes ‘the driver’ a specific reference. If you were to swap out ‘the driver’ for some other
type of person, it no longer works:
(97) tʌlɛbʌ ba jak milibas hamla kadan. mʊalɛm-a kʊʃtan. .ﻣﻌﻠﻢ را ﮐﺸﺘﻨﺪ .ﻃﺎﻟﺒﺎن ﺑﻪ ﯾﮏ ﻣﯿﻠﯽﺑﺲ ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﮐﺮد
‘The Taliban attacked a bus. They killed the teacher.’ (Wait, what teacher!?)
Pronouns always get the object marker. This is because when you use a pronoun, it’s because the other
person knows what you are talking about. Every time a pronoun occurs as a direct object, it gets the object
marker. Every time. Here are examples with demonstrative pronouns (‘this’ and ‘that’).
Here are examples with personal pronouns (‘me’, ‘you’, ‘him’, ‘her’...):
Whether or not you think of [xʊd] « »ﺧﻮدas a pronoun, it works the same way: it always gets the object marker.
Noun phrases with ‘this’ or ‘that’ always get the object marker. This makes sense, because it’s always as
if you’re pointing to something with your finger.
5 Just to clarify the logic of this section: the strategy is to describe the use of the object marker in relation to other parts of Dari that
you’re not likely to get wrong. For instance, pronouns always take the object marker. It’s possible to misuse a pronoun, but that’s not
a likely mistake for a new learner of Dari. So, we can use your ability to use pronouns appropriately to get some bootstrap knowledge
about the object marker.
CHAPTER 6. THE OBJECT MARKER 39
Nouns called ‘the best’, ‘the most’, ‘the worst’, ‘the first’, ‘the last’ etc., always get the object marker.
This is because these items are always identifiable by the speaker (at least in principle; see the discussion
above in §6.3.2).
Proper nouns always get the object marker. Since names refer to specific people, names get the object
marker.
Possessed nouns always get the object marker. If a noun is possessed by something (i.e., not just ‘apple’
but ‘Ahmad’s apple’), then that noun always gets the object marker. This is true no matter what the possessor
is: name, pronoun, common noun, pronominal suffix, or whatever.
It may help here to distinguish between possessed nouns (§3.4), and object suffixes (§8.4.1), because they
can sound identical. In (105a) below, the [ɛʃ] is part of a possesive construction: [seb-ɛ xarʌb-ɛʃ] ‘his rotten
apple’. Thus, it received the object marker, because possessed nouns always get the object marker when they’re
direct objects. But in (105b), the [ɛʃ] is a object suffix, and object markers never take the object marker.
The only point here is that you don’t want to form a generalization along the lines of, “If a noun ends in [ɛʃ],
always (or never) use the object marker,” because that won’t hold up.
Expressions with things like ‘all of’, ‘most of’, and ‘one of’ always get the object marker. If you’re
talking about ‘all of them’ then it must be clear what you’re talking about. It may be less obvious that
expressions like ‘most of’ and ‘one of’ are specific references, but apparently they’re specific enough for speakers
of Dari!
Expressions like ‘each other’ or ‘one another’ always get the object marker. These expressions indicate
relationships among a group, which is specific.
Why doesn’t the speaker say anything more about the book? It could be that it’s not important to the story,
or he doesn’t want to admit what book he bought, or for any other reason. The tricky thing is that the object
marker is used, even though the hearer doesn’t know which book it is. It’s as if the speaker introduces ‘a book’
and then immediately refers to it: “There was a book and I bought it.”
The second tricky situation is when we’re talking about ‘no one’ or ‘nothing’. The difficult thing here is
that when the direct object is something concrete, you include the object marker, but not if it’s something
abstract. Here are examples with concrete nouns.6
(109) a. ma ɣair az padar o mʌdar hetʃ kase-ra nadʌrum .ﻣﻦ ﻏﯿﺮ از ﭘﺪر و ﻣﺎدر ﻫﯿﭻ ﮐﺴﯽ را ﻧﺪارم
‘Apart from my mother and father I don’t have anybody.’7
b. ma hetʃ seb-a naxordʊm .ﻣﻦ ﻫﯿﭻ ﺳﯿﺐ را ﻧﺨﻮردم
‘I didn’t eat any apples.’8
On the other hand, if the noun is abstract, the object marker is not used:
The third tricky situation when we speak generically, that is, when we talk about things in general.9 The
examples below are about how vinegar curdles milk in general, and how wolves kill sheep in general.
6 Inexample (109), it is better to use the object marker, though it also seems possible to leave it out.
7 This example is from Roberts (2009, p. 170)
8 This example is a little complicated because [hetʃ] can also be interpretted as an adverb. This sentence can then also mean, “I didn’t
These examples are about milk and sheep in general. We’re not talking about specific milk and sheep, but
about the ideal forms of milk and sheep. It’s a bit of a philosophical discussion how these examples differ from
the ones, e.g., in (85), but you can be fully assured that the difference is there!
On the other hand, since the sentences in (111) have the object marker, they can also be interpreted as
being about specific things. “Hey, what curdled this milk?” “Vinegar curdled the milk.” “What’s going on the
meadow?” “Wolves are killing the sheep.”
Confused? What a wonderful segue to the next section, which has some concrete suggestions for learning
how to use the object marker properly.
10 Examples: “I walk into a bookstore and I’m looking for a book, but I’m not sure what book I want. What do I say?” “I walk into a
bookstore and I’m looking for a book, and I know which book, but I don’t want to say the name of it right away. What do I say?” “I walk
into a bookstore and want to tell the owner to sell me the book we had talked about yesterday. What do I say?” And so forth. If that
sounds like a fun language lesson, you may want to consider a career in linguistics.
Chapter 7
Prepositions
Dari prepositions work much the same way that English prepositions do. Rather than a formal definition of a
preposition, then, it might be helpful to look at some examples:
Do not memorize the meanings of prepositions. The Haim dictionary defines [ba] « »ﺑﻪas “to, at, by, with,
in, against”. Writing all that out on the back of a flashcard is a good way to waste time and drive yourself
crazy. The best way to get a start on prepositions is using a Total Physical Response method. For instance,
your teacher could give you a plastic apple and tell you to place it on the table, under the table, next to the
table, close to the table, far from the table, etc. That way, you learn how the prepositions correspond to reality,
rather than how they correspond to English. You’ll pick up further usages from stories, as described below.
Do not expect Dari prepositions to correspond one-to-one with English prepositions, because they
don’t. Just as you can’t define a Dari preposition with English prepositions, you can’t go the other way and
translate English prepositions into Dari. This is where it is very important to learn Dari naturally, rather than
trying to translate from English to Dari.
1 Well, almost always. Don’t worry about that for the moment; we’ll come back to it in §7.4.
42
CHAPTER 7. PREPOSITIONS 43
Learn how to say things. That’s not bad advice for learning language in general, is it? What it means in this
context is that you want to learn how to say certain things. “How do I say that I gave something to someone?”
“How do I say that I said something to someone?” The answer to these questions is below.
(113) a. ma [bare ahmad] seb dʌdʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮای اﺣﻤﺪ ﺳﯿﺐ دادم
‘I gave Ahmad an apple.’
b. ma [bare ahmad] gʊftʊm ke mijʌjʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮای اﺣﻤﺪ ﮔﻔﺘﻢ ﮐﻪ ﻣﯽآﯾﻢ
‘I told Ahmad that I’m coming.’
In this case, in both cases you would use the preposition [bare] «»ﺑﺮای. This doesn’t mean that [bare] «»ﺑﺮای
means ‘to’. (In fact, ‘for’ is probably the closest English equivalent.) But that’s not important. The important
thing is to know how to express who you gave something to, or who you said something to.
Generalize slowly. There’s a lot of arbitrarieness with prepositions. From you above you might have guessed
that [bare] « »ﺑﺮایis used when you’re describing who benefits from or receives an action. That’s more or less
correct, and it will help you to guess correctly sometimes. But that doesn’t mean you should always use it.
When you’re helping someone, you don’t use [bare] « »ﺑﺮایbut [hamrʌjɛ] «»ﻫﻤﺮاه. Why? Just because.
(114) ma [hamrʌjɛ ahmad] kʊmak kadʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﺮاه اﺣﻤﺪ ﮐﻤﮏ ﮐﺮدم
‘I helped Ahmad.’ (Lit. ‘I helped with Ahmad.’)
Therefore, you should focus on learning particular expressions. As discussed further in §8.4, many verbs
require certain prepositions. You really need to learn the short phrase, rather than just the word. For instance,
you could learn ‘to help someone’ as [hamrʌjɛ X kʊmak kardan].
Example (114) also illustrates how poorly English and Dari prepositions line up. A literal translation of the
sentence is ‘I helped with Ahmad’, which in English sounds like Ahmad was a baby you were taking care of:
quite a different meaning.
Others are less transparent, like [bare], which is a shortened form of [ba rʌh-ɛ] ‘to the road’—which, with
a lot of imagination, you can imagine meaning ‘for’.
This would be an academic discussion, except for what we’re going to learn in the next section. The are
two things to help you figure out the differences here:
1. Proper prepositions never take the ezafa (i.e., they always end in [ɛ]). Noun-propositions always take the
ezafa.
2. Proper prepositions are always one syllable. Noun-prepositions are always two or more syllables.3
2 And if that’s not enough detail for you: [hamrʌh] is a compound word: [ham] ‘same’ + [rʌh] ‘road’. A ‘companion’ is a ‘same-road’.
3 Careful with this one. When [rujɛ] is said quickly, it comes out as [ruj], and in that case you just have to believe that deep down it’s
really two syllables.
CHAPTER 7. PREPOSITIONS 44
(117) a. ma bare ahmad seb dʌdʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮای اﺣﻤﺪ ﺳﯿﺐ دادم
‘I gave Ahmad an apple.’
b. ma barɛʃ seb dʌdʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﺑﺮاﯾﺶ ﺳﯿﺐ دادم
‘I gave him an apple.’
(118) a. ma hamrʌjɛ ahmad kʊmak kadʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﺮاه اﺣﻤﺪ ﮐﻤﮏ ﮐﺮدم
‘I helped Ahmad.’
b. ma hamrʌjɛʃ kʊmak kadʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﻫﻤﺮاﻫﺶ ﮐﻤﮏ ﮐﺮدم
‘I helped him.’
You cannot do this with a proper preposition. You always have to use the full noun phrase in that case. Put
differently, if a preposition ends in [ɛ], you can shorten it by using the possessive suffix as the object of the
preposition.
(119) a. ma ɣair-ɛ seb mewa xʊʃ nadʌrum. .ﻣﻦ ﻏﯿﺮ ﺳﯿﺐ ﻣﯿﻮه ﺧﻮش ﻧﺪارم
‘Apart from apples, I don’t like fruit.’
b. ma ɣair az seb mewa xʊʃ nadʌrum. .ﻣﻦ ﻏﯿﺮ از ﺳﯿﺐ ﻣﯿﻮه ﺧﻮش ﻧﺪارم
‘Apart from apples, I don’t like fruit.’
c. ma da ɣair az seb mewa xʊʃ nadʌrum. .ﻣﻦ دز ﻏﯿﺮ از ﺳﯿﺐ ﻣﯿﻮه ﺧﻮش ﻧﺪارم
‘Apart from apples, I don’t like fruit.’
People’s inclination to do this seems to vary by region, and may also be a matter of personal style. Your
best bet is to imitate the usage of your peers.
The meaning doesn’t make much sense to Dari speakers either. So, sometimes these get interpreted as a single
verb [barʌmadan], rather than as a compound verb. As you can see below, this doesn’t make a difference in
the past tense, but in the present tense the mi suffix goes at the very front.
Verbs
46
Chapter 8
This chapter provides a big-picture view of how Dari verbs work. Or, less ambitiously, it’s a dumping ground
of useful information about Dari verbs. If you have a working knowledge of Dari, this chapter can help you
to systematize your knowledge and pin down some loose ends. If you’re new to Dari, it would not be a good
idea to read this straight through.
If you’re going through the Growing Participator Approach, you can use the following as a rough guide for
when to study each section of this chapter. Learning about how every verb has two stems (§8.1) will become
important in Phase 2, and probably around that time as well it would be helpful to know about compound
verbs (§8.3), and how verbs can take direct objects, prepositions, or both (§8.4). The subject agreement system
(§8.2) is quite basic; you’ll almost certainly have figured it out before picking up this book. You can safely
delay learning about the active and passive (§8.6) until Phase 3, and your anxiety about meaning and usage
(§8.7) will probably rise at about that time as well.
(123) Illustration of the two stems for the verb ‘to carry’
a. ma aw me-bar-ʊm .ﻣﻦ آب ﻣﯽﺑﺮم
‘I am carrying water.’
b. ma aw me-bʊrd-ʊm .ﻣﻦ آب ﻣﯽﺑﺮدم
‘I carried water.’
(124) Illustration of the two stems for the verb ‘to sell’
a. mʌ seb me-fʊruʃ-em .ﻣﺎ ﺳﯿﺐ ﻣﯽﻓﺮوﺷﯿﻢ
‘We are selling apples.’
b. mʌ seb me-fʊruxt-em .ﻣﺎ ﺳﯿﺐ ﻣﯽﻓﺮوﺧﺘﯿﻢ
‘We were selling apples.’
When you learn a new verb, you need to learn both the present tense stem and the past tense stem. You
can’t usually predict one from the other. There are a few consistent patterns, which can help you to learn new
verbs, but you still need to memorize both stems.1 In the examples above, the only difference between the
verbs is which stem appears ([bar] or [bʊrd], or [fʊruʃ] or [fʊruxt]). There is more to it than that usually. In
later chapters we will see that different tenses are made with either the present stem or the past stem, plus
different prefixes and suffixes. Recognizing a stem as present or past is only a part of identifying the tense of
the verb.
1 One pattern, for instance, is that past stems that end in [xt] often have present stems that are the same except that the end in [z].
For instance, «[ »ﺳﺎﺧﺖsʌxt] and «[ »ﺳﺎزsʌz] for ‘to make’, and «[ »اﻧﺪاﺧﺖandʌxt] and «[ »اﻧﺪازandʌz] for ‘to pour.’ These are not absolute,
however. For instance, the past stem for ‘to sell’ is «[ »ﻓﺮوﺧﺖfʊruxt], but the present stem is «[ »ﻓﺮوشfʊruʃ].
47
CHAPTER 8. HOW DARI VERBS WORK 48
If every verb has two stems, what do you look up in the dictionary? In Dari dictionaries, verbs are listed
in the infinitive. The infinitive is perfectly consistent: it is formed from the past stem plus [an]. To get the
infinitive of ‘to carry’, for instance, we add [an] onto the end of the past tense stem, [bʊrd] «»ﺑﺮد: [bʊrdan]
«»ﺑﺮدن. To get the infinitive for ‘to sell’, add [an] to the past stem, [fʊruxt]: [fʊruxtan] «»ﻓﺮوﺧنت. There are
no exceptions to this rule.2 If you are reading and see the form «»ﺑﺮد, you look for the form «»ﺑﺮدن. A good
dictionary will also include entries for the present stem. For instance, if you read « »ﻣﯽﻓﺮوﺷﯿﻢthere ought to be
an entry for «»ﻓﺮوش, which will point you to the entry «»ﻓﺮوﺧنت.
In Dari, the endings in the verb endings change a little more than that. The paradigms for the verb ‘to come’
are shown in Paradigm 8.1 for the present tense, and Paradigm 8.2 for the past tense. Remember from the last
section that every Dari verb has two stems. The present tense stem for ‘to come’ is seen in Paradigm 8.1; it is
[ʌj].3 The past tense stem, [ʌmad], is seen in Paradigm 8.2.
The verb endings are pretty much the same between the past and the present, with the exception of the
‘he/she/it’ ending. In the past tense, there is no ending; in the present tense, it is [a].
It’s quite likely that by the time you pick up this book you will have encountered these verb endings. These
are not conceptually difficult, but it important for you to internalize them. For a ‘mechanical’ pattern like
this one, repeating paradigms might be the best way to go. You want to be in a place where the correct verb
ending comes out naturally, just because it sounds right that way.
adjective plus a ‘light verb’. What this means in practice is that you can take just about any word, add the
verb [kadan] («)»ﮐﺮدن, and make a new verb.4
The possibilities here are pretty much endless. Many verbs—probably, most verbs—are formed on this very
pattern. The convenient thing is that when you use a different tense, [kadan] changes all on its own. Here are
the same verbs in the simple past:
You just put in the appropriate form of [kadan], and the rest is the same. This means that you’ll get a lot
of practice with the verb [kadan], and that practice will help you to use a lot of verbs fluently.
As the literal translations in the examples above show, you need to be a little flexible in thinking about
the meaning. Don’t get bogged down asking yourself questions like, “Is sleep really something you do?” The
‘light verb’ contributes little or no meaning. The examples above all use the verb [kadan] ‘to do’, which is
indeed the most common light verb. Other verbs get used as well, however. The next most common light
verb is probably [dʌdan] «‘ »دادنto give’. The ‘literal’ translation can make even less sense with this verb. For
example, a verb meaning ‘to move, transport’ is [ɛtɛqʌl dʌdan]:
Why use a light verb meaning ‘to give’ for this meaning? There’s no particular reason. It’s not as if Dari
speakers have some profoundly different understanding of what it means to move a sanduq. Two verbs that
both mean ‘to attack’, for instance are [hamla kadan] « »ﺣﻤﻠﻪ ﮐﺮدنand [hʊdʒum ʌwʊrdan] «»ﻫﺠﻮم آوردن. One uses
[kadan] ‘to do’ and the other uses [ʌwʊrdan] ‘to bring’. It makes no difference to the meaning of the verb.
Sometimes it makes more sense. For instance, [zadan] «‘ »زدنto hit’ is used in the verbs meaning ‘to slap’ and
‘to punch’. In that case, the light verb ‘to hit’ may serve as a mnemonic to help you remember the meanings
of words.
4 This is a slight exaggeration, but only a slight one!
CHAPTER 8. HOW DARI VERBS WORK 50
There are two ways to tell that [ma] is the direct object in the sentence above. The first is that it has the object
marker [ra]. If you see the object marker, then it is definitely a direct object. Some direct objects don’t take
the object marker, however (see Chapter 6 for more on this). So the second way is more reliable: observing
that there’s no preposition. Many verbs just take a direct object, but other verbs can take prepositional phrases
as well. Here is an example of a verb that takes a prepositional phrase:
The way that you express the person with whom Ahmad is speaking is with the phrase [hamrʌh-ɛ X] ‘with X’.
Here is another (more violent) example:
In this example, the person who is attacked is shown with [ba X] ‘to X’. In the next example, we see that some
verbs can take a direct object and a prepositional phrase:
Sometimes the prepositions will make sense because they’re very close to English. The Dari sentence
[ahmad hamrʌh-ɛ ma gap mezana] matches the English sentence “Ahmad is speaking with me” almost word-
for-word. Others are less transparent. We don’t say “Ahmad attacked to me” in English. You just have to
memorize those.
As a practical matter, this means that when you learn new verbs, you should memorize them in a little
phrase or template. For instance, if you use flashcards, it would be a good idea to write out the patterns as
shown below.
A good dictionary, by the way, will help you out here. The Farhang-e Moaser, for instance, provides a list
of the patterns above under many of its verbs.
CHAPTER 8. HOW DARI VERBS WORK 51
The object suffix works just like the possessive suffix, in that it has to match the person and number of the
object. Above ‘it’ is a third person singular, so it takes [ɛʃ]. If the object were ‘you’, then you would use the
second person singular suffix:5
With compound verbs (§8.3), the object suffix can either go on the light verb or on the other part, as seen
in (137c) and (137d) below.
Since object suffixes aren’t part of English grammar, you’re likely to forget to use them. Listen for them in
other people’s speech, and imitate their style.
5 See §8.2 or Chapter 4 of you need help on first person singular, second person singular, etc. It’s not just jargon; it’s important for
(140) unʌ hetʃ pɛlʌn-e dʒur na-kad-an .آﻧﻬﺎ ﻫﯿﭻ ﭘﻼﻧﯽ ﺟﻮر ﻧﮑﺮدﻧﺪ
‘They didn’t make any plan.’
The first is an active sentence; the second is a passive sentence. Active sentences emphasize the person
who is acting (above, ‘I’); passive sentences emphasize the thing that is affected (above, ‘the work’).
As you can see, the difference is that we swap out the verb [kadan] ‘to do’ with the verb [ʃʊdan] ‘to become.’
If we start with the verb [xalʌs kadan], the passive verb is [xalʌs ʃʊdan]. Since [kʌr] is now the subject, the
verb agrees with it (i.e., it has the third person singular ending). Since most verbs involve [kadan] ‘to do’,
most verbs are made passive in this way. There are three other patterns as well, though.
Verbs with the light verb [zadan] ‘to hit’ are sometimes made passive by swapping out [xʊrdan] for [zadan].
Verbs formed with the verb [dʌdan] ‘to give’ are sometimes made passive by swapping out [dʌdan] for
[gɛrɛftan].
Other light verbs can be swapped out as well, but these are the most common ones.
There is one pattern remaining. For verbs where there is no pattern of swapping out the light verbs,
you make a passive with the participle plus [ʃʊdan]. For now, it’s sufficient to say that the participle is the
infinitive, minus [n]. For the verb [gʊftan] ‘to say’, the participle is [gʊfta].6 So, the passive of [gʊftan] is
[gʊfta ʃʊdan].
(145) a. ahmad mega ke nasim tambal as .اﺣﻤﺪ ﻣﯽﮔﻮﯾﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻧﺴﯿﻢ ﺗﻨﺒﻞ اﺳﺖ
‘Ahmed says that Nasim is lazy.’
b. gʊfta meʃa ke nasim tambal as .ﮔﻔﺘﻪ ﻣﯽﺷﻮد ﮐﻪ ﻧﺴﯿﻢ ﺗﻨﺒﻞ اﺳﺖ
‘It is said that Nasim is lazy.’
This pattern even extends to compound verbs that use [dʌdan] ‘to give’ and [zadan] ‘to hit’. Below there is an
example where the passive of [pas dʌdan] ‘to give back’ is [pas dʌda ʃʊdan] instead of [pas gɛrɛftan].
6 For more information about participles, see Chapter 21.
CHAPTER 8. HOW DARI VERBS WORK 53
An example with [zadan] comes from a news headline. [aqab zadan] means ‘to drive back’.7 The passive is
[aqab zada ʃʊdan] instead of [aqab xʊrdan].
(147) a. askarʌ hamalʌt-ɛ dʊʃman aqab zadan .اﺳﮑﺮﻫﺎ ﺣﻤﻼت دﺷﻤﻦ ﻋﻘﺐ زدﻧﺪ
‘The soldiers beat back an enemy attack.’
b. hamalʌt-ɛ dʊʃman aqab zada ʃʊd ﺣﻤﻼت دﺷﻤﻦ ﻋﻘﺐ زده ﺷﺪ
‘An enemy attack was beaten back.’
For compound verbs with [dʌdan] ‘to give’ and [zadan] ‘to hit’ then, you can just learn the passive form if and
when it becomes important.
To summarize, a passive in Dari is formed in one of the following ways.
1. Compound verbs are made passive by swapping out the light verb.
a. If the light verb is [kadan], switch it to [ʃʊdan].
b. If the light verb is [zadan], sometimes switch it to [xʊrdan].
c. If the light verb is [dʌdan], sometimes switch it to [gɛrɛftan].
d. (There are other less common ones as well.)
2. Otherwise, place the participle of the verb before [ʃʊdan].
There is one final thing to note about the passive. Passives are often used an a situation where you don’t
want to say who did something, or don’t know who did it. If, on the other hand, you want to specify who did
it, you can include that with the preposition [az] «»از:
8.7 Form/Meaning/Usage
Later chapters of the book describe the various tenses of Dari. For each of these tenses, you need to be
thinking about three different things: the form, the meaning, and the usage. The form of the verb is a simple
little formula to show how the tense is made out of prefixes, a stem, and suffixes. For instance, the form of
the simple past is simply:
These differences are very difficult to explain; they may be impossible to explain in a helpful way. It may
even be that a mature student of Dari should work with a few generalizations, and then hard-earned knowledge
of a lot of exceptions. Here is another example. Recently I was discussing with my chaokidar why the gas to
our stove was weak. I said,
Both in terms of grammar and meaning, both ways of saying this are correct. No ambiguity is possible with
either phrasing. Yet, the native speaker clearly prefers the past perfect in this context. This is purely a matter
of usage.
The challenge in mastering usage is that there won’t be a simple explanation of which tense is used in
exactly which context. It’s matter of style, just like a speaker of English knows that both of the following
expressions are grammatical, but the second one sounds a little more natural.
To throw a further spanner into the works, use of one tense instead of another depends on cultural
knowledge. The examples below are in English, but it works the same way in Dari.
A moment’s reflection will show you that these questions, which are grammatically identical, are asking about
very different time spans. “Have you eaten lunch?” has to mean, “Have you eaten lunch today?” On the
other hand, “Have you gone on the Hajj?” has to mean, “Have you gone on the Hajj ever?” That is because
having lunch is a daily activity, whereas going on the Hajj is a once-in-a-lifetime activity. So culture comes
into proper use of tense as well. Someone who doesn’t know what the Hajj is might interpret the question as
being about today.9
How will you ever learn the proper context in which to use the various tenses? The only solution is to flood
your brain with Dari language and culture input, and to let the intuitions develop naturally over time. This
may seem to be the counsel of despair, but it’s really just one more example of how a grammar book cannot
be a substitute for time spent in the language!
9 And you can imagine how this might vary place to place. Perhaps people who live in Mecca go on the Hajj every year; in that situation
the question might mean, “Have you gone on the Hajj yet this year?”
Chapter 9
Is & Was
This chapter introduces the verb ‘to be’ (‘is’ and ‘was’). The meaning should be pretty easy, though as with
many language, there are some irregularities with the way that these verbs work.
9.1 Form
9.1.1 Present tense (‘is’)
The agreement in these copulas is pretty much the same as the usual Dari verb agreement, which is explained
in §8.2. The only difference is that there is no ending for ‘he/she/it’ in either the past or the present.
When these forms come after a vowel, it is common for the [a] in [ast] to drop out. This doesn’t change
the meaning at all.
Getting rid of vowels can create ambiguity, of course. The sentences below—from a perennial lunchtime joke
at IAM’s Mazar office—differ only in where the stress goes.
55
CHAPTER 9. IS & WAS 56
Sometimes instead of [ast], speakers say [hast] «»ﻫﺴﺖ. (If you’re learning a dialect of Dari where the [h] is
routinely dropped, like Kabuli Dari, then you can ignore this bit.) The use of this variant is not easily defined,
so you might just think about the suggestions below, and then see if they line up with what you hear people
saying. Thackston describes several contexts in which this occurs (Thackston, 1993, pp. 28, 208). Two of
these seem important for Dari. The first usage of [hast] is to say that there is something.
Alternately, one educated speaker has suggested that, as a matter of grammatical correctness in formal
Dari, [hast] is used for living things (i.e., people and animals). In that case, it would be correct to use [hast]
for ‘man’ above, but not for ‘tea’.
Dari has a special word for the negative forms (i.e., ‘isn’t’): [nest] «»ﻧﯿﺴﺖ, as shown in Paradigm 9.2.
9.2 Usage
Dari usage of ‘to be’ is very similar to English, so your intuitions will mostly be correct. There are a few
differences, though, to do with singular and plural nouns. The first difference is that when you say “A is B,”
then ‘B’ is always singular, no matter whether ‘A’ is singular or plural:
The second difference is that you use the singular form of the verb when you’re talking about non-human
things, even if there is more than one. The first example below, (159a), has a human subject (a teacher), but
the others are all non-human.
Commands
Go!
There are two types of commands in Dari. The first is the polite form, the second is... not impolite exactly, but
more familiar and less formal. Explaining the different forms is simple. Saying when to use them is probably
not possible.
10.1 Form
10.1.1 Informal
Grammar Formula—Positive
In the diagram above, the subj prefix is shown in parentheses to show that it is sometimes left out. Aside
from some irregular forms (discussed below), it is typically included in spoken Dari; in written Dari it is more
common to see it left out.
Grammar Formula—Negative
There are a number of irregular command forms, which are described in §10.1.3. As always, it’s only the
most frequent verbs that have irregular forms.
58
CHAPTER 10. COMMANDS: GO! 59
10.1.2 Formal
Grammar Formula—Positive
Grammar Formula—Negative
You may notice that the form of the formal command is identical to the present subjunctive, as described
in Chapter 17. That’s not a coincidence. Dari’s use of the subjunctive for a command is perhaps similar to
how we would ask very politely in English, “Would you shut the door?” or simply (in a certain tone of voice)
“If you would shut the door...”
As discussed in Chapter 9, the present stem of ‘to be’ is really [bʌʃ] «»ﺑﺎش. Given that, the command forms
of ‘to be’ below are regular, but you’ll probably need to pay special attention to them.
The verb ‘to have’, which admittedly is not used as a command form very often, also has exceptional forms.1
10.2 Usage
The big question is when to use the informal commands and when to use the formal commands. The broader
issue here is the difference between [tu] « »ﺗﻮand [ʃʊmʌ] «»ﺷام. The former is the more familiar form of ‘you.’
The latter is used for addressing multiple people, and also when you want to show respect to someone (or to
speak more formally). If you’re on [tu] « »ﺗﻮterms with someone, the informal command may be appropriate.
If you’re using [ʃʊmʌ] «»ﺷام, the formal command may be more appropriate. Here are some things to consider.
• Use of informal commands can be a way to talk down to people. If, like many foreigners, you are
ostentatiously rich and powerful, you may want to consider carefully whether you use the informal style
when speaking to employees.
• On the other hand, the informal command can also show familiarity. If someone uses [tu] « »ﺗﻮwith you,
perhaps you should reciprocate.
• Context can be a guide. You may typically use [ʃʊmʌ] « »ﺷامas a matter of habit, but slip in an informal
command if you’re making a joke, for instance.
• Some situations are inherently informal. If you’re shopping in the bazaar, you’re not going to hear a lot
of formal commands.
• Use informal commands freely with children. Use formal commands with older people.
It’s important to know as well that some people always use [ʃʊmʌ] «( »ﺷامand therefore the formal commands),
and therefore may not want to teach [tu] «»ﺗﻮ. You should take your teacher’s opinion into account when
making decisions about which form to use.
10.3 Practice
1. Shut the door! (plural)
2. Answer my question! (singular)
Simple Present
I’m going
The simple present is the usual tense for speaking about the present or the future.
11.1 Form
Grammar Formula—Positive
The present is formed with the mi prefix. This prefix doesn’t really have a consistent meaning, so it is
identified here just as mi.1 An example sentence is below; a full paradigm is given in Paradigm 11.1.
Recall from §8.1 that the present stem of a verb is different from the past stem (which looks like the
infinitive), and has to be learned separately. There is no way, for instance, to tell that the present tense stem
of the verb «[ »رﻓنتraftan] is [r].
1 Some people will analyze mi as indicating continuous activity since it’s used in the simple present and the past continuous
(e.g., Glassman, 2000, p. 131; Thackston, 1993, p. 41), but it’s also used in the past subjunctive without a necessarily continuous meaning.
61
CHAPTER 11. SIMPLE PRESENT: I’M GOING 62
Grammar Formula—Negative
The negative form of this is just like the positive, but with the [na] neg prefix added at the beginning. An
example sentence is below; a full paradigm for negative forms is given in Paradigm 11.2.
As discussed in §2.3.2, the stress goes on the first prefix of the word. This means that for positive forms,
the stress goes on mi, and for negative forms, the stress goes on neg.
11.1.1 Pronunciation of mi
The mi prefix is generally pronounced consistently—either as [me] or [mi], depending on where you are in
the country. A consistent exception is with verbs whose present stems start with [a], in which case the vowels
get smooshed together into [ɛ]:
11.2 Meaning
The present tense is used to express an ongoing activity in the present, to express repetititve actions, and to
talk about the future. This is basically identical to English usage, which makes this a short chapter. The two
examples below show the possible interpretations of the present.
11.3 Practice
Produce the following sentences in Dari.
Simple Past
I went
The simple past is the usual tense for speaking about events in the past.
12.1 Form
Grammar Formula—Positive
Recall from §8.1 that verbs have two stems, past and present, that have to be learned separately. If you’re
following the GPA approach, you started encountering past stems when you moved out of the “here-and-now”
phase and into simple stories.
As discussed in §8.2, the verb agrees with the subject. The agreement markers work just as they do for the
present tense, with one wrinkle: for the 3sg (he/she/it) there is no personal ending, just the plain past stem.
(See §8.2 for more.)
The positive and negative forms differ only in the presence of the neg prefix. A full paradigm is given for
positive forms in Paradigm 12.1, and for the negative forms in Paradigm 12.2. The latter paradigm illustrates
a little variation in the neg prefix. When a past stem ends in a vowel, the [a] in the negative prefix goes away
in colloqiual Dari; in formal Dari it’s preserved by inserting [j].
64
CHAPTER 12. SIMPLE PAST: I WENT 65
Grammar Formula—Negative
12.2 Meaning
The simple past is used for events that took place in the past, and past events can be described using the simple
past. Present events should not be indicated with the simple past, nor should repetitive events, nor events that
might have happened in the past but you’re not certain. Describing future events with the past is right out.
There’s really not much more to say. The only real difference in usage is that the simple past is used in
some contexts that it wouldn’t be in English, for instance in newspaper headlines, and in some proverbs.
12.3 Practice
1. Aziz said he was ready.
Past Continuous
I was going
The past continuous is used to describe past events that were ongoing or repetitive. The hardest thing about
the past continuous is probably its name. This tense is just the Dari equivalent to the English: “We were
going.” The usage is either very close or identical to English usage.
13.1 Form
Grammar Formula—Positive
As you can see, the form of the past continuous is sort of in between the simple past and the present. You
can think of it as the simple past with the mi prefix stuck on the front of it, or as a present but with the past
stem instead of the present stem.1 As you can see below, the negative works the usual way, with the neg
prefix stuck to the beginning of the word.
Grammar Formula—Negative
We’ll see in Chapter 18 that the form of the past continuous is identical to the form of the past subjunctive.
1 The fact that both the present and the past continuous have the mi prefix is one reason to think that mi makes the verb continuous.
This doesn’t really hold up in the whole language, but it might be a helpful to think that way for the moment.
66
CHAPTER 13. PAST CONTINUOUS: I WAS GOING 67
13.2 Meaning
The typical way to talk about an past event in Dari is with the simple past (Chapter 12), as we see below.
Dari also has the equivalent of, “He was shutting the door.” But as in English, you don’t usually just say that.
It’s more common to use the past continuous when you’re setting the scene for some other action:
(171) u darwʌza-ra basta mekad, waxtɛ ke ʌmadem. .او دروازه را ﺑﺴﺘﻪ ﻣﯽﮐﺮد وﻗﺘﯽ ﮐﻪ آﻣﺪﯾﻢ
‘He was shutting the door when we came.’
The past continous can also be used to show that an event was ongoing or continuous.
(172) kʊlɛ ruz da xʌna budem. ma kʌr mekadʊm. tɛflʌ bʌzi mekadan.
. ﻃﻔﻞﻫﺎ ﺑﺎزی ﻣﯽﮐﺮدﻧﺪ. ﻣﻦ ﮐﺎر ﻣﯽﮐﺮدم.ﮐﻞ روز در ﺧﺎﻧﻪ ﺑﻮدﯾﻢ
‘We were in the house all day. I was working. The children were playing.’
13.3 Practice
1. I was working in Kabul in the time of the dinosaurs.
2. Did you (pl.) used to eat dinosaur in England?
Future
I will go
There are a couple of interesting things about the future tense in Dari. The first is that future events are
generally not described with the future tense! It’s far more common to use the simple present to talk about
the future (as it is in English: “I’m going to Kabul”, etc.; see Chapter 11 for the simple present). So you
may go quite a while before hearing an actual future tense. The other interesting thing about the future is
there are considerable differences between the colloquial and formal forms. There are always differences of
pronunciation between formal and informal Dari, but these changes are more than usual; in addition, the
meaning is somewhat different as well. As a result, in this chapter the formal and colloquial variants are
treated completely separately. If you’re focusing on the spoken language, feel free to ignore the written forms
for now.
The way to form the future in spoken Dari is to place the word [xʌt] right before the verb, which is in the
simple past or subjunctive (Glassman, 2000, p. 261).
If the verb is a compound verb, the [xʌt] is (typically) placed right before the light verb:
68
CHAPTER 14. FUTURE: I WILL GO 69
In fact, there’s a good deal of flexibility in where to put the [xʌt]. A safe set is to place it right before the
light verb, but you can see some flexibility below.
Going even further, it seems that any of the sentences below are acceptable Dari versions of, “Tomorrow I will
wash the chair for Ahmad.”
In spite of the freedom you have here, you’re never going to go wrong placing the [xʌt] right before the main
verb of the sentence, as in (176d)—or right before the light verb if it’s a compound verb. It’s probably best to
practice using [xʌt] in that position, though you should be prepared to understand it in any position.
For the negative, you again have options. You can place the neg prefix before the [xʌt], or you can place it
directly onto the verb (or light verb in a compound verb). The preferred option is to place neg on the [xʌt].1
A paradigm for the negative form of the colloquial future is given in Paradigm 14.2.
14.1.2 Meaning
The future is used to talk about events that take place in the future—except of course that it’s much more
common to use the simple present to talk about the future! In colloquial Dari, there is a slight difference
between using the simple present to talk about the future, and a [xʌt] form. The following examples are from
Glassman (2000, p. 261). Example (177a), a simple present, is strongly confident. Examples (177b) and (177c)
are less confident—90-95%, according to the people I’ve spoken with.
1 The grammar formula shows options using the past tense variant, but this is not necessary. Strictly speaking there are four options
for the negative future: placing [xʌt] in one of two places, and using either the simple past or subjunctive.
CHAPTER 14. FUTURE: I WILL GO 70
Paradigm 14.2: Negative colloquial future forms of the verb ‘to come’.
It should be noted, though, that both (177b) and (177c) are ‘stronger’ than if you were to use [ʃʌjad] «»ﺷﺎﯾﺪ
‘perhaps’ with the subjunctive (as discussed in Chapter 17).
14.2.1 Form
The written form of the future is quite different, as shown below.2 A full paradigm is given in Paradigm 14.3.
Grammar Formula—Positive
The formula above doesn’t show how compound verbs work (see §8.3 for more on compound verbs). The
[xwʌh]-part goes between the light verb and the other part:
(179) hamalʌt-ɛ dʊʃman aqab zada xwʌhad ʃʊd ﺣﻤﻼت دﺷﻤﻦ ﻋﻘﺐ زده ﺧﻮاﻫﺪ ﺷﺪ
‘An enemy attack will be beaten back.’
For negatives, the neg is stuck onto the [xwʌh]-part. A full paradigm for negative forms is given in Paradigm 14.4.
Grammar Formula—Negative
14.2.2 Meaning
In formal Dari, the future simply refers to future events. The shades of meaning in the colloquial version are
not part of formal Dari.
14.3 Practice
Many of these sentences could be expressed very well in the present continuous tense, but for our purposes
here, please produce these sentences with the [xʌt] construction that was presented in this chapter.
4. Next year the little goat will kick the big goat.
5. In ten years, I will go to France.
Present Perfect
I have gone
The present perfect is used to talk about events that are complete in the present—the term ‘perfect’ is used in
the sense of ‘complete’. This works much as it does in English. In the example below, the action of shutting
the door is complete.
The meaning and usage of the perfect is discussed in further detail below.
15.1 Form
15.1.1 Spoken
The spoken form of the present perfect works a bit differently from the other tenses. In the first place, the
stress always goes on the last syllable. This is different to the way that all other verbs work (see §2.3). In
fact, stress is all that distinguishes many present perfects from the corresponding simple pasts. Compare the
paradigm for the present perfects in Paradigm 15.1 with their simple past forms. Aside from stress, there are
the following differences:
• The 1sg and 1pl forms (‘I’ and ‘we’) are identical. The ending is [ém] in both cases.
• The 3sg (‘he/she/it’) ends in [á] (instead of having no ending).
15.1.2 Formal
The formal forms are a bit more straightforward. The present perfect in that case is the participle plus a
personal ending. According to your preference, you can think of the participle as the past stem plus [a], or as
the infinitive minus the [n]; it works out to the same thing.1
1 See Chapter 21 for more on participles. There’s nothing that’s really relevant to the current chapter there, however.
72
CHAPTER 15. PRESENT PERFECT: I HAVE GONE 73
Refer to Paradigm 15.2 for the formal forms; note that for this paradigm the written forms reflect the
spoken forms. In the 3sg forms (‘he/she/it’), the verb ‘is’ sometimes follows. This may make the sentence for
emphatic.
Grammar Formula—Positive
For the negative, the neg marker goes right at the beginning.
Grammar Formula—Negative
15.2 Meaning
The important thing is to distinguish the simple past and the present perfect. Consider the sentences below.
Both the Dari and the English translations work much the same way.
CHAPTER 15. PRESENT PERFECT: I HAVE GONE 74
What’s the difference between two sentences? Before we answer that, consider that even if you can’t answer
that question, you can at least observe that the English sentences are different. If you use a present perfect in
Dari when you would use one in English, that’s at least a start.
So what is the difference? Grammatically (182a) is a simple past, and (182b) is a present perfect. If I said
to you, “I shut the door,” then all I am saying is that at some point I shut the door. I’m not taking responsibility
for whether the door is still shut. On the other hand, if I say, “I have shut the door,” then there is a strong
implication that the door is still shut—perhaps I’ve just come from there, and there’s no one else who could
have opened it.
Since perfect means ‘complete’, these are all obviously actions that have taken place in the past. But when
you use a perfect, you’re giving the listener an extra clue: this happened in the past, it is still finished (or not),
and that’s relevant to our discussion.
In §8.7, I contrasted the meaning of the following sentences, both of which are in the perfect.
Both refer to ‘completed’ actions. But if I say that I’ve eaten lunch, you naturally interpret it as referring to
today. If I say I’ve gone on the Hajj—which is generally a once-in-a-lifetime thing—then it’s only understood
that I went at some time in the past—maybe even decades ago.
Of course, you can also use the perfect to talk about things that have not happened.
15.3 Practice
1. I have slaughtered the dinosaur.
2. Qadim has shut the door.
Past Perfect
I had gone
The past perfect is used to say that in the past, something had already been completed. The present perfect is
described in Chapter 15; if you haven’t disentangled the distinction between the simple past and the present
perfect, it will probably be necessary to re-read Chapter 15.
The past perfect is also used in English, and the meaning is the same. You’re talking about the past, and
saying that some action had already been completed.
16.1 Form
The form of the past perfect is quite straightforward, and is the same in formal and informal Dari (unlike the
present perfect). It is the participle plus the inflected form of ‘was’ (the past stem of [budan] «)»ﺑﻮدن. A full
paradigm is shown in Paradigm 16.1.
Grammar Formula—Positive
75
CHAPTER 16. PAST PERFECT: I HAD GONE 76
For the negative, the neg marker goes on participle part, not the [budan] « »ﺑﻮدنpart. A paradigm is given
in Paradigm 16.2.
Grammar Formula—Negative
16.2 Meaning
To understand the meaning of the past perfect, you first need to be comfortable with the idea of the present
perfect, which is discussed in Chapter 15. The present perfect is used for talking about actions that are
completed in the present time. The past perfect is for talking about events that were complete at some point
in the past. The past perfect comes out naturally when you’re talking about the past.1
(186) Jim came by my office but I didn’t realize it. He tried to come in, but I had locked the door.
In the example above, I’m saying that the door was locked when Jim tried to come in. (I’m not saying that
the door is currently locked—maybe this is a story that took place years ago.) That’s the meaning of the past
perfect. At the time the story was taking place, some action was completed. Or, in the case of the negative,
the action hadn’t be completed.
(187) Jim came by my office and surprised me. He came right in, because I hadn’t locked the door.
16.3 Practice
1. When I arrived, he had already eaten the pumpkin.
2. The magician had already turned into a frog.
3. I was full before lunch.
4. Had you (sg.) seen Kabul before?
5. She still hadn’t finished it when we arrived.
Present Subjuctive
That I might go
The use of the subjunctive is one of the trickier aspects of learning Dari, because English doesn’t have a tense
that works in exactly the same way. Subjunctives are very important though, because they’re used in all sorts
of everyday types of sentences: talking about desires, if-then sentences, making commands, talking about the
reason for things, and so forth.
Many Dari learners stumble on the subjunctive, substituting the simple present where a subjunctive is
needed. This is not a subtle mistake. You need to invest the time to learn to use the subjunctive properly. At
first, this can be simple drills where you listen to the subjunctive using some of the constructions described
below, and then produce them for yourself. That will provide a foothold, but you also need to pay attention
in all your subsequent production as well, so that it becomes a natural part of your speech. Very roughly, the
split between the simple present and the subjunctive 90%-10%.1 That is, the simple present is much more
frequent, but the subjunctive should be coming up routinely in your speech.
It bears repeating: good learning begins with good listening. Since the subjunctive is used so frequently,
and in so many different contexts, you’ll want to pay consistent attention to develop a feel for it.2 A single
lesson in which you review the dozen or so uses the subjunctive described here is not sufficient. You’ll want
to consider the use of the subjunctive in your recordings; in each case you should be able to explain why it is
in the subjunctive.
17.1 Form
Grammar Formula—Positive
A paradigm for the present form of the subjunctive is given in Paradigm 17.1. Note that the paradigm
shows the proper forms of the verb, but does not show complete sentences.
The pronunciation of the subjunctive prefix (subj) changes slightly depending on the verb (Thackston,
1993, p. 101). The default form is [bɛ], as in (188a) below. When the first vowel of the stem is [ʊ], then the
subjunctive becomes [bʊ], as in (188b). Finally, when the stem begins with a vowel, the subjunctive is [bij],
as in (188c).
1 To get this back-of-the-envelope figure, I counted the number of instances of «»اﺳﺖ/« »ﻧﯿﺴﺖand the number of instances of «»ﺑﺎﺷﺪ/«»ﻧﺒﺎﺷﺪ,
77
CHAPTER 17. PRESENT SUBJUCTIVE: THAT I MIGHT GO 78
Two common verbs routinely omit the subjunctive suffix, the verbs for ‘to do’ and ‘to become’. The meaning
does not change, only the form. The pairs below then should be considered equivalent. There is regional
variation in which one variant is more common; practice whichever form is more common in the speech of
your teacher.
Grammar Formula—Negative
3 If a formula helps, the subjunctive of ‘to have’ is the participle of ‘to have’ (Chapter 21 followed by the subjunctive of ‘to be’.
CHAPTER 17. PRESENT SUBJUCTIVE: THAT I MIGHT GO 79
A negative subjunctive is like a regular subjunctive, but the negative prefix (neg) replaces the subj prefix.
The negative versions of the examples above are below.
17.2 Meaning
The typical way of explaining the subjunctive is to list the types of sentences in which it appears, such as those
expressing possibility, probability, necessity, and so forth. That is probably the best way to learn it for most
people, so the list is below. The Dari equivalents of these sentences would all use the subjunctive. Actual Dari
examples are given later in the chapter; for now, focus on understanding the types of sentences below.
• Desire: “I want this trip to be over.”
• If-clauses (conditionals): “If you hit the yak, the car will break down.”
• Possibility: “The car might break down.”
• Probability: “The car will probably break down.”
• Necessity: “The car has to be wrecked after that!”
• Responsibility: “She should get the car fixed.”
• Permission: “You’re allowed to go faster on this road.”
• Polite commands: “Swerve!”
• (Some) questions: “Would you like me to drive?”
• Result/Purpose: “I’m taking the wheel so you can get some sleep.”
• Supposition: “Suppose that we go on Tuesday...”
It may be helpful to observe that in many cases when English uses an infinitive (e.g., ‘to run’), Dari uses the
subjunctive (see below). There is no linguistic significance to this; I include it here in case it helps you to use
the subjunctive properly.
4 Or, if you want the full story: [ʃaw] is the present stem for ‘to become’ in the formal language. In informal Dari, the stem is [ʃ], as in
[me-ʃ-a] ‘he/she/it becomes’. It’s actually the present subjunctive that is anomalous, in that it takes the formal stem as the normal form.
CHAPTER 17. PRESENT SUBJUCTIVE: THAT I MIGHT GO 80
Similarly, saying “She should get the car fixed” is a statement about an obligation, not a real world thing. Or
again, a desire is an ideal state of affairs, not necessarily the actual one. That’s why we use the subjunctive.
Speakers have choices here. Suppose that a friend calls you from a restaurant and asks you to meet her
there. When you arrive, she is nowhere to be found. You realize that she has left. You could either say the
sentence in (197a) or the sentence in (197b).
In (197a), you’re making a statement about the real world. But in (197b), you’re presenting the same
conclusion as the result of a process of reasoning about what must have happened, so you use the subjunctive.
Thinking about the subjunctive as an irrealis mood may or may not be helpful. The list given in the last
section is pretty comprehensive, and it’s perfectly acceptable to memorize those sentence types, and to use the
list as a guide for practice.
17.2.2 Examples
The sentences below all use the subjunctive. You can reflect on these sentences and try to produce your own
examples. Desire and if-clauses are perhaps the most frequent uses of the subjunctive, and it is also easy to
practice with those.6
Desire The most natural way to talk about desires is to use the verb [xʌstan] «»ﺧﻮاﺳنت, followed by a [ke]-
clause with a verb in the subjunctive.
You can also express desires with fixed phrases like [kʌʃ ke] ‘would that...’ and [xʊdʌ kʊna ke] ‘would to God
that...’:
5 Why use the term ‘subjunctive’ if ‘irrealis’ is more appropriate? ‘Subjunctive’ is the term widely used in Persian grammars, and I have
decided not swim against the current on this occasion. The word ‘subjunctive’ itself refers to how it’s often used in [ke] « »ﮐﻪor [aga] «»اﮔﺮ
clauses, as in the examples below.
6 This list of uses of the subjunctive was taken from LCP materials, which seem to be based upon Glassman (2000, pp. 169–174).
CHAPTER 17. PRESENT SUBJUCTIVE: THAT I MIGHT GO 81
It is also possible to express wishes for a third person using the subjunctive. Perhaps this is most natural
when speaking of God:
If-clauses (conditionals) If you’re producing an if-sentence, the ‘if’ part of it is generally in the subjunctive.
(203) aga ʃʊmʌ kʌbʊl bʊren, ma dɛq meʃʊm. . ﻣﻦ دق ﻣﯽﺷﻮم،اﮔﺮ ﺷام ﮐﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮوﯾﺪ
‘If you go to Kabul, I will be sad.’
The ‘then’ part is generally in the simple present, as above. It can be a subjunctive as well, though, if it’s a
subjunctive kind of situation, like expressing an obligation:
(204) aga ʃʊmʌ kʌbʊl bʊren, bʌjad ma-ra xabar kʊnen. . ﺑﺎﯾﺪ ﻣﺮا ﺧﱪ ﮐﻨﯿﺪ،اﮔﺮ ﺷام ﮐﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﺮوﯾﺪ
‘If you go to Kabul, you have to let me know.’
Possibility & Probability Sentences about possibilities and probabilities also use the subjunctive. Possibilities
can be introduced with phrases such as [ɛmkʌn dʌra ke] or [mʊmkɛn ast ke], both of which mean ‘it’s possible
that...’. There are many such phrases, which you can pick up just as you would any other vocabulary item.
Conversely, impossibility can be indicated with the phrases [ɛmkʌn nadʌra ke] or [mʊmkɛn nest ke], which
mean ‘it’s not possible that...’.
A probability can be expressed with [ɛhtɛmʌl dʌra ke] ‘it’s probable that...’
The word [ʃʌjad] «‘ »ﺷﺎﯾﺪperhaps’ is also quite common. It is placed immediately before the verb.
Keep in mind the difference between meaning and usage. The meaning here is probability or possibility, but
as in English, pragmatic factors come into play. A sentence like, “Perhaps that won’t work” can be a polite
way of saying, “That will certainly not work and you shouldn’t even try!”7
7 Cultural tip: in Afghanistan it is generally polite to agree to a suggestion. Once on a road trip I said to my companion, “Do you think
we’ll make it in two hours?” He said, “Yes, perhaps two hours.” But something in his answer seemed strained, so I said, “Or maybe it’ll
be three hours.” Then he relaxed and said, “Yes, three hours,” which was indeed accurate. If your priority is to get information, you may
need to provide people with the opportunity to give it to you.
CHAPTER 17. PRESENT SUBJUCTIVE: THAT I MIGHT GO 82
Necessity & Responsibility A common way to express necessity or responsibility is to use the word [bʌjad]
«»ﺑﺎﯾﺪ, which (like [ʃʌjad]) is placed immediately before the verb.
(209) mʌ bʌjad i kʌr-a xalʌs kʊnim. .ﻣﺎ ﺑﺎﯾﺪ اﯾﻦ ﮐﺎر را ﺧﻼص ﮐﻨﯿﻢ
‘We need to finish this work.’
As in English a sentence like (209) doesn’t really describe the nature of the obligation: it could mean, “We
ought to finish this work.” But the word [bʌjad] « »ﺑﺎﯾﺪis also used for things that are actually inevitable.
Another common way to express obligation is with the verb [madʒbur budan] «»ﻣﺠﺒﻮر ﺑﻮدن.
Permission Asking permission is usually done with the word [ɛdʒʌza] «»اﺟﺎزه. One way to use this is similar
to the English phrase, ‘it is permitted’.
Dari also has expressions similar to ‘to give permission’ and ‘to have permission’.
Commands Using the second personal plural subjunctive is a nice way to issue a command. You can think of
this on analogy with the English, “Would you shut the door?”, which is phrased as a question in the subjunctive,
though it is clearly a command. Since this is for polite commands, it is natural to use [lʊtfan] «ً ‘ »ﻟﻄﻔﺎplease’
(lit. ‘kindly’) in these kinds of sentences.
This could also be translated—more literally, if also more melodramatically—“Would that you would shut the
door!” Informal commands, on the other hand, are handled differently. (You don’t say [lʊtfan darwʌza-ra
basta kʊni]!) See Chapter 10 for more information.
Some questions In certain contexts, it is appropriate to use the subjunctive in asking questions. For instance,
the subjunctive can be used in asking permission, or in making a tentative suggestion.
Purpose A common use of the subjunctive is to express purpose. A regular clause is linked to the explaining
clause with [ke] «‘ »ﮐﻪthat’. If you translate these sentences literally, they sound old-fashioned, but make sense.
(218) dʒɛnɛrʌtur-a gʊl kadʊm ke awlʌdʌ xaw kʊnan. .ﺟرناﺗﻮر را ﮔﻞ ﮐﺮدم ﮐﻪ اوﻻدﻫﺎ ﺧﻮاب ﮐﻨﻨﺪ
‘I turned off the generator so that they children would sleep.’ (Lit. ‘I turned off the generator that the
children might sleep.’)
Talking about purposes is one of the more common uses of the subjunctive. It’s also easy to practice talking
about the reasons that you do things.
Supposition When someone is asked to consider a hypothetical sitaution, it is typical to use the phrase [farz
kʊnen ke] « »ﻓﺮض ﮐﻨﯿﺪ ﮐﻪ, followed by the subjunctive. The meaning here is quite similar to an if-clause; it’s just
that the speaker is being instructed to consider a certain circumstance.
(219) farz kʊnen ke tʌlɛbʌ bijʌjan. bʌz tʃi kʊnim? ﺑﺎز ﭼﻪ ﮐﻨﯿﻢ؟.ﻓﺮض ﮐﻨﯿﺪ ﮐﻪ ﻃﺎﻟﺒﻪﻫﺎ ﺑﯿﺎﯾﻨﺪ
‘Suppose that the Taliban come: then what would we do?’
(220) farz kʊnen ke bimiren. ki fʌmilɛtʌn-a tasali meta? ﮐﯽ ﻓﺎﻣﯿﻠﺘﺎن را ﺗﺴﻠﯽ ﻣﯽدﻫﺪ؟.ﻓﺮض ﮐﻨﯿﺪ ﮐﻪ مبﯿﺮﯾﺪ
‘Suppose you die: who will comfort your family?’
17.4 Practice
1. I want to hit the dinosaur.
Past Subjunctive
I would have gone
The past subjunctive is used when you want a subjunctive meaning in the past tense. The subjunctive is a
topic unto itself, and is discussed throroughly in Chapter 17. The only thing to learn in this chapter is the form
of the past subjunctive.
18.1 Form
Grammar Formula—Positive
As you can see below, the negative works the usual way, with the neg prefix stuck to the beginning of the
word.
Grammar Formula—Negative
Recall that the past subjunctive is identical in form to the past continuous (Chapter 18). It should be clear
from context which is intended.
84
CHAPTER 18. PAST SUBJUNCTIVE: I WOULD HAVE GONE 85
18.2 Meaning
The meaning of the subjunctive is complex, and forms the bulk of Chapter 17. The examples in that chapter
all use the present subjunctive; the past subjunctive is used when those things take place in the past.
Since the past cannot be changed—outside of science fiction—the past subjunctive is generally used for
things that didn’t work out a certain way. For instance, it can be used for a wish or regret:
When you’re making an if -sentence, it works out that both the if -part and the then-part are in the past
subjunctive, because neither really happened:
18.3 Practice
1. If the dinosaur hadn’t been eating my mother, I wouldn’t have attacked it.
2. I wish you had cooked the goat.
Perfect Subjunctive
I must have gone
As you might guess, the perfect subjunctive has the combined meaning of the perfect (Chapter 15) and the
subjunctive (Chapter 17). So, before reading this chapter, it would be worth brushing up on those.
The perfect subjunctive is used when you would want to use the subjunctive, for actions that are (or would
be) completed. For instance, a driver observed a little boy’s sniffling and asked:
In this case, the verb is [sarmʌ xordan] «‘ »ﴎﻣﺎ ﺧﻮردنto catch a cold’. It was placed in the subjunctive because
the speaker is either asking a polite question or making a tentative suggestion. There are many reasons that
one might use the subjunctive; for completed actions, you use the perfect subjunctive.
19.1 Form
The form of the present subjunctive is sort of like a past perfect (Chapter 16) but with the ‘to be’ verb in the
subjunctive (i.e., [bʌʃa] rather than [bud]). That may help you remember how to interpret this tense.
Grammar Formula—Positive
The negative of the perfect subjunctive is also parallel to the past perfect: the neg bit gets stuck on the
front of the content verb (the participle).
86
CHAPTER 19. PERFECT SUBJUNCTIVE: I MUST HAVE GONE 87
Grammar Formula—Negative
19.2 Meaning
As noted above, the perfect subjunctive is used in subjunctive situations, but when the action is completed.
Any of the examples of present subjunctives in Chapter 17 could be changed into perfect subjunctives. The
examples below are perhaps the most typical: where the speaker is concluding that they might have come, or
they must have come.
As discussed in §8.7, you have options in how you speak. Suppose you arrive at a house and see the shoes
of the friends you’re meeting. You could just say, “They’ve come.” That’s not wrong. If, on the other hand,
you used the sentence in (225), you’re being a little more explicit that you’re drawing a conclusion about what
must have happened.
CHAPTER 19. PERFECT SUBJUNCTIVE: I MUST HAVE GONE 88
19.3 Practice
1. The goats must have eaten the wheat.
2. The dinosaur must have eaten the goats.
3. You (informal) must have left the door open.
Other constructions
89
Chapter 20
Infinitives
to go
An infininitive is a way to use a verb as a noun. As in English, the Dari infinitive is the form of the verb you
look up in the dictionary, and also the form of the verb that you would use in talking about it in everyday
speech. Aside from that, however, the Dari infinitive tends to correspond more with English usage of the -ing
suffix, as the Dari and English sentences below illustrate.
20.1 Form
The infinitive of the verb is simply the past stem plus [an], and the negative form simply include the neg
prefix. Infinitives have the stress on the last syllable of the word, like nouns (§2.3).
Grammar Formula
Grammar Formula—Negative
90
CHAPTER 20. INFINITIVES: TO GO 91
20.2 Meaning
Infinitives are used when discussing an activity in the abstract, as a noun.
If you want to specify the object of a verb, it can be joined to the infinitive with an ezafa.
You can add prepositional phrases as well. Note that unlike with other forms of the verb, the prepositional
phrases go after the infinitive.
(229) kʊʃtan-ɛ fil bʌ jak kela nʌmʊmkɛn ast. .ﮐﺸنت ﻓﯿﻞ ﺑﺎ ﯾﮏ ﮐﯿﻠﻪ ﻧﺎﻣﻤﮑﻦ اﺳﺖ
‘Killing an elephant with a banana is impossible.’
(230) dʌdan-ɛ ʃirini ba tɛfl-ʌ amr-ɛ xair ast. .دادن ﺷﯿﺮﯾﻨﯽ ﺑﻪ ﻃﻔﻞﻫﺎ اﻣﺮ ﺧﯿﺮ اﺳﺖ
‘Giving sweets to children is a good deed.’
If you’re speaking about a generic object, it’s possible for the object to precede the infinitive, without the
ezafa (Thackston, 1993, p. 145). The example below is a saying, “Heating water (in general) isn’t difficult.”
(231) ʌb garm kadan mʊʃgɛl nest. .آب ﮔﺮم ﮐﺮدن ﻣﺸﮕﻞ ﻧﯿﺴﺖ
‘Heating water is not difficult.’
You can’t put the object before the infinitive if the object is specific. The different between specific and
non-specific objects is the mind-bending subject of Chapter 6, which discusses the object marker [rʌ] «»را. If
your object is specific (i.e., if it would get the [rʌ] « »راmarker), then it must follow the infinitive; otherwise it
is optional. The example below has a specific direct object. We know that because §6.3.3 says, “Noun phrases
with ‘this’ or ‘that’ always get the object marker.” Therefore, it has to follow the infinitive. It could not precede
it.
(232) nɛwɛʃtan-ɛ i rʌpor mʊʃgɛl ast. .ﻧﻮﺷنت اﯾﻦ راﭘﻮر ﻣﺸﮕﻞ اﺳﺖ
‘Writing this report is difficult.’
If the verb has no object—i.e., if it is intransitive—the subject can be joined to the infinitive with the ezafa.1
(233) raftan-ɛ ahmad ba kʌbʊl befʌjda bud. .رﻓنت اﺣﻤﺪ ﺑﻪ ﮐﺎﺑﻞ ﺑﯽﻓﺎﯾﺪه ﺑﻮد
‘Ahmad’s going to Kabul was useless.’
As noted in §3.5.1, Dari nouns can be changed into adjectives by adding the [i] suffix. Since infinitives are
nouns, you can do this to them as well (Thackston, 1993, p. 183).
1 This is the most exotic fact about Dari grammar, without question. Dari is a straight-up nominative-accusative system, but in
interpreting nouns joined to infinitives with the ezafa, ergativity suddenly pops up.
CHAPTER 20. INFINITIVES: TO GO 92
(235) a. ma kʌr kadan-a xuʃ dʌrʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﮐﺎر ﮐﺮدن را ﺧﻮش دارم
‘I like to work.’
b. ma kʌr-a xuʃ dʌrʊm. .ﻣﻦ ﮐﺎر را ﺧﻮش دارم
‘I like work.’
On the other hand, sometimes the non-verbal element isn’t really sufficient. The sentence below, for
instance, would not make sense without the [zadan] «»زدن.
(237) u tabla zadan-a jʌd nadʌra. .او ﺗﺒﻠﻪ زدن را ﯾﺎد ﻧﺪارد
‘She isn’t familiar with playing the tabla.’
By the same token, sometimes the non-verbal element itself doesn’t explain enough, as in example (238a)
below. This sentence makes sense, but it would only be appropriate if it was clear from context whether the
speaker was giving the lesson or receiving the lesson. If it isn’t clear from context, you can always spell things
out.
20.3 Practice
1. I like reading.
2. Gambing is a sin.
2 The examples in (235a) could represent a difference if the speaker was being careful and clever with his/her use of language, e.g., “He
likes work but he doesn’t like doing work.” Thanks to Hamidullah Muradi for discussion on this point.
Chapter 21
Participles
going
The participle is a form of the Dari verb used in various constructions, often with an idiomatic meaning.1 It is
not exactly a tense, because the participle is never the main verb of the sentence. You can think of the participle
as a component of the perfect (Chapter 15), past perfect (Chapter 16), and perfect subjunctive (Chapter 19).
The participle can also play roles in other constructions, which are introduced below.
21.1 Form
Grammar Formula
(239) batʃa tarsida (o) farʌr kad. .ﺑﭽﻪ ﺗﺮﺳﯿﺪه )و( ﻓﺮار ﮐﺮد
‘The boy got scared and (then) ran away.’
As an English speaker you may be tempted to interpret these as simultaneous events, but that it wrong. First
the participle thing happened, then the main verb thing happened.
It possible to place [o] «‘ »وand’ between the participle and the main verb. This does not change the
meaning. (It is placed in parentheses above to show that it is optional.)
1 What I call the ‘participle’, Glassman (2000) calls the ‘(unchangeable) past participle’. This is a logical label, but I do not believe a
helpful one, as there is no consistent ‘past’ meaning to it, and it’s not obvious what ‘unchangeable’ means, or even what word in that
phrase it is modifying. Glassman’s term has the advantage of distinguishing the participle from the present participle, but since the present
participle is so rare, I don’t see much advantage there.
2 This is different from English, so make sure you understand how these work. Participles can fulfill many roles in an English sentence
93
CHAPTER 21. PARTICIPLES: GOING 94
It’s possible for the participle to have a direct object, as we see below.
(241) mʌdar tʃaj dam kada (o) raft. .ﻣﺎدر ﭼﺎی دم ﮐﺮده )و( رﻓﺖ
‘Mother steeped (some) tea and left.’
Finally, the main verb of the sentence can be in any tense. The example—which is technically a command—
could be a polite request for a guest to enjoy a meal before departing.
(245) bʌd as i awʌ garm ʃʊda mera. .ﺑﻌﺪ از اﯾﻦ ﻫﻮا ﮔﺮم ﺷﺪه ﻣﯽرود
‘After this the weather will keep getting hotter.’
You might notice that this use of the participle is a special case of the general pattern described in the last
section: participle plus main verb. This means that every sentence in this section is ambiguous. You could
interpret the sentence below (which we saw earlier) either as a sequence of events, or with a ‘kept on Xing’
meaning. Context should make clear which meaning is intended.
(246) mʌdar tʃaj dam kada raft. .ﻣﺎدر ﭼﺎی دم ﮐﺮده رﻓﺖ
‘Mother steeped (some) tea and left.’ or ‘Mother kept steeping tea.’
It’s possible for the main verb to be a past tense. For instance, it you were telling about a time you were
unsuccessfully trying to fix a table, you might say:
It is not recommended that you practice this construction with the following sentence, although it seemed
like a good idea to the author when he learned about it in class.
(248) dars xalʌs ʃʊd, lekɛn gap zada meren. . ﻟﯿﮑﻦ ﮔﭗ زده ﻣﯽروﯾﺪ،درس ﺧﻼص ﺷﺪ
‘The lesson is over, but you keep talking.’
CHAPTER 21. PARTICIPLES: GOING 95
A more Badakhshani expression has the participle followed by the verb [istʌd budan]:
There is a Herati expression as well (which is more common in Iran). This construction doesn’t use a
participle, but is included here nevertheless. The inflected present tense of the verb ‘to have’ is used, followed
by the main verb of the sentence.
Unlike other adjectives, though, if you try to do make a ‘Ahmad is X’ type of sentence,4 then you just get a
perfect tense (Chapter 15). The meaning is basically the same, so you probably don’t need to worry about it.
(255) i tʃawki dʒur ʃʊda st. .اﯾﻦ ﭼﻮﮐﯽ ﺟﻮر ﺷﺪه اﺳﺖ
‘This chair has been fixed.’
Often you’ll have a choice between using an active or passive verb (§8.6). Sometimes this matters and
sometimes it doesn’t. For instance you get the same meaning if you use the participle of the active [xordan]
«‘ »ﺧﻮردنxordan’ or the passive [xorda ʃʊdan] «‘ »ﺧﻮرده ﺷﺪنto be drunk’ (i.e., for a glass of water to be drunk,
not for a person to be drunk!). Either participle gives the same meaning:
3 Thanks to Hamidullah Muradi and Mustafa for introducing these constructions to me and for providing these examples.
4 Grammatically, this is using the adjective in predicate position.
CHAPTER 21. PARTICIPLES: GOING 96
On the other hand, the passive seems to be preferred in [ɛntɛxʌb kadan] «‘ »اﻧﻨﺘﺨﺎب ﮐﺮدنto elect’ [ɛntɛxʌb ʃʊdan]
«‘ »اﻧﻨﺘﺨﺎب ﺷﺪنto be elected’.
Some people merely prefer [ɛntɛxʌb ʃʊda], and others say that [ɛntɛxʌb kada] is
not even possible.
The prudent course seems to be to use the passive whenever possible; your experience with native speakers
should guide your intuitions, though.
The final thing to note about participles as adjectives is that they can be negated (made negative) with
the [nʌ] «»ﻧﺎ. You could use the following participles to refer to finished or unfinished work, or to washed or
unwashed hands.
This participle is placed immediately before the main verb—like a normal participle—but instead conveys
simultaneous action.
This form hardly ever occurs in colloquial Dari. You may be better off ignoring it so that you don’t overuse it
and sound awkward!
21.4 Practice
The practice exercises use only the ‘normal’ participle.
Appendices
97
Appendix A
Both written and spoken answers are given. The phonetic transcription is the informal spoken pronunciation,
not the proper pronunciation of the Dari text. Your answers can be quite a bit different from these and still
be correct. Check that your answer is correct with respect to the grammatical construction that is the focus of
the chapter.
Please note that I haven’t had a chance to review these suggested answers with a teacher, so it is
likely that there are mistakes. If you find an error please let me know.
98
APPENDIX A. SUGGESTED ANSWERS FOR THE PRACTICE EXERCISES 99
Glossary
Adjective An adjective is a word that describes a noun, like ‘big’, ‘scary’, or ‘intimidating.’
Agreement In Dari, the verb agrees with the subject. That means that it has a specific ending that has to
match the person of the subject.
Direct object The direct object is the noun phrase that receives the action of a verb, or is affected by the
action of a verb. In the sentence, “Bob hit Mike,” ‘Mike’ is the direct object, because Mike is the one that
got hit.
First Person First person refers to the speaker. In English, depending on the role it’s playing in the sentence,
this could be ‘I’, ‘me’, ‘my’, or ‘mine’ (for the singular) or ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’, or ‘ours’ (for the plural).
Light verb A light verb is the verb part in a compound verb, i.e., a verb with two parts. Usually it does not
contribute much to the meaning of the verb. In the compund verb [kʌr kadan] the light verb is [kadan].
[kadan] is the most common light verb.
Negative The negative form of a verb has the meaning ‘not’. The negative of ‘going’ is ‘not going’. The
negative is mostly used with verbs, but there are some noun prefixes that have a negative meaning as
well.
Noun A noun is a word that refers to a person, place, thing, or idea.
Noun phrase A noun phrase is a group of words that works like a noun in the sentence.
Object marker The object marker is placed after direct objects that the hearer can identify. It is pronounced
[ra] after vowels, and [a] after consonants; in formal Dari it is always pronounced [rʌ].
Possessor suffix A possessor suffix is a suffix added to the end of a noun (or noun phrase), which indicates
possession. English does not have possessor suffixes: we put a special word in front of the noun: ‘my
book’. In Dari this meaning is conveyed with a suffix: [kɛtʌb-ɛm].
Prefix A prefix is a thing you stick on to the beginning of a word. In English, ‘un-’ means ‘not’, as in ‘unhappy’
(=‘not happy’). In Dari, [be] means ‘without’. [be-namak] means ‘without salt’.
Prepositional phrase A prepositional phrase is a preposition followed by a noun phrase. ‘Under the big hairy
dog’ is a prepositional phrase. ‘Under’ is the preposition and ‘the big hairy dog’ is the noun phrase.
Reflexive pronoun A reflexive pronoun is a pronoun that refers back to the subject of the sentence. In the
English, “John laughed at himself,” ‘himself’ is a reflexive pronoun: it refers to John, the subject of the
sentence.
Second Person Second person refers to the person the speaker is speaking to. Depending on the role it’s
playing in the sentence, this could be ‘you’, ‘your’, or ‘yours’ in English.
Subject The subject is a noun phrase in a sentence. It is (approximately) what the sentence is about; or,
the subject is the person (or thing) that is doing the main verb. In Dari and English, the subject of the
sentence usually comes first. In the sentence, ‘Bill loves Sally’, ‘Bill’ is the subject because he is the one
who is loving Sally.
Suffix A suffix is a thing you stick on to the ending of a word. In Dari verbs for example, subject agreement
is shown with a suffix (a verb ending).
104
Glossary 105
Third Person Third person refers to any person or thing that is neither the speaker nor the person nor the
person the speaker is speaking to. In English, depending on the role it’s playing in the sentence, this
could be ‘he’, ‘she’, ‘it’, ‘this’, ‘that’, ‘they’, or any other word!
Appendix C
This is a list of the English translations of the Dari example sentences. It is presented for your convenience,
for looking up grammar.
If you want to say, “He keeps making mistakes,” for example, it’s probably not obvious where in the book
to look for that. You can look at the following list for something similar, though. “The boy and the girl keep
washing the cloth,” is a pretty similar sentence, so you can read in the book around that example.
(2) I am working.
(47) irrigator
(49) savior
106
APPENDIX C. LIST OF EXAMPLE SENTENCES 107
(61b) I went.
(67b) I went.
(89) I’m eating the big apple and the sweet orange.
(121b) I left.
(122b) I left.
(126b) I am working.
(126c) I am sleeping.
(126d) I am resting.
(126e) I am playing.
APPENDIX C. LIST OF EXAMPLE SENTENCES 111
(127b) I worked.
(127c) I slept.
(127d) I rested.
(127e) I played.
(157b) I am a man.
(172) We were in the house all day. I was working. The children were playing.
(218) I turned off the generator so that they children could sleep.
(219) Suppose that the Taliban come: then what would we do?
Glassman, E. (2000). Conversational Dari: An introductory language course in Dari (Afghan Persian), 5th Edition.
The Interlit Foundation.
Haim, S. (2006). Farhang moaser english-persian dictionary. Tehran: Farhang Moaser Publishers.
Karimi, S. (2003). Object positions, specificity and scrambling. In S. Karimi (Ed.), Word order and scrambling
(pp. 91–125). Blackwell Publishers.
Karimi, S. (2005). A Minimalist Approach to Scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Mouton de Gruyter.
Mace, J. (2003). Persian Grammar: For reference and revision. RoutledgeCurzon.
Nation, P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–13.
Roberts, J. R. (2009). A Study of Persian Discourse Structure. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia
Iranica Upsaliensa.
Shokouhi, H. & Kipka, P. (2003). A discourse study of Persian râ. Lingua, 113, 953–966.
Thackston, W. M. (1993). An Introduction to Persian, Revised Third Edition. Bethesda, Maryland: Ibex Publishers.
117