Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comments SC Pua
Comments SC Pua
SUPREME COURT
MANILA
BIENVENIDO WILLIAM
D. LLOREN,
Petitioner, G.R. No. 196355
-versus-
THE COMMISSION ON
ELECTIONS and
ROGELIO D. PUA, JR.,
Respondents.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/
COMMENT
court held:
3
Appeal with the trial court, stating therein that she received
which took effect on July 24, 2008 clarified the existing rules
appeal.
Rule 18 – Decisions
SO ORDERED.
the case to the court a quo for its disposal. These facts were
petition.
1
Annex 1 – Entry of Judgment dated 21 March 2011
2
Annex 2 – Letter of Chief, Judicial Records Division, Comelec dated 23 March 2011
6
2009]
7
xxxx
registered mail on March 21, 2003, but did not pay the
necessary motion fees required under Sec. 7 (f), Rule 40
of the COMELEC Rules of Procedure. He later on filed
another motion for reconsideration on May 16, 2003, also
by registered mail, remitting the required fees by postal
money order, but the COMELEC still rejected the motion
for reconsideration due to the finality of the orders earlier
issued. When the COMELEC’s actions were challenged, the
Court held:
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
III
while, for the latter, the appeal fees are paid to the clerk
of court of the COMELEC.
understanding.
OF MERIT.
By:
LEO S. GIRON
Roll of Attorney No. 37379
IBP Lifetime No. 00733
PTR No. 7018346; 1-3-11; Tacloban City
MCLE Compliance No. III-0006315; 11-23-09
15
VERIFICATION
With Statement of Material Date
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS
Intramuros, Manila 1002
LEO S. GIRON
17
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS
Intramuros, Manila 1002
MARWIN ASTORGA
Affiant