Burgos JR vs. Sps. Naval
Burgos JR vs. Sps. Naval
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2016 > June 2016 Decisions > G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 -
JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND AMALIA B. NAVAL,
Respondents.:
Custom Search
Search
G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND
ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND AMALIA B. NAVAL, Respondents.
FIRST DIVISION
JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND
AMALIA B. NAVAL, Respondents.
RESOLUTION
PERLAS-BERNABE, J.:
The Facts
Sometime in February 2011, Burgos allegedly discovered that TCT No. 550579 was cancelled, and a new
one was issued, i.e., TCT No. 644582,9 in favor of Sps. Naval on April 1, 1998. He claimed that the blank
documents which he and his wife previously signed turned out to be a receipt10 and a Deed of Absolute
Sale11 over the subject lot through the ploy and conspiracy of respondents. Thereafter, or on February
11, 2013, an Information12 was filed before the Regional Trial Court of Antipolo City, Branch 97 (RTC),
docketed as Criminal Case No. 13-45768, accusing respondents of having committed the aforesaid
crime.13 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
Before arraignment, respondents filed a motion to quash14 based on the following grounds: (a) that their
criminal liability has been extinguished due to prescription;15 (b) that the information failed to charge
Amalia with an offense;16 and (c) that they were not afforded the opportunity of a preliminary
investigation.17 Respondents averred that since the information was filed on February 11, 2013, beyond
the reglementary period often (10) years from the registration of the title on April 1, 1998, the crime had
already prescribed. They also claimed that the information did not contain any specific charge against
ChanRobles Intellectual Property Amalia. Finally, they maintained that they were deprived of their right to dispute the allegations of the
complaint during the preliminary investigation.18
Division ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
In an Order19 dated August 14, 2013, the RTC granted respondents' motion and, consequently, dismissed
the case on the ground of prescription.
The RTC essentially observed that the prescriptive period for the alleged crime commenced from the time
Burgos had constructive notice of the alleged falsification, i.e., when the document was registered with
the Register of Deeds on April 1, 1998. Therefore, since more than ten (10) years had elapsed when the
information was filed on February 11, 2013, the subject crime had prescribed.20 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 1/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
Aggrieved, Burgos moved for reconsideration,21 which was denied in an Order22 dated July 14, 2014.
Notably, the RTC declared that it could not order the public prosecutor to amend the information to
include the specific amount of damage sustained by Burgos amounting to P8,500,000.00, as it would
improperly infringe his executive functions.23 Thus, Burgos elevated the matter to the CA via a petition
for certiorari, docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 138203.
The CA Ruling
In a Resolution24 dated March 5, 2015, the CA dismissed the petition for failure of Burgos to join the
People in his certiorari petition as required by the Administrative Code of 1987.25 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
The issue for the Court's resolution is whether or not the CA correctly dismissed the certiorari petition on
the ground that the People, as represented by the OSG, was not impleaded as a party.
In his petition, Burgos averred that the CA Resolutions dated March 5, 2015 and July 2, 2015 should be
declared null and void for having been issued with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess
of jurisdiction. He claimed that he already complied with the directive to furnish the OSG with a copy of
the certiorari petition before the CA,28 and that he even made a letter dated April 7, 2015,29 requesting
the OSG for authority to appear and prosecute the case on behalf of the People. Relatedly, he prayed for
the reinstatement of the Information and/or a declaration that prescription has not yet set in as the
crime of Estafa through Falsification of Public Documents was only discovered sometime in February
2011.30 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
In their comment,31 respondents maintained that Burgos nevertheless failed to furnish the OSG with a
copy of the certiorari petition filed before the CA as mandated by Section 3,32 Rule 46 of the Rules of
Court, which is a sufficient ground for its dismissal.33 In fact, they averred that Burgos did not even
June-2016 Jurisprudence attempt to change or amend the title of the petition from "Jose Burgos, Jr." to "People of the
Philippines."34 Moreover, they pointed out that Burgos's letter-request for authority addressed to the OSG
G.R. No. 175085, June 01, 2016 - TAN SIOK1 KUAN was filed only on April 10, 2015 or nine (9) days after Burgos's receipt of the adverse March 5, 2015 CA
AND PUTE CHING, Petitioners, v. FELICISIMO "BOY" Resolution, further alleging that mere request from the OSG is not tantamount to authority.35
HO, RODOLFO C. RETURTA, VICENTE M. SALAS, AND
ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
Respondent.
(1) Represent the Government in the Supreme Court and the Court of
G.R. No. 211290, June 01, 2016 - OMBUDSMAN- Appeals in all criminal proceedings; represent the Government and its
MINDANAO, Petitioner, v. LILING LANTO IBRAHIM, officers in the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, and all other courts or
PROJECT MANAGER, NATIONAL IRRIGATION tribunals in all civil actions and special proceedings in which the Government
ADMINISTRATION, NIA-PIO, LANAO DEL NORTE, or any officer thereof in his official capacity is a party. (Emphases supplied) cralawred
Respondent.
In People v. Piccio (Piccio),39 this Court held that "if there is a dismissal of a criminal case by the trial
G.R. No. 205061, June 08, 2016 - EMERTIA G. court or if there is an acquittal of the accused, it is only the OSG that may bring an appeal on the
MALIXI, Petitioner, v. MEXICALI PHILIPPINES
criminal aspect representing the People. The rationale therefor is rooted in the principle that the party
AND/OR FRANCESCA MABANTA, Respondents.
affected by the dismissal of the criminal action is the People and not the petitioners who are mere
G.R. No. 208137, June 08, 2016 - MARIA CECILIA complaining witnesses. For this reason, the People are therefore deemed as the real parties in
OEBANDA, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND/OR THE interest in the criminal case and, therefore, only the OSG can represent them in criminal
OCCUPANTS AND EMPLOYEES OF VISAYAN FORUM proceedings pending in the CA or in this Court. In view of the corollary principle that every action
FOUNDATION, INC., Petitioners, v. PEOPLE OF THE must be prosecuted or defended in the name of the real party in interest who stands to be benefited or
PHILIPPINES, Respondent. injured by the judgment in the suit, or by the party entitled to the avails of the suit, an appeal of the
criminal case not filed by the People as represented by the OSG is perforce dismissible. The private
G.R. No. 203750, June 06, 2016 - JORGE B. complainant or the offended party may, however, file an appeal without the intervention of the OSG but
NAVARRA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE only insofar as the civil liability of the accused is concerned. He may also file a special civil action for
PHILIPPINES, HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING certiorari even without the intervention of the OSG, but only to the end of preserving his
CORPORATION, Respondents.
interest in the civil aspect of the case."40 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
G.R. No. 187462, June 01, 2016 - RAQUEL G. KHO, WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The Resolutions dated March 5, 2015 and July 2, 2015 of the
Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES AND Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 138203 are hereby AFFIRMED.
VERONICA B. KHO, Respondents.
SO ORDERED. chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 2/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
MEDEL I. LIRIO, RODERICK B. JAMON, VICTORINO A. Endnotes:
MACHICA, RONNIE C. VALORIA, VIRGILIO M. FLORES,
RENATO C. PALMA, ANGELITO V. GUINTO, RAMIRO M.
FELICIANO, ENRIQUE L. CIUBAL, ELMER P. TABIGAN, ** Per Special Order No. 2354 dated June 2, 2016.
VENANCIO T. MADRIA, MAXIMO M. VITANGCOL,
RODOLFO L. PAGUIO, ARNEL F. MAGSALIN, JULIANA 1Rollo,
N. DOLOR, NOEL C. CRUZ, SANDY C. JARILLA, pp. 3-24.
BERTITO I. SERVIDAD, ALAN R. CORPUZ, ROBERT D.
2 Id. at 26-28. Penned by Associate Justice Amy C. Lazaro-Javier with Associate Justices
PABLO, ROBERT H. MONTEREY, HENRY L. LIAO,
ROLANDO C. CEBANICO, VELIENTE S. FANTASTICO, Celia C. Librea-Leagogo and Melchor Q. C. Sadang concurring.
MA. EMILIAN S. CRUZ, EDGARDO G. GAMBAYAN,
GERARDO M. RUMBAWA, DANTE D. PALOMARA, MA. 3 Id. at 30.
TERESA B. DE LOS REYES, JOSE ALLAN S. PACIFICO,
RESTITUTO R. MALAPO, EARL G. PONGCO, LUCILO C. 4
DEL MONTE, RUEL F. MAGBALANA, MARLYN V. Id. at 31-47.
VILLANUEVA, JUDITH C. BANEZ, GERMAN N. DE LUNA,
FREDERICK B. DEL CORRO, CLODUALDO B. PASIOLAN, 5 Id. at 55-57.
ROLANDO I. NAVARRO, AND PACIANO J.
VILLANUEVA,*, Respondents. 6 Id. at 58-59.
G.R. No. 211026, June 27, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE 7
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RENATO B. See Real Estate Mortgage with Power to Sell; id. at 62-64.
SUEDAD, Accused-Appellant.
8 See id. at 55-56.
G.R. No. 204441, June 08, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL KURT JOHN 9 Id. at 66-69.
BULAWAN Y ANDALES, Respondent.
10 Id. at 72.
G.R. No. 201834, June 01, 2016 - ANDRES L.
DIZON, Petitioner, v. NAESS SHIPPING PHILIPPINES,
INC. AND DOLE UK (LTD.), Respondents. 11 Id. at 73-75.
G.R. No. 196962, June 08, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE 12 Id. at 78-79. Issued by Assistant Provincial Prosecutor Teresita Carigma-Palos.
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOAN SONJACO Y
STA. ANA, Accused-Appellant. 13 See id. at 56-57.
G.R. No. 191936, June 01, 2016 - VIRGINIA D.
CALIMAG, Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF SILVESTRA N. 14 Filed on May 8, 2013. Id. at 80-82.
MACAPAZ, REPRESENTED BY ANASTACIO P.
MACAPAZ, JR., Respondents. 15 Id. at 80.
G.R. No. 193374, June 08, 2016 - HEIRS OF THE 16
LATE GERRY* ECARMA, NAMELY: AVELINA SUIZA- Id. at 81.
ECARMA, DENNIS ECARMA, JERRY LYN ECARMA PENA,
ANTONIO ECARMA AND NATALIA ECARMA 17 Id. at 82.
SANGALANG, Petitioners, v. COURT OF APPEALS AND
RENATO A. ECARMA, Respondents. 18 See id. at 81-82.
G.R. No. 175592, June 14, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE 19
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDISON C. Id. at 50-53. Penned by Presiding Judge Miguel S. Asuncion.
MAGBITANG, Accused-Appellant.
20 See id. at 51-53.
G.R. No. 174838, June 01, 2016 - STRONGHOLD
INSURANCE CO., INC., Petitioner, v. PAMANA ISLAND 21 See motion for reconsideration (to the Order dated August 14, 2013) filed on
RESORT HOTEL AND MARINA CLUB, INC., Respondent. September 16, 2013; id. at 88-92.
G.R. No. 185331, June 08, 2016 - SPOUSES 22
ABELARDO VALARAO AND FRANCISCA VALARAO, Id. at 48-49.
Petitioners, v. MSC AND COMPANY, Respondent.
23 Id.
G.R. No. 205097, June 08, 2016 - CORAZON D.
ISON, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, 24 Id. at 26-28.
Respondent.
chanrobleslaw
25 Section 35 (1), Chapter 12, Title III of Book IV of Executive Order No. 292, entitled
G.R. No. 211212, June 08, 2016 - SUN LIFE OF
CANADA (PHILIPPINES), INC., Petitioner, v. MA. "INSTITUTING THE 'ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF 1987'" signed on July 25, 1987, mandates
DAISY'S. SIBYA, JESUS MANUEL S. SIBYA III, JAIME the OSG to represent the "Government in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals in
LUIS S. SIBYA, AND THE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED all Criminal proceedings; x x x."
ATTY. JESUS SIBYA, JR., Respondents.
26 See motion for reconsideration filed on April 15, 2015; rollo, pp. 93-99.
G.R. No. 208646, June 15, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LORETO SONIDO 27
Y CORONEL, Accused-Appellant. Id. at 30.
G.R. No. 207517, June 01, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE 28 Id. at 94.
PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. RAUL AMARO Y CATUBAY
ALIAS "LALAKS," Appellant. 29 Through Burgos's counsel, Atty. Cris T. Paculanang. Id. at 103.
G.R. No. 200081, June 08, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE 30
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EDGARDO T. Id. at 18-19.
CRUZ, Accused-Appellant.
31 Filed on February 11, 2016. Id. at 105-110.
G.R. No. 194605, June 14, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARIANO 32Section3. Contents and filing of petition; effect of noncompliance with
OANDASAN, JR., Accused-Appellant. requirements. - x x x.
G.R. No. 214440, June 15, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALEX MENDEZ xxxx
RAFOLS, Accused-Appellant.
It shall be filed in seven (7) clearly legible copies together with proof of service thereof on
G.R. No. 217732, June 15, 2016 - EMILIO S. the respondent with the original copy intended for the court indicated as such by the
AGCOLICOL, JR., Petitioner, v. JERWIN CASI�O, petitioner, and shall be accompanied by a clearly legible duplicate original or certified true
Respondent. copy of the judgment, order, resolution, or ruling subject thereof, such material portions of
the record as are referred to therein, and other documents relevant or pertinent thereto. x
G.R. No. 172352, June 08, 2016 - LAND BANK OF x x.
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. ALFREDO HABABAG,
SR., SUBSTITUTED BY HIS WIFE, CONSOLACION, AND xxxx
CHILDREN, NAMELY: MANUEL, SALVADOR, WILSON,
JIMMY, ALFREDO, JR., AND JUDITH, ALL SURNAMED
The failure of the petitioner to comply with any of the foregoing requirements shall be
HABABAG, Respondents.; G.R. NOS. 172387-88 -
ALFREDO HABABAG, SR., SUBSTITUTED BY HIS WIFE, sufficient ground for the dismissal of the petition. (Emphasis supplied)
CONSOLACION, AND CHILDREN, NAMELY: MANUEL,
33Rollo, p. 108.
SALVADOR, WILSON, JIMMY, ALFREDO, JR., AND
JUDITH, ALL SURNAMED HABABAG, Petitioners, v.
LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES AND THE 34 Id. at 109.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, Respondent.
35 Id.
G.R. No. 215994, June 06, 2016 - OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN AND FIELD INVESTIGATION OFFICE,
36 See People v. Piccio, G.R. No. 193681, August 6, 2014, 732 SCRA 254, 261.
Petitioner, v. ROLANDO B. FALLER, Respondent.
A.C. No. 11069, June 08, 2016 - RONALDO C. 37Gonzales v. Chavez, G.R. No. 97351, February 4, 1992, 205 SCRA 816, 845.
FACTURAN, Complainant, v. PROSECUTOR ALFREDO L.
BARCELONA, JR., Respondent. 38 See Executive Order No. 292.
G.R. No. 208475, June 08, 2016 - PEOPLE OF THE
39 Supra note 36.
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MANUEL
REBANUEL Y NADERA, Accused-Appellant.
40 Id. at 261-262; emphases and underscoring supplied.
G.R. No. 168749, June 06, 2016 - SUGARSTEEL
INDUSTRIAL, INC. AND MR. BEN YAPJOCO, 41
Petitioners, v. VICTOR ALBINA, VICENTE UY AND See rollo, p. 43.
ALEX VELASQUEZ, Respondents.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 3/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
42 Id. at 30.
G.R. No. 160071, June 06, 2016 - ANDREW D. FYFE,
RICHARD T. NUTTALL, AND RICHARD J. WALD, 43
Petitioners, v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., See People v. Piccio, supra note 36, at 262.
Respondent.
44Hun Hyung Park v. Eung Won Choi, 544 Phil. 431, 444 (2007). See also Section 2, Rule
G.R. No. 217943, June 06, 2016 - J. MELLIZA 111 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure.
ESTATE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, ATTY. RAFAEL S.
VILLANUEVA, Petitioner, v. ROSENDO SIMOY,
GREGORIO SIMOY AND CONSEJO SIMOY,
Respondents.
Back to Home | Back to Main
G. R. No. 185169, June 15, 2016 - HEIRS OF
CATALINO DACANAY, HIS WIFE ERLINDA DACANAY,
THEIR CHILDREN AURORA D. CONSTANTINO AND
REYNALDO DACANAY; LOLITA DACANAY VDA. DE QUICK SEARCH
PARASO; HEIRS OF SOLEDAD APOSTOL, NAMELY: HER
HUSBAND LEONARDO CAGUIOA, THEIR CHILDREN
AMALIA, DANILO, RONALD, MARLENE, ROBERT,
ROLDAN, THELMA AND TERESA, ALL SURNAMED
CAGUIOA, Petitioners, v. JUAN SIAPNO, JR., MARIO 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908
RILLON, SPOUSES JOSE TAN AND LETICIA DY TAN, 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
Respondents.
1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
G.R. No. 201016, June 22, 2016 - LEONCIA A. 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
YUMANG, Petitioner, v. RADIO PHILIPPINES
NETWORK, INC. (RPN 9), MIA A. CONCIO, LEONOR C. 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
LINAO, IDA BARRAMEDA AND LOURDES O. ANGELES, 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
Respondents.
1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
G.R. No. 189401, June 15, 2016 - VIL-REY 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
PLANNERS AND BUILDERS, Petitioners, v. LEXBER,
INC., Respondent.; G.R. NO. 189447 - LEXBER, INC., 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
Petitioner, v. STRONGHOLD INSURANCE COMPANY, 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
INC., Respondent.
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
G.R. No. 203057, June 06, 2016 - BUREAU OF 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
INTERNAL REVENUE AS REPRESENTED BY THE
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
v. MANILA HOME TEXTILE, INC, THELMA LEE AND 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SAMUEL LE,E, Respondents.
2013 2014 2015 2016
G.R. No. 204769, June 06, 2016 - MAGSAYSAY
MARITIME CORP., CSCS BMTERNATIONAL NV AND/OR
MARLON* RONO, Petitioners, v. RODEL A. CRUZ,
Respondent.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 4/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
G.R. No. 189516, June 08, 2016 - EDNA MABUGAY-
OTAMIAS, JEFFREN M. OTAMIAS AND MINOR JEMWEL
M. OTAMIAS, REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER EDNA
MABUGAY-OTAMIAS, Petitioners, v. REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY COL. VIRGILIO O.
DOMINGO, IN HIS CAPACITY AS THE COMMANDING
OFFICER OF THE PENSION AND GRATUITY
MANAGEMENT CENTER (PGMC) OF THE ARMED
FORCES OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent.
A.C. No. 9871, June 29, 2016 - IN RE: A.M. NO. 04-
7-373-RTC [REPORT ON THE JUDICIAL AUDIT
CONDUCTED IN THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 60, BARILI, CEBU] AND A.M. NO. 04-7-374-
RTC [VIOLATION OF JUDGE ILDEFONSO SUERTE,
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 60, BARILI, CEBU
OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 36-2004 DATED
MARCH 3, 2004], PROSECUTOR MARY ANN T.
CASTRO-ROA, Respondent.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 5/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
EFREN GASCON Y DELOS SANTOS @ "EFREN,"
RICARDO SALAZAR Y GO @ "ERIC," AND JOHN DOE,
Accused-Appellants.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 6/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
ARNULFO R. VERSOZA AND PRISCILLA M. VERSOZA;
SPOUSES DOMINGO AND DOMINGA GOMEZ; AND
ERLINDA GOMEZ-OCAY, IN HER BEHALF AND IN
BEHALF OF CARLITO, MEDELINA, ANGELISTA,
SILVERA, LOLITA, & ROMBERTO, ALL SURNAMED
GOMEZ, Intervenor-Respondents.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 7/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
G.R. No. 205544, June 29, 2016 - MUNICIPALITY
OF CORDOVA, PROVINCE OF CEBU; THE
SANGGUNIANG BAYAN OF CORDOVA; AND THE
MAYOR OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF CORDOVA,
Petitioners, v. PATHFINDER DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION AND TOPANGA DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, Respondents.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 8/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
RUFINO BUTIHIN AND CECILIA CAGNO, SPOUSES
EFITACIO G. PAMISA AND VIRGELIA VIRTUDAZO,
DELFIN B. SARINAS, SPOUSES FELIPE C. VIRTUDAZO,
JR. AND GRACE TUTO, SPOUSES ANGEL BARBOSA AND
FLORENCIA SALISE, SPOUSES FRANKLIN AND
LEONORA PAMISA, SPOUSES MARCELO MANIQUE AND
CECILIA CARBON, LARRY PAMISA, SPOUSES ENRIQUE
CARBON AND ERLINDA SOMO, SPOUSES WILFREDO A.
JUANILO AND MINDA VILLARMIA, SPOUSES FELIX
REQUILME AND CERINA SALVO, SPOUSES CARLITO
FABE AND EMELITA MANGGANA, LUIBEN MAGTO,
SPOUSES SERAFIN AND LILIA SURIGAO, SPOUSES
HILARIO BACABIS AND RETIFICACION DABLO,
SPOUSES REYNALDO S. SALUCOT AND ANECITA
DESCALLAR, SPOUSES HAGENIO PAUG AND EVELITA
VIRTUDAZO, SPOUSES MAXIMO BORREZ AND VILMA
SALISE, SPOUSES FELIMON V. SALVO, JR., EVA
MACATOL AND RITA V. SALVO, Petitioners, v.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM ADJUDICATION
BOARD REGION X ADJUDICATOR ABETO SALCEDO, JR.
AND RICARDO GACULA, Respondents.
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 9/10
9/10/2018 G.R. No. 219468, June 08, 2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL, AND…
G.R. No. 190506, June 13, 2016 - CORAL BAY
NICKEL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER
OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Copyright © 1998 - 2018 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=471 10/10