Premenstrual Syndrome Frequency, Premenstrual Syndrome Coping Strategies and Factors Affecting Premenstrual Syndrome in University Students in Turkey
Premenstrual Syndrome Frequency, Premenstrual Syndrome Coping Strategies and Factors Affecting Premenstrual Syndrome in University Students in Turkey
ISSN 2454-5872
Tuğba Özmermer
Institue of Health Science, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey
[email protected]
Fatma Koruk
Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey
[email protected]
Abstract
Premenstrual syndrome(PMS) symptoms influence women’s lives to a large extent. This study
was conducted to understand the frequency of PMS, coping strategies and factors affecting PMS
in university students in Sanliurfa, Turkey. In this cross-sectional study in which 376 university
students were reached. 52.1% of the students were found to experience PMS. Engaging in
various activities to expend energy eating sweets and using analgesics were found to be the most
common methods used by the students to cope with PMS symptoms; however, they were not able
to cope efficiently with water retention, balance/control issues and autonomic reactions. The
logistic regression analysis showed that a unit of increase in age led PMS risk to increase by a
factor of 1.179, whereas a unit of increase in weight led to an increase in PMS risk by a factor of
1.025.Also, low income increased PMS risk by a factor of 1.884, fast food consumption
increased it by a factor of 2.069, high salt consumption by a factor of 1.884, and anemia
presence by a factor of 1.739. In conclusion, the prevalence of PMS was found to be high in the
students and they were observed to have difficulty in coping with certain symptoms. On the basis
of the results of the study, it is recommended that university students be given information about
factors affecting PMS, how to cope with symptoms, what treatments are available, and that they
been couraged to receive treatment for PMS.
Keywords
Premenstrual Syndrome, Menstruation, Coping Methods, University Students
1. Introduction
Frequently seen in women, Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) is a collection of somatic,
cognitive, emotional and affective symptoms which occur during the luteal phase of menstrual
cycle, improve rapidly with the onset of menstruation, and are frequently observed throughout
the reproductive period (Bölükbaş & Tiryaki, 2003; Nisar, Zehra, Haider, Munir & Sohoo,
2008).
Although PMS was defined long ago, its cause has not yet been illuminated. The
occurrence of the syndrome is triggered by hormonal changes. There are various theories about
what causes PMS. These include estrogen-progesterone imbalance, fluid retention, excessive
secretion of prostaglandins, prolactin and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone imbalance, and
psychosocial factors (O'Brien & Ismail, 2007; Taşkın, 2009; Türkçapar, A. F. & Türkçapar, M.
H.,2011; Rosenfeld, et. al., 2008). Studies report that PMS is related to numerous factors. Some
of these factors include age, stress, educational level, presence of PMS in the mother, leaving
home for university, lack of physical activity, fast food consumption, experiencing menstrual
irregularities, smoking, lack of knowledge or negative attitudes about menstruation,
dysmenorrhea and caffeine consumption (Kırcan, Ergin, Adana & Arslantaş, 2012; Kısa,
Zeyneloğlu & Güler, 2012; Nisar, et. al., 2008; Erbil, Karaca & Kırış, 2010; Demir, Algül &
Güven, 2006; Gümüş, Bayram, Can & Kader, 2012; Tolassa & Bekele, 2014; Kebapçılar, Taner,
Başoğul & Okan, 2012; Seedhom, Mohammed & Mahfouz, 2013; Robinson & Swindle, 2000).
The most common symptoms in women experiencing PMS are uneasiness, discomfort,
inability to control anger, fatigue, dizziness, increased appetite, anxiety, lack of concentration,
breast tenderness and swelling, and muscle and joint pain (Kısa, Zeyneloğlu & Güler, 2012;
Erbil, Karaca & Kırış, 2010; Naeimi, 2015; Kebapçılar, et. al., 2012; Seedhom, Mohammed &
Mahfouz, 2013; Pınar & Öncel, 2011; Song, Chae, Jang, Park, Lee, K. E., Lee, S. H. & Jung,
2013; Daşıkan, Taş & Sözen, 2014). Although PMS symptoms influence women’s lives to a
large extent, most women with these symptoms are not eager to seek help for treatment due to
behavioral obstacles (Robinson & Swindle, 2000). Studies show that the rate of seeing a
physician with PMS-related complaints varies from 14.4% to 28.8% among women, which is
quite low (Demir, Algül & Güven, 2006; Sule & Ukwenya, 2007). While resorting to temporary
solutions (e.g. calling in sick, skipping school, overeating etc.) may provide short-term relief,
such solutions lead to the recurrence of PMS symptoms in the long run (Türkçapar, A. F.
&Türkçapar, M. H., 2011).
The severity of PMS symptoms is known to increase with age, peaks between the ages of
25-35 and starts to decline as menopause is approached (Yonkers &Davis, 2000). Although it has
been suggested that PMS is seen more commonly in women in their thirties, recent studies report
that it is also observed during adolescence and in the years following menarche (Öztürk & Can,
2008).Young women are one of groups most affected by PMS (Tolassa & Bekele, 2014;Eke,
Akabuike & Maduekwe, 2011) and changes during the premenstrual period affect young
women’s academic achievements, class attendance, emotional state, social activitiesand family
relationships (Tolassa & Bekele, 2014; Eke, Akabuike & Maduekwe, 2011). Due to its negative
effects on everyday life, it is important to scientifically assess the frequency of PMS, factors
affecting PMS, methods of coping with PMS, and the groups in which PMS is commonly seen,
in order to take the necessary countermeasures. This study was planned to obtain evidence-based
data related to the responses of university students to menstruation, problems experienced during
menstrual and premenstrual periods, and whether they have sufficient information related to
menstruation.
Hence, the study was performed to reveal the frequency of PMS, PMS coping strategies,
and factors affecting PMS in university students in Sanliurfa, Turkey.
2012; Kırcan, et. al., 2012; Tanrıverdi, Selçuk & Okanlı, 2010), the sample size of the study was
calculated to be 376 with a frequency of 57.4%, an error limit of 5% and a confidence interval of
95%. A group of reserves was selected equal to 10% of the sample size to replace students who
were not present on the day of study and could not be contacted. The students were selected from
the student list received from the Student Affairs Department of Harran University using the
simple random sampling method.
2.2 Data Collection
The data of the study was collected using the “Personal Information Form” developed by
the researchers based on a literature review (Kısa, Zeyneloğlu & Güler, 2012;Bianco, et. al.,
2014; Naeimi, 2015; Song, et. al., 2013; Tolassa & Bekele, 2014) and the “Premenstrual
Syndrome Scale” (Gençdoğan, 2006), which was used to measure the severity of symptoms
during PMS.
2.2.1 Personal Information Form
The form consisted of 59 questions. 12 questions were related to students’ socio-
demographic characteristics (age, faculty, department, marital status, place of residence for the
last five years, cohabitants, parents’ educational level, parents’ employment status, economic
status, family type), eight questions were related to menstrual cycle characteristics (age at
menarche, menstruation frequency, duration of menstruation, prior information related to
menstruation before menarche, the initial source of information related to menstruation, the
sufficiency of information related to menstruation, feelings during menarche, the meaning of
menstruation), 21 questions were related to risk factors in the menstrual cycle (weight, height,
BMI, presence of a disorder diagnosed by a physician, presence of regular drug use, the most
frequently consumed food group, frequency of coffee consumption, frequency of tea
consumption, frequency of soft drink consumption, smoking status, alcohol consumption,
whether or not the participant adds salt to food without tasting it first, exercise status, presence of
tension prior to menstruation, presence of tension prior to menstruation in mother or sister,
anemia presence, presence of anger management issues), and 18 questions were related to
methods used for coping with the premenstrual syndrome experienced (pain during the period
prior to menstruation, water retention, autonomic reactions, negative feelings, lack of
concentration, behavioral changes, resurgence, balance/control, increased appetite, and the
methods used to cope with these problems).
3. Findings
The mean age of the study participants was 20.18±1.71, and 42.0% were in the 19-20 age
group. 31.9% of the students were enrolled in health-related programs, whereas 68.1% were
enrolled in non-health-related programs. 98.9% were single, 55.1% had lived in the city center
for the last five years and 58.0% resided in dormitories. 40.7% of the participants had an
illiterate mother, 37.2% had a father who had graduated primary school, 44.9% had lower
expenditures than their income, and 66.0% had a nuclear family.
The mean menarche age among the students was 13.60±1.26 and 73.7% had a menarche
age between 13 and 15. 53.5% of the students had a menstruation frequency of between 22 and
28 days, and the duration of menstruation was between four and seven days for 86.7%. Also,
97.3% of the students reported a regular menstruation and 81.4% had been informed about
menstruation before their first menstruation. 31.6% received their first information about
menstruation from their mothers and 58.2% believed that their knowledge regarding
menstruation was sufficient. 66.0% of the students experienced fear and panic during their first
menstruation and 29.3% stated that menstruation meant leaving childhood/feeling like a woman.
76.6% of the students had a normal body mass index (BMI), 91.5% had no disorder
diagnosed by a physician, and among those who had a disorder diagnosed by a physician, 21.9%
had high blood pressure and 21.9% had a gynecological disorder. 6.6% of the students used a
drug on a regular basis, and 20.0% of these students used iron supplementation.
The most frequently consumed food groups were vegetables and fruit, eaten by 44.9% of
the students. 44.1% consumed 1-2 cups of coffee a week, 57.7% consumed 1-2 cups of tea a day,
and 40.2% consumed 1-2 cans/glasses of cola a week. In addition, 90.4% of the students were
non-smokers, and 33.3% of the smokers reported that they smoked half a pack a day. 99.2% did
not consume alcohol, and those who reported that they consumed alcohol drank 1-2 times a year.
75% of the students refrained from adding salt without tasting their food first, 69.7% did
not exercise, 95.6% walked frequently, and 44.7% of those who frequently walked reported that
they exercised for 30 minutes to 1 hour a day.
65.7% of the students reported that they experienced tension prior to menstruation, 74.9%
reported that their mothers had not experienced tension prior to menstruation, while 50.7%
reported tension in their sisters prior to menstruation. Also, 57.8% of the students had anemia,
86.2% could not manage their anger, and 39.8% of those who could not manage their anger
found it particularly difficult to manage their anger prior to menstruation.
82.4% of the students reported pain during the premenstrual period, while 75.3% reported
water retention and 33.0% reported autonomic reaction issues. 61.4% of the students reported
negative feelings, 39.1% reported loss of concentration, 51.3% reported behavioral changes,
16.8% reported a resurgence of energy, 28.2% reported balance/control issues, and 41.0%
reported increased appetite (Table 1).
Table 1: Distribution of PMS Symptoms and Sub-group Symptoms Experienced by the Students
PMS Symptoms Number %
Pain
Yes
Muscle tension, muscle pain 17 4.5
Headache 4 1.1
Back pain 99 26.3
Fatigue, general pain 61 16.2
Stomachache 129 34.3
No 66 17.6
Water Retention
Yes
Weight gains 14 3.7
Spots on the skin and acne 102 27.2
Breast pain or tenderness 44 11.7
Swelling in breast and bloating 123 32.7
No 93 24.7
Autonomic Reaction
Yes
Dizziness/fainting 26 6.9
Cold sweats 19 5.1
Nausea/vomiting 39 10.4
Fever 40 10.6
No 252 67.0
Negative Feelings
Yes
Loneliness 25 6.6
Anxiety, uneasiness, tension 114 30.3
Mood changes 3 0.8
Crying, sadness, melancholy 86 22.9
Hyperactivity 3 0.8
No 145 38.6
Loss of Concentration
Yes
Insomnia 30 8.0
Amnesia, drowsiness, indecisiveness 39 10.4
Difficulty in focusing, absence of mind 54 14.3
Confusion, minor accidents due to carelessness 20 5.3
Lack of coordination 4 1.1
No 229 60.9
Behavioral Changes
Yes
Decreased ability to study or work 83 22.1
Decreased efficiency 5 1.3
Drug use 80 21.3
Resurgence of Energy
Yes
Excessive displays of affection 10 2.7
Being tidy and organized 5 1.3
Being excited, frantic 14 3.7
Sense of well-being, happiness 4 1.1
Increased energy and activity 30 8.0
No 313 83.2
Balance/Control Issues
Yes
Feeling suffocated, heavy 53 14.2
Chest pains, palpitations 40 10.6
Ringing in the ears 3 0.8
Tingling and loss of feeling in extremities 5 1.3
Blurred or impaired vision 5 1.3
No 270 71.8
Increased Appetite
Yes
Appetite for chocolate and sweets 73 19.4
Appetite for baked products 1 0.3
Overeating 73 19.4
Appetite for vegetables and fruits 6 1.6
Appetite for dried nuts and chips 1 0.3
No 222 59.0
52.1% of the students were found to have PMS and the mean PSS score was 111.36±
36.11. The mean score obtained by the students was 18.24±7.55 in the depressive affection
factor, 14.18±6.21 in the anxiety factor, 17.64±6.06 in the fatigue factor, 13.44±5.78 in the
nervousness factor, 16.42±6.94 in the depressive thoughts factor, 8.18±3.12 in the pain factor,
7.69±3.86 in the appetite changes factor, 7.82±3.25 in the sleep changes factor and 7.71±3.68 in
the bloating factor (Table 2).
The students were able to cope with pain, negative feelings, loss of concentration,
behavioral changes, a resurgence of energy and increased appetite. However, they were not able
to cope with water retention, autonomic reactions and balance/control issues. The most
commonly used methods to cope with PMS symptoms included engaging in various activities to
expend energy (50.8%), eating sweets (48.1%), using analgesics (33.3%), resting (27.4%), doing
things that make one happy (25.5%), walking (10.4%) and drinking lots of water and herbal tea
(9.2%) (Table 3).
Many factors that might affect PMS were analyzed in the study. It was found that the
incidence of PMS increased with increasing age (the median age for those with PMS was 20.4,
whereas the median age for those without PMS was 19.9) and increasing weight (the median
weight for those with PMS was 56.4, whereas the median weight for those without PMS was
54.8) (p<0.05). Height, body mass index, age at first menstruation, menstruation frequency,
menstruation duration and menstruation regulation had no effect on PMS (P>0.05). Also,
experiencing tension prior to the menstruation period, tension in the mother and sister prior to the
menstruation period and insufficient knowledge and negative attitude towards menstruation had
no significant relationship with PMS (P>0.05). Frequency of PMS was found to be higher in the
students with anemia (63.7%) compared to those without anemia (47.2%) (p<0.05).
The incidence of PMS was higher in the students with a lower income (60.4%) compared
to those with a higher income level (32.5%) (P<0.05). The faculty in which the students were
enrolled, marital status, the place where they had lived for the longest period of time,
cohabitants, educational level of parents, employment status of parents, family type, presence of
a disorder diagnosed by a physician and regular use of medicines were found to have no
significant relationship with PMS (P>0.05).
The incidence of PMS was higher in those who consumed fast food (66.7%) compared to
those who did not (49.4%), and in those who had a high salt consumption (64.9%) compared to
those who had a low salt consumption (47.9%) (p<0.05). Coffee consumption, tea consumption,
soft drink consumption, alcohol consumption, amount of alcohol consumed, smoking, exercise
status, exercise type and exercise frequency were observed to have no effect on PMS (P>0.05).
A logistic regression model (Backward Stepwise [Conditional]) was created in the study
using variables which showed significant difference in single-variable analyses which included
age (continuous variable), weight (continuous variable), income level (categorical variable), fast
food consumption (categorical variable), salt consumption (categorical variable) and presence of
anemia (categorical variable). According to the logistic regression analysis, a unit of increase in
age led to an increase of PMS risk by a factor 1.179, whereas a unit of increase in weight led to
an increase of PMS risk by a factor of 1.025. Also, a low income increased the PMS risk by a
factor of 1.884, fast food consumption by a factor of 2.069, high salt consumption by a factor of
1.884and presence of anemia by a factor of 1.739.
4. Discussion
PMS is a significant community health problem which is frequently seen in women of
reproductive age, affects not only women but also their families and society, disrupts women’s
mental health, causes a loss of working hours and reduces quality of life (Kırcan, et. al., 2012;
Direkvand-Moghadam, et. al., 2014). To consider the negative effects of PMS on women’s
physical, social, and psychological well-being, we investigated the prevalence of PMS, PMS
coping strategies, and factors affecting PMS in nursing students. More than half of the
participants were found to have PMS. Studies from around the world report a prevalence of
PMSvarying from 12% to 98% (Direkvand-Moghadam, et. al., 2014). The prevalence of
PMSreported in Turkish studies with university students, on the other hand, varies from 36.4% to
67.5% (Kısa, Zeyneloğlu & Güler, 2012; Kırcan, et. al., 2012; Tanrıverdi, Selçuk & Okanlı,
2010; Selçuk, Avcı & Yılmaz, 2014; Gümüş, Bayram, Can & Kader, 2012; Yücel, Bilge, Oran,
Ersoy, Gençdoğan & Özveren, 2009; Elkin, 2015; Aşcı, Süt & Gökdemir, 2016). While these
results indicate differences between PMS prevalence around the world and in Turkey, they also
show that PMS is a quite common problem. The differences between the findings may be due to
cultural and environmental differences found in different countries and the different data
collection tools and samples used in the various studies.
The mean PSS score of the students participating in the study was 111.36±36.11. This
indicates that the students experienced PMS symptoms at a moderate to high level. Other studies
report a mean PSS score varying from 110.49±32.62 to 121.3±34.02 (Kısa, Zeyneloğlu & Güler,
2012; Erbil, Karaca & Kırış, 2010; Oo, Sein, Mar & Aung, 2016; Selçuk, Avcı & Yılmaz, 2014).
It was found in the study that the students used different methods to cope with PMS
symptoms, including using analgesics, engaging in activity, or eating sweets. Most students were
able to cope with pain, negative feelings, and resurgence of energy using these methods;
however, they were not able to cope with water retention, autonomic reactions, loss of
concentration, behavioral changes and balance/control issues. In parallel with our study, a review
of the literature reveals that women use various methods to cope with PMS symptoms such as
using analgesics, using a hot water bottle, exercise, resting, massaging the abdomen and the
waist, and eating chocolate and sweets (Bölükbaş & Tiryaki, 2003; Kısa, Zeyneloğlu & Güler,
2012; Aşcı, Gökdemir & Özcan, 2015). The reason behind the women’s choices women in this
situation may be the fact that these methods provide quick relief, although they do not help
eliminate the problem in the long run.
Studies in the literature suggest a relationship between PMS and numerous variables,
including age (Öztürk, Can, 2008; Kısa, Zeyneloğlu & Güler, 2012), presence of PMS in mother
and sister (Gençdoğan, 2006; Demir, Algül & Güven, 2006; Dickerson, Mazyck & Hunter,
2003), stress (Nisar, et. al., 2008), BMI (Bertone-Johnson, Hankinson, Willett, Johnson &
Manson, 2010; Fujiwara & Nakata, 2007), mother’s educational level and employment status
(Erbil, et. al., 2011), marital status (Demir, Algül & Güven, 2006; Adıgüzel, Taşkın & Danacı,
2007), insufficient knowledge of and negative attitude related to menstruation (Gençdoğan,
2006; Kırcan, et. al., 2012; Erbil, Karaca & Kırış, 2010; Robinson & Swindle, 2000; Kısa,
Zeyneloğlu & Güler, 2012), fast food consumption (Selçuk, Avcı & Yılmaz, 2014), educational
and income level (Demir, Algül & Güven, 2006), smoking and alcohol consumption (Bertone-
Johnson, et. al., 2010), anemia (Erbil, et. al., 2011) and salt consumption (Bianco, et. al., 2014).
In our study, on the other hand, age, weight, income level, fast food consumption, salt
consumptionand presence of anemia were found to be factors which had an effect on PMS.
There are numerous studies investigating the relationship between age and PMS
(Freeman, 2007; Öztürk, Can, 2008; Kısa, Zeyneloğlu & Güler, 2012). It is known that the
severity of symptoms increases with age, decreases with reduced ovarian activity and that
symptoms disappear with menopause. It was found in our study that PMS frequency decreased
with increasing age, which supports the above-mentioned fact.
Increased weight was found to increase PMS risk in our study. A strong correlation
between PMS symptoms and BMI is reported in the literature (Bertone-Johnson, et. al., 2010;
Fujiwara & Nakata, 2007). It is noted that the increase in BMI is directly proportional to swelling
in extremities, abdominal cramps, increased back pain, and therefore, increased PMS symptoms.
While it is stated in the literature that fast food consumption triggers PMS (Selçuk, Avcı
& Yılmaz, 2014), there is no evidence for this information. In our study, the incidence of PMS
was found to be higher among those who consumed fast food. This may be related to increased
fat and saturated fat consumption as a result of eating fast food, which consequently causes
increased BMI. Indeed, the incidence of PMS is higher in those with higher BMI.
The incidence of PMS was found to be higher in those with a low income in our study.
Studies in the literature report that economic status has an effect on PMS (Demir, Algül &
Güven, 2006). This may be associated with the negative effects of having a low income level on
nutrition and general life conditions.
Students with anemia were found to have a higher incidence of PMS in the study. A
study performed with women between the ages of 15-49 reports a higher PMS scale score for
those with anemia (Erbil, et. al., 2011). It is believed that the fatigue and weakness caused by
anemia may increase the severity of PMS symptoms.
Students with a high salt consumption were found to have a higher incidence of PMS.
This may be related to increased water retention due to high salt consumption, which increases
the severity of PMS symptoms. Indeed, one study reports that the severity of PMS symptoms
increases with a higher sodium intake (Bianco, et. al., 2014).
5. Conclusion
It was found in our study that the prevalence of PMS was high among the students, that
factors such as increased weight, low income level, fast food consumption and high salt
consumption led to an increased PMS risk, and that the students had particular difficulty in
coping with certain symptoms (water retention, balance/control issues and autonomic reactions).
On the basis of these results, it is recommended that university students be given information
about the factors affecting PMS (nutrition, exercise, lifestyle, habits etc.), how to cope with
symptoms (relaxation methods, diets, pharmacological methods etc.) and treatments available,
and that they also be encouraged to receive treatment for PMS. It may also be useful to establish
health units which utilize pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods to help students
cope with the symptoms of PMS, which will ensure that students have access to professional
support in their universities.
In the future study the researcher may test of pharmacological and non-pharmacological
methods effectiveness on PMS.
There is no limitation in this study.
References
Adıgüzel, H., Taşkın, E. O., & Danacı, A. E. (2007). The symptomatology and prevalence of
symptoms of premenstrual syndrome in Manisa, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry,
18 (3), 215-222.
Aşcı, Ö., Gökdemir, F., & Özcan, B. (2015). Determining the ways of young girls to cope with
premenstrual and menstrual complaints. International Refereed Journal of
Gynaecological Diseases and Maternal Child Health (JACSD), 3 (1), 16-34.
https://doi.org/10.17367/JACSD.2015312899
Aşcı, Ö., Süt, H. K., & Gökdemir, F. (2016). Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome among
university students and risk factors. Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Nursing Electronic
Journal,9(3).
Bertone-Johnson, E. R., Hankinson, S. E., Willett, W. C., Johnson, S. R., & Manson, J. E.
(2010). Adiposity and the development of premenstrual syndrome. Journal of women's
health, 19(11), 1955-1962. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2128
Bianco, V.,Cestari, A. M., Casati, D., Cipriani, S., Radici, G., & Valente, I. (2014). Premenstrual
syndrome and beyond: lifestyle, nutrition, and personal facts. Minerva
ginecologica, 66(4), 365-375.
Bölükbaş, N., & Tiryaki, N. (2003). Informational attitudes and behaviors of learners about
premenstrual syndrome. Nursing Forum , 6 (3), 44-49.
Daşıkan, Z., Taş, G. Ç., & Sözen, G. (2014). Perimenstrual complaints and related affecting
factors in women in Ödemiş. Journal of Turkish Society of Obstetrics &
Gynecology, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.48726
Demir, B., Algül, L. Y., & Güven, E. S. G. (2006). Investigation of premenstrual syndrome
incidence and associated factors in health care personnel. Turkish Journal Of Obstetrics
And Gynecology, 3(4), 262-70.
Dickerson, L. M., Mazyck, P. J., & Hunter, M. H. (2003). Premenstrual syndrome. American
family physician, 67(8), 1743-1752.
Kırcan, N., Ergin, F., Adana, F., & Arslantaş, H. (2012). The prevalance of premenstrual
syndrome in nursery students and its relationship with quality of life, Journal of Adnan
Menderes University Medical Faculty, 13(1), 19-25.
Kısa, S., Zeyneloğlu, S., & Güler, N. (2012). Prevalence of premenstrual syndrome among
unıversıty students and affectıng factors. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health
Sciences, 1 (4).
Naeimi, N. (2015). The Prevalence and symptoms of premenstrual syndrome under examination.
Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 3:1-8.
Nisar, N., Zehra, N., Haider, G., Munir, A. A., & Sohoo, N. A. (2008). Frequency, intensity and
impact of premenstrual syndrome in medical students. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 18(8),
481-4.
O'Brien, P. S., & Ismail, K. M. (2007). History of premenstrual disorders. The Premenstrual
Syndromes: PMS and PMDD. Informa Healthcare, London, 1-8.
https://doi.org/10.3109/9781435628168
Oo, H. H., Sein, M. T., Mar, O., & Aung, A. (2016). Assessment of premenstrual syndrome
among reproductive aged Myanmar women. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 7(4), 39-
43. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v7i4.13298
Öztürk, Can, H. (2008). Menstrual Cycle Disorders. Women's Health. 1.Baskı.Bedray Press
Publishing, Istanbul, 168-171
Pınar, A., & Öncel, S. (2011). Prevalance of premenstrual syndrome in women in between 15-49
ages (Antalya/Turkey). Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinic in Turkey, 21(4),
227-237.
Robinson, R. L., & Swindle, R. W. (2000). Premenstrual symptom severity: impact on social
functioning and treatment-seeking behaviors. Journal of women's health & gender-based
medicine, 9(7), 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1089/15246090050147736
Rosenfeld, R., Livne, D., Nevo, O., Dayan, L., Milloul, V., Lavi, S., & Jacob, G. (2008).
Hormonal and volume dysregulation in women with premenstrual
syndrome. Hypertension, 51(4), 1225-1230.
https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.107136
Seedhom, A. E., Mohammed, E. S., & Mahfouz, E. M. (2013). Life style factors associated with
premenstrual syndrome among El-Minia University Students, Egypt. ISRN Public
Health, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/617123
Selçuk, K. T., Avcı, D., & Yılmaz, F. A. (2014). The prevalence of premenstrual syndrome
among nursing students and affecting factors. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 5(2), 98-
103. https://doi.org/10.5505/phd.2014.55264
Song, J. E.,Chae, H. J., Jang, W. H., Park, Y. H., Lee, K. E., Lee, S. H., ... & Jung, M. S. (2013).
The relationship between life style, menstrual attitude and premenstrual syndrome in
nursing students. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 19(2), 119-128.
https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.2.119
Sule, S. T., & Ukwenya, J. E. (2007). Menstrual experiences of adolescents in a secondary
school. Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc, 8(1), 7-14.
Tanrıverdi, G., Selçuk, E., & Okanlı, A. (2010). Prevelance of Premenstrual Syndrome in
University Students. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 13(1), 52-7.
Taşkın L. (2009). Reproductive cycle anomalies. Birth and Women's Health Nursing. 9. Edition.
Ankara: System Ofset Printing, 625.
Tolassa, F. W., & Bekele, M. L. (2014). Prevalence, impacts and medical managements of
premenstrual syndrome among female students: cross-sectional study in college of health
sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Women's Health, 14:52.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-14-52
Türkçapar, A. F., & Türkçapar, M. H. (2011). Diagnosis and treatment of premenstrual
syndrome and premenstrual dysphoric disorder: A review.
Clinical Journal of Psychiatry, 14(4).
Yücel, U., Bilge, A., Oran, N., Ersoy, M. A., Gençdoğan, B., & Özveren, Ö. (2009). The
prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and its relationship with depression risk in
adolescents. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 10(1), 55-61.
Yonkers, K. A., &Davis, L. L. (2000). Premenstrual Disphoric Disorder. Comprehensive
Textbook of Psychiatry. 7th edition.Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 1952–
1958.