This document contains a list of cases related to three topics in Constitutional Law II: Procedural Due Process, Substantive Due Process, and Equal Protection. For Procedural Due Process, 20 cases are listed related to judicial and administrative procedural due process. For Substantive Due Process, 21 cases are provided on limitations of governmental power. Finally, 24 cases are listed pertaining to the constitutional right of equal protection under the law. The document appears to be assigning homework for a law student to research these constitutional law cases.
This document contains a list of cases related to three topics in Constitutional Law II: Procedural Due Process, Substantive Due Process, and Equal Protection. For Procedural Due Process, 20 cases are listed related to judicial and administrative procedural due process. For Substantive Due Process, 21 cases are provided on limitations of governmental power. Finally, 24 cases are listed pertaining to the constitutional right of equal protection under the law. The document appears to be assigning homework for a law student to research these constitutional law cases.
This document contains a list of cases related to three topics in Constitutional Law II: Procedural Due Process, Substantive Due Process, and Equal Protection. For Procedural Due Process, 20 cases are listed related to judicial and administrative procedural due process. For Substantive Due Process, 21 cases are provided on limitations of governmental power. Finally, 24 cases are listed pertaining to the constitutional right of equal protection under the law. The document appears to be assigning homework for a law student to research these constitutional law cases.
Homework Procedural Due Process Substantive Due Process Equal Protection
Procedural Due Process: Judicial and Administrative
1. Banco Espanol Filipino v. Palanca 27 Phil 921 (1919).
2. Office of the Court Administrator v. INdar, 669 SCRA 24 (2012). 3. Office of the Court Administrator v. Floro, Jr., 486 SCRA 66 (2006). 4. Rubin v. Corpus-Cabochan, 703SCRA 330 (2013). 5. Fabella v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 110379, 28 Nov. 1997. 6. Vivo v. PAGCOR, G.R. No. 187854, November 2013. 7. Non v. Judge Dames, 185 SCRA 523 (1990). 8. Lao G alias Chia Jr. V. CA, 180 SCRA 756 (1989). 9. Jardaleza v. Sereno, G.R. No. 213181, 19 Aug. 2014. 10. Timbol v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 187854, Feb. 2015. 11. Imbong v. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819, 14 April 2014. 12. Romualdez v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 11 December 2008. 13. People v. Nazario, 165 SCRA 186 (1988) 14. Corona v. United Harbor Pilots, G.R. No. 111953, 12 Dec. 1997. 15. Army and Navy Club v. CA, G.R. No. 110223, 8 April 1997. 16. Summary Dismissal Board v. Torcita, G.R. No. 130442, 06 April 2000. 17. Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148560, 19 Nov. 2001. 18. Gonzales v. NLRC and Ateneo de Davao, G.R. No. 125735, 26 Aug. 1999. 19. Cudia v. Superintendent of the Philippine Military Academy, 751 SCRA 469 (2015). 20. Ylaya v. Gacott, 689 SCRA 452 (2013).
Substantive Due Process
1. U.S. V. Toribio, 15 Phil. 85 (1910). 2. Ynot v. IAC, 148 SCRA 659 (1987). 3. Garcia v. Drilon, G.R. No. 179267, 25 June 2013. 4. Churchill v. Rafferty, 22 Phil 580 (1915). 5. People v. Fajardo, 100 Phil 442 (1958). 6. Fernando v. St. Scholastica College, 693 SCRA 141 (2013) 7. Acebedo Optical Co. v. CA, G.R. No. 100152, 31 March 2000. 8. Loving v. Virginia, 888 US 1 (1967). 9. Lawrence, et. al. V. Texas, 25 June 2002. 10. Obergefell v. Hodges, Nos. 14–556, 14-562, 14-571 and 14–574, 26 June 2015 11. Ermita-Malate Hotel and Motel Operators v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 24693, 31 July 1967. 12. City of Manila v. Judge Laguio, G.R. No. 118127, 12 April 2005. 13. White Light Corporation v. City of Manila, G.R. No. 122846, 20 Jan. 2009. 14. Balacuit v. CFI, 163 SCRA 182 (1988). 15. Magtajas v. Pryce Properties, G.R. No. 111097, 20 July 1994. 16. Bennis v. Michigan, No. 8408729, 04 March 1996. 17. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, et. al., No. 88-1503, 25 June 1990 (Syllabus). 18. Manalo v. PNP Chief, G.R. NO. 178920, 15 OCT. 2007. 19. Lucena Grand Central Terminal, Inc. v. JAC Liner, Inc. G.R. No. 1488339, 23 Feb. 2005. 20. Remman Enterprises, inc. v. Chamber of Real Estate Service, etc., G.R. No. 197676, 04 February 2014. 21. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618.
Equal Protection
1. People v. Cayat, 68 Phil 12, 18 (1939).
1. Dumlao v. COMELEC, 96 SCRA 392 (1980). 2. Goessart v. Cleary 335 US 464 (1948). 3. Ormoc Sugar Central v. Ormoc City (L-23794, 17 Feb 1968). 4. Sison, Jr. V. Ancheta 130 SCRA 654 (1984) 5. Himagas v. People, G.R. No. 113811, 07 Oct. 1984. 6. Phil. Judges Ass’n v. Prado, G.R. No. 105371, 11 Nov. 1993. 7. Tiu v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 127410, 20 Jan. 1999. 8. De Guzman, Jr. et. al. v. COMELEC, G.R. No 129118, 19 July 2000. 9. Philippine Telegraph and Telephone co., v. NLRC, G.R. No. 118978, 23 May 1997. 10. International Alliance v. Quisumbing, G.R. No. 128845, 01 June 2000. 11. Parent v. COA, G.R. No. 162224, 07 June 2007. 12. Central Bank Employees v. Bangko Central, G.R. No. 148208, 15 Dec. 2004. 13. Serrano v. Gallant Maritime Services, G.R. No. 167614, 24 March 2009. 14. Britich American tobacco v. Camacho, G.R. No. 163583, 15 April 2009. 15. Quinto and Tolentino v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 189698, 22 Feb. 2010. 16. Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 17. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U. S. 483, 349 U. S. 294 18. Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U. S. 497 19. Loving v. Virginia, 888 U.S. 1 (1967) 20. Biraogo vs. The Philippine Truth Commission, G.R. No. 192935,07 December 2010. 21. Beltran v. Department of Health, G.R. No. 133640, 25 November 2005 (Equal Protection)- 22. Masqueda v. Pilipino Banana Growers & Export Association, Inc. G.R. Nos. 189185 and 189305, 16 August 2016. 23. Almario v. Executive Secretary, 701 SCRA 269 (2013) 24. People v. Jalosjos, G.R. Nos. 132875-76. 03 February 2000.