A Petition No. /2018
A Petition No. /2018
/2018
versus
2. Dipkunwar Anandrao Mane, alias
Mrs. Dipkunwar Chandrashekhar Mahale,
Age:44, Occupation: service.
R/o. Through Anuradha Anandrao Mane,
1987 E, S/2, Pandit Park Apt.,
Rajarampuri, 9th Lane, Kolhapur, 416008 . ......Opponent
The applicant and the opponent met each other on social network
and after their acquaintance they liked each other and decided to get
married. Later, on the date of 8/5/2005, opponent went to meet
applicant's mother and father. After that, opponent used to contact
applicant’s parents frequently via telephone. Further, the marriage
date of the applicant and opponent was been fixed. As father of
Opponent was not alive the applicant had suo moto agreed to take
and bear total expenses of the wedding. Accordingly, the marriage of
the applicant and the opponent was accomplished in Nashik on
15/9/2005. After the marriage, the applicant had organized reception
program at Hotel Sai Palace at his own expenditure. Also, as
opponent insisted big and grand reception was organized at Kolhapur
by the applicant at his own expenditure.
At the time of marriage, opponent was worn by nearly about 25
tolas of gold ornaments given to the applicant, which included
mangalsura, patlya(bangles), bangles, earrings, nath(nose ring),
necklace, as well as painjan(ankle ornament) and also other silver
ornaments such as virodi jodavi and traditional ornaments. Applicant
also gave Paithani saree and bharjari vastre, as well as some saris
were also gifted as per rituals to opponent’s mother and other
relatives. In this way, the applicant has spent nearly about Rs. 20
lakhs for marriage and couple of receptions, tourism and
honeymoon.
9) The relationship between the applicant and the accused had gone
to beyond repair. On 9/6/2015 Opponent along with the two girls
returned in India. Since then, she is residing with her mother in
Kolhapur. After coming back to India, opponent had decided not to
reside with applicant again, as a result she took along all the things and
material including gold and jewelry, clothes, documents filed everything
in her bag and everything is in her possession. When she returned to
India, she had decided not to associate with the applicant again. But her
aim was to find ways how more and more money can be grabbed from
the applicant and his parents. As part of this, the applicant's father had
opened a PF account in name of applicant and because of its maturity,
applicants father received a cheque of Rs. 5,60,000/- dated 9/8/2015,
opponent took custody of the said cheque and withdrawn the cheque by
herself.
11) The applicant has made many attempts by himself and relatives
to make opponent came and reside with him, but inspite of honest
attempts of applicant nothing positive is achieved yet. The applicant has
returned to India two times for the same reason, and in those two visits
applicant has given nearly Rupees 2,50,000/- for the purpose of
expenditure to the opponent. Since there is no honest wish of the
opponent, she did not return to the applicant. And in the second trip, in
July 2016, opponent gave custody of elder daughter Anjalisha to the
applicant. Not only this, the applicant’s father had sent Maruti 800 car to
Kolhapur to pickup and bring opponent but the opponent took
possession of the vehicle and sent it back the driver. The said car MH 15
15-AS 9040 is still in possession of the opponent.
12) The applicant tried very hard to meet and contact opponent and
Amravi , but opponent refused to have contact with the applicant. Not
only this when elder daughter was contacted with the opponent,
opponent refused to talk with her as well and many times used to
opponent used to fill mind of daughter with negativity by telling bad and
lies about applicant and his parents. And after that she stopped taking
with her as well. Also, opponent is not taking proper care of the child in
her custody and has shown and is showing ignorance towards her
education.
13) The applicant had a honest desire to reside and associate with the
opponent. However, opponent never supported applicant and said that
she is not interested in applicant. The applicant is young; he needs
marital happiness. However, due to the behavior of the opponent he
can’t achieve that happiness also opponent is not interested in applicant
as she is interested in any other person. Opponent has made it clear that
the she doesn’t wish to reside and associate with applicant. Also
opponent has given mental harassment and torture to the applicant and
his parents. And has deprived applicant from getting marital happiness.
Opponent has left applicant and is living separately without any just and
proper reason. Thus, now it seems difficult for applicant and opponent
to reside and associate once again as before. Therefore, the present
application has been filed for getting divorce of the marriage of
applicant and opponent dated 15/09/2005.
8) The applicant and the opponent have been married in Nashik, they
have been registered with the Nashik-Marriage Registrar of Nashik -
4, hence the present application form is filed in this Hon’ble court
and has jurisdiction over it.
5)The applicant and the opponent have not applied for this
application in concurrence with consent.
Dated 10/1/2018 .
Acknowledgement
(Applicant)
Fariest:
1) Exhibit 1 Application,
2) Documents list,
A) Marriage registration certificate,
B) Wedding book,
C) Applicant and opponent wedding photo,
D) Applicant's address Proof Xerox,
3) Address Memo,