Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report of Aggregate
Report of Aggregate
Aggregates defined as inert, granular, and inorganic materials which are consist of stone and
solid stone-like solid. Aggregates also commonly considered as inert because it accounted for 60
to 80 percent of the volume and 70 to 85 of the weight of concrete. Therefore, it is necessary to
emphasis the properties of the aggregates including strength, density, durability, shrinkage, creep
and thermal properties of the concrete. The compressive aggregate strength is the most important
among them to select the aggregates.To obtain a quality concrete mix, the aggregate has to be
clean, hard, free from absorbed chemicals, no presence of clay or fine materials that could cause
the deterioration of concrete.
Aggregates can be classified as two different types, coarse and fine. Coarse aggregates usually
greater than 4.75mm where it retained on a No.4 sieve, while fine aggregate is less than 4.75mm
passing through the No.4 sieve.
Coarse aggregates which are consist of uncrushed gravel or stone are the product of natural
disintegration. Most of the natural aggregates are obtained from the bed rock. Coarse aggregates
are categorised into two groups which are single-size aggregate and graded aggregate. A single-
size aggregate usually based on the nominal size specification. It contains about 85 to 100 percent
of material which passes through that specified size of the sieve and zero to 25 percent of which
retained in the next lower sieve. Meanwhile the graded aggregate consists of more than one single-
size aggregate. The size of the coarse aggregate will affect the strength and workability of the
concrete. Reduction of cement content, water requirement and the reduction of cement of drying
shrinkage will affected by a larger size of coarse aggregate.
Other physical properties of aggregate must be known before mixing concrete to obtain desirable
mixture. These are including shape and texture, size gradation, moisture content,specific gravity,
reactivity, soundness and bulk unit weight.
For the shape and texture of aggregate, it will affect the properties of fresh concrete rather than
hardened concrete. This is because workability of mixture is influenced by smooth, flat or
elongated particles that requiring more water to get a workable concrete. Thus, concrete is more
workable when smooth and rounded aggregate is used instead of rough angular or elongated
aggregate. Example of excellent aggregates which are the natural sands and gravel can be
`
obtained.from riverbeds or seashores. In this, crushed stone will produce much more angular and
elongated aggregates which it has a higher surface to volume ratio, better bond characteristics but
require more cement paste to produce a workable mixture. In an addition, the cement content must
also be increased to maintain the water-cement ratio. With this, flat and elongated particles can be
avoided or limited to about 15 percent by weight of the total aggregate. Unit-weight measures the
volume that graded aggregate and the voids between them will occupy in concrete. The void
content between particles affects the amount of cement paste that requires for the mix meanwhile
an angular aggregate increase the void content. So, larger sizes of well-graded aggregate and
improved grading will decrease the void content.
Besides, absorption and surface moisture of aggregate are measured when selecting aggregate
because the internal structures of aggregate is made up of solid material so that voids may not
contain water. The amount of water in the concrete mixture must be adjusted so that it included
the moisture condition of aggregate.
Gap-graded aggregate are used to obtain uniform textures in exposed aggregate concrete, thus,
close control of mixture proportions is necessary to avoid segregation.
`
OBJECTIVE
APPARATUS
PROCEDURE
A. Sieve Analysis
1. A sample weighed 3000g of coarse aggregate was obtained from the lab.
2. The sieving pans were obtained as required sizes and cleaned.
3. The weight of the empty sieving pans was recorded by weighing scale.
4. The sieving pans then were stacked according to the size from the pan to 3.35mm
opening to the largest opening, 37.50mm, and then placed on the sieve shaker machine.
5. The aggregate sample was poured into the top sieving pan gently.
6. The screw to hold the sieving pan was tighten and the sieve shaker machine was turned
on for 5 minutes. Ensure that the holding screw is tight to avoid from the sieving
machine fall.
7. Each of the pan with the samples in were weighed and the data was recorded in a table.
8. The graph of sieve analysis was plotted according to the data obtained.
B WSSD
ii. B.S.G (SSD) = B−C = W
SSD −WSUB
Where:
11. The absorption percentage was calculated based on the following formula:
B−A WSSD−WOD
a. Absorption percentage (%) = × 100 = × 100
A WOD
`
DATA
Retained Cumulative
Sieve Sieve + Retained Retained Cumulative Cumulative Pass
Size Sieve Aggregate Weight Percentage Weight Percentage Percentage
(mm) (g) (g) (g) (%) (g) (%) (%)
37.50 1584.0 1584.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
20.00 1507.5 2041.5 534.0 17.8 534.0 17.8 82.2
14.00 1362.0 2593.5 1231.5 41.1 1765.5 58.9 41.2
10.00 1339.5 2079.0 739.5 24.7 2505.0 83.5 16.5
6.30 1286.5 1661.0 374.5 12.5 2879.5 96.0 4.0
5.00 1260.5 1327.0 66.5 2.2 2946.0 98.2 1.8
3.35 1319.5 1362.5 43.0 1.4 2989.0 99.6 0.4
pan 767.0 778.0 11.0 0.4 3000.0 100.0 0.0
B WSSD
ii. B.S.G (SSD) = B−C = W
SSD −WSUB
Where:
CALCULATION
GRAPH
120
100
Passing Percentage (%)
80
60 Experiment
British Standard Upper Limit
20
0
0 10 20 30 40
Sieve Size (mm)
DISCUSSION
A. Sieve Analysis
Based on the data recorded as shown in Figure C2-1, the most sample trapped in sieve pan
is 14.00mm in size with 41.1% followed by size 10.00mm with 24.7% of sample retained.
While the least amount is sample with size 37.5mm with 0% of sample retained. Thus, we had
concluded that the we had obtained the sample of coarse aggregate size range of 14.00mm to
10.00mm.
Aggregate that has size of more than 5mm in diameter is categories as coarse aggregate.
After analyzing our result, we found that 98.3% of our sample is coarse aggregate. The other
`
1.7% of the sample was below 5mm in diameter which could not categories as coarse
aggregate.
From the graph shown in Figure C2-2, our sample follows the British Standard grading
which it is in between the upper and lower limit passing sieve. During this experiment in
progress, some error had been taken such as zero error when using the weighing scale. Another
error that we had encountered was some of sample may had lost during the sieving process.
CONCLUSION
Based on the experiment we conducted, the highest percentage of aggregate trapped sized
14.00mm at 41.1%. On the other hand, 2.65 is the bulk specific gravity for the sample and the
apparent specific gravity is 2.61. The percentage of saturation is 2.55 %. Aggregates physical and
characteristic properties may affect on concrete mix properties. By conducting the experiment, the
grading of aggregate can be determined. Its specific gravity is also calculated to obtain the weight
to volume relationships. In order to mix a good concrete, aggregate must me examined properly
as it is one of important material in the mix.
`
REFERENCES
2. Retrieved from
https://www.cement.org/cement-concrete-applications/concrete-materials/aggregates
4. Retrieved from
https://civilblog.org/2014/07/07/how-to-classify-aggregates-according-to-size/
6. Retrieved from
https://www.pavementinteractive.org/reference-desk/testing/aggregate-tests/coarse-
aggregate-specific-gravity/
7. Dr. Aslan Al-Omari, Materials of Construction, retrieved from
http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/aslam/Aslam%20Courses/Chapter%203_Construction%20Mater
ials.pdf
8. Roy Whitlow (2004). Basic Soil Mechanics. Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd.
9. Doran, D. (1992). Construction Materials Reference Book. Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
10.