Ontology and Epistemology: Edmund Husserl
Ontology and Epistemology: Edmund Husserl
Ontology: The branch of metaphysics (philosophy concerning the overall nature of what
things are) is concerned with identifying, in the most general terms, the kinds of things
that actually exist. In other words addressing the question: What is existence? and What is
the nature of existence? When we ask deep questions about "what is the nature of the
universe?" or "Is there a god?" or "What happens to us when we die?" or "What principles
govern the properties of matter?" we are asking inherently ontological questions.
Epistemology: The branch of philosophy concerned with the nature of knowledge itself, its
possibility, scope, and general basis. More broadly: How do we go about knowing things? or
How do we separate true ideas from false ideas? or How do we know what is true? or "How can we
be confident when we have located 'truth'?" "What are the systematic ways we can determine
when something is good or bad?"
So ontology is about what is true and epistemology then is about methods of figuring out
those truths.
The split between Plato and Aristotle is both ontological and epistemic. The
split between religion and science is both ontological and epistemic. For example,
religion and science offer two very different ontologies (theories about what is out there) and
epistemology (ways to figure out what is out there). And the split between Plato and
Aristotle matches exactly the split between religion and science...and you should
leave this class understanding why and how! See Plato vs. Aristotle
Ontology is the theory of objects and their ties. It provides criteria for
distinguishing different types of objects (concrete and abstract, existent and
nonexistent, real and ideal, independent and dependent) and their ties
(relations, dependencies and predication).
We can distinguish: a) formal, b) descriptive and c) formalized ontologies.
a) Formal ontology was introduced by Edmund Husserl in his Logical
Investigations (1): according to Husserl, its object is the study of the genera of
being, the leading regional concepts, i.e., the categories; its true method is the
eidetic reduction coupled with the method of categorial intuition. The
phenomenological ontology is divided into two: (I) Formal, and (II) Regional, or
Material, Ontologies.
The former investigates the problem of truth on three basic levels: (a) Formal
Apophantics, or formal logic of judgments, where the a priori conditions for the
possibility of the doxic certainty of reason are to be sought, along with (b) the
synthetic forms for the possibility of the axiological, and (c) "practical" truths. In
other words it is divided into formal logic, formal axiology, and formal praxis.
In contemporary philosophy, formal ontology has been developed in two
principal ways. The first approach has been to study formal ontology as a part of
ontology, and to analyze it using the tools and approach of formal logic: from
this point of view formal ontology examines the logical features of predication
and of the various theories of universals. The use of the specific paradigm of the
set theory applied to predication, moreover, conditions its interpretation.
This approach is best exemplified by Nino Cocchiarella; according to whom
"Formal Ontology is the result of combining the intuitive, informal method of
classical ontology with the formal, mathematical method of modern symbolic
logic, and ultimately of identifying them as different aspects of one and the same
science. That is, where the method of ontology is the intuitive study of the
fundamental properties, modes, and aspects of being, or of entities in general,
and the method of modern symbolic logic is the rigorous construction of formal,
axiomatic systems, formal ontology, the result of combining these two methods,
is the systematic, formal, axiomatic development of the logic of all forms of
being. As such, formal ontology is a science prior to all others in which particular
forms, modes, or kinds of being are studied." (2)
The second line of development returns to its Husserlian origins and analyses
the fundamental categories of object, state of affairs, part, whole, and so forth, as
well as the relations between parts and the whole and their laws of dependence
-- once all material concepts have been replaced by their correlative form
concepts relative to the pure 'something'. This kind of analysis does not deal
with the problem of the relationship between formal ontology and material
ontology." (3).
b) Descriptive ontology concerns the collection of information about the list of
objects that can be dependent or independent items (real or ideal).
c) Formalized ontology attempts to constructs a formal codification for the
results descriptively acquired at the preceding levels.
Notes
(1) "To the best of my knowledge, the idea of a formal ontology makes its first
literary appearance in Volume I of my Logische Untersuchungen (1900),
[Chapter 11, The Idea of Pure Logic] in connexion with the attempt to explicate
systematically the idea of a pure logic -- but not yet does it appear there under
the name of formal ontology, which was introduced by me only later.
The Logische Untersuchungen as a whole and, above all, the investigations in
Volume II ventured to take up in a new form the old idea of an a priori ontology
-- so strongly interdicted by Kantianism and empiricism -- and attempted to
establish it, in respect of concretely executed portions, as an idea necessary to
philosophy." E. Husserl, Formal and Transcendental Logic (1929), English
translation: The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff 1969, p. 86.
(2) Formal Ontology, in: Barry Smith, Hans Burkhardt (eds.), Handbook of
Metaphysics and Ontology, Munich: Philosophia Verlag 1991 p. 640.
(3) Liliana Albertazzi, Formal and Material Ontology, in: Roberto Poli, Peter
Simons (eds.), Formal Ontology, Dordrecht: Kluwer 1996, p. 199 (notes
omitted).
Major Ontologists
The main intellectual links from the major ontologists of Nineteenth
century: Bernard Bolzano (1781-1848), Franz Brentano (1838-1917), and Gottlob
Frege (1848-9125) to contemporary thinkers are traced in the "Table of
Ontologists":
For details see Table of Ontologists of 19th and 20th Centuries
Detailed information (bibliographies, abstract of relevant publications, and
selections of critical judgments) for the thinkers mentioned in the Table of
Ontologists are partly available and will be completed in the near future; I will
publish also pages in French and Italian with selections of critical studies
available in these languages, but not translated in English.
An important feature of this site will be the bibliographies about the history of
ontology, selected authors and ontological topics that have not yet been covered
in such detail; bibliographical entries will not only include the most relevant
books, but also a selection of articles from about one hundred philosophical
reviews; attention will be paid to the relations with logic, semantics and
semiotics, in particular to the theories of predication and reference and to the
relation between thought, language and the world.
The completion of this job will require some years; more than 15,000
bibliographic references are already available in the following languages, in
decreasing order of frequency: English, French, German, Italian, Spanish,
Portuguese; the Bibliographies will be constantly expanded and updated, and
new abstracts of existing entries will be added.
I wish to apologize to readers of other languages, not included only because of
my limited knowledge of foreign languages (my mother tongue is Italian), but I
hope that students and researchers will find sufficient material for a more
thorough study and will enjoy discovering many philosophical treasures, some
little known, but in no way less significant.