Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Attorney License Fraud
Attorney License Fraud
DOWNLOAD:
https://www.hightail.com/download/ZUczQ1ZucVh0d0ZEZU1UQw
Referring to the Utah "judge" caught "practicing law without a license", now
a nominee for federal judicial office. What's strange about this case is that
there is no such thing as a "license" to practice law. They are "admitted" into
practice. Who issues them a license? The BAR? Please see information
below.
Medina
It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been
perpetrated on the people of Texas and America. The American Bar is an
offshoot from London Lawyers’ Guild and was established by people with
treasonous goals in mind. They have accomplished 98% of their goals. The
NEW WORLD ORDER is in the saddle NOW. American People start the job
for them...or before their "NEW WORLD ORDER" bosses, the International
Bankers, gain the remaining 2%. Texas and American Lawyers should check
historical records. They will find that the first people "ELIMINATED" in a
power shift (no matter who whines) are the lawyers and judges...for they
always have proven
themselves unworthy of any trust from either side!
"Woe unto you (A woe is a curse) Lawyers! For you have taken away
the key of knowledge; you entered not in yourselves, and them that were
entering in you hindered…" Luke 11:52.
VI. The AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION TRAITORS IN OUR MIDST:
The founding Fathers who wrote our Constitution and formed our
government, made it very clear that this was to be a FREE ENTERPRISE
country and all Citizens are to be equal under Law and not a private
capitalistic monopoly or cartel as they had experienced in Europe.
Under free enterprise system, any Citizen who was willing to risk his
time and
finances, can go into business. The public with the freedom of choice, can
patronize this business or decide they don't like the service or product and
stay away; whereas, in a private or a capitalistic system, only the privileged
elite can go into certain businesses or professions such as had been practiced
in Europe for ages, making the public their CAPTIVE CUSTOMERS.
The EUROPEAN BANKERS and FINANCIAL CARTELS decided to
change AMERICA to the same system that they had so they could take over
this government too, and sent some British lawyers over here to organize an
American Bar Association on the same order as the English Bar where only
Lords can be Judges and determine who shall practice law.
In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of
Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of
lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful
union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key
positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois
became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the
United States of America.
VII. The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states
and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it
would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its
bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from
the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states
and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act
became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives. Under this system,
the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class
against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR
ASSOCIATION to favor the right and
have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws.
What is the real difference between the dreaded "Klansman" in white
robes and fiery crosses and the ABA "Klansmen" in the BLACK ROBES
sitting on the bench? Aren’t they as dictatorial as the KGB and the
GESTAPO are accused of being? This has fulfilled Orwell's prediction for
1984 and made it a fact, THE BLACK ROBE CULT.
Various groups that have been lawfully stoned walled by the ABA and
the courts suggest we join hands and file an initiative to abolish the Bar
Association as there are 17 states where Citizens have the Right to do this by
the voting process. If we can do this it will destroy, the power of the BAR in
America with similar method they used to gain their power, state by state.
Any Citizens who live in one of these 17 states, can do this, and if not in one
of these states you can contribute to other states that can.
Who is going to run the Courts and practice law if we outlaw the BAR?
The
CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW COURTS and COMMON LAW non-
Union COUNSELORS. I would like to remind you that the Constitution was
written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in
plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and
not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list.
Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and
understand them without any trouble. The public in California was shocked
to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar
Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or
hold Bar examinations.
They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association
accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the
students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called
license but keeps the fees for themselves.
The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also
select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various
other offices in the State.
Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove
any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not
change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar.
On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State
Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated
in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before
they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and
Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and
For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The
People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers.
This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is
incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of
California or any other state.
The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the
people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining
the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said,
in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws
and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of
Europe."
The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than
they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America.
Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly
given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation.
Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the
American
people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have
usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY
HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put
out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.
We cannot hope to reclaim our Country if we continue to let that beast
stay in our bed and in our homes. It is imperative that we remove this demon
from its throne and put OUR CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW
COURTS and JUSTICE SYSTEM, back into effect. We must stop worrying
about what someone else will think, this is our country and we have foreign
entities attempting to take control of us and our Nation.
These children of Satan have nothing good in store for any of us, and
those who are ignorant enough to believe their lies, deceit, and conspiracy,
deserve just what they receive because they ask for it.
IX. MOST LAWYERS are OUR ENEMY:
The small handful that are good must get on the right side and help us
win our war, or they are not on our side. There can be no more sitting on the
fence, people must decide which side they are on and fight.
Lawyers that claim to be on our side and are later found out to be
traitors, must be put to death as this is just what they have planned for all
Americans, who do not abide by their rules and regulations. Americans
cannot win the war if they allow traitors to infiltrate our tanks and get away
with it. The enemy Americans are fighting is a deadly enemy, that care
nothing for anyone out of their own ranks, and if you turn your back on them,
you could be their next victim.
Author Unknown
~~~~~~~
As Mr. Adask pointed out in his article, this non-issued "license" which all
judges and attorneys are "deemed" to have, furthers the independent, non-
accountable grip the private BAR associations have on the judicial branch of
government. Our Idaho Constitution doesn't require any "license to practice
law."
Subpeona
The Idaho State Bar ignored my first letter seeking a copy of the Prosecutor
Payne's and Magistrate McGee's "license to practice law," so I issued a
Subpoena Duces Tecum demanding either a copy of their licenses or a letter
on their letterhead stating that they did not have a license to practice law.
The Idaho State Bar responded by sending a letter on its letterhead stating:
"The Idaho State Bar does not have physical "licenses to practice law" for our
members, so I am unable to provide you with copies. However, I can give
you the following information: Douglas Paul Payne is an active member in
good standing of the Idaho State Bar. He is currently licensed to practice law
in Idaho.
Daniel J. McGee is also a member in good standing of the Idaho State Bar.
He is currently a judge in the state and, therefore, does not practice law.
Motion To Dismiss
I then incorporated this in a Motion to Dismiss and filed it with the court
(Benewah
county case number CR 97-00407). Excerpting from my Affidavit in Support
of Motion to Dismiss:
Both Prosecutor Douglas Paul Payne and Magistrate Daniel J. McGee do not
have
"licenses to practice law," as required by statute to hold and conduct the
public offices which each officer has assumed. This fact is further evidenced
in Exhibit B, a true and correct copy of a letter from Annette Strauser,
Membership Administrator for the Idaho State Bar, attached hereto.
Idaho Code 31-2601 requires that the Prosecuting Attorney be "... an attorney
and counselor at law duly licensed to practice as such in the district courts of
this state..."
To follow up this letter and clarify its contradictory statements, which first
states that there are no "licenses to practice law" and then states that Douglas
Paul Payne “is currently licensed to practice law in Idaho." I called the Idaho
Supreme Court and Annette Strauser, on the morning of April 22, 1998.
In my phone call to the Idaho Supreme Court I was informed, by the several
clerks that I talked to, that when a new attorney passes the bar exam and is
sworn in at the Supreme Court, then the Supreme Court issues a Certificate of
Admission.
I then called Annette Strauser to confirm this process and to try get a better
explanation as to how an attorney can be "licensed to practice law" when
there are no "licenses to practice law.” Strauser confirmed that the process
described by the Supreme Court clerks to admit a new attorney to the bar was
correct.
Strauser further explained that the "license" for an attorney was different
than, for example, a hunting or fishing license, which was an actual paper
license. Strauser told me to think of an attorney's license "as a state of being."
Strauser also stated that to become a member of the bar and maintain status
as a member in good standing, an attorney must pay membership fees,
provide information about any trust accounts they may have, and
occasionally participate in continuing legal education requirements.
I have also learned from prior phone conversations with the Idaho State Bar,
that the BAR is a private association, not a governmental entity or office.
From the evidence and information that I have been able to gather thus far, an
attorney’s "license to practice law" is not any kind of bona fide "license," but
rather a certificate of membership in a private non-governmental association,
which makes some attempt at self regulating its members. At best, it may be
an "implied license," and best was described by Idaho State Bar Membership
Administrator Strauser "as a state of being."
Implied license: "One which is presumed to have been given from the acts of
the party authorized to give it."
Black's Law, Sixth Edition offers the following relevant definitions of Duly:
"In due or proper form or manner; according to legal requirements.
Regularly; properly; suitable; upon a proper foundation, as distinguished
from mere form; according to law in both form and substance."
Idaho Code 9-101, states that "Courts take judicial notice of...[t]he true
signification of all English words and phrases, and of legal expressions."
The ACCUSED contends that as offices of public trust, the Prosecutor which
must be "duly licensed" and the attorney magistrate who is to be "currently
licensed" as required in the Idaho Code sections, must have a bona fide
license, not an "implied license" which, as has been shown herein, is nothing
more than a certificate of membership in a private association, which the
Membership Administrator of said association has told me to think of an
Attorney's license "as a state of being."
The charges in the instant case against the ACCUSED should be dismissed
because the prosecutor is not "duly licensed" to practice law, and the
magistrate is not “currently licensed to practice law," therefore both are not in
compliance with the statutory requirements of their respective offices.
Final Outcome
And what result can one expect when one presents a Motion to Dismiss like
this one to the local magistrate court? Magistrate McGee refused at two
different hearings to allow this motion to be argued. At the first hearing,
while not allowing me to make any argument on the motion, Magistrate
McGee made a prosecutorial argument from the bench against the merits of
the motion.
And what argument could he have made against this motion, you might ask?
The kind that has been all too common in the continuing saga of my right to
travel case: Sheer avoidance of the facts and the law.
Make money, help your country and support The Idaho Observer at the same
time by signing up as a NORFED Redemption Center.
~~~~~~~
Phone: 208-255-2307
Email: [email protected]
Web:
http://idaho-observer.com
http://proliberty.com/observer/
~~~~~~~