Cervical Evaluation ACOG
Cervical Evaluation ACOG
Cervical Evaluation
From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine
Helen Feltovich, MD, MS
Since ancient times, cervical assessment for predicting timing of delivery has relied primarily on
digital (subjective) assessment of dilatation, softening, and length. To date, transvaginal
ultrasound cervical length is the only one of these parameters that meets criteria for a biomarker;
no objective, quantitative measure of cervical dilatation or softening has gained clinical
acceptance. This review discusses how the cervix has been assessed from ancient times to the
present day and how a precision medicine approach could improve understanding of not only
the cervix, but also parturition in general.
(Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:51–63)
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002106
Dilatation
Soranus taught that a midwife should do frequent
intrapartum examinations to monitor progress of
labor.14 Similarly, the Friedman labor curves were
based on digital appreciation of dilatation, although
Dr. Friedman himself was keen to find something
Fig. 1. Earliest known diagram of the uterus (9th century more objective and quantitative than the practitioner’s
CE). Based on drawings of Soranus of Ephesus (1st and 2nd finger. Toward this end, he and others developed
centuries CE), the original gynecologist. Reprinted from cervimeters. These were instruments based on electri-
Weindler F. Geschichte der gynäkologisch-anatomischen
abbildung, von dr. Fritz Weindler.Mit 122 in den text cal, mechanical, magnetic, or ultrasonic principles,
gedruckten abbildungen. Dresden, Zahn & Jaensch; 1908. which used calipers, strings, electromagnetic coils, or
Courtesy of the National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD. ultrasound transducer crystals affixed to the cervix
Feltovich. Cervical Evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 2017. and coupled to some means, outside the vagina, of
recording dilatation.17 An example is Friedman’s
1956 device: proximally, bulldog clips affixed the cal-
This recommendation, of course, was because she ipers to the cervix while the handles on the distal end
performed vaginal examinations. The vaginal were connected to a centimeter rule that depicted cer-
approach to cervical examination was status quo for vical diameter (Fig. 2). Electromagnetic cervimeters
nearly two millennia, until Semmelweiss’ 1847 discov- used induction coils attached to opposite sides of the
ery of the etiology of puerperal fever, after which cervix to create a magnetic field that allowed calcula-
rectal examination was proposed to avoid infection tion of the distance between them, and an ultrasonic
from direct contact with the cervix.15 The rectal device was based on the same principle but instead
approach gained rapid and wide favor, but most preg- used two tiny ultrasound transducers. The problem
nant women did not approve, and in the 1930s, British with these devices was that they easily fell off the
midwives protested that rectal cervical examination is cervix. Even when they remained affixed, they dem-
undesirable because it is painful, increases infection onstrated no advantage over digital evaluation17 and
risk resulting from proximity of the cervix to the rec- so they disappeared by the 1980s, leaving practi-
tum, and makes accurate assessment of dilatation dif- tioners with nothing but their fingers to measure
ficult in addition to which assessing the laboring dilatation.
cervix at all is unnecessary because it does not change
the outcome or speed delivery (Penny W. Letter to the Length
editor. Br Med J 1930.). An obstetrician of the time Unlike dilatation, cervical length can be objectively
countered that intrapartum examination is absolutely quantified and accurately, reliably, and reproducibly
necessary: “How else can he (the practitioner) judge, measured. This measurement is called transvaginal
with any approach to accuracy, when to go away (and ultrasound cervical length. Furthermore, interventions
for how long) and when to stay” (Penny, Br Med J). that reduce risk of spontaneous preterm birth based
He added that a rectal examination is more efficient on transvaginal ultrasound cervical length are available
than vaginal because it does not require gloves or and effective in appropriately selected patients (cerc-
handwashing. In 1986, a randomized controlled trial lage, vaginal progesterone), which makes transvaginal
(RCT) comparing the typical rectal with alternative ultrasound cervical length an effective screening test.
vaginal examination (n5307) reported no difference For these reasons, the College and the SMFM
Screening
Recommended: routine transvaginal ultrasound cer-
vical length screening for women with a singleton
pregnancy and history of prior spontaneous preterm
birth (grade 1A)*
Reasonable but not mandatory: transvaginal ultra-
sound cervical length screening in women without
prior preterm birth (Level B)†
Fig. 2. Friedman’s 1956 cervimeter. Proximally, bulldog
clips affixed the calipers to the cervix while the handles on
Therapeutic Options for a Short Cervix at 16–24 Weeks
the distal end were connected to a centimeter rule that
of Gestation (Level A Evidence)
depicted cervical diameter. Modified from van Dessel T,
Frijns JH, Kok FT, Wallenburg HC. Assessment of cervical Offer progesterone supplementation at 16–24 weeks
dilatation during labor: a review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol of gestation to a woman with a history of singleton
Reprod Biol 1991;41:165–71, Ó1991, with permission spontaneous preterm birth regardless of transvaginal
from Elsevier. cervical length†
Feltovich. Cervical Evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 2017. Consider vaginal progesterone if transvaginal cervi-
cal length is 20 mm or less at or before 24 weeks of
recommend screening of all women with singleton ges- gestation in a woman without a history of preterm
birth†
tation and a history of spontaneous preterm birth Consider cerclage if transvaginal cervical length is
(grade 1A evidence)3 (Box 1). The societies also rec- less than 25 mm before 24 weeks of gestation in
ommend that ultrasonographers and practitioners at a woman with a history of preterm birth before 34
screening facilities undergo specific training in acquisi- weeks of gestation‡
tion and interpretation of transvaginal ultrasound cer- *Data from Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM),
vical length (grade 2B evidence)3 because of the risk of McIntosh J, Feltovich H, Berghella V, Manuck T. The role of
inappropriate treatment decision-making resulting routine cervical length screening in selected high- and
low-risk women for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet
from inaccurate measurement (Box 2). Although the Gynecol 2016;215:B2–7.
societies do not recommend screening in low-risk pop- †Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Practice
ulations, they note that a policy of universal screening Bulletin No. 130. American College of Obstetricians
and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:
may be considered because vaginal progesterone re- 964–73.
duces the risk of spontaneous preterm birth in unse- ‡Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency.
lected women with a short transvaginal ultrasound Practice Bulletin No. 142. American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol
cervical length.3 For instance, a large retrospective 2014;123:37–9.
cohort study of low-risk (singleton gestation, no previ-
ous preterm birth) nulliparous or multiparous women
who delivered at a single tertiary institution between
2007 and 2014 demonstrated a decreased incidence of
spontaneous preterm birth after the 2011 initiation of
a universal transvaginal ultrasound cervical length Box 2. Training for Transvaginal Ultrasound
screening program (incidence of spontaneous preterm Cervical Length
birth at less than 37 weeks of gestation 6.7% compared
Cervical Length Education and Review (CLEAR),
with 6.0%, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.82, 95% confi- a U.S.-based program sponsored by the Society for
dence interval [CI] 0.76–0.88).18 However, a prospec- Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Perinatal Quality Foun-
tive, observational cohort study of more than 9,000 dation (https://clear.perinatalquality.org)
nulliparous women with singleton gestation recruited Fetal Medicine Foundation Certificate of Competence
from eight sites across the United States between 2010 in cervical assessment (https://fetalmedicine.org)
and 2014 (the NICHD’s Nulliparous Pregnancy Out- Data from Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM),
comes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be) suggested McIntosh J, Feltovich H, Berghella V, Manuck T. The role of
that transvaginal ultrasound cervical length screening routine cervical length screening in selected high- and low-
risk women for preterm birth prevention. Am J Obstet
cannot be recommended in nulliparous women Gynecol 2016;215:B2–7.
because of its low predictive value for spontaneous
Fig. 3. A simplified schematic of a systems biology approach to precision medicine for parturition. The left portion of the
figure shows a theoretical framework of parturition. Continual interaction of multiple maternal and fetal factors (intrinsic and
extrinsic) contributes to activation or quiescence of codependent pregnancy tissues to determine the ultimate parturition
phenotype. The middle and right portions of the figure show identification of quantitative biomarkers (using imaging
and minimally invasive acquisition of biospecimens), which leads to identification of molecular processes through bio-
informatics, which in turn leads to mathematical and computational modeling of molecular processes and their bio-
mechanical and microstructural effects, through which the molecular signature of parturition is revealed. This could allow
precise targeting of specific therapies for abnormal parturition. BMI, body mass index. The mathematical and computational
modeling portion of the figure is reprinted with permission from House M, Feltovich H, Hall TJ, Stack T, Patel A, Socrate S.
Three-dimensional, extended field-of-view ultrasound method for estimating large strain mechanical properties of the cervix
during pregnancy. Ultrason Imaging 2012;34:1–14.
Feltovich. Cervical Evaluation. Obstet Gynecol 2017.