Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Motion For Reconsideration: Office of The City Prosecutor
Motion For Reconsideration: Office of The City Prosecutor
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
National Prosecution Service
OFFICE OF THE CITY PROSECUTOR
El Salvador City, Misamis Oriental
-versus-
10. That the allegations that the respondent used for herself
the funds appearing in check nos. 0002239679 and
0002769005 are also not true. In support of the allegations
the complainant adduced the Checks, Disbursement
Vouchers, Purchase Request, Purchase Order, Abstract of
Canvass and Barangay Resolution No. 8-s-2016. Again, the
signatures are authentic in these documents; the respondent
was the one who prepared them and assisted in the signing
by the persons in interest. In the Abstract of Canvass alone
where signatures of the Barangay Captain, BAC Chairman
and three BAC members are required, it is illogical therefore
to say that their signatures were forged or the supposed
activity did not actually occur.
13. That it is not true that the respondent pocketed the amount
appearing in Check No. 0002769006 Php 20,296.57. The
members of CVO have received the uniforms on June 1,
2016 contrary to the allegation of Bonifacio M. Mangayan.
This is manifested in a document signed by the CVO
members after receiving the uniforms. Copy of such
document is hereto attached and marked as Annex “1”.
15. That the complainant did not include in his complaint some
relevant documents relating to the questioned checks such
as but not limited to Purchase Request, Request for
Quotation, Inspection and Acceptance Report and Original
Official Receipts. He was selective in presenting the
documents. The documents would have been helpful in
determining the innocence of the respondent but the
complainant refrained to include them knowing that it is
prejudicial to his malevolent complaints;