Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 7
Unit 7
UNIT STRUCTURE
7.2 INTRODUCTION
The word ‘biography’ is derived from Greek ‘bios’, meaning ‘life’ and
‘graphy’, meaning ‘writing’. So literally, the term ‘biography’ means ‘writing
about life’. However, biography is not like history or a chronicle of events
of a man’s life. It is more artistic and has a personal and psychological
touch. The history of biography can be traced back to post-classical Europe
which kept records of the lives of peoples called “Lives of the Saints” or
Hagiographies. You must note that medieval historians like Geoffrey of
Monmouth, Mathew Prince and others, expressed their concern over
human failings and strengths. But, it is not until the 16th century that the
first true biography appeared. Cardinal Norton’s Life of Richard III (1513),
Roper’s Life of More (1535) and Cavendish’s Life of Wolsey (1554-7) are
often considered to be the first real examples of biographical writings.
th
This tradition of writing biographies continued till the 17 century with
Francis Bacon’s Life of Henry VIII (1621), Walton’s Lives (1640-78), and
Aubrey’s Minutes of Lives (1669-1693). But, it is with Dr. Johnson’s Lives
of the Poets (1779-81) that the form of biography finally established itself
as a major type belonging to the genre of non-fictional prose. For Johnson,
biography stood between the falsehood of fiction and the useless truth of
history. One remarkable aspect of Johnson’s biographical writing is that
Life Writings (Block – 2) 139
Unit 7 Samuel Johnson: “Life of Milton”
he juxtaposes a criticism of the life and works of his subject with the
biographical description. He takes pains to record every detail of the person
whose life he is writing. This was followed by James Boswell’s Life of
Johnson (1791), which turned out to be a model for many biographers in
the subsequent periods.
th
In the 19 century, biographical writings continued to flourish through
Lockhart’s Life of Scott (1837, 1838), Gilchrist’s Life of Blake (1863), but
showing a potential influence on the structure of fiction. Wordsworth’s long
autobiographical poem The Prelude, Dickens’ novels like Great Expectations
along with that of the Bronte sisters, show the intimacy between actual
experience and fictional invention. Finally, the modern idea of ‘critical’
biography was established by Lytton Strachey in his Eminent Victorians
(1918). In very recent times, the claim of the modern biographers is tuned
towards a particular kind of subjectivity. This directly refers to the selection
and presentation of the material. If you are an avid reader, you will notice
that recently, another interest has been shown in the interchangeability of
fictional and documentary techniques. The traditional distinction between
biography, personal history, written in the form of ‘diary’ or ‘confessions’,
and the first person narratives are sought to be questioned. You should
notice how this changing nature of biography has brought about certain
noticeable changes in the genre of biography itself as reflected in the
emergence of ‘Life Writings’ as a major area of research.
Sin and Death, and the inconsistent presentation of the spiritual beings.”
The epic, according to Johnson, “comprises neither human action nor
human manners.” The allegory of Sin and Death also shows the lack of the
poet’s skill. The presentation of the spiritual beings is also confusing; there
is no clear distinction between spirit and matter. Apart from these, Johnson
is also critical about the language and versification of Paradise Lost. As a
neoclassicist, Johnson judged everything from a classical point of view
and had denounced everything that had not conformed to Aristotelian
principles. Regarding Paradise Regained, Johnson pointed out that though
it had many elegant passages and was always instructive it was deficient
in dialogues and action. The poem, in the long run, according to Johnson,
was dull and tedious and failed to please. Samson Agonistes was for him a
failure as drama. It had some beautiful passages and single lines, but its
plot was loose, construction faulty and the characters lacked unity.
Towards the end of the Life of Milton, Johnson gives a balanced and
judicious estimate of Milton as poet. He praises Milton as an epic poet and
discusses his art of versification along with a study of the comparative
merits of rhymed and blank verse. He says that Milton is not the greatest of
the epic poets simply because he is not the first. Milton’s language is
peculiarly his own. It has no resemblance to any earlier writer or the language
in common use. This peculiarity arises from his effort to use words suited
to the grandeur of his subject. However, Milton’s language is sometimes
highly Latinised. Johnson regards this as a fault and comments that Milton
“writ no language but effected a Babylonish jargon.” Johnson, however, felt
that this defect was compensated by his extensive learning, and resulted in
a ‘grace in deformity.’ He praises Milton’s diction for its copiousness and
variety. He credits Milton’ use of blank verse to the influence of the Italian
writers. However, his blank verse has neither the ease of prose nor the
melody of poetry. While admitting that rhyme is not an essential adjunct of
poetry he maintains that poets in other languages might have dispensed
with the rhyme, but it is essential for the English language. Johnson praises
Milton’s skill in handling the blank verse but warns that Milton is a poet to be
admired but not imitated. Milton’s genius is apparent in his art of narration,
in the texture of his plot, and the immense variety of dialogues and incidents.
Although he is not free from Homeric influences, he shows originality in
every page of his best works. He wrote according to his own light, fearless,
confident and undeterred by difficulties.
Comments on the personality and character of Milton are scattered
throughout the pages of Life of Milton. Like the criticism of Milton’s works,
the evaluation of his character is also not free from prejudices. Johnson
points out that as a young man Milton was active and vigorous and his
domestic habits were those of a devoted scholar. Although he was a
disciplinarian in his daily routines, he was not much of an expert in financial
matters and ended his days in near poverty. Johnson felt that Milton was
not interested in the established forms of religion. Milton’s political views
were Republican and the expression of his views was usually violent. While
appreciating Milton’s independent mind at a time when there was strong
domination of sectarianism, Johnson condemns it by saying that it is not
development but changing one’s principles according to one’s convenience.
Johnson had doubts regarding Milton’s political beliefs. Johnson writes, “he
hated all whom he was required to obey. It is to be suspected that his
predominant desire was to destroy rather than to establish, and he felt not
so much the love of liberty as repugnance to authority.” However, Johnson
praises Milton for his strong determination and capability to work in adverse
circumstances. Johnson did not attempt to idealise the character of Milton.
He does not hesitate to ridicule Milton at certain times and maintains the
poet was unnecessarily fond of controversies and an opportunist at times.
The minute details of Milton’s habits and character makes the work more
interesting and realistic at the same time.
Boswell’s biography. However, it was only in the 20th century that his writings
regained their prominence.
As you come to the end of this unit, you have learnt that Samuel
Johnson’s Lives of the English Poets marks an important development in
the history of biography. Johnson’s Life of Milton can be regarded as one of
the best sources of his views on poetry. In his “Life of Milton”, Johnson
provides a comprehensive account of Milton’s life by incorporating every
possible detail of his life besides providing important criticism of his greatest
works. You have also learnt that Johnson’s biographies have two distinct
parts–biographical information of the poet and a criticism of his works. And,
this framework makes the Lives not only an important development in
biography writing but also an important source of Milton’s neoclassical
criticism of the English poets.