Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LMT Merc
LMT Merc
Branch of private law that regulates the Section 1. The goals of the national economy
juridical relations arising from commercial are a more equitable distribution of
acts. opportunities, income, and wealth; a sustained
increase in the amount of goods and services
The sources of commercial law are: produced by the nation for the benefit of the
people; and an expanding productivity as the
1. Principal – Statute Law, Agreements, key to raising the quality of life for all,
Customs and Court decisions. especially the underprivileged.
2. Auxilliary – Natural Law, Foreign
Statutory Law and Foreign Court The State shall promote industrialization and
Decisions, and Opinions. full employment based on sound agricultural
development and agrarian reform, through
industries that make full of efficient use of
human and natural resources, and which are
competitive in both domestic and foreign
Page |2
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
markets. However, the State shall protect Section 11. No franchise, certificate, or any
Filipino enterprises against unfair foreign other form of authorization for the operation of
competition and trade practices. a public utility shall be granted except to
citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or
In the pursuit of these goals, all sectors of the associations organized under the laws of the
economy and all region s of the country shall be Philippines, at least sixty per centum of whose
given optimum opportunity to develop. Private capital is owned by such citizens; nor shall such
enterprises, including corporations, franchise, certificate, or authorization be
cooperatives, and similar collective exclusive in character or for a longer period
organizations, shall be encouraged to broaden than fifty years. Neither shall any such
the base of their ownership. franchise or right be granted except under the
condition that it shall be subject to amendment,
xxx alteration, or repeal by the Congress when the
common good so requires. The State shall
Section 6. The use of property bears a social encourage equity participation in public
function, and all economic agents shall utilities by the general public. The participation
contribute to the common good. Individuals of foreign investors in the governing body of
and private groups, including corporations, any public utility enterprise shall be limited to
cooperatives, and similar collective their proportionate share in its capital, and all
organizations, shall have the right to own, the executive and managing officers of such
establish, and operate economic enterprises, corporation or association must be citizens of
subject to the duty of the State to promote the Philippines.
distributive justice and to intervene when the
common good so demands. Section 12. The State shall promote the
preferential use of Filipino labor, domestic
xxx materials and locally produced goods, and
adopt measures that help make them
Section 10. The Congress shall, upon competitive.
recommendation of the economic and planning
agency, when the national interest dictates, Section 13. The State shall pursue a trade
reserve to citizens of the Philippines or to policy that serves the general welfare and
corporations or associations at least sixty per utilizes all forms and arrangements of
centum of whose capital is owned by such exchange on the basis of equality and
citizens, or such higher percentage as Congress reciprocity.
may prescribe, certain areas of investments.
The Congress shall enact measures that will Section 14. The sustained development of a
encourage the formation and operation of reservoir of national talents consisting of
enterprises whose capital is wholly owned by Filipino scientists, entrepreneurs,
Filipinos. professionals, managers, high-level technical
manpower and skilled workers and craftsmen
In the grant of rights, privileges, and in all fields shall be promoted by the State. The
concessions covering the national economy and State shall encourage appropriate technology
patrimony, the State shall give preference to and regulate its transfer for the national
qualified Filipinos. benefit. The practice of all professions in the
Philippines shall be limited to Filipino citizens,
The State shall regulate and exercise authority save in cases prescribed by law.
over foreign investments within its national
jurisdiction and in accordance with its national Section 15. The Congress shall create an
goals and priorities. agency to promote the viability and growth of
cooperatives as instruments for social justice
and economic development.
Page |3
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Section 16. The Congress shall not, except by Section 21. Foreign loans may only be
general law, provide for the formation, incurred in accordance with law and the
organization, or regulation of private regulation of the monetary authority.
corporations. Government-owned or controlled Information on foreign loans obtained or
corporations may be created or established by guaranteed by the Government shall be made
special charters in the interest of the common available to the public.
good and subject to the test of economic
viability.
LETTERS OF CREDIT
Section 17. In times of national emergency,
when the public interest so requires, the State A letter of credit is a written instrument
may, during the emergency and under whereby the writer requests or authorizes
reasonable terms prescribed by it, temporarily the addressee to pay money or deliver
take over or direct the operation of any goods to a third person and assumes
privately-owned public utility or business responsibility for payment of debt therefor
affected with public interest. to the addressee.
Section 18. The State may, in the interest of Two Essential Conditions for a Letter of
national welfare or defense, establish and Credit
operate vital industries and, upon payment of
just compensation, transfer to public A letter of credit is issued in favor of a
ownership utilities and other private definite person and not to order. It is not a
enterprises to be operated by the Government. negotiable instrument governed by the
Negotiable Instruments Law.
Section 19. The State shall regulate or prohibit It is limited to specified amount, which may
monopolies when the public interest so be one or more but always with a maximum
requires. No combinations in restraint of trade amount.
or unfair competition shall be allowed.
If any of the two circumstances is missing, it
Section 20. The Congress shall establish an is not a letter of credit. It is a mere
independent central monetary authority, the recommendation.
members of whose governing board must be
natural-born Filipino citizens, of known Parties to a Letter of Credit
probity, integrity, and patriotism, the majority
of whom shall come from the private sector. 1. Issuer – This is the entity that will issue the
They shall also be subject to such other credit. It usually is a bank but it can be any
qualifications and disabilities as may be financial institution of substance. The issuer
prescribed by law. The authority shall provide assumes the full obligation topay the
policy direction in the areas of money, banking, beneficiary upon the presentation of the
and credit. It shall have supervision over the documents specified in the credit.
operations of banks and exercise such 2. Applicant – The applicant is also known as
regulatory powers as may be provided by law the account party or customer. He requests
over the operations of finance companies and from the issuer the credit he wants for his
other institutions performing similar functions. beneficiary. He pays the issuer for the credit
with cash or collateral so as to secure the
Until the Congress otherwise provides, the issuer the funds necessary for the
Central Bank of the Philippines operating reimbursement obligation to the
under existing laws, shall function as the beneficiary.
central monetary authority. 3. Beneficiary – The beneficiary is the party
that will be identified in the credit as the
Page |4
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
procedures of the credit. Further to this, We emphasize that fraud in its general sense, is
since the adherence of the requirements deemed to comprise anything calculated to
must be strictly applied to the beneficiary, deceive, including all acts, omissions, and
the beneficiary must know precisely and concealment involving a breach of legal duty or
unequivocally what those requirements are. equitable duty, trust, or confidence justly
reposed, resulting in damage to another, or by
3. Fraud Exception Principle -exists when the which an undue and unconscientious
beneficiary, for the purpose of drawing on advantage is taken of another. It is a generic
the credit, fraudulently presents to the term embracing all multifarious means which
confirming bank, documents that contain, human ingenuity can device and which are
expressly or by implication, material resorted to by one individual to secure an
representations of fact that to his advantage over another by false suggestions or
knowledge are untrue. by suppression of truth and includes all
surprise, trick, cunning, dissembling and any
ON LETTER OF CREDIT “INDEPENDENCE unfair way by which another is cheated.
PRINCIPLE”
It is true that ordinarily, in a letter of credit
Where the trial court rendered a decision transaction, the bank merely substitutes its
finding the buyer solely liable to pay the seller own promise to pay for the promise to pay of
and omitted by inadvertence to insert in its one of its customers, who in turn promises to
decision the phrase “without prejudice to the pay the bank the amount of funds mentioned in
decision that will be made against the issuing the letters of credit plus credit or commitments
bank “, the bank cannot evade responsibility fees mutually agreed upon. Once the issuing
based on this ground. The seller who is entitled bank shall have paid the beneficiary after the
to draw on the credit line of the buyer from a latter's compliance with the terms of the letter
bank against the presentation of sales invoices of credit, the issuing bank is entitled to
and official receipts of the purchases and who reimbursement for the amount it paid under
obtained a court judgment solely against the the letter of credit.
buyer even though the suit is against the bank In the present case, however, no
and the buyer may still enforce the liability of reimbursement was made outright, precisely
the same bank under a letter of credit issued to because the letter of credit was secured by a
secure the credit line. The so-called promissory note executed by SPI. The bank
"independence principle" in a letter of credit would have not agreed to this transaction had
assures the seller or the beneficiary of prompt it not been deceived by Gilbert Guy, et al. into
payment independent of any breach of the believing the RMSI and SPI were one and the
main contract and precludes the issuing bank same entity. Guy and his cohorts' acts in (1)
from determining whether the main contract is securing the letter of credit guaranteed by a
actually accomplished or not. (Philippine promissory note in behalf of SPI; and, (2) their
National Bank vs. San Miguel Corporation. act of representing SPI as RMSI's Division, were
G.R. No. 186063, January 15, 2014) indicia of fraudulent acts because they fully
well know, even before transacting with the
Effect of Fraudulent Misrepresentation in bank, that: (a) SPI was a separate entity from
applying and securing an L/C: Smartnet Philippines, the RMSI's Division,
which has the Omnibus Credit Line; and (b)
G.R. No. 187979. April 25, 2012.] despite this knowledge, they misrepresented to
ASIA UNITED BANK, petitioner, vs. GILBERT G. the bank that SPI is RMSI's division. Had it not
GUY, PHILIP LEUNG, KATHERINE L. GUY, for this false representation, AUB would have
RAFAEL H. GALVEZ and EUGENIO H. GALVEZ, not granted SPI's letter of credit to be secured
JR., respondents. with a promissory note because SPI as a
corporation has no credit line with AUB and
SPI by its own, has no credit standing.
Page |6
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Letters of credit were developed for the A trust receipt may be denominated in the
purpose of insuring to a seller payment of a Philippine currency or any foreign currency
definite amount upon the presentation of acceptable and eligible as part of
documents and is thus a commitment by the international reserves of the Philippines,
issuer that the party in whose favor it is issued the provisions of existing law, executive
and who can collect upon it will have his credit orders, rules and regulations to the
against the applicant of the letter, duly paid in contrary notwithstanding: Provided,
the amount specified in the letter. They are in however, That in the case of trust receipts
effect absolute undertakings to pay the money denominated in foreign currency, payment
advanced or the amount for which credit is shall be made in its equivalent in Philippine
given on the faith of the instrument. They are currency computed at the prevailing
primary obligations and not accessory exchange rate on the date the proceeds of
contracts and while they are security sale of the goods, documents or
arrangements, they are not converted thereby instruments held in trust by the entrustee
into contracts of guaranty. What distinguishes are turned over to the entruster or on such
letters of credit from other accessory contracts, other date as may be stipulated in the trust
is the engagement of the issuing bank to pay receipt or other agreements executed
the seller once the draft and other required between the entruster and the entrustee.
shipping documents are presented to it. They
are definite undertakings to pay at sight once Rights of Entruster
the documents stipulated therein are The entruster shall be entitled to the
presented. proceeds from the sale of the goods,
documents or instruments released under a
Page |7
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
trust receipt to the entrustee to the extent The Trust Receipts Law was enacted to
of the amount owing to the entruster or as safeguard commercial transactions and to
appears in the trust receipt; offer an additional layer of security to the
lending bank. Trust receipts are
or to the return of the goods, documents or indispensable contracts in international
instruments in case of non-sale, and to the and domestic business transactions. The
enforcement of all other rights conferred on prevalent use of trust receipts, the danger
him in the trust receipt provided such are of their misuse and/or misappropriation of
not contrary to the provisions of this the goods or proceeds realized from the
Decree sale of goods, documents or instruments
held in trust for entruster banks, and the
Obligations of Entrustee need for regulation of trust receipt
The entrustee shall (1) hold the goods, transactions to safeguard the rights and
enforce the obligations of the parties
documents or instruments in trust for the
involved are the main thrusts of the Trust
entruster and shall dispose of them strictly
in accordance with the terms and Receipts Law.
conditions of the trust receipt; (2) receive The second paragraph of Section 7 provides
the proceeds in trust for the entruster and a statutory remedy available to an entruster
turn over the same to the entruster to the in the event of default or failure of the
extent of the amount owing to the entruster entrustee to comply with any of the terms
or as appears on the trust receipt; (3) and conditions of the trust receipt or any
insure the goods for their total value other agreement between the entruster and
against loss from fire, theft, pilferage or the entrustee. More specifically, the
other casualties; (4) keep said goods or entruster “may cancel the trust and take
proceeds thereof whether in money or possession of the goods, documents or
whatever form, separate and capable of instruments subject of the trust or of the
identification as property of the entruster; proceeds realized therefrom at any time”.
(5) return the goods, documents or The law further provides that “the entruster
instruments in the event of non-sale or in possession of the goods, documents or
upon demand of the entruster; and (6) instruments may, on or after default, give
observe all other terms and conditions of notice to the entrustee of the intention to
the trust receipt not contrary to the sell, and may, not less than five days after
provisions of PD 115. serving or sending of such notice, sell the
goods, documents or instruments at public
Who bears liability in case of loss
or private sale, and the entruster may, at a
The risk of loss shall be borne by the public sale, become a purchaser. The
entrustee. Loss of goods, documents or proceeds of any such sale, whether public
instruments which are the subject of a trust or private, shall be applied (a) to the
receipt, pending their disposition, payment of the expenses thereof; (b) to the
irrespective of whether or not it was due to payment of the expenses of re-taking,
the fault or negligence of the entrustee, keeping and storing the goods, documents
shall not extinguish his obligation to the or instruments; (c) to the satisfaction of the
entruster for the value thereof. entrustee's indebtedness to the entruster.
The entrustee shall receive any surplus but
INC., PERCIVAL G. LLABAN and MANUEL shall be liable to the entruster for any
P. LUCENTE, petitioners, vs. deficiency.”
METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST
COMPANY, respondent. (G.r. No. 159622.
July 30, 2004. Landl & Company (Phil.))
Page |8
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
JESUS V. TIOMICO, petitioner, vs. THE to pay the bank the amount spent for the
HON. COURT OF APPEALS (FORMER purchase of the goods.
FIFTH DIVISION) and PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, respondent (G.R. No.
122539. March 4, 1999.) SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES ON TRUST
The Court has repeatedly upheld the RECEIPTS
validity of the Trust Receipts Law and ON TRUST RECEIPTS
consistently declared that the said law does
not violate the constitutional proscription Can an entrustee invoke the principle of res
against imprisonment for non-payment of perit domino to evade liability under the
debts. The case of People vs. Nitafan held:
Trust Receipts?
"The Trust Receipts Law punishes the
dishonesty and abuse of confidence in the Where the entrustee tendered the return of the
handling of money or goods to the
articles to the entrustee because they did not
prejudice of another regardless of whether
the latter is the owner or not. The law does meet its manufacturing requirements but the
not seek to enforce payment of a loan. Thus, latter refused to accept and as a consequence,
there can be no violation of the right against the entruster stored them in its warehouse
imprisonment for non-payment of a debt." which was, however, gutted by fire, the
entrustee’s obligation was not extinguished
MELVIN COLINARES and LORDINO
VELOSO, petitioners, vs. HONORABLE despite the tender and its invocation of the
COURT OF APPEALS, and THE PEOPLE OF principle of res perit domino. Under the Trust
THE PHILIPPINES, respondents. (G.R. No. Receipts law, the loss of the goods under trust
90828. September 5, 2000.) receipt regardless of the cause and the period
There are two possible situations in a trust or time it occurred, does not extinguish the
receipt transaction. The first is covered by civil obligation of the entrustee. A trust receipt
the provision which refers to money has two features, the loan and security
received under the obligation involving the features. The loan is brought about by the fact
duty to deliver it (entregarla) to the owner that the entruster financed the importation or
of the merchandise sold. The second is purchase of the goods under TR. Until and
covered by the provision which refers to
unless this loan is paid, the obligation to pay
merchandise received under the obligation
to "return" it (devolvera) to the owner. subsists. The principle of res perit domino will
not apply if under the trust receipt, the bank is
Hur Tin Yang vs. People of the made to appear as the owner, it was but an
Philippines. (G.R. No. 195117, August 14, artificial expedient, more of legal fiction than
2013)
fact, for if it were really so, it could dispose of
When both parties entered into an the goods in any manner that it wants, which it
agreement knowing fully well that the cannot do, just to give consistency with the
return of the goods subject of the trust purpose of the trust receipt of giving a stronger
receipt is not possible even without any
security for the loan obtained by the importer.
fault on the part of the trustee, it is not a
trust receipt transaction penalized under To consider the bank as the true owner from
Sec. 13 of PD 115 in relation to Art. 315, the inception of the transaction would be to
par. 1(b) of the RPC, as the only obligation disregard the loan feature thereof. (Rosario
actually agreed upon by the parties would Textiles vs. Home Bankers [2005])
be the return of the proceeds of the sale
transaction. This transaction becomes a
mere loan, where the borrower is obligated
Page |9
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
A contract of insurance is a contract of The agreement has the force of law between
adhesion, thus, any ambiguity should be the parties. The terms of the policy constitute
resolved against the insurer, or it should be the measure of the insurer’s liability, and in
order to recover, the insured must show
construed liberally in favor of the insured
himself within those terms.
and strictly against the insurer.
Rationale for the Rule: If the insured cannot comply with the terms
and conditions of the contract, he is not
entitled as a rule to recover the loss or damage
Limitations of liability should be regarded
with extreme jealousy and must be suffered. This is a condition precedent to the
construed in such a way as to preclude the right to recovery.
insurer from non-compliance with its
• Contracts of insurance, like other
obligations.
contracts, are to be construed according
MALAYAN INSURANCE CORPORATION, to the sense and meaning of the terms
which the parties themselves have used.
petitioner, vs. THE HON. COURT OF
If such terms are clear and
APPEALS and TKC MARKETING
CORPORATION, respondents. (G.R. No. unambiguous, they must be taken and
119599. March 20, 1997) understood in their plain, ordinary and
popular sense. Accordingly, in
interpreting the exclusions in an
Through the years, the courts have held that in
these type of contracts, the parties do not insurance contract, the terms used
bargain on equal footing, the weaker party's specifying the excluded classes therein
participation being reduced to the alternative are to be given their meaning as
understood in common speech. A
to take it or leave it. Thus, these contracts are
contract of insurance is a contract of
viewed as traps for the weaker party whom the
courts of justice must protect. Consequently, adhesion. So, when the terms of the
any ambiguity therein is resolved against the insurance contract contain limitations
on liability, courts should construe them
insurer, or construed liberally in favor of the
in such a way as to preclude the insurer
insured.
from non-compliance with his
GULF RESORTS, INC., petitioner, vs. obligation. (Alpha Insurance and
Surety Co. vs. Castor, GR No. 198174,
PHILIPPINE CHARTER INSURANCE
September 2, 2013)
CORPORATION, respondent. (G.R. No. 156167.
May 16, 2005)
P a g e | 12
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
2. When the insurance is taken by the • Existing Interest – May be legal title
employer on the life of the employee. or equitable title (e.g. Trustee /
Mortgagor / Lessor / Mortgagee)
Insurable Interest in Property
• Inchoate Interest* - Stockholder’s
SECTION 13. Every interest in inchoate interest in properties of the
property, whether real or personal, or any corporation
relation thereto, or liability in respect
thereof, of such nature that a contemplated Inchoate – a legal right or
peril might directly damnify the insured, is entitlement that is only partial and
an insurable interest. incomplete, which may later develop
into a full property right.
SECTION 14. An insurable interest in
property may consist in: Change of Interest
1. Actual Total Loss entitles insured b) Where the policy under which the
to full recovery insured claims is a valued policy, the
insured must give credit as against the
2. Constructive Total Loss when valuation for any sum received by him
insured exercised right of under any other policy without regard
abandonment. This right may be to the actual value of the subject
exercised when the property insured matter insured;
suffers a damage from a marine peril
of at least ¾ if insured merely c) Where the policy under which the
notifies insurer of his exercise of insured claims is an unvalued policy he
right of abandonment, immediately must give credit, as against the full
ownership over damaged property insurable value, for any sum received by
passes to insurer and it pays the him under any policy;
insured as if there is actual total loss.
d) Where the insured receives any sum in
3. Partial Loss carries with it co- excess of the valuation in the case of
insurance; owner shall bear part of valued policies, or of the insurable value
the loss. in the case of unvalued policies, he must
hold such sum in trust for the insurers,
Over Insurance according to their right of contribution
SECTION 82. In case of an over-insurance among themselves;
by several insurers, the insured is entitled e) Each insurer is bound, as between
to a ratable return of the premium, himself and the other insurers, to
proportioned to the amount by which the contribute ratably to the loss in
aggregate sum insured in all the policies proportion to the amount for which he
exceeds the insurable value of the thing at is liable under his contract.
risk.
Reinsurance
There is over insurance when the insured
insures the same property for an amount SECTION 95. A contract of reinsurance is
greater than the value of the property with one by which an insurer procures a third
the same insurance company. person to insure him against loss or liability
by reason of such original insurance.
In case of loss, the company is bound to pay
only to the extent of the real value of the REINSURANCE TREATY AND
property lost. The insured is entitled to REINSURANCE POLICY, DISTINGUISHED.
recover the amount of premium — A reinsurance policy is a contract of
corresponding to the excess in value of the indemnity one insurer makes with another
property. to protect the first insurer from a risk it has
already assumed, while a reinsurance
Double Insurance treaty is merely an agreement between two
SECTION 94. Where the insured is over- insurance companies whereby one agrees
insured by double insurance: to cede and the other to accept reinsurance
business pursuant to provisions specified in
a) The insured, unless the policy otherwise the treaty.
provides, may claim payment from the
insurers in such order as he may select, Reinsurance treaties and reinsurance
up to the amount for which the insurers policies are not synonymous. Treaties are
contracts for insurance while reinsurance
are severally liable under their
policies are contracts of insurance.
respective contracts;
P a g e | 19
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
THE PHILIPPINE AMERICAN LIFE How do you recover from Fire Insurance
INSURANCE COMPANY, petitioner, vs.
THE AUDITOR GENERAL, respondent. 1. Provide NOTICE OF LOSS – this must be
(G.R. No. L-19255. January 18, 1968.) immediately given, unless delay is waived
expressly or impliedly by the insurer; and
SECTION 96. Where an insurer obtains
reinsurance, except under automatic 2. Provide PROOF OF LOSS – based on best
reinsurance treaties, he must communicate evidence obtainable, unless delay is waived
all the representations of the original expressly or impliedly by the insurer.
insured, and also all the knowledge and Measure of Indemnity
information he possesses, whether
previously or subsequently acquired, which 1. OPEN POLICY – entitled to recover only the
are material to the risk. expense necessary to replace the thing lost
or injured in the condition it was at the time
SECTION 97. A reinsurance is presumed to of the injury.
be a contract of indemnity against liability,
and not merely against damage. 2. VALUED POLICY – the parties are bound by
the valuation, in the absence of fraud or
SECTION 98. The original insured has no mistake.
interest in a contract of reinsurance.
X constructed a house for which he spent
Fire Insurance P300,000.00 which he insured against fire
Sections 167 – 173, Insurance Code for the same amount. When built, the house
was already worth P600,000.00. However,
A contract by which the insurer for a one day, 1/5 of the house was destroyed by
consideration agrees to indemnify the accidental fire. How much can X recover ?
insured against loss of, or damage to,
property by hostile fire, including lss by If policy is an open policy, X can recover
lighting, windstorm, tornado or earthquake, his actual loss of P120,000.00, which is
and other allied risks, when such risks are 1/5 of P600,000.00, the value of the
covered by extension to fire insurance property at the time of loss.
policies or under separate policies. (Section If the policy is a valued policy, and the
167) house was valued at P300,000.00, X can
The presence of heat, steam, or even smoke recover only 1/5 of P300,000.00 or
is evidence of fire, but taken by itself it will P60,000.00.
not prove the existence of fire. Unless Alteration in the use of the thing insured
accompanied by ignition, heat sufficient to made without the consent of the insurer
cause charring or scorching does not entitles the latter to rescind the contract
constitute fire. To constitute fire, of insurance.
combustion must proceed at a rate
sufficiently fast to produce a flame, a glow Requisites for rescission in case of
or incandescence. Regardless of the amount alteration
of heat, there can be no fire until ignition
takes place. 1. The use or condition of the thing is
specifically limited or stipulated in the
(Miravite, “The Insurance Code of the policy;
Philippines” citing D.L.Bickelhauf, p.478)
2. Such use or condition as limited by the
policy is altered;
Under section 75, the insurer is given This option must be exercised within a
the right to insert terms and conditions stipulated period or within a reasonable
in the policy which if violated would time.
avoid it. An alteration made in the use or
condition of the thing insured will thus
avoid a policy under the same section if CASUALTY INSURANCE
such alteration is expressly prohibited
altough it does not increase the risk. Section 174, Insurance Code
Rule on pledge, hypothecate or transfer fire Casualty Insurance includes all forms of
policy insurance against loss or liability arising
from accident or mishap which are not
As a rule, after a loss has occured, insured within the scope of other types of
may pledge, hypothecate or transfer a fire insurance, namely: marine, fire, surety, ship
insurance policy or rights thereunder. This and life.
he may even do so even without the
consent of or notice to the insurer. In such Example : Robbery and theft insurance,
case, it is not the personal contract which is accident insurance
being assigned, but a claim under or a right
Liability Insurance is a contract of
of action on the policy against the insurer.
indemnity for the benefit of the insured and
This rule however is subject to the those in privity with him, or those to whom
provisions of Section 173 of the Insurance the law upon the grounds of public policy
Code. extends the indemnity against liability
No policy of fire insurance shall be pledged, Section 174 defines casualty insurance
hyothecated, or transferred to any person, by process of elimination.
firm or company who acts as agent for or
otherwise represents the issuing company, Applies to almost any kind of insurance
and any such pledge, hypothecation, or
transfer hereacter made shall be void and of Includes therfore any loss or damage
no effect insofar as it may affect other when an accident is the cause of loss
creditors of the insured. (section 173,
Insurance Code) The terms 'accident' and 'accidental', as
used in insurance contracts have not
acquired any technical meaning and are
construed by the courts in their
ordinary and common acceptation.
Thus, the terms have been taken to
P a g e | 21
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
mean that which happen by chance or (a.) Insurance against specified perils which
fortuitously, without intention and may affect the person and/or property
design, and which is unexpected, of the insured
unusual, and unforeseen. An accident is (b.) Insurance against specified perils which
an event that takes place without one's may give rise to liability on the part of
foresight or expectation — an event that the insured for claims for injuries to
proceeds from an unknown cause or is others or damage to their property.
an unusual effect of a known cause and,
therefore, not expected." Insurable Interest in Casualty Insurance
[G.R. No. 100970. September 2, 1992.]
FINMAN GENERAL ASSURANCE The insurable interest is to be found in the
CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. THE interest of the insured has in the safety of the
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and person or property who may maintain, or in
JULIA SURPOSA, respondents. the freedom from damage of property which
may become the basis of suits against him in
There is no accident when a deliberate case of their injury or destruction.
act is performed unless some additional,
unexpected, independent, and The insurable interest does not depend upon
unforeseen happening occurs which whether the insured has a legal or equitable
produces or brings about the result of interest in property but upon whether he may
injury or death. In other words, where be charged at law with liability against which
the death or injury is not the natural or insurance is taken out.
probable result of the insured's
voluntary act, or if something Attaches when the liability of the insured
unforeseen occurs in the doing of the act attaches, regardless of actual loss at that
which produces the injury, the resulting time.
death is within the protection of the
policies insuring against death or injury The right of the person injured to sue the
from accident." [De la Cruz vs. Capital insurer of the party at fault (insured)
Insurance & Surety Co., Inc., 17 SCRA depends on whether the contract of
559 (1966)]. insurance is intended to benefit third
persons also or only the insured.
Two General Divisions of Casualty
Insurance Subject to two tests:
(a.) "Motor Vehicle" is any vehicle as defined The injured for whom the contract of
in section three, paragraph (a) of insurance is intended can sue directly the
Republic Act Numbered Four Thousand insurer. The general purpose of statutes
One Hundred Thirty-Six, otherwise known enabling an injured person to proceed
as the "Land Transportation and Traffic directly against the insurer is to protect
Code; injured persons against the insolvency
of the insured who causes such injury,
RA 4136, as amended, provides: and to give such injured person a certain
beneficial interest in the proceeds of the
SECTION 3. Words and phrases defined.
— As used in this Act: policy, and statutes are to be liberally
construed so that their intended
(b.) "Motor Vehicle" shall mean any vehicle purpose may be accomplished. It has
propelled by any power other than even been held that such a provision
muscular power using the public creates a contractual relation which inures
highways, but excepting road rollers, to the benefit of any and every person who
trolley cars, street-sweepers, sprinklers, may be negligently injured by the named
lawn mowers, bulldozers, graders, fork- insured as if such injured person were
lifts, amphibian trucks, and cranes if not specifically named in the policy. (S 449 7
used on public highways, vehicles which Am. Jur., 2d, pp. 118-119)
run only on rails or tracks, and tractors,
SECTION 374. It shall be unlawful for any
trailers and traction engines of all kinds
used exclusively for agricultural land transportation operator or owner of a
purposes. motor vehicle to operate the same in the
public highways unless there is in force in
(c.) Trailers having any number of wheels, relation thereto a policy of insurance or
when propelled or intended to be guarantee in cash or surety bond issued in
propelled by attachment to a motor accordance with the provisions of this
vehicle, shall be classified as separate chapter.
motor vehicle with no power rating.
SECTION 375. The Commissioner shall
(d.) "Third Party" is any person other than a furnish the Land Transportation
passenger as defined in this section and Commissioner with a list of insurance
shall also exclude a member of the companies authorized to issue the policy of
household, or a member of the family insurance or surety bond required by this
within the second degree of chapter.
consanguinity or affinity, of a motor
vehicle owner or land transportation
P a g e | 23
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
SECTION 376. The Land Transportation herself and minor ROY ROLAND, GLORIA
Commission shall not allow the registration KHO VDA. DE CALABIA for herself and
or renewal of registration of any motor minors MARY GRACE, WILLIE, JR.,
vehicle without first requiring from the land VOLTAIRE, GLENN, and MAY, all
transportation operator or motor vehicle surnamed CALABIA, DANIEL KHO,
owner concerned the presentation and filing JOSEFINA KHO, EMERITA KHO APEGO,
of a substantiating documentation in a form ANTONIO KHO and TERESITA KHO,
approved by the Commissioner evidencing respondents.
that the policy of insurance or guaranty in
cash or surety bond required by this chapter A Chevrolet truck, driven by Guillermo
is in effect. Corbeta and owned by the National Food
Authority (NFA), collided with a Toyota
[G.R. No. 60506. August 6, 1992.] Tamaraw owned and operated by Victor Uy.
FIGURACION VDA. DE MAGLANA, EDITHA The truck was insured with the GSIS against
M. CRUZ, ERLINDA M. MASESAR, liabilities for death and injuries to third
LEONILA M. MALLARI, GILDA ANTONIO persons with the maximum indemnity for
and the minors LEAH, LOPE, JR., and death of P12,000. Five passengers died and
ELVIRA, all surnamed MAGLANA, herein 10 others were injured in the accident. All
represented by their mother, were passengers of the Toyota Tamaraw.
FIGURACION VDA. DE MAGLANA, One of the three cases filed was for damages
petitioners, vs. HONORABLE FRANCISCO based on quasi-delict against GSIS, as insurer
Z. CONSOLACION, Presiding Judge of of the truck, NFA, the driver Corbeta, Uy and
Davao City, Branch II, and AFISCO the insurer, Mabuhay Insurance and
INSURANCE CORPORATION, Guaranty Co., MIGC the insurer of the Toyota
respondents. Tamaraw. Hospital charges and fees
ISSUE: WHEN DOES THE INSURER’S rendered to the victims were conclusively
established at the trial.
LIABILITY IN A COMPREHENSIVE MOTOR
VEHICLE LIABILITY INSURANCE ACCRUE?
Thereafter, judgment was rendered ordering
"[W]here an insurance policy insures directly MIGC, Corbeta, NFA and GSIS to pay jointly
against liability, the insurer's liability and severally private respondents, heirs and
accrues immediately upon the occurrence of victims of the collision, damages after a
the injury or event upon which the liability finding that the negligence of Corbeta was
depends and does not depend on the recovery the proximate cause of the collision. On
of judgment by the injured party against the appeal, the Court of Appeals rendered
insured. The underlying reason behind the judgment affirming in toto the assailed
third-party liability (TPL) of the Compulsory decision. Hence, this recourse by GSIS
Motor Vehicle Liability Insurance is "to challenging the adjudged solidary liability on
protect injured persons against the the ground that its liability under the
insolvency of the insured who causes such insurance contract is different from the
injury, and to give such injured person a liability of NFA arising from quasi-delict and
certain beneficial interest in the proceeds of the lack of cause of action for failure of
the policy..." (Shafer vs. Judge, RTC of respondents to file their insurance claim
Olongapo City, Br. 75, G.R. No. 78848, Nov. within six (6) months from date of accident.
14, 1988, 167 SCRA 386, 391)
EXTENT OF LIABILITY OF INSURER. —
[G.R. No. 101439. June 21, 1999.] However, although the victim may proceed
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE directly against the insurer for indemnity,
SYSTEM (GSIS), petitioner, vs. COURT OF the third-party liability is only up to the
APPEALS (former Tenth Division), extent of the insurance policy and those
VICTORIA JAIME VDA. DE KHO, for required by law.
P a g e | 24
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
INSURER NOT SOLIDARILY LIABLE WITH but deleted the appearance and attorney's
INSURED AND/OR OTHER PARTY AT FAULT. fees.
While it is true that where the insurance Whether the registered owner of a motor
contract provides for indemnity against vehicle may be held liable for damages
liability to third persons, and such third arising from a vehicular accident
persons can directly sue the insurer, the involving his motor vehicle which was
direct liability of the insurer under indemnity being operated by the employee of the
contracts against third party liability does vehicle's buyer without the latter's
not mean that the insurer can be held liable consent?
in solidum with the insured and/or the other
parties found at fault. For the liability of the We have consistently ruled that the
insurer is based on contract; that of the registered owner of any vehicle is directly
insured carrier or vehicle owner is based on and primarily responsible to the public
tort. The liability of GSIS based on the and third persons while it is being
insurance contract is direct, but not solidary operated. The rationale behind such
with that of the NFA. The latter's liability is doctrine was explained way back in 1957
based separately on Article 2180 of the Civil in Erezo vs. Jepte: The principle upon
Code. which this doctrine is based is that in
dealing with vehicles registered under
The requirement that notice of insurance the Public Service Law, the public has the
claims must be filed within six (6) months right to assume or presume that the
from date of accident may be waived. The registered owner is the actual owner
defense of laches or prescription in the case thereof, for it would be difficult for the
at bar was deem waived for failure of public to enforce the actions that they
petitioner to promptly interpose the defense may have for injuries caused to them by
of delay in filing the notice of insurance the vehicles being negligently operated if
claim. the public should be required to prove
who the actual owner is.
[G.R. No. 144274. September 20, 2004]
NOSTRADAMUS VILLANUEVA, petitioner, Whether the driver is authorized or not
vs. PRISCILLA R. DOMINGO and by the actual owner is irrelevant to
LEANDRO LUIS R. DOMINGO, determining the liability of the registered
respondents. owner who the law holds primarily and
directly responsible for any accident,
Petitioner Villanueva was a former owner injury or death caused by the operation
who remained to be the registered owner of of the vehicle in the streets and highways.
a car that got involved in a traffic mishap. To require the driver of the vehicle to be
The incident caused damage to the car authorized by the actual owner before
registered to Priscilla Domingo and driven by the registered owner can be held
Leandro Luis Domingo, both respondents accountable is to defeat the very purpose
herein. The driver of the vehicle registered in why motor vehicle legislations are
petitioner's name was found to be at fault. As enacted in the first place.
a result, a complaint was filed against
several persons including petitioner. After 'We believe that it is immaterial whether
trial, the trial court found the petitioner or not the driver was actually employed
liable and ordered him to pay the respondent by the operator of record. It is even not
actual, moral and exemplary damages plus necessary to prove who the actual owner
appearance and attorney's fees. The Court of of the vehicle and the employer of the
Appeals affirmed the trial court's decision driver is. Granting that, in this case, the
father of the driver is the actual owner
P a g e | 25
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
and that he is the actual employer, "THEFT" clause, and not the "AUTHORIZED
following the well-settled principle that DRIVER" clause, that should apply.
the operator of record continues to be the
operator of the vehicle in contemplation ". . . Theft is an entirely different legal
of law, as regards the public and third concept from that of accident. Theft is
person, and as such is responsible for the committed by a person with the intent to
consequences incident to its operation, gain or, to put it in another way, with the
we must hold and consider such owner- concurrence of the doer's will. On the other
operator of record as the employer, in hand, accident, although it may proceed or
contemplation of law, of the driver. And, result from negligence, is the happening of
to give effect to this policy of law as an event without the concurrence of the will
enunciated in the above cited decisions of of the person by whose agency it was caused.
this Court, we must now extend the same (Bouvier's Law Dictionary, Vol. I, 1914 ed., p.
and consider the actual operator and 101).
employer as the agent of the operator of
record.'
LIFE INSURANCE
As to legal basis No need for any legal basis There must be legal basis
As to time of Must exist only at the time of the Must exist at the time of
insurable interest perfection of the contract perfection and the time of loss.
Sec. 183. Unless the interest of a person 1. Unusual violence 1. Natural and
insured is susceptible of exact pecuniary inevitable action of
measurement, the measure of indemnity the sea;
under a policy of insurance upon life or
health is the sum fixed in the policy. 2. Extraordinary 2. Ordinary wear and
action of the wind tear of the ship
- Valued policy and wave
Over the vessel to the extent of its value, Section 110 of the Insurance Code
provided that if chartered, the recovery is 1. National Character of the Insured;
only up to the amount not recoverable 2. Liability of the thing insured to capture or
from the charterer
detention;
He also has insurable interest on the 3. Liability to seizure from breach of foreign
expected freightage (section 103) laws of trade
4. Want of necessary documents; and
No insurable interest if he will be 5. Use of false or simulated papers
compensated by charterer for the value of
the vessel, in case of loss.
P a g e | 29
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
- ship’s fitness to perform the service and When caused by circumstances outside the
to encounter the ordinary perils of the control of the ship captain or ship owner
voyage, contemplated by the parties to
the policy. When necessary to comply with a warranty
or to avoid a peril (REAL PERIL)
General Rule on Seaworthiness
When made in good faith to avoid a peril
The warranty of seaworthiness is complied with (NON-EXISTING/ASSUMED PERIL)
if the ship be seaworthy at the time of the
When made in good faith to save human life
commencement of the risk. Prior or subsequent
unseaworthiness is not a breach of the warranty or to relieve another vessel in distress
nor is it material that the vessel arrives in safety (section 124)
at the end of her voyage. Effect - In case of loss, the insurer is
Ex ceptions to the General Rule on liable.
seaworthiness : Improper Deviation
1. In case of Time Policy , the ship must be Every deviation not specified in Section 124
seaworthy at the commencement of every
voyage she may undertake during the Effect – In case of loss or damage subsequent
period of the coverage; to an improper deviation, the insurer is not
liable. (section 124)
2. In the case of Cargo Policy, each vessel
upon which the cargo is shipped or Loss
transhipped must be seaworthy at the
commencement of each particular Rules in case of Loss
voyage; A. Total
3. In the case of Voyage Policy, 1. Actual
contemplating a voyage at different
stages, the ship must be seaworthy at the 1.1. Total Destruction;
commencement of each stage of the
voyage 1.2. Irretrievable loss by sinking or being
broken up;
Deviation
1.3. Damage rendering the thing valueless to
Departure from the course of the voyage the owner for the purpose for which he
insured, or an unreasonable delay in held it; or
pursuing the voyage or, the
commencement of an entirely diffrerent 1.4. Other event which effectively deprives
voyage. (section 123) the owner of the possession, at the port
of destination, of the thing insured.
Instances of Deviation
2. Constructive
1.Deviation from the agreed voyage;
2.1. Actual loss of more than ¾ of the value
2. Departure of vessel from the course of of the object;
the sailing fixed by mercantile usage;
P a g e | 31
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
2.2. Damage reducing, by more than ¾ of the PSE vs. Court of Appeal, 281 SCRA 232
value of the vessel and of the cargo; and
Key Features
2.3. Expense of the transshipment exceeds ¾
of the value of the cargo. 1. Requires the sale or offer for sale of any
security in the Philippines to be
B. Partial – that which is not total (section 128) registered and permitted by SEC, unless
such securities are exempt securities or
sold in exempt transactions;
IN CASE OF CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS, 2. Requires registration of those who
INSURED’s REMEDIES ARE : participate in the offer and sale of
1. Abandon the goods or vessel to the insurer securities, like brokers, dealers and
and claim for whole insured value; (section salesmen and securities exchanges;
139) 3. Provides requirements to ensure that
2. Without abandoning the vessel, claim for transactions involving securities would be
partial actual loss (section 155) pursued on sound, fair and equitable
principles and to prevent market
Abadonment - Act of the insured by which, manipulation;
after a constructive total loss, he declared the
relinquishment to the insurer of his interest 4. Expanded SEC powers and functions,
including the power to promulgate rules
in the thing insured. (section 138)
and regulations and to exercise
investigatory powers and removed its
quasi-judicial powers under PD 902-A.
REVISED SECURITIES ACT (RA 8799)
Section 3.1
Referred to as the “Blue Sky Law”
Securities" are shares, participation or
State Policies (Section 2) interests in a corporation or in a
commercial enterprise or profit-making
- Establish a socially conscious free market
venture and evidenced by a certificate,
that regulates itself;
contract, instruments, whether written or
- Encourage widest participation of electronic in character. It includes:
ownership in enterprises and enhance
(a.) Shares of stocks, bonds, debentures,
democratization of wealth;
notes evidences of indebtedness,
- Promote development of the capital asset-backed securities;
market;
(b.) Investment contracts, certificates of
- Protect investors and ensure full and fair interest or participation in a profit
disclosure about securities; and sharing agreement, certifies of deposit
for a future subscription;
- Minimize if not totally eliminate insider
trading and other fraudulent or (c.) Fractional undivided interests in oil, gas
manipulative devices and practices which or other mineral rights;
create distortions in the free market.
(d.) Derivatives like option and warrants;
Intended Effects
(e.) Certificates of assignments, certificates of
1. Prevention of excesses and fraudulent participation, trust certificates, voting
transactions, merely by requirement that trust certificates or similar instruments
their details be revealed
(f.) Proprietary or nonproprietary
2. Placing the market during the early stages Membership certificates in corporations;
of offering of a security a body of and
information, which operating indirectly
(g.) Other instruments as may in the future be
through investment services and expert
determined by the Commission.
investors, will tend to produce a more
accurate appraisal of a security
P a g e | 32
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Commission shall retain jurisdiction over Eustacio Atwel, et al. vs. Concepcion
pending suspension of Progressive Ass'n., Inc., (G.R. No.
payment/rehabilitation cases filed as of 169370, April 14, 2008)
30 June 2000 until finally disposed.
From the above, it can be said that the SEC's
Juxtaposing the jurisdiction of the RTC regulatory authority over private
under RA 8799 and the powers that were corporations encompasses a wide margin of
retained by the SEC, it is clear that the areas, touching nearly all of a corporation's
SEC retained its administrative, concerns. This authority more vividly
regulatory, and oversight powers over all springs from the fact that a corporation owes
corporations, partnerships, and its existence to the concession of its
associations who are grantees of primary corporate franchise from the state. Under its
franchises, and/or a license or permit regulatory responsibilities, the SEC may pass
issued by the Government. However, the upon applications for, or may suspend or
Securities Regulations Code (SRC) is clear revoke (after due notice and hearing),
that when there is a controversy arising certificates of registration of corporations,
out of intra-corporate relations, between partnerships and associations (excluding
and among stockholders, members or cooperatives, homeowners' association, and
associates, and between, any, or all of labor unions); compel legal and regulatory
them and the corporation, it is the RTC, compliances; conduct inspections; and
not SEC, which has jurisdiction over the impose fines or other penalties for violations
case. of the Revised Securities Act, as well as
implementing rules and directives of the SEC,
Florencio Orendain vs. BF Homes, Inc., such as may be warranted.
(G.R. No. 146313, October 31, 2006)
Leslie Okol vs. Slimmers World Such register and all documents or
International, et al., (G.R. No. 160146, information with the respect to the securities
December 11, 2009) registered therein shall be open to public
inspection at reasonable hours on business
A criminal charge for violation of the days.
Securities Regulation Code is a specialized
dispute. Hence, it must first be referred to an Section 8.5. The Commission may audit the
administrative agency of special competence, financial statements, assets and other
i.e., the SEC. Under the doctrine of primary information of firm applying for registration
jurisdiction, courts will not determine a of its securities whenever it deems the same
controversy involving a question within the necessary to insure full disclosure or to
jurisdiction of the administrative tribunal, protect the interest of the investors and the
where the question demands the exercise of public in general.
sound administrative discretion requiring the Exceptions:
specialized knowledge and expertise of said
administrative tribunal to determine The following securities may be sold
technical and intricate matters of fact. The without need of registration.
Securities Regulation Code is a special law. Its
enforcement is particularly vested in the SEC. (a.) Any security issued or guaranteed by the
Hence, all complaints for any violation of the Government of the Philippines, or by any
Code and its implementing rules and political subdivision or agency thereof, or
regulations should be filed with the SEC. by any person controlled or supervised
Where the complaint is criminal in nature, by, and acting as an instrumentality of
the SEC shall indorse the complaint to the said Government.
DOJ for preliminary investigation and
(b.) Any security issued or guaranteed by the
prosecution as provided in Section 53.1
government of any country with which
earlier quoted.
the Philippines maintains diplomatic
relations, or by any state, province or
Manuel V. Baviera vs. Esperanza
political subdivision thereof on the basis
Paglinawan, et al., (G.R. Nos. 168380 &
of reciprocity: Provided, That the
170602, February 8, 2007)
Commission may require compliance with
SEC’s power on Securities Transactions the form and content for disclosures the
Commission may prescribe.
Section 8.1 Securities shall not be sold or
offered for sale or distribution within the (c.) An isolated transaction in which any
Philippines, without a registration statement security is sold, offered for sale,
duly filed with and approved by the subscription or delivery by the owner
Commission. Prior to such sale, information therefore, or by his representative for the
on the securities, in such form and with such owner’s account, such sale or offer for
substance as the Commission may prescribe, sale or offer for sale, subscription or
shall be made available to each prospective delivery not being made in the course of
purchaser. repeated and successive transaction of a
like character by such owner, or on his
Section 8.2. The Commission may account by such representative and such
conditionally approve the registration owner or representative not being the
statement under such terms as it may deem underwriter of such security.\
necessary.
(d.) The distribution by a corporation actively
Section 8.3. The Commission may specify the engaged in the business authorized by its
terms and conditions under which any articles of incorporation, of securities to
written communication, including any its stockholders or other security holders
summary prospectus, shall be deemed not to as a stock dividend or other distribution
constitute an offer for sale under this Section. out of surplus.
Section 8.4. A record of the registration of (e.) The sale of capital stock of a corporation
securities shall be kept in Register Securities to its own stockholders exclusively,
in which shall be recorded orders entered by where no commission or other
the Commission with respect such securities. remuneration is paid or given directly or
P a g e | 35
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
indirectly in connection with the sale of (k.) The sale of securities by an issuer to
such capital stock. fewer than twenty (20) persons in the
Philippines during any twelve-month
(f.) The issuance of bonds or notes secured period.
by mortgage upon real estate or tangible
personal property, when the entire (l.) The sale of securities to any number of
mortgage together with all the bonds or the following qualified buyers:
notes secured thereby are sold to a single
purchaser at a single sale a. Bank;
b. Registered investment house;
(g.) The issue and delivery of any security in c. Insurance company;
exchange for any other security of the d. Pension fund or retirement plan
same issuer pursuant to a right of maintained by the Government of the
conversion entitling the holder of the Philippines or any political
security surrendered in exchange to make subdivision thereof or manage by a
such conversion: Provided, That the bank or other persons authorized by
security so surrendered has been the Bangko Sentral to engage in trust
registered under this Code or was, when functions;
sold, exempt from the provision of this e. Investment company or;
Code, and that the security issued and f. Such other person as the Commission
delivered in exchange, if sold at the may rule by determine as qualified
conversion price, would at the time of buyers, on the basis of such factors as
such conversion fall within the class of financial sophistication, net worth,
securities entitled to registration under knowledge, and experience in
this Code. Upon such conversion the par financial and business matters, or
value of the security surrendered in such amount of assets under management.
exchange shall be deemed the price at
which the securities issued and delivered Section 10.3. Any person applying for an
in such exchange are sold. exemption under this Section, shall file with
the Commission a notice identifying the
(h.) Broker’s transaction, executed upon exemption relied upon on such form and at
customer’s orders, on any registered such time as the Commission by the rule may
Exchange or other trading market. prescribe and with such notice shall pay to
the Commission fee equivalent to one-tenth
(i.) Subscriptions for shares of the capitals
(1/10) of one percent (1%) of the maximum
stocks of a corporation prior to the
value aggregate price or issued value of the
incorporation thereof or in pursuance of
an increase in its authorized capital securities.
stocks under the Corporation Code, when Section 12.1. All securities required to be
no expense is incurred, or no commission, registered under Subsection 8. I shall be
compensation or remuneration is paid or registered through the filing by the issuer in
given in connection with the sale or the main office of the Commission, of a sworn
disposition of such securities, and only registration statement with the respect to
when the purpose for soliciting, giving or such securities, in such form and containing
taking of such subscription is to comply such information and document as the
with the requirements of such law as to Commission prescribe. The registration
the percentage of the capital stock of a statement shall include any prospectus
corporation which should be subscribed required or permitted to be delivered under
before it can be registered and duly Subsections 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4.
incorporated, or its authorized, capital
increase. Section 13.1. The Commission may reject a
registration statement and refuse
(j.) The exchange of securities by the issuer registration of the security there-under, or
with the existing security holders revoke the affectivity of a registration
exclusively, where no commission or statement and the registration of the security
other remuneration is paid or given there-under after the due notice and hearing
directly or indirectly for soliciting such by issuing an order to such effect, setting
exchange. forth its finding in respect thereto, if it finds
that:
P a g e | 36
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
circumstances under which they are made, Transactions and access to assets are
not mis-leading, or to engaged to any pursuant to management authorization; (b)
fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative acts or Financial statements are provided in
practices, in connection with any tender offer conformity with generally accepted
or request or invitation for tenders, or any accounting principles that are adopted by
solicitation for any security holders in the Accounting standards council and the
opposition to or in favor of any such favor of rules promulgated by the Commission with
any such offer, request, or invitation. The the regard to the preparation of the financial
Commission shall, for the purposes of this statements; and (c) Recorded assets are
subsection, define and prescribe means compared with existing assets at reasonable
reasonably designed to prevent, such acts intervals and differences are reconciled.
and practices as are fraudulent, deceptive
and manipulative. Manipulative Practices and Insider Trading
Pump and dump is a form of stock fraud in Section 24.2. No person shall use or employ,
which people artificially inflate the price of in connection with the purchase or sale of
stock in order to profit. any security any manipulative or deceptive
device or contrivance. Neither shall any short
Hype and Dump sale be effected nor any stop-loss order be
executed in connection with the purchase or
Also known as “Pump and Dump”
sale of any security except in accordance with
Pump and dump is a form of stock fraud in such rules and regulations as the Commission
which people artificially inflate the price of may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in
stock in order to profit. the public interest for the protection of
investors.
Improper Matched Orders
Regulation of Option Trading
Engaging in transactions where both the buy
and sell orders are entered at the same time
Section 25. Regulation of Option Trading. – No
with the same price and quantity by different
member of an Exchange shall, directly or
but colluding parties.
indirectly endorse or guarantee the
Boiler Room Operations performance of any put, call, straddle, option
or privilege in relation to any security
refers to the use of high pressure sales tactics registered on a securities exchange. The
to sell stocks to clients who are "cold called", terms "put", "call", "straddle", "option", or
or called randomly, most likely after being "privilege" shall not include any registered
picked out of a phone directory. warrant, right or convertible security.
Boiler rooms are often set up in inexpensive Option Trading is a contract that gives the
office spaces, where armies of telemarketers buyer the right, but not the obligation, to buy
make these cold calls. While the stock they or sell an underlying asset at a specific price
sell may be real (most likely an unknown on or before a certain date.
micro-cap stock), the information these
salespeople use to hype their product could The danger of damage to the public consists
be false or misleading because of their of the fact that a person to whom an option
overwhelming desire to sell the stock and has been given can abuse the same and
claim commissions. control a large number of shares for a certain
period of time and thus, manipulate the
Scalping market.
"Scalping refers to recommending that others
purchase a security while secretly selling the
same security in the market."
Daisy Chain
57.1 (b) more than five (5) years after the complaints for any violation of the Code and its
sale. implementing rules and regulations should be
filed with the SEC. Where the complaint is
62.2. No action shall be maintained to
criminal in nature, the SEC shall indorse the
enforce any liability created under any
other provision of this Code unless complaint to the DOJ for preliminary
brought within two (2) years after the investigation and prosecution.
discovery of the facts constituting the
cause of action and within five (5) years What is the Howey Test?
after such cause of action accrued.
The Howey Test is applied to determine whether
SEC. 63. Amount of Damages to be
Awarded. - 63.1. All suits to recover an investment contract shall be required as a
damages pursuant to Sections 56, 57, 58, security to be registered under the Securities
59, 60 and 61 shall be brought before the Regulation Code. The Securities Regulation Code
Regional Trial Court, which shall have treats investment contracts as securities that
exclusive jurisdiction to hear and decide have to be registered with the SEC before they
such suits. The Court is hereby authorized can be distributed and sold. An investment
to award damages in an amount not
contract is a contract, transaction, or scheme
exceeding triple the amount of the
transaction plus actual damages. where a person invests his money in a common
enterprise and is led to expect profits primarily
Exemplary damages may also be awarded from the efforts of others.
in cases of bad faith, fraud, malevolence or
wantonness in the violation of this Code The United States Supreme Court held
or the rules and regulations promulgated in Securities and Exchange Commission v. W.J.
thereunder. Howey Co.that, for an investment contract to
exist, the following elements, referred to as
The Court is also authorized to award the Howey test must concur: (1) a contract,
attorney’s fees not exceeding thirty
percentum (30%) of the award. transaction, or scheme; (2) an investment of
money; (3) investment is made in a common
enterprise; (4) expectation of profits; and (5)
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES ON SECURITIES profits arising primarily from the efforts of
REGULATION CODE others
SEC vs. Prosperity (2012) in relation to The Supreme Court recognized there were two
Howey and Turner Test to determine tests in determining whether a contract was an
whether an investment contract is a investment contract.
“security”.
The first is the Howey test, which traces
SEC Prosperity.Com, Inc. (PCI) sold computer its roots to the SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. (328
software and hosted websites without providing US 293 [1946]) case in the United States.
internet service. To make a profit, PCI devised a The decision held that a contract,
scheme in which, for the price of US$234.00 transaction or scheme is an investment
(subsequently increased to US$294), a buyer contract where a person (a) invests his
could acquire from it an internet website of a 15- money (b) in a common enterprise (c)
Mega Byte (MB) capacity. At the same time, by with an expectation of profits (d) solely
referring to PCI his own down-line buyers, a from the efforts of others.
first-time buyer could earn commissions,
The other test is the Turner test based on
interest in real estate in the Philippines and in
a later case at the Court of Appeals—SEC
the United States, and insurance coverage
vs. Turner (474 F.2d 476, 9th Cir. 1973)—
worth P50,000.00.
which basically has the same elements as
To benefit from this scheme, a PCI buyer must the Howey test except that the profit was
enlist and sponsor at least two other buyers as described “primarily” from the efforts of
his own down-lines. These second tier of buyers others.
could in turn build up their own down-lines. For
What is Tender Offer?
each pair of down-lines, the buyer-sponsor
received a US$92.00 commission. But referrals in A tender offer is an offer by the acquiring person
a day by the buyer-sponsor should not exceed 16 to stockholders of a public company for them to
since the commissions due from excess referrals tender their shares; it gives the minority
inure to PCI, not to the buyer-sponsor. shareholders the chance to exit the company
under reasonable terms, giving them the
PCI appears to be engaged in network marketing,
opportunity to sell their shares at the same price
a scheme adopted by companies for getting
as those of the majority shareholders. The
people to buy their products outside the usual
mandatory tender offer is still applicable even if
retail system where products are bought from
the acquisition, direct or indirect, is less than
the stores shelf. Under this scheme, adopted by
35% when the purchase would result in
most health product distributors, the buyer can
ownership of over 51% of the total outstanding
become a down-line seller. The latter earns
equity securities of the public company.
commissions from purchases made by new
buyers whom he refers to the person who sold
the product to him. The network goes down the LAW ON MORTGAGE
line where the orders to buy come.
Real Mortgage
The commissions, interest in real estate, and
Chattel Mortgage
insurance coverage worth P50,000.00 are
incentives to down-line sellers to bring in other Real Mortgage - It is a contract whereby the
customers. These can hardly be regarded as debtor secures to the creditor the fulfillment
profits from investment of money under of a principal obligation, specially subjecting
the Howey test. to such security immovable property or real
rights over immovable property in case the
principal obligation is not complied with at
the time stipulated.
1. Immovables
P a g e | 42
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
foreigners can invest as much as one hundred by citizens of the Philippines, in order that
percent (100%) equity except in areas the corporation shall be considered a
included in the negative list. Foreign Philippine national."
owned firms catering mainly to the domestic
market shall be encouraged to undertake SEC. 4. Scope. – This Act shall not apply to
measures that will gradually increase Filipino banking and other financial institutions
participation in their businesses by which are governed and regulated by the
taking in Filipino partners, electing Filipinos General Banking Act and other laws under
to the board of directors, implementing the supervision of the Central Bank.
transfer of technology to Filipinos, generating
more employment for the economy and Sec. 7. Foreign Investments in Domestic
enhancing skills of Filipino workers. Market Enterprises. - Non-Philippine
nationals may own up to one hundred
“Investment” shall mean equity participation percent (100%) of domestic market
in any enterprise organized or existing under enterprises unless foreign ownership therein
the laws of the Philippines. is prohibited or limited by the Constitution
and existing law or the Foreign Investment
“Foreign investment” shall mean an equity Negative List under Section 8 hereof."
investment made by a non-Philippine
national in the form of foreign exchange SEC.9. Investment Rights of Former
and/or other assets actually transferred to Natural-born Filipinos. - For purposes of
the Philippines and duly registered with the this Act, former natural born citizens of the
Central Bank which shall assess and appraise Philippines shall have the same investment
the value of such assets other than foreign rights of Philippine citizen in Cooperatives
exchange. under Republic Act No. 6938, Rural Banks
under Republic Act No. 7353, Thrift Banks
Foreign Investments Negative List” or and Private Development Banks under
“Negative List” shall mean a list of areas of Republic Act No. 7906, and Financing
economic activity whose foreign ownership is Companies under Republic Act No. 5980.
limited to a maximum of forty percent (40%) These rights shall not extend to activities
of the equity capital of the enterprises reserved by the Constitution including (1) the
engaged therein. exercise of profession; (2) in defense-related
activities under Section 8 (b) hereof, unless
“Philippine national” shall mean a citizen of specifically authorized by the Secretary of
the Philippines, or a domestic partnership or National Defense; and (3) activities covered
association wholly owned by citizens of the by Republic Act No. 1180 (Retail Trade Act),
Philippines; or a corporation organized Republic Act No. 5487 (Security Agency Act),
under the laws of the Philippines of which at Republic Act No. 7076 (Small Scale Mining
least sixty percent (60%) of the capital stock Act), Republic Act No. 3018, as amended
outstanding and entitled to vote is owned (Rice and Corn Industry Act), and P.D. 449
and held by citizens of the Philippines; or a (Cockpits Operation and Management)".
corporation organized abroad and registered
as doing business in the Philippines under SEC. 10. Other Rights of natural Born
the Corporation Code of which one hundred Citizen Pursuant to the Provisions of
percent (100%) of the capital stock Article XII, Section 8 of the Constitution. -
outstanding and entitled to vote is wholly Any natural born citizen who has lost his
owned by Filipinos or a trustee of funds for Philippine citizenship and who has the legal
pension or other employee retirement or capacity to enter into a contract under
separation benefits, where the trustee is a Philippine Laws may be a transferee of a
Philippine national and at least sixty percent private land up to maximum area of five
(60%) of the fund will accrue to the benefit of thousand (5,000) square meters in the case
Philippine nationals: Provided, That where a of urban land or three (3) hectares in the case
corporation and its non-Filipino stockholders of rural land to be used by him for business
own stocks in a Securities and Exchange or other purposes. In the case of married
Commission (SEC) registered enterprise, at couples, one of them may avail of the
least sixty percent of the capital stock privilege herein granted: Provided, That If
outstanding and entitled to vote of each of both shall avail of the same, the total is
both corporations must be owned and held
P a g e | 45
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
acquired shall not exceed the maximum paid-up capital shall be lowered to
herein fixed US$100,000 only to non-Philippine nationals
In case the transferee already owns urban or Basic Rights of Foreign Investors
rural land for business or other purposes, he
shall be entitled to be a transferee of Right to REPATRIATION OF INVESTMENTS
additional urban or rural land for business or
other purposes which when added to those In the case of foreign investments, the right
already owned by him shall not exceed the to repatriate the entire proceeds of the
maximum areas herein authorized. liquidation of the investments in the currency
in which the investment was originally made
A transferee under this Act may acquire not at the exchange rate prevailing at the time of
more than two (2) lots which should be repatriation.
situated in different municipalities or cities
anywhere in the Philippines: Provided, That Right to REMITTANCE OF EARNINGS
the Total land area thereof shall not exceed
five thousand (5,000) square meters in the The right to remit, at the exchange rate
case of urban land or three (3) hectares in the prevailing at the time of remittance, such as
case of rural land for use by him for business may be necessary to meet the payment of
or other purposes. A transferee who has interest and the principal on foreign loans
already acquired urban land shall be and foreign obligations arising from
disqualified form acquiring rural land and technological assistance contracts.
vice versa.
Right to FREEDOM FROM EXPROPRIATION
Small and medium-sized domestic market
enterprises with paid in equity capital less There shall be no expropriation by the
than the equivalent of Two hundred government of the property represented by
thousands US dollars (US$200,000.00), are the investments or of the property of
reserved to Philippines nationals: Provided, enterprises except for public use or in the
That if (1) they involve advance technology interest of national welfare and defense and
as determined by the Department of Science upon payment of just compensation. In such
and Technology, or (2) they employ at least cases, foreign investors or enterprises shall
fifty (50) direct employees, then a minimum have the right to remit sums received as
paid-in capital of One hundred thousand US compensation for the expropriated property
dollars (US$100,000.00) shall be allowed to in the currency in which the investment was
non-Philippines nationals. originally made and at the exchange rate
prevailing at the time of remittance.
Negative List “A”
Mass Media except recording, practice of GENERAL BANKING ACT AND OTHER
licensed profession, retail trade, cooperative
RELATED LAWS
and small-scale mining, etc. where foreign
ownership is prohibited; Advertising,
The banking system has become an indispensable
ownership of land, operation and
institution in the modern world and plays a vital
management of public utilities, etc., where
role in the economic life of every civilized society.
only minority foreign ownership is
Whether as mere passive entities for the safe-
prohibited
keeping and saving of money or as active
instruments of business and commerce, banks
Negative List “B”
have attained an ubiquitous presence among the
people, who have come to regard them with
Refers to areas that are defense-related,
respect and even gratitude and, above all, trust
those with adverse effects on public health
and confidence. In this connection, it is important
and morals and domestic market enterprises
that banks should guard against injury
with paid-up capital of less than US$200,000,
attributable to negligence or bad faith on its part.
provided they involved advanced technology
As repeatedly emphasized, since the banking
as determined by the Department of Science
business is impressed with public interest, the
and Technology (DOST) or directly employ at
least fifty (50) employees, in which case, the
P a g e | 46
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
trust and confidence of the public in it is of Liability of Banks for Acts of Officers and
paramount importance. Employees
SECTION 4. Supervisory Powers. — The The Bangko Sentral shall also have
operations and activities of banks shall be supervision over the operations of and
subject to supervision of the Bangko Sentral. exercise regulatory powers over quasi-
"Supervision" shall include the following: banks, trust entities and other financial
institutions which under special laws are
4.5. The issuance of rules of conduct or the subject to Bangko Sentral supervision.
establishment of standards of operation
for uniform application to all institutions For the purposes of this Act, "quasi-banks"
or functions covered, taking into shall refer to entities engaged in the
consideration the distinctive character of borrowing of funds through the issuance,
the operations of institutions and the endorsement or assignment with recourse or
substantive similarities of specific acceptance of deposit substitutes as defined
functions to which such rules, modes or in Section 95 of Republic Act No. 7653
standards are to be applied; (hereafter the "New Central Bank Act”) for
4.6. The conduct of examination to purposes of relending or purchasing of
determine compliance with laws and receivables and other obligations.
regulations if the circumstances so
warrant as determined by the Monetary • The Monetary Board may forbid a bank from
Board; doing business and place it under
4.7. Overseeing to ascertain that laws and receivership without prior notice and hearing
regulations are complied with; it the MB finds that a bank: (a) is unable to
4.8. Regular investigation which shall not be pay its liabilities as they become due in the
oftener than once a year from the last ordinary course of business; (b) has
date of examination to determine insufficient realizable assets to meet
whether an institution is conducting its liabilities; (c) cannot continue in business
business on a safe or sound basis: without involving probable losses to its
Provided, That the depositors and creditors; and (d) has
deficiencies/irregularities found by or willfully violated a cease and desist order of
discovered by an audit shall be the Monetary Board for acts or transactions
immediately addressed which are considered unsafe and unsound
4.9. Inquiring into the solvency and liquidity banking practices and other acts or
of the institution; or transactions constituting fraud or dissipation
P a g e | 48
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
of the assets of the institution. (Alfeo D. Bangko Sentral shall be liabilities of the
Vivas, vs. Monetary Board and PDIC, G.R. Bangko Sentral and may be issued only
No. 191424, August 7, 2013) against, and in amounts not exceeding, the
assets of the Bangko Sentral. Said notes
and coins shall be a first and paramount lien
Policy Directions; Ratios, Ceilings and on all assets of the Bangko Sentral.
Limitations The Bangko Sentral's holdings of its own
notes and coins shall not be considered as
SECTION 5. Policy Direction; Ratios, Ceilings part of its currency issue and, accordingly,
and Limitations. — The Bangko Sentral shall shall not form part of the assets or liabilities
provide policy direction in the areas of of the Bangko Sentral.
money, banking and credit.
Checks as Legal Tender
The Monetary Board may prescribe ratios,
ceilings, limitations, or other forms of Section 60. Legal Character. – Checks
regulation on the different types of accounts representing demand deposits do not
and practices of banks and quasi-banks have legal tender power and their
which shall, to the extent feasible, conform to acceptance in the payment of debts, both
internationally accepted standards, including public and private, is at the option of the
those of the Bank for International creditor: Provided, however, That a check
Settlements (BIS). The Monetary Board may which has been cleared and credited to the
exempt particular categories of transactions account of the creditor shall be equivalent to
from such ratios, ceilings and limitations, but a delivey to the creditor of cash in an amount
not limited to exceptional cases or to enable a equal to the amount credited to his account.
bank or quasi-bank under rehabilitation or
during a merger or consolidation to continue Monetary Stabilization
in business with safety to its creditors,
depositors and the general public SECTION 61. Guiding Principle. — The
Monetary Board shall endeavor to control any
The BSP has the exclusive power and expansion or contraction in monetary aggregates
authority to issue the national currency. which is prejudicial to the attainment or
BSP’s notes and coins are issued against, and maintenance of price stability
in amounts not exceeding, the assets of the
BSP. All notes and coins issued by the BSP are The policy may mean two things:
fully guaranteed by the government and are
considered legal tender for all private and 1. Increasing money supply during
public debts. recession to stimulate spending; or
2. Restricting it during inflation to curtail
spending.
Who bears liability for banks and notes
issued?
Classification of Banks
Cooperative Banks
Family Groups or related interests (sections bank directors or officers and disqualify those
12 and 13, GBL) unfit.
While the Court recognizes the right of the parties Restrictions on Bank Exposure to Directors,
to enter into contracts and who are expected to Officers, Stockholders and their Related
comply with their terms and obligations, this rule Interests (DOSRI)
is not absolute. Stipulated interest rates are illegal
if they are unconscionable and the Court is SECTION 36. Restriction on Bank
allowed to temper interest rates when necessary. Exposure to Directors, Officers, Stockholders
In exercising this vested power to determine what and Their Related Interests. — No director or
is iniquitous and unconscionable, the Court must officer of any bank shall, directly or
consider the circumstances of each case. What indirectly, for himself or as the
may be iniquitous and unconscionable in one case, representative or agent of others, borrow
may be just in another. In a number of cases, this from such bank nor shall he become a
Court equitably reduced the interest rate agreed guarantor, indorser or surety for loans from
upon by the parties for being iniquitous, such bank to others, or in any manner be an
unconscionable, and/or exorbitant. obligor or incur any contractual liability to
the bank except with the written approval of
TRADE & INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT the majority of all the directors of the bank,
CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES (Formerly excluding the director concerned: Provided,
Philippine Export & Foreign Loan Guarantee That such written approval shall not be
Corporation, petitioner, vs. ROBLETT required for loans, other credit
INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, accommodations and advances granted to
ROBERTO G. ABIERA and LETICIA ABIERA, and officers under a fringe benefit plan approved
PARAMOUNT INSURANCE CORPORATION, by the Bangko Sentral. The required approval
respondents. (G.R. No. 139290. May 19, 2006.) shall be entered upon the records of the bank
and a copy of such entry shall be transmitted
Escalation clauses are not void per se. However, forthwith to the appropriate supervising and
one "which grants the creditor an unbridled examining department of the Bangko Sentral.
right to adjust the interest independently and
upwardly, completely depriving the debtor of the Dealings of a bank with any of its directors,
right to assent to an important modification in officers or stockholders and their related
the agreement" is void. Clauses of that nature interests shall be upon terms not less
violate the principle of mutuality of contracts. favorable to the bank than those offered to
Article 1308 of the Civil Code holds that a others.
contract must bind both contracting parties; its
validity or compliance cannot be left to the will After due notice to the board of directors of
of one of them. the bank, the office of any bank director or
officer who violates the provisions of this
For this reason, we have consistently held that a Section may be declared vacant and the
valid escalation clause provides: director or officer shall be subject to the
penal provisions of the New Central Bank Act.
1. That the rate of interest will only be
increased if the applicable maximum rate of The Monetary Board may regulate the
interest is increased by law or by the amount of loans, credit accommodations and
Monetary Board; and guarantees that may be extended, directly or
indirectly, by a bank to its directors, officers,
2. That the stipulated rate of interest will be stockholders and their related interests, as
reduced if the applicable maximum rate of well as investments of such bank in
interest is reduced by law or by the Monetary enterprises owned or controlled by said
Board (de-escalation clause). directors, officers, stockholders and their
related interests. However, the outstanding
EQUITABLE PCI BANK, AIMEE YU and BEJAN loans, credit accommodations and guarantees
LIONEL APAS, petitioners, vs. NG SHEUNG which a bank may extend to each of its
NGOR ** doing business under the name and stockholders, directors, or officers and their
style "KEN MARKETING," KEN APPLIANCE related interests, shall be limited to an
DIVISION, INC. and BENJAMIN E. GO, amount equivalent to their respective
respondents. (G.R. No. 171545. December 19, unencumbered deposits and book value of
2007.) their paid-in capital contribution in the bank:
Provided, however, That loans, credit
accommodations and guarantees secured by
P a g e | 54
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
assets considered as non-risk by the Hence, the conservator merely takes the place of
Monetary Board shall be excluded from such a bank's board of directors. What the said
limit: Provided, further, That loans, credit board cannot do — such as repudiating a
accommodations and advances to officers in contract validly entered into under the
the form of fringe benefits granted in doctrine of implied authority — the
accordance with rules as may be prescribed conservator cannot do either. Ineluctably, his
by the Monetary Board shall not be subject to power is not unilateral and he cannot simply
the individual limit. repudiate valid obligations of the Bank. His
authority would be only to bring court actions to
Banks were not created for the benefit of assail such contracts — as he has already done
their directors and officers; they cannot use so in the instant case. A contrary understanding
the assets of the bank for their own benefit, of the law would simply not be permitted by the
except as may be permitted by law. Congress Constitution. Neither by common sense. To rule
has thus deemed it essential to impose otherwise would be to enable a failing bank to
restrictions on borrowings by bank directors become solvent, at the expense of third parties,
and officers in order to protect the public, by simply getting the conservator to unilaterally
especially the depositors. Hence, when the revoke all previous dealings which had one way
law prohibits directors and officers of or another come to be considered unfavorable to
banking institutions from becoming in any the Bank, yielding nothing to perfected
manner an obligor of the bank (unless with contractual rights nor vested interests of the
the approval of the board), the terms of the third parties who had dealt with the Bank.
prohibition shall be the standards to be
applied to directors' transactions such as
those involved in the present case.
JOSE C. GO, petitioner, vs. BANGKO WHEN BANK IS UNDER RECEIVERSHIP /
SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS, respondent. (G.R. LIQUIDATION
No. 178429. October 23, 2009.)
The receiver or liquidator meanwhile acts
Prohibited Transactions of Banks not only for the benefit of the bank, but for its
creditors as well.
1. Prohibited to act as insurer
2. Conducting business in an unsafe or unsound In Provident Savings Bank vs. Court of
manner Appeals, we further stated that: When a bank
3. Prohibition on Dividend Declaration is prohibited from continuing to do business
4. Unauthorized advertisement or business by the Central Bank and a receiver is
representation appointed for such bank, that bank would not
be able to do new business, i.e., to grant new
Prohibited acts of borrower loans or to accept new deposits. However, the
receiver of the bank is in fact obliged to
Fraudulently over valuing any property for collect debts owing to the bank, which debts
credit facility form part of the assets of the bank. The
Furnishing false or make misrepresentations receiver must assemble the assets and pay
Attempt to defraud a bank the obligation of the bank under receivership
Offering any director, officer or employee any and take steps to prevent dissipation of such
gift, fee or commission assets. Accordingly, the receiver of the bank
is obliged to collect pre-existing debts due to
the bank, and in connection therewith, to
Conservatorship in Banks foreclose mortgages securing such debts.
FIRST PHILIPPINE INTERNATIONAL BANK SPS. CESAR A. LARROBIS, JR. and VIRGINIA
(Formerly Producers Bank of the Philippines) S. LARROBIS, petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE
and MERCURIO RIVERA, petitioners, vs. VETERANS BANK, respondent. (G.R. No.
COURT OF APPEALS, CARLOS EJERCITO, in 135706. October 1, 2004.)
substitution of DEMETRIO DEMETRIA, and
JOSE JANOLO, respondents. (G.R. No. 115849. The appointment of a receiver operates to
January 24, 1996.) suspend the authority of the bank and of its
directors and officers over its property and
effects, such authority being reposed in the
P a g e | 55
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
receiver, and in this respect, the receivership The receiver shall determine as soon as
is equivalent to an injunction to restrain the possible, but not later than ninety (90) days
bank officers from intermeddling with the from take over, whether the institution may
property of the bank in any way. (65 Am. Jur. be rehabilitated or otherwise placed in such
2d Receivers, §146 [1963]. In a nutshell, the a condition so that it may be permitted to
insolvency of a bank and the consequent resume business with safety to its
appointment of a receiver restrict the bank's depositors and creditors and the general
capacity to act, especially in relation to its public: Provided, that any determination for
property. the resumption of business of the institution
shall be subject to prior approval of the
MIGUELA R. VILLANUEVA, RICHARD R. Monetary Board. (section 30, NCBA)
VILLANUEVA, and MERCEDITA
VILLANUEVA-TIRADOS, petitioners, vs.
COURT OF APPEALS, CENTRAL BANK OF DEPOSIT INSURANCE
THE PHILIPPINES, ILDEFONSO C. ONG, and
PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK, ROLE OF THE PDIC
respondents. (G.R. No. 114870. May 26,
1995.) 1. Insure the deposits of all banks which are
entitled to the benefits of insurance and
The Monetary Board may summarily and which shall have all the powers granted by
without need for prior hearing forbid the law
institution from doing business in the 2. It shall serve as a basic policy, promote and
Philippines and designate the Philippine safeguard the interests of the depositing
Deposit Insurance Corporation as receiver of public by way of providing permanent and
the banking institution. continuing insurance coverage on all
insured deposits
For a quasi-bank, any person of recognized
competence in banking or finance may be The Philippine Deposit Insurance
designed as receiver. (Section 30, NCBA) Corporation (PDIC) was created by law and,
as such, is governed primarily by the
"The designation of a conservator under provisions of the special law creating it. The
Section 29 of this Act or the appointment of a liability of the PDIC for insured deposits
receiver under this section shall be vested therefore is statutory and, under Republic
exclusively with the Monetary Board. Act No. 3591, as amended, such liability
Furthermore, the designation of a rests upon the existence of deposits with
conservator is not a precondition to the the insured bank, not on the negotiability
designation of a receiver." or non-negotiability of the certificates
evidencing these deposits.
*Congress itself has recognized that a bank
receiver only has powers of administration. The authority for this conclusion finds
Section 30 of the New Central Bank Act support in decisions by American state courts
expressly provides that "[t]he receiver shall applying their respective bank guaranty laws.
immediately gather and take charge of all the The fact that the certificates state that the
assets and liabilities of the institution, certificates are insured by PDIC does not ipso
administer the same for the benefit of its facto make the latter liable for the same
creditors, and exercise the general powers of should the contingency insured against arise.
a receiver under the Revised Rules of Court As stated earlier, the deposit liability of PDIC
but shall not, with the exception of is determined by the provisions of R.A. No.
administrative expenditures, pay or commit 3591, and statements in the certificates that
any act that will involve the transfer or the same are insured by PDIC are not binding
disposition of any asset of the institution . . .“ upon the latter.
ABACUS REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT PHILIPPINE DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CENTER, INC., petitioner, vs. THE MANILA CORPORATION, petitioner, vs. COURT OF
BANKING CORPORATION, respondent. APPEALS, ROSA AQUERO, GERARD YU,
(G.R. No. 162270. April 6, 2005.) ERIC YU, MINA YU, ELIZABETH NGKAION,
MERLY CUESCANO, LETICIA TAN, FELY
RUMBANA, LORNA ACUB, represented by
P a g e | 56
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
there is a deviation from the client’s 2. Shall not be used as an instrument to hamper
profile/past transactions; competition in trade and commerce;
the transaction is related to an unlawful 3. No case for money laundering may be filed to
activity/offense under the AMLA; and the prejudice of a candidate for an electoral
transactions similar or analogous to the office during an election period
above
Restitution for any aggrieved party shall be
Provisional Remedies governed by the provisions of the Civil Code.
No person may be prosecuted under the
Freezing of Monetary Instruments or penal provisions of the AMLA for acts
Property under Section 10 committed prior to the enactment of the law
Authority to inquire into Bank Deposits on 17 October 2001.
under Section 11 When there is a suspicious transaction report
or a covered transaction report deemed
The Court of Appeals, upon application ex suspicious after investigation by the AMLC
parte (without notice to the other party) by and the court has, in a petition filed for the
the AMLC and after determination that purpose, ordered the seizure of any
probable cause exists that any monetary monetary instrument or propert, in whole or
instrument or property is in any way related in part, directly or indirectly, related to said
to an unlawful activity, may issue a freeze report, the Revised Rules on Court on
order which shall be effective immediately. forfeiture shall apply.
The freeze order shall be for a period of 20
days unless extended by the court The primary objective of a freeze order is to
temporarily preserve monetary instruments
Freezing of Monetary Instruments or or property that are in any way related to an
Property under Section 10 – Involves unlawful activity or money laundering, by
physical seizure of the assets preventing the owner from utilizing them
Authority to inquire into Bank Deposits during the duration of the freeze order. The
under Section 11 – does not involve physical effectivity of the freeze order was limited to a
seizure of the assets period not exceeding six months, which may
be extended by the CA should it become
Authority to inquire into bank deposits completely necessary. Nonetheless, when the
Republic has not offered any explanation why
Not a search warrant it took six years before a civil forfeiture case
Right to notice and right to be heard was filed in court, it can only be concluded
that the continued extension of the freeze
Related Web of Accounts order beyond the six-month period violated
the party’s right to due process. (Ret. Lt. Gen.
Provisional remedy on freeze of accounts Jacinto Ligot, et. al. vs. Republic of the
covers as well related web of accounts. Philippines, G.R. No. 176944, March 6, 2013)
Related web of accounts is defined as those
accounts, the funds and sources of which
originated from and/or materially linked to SECRECY OF BANK DEPOSITS AND FOREIGN
the monetary instrument (s) or properties CURRENCY DEPOSITS LAW
subject of the freeze order.
On the one hand, Republic Act No. 1405 provides
Mutual Assistance among States for four (4) exceptions when records of deposits
may be disclosed. These are under any of the
Request for assistance from a foreign state, following instances: a) upon written permission
based on the principles of mutuality and of the depositor, (b) in cases of impeachment, (c)
reciprocity. upon order of a competent court in the case of
AMLC may also obtain assistance from a bribery or dereliction of duty of public officials
foreign state or, (d) when the money deposited or invested is
the subject matter of the litigation, and e) in
Prohibitions cases of violation of the Anti-Money Laundering
Act (AMLA), the Anti-Money Laundering Council
1. Shall not be used for political persecution or (AMLC) may inquire into a bank account upon
harassment; order of any competent court. On the other hand,
P a g e | 58
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
the lone exception to the non-disclosure of other hand, Republic Act No. 6426 was intended
foreign currency deposits, under Republic Act to encourage deposits from foreign lenders and
No. 6426, is disclosure upon the written investors. It is a special law designed especially
permission of the depositor. for foreign currency deposits in the Philippines.
A general law does not nullify a specific or
These two laws both support the confidentiality special law. Generalia specialibus non derogant.
of bank deposits. There is no conflict between Therefore, it is beyond cavil that Republic Act
them. Republic Act No. 1405 was enacted for the No. 6426 applies in this case.
purpose of giving encouragement to the people
to deposit their money in banking institutions GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM,
and to discourage private hoarding so that the petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE 15TH
same may be properly utilized by banks in DIVISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS and
authorized loans to assist in the economic INDUSTRIAL BANK OF KOREA, TONG YANG
development of the country. It covers all bank MERCHANT BANK, HANAREUM BANKING
deposits in the Philippines and no distinction CORP., LAND BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES,
was made between domestic and foreign WESTMONT BANK and DOMSAT HOLDINGS,
deposits. Thus, Republic Act No. 1405 is INC., respondents. [G.R. No. 189206. June 8,
considered a law of general application. On the 2011.]
P a g e | 59
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Intellectual property rights" have furthermore been defined under Section 4 of the Code to consist of:
a) Copyright and Related Rights; b) Trademarks and Service Marks; c) Geographic Indications; d)
Industrial Designs; e) Patents; f) Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits; and g)
Protection of Undisclosed Information. (Coca-Cola Bottlers, Phils., Inc. vs. Quintin J. Gomez, et al., G.R.
No. 154491, November 14, 2008)
Section 22. Non-Patentable Inventions. - The (a) The employee, if the inventive activity
following shall be excluded from patent is not a part of his regular duties even if
protection: the employee uses the time, facilities and
materials of the employer.
22.1. Discoveries, scientific theories and
mathematical methods; (b) The employer, if the invention is the
result of the performance of his regularly-
22.2. Schemes, rules and methods of performing assigned duties, unless there is an
mental acts, playing games or doing business, agreement, express or implied, to the
and programs for computers; contrary. (n)
22.3. Methods for treatment of the human or Section 31. Right of Priority. - An application
animal body by surgery or therapy and for patent filed by any person who has
diagnostic methods practiced on the human or previously applied for the same invention in
animal body. This provision shall not apply to another country which by treaty, convention,
products and composition for use in any of these or law affords similar privileges to Filipino
methods; citizens, shall be considered as filed as of the
date of filing the foreign application:
22.4. Plant varieties or animal breeds or Provided, That: (a) the local application
essentially biological process for the production expressly claims priority; (b) it is filed within
of plants or animals. This provision shall not twelve (12) months from the date the earliest
apply to micro-organisms and non-biological and foreign application was filed; and (c) a
microbiological processes. certified copy of the foreign application
together with an English translation is filed
Provisions under this subsection shall not preclude within six (6) months from the date of filing
Congress to consider the enactment of a law in the Philippines. (Sec. 15, R.A. No. 165a)
providing sui generis protection of plant varieties
and animal breeds and a system of community
intellectual rights protection: GROUNDS FOR CANCELLATION
22.6. Anything which is contrary to public order 61.1. Any interested person may, upon
or morality. (Sec. 8, R.A. No. 165a) payment of the required fee, petition to
cancel the patent or any claim thereof, or
OWNERSHIP OF PATENT parts of the claim, on any of the following
grounds:
Section 29. First to File Rule. - If two (2) or
more persons have made the invention (a) That what is claimed as the
separately and independently of each other, invention is not new or Patentable;
the right to the patent shall belong to the
person who filed an application for such (b) That the patent does not disclose
invention, or where two or more applications the invention in a manner sufficiently
are filed for the same invention, to the clear and complete for it to be carried
applicant who has the earliest filing date or, out by any person skilled in the art; or;
the earliest priority date. (3rd sentence, Sec.
10, R.A. No. 165a.)
P a g e | 62
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
(c) That the patent is contrary to Section 81. Defenses in Action for
public order or morality. Infringement. - In an action for
infringement, the defendant, in addition
61.2. Where the grounds for cancellation to other defenses available to him, may
relate to some of the claims or parts of the show the invalidity of the patent, or any
claim, cancellation may be effected to such claim thereof, on any of the grounds on
extent only. (Secs. 28 and 29, R.A. No. 165a) which a petition of cancellation can be
brought under Section 61 hereof. (Sec. 45,
Section 65. Cancellation of the Patent. - 65.1. R.A. No. 165)
If the Committee finds that a case for
cancellation has been proved, it shall order Section 82. Patent Found Invalid May be
the patent or any specified claim or claims Cancelled. - In an action for infringement,
thereof cancelled. if the court shall find the patent or any
claim to be invalid, it shall cancel the
65.2. If the Committee finds that, taking into same, and the Director of Legal Affairs
consideration the amendment made by the upon receipt of the final judgment of
patentee during the cancellation proceedings, cancellation by the court, shall record that
the patent and the invention to which it fact in the register of the Office and shall
relates meet the requirement of this Act, it publish a notice to that effect in the IPO
may decide to maintain the patent as Gazette. (Sec. 46, R.A. No. 165a)
amended: Provided, That the fee for printing
of a new patent is paid within the time limit Patent Infringement
prescribed in the Regulations.
Ordinarily understood to mean as the
65.3. If the fee for the printing of a new unauthorized replication or use of a
patent is not paid in due time, the patent patented invention or process.
should be revoked. Technically, however, patent
infringement is committed either literally
65.4. If the patent is amended under or by equivalents.
Subsection
Literal infringement exists when every
65.5. Thereof, the Bureau shall, at the same limitation recited in a patent claim is
time as it publishes the mention of the found in the infringing device (or
cancellation decision, publish the abstract, process). Infringement by equivalents, on
representative claims and drawings the other hand, happens when a device
indicating clearly what the amendments (or process) appropriates a prior
consist of. (n) invention by incorporating its innovative
concept and, although with some
Section modification and change, performs
66. Effect of Cancellation of Patent or substantially the same function in
Claim. - The rights conferred by the substantially the same way to achieve
patent or any specified claim or claims substantially the same result.
cancelled shall terminate. Notice of the
cancellation shall be published in the IPO Doctrine of Equivalents
Gazette. Unless restrained by the Director
General, the decision or order to cancel by Legal Basis:
Director of Legal Affairs shall be Section 75.2. For the purpose of
immediately executory even pending determining the extent of protection
appeal. (Sec. 32, R.A. No. 165a) conferred by the patent, due account shall
be taken of elements which are equivalent
Section 79. Limitation of Action for to the elements expressed in the claims,
Damages. - No damages can be recovered so that a claim shall be considered to
for acts of infringement committed more cover not only all the elements as
than four (4) years before the institution expressed therein, but also equivalents.
of the action for infringement. (Sec. 43, (n)
R.A. No. 165)
(a)n infringement also occurs when a
device appropriates a prior invention by
P a g e | 63
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
incorporating its innovative concept and, Registration gives the trademark owner the
albeit with some modification and change, exclusive right to use the mark and to
performs substantially the same function prevent others from using the same or
in substantially the same way to achieve similar marks on identical or related goods
substantially the same result." The reason and services.
for the doctrine of equivalents is that to
permit the imitation of a patented The right to a trademark is granted to the one
invention which does not copy any literal who first files a trademark application with
detail would be to convert the protection the IP Philippines. Before applying for
of the patent grant into a hollow and trademark registration, it would help if you
useless thing. Such imitation would leave conduct a search in the trademarks database
room for - indeed encourage - the to determine if there are identical or similar
unscrupulous copyist to make marks that would prevent the registration of
unimportant and insubstantial changes your mark. This is to prevent future conflicts
and substitutions in the patent which, with marks that are already registered or
though adding nothing, would be enough with earlier filing dates.
to take the copied matter outside the
claim, and hence outside the reach of the What cannot be registered
law. Pascual Godines v. Court of Appeals,
et al. (G.R. No. 97343), September 13, DESCRIPTIVE
1993 Smith Kline Beckman Corp. v. Court
of Appeals, et al. (G.R. No. 126627), These are marks that describe the
August 14, 2003) characteristics of the goods or services.
MISLEADING
TRADEMARKS
Marks that are likely to deceive or have the
A trademark can be one word, a group of tendency to misinform the consumers about
words, sign, symbol, logo, or a the actual characteristics of the goods or
combination of any of these. Generally, a services.
trademark refers to both trademark and
service mark, although a service mark is GENERIC and customary to trade
used to identify those marks used for
services only. Generic marks are names of products they
seek to identify.
Section 121.1. "Mark" means any visible
sign capable of distinguishing the goods CONSISTS OF NAMES, PORTRAITS OF
(trademark) or services (service mark) of PERSONS, MAPS, FLAGS AND OTHER
an enterprise and shall include a stamped POLITICAL SYMBOLS
or marked container of goods; (Sec. 38,
R.A. No. 166a) Marks that contain names or portraits of
Section 121.2. "Collective mark" means living individuals may be rejected unless the
any visible sign designated as such in the individual gives written consent
application for registration and capable of
distinguishing the origin or any other SHAPE AND COLOR
common characteristic, including the
quality of goods or services of different Shapes must be distinctive from the usual
enterprises which use the sign under the shape of goods or containers of the goods, in
control of the registered owner of the order to be considered a trademark.
collective mark; (Sec. 40, R.A. No. 166a)
MARKS THAT MAY CAUSE CONFUSION
Section 122. How Marks are Acquired. -
The rights in a mark shall be acquired Your mark cannot be registered if it is
through registration made validly in identical with or similar to a registered mark
accordance with the provisions of this or a mark with earlier filing date for goods
law. (Sec. 2-A, R A. No. 166a) and services that are exactly the same or for
goods and services that are related.
P a g e | 64
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Consumers should not confuse your mark That the infringement takes place at the
with the marks of others. moment any of the acts stated in
Subsection 155.1 or this subsection are
Identical with, or confusingly similar to committed regardless of whether there is
WELL-KNOWN MARKS actual sale of goods or services using the
infringing material.
Marks that are identical with or similar to
marks that are known internationally and, in The Elements of infringement under R.A. No.
the Philippines, will be refused registration 8293 are as follows:
also on the other features appearing on the appearance of the goods; and (2) intent to
labels. deceive the public and defraud a competitor.
SUPERIOR COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES
In cases involving trademark infringement, INC., vs. KUNNAN ENTERPRISES LTD. AND
no set of rules can be deduced. Each case SPORTS CONCEPT & DISTRIBUTOR, INC.,
must be decided on its own merits. G.R.No.169974, April 2010
Jurisprudential precedents must be studied
in the light of the facts of each particular case. In McDonald’s Corporation v. L.C. Big Mak
Burger, Inc., we held that there can be
Withal, the protection of trademarks as trademark infringement without unfair
intellectual property is intended not only to competition such as when the infringer
preserve the goodwill and reputation of the discloses on the labels containing the
business established on the goods bearing mark that he manufactures the goods,
the mark through actual use over a period of thus preventing the public from being
time, but also to safeguard the public as deceived that the goods originate from the
consumers against confusion on these goods. trademark owner. SUPERIOR
While respondent’s shoes contain some COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES INC., vs.
dissimilarities with petitioner’s shoes, this KUNNAN ENTERPRISES LTD. AND SPORTS
Court cannot close its eye to the fact that for CONCEPT & DISTRIBUTOR, INC.,
all intents and purpose, respondent had G.R.No.169974, April 2010
deliberately attempted to copy petitioner’s
mark and overall design and features of the Hoarding is not Unfair Competition and does
shoes. Let it be remembered, that defendants not fall within IP Code
in cases of infringement do not normally copy
but only make colorable changes. The most Given the IP Code's specific focus, a first test
successful form of copying is to employ that should be made when a question arises
enough points of similarity to confuse the on whether a matter is covered by the Code is
public, with enough points of difference to to ask if it refers to an intellectual property as
confuse the courts. SKECHERS USA, INC., vs. defined in the Code. If it does not, then
INTER PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL TRADING coverage by the Code may be negated.
CORPORATION, GR no.164321 (March
2011) A second test, if a disputed matter does not
expressly refer to an intellectual property
Jurisprudence also formulated the following right as defined above, is whether it falls
“true test” of unfair competition: whether under the general "unfair competition"
the acts of the defendant have the intent of concept and definition under Sections 168.1
deceiving or are calculated to deceive the and 168.2 of the Code. The question then is
ordinary buyer making his purchases under whether there is "deception" or any other
the ordinary conditions of the particular similar act in "passing off" of goods or
trade to which the controversy relates. One of services to be those of another who enjoys
the essential requisites in an action to established goodwill.
restrain unfair competition is proof of fraud;
the intent to deceive, actual or probable must Under all the above approaches, we conclude
be shown before the right to recover can that the "hoarding" - as defined and charged
exist. SUPERIOR COMMERCIAL by the petitioner - does not fall within the
ENTERPRISES INC., vs. KUNNAN coverage of the IP Code and of Section 168 in
ENTERPRISES LTD. AND SPORTS CONCEPT particular. It does not relate to any patent,
& DISTRIBUTOR, INC., G.R.No.169974, trademark, trade name or service mark that
April 2010 the respondents have invaded, intruded into
or used without proper authority from the
Unfair competition has been defined as the petitioner. Nor are the respondents alleged to
passing off (or palming off) or attempting to be fraudulently "passing off" their products
pass off upon the public of the goods or or services as those of the petitioner. The
business of one person as the goods or respondents are not also alleged to be
business of another with the end and undertaking any representation or
probable effect of deceiving the public. The misrepresentation that would confuse or
essential elements of unfair competition are tend to confuse the goods of the petitioner
(1) confusing similarity in the general with those of the respondents, or vice versa.
P a g e | 66
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
What in fact the petitioner alleges is an act Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. vs.
foreign to the Code, to the concepts it Supergreen, Inc., (G.R. No. 161823, March
embodies and to the acts it regulates; as 22, 2007)
alleged, hoarding inflicts unfairness by
seeking to limit the opposition's sales by
depriving it of the bottles it can use for these COPYRIGHT
sales. (Coca-Cola Bottlers, Phils., Inc. vs.
Quintin J. Gomez, et al., G.R. No. 154491, Copyright is the legal protection extended to
November 14, 2008) the owner of the rights in an original work.
Right of Integrity (object to any music, the film director, and the author of the
prejudicial distortion) work so adapted.
Right to restrain use of his name.
In calculating the term of protection, the term
Related Rights in Copyright: of protection subsequent to the death of the
author shall run from the date of his death or
Authors create works to disseminate them to of publication, but such terms shall always be
as large an audience as possible. Obviously, deemed to begin on the first day of January of
they cannot do the dissemination by the year following the event which gave rise
themselves. They need the help of persons or to them (i.e. death, publication, making).
entities who contribute substantial creative,
technical or organizational skill in the Copyright protection is not intended to give
process of making the works available to the the copyright owner absolute control over all
public and whose interests ought to be possible exploitation of his work. The law
protected to encourage them to continue provides for limitations (“statutory fair
with their work. Hence, their rights are uses”) on the economic rights of authors
referred to as “related rights” or “neighboring comprising of acts which do not constitute
rights” since they are related to or are copyright infringement even if done without
neighboring on the author’s copyright. the consent of the copyright holder
The related rights of: (a) performers; (b) Copyright infringement consists in infringing
producers of sound recordings; and (c) any right secured or protected under the
broadcasting organizations. Code. It may also consist in aiding or abetting
such infringement.
The natural person who created the literary
and artistic work owns the copyright to the The law also provides for the liability of a
same. person who at the time when copyright
subsists in a work has in his possession an
For work created during or in the course of article which he knows, or ought to know, to
employment (works for hire): be an infringing copy of the work for the
purpose of:
Employee - if the work is not part of his
regular duties, even if he used the time, Selling or letting for hire, or by way of
facilities and materials of the employer; trade offering or exposing for sale or
Employer - if the work is the result of the hire, the article;
performance of his regularly assigned duties Distributing the article for the
unless there is an express or implied purpose of trade, or for any other
agreement to the contrary. purpose to an extent that will
prejudice the rights of the copyright
For commissioned works: the person who owner in the work; or
commissioned the work owns the work but Trade exhibit of the article in public.
the copyright thereto remains with the
creator unless there is a written agreement Copyright, in the strict sense of the term, is
to the contrary. purely a statutory right. It is a new or
independent right granted by the statute, and
For audiovisual works: the producer, the not simply a pre-existing right regulated by
author of the scenario, the composer of the it. Being a statutory grant, the rights are only
music, the film director, and the author of the such as the statute confers, and may be
work so adapted. obtained and enjoyed only with respect to
the subjects and by the persons, and on terms
In general, the term of protection of and conditions specified in the statute.
copyright for original and derivative works is Accordingly, it can cover only the works
the life of the author plus fifty (50) years falling within the statutory enumeration or
after his death. The Code specifies the terms description.
of protection for the different types of works.
A copyright certificate provides prima facie
For audiovisual works: the producer, the evidence of originality which is one element
author of the scenario, the composer of the of copyright validity. It constitutes prima
P a g e | 68
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
facie evidence of both validity and ownership The presentation of master tapes is not
and the validity of the facts stated in the always necessary to meet the requirement of
certificate. probable cause in copyright infringement
cases
When is there a substantial reproduction of a
book? It does not necessarily require that the It is true that such master tapes are object
entire copyrighted work, or even a large evidence, with the merit that in this class of
portion of it, be copied. If so much is taken evidence the ascertainment of the
that the value of the original work is controverted fact is made through
substantially diminished, there is an demonstrations involving the direct use of
infringement of copyright and to an injurious the senses of the presiding magistrate. Such
extent, the work is appropriated. auxiliary procedure, however, does not rule
out the use of testimonial or documentary
Pacita I. Habana, et al. vs. Felicidad C. evidence, depositions, admissions or other
Robles, et al., G.R. No. 131522, July 19, classes of evidence tending to prove the
1999; Filipino Society of Composers vs. factum probandum, especially where the
Benjamin Tan, (G.R. No. L-36402, March 16, production in court of object evidence would
1987) result in delay, inconvenience or expenses
out of proportion to its evidentiary value.
The essence of a copyright infringement is
the similarity or at least substantial similarity Columbia Pictures, Inc. vs. Court of
of the purported pirated works to the Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 110318, August 28,
copyrighted work. Hence, the applicant must 1996; Columbia Pictures Entertainment,
present to the court the copyrighted films to Inc., et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R.
compare them with the purchased evidence No. 111267, September 20, 1996; People
of the video tapes allegedly pirated to of the Phil., et al. vs. Christopher Choi, (G.R.
determine whether the latter is an No. 152950, August 3, 2006)
unauthorized reproduction of the former.
This linkage of the copyrighted films to the At most, the certificates of registration and
pirated films must be established to satisfy deposit issued by the National Library and
the requirements of probable cause. Mere the Supreme Court Library serve merely as a
allegations as to the existence of the notice of recording and registration of the
copyrighted films cannot serve as basis for work but do not confer any right or title upon
the issuance of a search warrant. the registered copyright owner or
automatically put his work under the
20th Century Fox Film Corp. vs. Court of protective mantle of the copyright law. It is
Appeals, G.R. Nos. L-76649-51, August 19, not a conclusive proof of copyright
1988; Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc., ownership. As it is, non-registration and
et al. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., (G.R. No. deposit of the work within the prescribed
97156, October 6, 1994) period only makes the copyright owner liable
to pay a fine.
Infringement of a copyright is a trespass on a
private domain owned and occupied by the Manly Sportwear Mfg., Inc. vs. Dadodette
owner of the copyright, and, therefore, Ent., et al., (G.R. No. 165306, September 20,
protected by law, and infringement of 2005)
copyright, or piracy, which is a synonymous
term in this connection, consists in the doing It is not the application or registration of a
by any person, without the consent of the trademark that vests ownership thereof, but
owner of the copyright, of anything the sole it is the ownership of a trademark that
right to do which is conferred by statute on confers the right to register the same.
the owner of the copyright. Registration merely creates a prima facie
presumption of the validity of the
Pacita I. Habana, et al. vs. Felicidad C. registration, of the registrant’s ownership of
Robles, et al., G.R. No. 131522, July 19, the trademark, and of the exclusive right to
1999; Wilson Ong Ching Kian Chuan vs. the use thereof; it is rebuttable; thus, it must
Court of Appeals, et al., (G.R. No. 130360, give way to evidence to the contrary.
August 15, 2000)
P a g e | 69
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Birkenstock Orthopaedie Gmbh and Co. business of another with the end and
Kg vs. Philippine Shoe Expo Marketing probable effect of deceiving the public. The
Corporation, (G.R. No. 194307, November 20, mere use of the LPG cylinders for refilling
2013) and reselling, which bear the trademarks
"GASUL" and "SHELLANE" will give the LPGs
The gravamen of the offense of infringement sold by REGASCO the general appearance of
of a registered trademark is the likelihood of the products of the petitioners.
confusion. In applying the Holistic Test,
confusion was remote because the jeans Republic Gas Corporation (REGASCO), et.
made and sold by Levi’s Philippines were not al. vs. Petron Corporation, et. al., (G.R. No.
only very popular but also quite expensive, as 194062, June 17, 2013)
opposed to Diaz’s tailored jeans which were
acquired on a “made-to-order” basis; Under the Paris Convention to which the
moreover, since the jeans are expensive, the Philippines is a signatory, a trade name of a
casual buyer is predisposed to be more national of a State that is a party to the Paris
cautious and discriminating in and would Convention, whether or not the trade name
prefer to mull over his purchase. (Victorio forms part of a trademark, is protected
Diaz vs. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. without the obligation of filing or
180677, February 18, 2013) registration. It follows then that the applicant
for registration of trademark is not the lawful
The mere unauthorized use of a container owner thereof and is not entitled to
bearing a registered trademark in connection registration if the trademark has been in
with the sale, distribution or advertising of prior use by a national of a country which is a
goods or services which is likely to cause signatory to the Paris Convention.
confusion among the buyers or consumers EcoleDe Cuisine Manille (Cordon Bleu of
can be considered as trademark the Philippines), Inc. vs. Renaus Cointreau
infringement. Petitioners’ act of refilling, & Cie and Le Cordon Bleu Int’l, B.V., (G.R.
without the respondents’ consent, the LPG No. 185830, June 5, 2013)
containers bearing the registered marks of
the respondents will inevitably confuse the
consuming public, who may also be led to
believe that the petitioners were authorized
refillers and distributors of respondent’s LPG
products.
Sec. 48. Striking out indorsement. - The Endorser binds himself to pay, upon no other
holder may at any time strike out any condition than the failure of the parties to do
indorsement which is not necessary to so, and of due notice to him of such failure
his title. The indorser whose
indorsement is struck out, and all Sec. 119. Instrument; how discharged. - A
indorsers subsequent to him, are negotiable instrument is discharged:
thereby relieved from liability on the
instrument. (a.) By payment in due course by or on
behalf of the principal debtor;
Where the holder of an instrument (b.) By payment in due course by the party
payable to his order transfers it for accommodated, where the instrument
value without indorsing it, the transfer is made or accepted for his
vests in the transferee such title as the accommodation;
transferor had therein, and the (c.) By the intentional cancellation thereof
transferee acquires in addition, the by the holder;
right to have the indorsement of the (d.) By any other act which will discharge a
transferor. simple contract for the payment of
money;
Sec. 47. Continuation of negotiable (e.) When the principal debtor becomes
character. - An instrument negotiable the holder of the instrument at or after
in its origin continues to be negotiable maturity in his own right.
until it has been restrictively indorsed
or discharged by payment or Sec. 38. Qualified indorsement. - A
otherwise. qualified indorsement constitutes the
indorser a mere assignor of the title to the
Sec. 34. Special indorsement; indorsement in instrument. It may be made by adding to
blank. - A special indorsement specifies the the indorser's signature the words
person to whom, or to whose order, the "without recourse" or any words of
instrument is to be payable, and the similar import. Such an indorsement does
P a g e | 72
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
LIABILITIES OF PARTIES
PARTY LIABILITY
Sec. 60. Liability of maker. - The maker of a negotiable instrument, by making it,
Maker engages that he will pay it according to its tenor, and admits the existence of the
payee and his then capacity to indorse.
Sec. 61. Liability of drawer. - The drawer by drawing the instrument admits the
existence of the payee and his then capacity to indorse; and engages that, on due
presentment, the instrument will be accepted or paid, or both, according to its
tenor, and that if it be dishonored and the necessary proceedings on dishonor be
Drawer
duly taken, he will pay the amount thereof to the holder or to any subsequent
indorser who may be compelled to pay it. But the drawer may insert in the
instrument an express stipulation negativing or limiting his own liability to the
holder.
Sec. 62. Liability of acceptor. - The acceptor, by accepting the instrument, engages
that he will pay it according to the tenor of his acceptance and admits:
Acceptor a. The existence of the drawer, the genuineness of his signature, and his capacity
and authority to draw the instrument; and
b. The existence of the payee and his then capacity to indorse.
Acceptor is liable only to the original tenor of • In all other cases, it is necessary that;
the bill prior to alteration since section 132 • Protest for nonpayment by drawee is
defines acceptance as “assent to the order of necessary to charge an acceptor for
the drawer.” honor(sec.167); and
• Protest for nonpayment by the
Sec. 63. When a person deemed indorser. - A acceptor for honor is also required
person placing his signature upon an (sec.170)
instrument otherwise than as maker, drawer,
or acceptor, is deemed to be indorser unless What constitutes sufficient presentment
he clearly indicates by appropriate words his
intention to be bound in some other capacity. Sec. 72. What constitutes a sufficient
presentment. - Presentment for payment, to
Is there any order in which indorsers are be sufficient, must be made:
liable? (a) By the holder, or by some person
authorized to receive payment on his
Sec. 68. Order in which indorsers are liable. - As behalf;
respect one another, indorsers are liable prima (b) At a reasonable hour on a business day;
facie in the order in which they indorse; but (c) At a proper place as herein defined; To
evidence is admissible to show that, as between the person primarily liable on the
or among themselves, they have agreed instrument, or if he is absent or
otherwise. Joint payees or joint indorsees who inaccessible, to any person found at the
indorse are deemed to indorse jointly and place where the presentment is made.
severally.
Sec. 74. Instrument must be exhibited. - The
Primarily liable – Maker and Acceptor instrument must be exhibited to the person
Secondarily liable - Drawer and Indorser from whom payment is demanded, and when
it is paid, must be delivered up to the party
For PNs, it is necessary that: paying it.
• Presentment for payment must be Sec. 79. When presentment not required to
made to the person primarily liable charge the drawer. - Presentment for
(sec.71) payment is not required in order to charge
• If the PN is dishonored by the drawer where he has no right to expect or
nonpayment, notice of dishonor by require that the drawee or acceptor will pay
nonpayment must be given to the the instrument.
person secondarily liable (sec.80)
unless excused.
P a g e | 74
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
partners or not; but not to two or more bank itself payable to a third person. Similar
drawees in the alternative or in succession. to cashier’s check.
Sec. 130. When bill may be treated as 3. Memorandum Check – Check given by the
promissory note. - Where in a bill the drawer borrower to a lender for the amount of a
and drawee are the same person or where short loan, with the understanding that it will
the drawee is a fictitious person or a person not be presented to a bank, but will be
not having capacity to contract, the holder redeemed by maker himself when the loan
may treat the instrument at his option either falls due and which understanding is
as a bill of exchange or as a promissory note. evidenced by the writing the word
“memorandum,” “memo” on the check
Sec. 136. Time allowed drawee to accept. - The Thus, Cenizal’s presentment of the check to the
drawee is allowed twenty-four hours after drawee bank 120 days (four months) after its
presentment in which to decide whether or issue was still within the allowable period.
not he will accept the bill; the acceptance, if Petitioner was freed neither from the obligation
given, dates as of the day of presentation. to keep sufficient funds in his account nor from
liability resulting from the dishonor of the check.
Note: After 24 hours, drawee fails to return
instrument, he will be presumed to have
impliedly accepted. SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES ON NEGOTIABLE
INSTRUMENTS LAW
Kinds of Checks
ON NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW
1. Cashier’s Check - Drawn by cashier of bank,
The principal consideration always to answer
in the name of the bank against the bank
itself payable to a third person or order. any purported question on negotiable
instruments is to determine first whether indeed
2. Manager’s Check – Drawn by the manager of it is negotiable and compliant with the provision
a bank in the name of the bank against the of section 1 of the Negotiable Instruments Law.
P a g e | 77
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
In the case of Rodrigo Rivera vs. Spouses Chua down under Article 11703 of the Civil Code of the
(GR no.184458, January 14, 2015), the Supreme Philippines.
Court noted that a promissory note made out to
What are the effects of a manager’s check and
a specific person is not a negotiable instrument,
a cashier’s check, and is the payment therein
it is not even payable to order or bearer.
subject to the condition that the payee
In the same case, the Supreme Court reiterated complies with his obligations to the purchaser
that Section 1 of the Negotiable Instruments Law of the checks?
requires the concurrence of the following
The Supreme Court in the case of Metropolitan
elements, and that the absence of one makes the
Bank vs. Chiok (GR no.172652, November 26,
instrument non-negotiable,1 to wit:
2014) stated that,” The legal effects of a
1. It must be in writing and signed by the manager’s check and a cashier’s check are the
maker or drawer; same. A manager’s check, like a cashier’s check, is
2. It must contain an unconditional an order of the bank to pay, drawn upon itself,
promise or order to pay a sum certain
committing in effect its total resources, integrity,
in money;
3. Must be payable on demand, or at a and honor behind its issuance. By its peculiar
fixed or determinable future time; character and general use in commerce, a
4. Must be payable to order or bearer; manager’s check or cashier’s check is regarded
and substantially to be as good as the money it
5. Where the instrument is addressed to represents.”
a drawee, he must be named or
otherwise indicated therein with The Supreme Court however warned that,
reasonable certainty. clearing of the manager’s check and cashier’s
checks should not be confused with acceptance.
This does not mean however that, even if the Manager’s and Cashier’s checks are still subject
instrument is not negotiable, there is no more to the clearing to ensure that the same have not
liability to be incurred under the terms of the been materially altered or otherwise completely
promissory note issued that remains to be counterfeited. It must be clarified however, that
unpaid. while they are subject to clearing, these checks
cannot be countermanded for being drawn up
Even if the promissory note is non-negotiable against a closed account, for being drawn up
and therefore outside of the coverage of section against insufficient funds, or for similar reasons
702 of the law which provides that presentment such as a condition not appearing on the face of
for payment is not necessary to charge the the check. The accepted banking practice is that
person liable on the instrument, liability for these checks are good as cash.
damages, including those who are guilty of delay
in the performance of their obligation is laid If a check is materially altered4, will the 24-
hour period for clearing apply?
in order to charge the person primarily liable on the alteration. Any alteration which changes:
instrument; but if the instrument is, by its terms,
payable at a special place, and he is able and a) The date;
willing to pay it there at maturity, such ability and
b) The sum payable, either for principal or interest;
willingness are equivalent to tender of payment
upon his part. But except as herein otherwise c) The time or place of payment;
provided, presentment for payment is necessary in
order to charge the drawer and indorsers. d) The number or the relation of the parties;
P a g e | 78
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
In Areza vs. Express Savings Bank (GR Company now seeks foreclosure. Is the
no.176697, September 10, 2014) , the Supreme Financing Company who holds the promissory
Court ruled that, “as a rule now stands, the 24 note a holder in due course?
hour period is still in force, that is, any check
which should be refused by the drawee bank in Yes. The Financing Company is a holder in due
course. Sec. 52 of the Negotiable Instruments
accordance with the long standing and accepted
Law (NIL) provides:
banking practices shall be returned through the
PCHC/local clearing office, as the case may be Section 52. What constitutes a holder in
not later than the next regular clearing (24 due course. A holder in due course is a
hour). holder who has taken the instrument
under the following conditions:
The modification, however, is that items which
have been the subject of material alteration or (a) That it is complete and regular upon
bearing forged endorsement may be returned its face;
even beyond the 24 hours so long that the same
is returned within the prescriptive period fixed (b) That he became the holder of it
by law. The prescriptive period is ten (10) years before it was overdue, and without
because a check or endorsement thereon is a notice that it had been previously
written contract. Moreover, the item need not be dishonored, if such was the fact;
returned through the clearing house but by (c) That he took it in good faith and for
direct presentation to the presenting bank.” value;
A promissory note was indorsed to a financing (d) That at the time it was negotiated to
company, and a chattel mortgage over the him he had no notice of any infirmity in
property subject of the note was also assigned the instrument or defect in the title of the
to them. However, the actual property subject person negotiating it.
of the chattel was never delivered to the
mortgagee who decided not to pay the A holder in due course, holds the instrument free
principal loan as well since there was non- from any defect of title of prior parties and from
delivery of the property. The Financing defenses available to prior parties among
themselves, and may enforce payment of the
e) The medium or currency in which payment is to instrument for the full amount. Since the
be made; Or which adds a place of payment Financing Company is a holder in due course, the
where no place of payment is specified, or any mortgagor cannot raise the defense of non-
other change or addition which alters the effect
delivery of the object and nullity of the sale
of the instrument in any respect is a material
alteration.
against the corporation. The NIL considers every
negotiable instrument prima facie to have been
xxx issued for a valuable consideration. (Spouses
Section 124. Alteration of instrument; effect of.
Pedro Violago vs. BA Finance Corporation
Where a negotiable instrument is materially [2008])
altered without the assent of all parties liable
thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party
Can a check be used as evidence of
who has himself made, authorized, and assented indebtedness?
to the alteration and subsequent indorsers.
A check "constitutes an evidence of
But when the instrument has been materially indebtedness" and is a veritable "proof of an
altered and is in the hands of a holder in due
obligation.” Hence, it can be used "in lieu of and
course not a party to the alteration, he may
enforce the payment thereof according to its
for the same purpose as a promissory note. The
original tenor. (Emphasis ours.) Supreme Court has pointed out that a check
functions more than a promissory note since it
not only contains an undertaking to pay an
amount of money but is an "order addressed to a
P a g e | 79
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
bank and partakes of a representation that the Although a contract of suretyship is in essence
drawer has funds on deposit against which the accessory or collateral to a valid principal
check is drawn, sufficient to ensure payment obligation, the suretys liability to the creditor
upon its presentation to the bank. (Ting Ting is immediate, primary and absolute; he
Pua vs. Spouses Lo Ben Ting [2013]) is directly and equally bound with the
principal. As an equivalent of a regular party to
This very same principle underpins Section 24 of the undertaking, a surety becomes liable to the
the Negotiable Instruments Law (NIL), which debt and duty of the principal obligor even
provides as follows: without possessing a direct or personal interest
in the obligations nor does he receive any benefit
Section 24. Presumption of therefrom
consideration. – Every
negotiable instrument is
deemed prima facie to have
been issued for a valuable
consideration; and every
person whose signature
appears thereon to have
become a party for value.
charters. GOCCs with original charters are May a corporation sole convert into a
subject to COA pre-audit, while GOCCs corporation aggregate by mere amendment
without original charters are subject to COA of its articles of incorporation?
post-audit. GOCCs without original charters
refer to corporations created under the Yes. Section 109 of the Corporation Code allows
Corporation Code but are owned or the application to religious corporations of the
controlled by the government. The nature or general provisions governing non-stock
purpose of the corporation is not material in corporations.
determining COA's audit jurisdiction. Neither
is the manner of creation of a corporation, For non-stock corporations, the power to amend
whether under a general or special law. its articles of incorporation lies in its members.
The code requires two-thirds of their votes for
Stock Corporations – capital stock divided the approval of such an amendment. So how will
into shares and are authorized to distribute this requirement apply to a corporation sole that
profits on the basis of shares held. has technically but one member (the head of the
religious organization) who holds in his hands its
- par value broad corporate powers over the properties,
- no par value rights, and interests of his religious
organization?
Non-Stock – organized for non-profit
purposes, do not issue stocks and are Although a non-stock corporation has a
composed of persons called as members personality that is distinct from those of its
members who established it, its articles of
May no par value shares be issued by the incorporation cannot be amended solely through
corporation at different prices? the action of its board of trustees. The
amendment needs the concurrence of at least
Yes. "A no-par value share does not purport to two-thirds of its membership. If such approval
represent any stated proportionate interest in mechanism is made to operate in a corporation
the capital stock measured by value, but only an sole, its one member in whom all the powers of
aliquot part of the whole number of such shares the corporation technically belongs, needs to get
of the issuing corporation. The holder of no-par the concurrence of two-thirds of its membership.
shares may see from the certificate itself that he The one member, here the General
is only an aliquot sharer in the assets of the Superintendent, is but a trustee, according to
corporation. But this character of proportionate Section 110 of the Corporation Code, of its
interest is not hidden beneath a false appearance membership.
of a given sum in money, as in the case of par
value shares. The capital stock of a corporation Ecclesiastical – members are spiritual
issuing only no-par value shares is not set forth persons
by a stated amount of money, but instead is Lay – non-ecclesiastical corporations
expressed to be divided into a stated number of
shares, such as, 1,000 shares. This indicates that Foreign corporations are further classified
a shareholder of 100 such shares is an aliquot into (1) resident foreign corporations and (2)
sharer in the assets of the corporation, no matter non-resident foreign corporations.
what value they may have, to the extent of
100/1,000 or 1/10. A resident foreign corporation is a foreign
corporation engaged in trade or business
A corporation sole is "one formed by the within the Philippines or having an office or
chief archbishop, bishop, priest, minister, place of business therein while a non-
rabbi or other presiding elder of a religious resident foreign corporation is a foreign
denomination, sect, or church, for the corporation not engaged in trade or business
purpose of administering or managing, as within the Philippines and not having any
trustee, the affairs, properties and office or place of business therein.
temporalities of such religious denomination,
sect or church." A corporation aggregate De Jure – corporation formed with all
formed for the same purpose, on the other requirements of law
hand, consists of two or more persons. De Facto – defectively formed from a bona
fide attempt to incorporate under existing
laws and which exercises corporate powers
P a g e | 82
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Can there be a municipal corporation de the notion of legal entity is used to defeat
facto? public convenience, justify wrong, protect
fraud, or defend crime.
No. An unconstitutional act is not a law; it
confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it Siain Enterprises vs. Cupertino Realty
affords no protection; it creates no office; it Corp., et al., (G.R. No. 170782, June 22, 2009)
is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as
though it had never been passed." It is elementary that a corporation has a
personality distinct and separate from its
Corporation by estoppel is founded on individual stockholders or members. Being
principles of equity and is designed to an officer or stockholder of a corporation
prevent injustice and unfairness. It applies does not make one's property the property
when persons assume to form a corporation also of the corporation, for they are separate
and exercise corporate functions and enter entities.
into business relations with third persons.
Where there is no third person involved Adelio Cruz vs. Quiterio Dalisay, (A.M. No.
and the conflict arises only among those R-181-P, July 31, 1987); Traders Royal Bank
assuming the form of a corporation, who vs. Court of Appeals, (G.R. No. 78412,
therefore know that it has not been September 26, 1989)
registered there is no corporation by
estoppel. While a share of stock represents a
proportionate or aliquot interest in the
Reynaldo M. Lozano vs. Eliezer R. De Los property of the corporation, it does not vest
Santos, (G.R. No. 125221, June 19, 1997); Lim the owner thereof with any legal right or title
Tong Lim vs. Phil. Fishing Gear Industries, to any of the property, his interest in the
(G.R. No. 136448, November 3, 1999); Merrill corporate property being equitable or
Lynch Futures, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals beneficial in nature. Shareholders are in no
(G.R. No. 97816, July 24, 1992): People of the legal sense the owners of corporate property,
Phil. vs. Patricio Botero, (G.R. No. 117010, which is owned by the corporation as a
April 18, 1997) distinct legal person.
In case of corporations, citizenship of Solid Homes, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, (G.R.
corporation shall follow citizenship of the No. 117501, July 8, 1997)
controlling stockholders, irrespective of the
place of incorporation. Controlling The Supreme Court laid down the test in
stockholders mean those who hold more than determining the applicability of the doctrine
50% of the voting stock. of piercing the veil of corporate fiction, to
wit:
Separate juridical personality
1. Control, not mere majority or complete
As a general rule, a corporation will be control, but complete domination, not
deemed a separate legal entity until sufficient only of finances but of policy and business
reason to the contrary appears. But the rule practice in respect to the transaction
is not absolute. A corporation's separate and attacked so that the corporate entity as to
distinct legal personality may be disregarded this transaction had at the time no
and the veil of corporate fiction pierced when
P a g e | 83
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
separate mind, will or existence of its forms may be classified into two: (1)
own. preferred shares as to assets; and (2)
2. Such control must have been used by the preferred shares as to dividends. The former
defendant to commit fraud or wrong, to is a share which gives the holder thereof
perpetuate the violation of a statutory or preference in the distribution of the assets of
other positive legal duty, or dishonest the corporation in case of liquidation; the
and, unjust act in contravention of latter is a share the holder of which is
plaintiff’s legal rights; and, entitled to receive dividends on said share to
3. The aforesaid control and breach of duty the extent agreed upon before any dividends
must proximately cause the injury or at all are paid to the holders of common
unjust loss complained of. stock. There is no guaranty, however, that the
share will receive any dividends.
Concept Builders, Inc. v. NLRC, (G.R. No.
108734, May 29, 1996); "G" Holdings, Inc. Republic Planters Bank vs. Enrique A.
vs. NAMAWU, et al., (G.R. No. 160236, Agana, Sr., (G.R. No. 51765, March 3, 199)7
October 16, 2009)
The advantages accorded to the preferred
The term "capital" and other terms used to shares are undeniable, namely: the
describe the capital structure of a significant premium in the price being
corporation are of universal acceptance, and offered; the preference enjoyed in the
their usages have long been established in dividends as well as in the liquidation of
jurisprudence. Briefly, capital refers to the assets; and the voting rights still retained by
value of the property or assets of a preferred shares in major corporate actions.
corporation. All things considered, conversion to
preferred shares would best serve the
The term "capital" in Section 11, Article XII of interests and rights of the government or the
the 1987 Constitution refers only to shares of eventual owner of the CIIF SMC shares.
stock entitled to vote in the election of
directors, and thus in the present case only to COCOFED, et al. vs. Republic of the Phil.,
common shares, and not to the total (G.R. Nos. 177857-58, September 17, 2009)
outstanding capital stock (common and non-
voting preferred shares. Gamboa vs. Teves Redeemable shares are shares usually
(2011) preferred, which by their terms are
redeemable at a fixed date, or at the option of
Voting rights are exercised during regular or either issuing corporation, or the
special meetings of stockholders; regular stockholder, or both at a certain redemption
meetings to be held annually on a fixed date, price. A redemption by the corporation of its
while special meetings may be held at any stock is, in a sense, a repurchase of it for
time necessary or as provided in the by-laws, cancellation. The present Code allows
upon due notice. The Corporation Code redemption of shares even if there are no
provides for a whole range of matters which unrestricted retained earnings on the books
can be voted upon by stockholders, including of the corporation. This is a new provision
a limited set on which even non-voting which in effect qualifies the general rule that
stockholders are entitled to vote on. On any the corporation cannot purchase its own
of these matters which may be voted upon by shares except out of current retained
stockholders, the proxy device is generally earnings. However, while redeemable shares
available. may be redeemed regardless of the existence
of unrestricted retained earnings, this is
GSIS vs. Court of Appeals, et al., (G.R. Nos. subject to the condition that the corporation
183905 & 184275, April 16, 2009) has, after such redemption, assets in its
books to cover debts and liabilities inclusive
A preferred share of stock is one which of capital stock. Redemption, therefore, may
entitles the holder thereof to certain not be made where the corporation is
preferences over the holders of common insolvent or if such redemption will cause
stock. The preferences are designed to induce insolvency or inability of the corporation to
persons to subscribe for shares of a meet its debts as they mature.
corporation. Preferred shares take a
multiplicity of forms. The most common
P a g e | 84
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Republic Planters Bank vs. Enrique A. Parties organizing a corporation must choose
Agana, (Sr., G.R. No. 51765, March 3, 1997) a name at their peril; and the use of a name
similar to one adopted by another
Treasury shares - stocks issued and fully corporation, whether a business or a
paid for and re-acquired by the corporation nonprofit organization, if misleading or likely
either by purchase, donation, forfeiture or to injure in the exercise of its corporate
other means. Treasury shares are therefore functions, regardless of intent, may be
issued shares but being in the treasury they prevented by the corporation having a prior
do not have the status of outstanding shares. right, by a suit for injunction against the new
Consequently, although a treasury share, not corporation to prevent the use of the name.
having been retired by the corporation re-
acquiring it, may be re-issued or sold again, Ang Mga Kaanib Sa Iglesia Ng Dios Kay
such share, as long as it is held by the Kristo Hesus vs. Iglesia Ng Dios Kay Cristo
corporation as a treasury share, participates Jesus, (G.R. No. 137592, December 12, 2001)
neither in dividends, because dividends
cannot be declared by the corporation to The corporation, upon such change in its
itself, nor in the meetings of the corporation name, is in no sense a new corporation, nor
as voting stock, for otherwise equal the successor of the original corporation. It is
distribution of voting powers among the same corporation with a different name,
stockholders will be effectively lost and the and its character is in no respect changed. A
directors will be able to perpetuate their change in the corporate name does not make
control of the corporation, though it still a new corporation, and whether effected by
foregoing essential features of a treasury special act or under a general law, has no
stock are lacking in the questioned shares . effect on the identity of the corporation, or on
its property, rights, or liabilities. The
SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION, NEPTUNIA corporation continues, as before, responsible
CORPORATION LIMITED, ANDRES in its new name for all debts or other
SORIANO III AND ANSCOR-HAGEDORN liabilities which it had previously contracted
SECURITIES, INC., petitioners, vs. or incurred.
Sandiganbayan (G.R. Nos. 104637-38.
September 14, 2000.) Republic Planters Bank vs. Court of
Appeals, (G.R. No. 93073, December 21, 1992)
The charter of a corporation is a contract
between three parties: (a) It is a contract Organization and commencement of
between the state and the corporation to transaction of corporate business are but
which the charter is granted; (b) it is a conditions subsequent and not prerequisites
contract between the stockholders and the for acquisition of corporate personality. The
state and (c) it is also a contract between the adoption and filing of by-laws is also a
corporation and its stockholders. (Cook on condition subsequent. Under Section 19 of
Corporations, vol. 2, sec. 494 and cases cited.) the Corporation Code, a corporation
commences its corporate existence and
Government of the Phil. vs. Manila juridical personality and is deemed
Railroad Company, (G.R. No. 30646, January incorporated from the date the Securities
30, 1929) and Exchange Commission issues
certificate of incorporation under its
Sec. 17 - Grounds When Articles of official seal. This may be done even before
Incorporation or Amendment May Be the filing of the by-laws, which under Section
Rejected or Disapproved 46 of the Corporation Code, must be adopted
"within one month after receipt of official
The amendment of the articles of notice of the issuance of its certificate of
incorporation requires merely that (a) the incorporation."
amendment is not contrary to any provision
or requirement under the Corporation Code, Chung Ka Bio vs. Intermediate Appellate
and that (b) it is for a legitimate purpose. Court, (G.R. No. L-71837, July 26, 1988)
IEMELIF, et al. vs. Nathanael Lazaro, et al., The word "term" has acquired a definite
(G.R. No. 184088, July 6, 2010) meaning in jurisprudence. In several cases,
we have defined "term" as the time during
P a g e | 85
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
which the officer may claim to hold the office Hans Christian M. Señeres vs. COMELEC, et
as of right and fixes the interval after which al., (G.R. No. 178678, April 16, 2009)
the several incumbents shall succeed one
another. The term of office is not affected by The power and the responsibility to decide
the holdover. The term is fixed by statute and whether the corporation should enter into a
it does not change simply because the office contract that will bind the corporation are
may have become vacant, nor because the lodged in the board of directors, subject to
incumbent holds over in office beyond the the articles of incorporation, by-laws, or
end of the term due to the fact that a relevant provisions of law. However, just as a
successor has not been elected and has failed natural person may authorize another to do
to qualify. certain acts for and on his behalf, the board of
directors may validly delegate some of its
functions and powers to officers, committees
Term is distinguished from tenure in that an or agents. The authority of such individuals
officer's "tenure" represents the term during to bind the corporation is generally derived
which the incumbent actually holds office. from law, corporate by-laws or authorization
The tenure may be shorter (or, in case of from the board, either expressly or impliedly
holdover, longer) than the term for reasons by habit, custom or acquiescence in the
within or beyond the power of the general course of business.
incumbent.
Cebu Mactan Members Center, Inc. vs.
Valle Verde Country Club, Inc., et al. vs. Masahiro Tsukahara, (G.R. No. 159624, July
Victor Africa, (G.R. No. 151969, September 4, 17, 2009)
2009)
A corporation, like a natural person who may
The term of the members of the board of authorize another to do certain acts for and
directors shall be only for one year; their in his behalf, through its board of directors,
term expires one year after election to the may legally delegate some of its functions
office. The holdover period — that time from and powers to its officers, committees or
the lapse of one year from a member's agents appointed by it. In the absence of an
election to the Board and until his successor's authority from the board of directors, no
election and qualification — is not part of the person, not even the officers of the
director's original term of office, nor is it a corporation, can validly bind the corporation.
new term; the holdover period, however,
constitutes part of his tenure. Corollary, Luzviminda Visayan vs. NLRC, (G.R. No.
when an incumbent member of the board of 69999, April 30, 1991)
directors continues to serve in a holdover
capacity, it implies that the office has a fixed Under Section 23 of the Corporation Code of
term, which has expired, and the incumbent the Philippines, authority over corporate
is holding the succeeding term. funds is exercised by the Board of Directors
who, in the absence of an appropriate
Valle Verde Country Club, Inc., et al. vs. delegation of authority, are the only ones
Victor Africa, (G.R. No. 151969, September 4, who can act for and in behalf of the
2009) corporation.
it is clear that an individual corporate officer beyond the scope of his ordinary powers. It
cannot solely exercise any corporate power requires presentation of evidence of similar
pertaining to the corporation without act(s) executed either in its favor or in favor
authority from the board of directors. This of other parties. It is not the quantity of
has been our constant holding in cases similar acts which establishes apparent
instituted by a corporation. authority, but the vesting of a corporate
officer with the power to bind the
Cagayan Valley Drug Corp. vs. corporation.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (G.R.
No. 151413, February 13, 2008) People's Aircargo and Warehousing Co.
Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, (G.R. No. 117847,
Business Judgment Rule October 7, 1998); Inter-Asia Investments
Industries, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, (G.R.
the SEC and the courts are barred from No. 125778, June 10, 2003)
intruding into business judgments of
corporations, when the same are made in Whatever authority the officers or agents of a
good faith. The said rule precludes the corporation may have is derived from the
reversal of the decision of the PSE to deny board of directors or other governing body,
PALI's listing application, absent a showing of unless conferred by the charter of the
bad faith on the part of the PSE corporation. A corporate officer's power as
an agent of the corporation must therefore be
Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc. vs. Court sought from the statute, the charter, the by-
of Appeals, (G.R. No. 125469, October 27, laws, or in a delegation of authority to such
1997) officer, from the acts of the board of
directors, formally expressed or implied from
Doctrine of apparent authority a habit or custom of doing business.
corporation to protect the rights of the It is well settled in this jurisdiction that
minority stockholders thereof. where corporate directors are guilty of a
breach of trust — not of mere error of
Santiago Cua, Jr., et al. vs. Miguel Ocampo judgment or abuse of discretion — and
Tan, et al., (G.R. Nos. 181455-56 & 182008, intracorporate remedy is futile or useless, a
December 4, 2009) stockholder may institute a suit in behalf
of himself and other stockholders and for
Theory of Specific Capacity - the the benefit of the corporation, to bring
corporation cannot exercise powers except about a redress of the wrong inflicted
those expressly/impliedly given. directly upon the corporation and
indirectly upon the stockholders.
Theory of General Capacity - a corporation Santiago Cua, Jr., et al. vs. Miguel Ocampo
is said to hold such powers as are not Tan, et al., (G.R. Nos. 181455-56 & 182008,
prohibited/withheld from it by general law December 4, 2009)
Derivative Suit
The authority of these individuals to bind the directors or officers over properties that they
corporation is generally derived from law, do not own.
corporate bylaws or authorization from the
board, either expressly or impliedly by habit, This theory of delegated power of the board
custom or acquiescence in the general course of directors similarly explains why, under
of business. Section 29 of the Corporation Code, in cases
where the vacancy in the corporation's board
Violeta Tudtud Banate, et al. vs. Phil. of directors is caused not by the expiration of
Countryside Rural Bank (Liloan, Cebu), a member's term, the successor "so elected to
Inc., et al., (G.R. No. 163825, July 13, 2010) fill in a vacancy shall be elected only for the
unexpired term of his predecessor in office".
the distinction between "proxy solicitation" The law has authorized the remaining
and "proxy validation" cannot be dismissed members of the board to fill in a vacancy only
offhand. The right of a stockholder to vote by in specified instances, so as not to retard or
proxy is generally established by the impair the corporation's operations; yet, in
Corporation Code, but it is the Securities recognition of the stockholders' right to elect
Regulation Code which specifically regulates the members of the board, it limited the
the form and use of proxies, more period during which the successor shall serve
particularly the procedure of proxy only to the "unexpired term of his
solicitation, primarily through Section 20. predecessor in office".
GSIS vs. Court of Appeals, et al., (G.R. Nos. Valle Verde Country Club, Inc., et al. vs.
183905 & 184275, April 16, 2009) Victor Africa, (G.R. No. 151969, September 4,
2009)
Under Section 5 (c) of Presidential Decree No.
902-A, in relation to the SRC, the jurisdiction It also bears noting that the vacancy referred
of the regular trial courts with respect to to in Section 29 contemplates a vacancy
election-related controversies is specifically occurring within the director's term of office.
confined to "controversies in the election or When a vacancy is created by the expiration
appointment of directors, trustees, officers or of a term, logically, there is no more
managers of corporations, partnerships, or unexpired term to speak of. Hence, Section 29
associations". Evidently, the jurisdiction of declares that it shall be the corporation's
the regular courts over so-called election stockholders who shall possess the authority
contests or controversies under Section 5 (c) to fill in a vacancy caused by the expiration of
does not extend to every potential subject a member's term.
that may be voted on by shareholders, but
only to the election of directors or trustees, in Valle Verde Country Club, Inc., et al. vs.
which stockholders are authorized to Victor Africa, (G.R. No. 151969, September 4,
participate under Section 24 of the 2009)
Corporation Code.
Doctrine of corporate opportunity
GSIS vs. Court of Appeals, et al., (G.R. Nos.
183905 & 184275, April 16, 2009) Section 31 lays down the "doctrine of
corporate opportunity" and holds personally
The underlying policy of the Corporation liable corporate directors found guilty of
Code is that the business and affairs of a gross negligence or bad faith in directing the
corporation must be governed by a board of affairs of the corporation, which results in
directors whose members have stood for damage or injury to the corporation, its
election, and who have actually been elected stockholders or members, and other persons.
by the stockholders, on an annual basis. Only
in that way can the directors' continued Manuel Luis S. Sanchez vs. Republic of the
accountability to shareholders, and the Phil., (G.R. No. 172885, October 9, 2009)
legitimacy of their decisions that bind the
corporation's stockholders, be assured. The
shareholder vote is critical to the theory that The personal liability of corporate officers
legitimizes the exercise of power by the validly attaches only when (a) they assent to
a patently unlawful act of the corporation; or
P a g e | 89
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
(b) they are guilty of bad faith or gross The general rule is that obligations incurred
negligence in directing its affairs; or (c) they by the corporation, acting through its
incur conflict of interest, resulting in directors, officers, and employees, are its sole
damages to the corporation, its stockholders liabilities. However, solidary liability may be
or other persons. incurred, but only under the following
exceptional circumstances:
H.L. Carlos Construction, Inc. vs. Marina
Properties Corp., et al., (G.R. No. 147614, 1. When directors and trustees or, in
January 29, 2004) appropriate cases, the officers of a
corporation: (a) vote for or assent to
The general rule is that obligations incurred patently unlawful acts of the corporation;
by the corporation, acting through its (b) act in bad faith or with gross
directors, officers, and employees, are its sole negligence in directing the corporate
liabilities. However, solidary liability may be affairs; (c) are guilty of conflict of interest
incurred, but only under the following to the prejudice of the corporation, its
exceptional circumstances: (1) When stockholders or members, and other
directors and trustees or, in appropriate persons;
cases, the officers of a corporation: (a) vote 2. When a director or officer has consented
for or assent to patently unlawful acts of the to the issuance of watered stocks or who,
corporation; (b) act in bad faith or with gross having knowledge thereof, did not
negligence in directing the corporate affairs; forthwith file with the corporate
(c) are guilty of conflict of interest to the secretary his written objection thereto;
prejudice of the corporation, its stockholders 3. When a director, trustee or officer has
or members, and other persons; (2) When a contractually agreed or stipulated to hold
director or officer has consented to the himself personally and solidarily liable
issuance of watered stocks or who, having with the corporation; or
knowledge thereof, did not forthwith file with 4. When a director, trustee or officer is
the corporate secretary his written objection made, by specific provision of law,
thereto; (3) When a director, trustee or personally liable for his corporate action.
officer has contractually agreed or stipulated
to hold himself personally and solidarily Shrimp Specialists, Inc. vs. Fuji-
liable with the corporation; or (4) When a Triumph Agri-Industrial Corp., (G.R.
director, trustee or officer is made, by specific Nos. 168756 & 171476, December 7, 2009)
provision of law, personally liable for his
corporate action. The mere interlocking of directors and
officers does not warrant piercing the
Andrea Uy, et al. vs. Arlene Villanueva, et separate corporate personalities of the two
al., G.R. No. 157851, June 29, 2007; Shrimp corporations. Not only must there be a
Specialists, Inc. vs. Fuji-Triumph Agri- showing that there was majority or complete
Industrial Corp., (G.R. Nos. 168756 & 171476, control, but complete domination, not only of
December 7, 2009) finances but of policy and business practice
in respect to the transaction attacked, so that
Section 31 makes a director personally liable the corporate entity as to this transaction had
for corporate debts if he willfully and at the time no separate mind, will or
knowingly votes for or assents to patently existence of its own.
unlawful acts of the corporation. Section 31
also makes a director personally liable if he is "G" Holdings, Inc. vs. NAMAWU, et al., (G.R.
guilty of gross negligence or bad faith in No. 160236, October 16, 2009)
directing the affairs of the corporation. The
bad faith or wrongdoing of the director must To validly increase its authorized capital
be established clearly and convincingly. Bad stock, corporation must issue at least 25% of
faith is never presumed. such stock.
Seaoil Petroleum Corp. vs. Autocorp The corporation must issue at least twenty-
Group, et al., (G.R. No. 164326, October 17, five percent (25%) of the newly or
2008) contemporaneously authorized capital stock
in the course of complying with the
P a g e | 90
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
requirements of the Corporation Code for distribution of corporate assets. There can be
increasing its authorized capital stock. no distribution of assets among the
stockholders without first paying corporate
Nestle Philippines, Inc. vs. CA and SEC, creditors. Hence, any disposition of corporate
(G.R. No. 86738, November 13, 1991) funds to the prejudice of creditors is null and
void.
The grant of preemptive rights preserves
the proportionate shares of the original Boman Environmental Development
partners so as not to dilute their respective Corporation vs. Court of Appeals, (G.R. No.
interests with the issuance of the new shares. 77860, November 22, 1988)
Unlike the right of first refusal, a preemptive
right gives a partner a preferential right over TRUST FUND DOCTRINE
the newly issued shares only to the extent
that it retains its original proportionate share Is a "rule that the property of a corporation is
in the joint venture. a trust fund for the payment of creditors, but
such property can be called a trust fund 'only
Notice Requirement by way of analogy or metaphor.' As between
the corporation itself and its creditors it is a
To give the stockholders knowledge of the simple debtor, and as between its creditors
intended sale of shares of stock of the and stockholders its assets are in equity a
corporation, in order that they may exercise fund for the payment of its debts"
their preemptive right. The "Trust Fund" doctrine considers this
subscribed capital as a trust fund for the
While the Corporation Code allows the payment of the debts of the corporation, to
transfer of all or substantially all the which the creditors may look for satisfaction.
properties and assets of a corporation, the Until the liquidation of the corporation, no
transfer should not prejudice the creditors of part of the subscribed capital may be
the assignor. The only way the transfer can returned or released to the stockholder
proceed without prejudice to the creditors is (except in the redemption of redeemable
to hold the assignee liable for the obligations shares) without violating this principle. Thus,
of the assignor. The acquisition by the dividends must never impair the subscribed
assignee of all or substantially all of the capital; subscription commitments cannot be
assets of the assignor necessarily includes the condoned or remitted; nor can the
assumption of the assignor's liabilities, unless corporation buy its own shares using the
the creditors who did not consent to the subscribed capital as the consideration
transfer choose to rescind the transfer on the therefor.
ground of fraud. To allow an assignor to
transfer all its business, properties and assets Under the trust fund doctrine, a corporation
without the consent of its creditors and has no legal capacity to release an original
without requiring the assignee to assume the subscriber to its capital stock from the
assignor's obligations will defraud the obligation of paying for his shares, in
creditors. The assignment will place the whole or in part, without a valuable
assignor's assets beyond the reach of its consideration, or fraudulently, to the
creditors. prejudice of creditors. The creditor is
allowed to maintain an action upon any
Strategic Alliance Development Corp. vs. unpaid subscriptions and thereby steps into
Radstock Securities Limited, et al., (G.R. the shoes of the corporation for the
Nos. 178158 & 180428, December 4, 2009) satisfaction of its debt. To make out a prima
facie case in a suit against stockholders of an
The requirement of unrestricted retained insolvent corporation to compel them to
earnings to cover the shares is based on the contribute to the payment of its debts by
trust fund doctrine which means that the making good unpaid balances upon their
capital stock, property and other assets of a subscriptions, it is only necessary to establish
corporation are regarded as equity in trust that the stockholders have not in good faith
for the payment of corporate creditors. The paid the par value of the stocks of the
reason is that creditors of a corporation are corporation.
preferred over the stockholders in the
P a g e | 91
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
like the present, mandamus will lie to compel or consolidation involves fundamental
the officers of the corporation to transfer said changes in the corporation, as well as in the
stock in the books of the corporation." The rights of stockholders and creditors, there
corporation's obligation to register is must be an express provision of law
ministerial. authorizing them.
Rural Bank of Salinas, Inc. vs. Court of For a valid merger or consolidation, the
Appeals, (G.R. No. 96674, June 26, 1992); Eric approval by the Securities and Exchange
L. Lee vs. Henry J. Trocino, et al., (G.R. No. Commission (SEC) of the articles of merger or
164648, June 19, 2009) consolidation is required. These articles must
likewise be duly approved by a majority of
REGISTRATION IN BOOKS the respective stockholders of the constituent
corporation
The corporation did not keep books and
records. Perforce, no transfer was ever The Corporation Code does not mandate the
recorded, much less effected as to prejudice absorption of the employees of the non-
third parties. The transfer must be registered surviving corporation by the surviving
in the books of the corporation to affect third corporation in the case of a merger. The rule
persons. is that unless expressly assumed, labor
Concepcion Magsaysay-Labrador vs. CA contracts such as employment contracts and
and Adelaida Rodriguez-Magsaysay, (G.R. collective bargaining agreements are not
No. 58168, December 19, 1989) enforceable against a transferee of an
enterprise, labor contracts being in
RIGHT OF INSPECTION personam, thus binding only between the
parties. A labor contract merely creates an
stockholder may exercise his statutory right action in personam and does not create any
of inspection, the only express limitation real right which should be respected by third
being that (1) the right of inspection should parties. This conclusion draws its force from
be exercised at reasonable hours on business the right of an employer to select his
days; (2) the person demanding to examine employees and to decide when to engage
and copy excerpts from the corporation's them as protected under our Constitution,
records and minutes has not improperly used and the same can only be restricted by law
any information secured through any through the exercise of the police power.
previous examination of the records of such
corporation; and (3) the demand is made in BPI vs. BPI Employees Union-Davao
good faith or for a legitimate purpose. Chapter-Federation of Unions in BPI
Unibank, (G.R. No. 164301, August 10, 2010),
Rep. of the Phil. (PCGG) vs. citing Sundowner Development Corp. v.
Sandiganbayan, et al., (G.R. No. 88809, July Drilon, (G.R. No. 82341, December 6, 1989)
10, 1991); Victor Africa vs. PCGG, (G.R. No.
83831, January 9, 1992); Ma. Belen RIGHT OF APPRAISAL
Flordeliza C. Ang-Abaya, et al. vs. Eduardo
G. Ang, (G.R. No. 178511, December 4, 2008) [Appraisal right] means that a stockholder
who dissented and voted against the
MERGER AND CONSOLIDATION proposed corporate action, may choose to get
out of the corporation by demanding
Consolidation is the union of two or more payment of the fair market value of his
existing entities to form a new entity called shares. When a person invests in the stocks
the consolidated corporation. of a corporation, he subjects his investment
to all the risks of the business and cannot just
A merger, on the other hand, is a union pull out such investment should the business
whereby one or more existing corporations not come out as he expected. He will have to
are absorbed by another corporation that wait until the corporation is finally dissolved
survives and continues the combined before he can get back his investment, and
business. The merger, however, does not even then, only if sufficient assets are left
become effective upon the mere agreement of after paying all corporate creditors. His only
the constituent corporations. Since a merger way out before dissolution is to sell his
P a g e | 93
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
or against any corporation, its stockholders, 3. The aforesaid control and breach of
members, directors, trustees, or officers, nor duty must proximately cause the injury or
any liability incurred by any such unjust loss complained of.
corporation, stockholders, members,
directors, trustees, or officers, shall be In a dispute involving the corporation and its
removed or impaired either by the stockholders, how should the articles of
subsequent dissolution of said corporation."
incorporation and by-laws be appreciated and
Even if no trustee is appointed or designated
during the three-year period of the construed?
liquidation of the corporation, the Court has
In the case of Forest Hills Golf and Country Club,
held that the board of directors may be
permitted to complete the corporate Inc., vs. Gardpro (GR no.164686, October 22,
liquidation by continuing as "trustees" by 2014), the Supreme Court had emphasized that
legal implication. the Articles of Incorporation defines the
contractual relationship between the
corporation with its stockholders, the
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES AND QUESTIONS FOR corporation and the state, and the stockholders
CORPORATION LAW
and the state. Hence, they are binding not just on
ON CORPORATION LAW the corporation but also on the stockholders
themselves. On the other hand, the by-laws are
X is president of AB, a family owned considered to be the “private statutes” by which
corporation which defrauded Y when they the corporation is to be governed. In construing
failed to deliver a motor vehicle which was and applying the provisions of the articles of
admittedly previously sold and delivered incorporation and the by-laws of the corporation
already to another person instead. X and Y are therefore, the plain meaning or literal meaning
cousins and it was thru the former’s rule embodied in Article 1370 of the Civil Code
representation that the latter decided to buy shall apply.
the motor vehicle from AB. X now raises the
defense that he is not a party to the contract May the directors of a corporation be
and there is no ground to pierce the veil of compelled to participate in arbitration
corporate fiction. proceedings, when they were not parties to the
contract that contained the arbitration
There is ground to pierce the veil of corporate clause?
fiction.
In the case of Lanuza Jr., vs. BF Corporation (GR
The test in determining the applicability no.174938, October 1, 2014), the High Court
of the doctrine of piercing the veil of stated that, while arbitration promotes the
corporate fiction is as follows: parties’ autonomy in resolving their disputes, it
also recognized the decision made in Heirs of
1. Control, not mere majority or complete
Augusto Salas Jr., vs. Laperal Realty Corporation
stock control, but complete domination, not
(378 Phil.Reports 369) that, an arbitration clause
only of finances but of policy and business
shall not apply to persons who were neither
practice in respect to the transaction
parties to the contract nor assignees of previous
attacked so that the corporate entity as to
parties.
this transaction had at the time no separate
mind, will or existence of its own; In Lanuza, the Court therefore ruled that, “As a
general rule, a corporation’s representative who
2. Such control must have been used by
did not personally bind himself or herself to an
the defendant to commit fraud or wrong, to
arbitration agreement cannot be forced to
perpetuate the violation of a statutory or
participate in arbitration proceedings made
other positive legal duty, or dishonest and
pursuant to an agreement entered into by the
unjust acts in contravention of plaintiffs’
corporation. He or she is not a party to that
legal rights; and
agreement.” This rule is consistent as well with
P a g e | 95
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
the separate and juridical personality of juridical Neither should the level of paid-up capital of
persons vis-à-vis, their directors, officers, Kukan, Inc. upon its incorporation be viewed as a
stockholders and agents. badge of fraud, for it is in compliance with Sec.
13 of the Corporation Code, which only requires
The ruling in Lanuza however should be
a minimum paid-up capital of PhP 5,000.
considered as an application of the general rule,
except of course when there are ground to pierce May minority stockholders file their derivative
the veil of corporate fiction. suit against the corporation’s board of
Can the doctrine of piercing the veil of directors for acts of mismanagement?
corporate fiction be used to establish or In Ching vs. Subic Bay Golf and Country Club,
acquire jurisdiction over a corporation? Inc., (GR no.174353, September 10, 2014), the
High Court ruled that a stockholders’ right to
No. This is so because the doctrine of piercing
institute a derivative suit is not based on any
the veil of corporate fiction comes to play
express provision of the Corporation Code or
only during the trial of the case after the court
even the Securities Regulation Code, but is
has already acquired jurisdiction over the
impliedly recognized when the said laws make
corporation. Hence, before this doctrine can be
corporate directors or officers liable for damages
applied, based on the evidence presented, it is
suffered by the corporation and its stockholders
imperative that the court must first have
for violation of their fiduciary duties.
jurisdiction over the corporation.
The following are the elements of a derivative
The implication of the above comment is
suit, which must all concur:
twofold: (1) the court must first acquire
jurisdiction over the corporation or corporations 1. He was a stockholder or a member at the
time the acts or transactions subject of
involved before its or their separate
the action occurred and at the time the
personalities are disregarded; and (2) the action was filed;
doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate entity 2. He exerted all reasonable efforts and
can only be raised during a full-blown trial over a alleges the same with particularity in the
complaint, to exhaust all remedies
cause of action duly commenced involving available under the articles of
parties duly brought under the authority of the incorporation, by-laws, laws or rules
court by way of service of summons or what governing the corporation or partnership
to obtain the relief he desires;
passes as such service. (Kukan International vs.
3. No appraisal rights are available for the
J.Amor Reyes [2010]) act or acts complained of;
4. The suit is not a nuisance or harassment
Is the paid-up capital of a corporation a
suit.
reflection of its financial capacity to meet its In corporate rehabilitation proceedings,
recurrent and long-term obligations? whose rights shall prevail over the other?
No. Paid-up capital is merely seed money to start This was the issue that the Supreme Court had to
a corporation or a business entity. Paid-up confront with in the case of Aquino vs. Pacific
capitalization of PhP 5,000 is not and should not Plans, Inc., (GR no.193108, December 10, 2014)
be taken as a reflection of the firm’s capacity to
involving the plan holders and other creditors of
meet its recurrent and long-term obligations. It
must be borne in mind that the equity portion pre-need company Pacific Plans.
cannot be equated to the viability of a business
In this case, the Supreme Court had the
concern, for the best test is the working capital
which consists of the liquid assets of a given opportunity to discuss the “Cram Down”5 power
business relating to the nature of the business
concern.
5 See section 64 of the Financial Rehabilitation and
Insolvency Law (FRIA): Section 64. Creditor
Approval of Rehabilitation Plan. – The rehabilitation
P a g e | 96
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
of the rehabilitation court. This prerogative no.187581, October 2014) ruled as well that the
given to the Rehabilitation Court maintains that purpose of such proceedings is two-fold – (1.) To
the court may approve a rehabilitation plan over efficiently and equitably distribute the assets of
the objection of the creditors if, in its judgment, the insolvent debtor to its creditors; and (2.) To
the rehabilitation of the debtors is feasible and provide the debtor with a fresh start.
the opposition of creditors is manifestly
The “material financial commitment” rule was
unreasonable. The High Court noted that:
also discussed in the same aforementioned case.
“While the voice and participation of the This rule becomes significant in determining the
creditors is crucial in the determination of earnestness and good faith of the financially
the viability of the rehabilitation plan, as distressed corporation in financing its proposed
they stand to benefit or suffer in the rehabilitation plan. This material financial
implementation thereof, the interests of all commitment may include the readiness,
stakeholders is the ultimate and prime willingness and ability of the corporation to
consideration.” contribute funds or property to guarantee the
operation of the corporation during the period of
In relation to corporate rehabilitation
rehabilitation.
proceedings, the Supreme Court in the case of
Philippine Bank of Communications vs. Basic Will the fact that a person acting as President,
Polyprinters and Packaging Corporation (GR Chairman and Treasurer of the corporation
justify already the piercing of the veil of
receiver shall notify the creditors and stakeholders corporate fiction based on the alter-ego
that the Plan is ready for their examination. Within
twenty (2Q) days from the said notification, the theory?
rehabilitation receiver shall convene the creditors,
either as a whole or per class, for purposes of voting No. In the case of WPM International Trading vs.
on the approval of the Plan. The Plan shall be Labayen (GR no.182770, September 17, 2014)
deemed rejected unless approved by all classes of ruled that, “The control necessary to invoke the
creditors w hose rights are adversely modified or
affected by the Plan. For purposes of this section, instrumentality or alter ego rule is not majority
the Plan is deemed to have been approved by a or even complete stock control but such
class of creditors if members of the said class domination of finances, policies and practices
holding more than fifty percent (50%) of the total
claims of the said class vote in favor of the Plan. The that the controlled corporation has, so to speak,
votes of the creditors shall be based solely on the no separate mind, will or existence of its own,
amount of their respective claims based on the and is but a conduit for its principal. The control
registry of claims submitted by the rehabilitation
receiver pursuant to Section 44 hereof. must be shown to have been exercised at the
time the acts complained of took place.
Notwithstanding the rejection of the Rehabilitation Moreover, the control and breach of duty must
Plan, the court may confirm the Rehabilitation Plan
proximately cause the injury or unjust loss for
if all of the following circumstances are present:
which the complaint is made.”
(a)The Rehabilitation Plan complies with the
requirements specified in this Act. May the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) issue a cease and desist order against a
(b) The rehabilitation receiver recommends the corporation engaging in the sale of pre-need
confirmation of the Rehabilitation Plan;
plans without proper registration?
(c) The shareholders, owners or partners of the
juridical debtor lose at least their controlling
In Primamanila Plans vs. SEC (GR no.193791,
interest as a result of the Rehabilitation Plan; and August 6, 2014), the Supreme Court upheld the
authority of the SEC to issue a cease and desist
(d) The Rehabilitation Plan would likely provide order. This may be done motu proprio, it being
the objecting class of creditors with
compensation which has a net present value unnecessary that it results from a verified
greater than that which they would have complaint from an aggrieved party. A prior
received if the debtor were under liquidation. hearing is also not required whenever the
Commission finds it appropriate to issue a cease
P a g e | 97
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
and desist order that aims to curtail fraud or In such actions, the corporation is the real party-in-
grave or irreparable injury to investors. interest while the suing stockholder, on behalf of
the corporation, is only a nominal party.
May a Hospital Corporation be liable for
negligent acts committed by its Doctor- What is the rule on venue in derivative suits?
Consultants, who are not under their employ?
Derivative suits to be instituted shall be
Yes. Hospitals may be found liable for the commenced and tried in the Regional Trial Court
negligent acts committed by its doctor- which has jurisdiction over the principal office of
consultants, even if there is no employer- the corporation, partnership, or association
employee relationship between them. concerned. Where the principal office of the
corporation, partnership or association is
As a rule, hospitals are not liable for the
registered in the Securities and Exchange
negligence of its independent contractors.
Commission as Metro Manila, the action must be
However, it may be found liable if the physician
filed in the city or municipality where the head
or independent contractor acts as an ostensible
office is located.
agent of the hospital, under the doctrine of
apparent authority, based on proof of the May the doctrine of piercing the veil of
existence of two important factors – (a.) The corporate fiction apply to a corporation not
hospital’s manifestations, and (b.) The patient’s impleaded in the suit?
reliance.
No. A corporation not impleaded in a suit cannot
Is every action filed on behalf of a corporation be subject to the court’s process of piercing the
a derivative suit? veil of its corporate fiction. In that situation, the
court has not acquired jurisdiction over the
No. Not every suit filed on behalf of the
corporation and, hence, any proceedings taken
corporation is a derivative suit. For a derivative
against that corporation and its property would
suit to prosper, the minority stockholder suing
infringe on its right to due process. The doctrine
for and on behalf of the corporation must allege
of piercing the veil of corporate fiction comes to
in his complaint that he is suing on a derivative
play only during the trial of the case after the
cause of action on behalf of the corporation and
court has already acquired jurisdiction over the
all other stockholders similarly situated who
corporation. Before this doctrine can be applied,
may wish to join him in the suit. the court must first have jurisdiction over the
The following are the requisites for a derivative corporation.
suit to prosper: What is the meaning of capital in a
a) The party bringing suit should be a corporation?
shareholder as of the time of the act or The term capital and other terms used to
transaction complained of, the number of describe the capital structure of a corporation
his shares not being material; are of universal acceptance and their usages
have long been established in
b) He has tried to exhaust intra-corporate
jurisprudence. Briefly, capital refers to the value
remedies, i.e., has made a demand on the
of the property or assets of a
board of directors for the appropriate relief
corporation. The capital subscribed is the total
but the latter has failed or refused to heed
amount of the capital that persons
his plea; and
(subscribers or shareholders) have agreed to
c) The cause of action actually devolves on take and pay for, which need not necessarily by,
the corporation, the wrongdoing or harm and can be more than, the par value of the
having been, or being caused to the shares.
corporation and not to the particular
In fine, it is the amount that the corporation
stockholder bringing the suit.
receives, inclusive of the premiums if any, in
P a g e | 98
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
consideration of the original issuance of the back a portion or its entire unrestricted retained
shares. In the case of stock dividends, it is the earnings either to its working capital or for
amount that the corporation transfers from capital asset acquisition or investments. It is
its surplus profit account to its capital simplistic to say that the corporation did not
account. It is the same amount that can be receive any actual payment for these. When the
loosely termed as the trust fund of the dividend is distributed, it ceases to be a property
corporation. The Trust Fund doctrine considers of the corporation as the entire or portion of its
this subscribed capital as a trust fund for the unrestricted retained earnings is distributed pro
payment of the debts of the corporation, to rata to corporate shareholders.
which the creditors may look for
satisfaction. Until the liquidation of the WHAT IS THE CONTROVERSY TEST IN
corporation, no part of the subscribed capital INTRACORPORATE DISPUTES?
may be returned or released to the stockholder
Under the nature of the controversy test, the
(except in the redemption of redeemable shares) Incidents of that relationship must also be
without violating this principle. Thus, dividends considered for the purpose of ascertaining
must never impair the subscribed capital; whether the controversy itself is intra -
subscription commitments cannot be condoned corporate. The controversy must not only be
or remitted; nor can the corporation buy its own rooted in the existence of an intra corporate
shares using the subscribed capital as the relationship but must as well pertain to the
enforcement of the parties’ correlative rights and
considerations therefor.
obligations under the Corporation Code and the
How do you value the amount of dividends to internal and intra – corporate regulatory rules of
the corporation. If the relationship and its
be declared?
incidents are merely incidental to the
Dividends, regardless of the form these are controversy or if there will still be conflict even if
the relationship does not exist, then no intra
declared, that is, cash, property or stocks, are
corporate controversy exists.
valued at the amount of the declared dividend
taken from the unrestricted retained earnings of WHAT IS THE ALTER-EGO THEORY?
a corporation. Thus, the value of the declaration
in the case of a stock dividend is the actual value Case law lays down a three-pronged test to
of the original issuance of said stocks. determine the application of the alter ego theory,
which is also known as the instrumentality
theory, namely:
The Supreme Court has also said that in the case (A) Control, not mere majority or complete
of stock dividends, it is the amount that the stock control, but complete domination, not
corporation transfers from its surplus profit only of finances but of policy and business
practice in respect to the transaction
account to its capital account or it is the amount
attacked so that the corporate entity as to
that the corporation receives in consideration of this transaction had at the time no separate
the original issuance of the shares. It is the mind, will or existence of its own
distribution of current or accumulated earnings (B) Such control must have been used by the
to the shareholders of a corporation pro rata defendant to commit fraud or wrong, to
based on the number of shares owned. Such perpetuate the violation of a statutory or
distribution in whatever form is valued at the other positive legal duty, or dishonest and
unjust act in contravention of plaintiff’s
declared amount or monetary equivalent.
legal right; and
Is there consideration involved in the issuance (C) The aforesaid control and breach of duty
must have proximately caused the injury or
of stock dividends?
unjust loss complained of.
Yes. The declaration of stock dividends is
equivalent to a forced purchase of stocks. By
declaring stock dividends, a corporation ploughs
P a g e | 99
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
WHAT IS THE THREE-PRONGED TEST TO The third prong is the "harm" test. This test
DETERMINE THE APPLICATION OF THE ALTER requires the plaintiff to show that the
EGO THEORY? defendant’s control, exerted in a fraudulent,
illegal or otherwise unfair manner toward it,
In this connection, case law lays down a three-
caused the harm suffered. A causal connection
pronged test to determine the application of the
between the fraudulent conduct committed
alter ego theory, which is also known as the
through the instrumentality of the subsidiary
instrumentality theory, namely:
and the injury suffered or the damage incurred
1. Control, not mere majority or complete by the plaintiff should be established. The
stock control, but complete domination, not plaintiff must prove that, unless the corporate
only of finances but of policy and business veil is pierced, it will have been treated unjustly
practice in respect to the transaction by the defendant’s exercise of control and
attacked so that the corporate entity as to improper use of the corporate form and, thereby,
this transaction had at the time no separate suffer damages.
mind, will or existence of its own;
What is the role of the Corporate Secretary in a
2. Such control must have been used by the corporation?
defendant to commit fraud or wrong, to
perpetuate the violation of a statutory or It is the signature of the corporate secretary, as
other positive legal duty, or dishonest and the one who is tasked to prepare and record the
minutes, that gives the minutes of the meeting
unjust act in contravention of plaintiff’s probative value and credibility.
legal right; and;
The non-signing by the majority of the members
3. The aforesaid control and breach of duty of Board of Trustees of the said minutes does not
must have proximately caused the injury or necessarily mean that the supposed resolution
unjust loss complained of. was not approved by the board. The signing of
the minutes by all the members of the board is
The first prong is the "instrumentality" or not required. There is no provision in the
"control" test. This test requires that the Corporation Code of the Philippines that
subsidiary be completely under the control and requires that the minutes of the meeting should
domination of the parent. It inquires whether a be signed by all the members of the board.
subsidiary corporation is so organized and
The proper custodian of the books, minutes and
controlled and its affairs are so conducted as to
official records of a corporation is usually the
make it a mere instrumentality or agent of the corporate secretary. Being the custodian of
parent corporation such that its separate corporate records, the corporate secretary has
existence as a distinct corporate entity will be the duty to record and prepare the minutes of
ignored. In addition, the control must be shown the meeting. The signature of the corporate
to have been exercised at the time the acts secretary gives the minutes of the meeting
complained of took place. probative value and credibility.
The second prong is the "fraud" test. This test Thus, without the certification of the corporate
requires that the parent corporation’s conduct in secretary, it is incumbent upon the other
directors or stockholders as the case may be, to
using the subsidiary corporation be unjust,
submit proof that the minutes of the meeting is
fraudulent or wrongful. It examines the accurate and reflective of what transpired during
relationship of the plaintiff to the corporation. It the meeting. (LOPEZ REALTY, INC. AND
recognizes that piercing is appropriate only if the ASUNCION LOPEZ-GONZALES vs. SPOUSES
parent corporation uses the subsidiary in a way REYNALDO TANJANGCO AND MARIA LUISA
that harms the plaintiff creditor. As such, it ARGUELLES-TANJANGCO, G.R. No. 154291,
November 12, 2014)
requires a showing of "an element of injustice or
fundamental unfairness."
P a g e | 100
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Can the refusal to inspect corporate books be stockholder or member who is unknown or
the basis of a criminal complaint? cannot be found shall be escheated to the city
or municipality where such assets are
Yes. All the rights guaranteed to corporators
located.
under Section 74 of the Corporation Code are
mandatory for the corporation to respect. All Will a change in corporate name result in the
such rights are just the same underpinned by the
creation of a new corporation?
same policy consideration of keeping public
confidence in the corporate vehicle thru an No. A change in the corporate name does not
assurance of transparency in the corporation's
make a new corporation, whether effected by a
operations. (ADERITO Z. YUJUICO AND
BONIFACIO C. SUMBILLA vs. CEZAR T. special act or under a general law. It has no
QUIAMBAO AND ERIC C. PILAPIL, G.R. No. effect on the identity of the corporation, or on
180416, June 02, 2014) its property, rights, or liabilities because the
corporation upon such change in its name, is in
MAY A DISSOLVED CORPORATION STILL no sense a new corporation, nor the successor
CONTINUE TO FILE CASES? of the original corporation.
Yes. A dissolved corporation may still continue to The mere change in the corporate name is not
file cases within the prescribed three-year period considered under the law as the creation of a
under Section 122 of the Corporation Code. new corporation; hence, the renamed
corporation remains liable for the illegal
SEC. 122. Corporate liquidation. Every
dismissal of its employee separated under that
corporation whose charter expires by its own
guise. Verily, the amendments of the articles of
limitation or is annulled by forfeiture or
incorporation of Zeta to change the corporate
otherwise, or whose corporate existence for
name to Zuellig Freight and Cargo Systems, Inc.,
other purposes is terminated in any other
did not produce the dissolution of the former as
manner, shall nevertheless be continued as a
a corporation. (Zuellig Freight and Cargo
body corporate for three (3) years after the
Systems. National Labor Relations Commission,
time when it would have been so dissolved,
et al., G.R. No. 157900, July 22, 2013)
for the purpose of prosecuting and defending
suits by or against it and enabling it to settle What are the rules on corporate merger?
and close its affairs, to dispose of and convey
its property and to distribute its assets, but Merger is a re-organization of two or more
not for the purpose of continuing the business corporations that results in their consolidating
for which it was established. into a single corporation, which is one of the
constituent corporations, one disappearing or
At any time during said three (3) years, said dissolving and the other surviving. To put it
corporation is authorized and empowered to another way, merger is the absorption of one or
convey all of its property to trustees for the more corporations by another existing
corporation, which retains its identity and takes
benefit of stockholders, members, creditors,
over the rights, privileges, franchises, properties,
and other persons in interest. From and after claims, liabilities and obligations of the absorbed
any such conveyance by the corporation of its corporation(s). The absorbing corporation
property in trust for the benefit of its continues its existence while the life or lives of
stockholders, members, creditors and others the other corporation(s) is or are terminated.
in interest, all interest which the corporation
had in the property terminates, the legal The Corporation Code requires the following
steps for merger or consolidation:
interest vests in the trustees, and the
beneficial interest in the stockholders, (a.) The board of each corporation draws up
members, creditors or other persons in a plan of merger or consolidation. Such plan
interest. must include any amendment, if necessary,
to the articles of incorporation of the
Upon winding up of the corporate affairs, any surviving corporation, or in case of
asset distributable to any creditor or consolidation, all the statements required in
P a g e | 101
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
and permitting them to reorganize their affairs. Article 1732 makes no distinction between one
The purpose of rehabilitation proceedings is to whose principal business activity is the carrying
enable the company to gain a new lease on life of persons or goods or both, and one who does
and thereby allow creditors to be paid their such carrying only as an ancillary activity (in
claims from its earnings. local idiom, as "a sideline"). Article 1732 also
carefully avoids making any distinction between
Premiere Development Bank vs. Alfredo C.
a person or enterprise offering transportation
Flores, et al., (G.R. No. 175339, December 16,
2008) service on a regular or scheduled basis and one
offering such service on an occasional, episodic
or unscheduled basis. Neither does Article 1732
TRANSPORTATION LAW distinguish between a carrier offering its
services to the "general public," i.e., the general
Laws Covered community or population, and one who offers
services or solicits business only from a narrow
1. Civil Code segment of the general population
Arts. 1732-1734 (General
Provisions) First Phil. Industrial Corp. vs. Court of Appeals,
Arts.1736-1753 (Vigilance over G.R. No. 125948, December 29, 1998
Goods)
Arts.1754-1766 (Safety of National Steel Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
Passengers) 112287 & 112350, December 12, 1997
2. Warsaw Convention
3. Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA) Engracio Fabre, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
111127, July 26, 1996
Civil Code Provisions It is not necessary that the carrier be issued a
certificate of public convenience, and this public
Art. 1732 - Common carriers
character is not altered by the fact that the
Vector Shipping Corp., et al. vs. Adelfo B. Macasa, carriage of the goods in question was periodic,
et al., G.R. No. 160219, July 21, 2008 occasional, episodic or unscheduled
Alejandro Arada vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. Asia Lighterage and Shipping, Inc. vs. Court of
98243, July 1, 1992 Appeals, G.R. No. 147246, August 19, 2003
Pedro de Guzman vs. CA and Ernesto Cendaña, G.R. Philippine American General Insurance Company
No. L-47822, December 22, 1988 vs. PKS Shipping Company, G.R. No. 149038, April
9, 2003
Philippine Air Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. L-46558, July 31, 1981 FGU Insurance Corp. vs. G.P. Sarmiento Trucking
Corp., G.R. No. 141910. August 6, 2002
The test to determine a common carrier is
"whether the given undertaking is a part of the Virgines Calvo vs. UCPB General Insurance Co.,
business engaged in by the carrier which he has G.R. No. 148496. March 19, 2002
held out to the general public as his occupation
Loadstar Shipping Co. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
rather than the quantity or extent of the business
No. 131621. September 28, 1999
transacted." . . .
A freight forwarder's liability is limited to
Planters Products, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
damages arising from its own negligence,
No. 101503, September 15, 1993
including negligence in choosing the carrier;
Estrellita M. Bascos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. however, where the forwarder contracts to
101089, April 7, 1993 deliver goods to their destination instead of
merely arranging for their transportation, it
becomes liable as a common carrier for loss or
P a g e | 103
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
damage to goods. A freight forwarder assumes A common carrier and, as such, is obliged to
the responsibility of a carrier, which actually exercise extraordinary diligence in transporting
executes the transport, even though the its passengers safely.
forwarder does not carry the merchandise itself.
Victory Liner, Inc. vs. Pablo Race, G.R. No. 164820,
Unsworth Transport International (Phils.), Inc. vs. December 8, 2008
Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 166250, July 26,
A common carrier, from the nature of its
2010
business and for reasons of public policy, is
Art. 1733 - Common carriers are bound to bound to observe extraordinary diligence for the
observe extraordinary diligence safety of the passengers it transports.
Virgines Calvo vs. UCPB General Insurance Co., Armando G. Yrasuegui vs. Philippine Airlines, Inc.,
G.R. No. 148496. March 19, 2002 G.R. No. 168081, October 17, 2008
Phil-Am General Insurance Co., Inc. vs. Court of A common carrier is bound by law to exercise
Appeals, G.R. No. 116940, June 11, 1997 extraordinary diligence and utmost care in
ensuring for the safety and welfare of its
Trans-Asia Shipping Lines vs. Court of Appeals,
passengers with due regard for all the
G.R. No. 118126, March 4, 1996
circumstances.
Planters Products, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
Philippine Airlines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, et al.,
No. 101503, September 15, 1993
G.R. No. 123238, September 22, 2008
American Home Assurance, Co. vs. Court of
Mere proof of delivery of the goods in good order
Appeals, G.R. No. 94149, May 5, 1992 to a common carrier and of their arrival in bad
Heirs of Amparo De Los Santos vs. Court of order at their destination constitutes a prima
Appeals, G.R. No. 51165, June 21, 1990 facie case of fault or negligence against the
carrier. If no adequate explanation is given as to
Philippine Air Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. how the deterioration, loss, or destruction of the
No. L-46558, July 31, 1981 goods happened, the transporter shall be held
responsible.
Common carriers are bound to observe
extraordinary diligence over the goods they Unsworth Transport International (Phils.), Inc.
transport. vs. Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 166250, July
26, 2010
We need only to stress that from the nature of
their business and for reasons of public policy, Art. 1734 - When common carriers are not
common carriers are bound to observe responsible for loss, destruction, or deterioration
extraordinary diligence over the goods they of goods
transport according to all the circumstances of
each case. In the event of loss, destruction or Iron Bulk Shipping Phil., Co., Ltd. vs. Remington
deterioration of the insured goods, common Industrial Sales Corp., G.R. No. 136960, December
carriers are responsible, unless they can prove 8, 2003
that the loss, destruction or deterioration was
DSR-Senator Lines vs. Federal Phoenix Assurance
brought about by the causes specified in Article
Co., Inc., G.R. No. 135377, October 7, 2003
1734 of the Civil Code. In all other cases,
common carriers are presumed to have been at Asia Lighterage and Shipping, Inc. vs. Court of
fault or to have acted negligently, unless they Appeals, G.R. No. 147246, August 19, 2003
prove that they observed extraordinary
Phil. American General Insurance vs. MGG Marine
diligence.
Services, G.R. No. 135645, March 8, 2002
Aboitiz Shipping Corp. vs. New India Assurance
Co., Ltd., G.R. No. 156978, August 24, 2007
P a g e | 104
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, basis the figures written on the Berth Term Grain
G.R. No. 97412, July 12, 1994 Bill of Lading... Consequently, the respondent
must still prove the actual weight of the subject
Planters Products, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
shipment at the time it was loaded at the port of
No. 101503, September 15, 1993 origin so that a conclusion may be made as to
American Home Assurance, Co. vs. Court of whether there was indeed a shortage for which
Appeals, G.R. No. 94149, May 5, 1992 petitioner must be liable. . . The respondent
having failed to present evidence to prove the
Though it is true that common carriers are actual weight of the subject shipment when it
presumed to have been at fault or to have acted was loaded onto the M/V "Tern," its cause of
negligently if the goods transported by them are action must then fail because it cannot prove the
lost, destroyed, or deteriorated, and that the shortage that it was alleging. Indeed, if the
common carrier must prove that it exercised claimant cannot definitively establish the weight
extraordinary diligence in order to overcome the of the subject shipment at the point of origin, the
presumption, the plaintiff must still, before the fact of shortage or loss cannot be ascertained.
burden is shifted to the defendant, prove that the The claimant then has no basis for claiming
subject shipment suffered actual shortage. This damages resulting from an alleged shortage.
can only be done if the weight of the shipment at
the port of origin and its subsequent weight at Asian Terminals, Inc. vs. Simon Enterprises, Inc.,
the port of arrival have been proven by a G.R. No. 177116, February 27, 2013 citing
preponderance of evidence, and it can be seen Wallem Philippines Shipping, Inc. v. Prudential
that the former weight is considerably greater Guarantee & Assurance, Inc., 445 Phil. 136, 153
than the latter weight, taking into consideration (2003)
the exceptions provided in Article 1734 of the
Art. 1735 - When common carriers are
Civil Code. presumed to have been at fault or to have acted
Asian Terminals, Inc. vs. Simon Enterprises, Inc., negligently
G.R. No. 177116, February 27, 2013 Presumption of Fault or Negligence by Common
The Berth Term Grain Bill of Lading states that Carriers
the subject shipment was carried with the
A business intended to serve the travelling
qualification "Shipper's weight, quantity and
public primarily, a contract of carriage is imbued
quality unknown," meaning that it was
with public interest. The law governing common
transported with the carrier having been
carriers consequently imposes an exacting
oblivious of the weight, quantity, and quality of
standard. Article 1735 of the Civil Code provides
the cargo. This interpretation of the quoted
that in case of lost or damaged goods, common
qualification is supported by Wallem Philippines
carriers are presumed to have been at fault or to
Shipping, Inc. v. Prudential Guarantee &
have acted negligently, unless they prove that
Assurance, Inc., a case involving an analogous
they observed extraordinary diligence as
stipulation in a bill of lading, wherein the
required by Article 1733. Thus, in an action
Supreme Court held that:
based on a breach of contract of carriage, the
Indeed, as the bill of lading indicated that the aggrieved party does not have to prove that the
contract of carriage was under a "said to weigh" common carrier was at fault or was negligent. All
clause, the shipper is solely responsible for the that he has to prove is the existence of the
loading while the carrier is oblivious of the contract and the fact of its non-performance by
contents of the shipment. the carrier.
The fact that the cargo was shipped with the Air France vs. Bonifacio H. Gillego, G.R. No.
arrangement "Shipper's weight, quantity and 165266, December 15, 2010
quality unknown," indeed means that the weight
of the cargo could not be determined using as
P a g e | 105
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Aboitiz Shipping Corp. vs. Insurance Company of Alejandro Arada vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
North America, G.R. No. 168402, August 6, 2008 98243, July 1, 1992
Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Intermediate
G.R. No. 97412, July 12, 1994 Appellate Court, G.R. No. L-69044. May 29, 1987
Home Insurance Corp. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. Art. 1742 - Common carrier must exercise due
No. 109293, August 18, 1993 diligence to forestall or lessen loss
Extraordinary diligence must include Iron Bulk Shipping Phil., Co., Ltd. vs. Remington
safeguarding the shipment from damage coming Industrial Sales Corp., G.R. No. 136960,
from natural elements such as rainfall. December 8, 2003
Aboitiz Shipping Corp. vs. Insurance Co. of North Art. 1744 - Stipulation limiting liability of
America, G.R. No. 168402, August 6, 2008 common carrier to degree less than
extraordinary diligence
Art. 1736 - Extraordinary responsibility of
common carriers Samar Mining Co., Inc. vs. Nordeutscher Lloyd, G.R.
No. L-28673. October 23, 1984
Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 80936, October 17, 1990 Amparo Servando vs. Phil. Steam Navigation Co.,
G.R. Nos. L-36481-2. October 23, 1982
Explicit is the rule under Article 1736 of the Civil
Code that the extraordinary responsibility of the It is to be noted that the Civil Code does not limit
common carrier begins from the time the goods the liability of the common carrier to a fixed
are delivered to the carrier. This responsibility amount per package. In all matters not regulated
remains in full force and effect even when they by the Civil Code, the rights and obligations of
are temporarily unloaded or stored in transit common carriers are governed by the Code of
unless the shipper or owner exercises the right Commerce and special laws. Thus, the COGSA
of stoppage in transit and terminates only after supplements the Civil Code by establishing a
the lapse of a reasonable time for the acceptance provision limiting the carrier's liability in the
of the goods by the consignee or such other absence of a shipper's declaration of a higher
person entitled to receive them. And, there is value in the bill of lading.
delivery to the carrier when the goods are ready
Unsworth Transport International (Phils.), Inc. vs.
for and have been placed in the exclusive
Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 166250, July 26,
possession, custody and control of the carrier for
2010
the purpose of their immediate transportation
and the carrier has accepted them. Where such a Art. 1745 - Stipulations considered
delivery has thus been accepted by the carrier, unreasonable, unjust and contrary to public
the liability of the common carrier commences policy
eo instanti.
Valenzuela Hardwood and Industrial Supply vs.
Benito Macam vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 102316, June 30, 1997
125524, August 25, 1999
Estrellita M. Bascos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
Aniceto G. Saludo, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 101089, April 7, 1993
95536, March 23, 1992
Pedro de Guzman vs. CA and Ernesto Cendaña, G.R.
Art. 1739 - Common carrier must exercise due No. L-47822, December 22, 1988
diligence to prevent or minimize loss before,
during and after natural disaster to be exempt Art. 1749 - Stipulation limiting common
from liability carrier's liability to value of the goods appearing
in bill of lading
P a g e | 106
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Phil. Charter Insurance Corp. vs. Neptune Orient American Home Assurance, Co. vs. Court of
Lines, et al., G.R. No. 145044, June 12, 2008 Appeals, G.R. No. 94149, May 5, 1992
Yao Ka Sin Trading vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. Maritime Company of the Phils. vs. Court of
53820, June 15, 1992 Appeals, G.R. No. 47004, March 8, 1989
A stipulation in the bill of lading limiting the Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. vs. Intermediate
common carrier's liability for loss or destruction Appellate Court, G.R. No. L-69044. May 29, 1987
of a cargo to a certain sum, unless the shipper or
Art. 1755 - Duty of common carrier for safety of
owner declares a greater value, is sanctioned by
passengers
law.
Art. 1755 - Duty or common carrier for safety of
Philippine Charter Insurance Corp. vs. Neptune
passengers
Orient Lines, et al., G.R. No. 145044, June 12, 2008
Japan Airlines vs. Jesus Simangan, G.R. No. 170141,
A bill of lading is a written acknowledgement of
April 22, 2008
the receipt of goods and an agreement to
transport and to deliver them at a specified place Fortune Express vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
to a person named or on his or her order. It 119756, March 18, 1999
operates both as a receipt and as a contract. It is
a receipt for the goods shipped and a contract to Trans-Asia Shipping Lines vs. Court of Appeals,
transport and deliver the same as therein G.R. No. 118126, March 4, 1996
stipulated. As a receipt, it recites the date and
Dangwa Transportation Co., Inc. vs. Court of
place of shipment, describes the goods as to
Appeals, G.R. No. 95582, October 7, 1991
quantity, weight, dimensions, identification
marks, condition, quality, and value. As a Heirs of Amparo De Los Santos vs. Court of
contract, it names the contracting parties, which Appeals, G.R. No. 51165, June 21, 1990
include the consignee; fixes the route,
destination, and freight rate or charges; and Kapalaran Bus Line vs. Angel Coronado, G.R. No.
stipulates the rights and obligations assumed by 85331, August 25, 1989
the parties. Philippine Air Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
Unsworth Transport International (Phils.), Inc. vs. No. L-46558, July 31, 1981
Court of Appeals, et al., G.R. No. 166250, July 26, A common carrier is bound by law to exercise
2010 extraordinary diligence and utmost care in
Art. 1750 - Contract fixing the sum that may be ensuring for the safety and welfare of its
recovered by the owner or shipper for the loss, passengers with due regard for all the
destruction, or deterioration of the goods, when circumstances.
valid Philippine Airlines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, et al.,
Phil. Charter Insurance Corp. vs. Neptune Orient G.R. No. 123238, September 22, 2008
Lines, et al., G.R. No. 145044, June 12, 2008 A common carrier is bound to carry the
A stipulation in the bill of lading limiting the passengers safely as far as human care and
common carrier's liability for loss or destruction foresight can provide, using the utmost diligence
of a cargo to a certain sum, unless the shipper or of very cautious persons, with a due regard for
owner declares a greater value, is sanctioned by all the circumstances.
law. Armando G. Yrasuegui vs. Philippine Airlines,
Philippine Charter Insurance Corp. vs. Neptune Inc., G.R. No. 168081, October 17, 2008
Orient Lines, et al., G.R. No. 145044, June 12, 2008 Japan Airlines vs. Jesus Simangan, G.R. No.
Art. 1753 - Governing law 170141, April 22, 2008
P a g e | 107
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Art. 1756 - Common carriers presumed at fault Suplicio Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
or negligent in case of death of or injuries to 113578, July 14, 1995
passengers
Philippine Airlines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R.
Heirs of Amparo De Los Santos vs. Court of No. 54470, May 8, 1990
Appeals, G.R. No. 51165, June 21, 1990
The "receipt by a person of a share in the profits
Batangas Laguna Tayabas Bus Co. vs. of a business is prima facie evidence that he is a
Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. Nos. 74387-90, partner in the business."
Nov. 14, 1988
Philex Mining Corp. vs. CIR, G.R. No. 148187, April
Philippine Air Lines, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. 16, 2008
No. L-46558, July 31, 1981
As a general rule, moral damages are not
Art. 1759 - When common carriers are liable for recoverable in actions for damages predicated
negligence or willful acts of its employees on a breach of contract, unless there is fraud or
bad faith. As an exception, moral damages may
Baliwag Transit, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
be awarded in case of breach of contract of
116110, May 15, 1996
carriage that results in the death of a passenger,
Art. 1762 - Contributory negligence of in accordance with Article 1764, in relation to
passenger Article 2206 (3) of the Civil Code.
Philippine National Railways vs. Court of Appeals, [Articles 1764 and 2206] set forth the persons
G.R. No. L-55347. October 4, 1985 entitled to moral damages. The omission from
Article 2206 (3) of the brothers and sisters of the
Art. 1763 - When common carrier is responsible deceased passenger reveals the legislative intent
for willful acts or negligence of other passengers to exclude them from the recovery of moral
or of strangers damages for mental anguish by reason of the
death of the deceased. Inclusio unius est exclusio
Fortune Express vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
alterius.
119756, March 18, 1999
Sulpicio Lines, Inc. vs. Domingo E. Curso, et al., G.R.
Jose Pilapil vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 52159.
No. 157009, March 17, 2010
December 22, 1989
As a general rule, indeed, moral damages are not
A common carrier is bound to carry its
recoverable in an action predicated on a breach
passengers safely as far as human care and
of contract. This is because such action is not
foresight can provide, using the utmost diligence
included in Article 2219 of the Civil Code as one
of very cautious persons, with due regard for all
of the actions in which moral damages may be
the circumstances.
recovered. By way of exception, moral damages
Armando G. Yrasuegui vs. Philippine Airlines, Inc., are recoverable in an action predicated on a
G.R. No. 168081, October 17, 2008 breach of contract: (a) where the mishap results
in the death of a passenger, as provided in Article
Art. 1764 - Damages against common carriers 1764, in relation to Article 2206 (3), of the Civil
Japan Airlines vs. Jesus Simangan, G.R. No. 170141, Code; and (b) where the common carrier has
April 22, 2008 been guilty of fraud or bad faith, as provided in
Article 2220 of the Civil Code.
Fortune Express vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No.
119756, March 18, 1999 Philtranco Service Enterprises, Inc. vs. Felix Paras,
et al., G.R. No. 161909, April 25, 2012
Trans-Asia Shipping Lines vs. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 118126, March 4, 1996 Art. 1766 - Code of commerce and other special
laws
P a g e | 108
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
American Home Assurance, Co. vs. Court of used for such transportation and of the liability
Appeals, G.R. No. 94149, May 5, 1992 of the carrier,
ARTICLE 2. (1) This convention shall apply to which the passenger takes charge himself, the
transportation performed by the state or by legal carrier must deliver a baggage check.
entities constituted under public law provided it
(2) The baggage check shall be made out in
falls within the conditions laid down in Article 1.
duplicate, one part for the passenger and the
2. This convention shall not apply to other part for the carrier.
transportation performed under the terms of any
(3) The baggage check shall contain the
international postal convention.
following particulars:
CHAPTER II
(a) The place and date of issue;
Transportation Documents
(b) The place of departure and of destination;
SECTION I
(c) The name and address of the carrier or
Passenger Ticket carriers;
ARTICLE 3. (1) For the transportation of (d) The number of the passenger ticket;
passengers, the carrier must deliver a passenger
(e) A statement that delivery of the baggage
ticket which shall contain the following
will be made to the bearer of the baggage check;
particulars:
(f) The number and weight of the packages;
(a) The place and date of issue;
(g) The amount of the value declared in
(b) The place of departure and of destination;
accordance with article 22 (2);
(c) The agreed stopping places, provided that
(h) A statement that the transportation is
the carrier may reserve the right to alter the
subject to the rules relating to liability
stopping places in case of necessity, and that if
established by this convention.
he exercises that right, the alteration shall not
have the effect of depriving the transportation of (4) The absence, irregularity, or loss of the
its international character; baggage check shall not affect the existence or
the validity of the contract of transportation
(d) The name and address of the carrier or
which shall none the less be subject to the rules
carriers;
of this convention. Nevertheless, if the carrier
(e) A statement that the transportation is accepts baggage without a baggage check having
subject to the rules relating to liability been delivered, or if the baggage check does not
established by this convention. contain the particulars set out at (d), (f), and (h)
above, the carrier shall not be entitled to avail
(2) The absence, irregularity, or loss of the
himself of those provisions of the convention
passenger ticket shall not affect the existence or
which exclude or limit his ability.
the validity of the contract of transportation,
which shall none the less be subject to the rules SECTION III
of this convention. Nevertheless, if the carrier
Air Waybill
accepts a passenger without a passenger ticket
having been delivered he shall not be entitled to ARTICLE 5. (1) Every carrier of goods has the
avail himself of those provisions of this right to require the consignor to make out and
convention which exclude or limit his liability. hand over to him a document called an "air
waybill"; every consignor has the right to require
SECTION II
the carrier to accept this document.
Baggage Check
(2) The absence, irregularity, or loss of this
ARTICLE 4. (1) For the transportation of document shall not affect the existence or the
baggage, other than small personal objects of validity of the contract of transportation which
P a g e | 110
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
shall, subject to the provisions of Article 9, be h. The number of packages, the method of
none the less governed by the rules of this packing, and the particular marks or
convention. numbers upon them;
i. The weight, the quantity, the volume, or
ARTICLE 6. (1) The air waybill shall be made
dimensions of the goods;
out by the consignor in three original parts and
j. The apparent condition of the goods and
be handed over with the goods.
of the packing;
(2) The first part shall be marked "for the k. The freight, if it has been agreed upon,
carrier” and shall be signed by the consignor. the date and place of payment, and the
The second part shall be marked "for the person who is to pay it;
consignee"; it shall be signed by the consignor l. If the goods are sent for payment on
and by the carrier and shall accompany the delivery, the price of the goods, and, if
goods. The third part shall be signed by the the case so requires, the amount of the
carrier and handed by him to the consignor after expenses incurred;
the goods have been accepted. m. The amount of the value declared in
accordance with Article 22 (2).
(3) The carrier shall sign on acceptance of the n. The number of parts of the air waybill;
goods. o. The documents handed to the carrier to
accompany the air waybill;
(4) The signature of the carrier may be
p. The time fixed for the completion of the
stamped; that of the consignor may be printed or
transportation and a brief note of the
stamped.
route to be followed, if these matters
(5) If, at the request of the consignor, the have been agreed upon;
carrier makes out the air waybill, he shall be q. A statement that the transportation is
deemed, subject to proof to the contrary, to have subject to the rules relating to liability
done so on behalf of the consignor. established by this convention.
ARTICLE 7. The carrier of goods has the right ARTICLE 9. If the carrier accepts goods
to require the consignor to make out separate without an air waybill having been made out, or
waybills when there is more than one package. if the air waybill does not contain all the
ARTICLE 8. The air waybill shall contain the particulars set out in Article 8 (a) to (i), inclusive,
following particulars: and (q), the carrier shall not be entitled to avail
himself of the provisions of this convention
a. The place and date of its execution; which exclude or limit his liability.
b. The place of departure and of
destination; ARTICLE 10. (1) The consignor shall be
c. The agreed stopping places, provided responsible for the correctness of the particulars
that the carrier may reserve the right to and statements relating to the goods which he
alter the stopping places in case of inserts in the air waybill.
necessity, and that if he exercises that (2) The consignor shall be liable for all
right the alteration shall not have the damages suffered by the carrier or any other
effect of depriving the transportation of person by reason of the irregularity,
its international character; incorrectness or incompleteness of the said
d. The name and address of the consignor; particulars and statements.
e. The name and address of the first carrier;
f. The name and address of the consignee, ARTICLE 11. (1) The air waybill shall be prima
if the case so requires; facie evidence of the conclusion of the contract,
g. The nature of the goods; of the receipt of the goods and of the conditions
of transportation.
P a g e | 111
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
(2) The statements in the air waybill relating be entitled, on arrival of the goods at the place of
to the weight, dimensions, and packing of the destination, to require the carrier to hand over to
goods, as well as those relating to the number of him the air waybill and to deliver the goods to
packages, shall be prima facie evidence of the him, on payment of the charges due and on
facts stated; those relating to the quantity, complying with the conditions of transportation
volume and condition of the goods shall not set out in the air waybill.
constitute evidence against the carrier except so
(2) Unless it is otherwise agreed, it shall be
far as they both have been, and are stated in the
the duty of the carrier to give notice to the
air waybill to have been, checked by him in the
consignee as soon as the goods arrive.
presence of the consignor, or relate to the
apparent condition of the goods. (3) If the carrier admits the loss of the goods,
or if the goods have not arrived at the expiration
ARTICLE 12. (1) Subject to his liability to carry
of seven days after the date on which they ought
out all his obligations under the contract of
to have arrived, the consignee shall be entitled to
transportation, the consignor shall have the right
put into force against the carrier the rights which
to dispose of the goods by withdrawing them at
flow from the contract of transportation.
the airport of departure or destination, or by
stopping them in the course of the journey on ARTICLE 14. The consignor and the consignee
any landing, or by calling for them to be can respectively enforce all the rights given them
delivered at the place of destination, or in the by Articles 12 and 13, each in his own name,
course of the journey to a person other than the whether he is acting in his own interest or in the
consignee named in the air waybill, or by interest of another, provided that he carries out
requiring them to be returned to the airport of the obligations imposed by the contract.
departure. He must not exercise this right of
disposition in such a way as to prejudice the ARTICLE 15. (1) Articles 12, 13, and 14 shall not
carrier or other consignors, and he must repay affect either the relations of the consignor and
any expenses occasioned by the exercise of this the consignee with each other or the relations of
right. third parties whose rights are derived either
from the consignor or from the consignee.
(2) If it is impossible to carry out the orders
of the consignor the carrier must so inform him (2) The provisions of Article 12, 13, and 14
forthwith. can only be varied by express provision in the air
waybill.
(3) If the carrier obeys the orders of the
consignor for the disposition of the goods ARTICLE 16. (1) The consignor must furnish
without requiring the production of the part of such information and attach to the air waybill
the air waybill delivered to the latter, he will be such documents as are necessary to meet the
liable, without prejudice to his right of recovery formalities of customs, octroi, or police before
from the consignor, for any damage which may the goods can be delivered to the consignee. The
be caused thereby to any person who is lawfully consignor shall be liable to the carrier for any
in possession of that part of the air waybill. damage occasioned by the absence, insufficiency,
or irregularity of any such information or
(4) The right conferred on the consignor shall documents, unless the damage is due to the fault
cease at the moment when that of the consignee of the carrier or his agents.
begins in accordance with Article 13, below.
Nevertheless, if the consignee declines to accept (2) The carrier is under no obligation to
the waybill or the goods, or if he cannot be enquire into the correctness or sufficiency of
communicated with, the consignor shall resume such information or documents.
his right of disposition.
CHAPTER III
ARTICLE 13. (1) Except in the circumstances set
Liability of the Carrier
out in the preceding article, the consignee shall
P a g e | 112
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
ARTICLE 17. The carrier shall be liable for and his agents have taken all necessary
damage sustained in the event of the death or measures to avoid the damage.
wounding of a passenger or any other bodily
ARTICLE 21. If the carrier proves that the
injury suffered by a passenger, if the accident
damage was caused by or contributed to by the
which caused the damage so sustained took
negligence of the injured person the court may,
place on board the aircraft or in the course of
in accordance with the provisions of its own law,
any of the operations of embarking or
exonerate the carrier wholly or partly from his
disembarking.
liability.
ARTICLE 18. (1) The carrier shall be liable for
ARTICLE 22. (1) In the transportation of
damage sustained in the event of the destruction
passengers, the liability of the carrier for each
or loss of, or of damage to, any checked baggage
passenger shall be limited to the sum of 125,000
or any goods, if the occurrence which caused the
francs. Where, in accordance with the law of the
damage so sustained took place during the
court to which the case is submitted, damages
transportation by air.
may be awarded in the form of periodical
(2) The transportation by air within the payments, the equivalent capital value of the said
meaning of the preceding paragraph shall payments shall not exceed 125,000 francs.
comprise the period during which the baggage or Nevertheless, by special contract, the carrier and
goods are in charge of the carrier, whether in an the passenger may agree to a higher limit of
airport or on board an aircraft, or, in the case of a liability.
landing outside an airport, in any place
(2) In the transportation of checked baggage
whatsoever.
and of goods, the liability of the carrier shall be
(3) The period of the transportation by air limited to a sum of 250 francs per kilogram,
shall not extend to any transportation by land, by unless the consignor has made, at the time when
sea, or by river performed outside an airport. If, the package was handed over to the carrier, a
however, such transportation takes place in the special declaration of the value at delivery and
performance of a contract for transportation by has paid a supplementary sum if the case so
air, for the purpose of loading, delivery or requires. In that case the carrier will be liable to
transshipment, any damage is presumed, subject pay a sum not exceeding the declared sum,
to proof to the contrary, to have been the result unless he proves that the sum is greater than the
of an event which took place during the actual value to the consignor at delivery.
transportation by air.
(3) As regards objects of which the passenger
ARTICLE 19. The carrier shall be liable for takes charge himself the liability of the carrier
damage occasioned by delay in the shall be limited to 5,000 francs per passenger.
transportation by air of passengers, baggage, or
(4) The sums mentioned above shall be
goods.
deemed to refer to the French franc consisting of
ARTICLE 20. (1) The carrier shall not be liable if 65½ milligrams of gold at the standard of
he proves that he and his agents have taken all fineness of nine hundred thousandths. These
necessary measures to avoid the damage or that sums may be converted into any national
it was impossible for him or them to take such currency in round figures.
measures.
ARTICLE 23. Any provision tending to relieve
(2) In the transportation of goods and the carrier of liability or to fix a lower limit than
baggage the carrier shall not be liable if he that which is laid down in this convention shall
proves that the damage was occasioned by an be null and avoid, but the nullity of any such
error in piloting, in the handling of the aircraft, provision shall not involve the nullity of the
or in navigation and that, in all other respects, he whole contract, which shall remain subject to the
provisions of this convention.
P a g e | 113
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
ARTICLE 24. (1) In the cases covered by Articles ARTICLE 27. In the case of the death of the
18 and 19 any action for damages, however person liable, an action for damages lies in
founded, can only be brought subject to the accordance with the terms of this convention
conditions and limits set out in this convention. against those legally representing his estate.
(2) In the cases covered by Article 17 the ARTICLE 28. (1) An action for damages must be
provisions of the preceding paragraph shall also brought, at the option of the plaintiff, in the
apply, without prejudice to the questions as to territory of one of the High Contracting Parties,
who the persons are who have the right to bring either before the court of the domicile of the
suit and what are their respective rights. carrier or of his principal place of business or
where he has a place of business through which
ARTICLE 25. (1) The carrier shall not be entitled
the contract has been made or before the court
to avail himself of the provisions of this
at the place of destination.
convention which exclude or limit his liability, if
the damage is caused by his wilful misconduct or (2) Questions of procedure shall be governed
by such default on his part as, in accordance with by the law of the court to which the case is
the law of the court to which the case is submitted.
submitted, is considered to be equivalent to
ARTICLE 29. (1) The right to damages shall be
wilful misconduct.
extinguished if an action is not brought within 2
(2) Similarly, the carrier shall not be entitled years, reckoned from the date of arrival at the
to avail himself of the said provisions, if the destination, or from the date on which the
damage is caused under the same circumstances aircraft ought to have arrived, or from the date
by any agent of the carrier acting within the on which the transportation stopped.
scope of his employment.
(2) The method of calculating the period of
ARTICLE 26. (1) Receipt by the person entitled limitation shall be determined by the law of the
to the delivery of baggage or goods without court to which the case is submitted.
complaint shall be prima facie evidence that the
ARTICLE 30. (1) In the case of transportation to
same have been delivered in good condition and
be performed by various successive carriers and
in accordance with the document of
falling within the definition set out in the third
transportation.
paragraph of Article 1, each carrier who accepts
(2) In case of damage, the person entitled to passengers, baggage or goods shall be subject to
delivery must complain to the carrier forthwith the rules set out in this convention, and shall be
after the discovery of the damage, and, at the deemed to be one of the contracting parties to
latest, within 3 days from the date of receipt in the contract of transportation insofar as the
the case of baggage and 7 days from the date of contract deals with that part of the
receipt in the case of goods. In case of delay the transportation which is performed under his
complaint must be made at the latest within 14 supervision.
days from the date on which the baggage or
(2) In the case of transportation of this
goods have been placed at his disposal.
nature, the passenger or his representative can
(3) Every complaint must be made in writing- take action only against the carrier who
upon the document of transportation or by performed the transportation during which the
separate notice in writing dispatched within the accident or the delay occurred, save in the case
times aforesaid. where, by express agreement, the first carrier
has assumed liability for the whole journey.
(4) Failing complaint within the times
aforesaid, no action shall lie against the carrier, (3) As regards baggage or goods, the
save in the case of fraud on his part. passenger or consignor shall have a right of
action against the first carrier, and the passenger
or consignee who is entitled to delivery shall
P a g e | 114
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
have a right of action against the last carrier, and ARTICLE 34. This convention shall not apply to
further, each may take action against the carrier international transportation by air performed by
who performed the transportation during which way of experimental trial by air navigation
the destruction, loss, damage, or delay took enterprises with the view to the establishment of
place. These carriers shall be jointly and regular lines of air navigation, nor shall it apply
severally liable to the passenger or to the to transportation performed in extraordinary
consignor or consignee. circumstances outside the normal scope of an air
carrier's business.
CHAPTER IV
ARTICLE 35. The expression "days" when used
Provisions Relating to Combined
in this convention means current days, not
Transportation
working days.
ARTICLE 31. (1) In the case of combined
ARTICLE 36. This convention is drawn up in
transportation performed partly by air and
French in a single copy which shall remain
partly by any other mode of transportation, the
deposited in the archives of the Ministry for
provisions of this convention shall apply only to
Foreign Affairs of Poland and of which one duly
the transportation, by air, provided that the
certified copy shall be sent by the Polish
transportation by air falls within the terms of
Government to the Government of each of the
Article 1.
High Contracting Parties.
(2) Nothing in this convention shall prevent
ARTICLE 37. (1) This convention shall be
the parties in the case of combined
ratified. The instruments of ratification shall be
transportation from inserting in the document of
deposited in the archives of the Ministry for
air transportation conditions relating to other
Foreign Affairs of Poland, which shall give notice
modes of transportation, provided that the
of the deposit to the Government of each of the
provisions of this convention are observed as
High Contracting Parties.
regards the transportation by air.
(2) As soon as this convention shall have
CHAPTER V
been ratified by five of the High Contracting
General and Final Provisions Parties it shall come into force as between them
on the ninetieth day after the deposit of the fifth
ARTICLE 32. Any clause contained in the ratification. Thereafter it shall come into force
contract and all special agreements entered into between the High Contracting Parties which
before the damage occurred by which the parties shall have ratified and the High Contracting
purport to infringe the rules laid down by this Party which deposits its instrument of
convention, whether by deciding the law to be ratification on the ninetieth day after the deposit.
applied, or by altering the rules as to jurisdiction,
shall be null and void. Nevertheless, for the (3) It shall be the duty of the Government of
transportation of goods arbitration clauses shall the Republic of Poland to notify the Government
be allowed, subject to this convention, if the of each of the High Contracting Parties of the
arbitration is to take place within one of the date on which this convention comes into force
jurisdictions referred to in the first paragraph of as well as the date of the deposit of each
article 28. ratification.
ARTICLE 33. Nothing contained in this ARTICLE 38. (1) This convention shall, after it
convention shall prevent the carrier either from has come into force, remain open for adherence
refusing to enter into any contract of by any state.
transportation or from making regulations which
(2) The adherence shall be effected by a
do not conflict with the provisions of this
notification addressed to the Government of the
convention. Republic of Poland, which shall inform the
P a g e | 115
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Government of each of the High Contracting French Republic which will take the necessary
Parties thereof. measures to make preparations for such
conference.
(3) The adherence shall take effect as from
the ninetieth day after the notification made to ADDITIONAL PROTOCOL
the Government of the Republic of Poland.
With Reference to Article 2
ARTICLE 39. (1) Any one of the High
The High Contracting Parties reserve to
Contracting Parties may denounce this
themselves the right to declare at the time of
convention by a notification addressed to the
ratification or of accession that the first
Government of the Republic of Poland, which
paragraph of Article 2 of this convention shall
shall at once inform the Government of each of
not apply to international transportation by air
the High Contracting Parties.
performed directly by the state, its colonies,
(2) Denunciation shall take effect six months protectorates, or mandated territories, or by any
after the notification of denunciation and shall other territory under its sovereignty, suzerainty,
operate only as regards the party which shall or authority. (Please see contracting parties)
have proceeded to denunciation.
WARSAW CONVENTION RELATED
ARTICLE 40. (1) Any High Contracting Party PHILIPPINE CASES
may, at the time of signature or of deposit of
[G.R. No. 151783. July 8, 2003.]
ratification or of adherence, declare that the
VICTORINO SAVELLANO, VIRGINIA B.
acceptance which it gives to this convention does
SAVELLANO and DEOGRACIAS B. SAVELLANO,
not apply to all or any of its colonies,
petitioners, vs. NORTHWEST AIRLINES,
protectorates, territories under mandate, or any
respondent.
other territory subject to its sovereignty or its
authority, or any other territory under its Petitioners were passengers of respondent
suzerainty. airline and their contract of carriage with the
latter was for the San Francisco-Tokyo(Narita)-
(2) Accordingly, any High Contracting Party Manila flights. Petitioners claimed, however, that
may subsequently adhere separately in the name this itinerary was not followed when the aircraft
of all or any of its colonies, protectorates, used for the first segment of the journey
territories under mandate, or any other territory developed engine trouble. Petitioners likewise
subject to its sovereignty or to its authority or claimed that the contents of their baggage which
was not allowed to be placed inside the
any other territory under its suzerainty which
passengers' baggage compartment were stolen.
have been thus excluded by its original Consequently, petitioners filed a case for
declaration. damages which was decided by the trial court in
their favor. On appeal, the Court of Appeals
(3) Any High Contracting Party may reversed the decision of the trial court. Hence,
denounce this Convention, in accordance with its this petition.
provisions, separately or for all or any of its
colonies, protectorates, territories under The Supreme Court ruled that the change of
mandate, or any other territory subject to its petitioners' flight itinerary does not fall under
sovereignty or to its authority, or any other the situation covered by the phrase "may alter or
omit stopping places shown in the ticket in case
territory under its suzerainty.
of necessity." A case of necessity must first be
ARTICLE 41. Any High Contracting Party shall proven. The burden of proving it necessarily fell
on respondent. This responsibility it failed to
be entitled not earlier than two years after the
discharge. Respondent failed to show a case of
coming into force of this convention to call for necessity for changing the stopping place from
the assembling of a new international conference Tokyo to Los Angeles and Seoul. Thus,
in order to consider any improvements which respondent committed a breach of the contract
may be made in this convention. To this end it of carriage. However, the Court ruled that moral
will communicate with the Government of the damages cannot be awarded in the case at bar
P a g e | 116
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
because of the absence of bad faith, ill will, PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs.
malice or wanton conduct on the part of COURT OF APPEALS, DR. JOSEFINO MIRANDA
respondent. Neither are exemplary damages and LUISA MIRANDA, respondents.
proper in the present case because respondent
has not been proven to have acted in a wanton, Although the Warsaw Convention has the force
fraudulent, reckless, oppressive or malevolent and effect of law in this country, being a treaty
manner. Nevertheless, the Court awarded commitment assumed by the Philippine
nominal damages to petitioners. Nominal government, said convention does not operate as
damages are recoverable if no actual, substantial an exclusive enumeration of the instances for
or specific damages were shown to have resulted declaring a carrier liable for breach of contract of
from the breach, as in the case at bar. The Court carriage or as an absolute limit of the extent of
also held that the claim for the alleged lost items that liability. The Warsaw Convention declares
from the baggage of petitioners cannot prosper the carrier liable in the enumerated cases and
because they failed to give timely notice of the under certain limitations. However, it must not
loss to respondent. be construed to preclude the operation of the
Civil Code and pertinent laws. It does not
A claim for the alleged lost items from the regulate, much less exempt, the carrier from
baggage of petitioners cannot prosper because liability for damages for violating the rights of its
they failed to give timely notice of the loss to passengers under the contract of carriage,
respondent. The Conditions printed on the especially if willful misconduct on the part of the
airline ticket plainly read: "2. Carriage hereunder carrier's employees is found or established.
is subject to the rules and limitations relating to (Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd. vs. Court of Appeals,
liability established by the Warsaw Convention et al., G.R. No. 60501, March 5, 1993)
unless such carriage is not 'International
carriage' as defined by that Convention... "7. [G.R. No. 171092. March 15, 2010.]
Checked baggage will be delivered to bearer of EDNA DIAGO LHUILLIER, petitioner, vs.
the baggage check. In case of damage to baggage BRITISH AIRWAYS, respondent.
moving in international transportation
complaint must be made in writing to carrier Petitioner contends that in Santos III v.
forthwith after discovery of damage, and at the Northwest Orient Airlines, the cause of action
latest, within 7 days from receipt; in case of was based on a breach of contract while her
delay, complaint must be made within 21 days cause of action arose from the tortious conduct
from date the baggage was delivered..." The of the airline personnel and violation of the Civil
pertinent provisions of the Rules Relating to Code provisions on Human Relations. In
International Carriage by Air (Warsaw addition, she claims that our pronouncement in
Convention) state: "Article 26 (1) Receipt by the Santos III v. Northwest Orient Airlines that "the
person entitled to delivery of luggage or goods allegation of willful misconduct resulting in a
without complaint is prima facie evidence that tort is insufficient to exclude the case from the
the same have been delivered in good condition comprehension of the Warsaw Convention," is
and in accordance with the document of carriage. more of an obiter dictum rather than the ratio
(2) In case of damage, the person entitled to decidendi. She maintains that the fact that said
delivery must complain to the carrier forthwith acts occurred aboard a plane is merely
after the discovery of the damage, and, at the incidental, if not irrelevant.
latest, within three days from the date of receipt
in the case of luggage and seven days from date We disagree with the position taken by the
of receipt in the case of goods. In the case of petitioner. Black defines obiter dictum as "an
delay the complaint must be made at the latest opinion entirely unnecessary for the decision of
within fourteen days from the date on which the the case" and thus "are not binding as
luggage or goods have been placed at his precedent." In Santos III v. Northwest Orient
disposal. (3) Every complaint must be made in Airlines, Augusto Santos III categorically put in
writing upon the document of carriage or by issue the applicability of Article 28 (1) of the
separate notice in writing dispatched within the Warsaw Convention if the action is based on tort.
times aforesaid. (4) Failing complaint within the In the said case, we held that the allegation of
times aforesaid, no action shall lie against the willful misconduct resulting in a tort is
carrier, save in the case of fraud on his part." insufficient to exclude the case from the realm of
the Warsaw Convention. In fact, our ruling that a
[G.R. No. 119641. May 17, 1996.] cause of action based on tort did not bring the
P a g e | 117
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
case outside the sphere of the Warsaw In this case, it is not disputed that respondent is
Convention was our ratio decidendi in disposing a British corporation domiciled in London,
of the specific issue presented by Augusto Santos United Kingdom with London as its principal
III. Clearly, the contention of the herein place of business. Hence, under the first and
petitioner that the said ruling is an obiter dictum second jurisdictional rules, the petitioner may
is without basis. bring her case before the courts of London in the
United Kingdom. In the passenger ticket and
Relevant to this particular issue is the case of baggage check presented by both the petitioner
Carey v. United Airlines, where the passenger and respondent, it appears that the ticket was
filed an action against the airline arising from an issued in Rome, Italy. Consequently, under the
incident involving the former and the airline's third jurisdictional rule, the petitioner has the
flight attendant during an international flight option to bring her case before the courts of
resulting to a heated exchange which included Rome in Italy. Finally, both the petitioner and
insults and profanity. The United States Court of respondent aver that the place of destination is
Appeals (9th Circuit) held that the "passenger's Rome, Italy, which is properly designated given
action against the airline carrier arising from the routing presented in the said passenger
alleged confrontational incident between ticket and baggage check. Accordingly, petitioner
passenger and flight attendant on international may bring her action before the courts of Rome,
flight was governed exclusively by the Warsaw Italy. We thus find that the RTC of Makati
Convention, even though the incident allegedly correctly ruled that it does not have jurisdiction
involved intentional misconduct by the flight over the case filed by the petitioner.
attendant."
[G.R. No. 152122. July 30, 2003.]
In Bloom v. Alaska Airlines, the passenger CHINA AIRLINES, petitioner, vs. DANIEL
brought nine causes of action against the airline CHIOK, respondent.
in the state court, arising from a confrontation
with the flight attendant during an international In denying the petition, the Supreme Court ruled
flight to Mexico. The United States Court of that petitioner cannot evade liability to
Appeals (9th Circuit) held that the "Warsaw respondent. even though it may have been only a
Convention governs actions arising from ticket issuer for the Hong Kong-Manila sector.
international air travel and provides the Although the contract of air transportation was
exclusive remedy for conduct which falls within between petitioner and respondent, with the
its provisions." It further held that the said former endorsing to PAL the Hongkong-to-
Convention "created no exception for an injury Manila segment of the journey, such contract of
suffered as a result of intentional conduct” which carriage has always been treated in this
in that case involved a claim for intentional jurisdiction as a single operation. According to
infliction of emotional distress. the Court, for reasons of public interest and
policy, the ticket-issuing airline acts as principal
It is thus settled that allegations of tortious in a contract of carriage and is thus liable for the
conduct committed against an airline acts and the omissions of any errant carrier to
passenger during the course of the which it may have endorsed any sector of the
international carriage do not bring the case entire, continuous trip. The Court likewise
outside the ambit of the Warsaw Convention. affirmed the award of moral and exemplary
damages. Both the trial and appellate courts
xxx found that the respondent had satisfactorily
proven the existence of the factual basis for the
Under Article 28 (1) of the Warsaw Convention, damages adjudged against petitioner CAL and
the plaintiff may bring the action for damages PA.
before —
1. the court where the carrier is domiciled; [G.R. No. 122308. July 8, 1997.]
2. the court where the carrier has its principal PURITA S. MAPA, CARMINA S. MAPA and
place of business; CORNELIO P. MAPA, petitioners, vs. COURT OF
3. the court where the carrier has an APPEALS AND TRANS-WORLD AIRLINES INC.,
establishment by which the contract has respondents.
been made; or
4. the court of the place of destination. Petitioners filed with the trial court a complaint
for damages. The trial court dismissed the case
P a g e | 118
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
for lack of jurisdiction in light of Article 28(1) of injuries and the interests of air carriers seeking
the Warsaw Convention. The trial court held that to limit potential liability. It employs a scheme of
the Warsaw Convention is applicable in case at strict liability favoring passengers and imposing
bar, since the Philippines and the United States damage caps to benefit air carriers. The cardinal
are parties to the convention, the contracts of purpose of the Warsaw Convention is to provide
transportation come within the meaning of uniformity of rules governing claims arising from
"International Transportation." The trial court international air travel; thus, it precludes a
also held that the Philippines, not being one of passenger from maintaining an action for
the places specified in Art. 28 (1) of the Warsaw personal injury damages under local law when
Convention where the complaint may be his or her claim does not satisfy the conditions of
instituted then it has no jurisdiction over the liability under the Convention.
present case. On appeal to the Court of Appeals,
the appellate court affirmed the ruling of the trial Article 19 of the Warsaw Convention provides
court. Hence, the present petition. The Supreme for liability on the part of a carrier for "damages
Court ruled that the contracts does not fall under occasioned by delay in the transportation by air
the category of international transportation as of passengers, baggage or goods." Article 24
provided by the Warsaw Convention. The only excludes other remedies by further providing
way to bring the contracts between petitioners that "(1) in the cases covered by articles 18 and
Purita and Carmina Mapa on the one hand, and 19, any action for damages, however founded,
TWA on the other, within the category of can only be brought subject to the conditions and
international transportation is to link them or to limits set out in this convention." Therefore, a
make them an integral part of the Manila — Los claim covered by the Warsaw Convention can no
Angeles travel of Purita and Carmina through Pal longer be recovered under local law if the statute
aircraft. However, the alleged international of limitations of two years has already lapsed.
tickets issued by TWA were not presented in
evidence, clearly then; there is at all no factual Nevertheless, this Court notes that jurisprudence
basis of the finding that the TWA tickets were in the Philippines and the United States also
issued in conjunction with the international recognizes that the Warsaw Convention does not
tickets. "exclusively regulate" the relationship between
passenger and carrier on an international flight.
THIRD DIVISION This Court finds that the present case is
[G.R. No. 149547. July 4, 2008.] substantially similar to cases in which the
PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner, vs. damages sought were considered to be outside
HON. ADRIANO SAVILLO, Presiding Judge of the coverage of the Warsaw Convention.
RTC Branch 30, Iloilo City, and SIMPLICIO
GRIÑO, respondents. In United Airlines v. Uy, this Court distinguished
between the (1) damage to the passenger's
In determining whether PAL's Motion to Dismiss baggage and (2) humiliation he suffered at the
should have been granted by the trial court, it hands of the airline's employees. The first cause
must be ascertained if all the claims made by the of action was covered by the Warsaw Convention
private respondent in his Complaint are covered which prescribes in two years, while the second
by the Warsaw Convention, which effectively was covered by the provisions of the Civil Code
bars all claims made outside the two-year on torts, which prescribes in four years.
prescription period provided under Article 29
thereof. If the Warsaw Convention covers all of Similar distinctions were made in American
private respondent's claims, then Civil Case No. jurisprudence. In Mahaney v. Air France, a
23773 has already prescribed and should passenger was denied access to an airline flight
therefore be dismissed. On the other hand, if between New York and Mexico, despite the fact
some, if not all, of respondent's claims are that she held a confirmed reservation. The court
outside the coverage of the Warsaw Convention, therein ruled that if the plaintiff were to claim
the RTC may still proceed to hear the case. damages based solely on the delay she
experienced — for instance, the costs of renting
The Warsaw Convention applies to "all a van, which she had to arrange on her own as a
international transportation of persons, baggage consequence of the delay — the complaint would
or goods performed by any aircraft for hire." It be barred by the two-year statute of limitations.
seeks to accommodate or balance the interests of However, where the plaintiff alleged that the
passengers seeking recovery for personal airlines subjected her to unjust discrimination or
P a g e | 119
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Covers only overseas trade Under Section 3 (6) of the COGSA, the carrier is
discharged from liability for loss or damage to
It does not apply to undelivered or lost goods. the cargo "unless the suit is brought within one
year after delivery of the goods or the date when
An action to recover must be filed within a the goods should have been delivered." 29
period of one year from the discharge; If there is Jurisprudence, however, recognized the validity
no delivery, the one-year period starts from the of an agreement between the carrier and the
day the vessel left port in case of undelivered or shipper/consignee extending the one-year
lost cargo, or from delivery to the arrastre in period to file a claim.
case of damaged good.
The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA),
[G.R. No. 166250. July 26, 2010.] Public Act No. 521 of the 74th US Congress, was
UNSWORTH TRANSPORT INTERNATIONAL accepted to be made applicable to all contracts
(PHILS.), INC., petitioner, vs. COURT OF for the carriage of goods by sea to and from
APPEALS and PIONEER INSURANCE AND Philippine ports in foreign trade by virtue of CA
SURETY CORPORATION, respondents. No. 65.
It is to be noted that the Civil Code does not limit Section 1 of CA No. 65 states:
the liability of the common carrier to a fixed
amount per package. In all matters not regulated Section 1. That the provisions of Public Act
by the Civil Code, the rights and obligations of Numbered Five hundred and twenty-one of the
common carriers are governed by the Code of Seventy-fourth Congress of the United States,
Commerce and special laws. Thus, the COGSA approved on April sixteenth, nineteen hundred
supplements the Civil Code by establishing a and thirty-six, be accepted, as it is hereby accepted
provision limiting the carrier's liability in the to be made applicable to all contracts for the
absence of a shipper's declaration of a higher carriage of goods by sea to and from Philippine
value in the bill of lading. 30 Section 4 (5) of the ports in foreign trade: Provided, That nothing in
COGSA provides: the Act shall be construed as repealing any
existing provision of the Code of Commerce which
(5) Neither the carrier nor the ship shall in any is now in force, or as limiting its application.
event be or become liable for any loss or damage
to or in connection with the transportation of Section 1, Title I of CA No. 65 defines the relevant
goods in an amount exceeding $500 per package terms in Carriage of Goods by Sea, thus:
of lawful money of the United States, or in case of Section 1. When used in this Act. —
goods not shipped in packages, per customary
freight unit, or the equivalent of that sum in other (a) The term "carrier" includes the owner or
currency, unless the nature and value of such the charterer who enters into a contract of
goods have been declared by the shipper before carriage with a shipper.
shipment and inserted in the bill of lading. This
declaration, if embodied in the bill of lading, shall (b) The term "contract of carriage" applies
only to contracts of carriage covered by a bill of
P a g e | 120
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
lading or any similar document of title, insofar as That if a notice of loss or damage, either
such document relates to the carriage of goods apparent or concealed, is not given as provided
by sea, including any bill of lading or any similar for in this section, that fact shall not affect or
document as aforesaid issued under or pursuant prejudice the right of the shipper to bring suit
to a charter party from the moment at which within one year after the delivery of the goods or
such bill of lading or similar document of title the date when the goods should have been
regulates the relations between a carrier and a delivered.
holder of the same. From the provision above, the carrier and the
ship may put up the defense of prescription if the
(c) The term "goods" includes goods, wares, action for damages is not brought within one
merchandise, and articles of every kind year after the delivery of the goods or the date
whatsoever, except live animals and cargo which when the goods should have been delivered. It
by the contract of carriage is stated as being has been held that not only the shipper, but also
carried on deck and is so carried. the consignee or legal holder of the bill may
(d) The term "ship" means any vessel used invoke the prescriptive period. However, the
for the carriage of goods by sea. COGSA does not mention that an arrastre
(e) The term "carriage of goods" covers the operator may invoke the prescriptive period of
period from the time when the goods are loaded one year; hence, it does not cover the arrastre
to the time when they are discharged from the operator.
ship.
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES ON
It is noted that the term "carriage of goods" TRANSPORTATION LAW
covers the period from the time when the goods
are loaded to the time when they are discharged The diligence requirement imposed on common
from the ship; thus, it can be inferred that the carriers is a constant question in every bar exam.
period of time when the goods have been
discharged from the ship and given to the In the case of Nedlloyd B.V.Rotterdam vs.
custody of the arrastre operator is not covered Glowlaks Enterprises, Ltd., (GR no.156330,
by the COGSA. November 19, 2014), the Supreme Court again
repeated that, “Common carriers are responsible
The prescriptive period for filing an action for
the loss or damage of the goods under the COGSA for the loss, destruction or deterioration of goods
is found in paragraph (6), Section 3, thus: unless the same is due to flood, storm, earthquake
or other natural disaster or calamity.
6) Unless notice of loss or damage and the Extraordinary diligence is that extreme care and
general nature of such loss or damage be given in caution which persons of unusual prudence and
writing to the carrier or his agent at the port of circumspection use for securing or preserving
discharge before or at the time of the removal of
their own property or rights.”
the goods into the custody of the person entitled
to delivery thereof under the contract of Thus, the High Court reiterated in the same case
carriage, such removal shall be prima facie
that, “When the goods shipped are either lost or
evidence of the delivery by the carrier of the
goods as described in the bill of lading. If the loss arrived in damaged condition, a presumption
or damage is not apparent, the notice must be arises against the carrier of its failure to observe
given within three days of the delivery. that diligence, and there not be an express finding
Said notice of loss or damage may be endorsed of negligence to hold it liable. To overcome the
upon the receipt for the goods given by the presumption of negligence, the common carrier
person taking delivery thereof. must establish by adequate proof that it exercised
extraordinary diligence over the goods. It must do
The notice in writing need not be given if the
state of the goods has at the time of their receipt more than merely show that some other party
been the subject of joint survey or inspection. could be responsible for the damage.”
In any event the carrier and the ship shall be
discharged from all liability in respect of loss or What are the remedies of a consignee if the
damage unless suit is brought within one year goods he was expecting to be delivered are
after delivery of the goods or the date when the rendered useless?
goods should have been delivered: Provided,
P a g e | 121
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
This was one of the issues that the Supreme depositor and a warehouseman. Hence, in the
Court had to address in the case of Loadstar performance of its obligations, an arrastre
Shipping Company vs. Malayan Insurance Inc., operator should observe the same degree of
(GR no.185565, November 26, 2014). In this diligence as that required of a common carrier
case, the High Court stated that, “If goods are and a warehouseman. Being the custodian of
rendered useless for sale, consumption, or for the goods discharged from a vessel, an arrastre
intended purpose, the consignee may reject the operator’s duty is to take care of the goods and
goods and demand payment of such goods at their to turn them over to the party entitled to their
market price on that day pursuant to Article 365 possession.”
of the Code of Commerce of the Philippines. In case
If a contract of carriage and bill of lading is
the damaged portion of the goods can be
silent on the computation of damages, what
segregated from those delivered in good condition,
contract will govern the parties?
the consignee may reject those in damaged
condition and accept merely those which are in Where a contract of carriage as well as of bill of
good condition. But if the consignee is able to lading is silent as regards the computation of
prove that it is impossible to use those goods damages, the relevant provisions of the Civil
which were delivered in good condition without Code of the Philippines and the Code of
the others, then the entire shipment may be Commerce shall govern the contract between the
rejected.” parties.
What is a slot charter agreement? What is the “Limited Liability Rule?”
It is a contract of affreightment, whereby the use Also called the “no vessel, no liability
of the shipping space on vessels is leased in part doctrine,” it provides that liability of ship owner
or as a whole, to carry goods for others. It may be is limited to ship owner’s interest over the
for a determinate period of time (time charter) vessel. Consequently, in case of loss, the ship
or for a single or consecutive voyage (voyage owner’s liability is also extinguished. Limited
charter). The charterer is free from liability to liability likewise extends to ship’s
third persons in respect of the ship. appurtenances, equipment, freightage, and
insurance proceeds. The ship owner’s or agent’s
What is a bareboat or demise charter
liability is merely co-extensive with his interest
agreement?
in the vessel, such that a total loss of the vessel
In a charter by demise or bareboat, the whole results in the liability’s extinction. The vessel’s
vessel is let to the charterer with a transfer to total destruction extinguishes maritime liens
him of its entire command and possession and because there is no longer any res to which they
consequent control over its navigation, including can attach. (Monarch Insurance v. CA, G.R. No.
the master and its crew. The charterer therefore 92735, June 8, 2000)
becomes the owner for the voyage or service
Are there any exceptions to the “Limited
stipulated and hence liable for damages or loss
Liability Rule’?
sustained by the goods transported.
1. Repairs and provisioning of the vessel before
What is the degree of diligence requirement
the loss of the vessel; (Art. 586)
for an arrastre operator?
2. Insurance proceeds. If the vessel is insured,
In Asian Terminals Inc, vs. First Lepanto Taisho
the proceeds will go to the persons entitled to
Insurance Corp. (GR no.185964, June 16, 2014),
claim from the shipowner; (Vasquez v. CA, G.R.
the Supreme Court emphasized that, “The
No. L-42926, Sept. 13, 1985)
relationship between the consignee and arrastre
operator is akin to that existing between the 3. Workmen’s Compensation cases (now
consignee and/or the owner of the shipped Employees’ Compensation under the Labor
goods and the common carrier, or that between a
P a g e | 122
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Code); (Oching v. San Diego, G.R. No. 775, Dec. 2. Pre-Negotiated (sec. 76)
17, 1946)
3. Out of Court or Informal (sec. 83)
4. When the shipowner is guilty of fault or
negligence; Note: But if the captain is the one Voluntary Involuntary Pre-
Negotiated
Informal
Commencement Order shall be reckoned court: Provided, that any final and
from the date of the filing of the amended executory judgment of such court or
or supplemental petition or the submission agency shall be referred to the court and
of such documents. shall be treated as a non-disputed claim
• Under Section 16, the “Commencement “(c) to the enforcement of claims against
Order” shall, among others: (i) declare sureties and other persons solidarily
that the debtor is under rehabilitation, (ii) liable with the debtor, and third party or
direct publication of the Order and notice accommodation mortgagors as well as
to creditors, (iii) appoint a rehabilitation issuers of letters of credit, unless the
receiver, (iv) set the date of the initial property subject of the third party or
hearing for the determination of whether accommodation mortgage is necessary for
or not the debtor can be rehabilitated, (v) the rehabilitation of the debtor as
direct all creditors to file their claims at determined by the court upon
least five (5) days from initial hearing and recommendation by the rehabilitation
(vi) direct the government, through the receiver;
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to
“(d) to any form of action of customers or
either file its Comment to the Petition for
clients of a securities market participant
Rehabilitation or present its claims
to recover or otherwise claim moneys or
against the debtor.
securities entrusted to the latter in the
SUSPENSION OR STAY ORDER ordinary course of the latter’s business as
well as any action of such securities
• In addition, the Commencement Order
market participant or the appropriate
shall include a Suspension or Stay Order
regulatory agency or self-regulating
prohibiting the sale or disposition of
organization to pay of settle such claims
assets of the debtor and ordering the
or liabilities;
suspension of all actions against the
debtor and/or the debtor’s estate. The “(f) the clearing and settlement of
scope and/or coverage of the stay financial transactions through the
order under the FRIA remain as broad facilities of a clearing agency or similar
as before. However, certain cases are entities duly authorized, registered
allowed to proceed until the execution and/or recognized by the appropriate
stage regulatory agency like the Bangko Sentral
ng Pilipinas (BSP) and the SEC as well as
• Section 18. Exceptions to the Stay or
any form of actions of such agencies or
Suspension Order. – The Stay or
entities to reimburse themselves for any
Suspension Order shall not apply:
transactions settled for the debtor; and
“(a) to cases already pending appeal in
“(g) Any criminal action against the
the Supreme Court as of commencement
individual debtor or owner, partner,
date: Provided, that any final and
director or officer of a debtor shall not be
executory judgment arising from such
affected by any proceeding commenced
appeal shall be referred to the court for
under this Act.”
appropriate action;
• Note that pursuant to sub-paragraph (c)
“(b) subject to the discretion of the court,
above, the suspension order does not
to cases pending or filed at a specialized
cover the enforcement of claims against
court or quasi-judicial agency which,
“persons solidarily liable with the debtor”
upon determination by the court, is
including “issuers of letters of credit.”
capable of resolving the claim more
quickly, fairly and efficiently than the
P a g e | 124
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
This follows the rule in MWSS vs. Daway earlier, the imposition of all taxes and fees,
[GR No. 160732, 21 June 2004] which including penalties interests and charges
held that a letter of credit is excluded thereof, due to the national government or
from the jurisdiction of the to LGUs shall be considered waived, in
rehabilitation court. furtherance of the objectives of
rehabilitation.”
• On the other hand, the Stay or Suspension
Order applies with equal force to the • Section 57 of the law grants the debtor
enforcement of both secured and the power to confirm or cancel pre-
unsecured claims except that under existing contracts within ninety (90) days
Section 60 of the FRIA, the issuance of from the issuance of the Commencement
the Stay or Suspension Order “shall not Order in order to weed out extremely
be deemed in any way to diminish or onerous contracts that may have been the
impair the security or lien of a secured cause of the debtor’s predicament.
creditor, or the value of his lien or
Validity of Contracts
security, except that his right to
enforce said security or lien may be • “Section 57. Treatment of Contracts. –
suspended during the term of the Stay Unless cancelled by virtue of a final
Order.” Again, this paraphrases the judgment of a court of competent
“equality in equity” principle the effects of jurisdiction issued prior to the issuance of
which were explained in the case of the Commencement Order, or at anytime
Tsuneishi Heavy Industries (Cebu), Inc. v. thereafter by the court before which the
Negros Navigation Co., Inc. et. al. [GR rehabilitation proceedings are pending, all
166845, 10 December 2008], valid and subsisting contracts of the debtor
with creditors and other third parties as at
• Continuous Supply of Goods and Services
the commencement date shall continue in
To ensure continuous delivery of goods force: Provided, That within ninety (90)
and services necessary for the debtor’s days following the commencement of
business, the FRIA adopts the provision proceedings, the debtor, with the consent
under the 2008 Rules granting the of the rehabilitation receiver, shall notify
rehabilitation court authority to include each contractual counterparty of whether
in the Commencement Order a it is confirming the particular contract.
prohibition enjoining the debtor’s Contractual obligations arising or
suppliers from withholding supply of performed during this period, and
essential goods and services afterwards for confirmed contracts, shall
be considered administrative expenses.
Waiver of Taxes
Contracts not confirmed within the
• Section 19 of the law provides that from required deadline shall be considered
the time of the issuance of the terminated. Claims for actual damages, if
Commencement Order until the approval any, arising as a result of the election to
of the Rehabilitation Plan or dismissal of terminate a contract shall be considered a
the petition, the imposition of all taxes pre-commencement claim against the
shall be waived, thus: debtor. Nothing contained herein shall
prevent the cancellation or termination of
• “Section 19. Waiver of Taxes and Fees Due any contract of the debtor for any ground
to the National Government and to Local provided by law.
Government Units. – Upon issuance of the
Commencement Order by the court, and • The initial appointment of the
until the approval of the Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Receiver (as one of the
Plan or dismissal of the Petition, which is elements of the Commencement Order
under Section 16) is subject to the
P a g e | 125
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
discretion of the court, which may retain “In case the court appoints the rehabilitation
the original appointee or choose another receiver to assume the powers of
from the petitioners’ nominees. However, management of the debtor, the court may:
this discretion is limited in the following
“(1) require the rehabilitation receiver to
circumstances:
post an additional bond;
• (a) In case the debtor is a securities
“(2) authorize him to engage the services
market participant, in which case the
or employ persons or entities to assist
court shall give priority to the nominee of
him in the discharge of his managerial
the appropriate securities or investor
functions; and
protection fund; or
“(3) authorize a commensurate increase
• (b) If the qualified natural or juridical
in his compensation.”
person is nominated by more than 50% of
secured creditors and general unsecured • As part of its functions, the Rehabilitation
creditors, in which case the court “shall Receiver retains the authority to file an
appoint the creditors’ nominee.” action to annul certain pre-
commencement transactions intended to
• The Rehabilitation Receiver will not
defraud the creditors. Indeed, this power
supplant the existing management of the
can be traced back to the basic authority
debtor corporation unless otherwise
of the receiver to undertake measures to
ordered by the court on motion of any
preserve property under receivership
interested party, thus:
under the Rules of Court23.
“Section 36. Displacement of Existing
• Should the receiver refuse to institute
Management by the Rehabilitation
proceedings, any creditor may take up the
Receiver or Management Committee. - -
cudgels of the corporation with leave of
Upon motion of any interested party, the
court. If successful, Section 59 of the law
court may appoint and direct the
provides that the fruits of the case will
rehabilitation receiver to assume the
redound to the pro-active creditor to the
powers of management of the debtor, or
extent of the value of its credit plus costs,
appoint a management committee that
will undertake the management of the Administration Proceedings
debtor, upon clear and convincing evidence
of any of the following circumstances: • Within forty (40) days from the issuance
of the Commencement Order, the court
shall set the case for Initial Hearing to
determine whether or not there is
a) Actual or imminent danger of
substantial likelihood that the debtor can
dissipation, loss, wastage or destruction
be rehabilitated
of the debtor’s assets or other properties;
• Within forty (40) days from the Initial
(b) Paralyzation of the business
Hearing, the Rehabilitation Receiver is
operations of the debtor; or
required to submit his written Report to
(c) Gross mismanagement of the debtor, the court, which will include a
or fraud or other wrongful conduct on the determination of (a) whether or not there
part of, or gross or willful violation of this is substantial likelihood for the debtor to
Act by, existing management of the debtor be successfully rehabilitated or in the
or the owner, partner, director, officer or alternative (b) whether the debtor should
representative/s in management of the be dissolved or liquidated. After
debtor. submission of report, the Court shall act
on the petition by: (i) giving due course to
P a g e | 126
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
the petition, (ii) dismissing the petition or section, the Plan is deemed to have been
(iii) converting the proceedings into one approved by a class of creditors if members
for liquidation. of the said class holding more than fifty per
cent (50%) of the total claims of the said
• In the event the court gives due course to
class vote in favor of the Plan. The votes of
the petition, the court will require the
the creditors shall be based solely on the
Rehabilitation Receiver to review the
amount of their respective claims based on
Rehabilitation Plan, taking into
the registry of claims submitted by the
consideration the views of the debtor and
rehabilitation receiver pursuant to Section
all creditor classes. While the consultation
44 hereof.
is a necessary procedure, the Receiver is
not bound by the objections of the parties. • Rehabilitation Court can confirm even if
creditors object
• Section 62 of the FRIA provides that
Rehabilitation Plan must include Notwithstanding the rejection of the
provisions establishing classes and Rehabilitation Plan, the court may
subclasses of voting creditors. After confirm the Rehabilitation Plan if all of
identifying the appropriate creditor the following circumstances are present:
classes and sub-classes, the Plan must
“(a) the Rehabilitation Plan complies with
“specify the treatment of each class or
all the requirements specified in this Act;
subclass” and “provide for equal
treatment for all claims within the same “(b) the rehabilitation receiver
class.” recommends the confirmation of the
Rehabilitation Plan;
• Similar to the 2008 Rules, Section 62
grants additional protection to secured “(c) The shareholders, owners or partners
creditors by requiring the Plan to of the juridical debtor lose at least their
“maintain the security interest of secured controlling interest as a result of the
creditors and preserve the liquidation Rehabilitation Plan; and
value of the security.”
“(d) The Rehabilitation Plan would likely
• Once satisfied with the version of the provide the objecting class of creditors
Rehabilitation Plan, the receiver must with compensation which has a net
convene the creditors and present the present value greater than that which
plan to them for approval. Unlike the old they would have received if the debtor
procedure however, the vote of the were under liquidation.”
debtor is not required for the approval of
the plan. Cram Down Provision
• “Section 64. Creditor Approval of the Even if the Rehabilitation Plan is not
Rehabilitation Plan. – The rehabilitation approved by the creditors, the court may still
receiver shall notify the creditors and confirm the Plan if it can be shown that
stakeholders that the Plan is ready for objecting class of creditors shall receive a
their examination. Within twenty (20) days “net present value greater than that they
from the said notification, the would have received if the debtor were
rehabilitation receiver shall convene the under liquidation.” Under the Interim Rules,
creditors, either as a whole or per class, for the debtor can force court approval of a
purposes of voting on the approval of the Rehabilitation Plan over the objection of
Plan. The Plan shall be deemed rejected creditors by merely showing that “[t]he plans
unless approved by all classes of creditors would likely provide the objecting class of
whose rights are adversely modified or creditors with compensation greater than
affected by the Plan. For purposes of this that which they would have received if the
P a g e | 127
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
assets of the debtor were sold by a liquidator operation of the corporation during the
within a three-month period.” The 2008 period of rehabilitation.
Rules 33 changed the basis to “present
One Year Rule
value projected in the plan”. Requiring
that the computation be based on “net • To prevent the debtor (or any interested
present value” is intended to prevent party) from dragging out the proceedings
debtors from railroading a rehabilitation in the hopes of obtaining a settlement on
plan disadvantageous to the creditors by the basis of attrition, the law fixes a
the simple expedient of stretching maximum period of one year (from the
time of the filing of the petition) within
• In corporate rehabilitation
which the plan must be confirmed.
proceedings, whose rights shall prevail
Otherwise, the proceedings will turn into
over the other?
one of liquidation. This should force the
• This was the issue that the Supreme parties to negotiate in earnest.
Court had to confront with in the case of
• SECOND METHOD: PRE-NEGOTIATED
Aquino vs. Pacific Plans, Inc., (GR
REHABILITATION
no.193108, December 10, 2014) involving
the plan holders and other creditors of • Debtor by himself or jointly with
pre-need company Pacific Plans. The Creditors
Supreme Court ruled that: “While the
voice and participation of the creditors is File a petition for the approval of a pre-
crucial in the determination of the viability negotiated rehabilitation plan provided
of the rehabilitation plan, as they stand to that it has been endorsed by creditors
benefit or suffer in the implementation holding at least 2/3 of the total liabilities
thereof, the interests of all stakeholders is of the debtor, including secured creditors
the ultimate and prime consideration.” holding more than 50 percent of the total
secured claims and unsecured creditors
• In relation to corporate rehabilitation holding more than 50 percent of the total
proceedings, the Supreme Court in the unsecured claims
case of Philippine Bank of
Communications vs. Basic Polyprinters • The FRIA gives the parties the freedom to
and Packaging Corporation (GR undertake the proceedings without a
no.187581, October 2014) ruled as well receiver.
that the purpose of such proceedings is
• The Order under Section 77 of the law
two-fold – (1.) To efficiently and
which directs interested parties to file
equitably distribute the assets of the
their objections to the Pre-Negotiated
insolvent debtor to its creditors; and
Rehabilitation Plan also requires
(2.) To provide the debtor with a fresh
publication and personal delivery of a
start.
copy of the Petition to each creditor who
• The “material financial commitment” rule is not a petitioner but who holds at least
was also discussed in the same 10%37 of the total liabilities of the
aforementioned case. This rule becomes debtor.
significant in determining the earnestness
• Grounds to object Pre-Negotiated
and good faith of the financially
Rehabilitation
distressed corporation in financing its
proposed rehabilitation plan. This “Section 79. Objection to the Petition or
material financial commitment may Rehabilitation Plan. – Any creditor or other
include the readiness, willingness and interested party may submit to the court a
ability of the corporation to contribute verified objection to the petition or the
funds or property to guarantee the
P a g e | 128
NOTES ON MERCANTILE LAW REVIEW 2018
GUILLER B. ASIDO, Ll.M.
Rehabilitation Plan not later than eight (8) notice to all creditors is published in a
days from the date of the second newspaper of general circulation once a
publication of the Order mentioned in week for two consecutive weeks. The said
Section 77 hereof. The objection shall be notice must invite the creditors to
limited to the following: participate in the negotiation of the plan
and inform them that the plan will be
“(a) The allegations in the petition or the
binding on all creditors if the required
Rehabilitation Plan, or the attachments
votes are obtained.
thereto are materially false or misleading;
Cram down effect
“(b) The majority of any class of the
creditors do not in fact support the • An out-of-court Rehabilitation Plan
Rehabilitation Plan; approved by at least 67% of secured
creditors, 75% of unsecured creditors,
“(c) The Rehabilitation Plan fails to
and 85% of all creditors42 will be
accurately account for a claim against the
“crammed down” all creditors pursuant to
debtor and the claim is not categorically
Section 86 of the law.
declared as a contested claim; or
• Section 86. Cram Down Effect. – A
“(d) The support of the creditors, or any of
restructuring/workout agreement or
them, was induced by fraud.
Rehabilitation Plan that is approved
• If, after due hearing, the courts find merit pursuant to an informal workout
to the objection, it will order the debtor to framework referred to in this chapter shall
cure the defect. have the same legal effect as confirmation
of a Plan under Section 69 hereof. The
• On the other hand, if it finds that the notice of the Rehabilitation Plan or
petitioners acted in bad faith or that the restructuring agreement or Plan shall be
defect is incurable, it may order the published once a week for at least three (3)
conversion of proceedings into one for consecutive weeks in a newspaper of
liquidation38. As in the 2008 Rules, the general circulation in the Philippines. The
Rehabilitation Plan will be deemed Rehabilitation Plan or restructuring
approved if the court fails to act within a agreement shall take effect upon the lapse
period of 120 days. of fifteen (15) days from the date of the last
publication of the notice thereof.”
THIRD METHOD OF REHABILITATION:
OUT OF COURT SETTLEMENT Cross Border Insolvency
• Pursuant to Section 89 of the Act, “[t]he • By virtue of Section 139 of the FRIA, the
insolvent debtor and creditor may seek Philippines is now deemed to adopt the
court assistance for the execution or provisions of the UNCITRAL Model Law on
implementation” of the Rehabilitation Cross Border Insolvency (1997) subject to
Plan, provided that it meets the minimum procedural rules to be promulgated by the
requirements of the law. Supreme Court. Essentially, the law
provides a framework for the recognition
• To allow the parties to negotiate a
of foreign insolvency proceedings and
feasible workout plan, the debtor and
grants certain parties in such proceedings
creditors holding more than 50% of the
access to Philippine courts for purposes of
debt may agree on a standstill period
obtaining some form of affirmative or
pending the completion of the plan for up
other relief.
to 120 days, provided in addition that