Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Materials Development For Language Learning and Teaching - PPTX Adlı Dosyanın Kopyası
Materials Development For Language Learning and Teaching - PPTX Adlı Dosyanın Kopyası
• The reality, though, is that for the last forty years most
coursebooks have been and are still using PPP approaches,
with a focus on discrete forms and frequent use of such
low-level practice activities as listen and repeat, dialogue
repetition, matching and filling in the blanks.
Pedagogic approaches
Recently many writers have proposed more experiential approaches
to using language-learning materials. For example, Bolitho (2003),
Bolitho & Tomlinson (2005), Bolitho et al. (2003) and Tomlinson (1994,
2007b) have proposed a language awareness approach, in which
learners first experience a text holistically and then analyse it with a
view to making discoveries for themselves about language use.
Tomlinson (2003) has advocated a text-driven approach in which
learners first respond to a text personally before exploiting it for
creative and analytical activities and Prabhu (1987), Ellis (1998, 2003,
2011), Van den Branden (2006), Willis (1996) and Willis & Willis (2007)
have advocated task-driven approaches in which the learners’ target
is task completion and the teacher’s objective is language
development. Masuhara (2006) and Tomlinson (2001) have suggested
multi-dimensional approaches to materials development in which the
learners make use of sensory imagery, motor imagery, inner speech,
emotion and thought to respond to texts and carry out tasks. What all
these approaches have in common is a move away from teaching
points driving the material and a belief in the importance of
Authenticity of texts and tasks
Explicit teaching of language through contrived examples
and texts helps the learners by focusing their processing
energies on the target feature, and this is what most
coursebooks typically do. However, many SLA researchers
argue that this overprotects learners and does not prepare
them for the reality of language use outside the classroom.
Such researchers as Little et al. (1994), Bacon & Finneman
(1990), Kuo (1993), McGarry (1995),Wong, Kwok&Choi
(1995), Nuttall (1996), Mishan (2005), Gilmore (2007a, 2007b)
and Rilling & Dantas-Whitney (2009) argue that authentic
materials can provide meaningful exposure to language as
it is actually used, motivate learners and help them develop
a range of communicative competencies and enhance
positive attitudes towards the learning of a language.
Acceptability
• Most publishers are understandably anxious to avoid giving
offence and often supply their authors with lists of taboo
topics, as well as guidelines on how to avoid sexism and
racism.
• A number of authors have objected to what they see as
sometimes excessive caution (e.g. Wajnryb 1996; Tomlinson
2001) and have complained about the unengaging blandness
of commercially published materials.