Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Chapter 11

International
Human Rights
Regimes
Mai de los Santos
I. Global Human Rights Regime

International Regimes
• “Systems of norms and decision
making procedures accepted by
states and other international actors
as binding in a particular issue area”
Decision making procedures
Involves binding international decision
Enforcement making (and international monitoring
of national compliance)
Includes monitoring practices and
policy coordination - states use
Implementation international forums to coordinate
policies under national control
Information exchange and efforts to
Promotion encourage/assist national
implementation of international norms

• Can be used to classify regimes, which can be


further classified as relatively strong or weak
• Declaratory regime - involves international
norms, but no international decision-making
Who/what are the main
actors in a global human
rights regime?
• The Universal Declaration and International
Human Rights Covenants - provide norms
• Principal actors include:
• UN Human Rights Council
• “Treaty bodies”
• UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights
The Human Rights Council
• Impartial forum for development of new
international human rights norms (ex. Conventions
of PWDs)
• Efforts: to promote the implementation of human
rights, multilateral monitoring (limited in scope)
• Special rapporteurs and working groups
Treaty Bodies
• 9 human rights treaties establish a committee of
experts to monitor implementation
• Second major focus on multilateral implementation
activity for internationally recognized human rights

Activities of the treaty bodies


• Reporting - principal & most important activity
• General Comments
• Complaint Procedures
Reporting
Public Written Publishing
Report Questions Discussion Exchange Comments
• Limited, non-coercive monitoring
• Two major limits:
• Positive effects depend on state willingness
• Changes are likely to be limited and incremental, not systematic
General Comments
• Quasi-authoritative interpretations of nature of obligations
under a treaty
• Ex. “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or
degrading treatment or punishment…” (Article 7, ICCPR)
Complaint Procedures
• Individual “communications” screened by the OHCHR,
recommendations made and given to gov’t in question
• Voluntary participation; not binding in international law
The High Commissioner for
Human Rights

• Important role: information


dissemination
• Administrative and research support for
the treaty bodies and UN Human Rights
Council
• Illustrates the possibilities for progressive
cooperative action with governments
II. Political Foundations of the Global Regime

• Post World War II


• Circumstances made it easy to agree on a set
of international principles against violations of
basic rights, HOWEVER
• Decision-making remained entirely national
• Remains a declaratory regime
• Why? Because nations value tangible benefits
• Human are a “profoundly national” issue in
Universal Declaration model
III. & IV.
Regional Human Rights Regimes and
Single-Issue Human Rights Regimes

• “Autonomous, but relatively coherently


nested international human rights (sub)
regimes”
• Single-issue human rights regimes - less
institution-bound; restrict their activities to
a limited range of issues
III. Regional Human Rights Regimes

A. The European Regional Regime


• “Strong system of regional human rights
enforcement”
• “Evolutive interpretation”
B. The Inter-American System
• Relatively weaker than European counterpart
• Optional recognition of jurisdiction
C. The African Regional Regime
• “Clawback clauses”
D. The Arab World & Asia
• Non-existent until recent years
IV. Single-Issue Human Rights Regimes

A. Minority Rights
B. The Slave Trade & Slavery
C. Workers’ Rights
D. Genocide and Crimes against
Humanity
E. Racial Discrimination
F. Torture
G. Women’s Rights
H. Children
I. Disabled People
J. Indigenous Peoples’ Rights
Indigenous Peoples’ Rights
• Debate: are they international human rights?
• Distinctive in the context of human rights for 4 reasons:
1. More than three fifths of all states have no indigenous
peoples in their territories
2. Requires the creation of special mechanisms
3. Rights are held by the group and not individual
members
4. Economic costs of indigenous peoples’ rights claims -
astronomical (ex. US and Canada)
V. Assessing Multilateral Human Rights
Mechanisms

Source of Authority
• HR institutions draw influence from broader
organizations
• Avoid politicization to maximize impact
Range or Focus
• Single-issue/thematic initiatives - less threatening
Character of Powers
• Individual complaint mechanisms - relies on the commitment
of states to abide by proceedings and implement decisions;
can only address a small number of cases
VI. The Evolution of Human Rights Regimes
• Promotional regimes remain the rule
• Movement from declaratory regime?
• When states accept norms stronger than non-binding
guidelines: declaratory regimes —> promotional
regimes
• Requires a large qualitative jump in transition to
implementation or enforcement
• Largest contributor to a strong regime: national
commitment
• Enforcement regimes are regional
• Importance of dominant power and hegemony
• Effective exercise of power requires ideological
justification
Overview

• There are norms and decision-making procedures that guide


govern international human rights: regimes.
• There are principal actors/key figures that are involved in giving
authority to these regimes.
• From the Global Regime, there may be “nested” region-specific
or single-issue regimes
• These “sub” regimes have varying key institutions and
mechanisms.
• We can assess the impact and effectivity of these mechanisms.
• How do we move from a promotional regime to a “stronger”
implemented or enforced regime?
• There are limitations of multilateral action in the global human
rights regime.
Chapter 11

End

You might also like