FIRST RESPONSE TO COURT NO CONSENT TO APPEAR IV D Is Voluntary

1 Your name
2 Your address
[City, ST ZIP Code]
3
5 [COURT NAME]
6
7
[PLAINTIFF'S NAME], Case No.: [Number]
8
Plaintiff,
9
NOTICE OF MOTION
10 vs.
DEMAND DISMISSAL FOR THIS
11 STATE AND TRIBUNAL LACKS
[DEFENDANT'S NAME],
PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER
12
Defendant THE BODY OF THE
13 RESPONDENT WHO IS NOT A
14
PERSON OR A NATURAL
PERSON, THIS RESPONSE BY
15 THE RESPONDENT IS EVIDENCE
16 OF HIS CONTESTING THAT HE IS
NOT SUBJECTED TO TITLE IV-D
17
CHILD SUPPORT
18 ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS
AND HIS REFUSAL TO SUBMIT
19
PERSONAL JURISDICTION TO
20 THIS STATE
21
NOTICE OF MOTION
22
23 DEMAND DISMISSAL FOR THIS STATE AND TRIBUNAL

24
LACKS PERSONAL JURISDICTION OVER THE BODY OF THE
25
NOTICE OF MOTIONDEMAND DISMISSAL FOR THIS STATE AND TRIBUNAL LACKS PERSONAL 1
26 JURISDICTION OVER THE BODY OF THE RESPONDENT WHO IS NOT A PERSON OR A NATURAL
PERSON, THIS RESPONSE BY THE RESPONDENT IS EVIDENCE OF HIS CONTESTING THAT HE IS
NOT SUBJECTED TO TITLE IV-D CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS AND HIS
REFUSAL TO SUBMIT PERSONAL JURISDICTION TO THIS STATE -
1 RESPONDENT WHO IS NOT A PERSON OR A NATURAL PERSON,
2
THIS RESPONSE BY THE RESPONDENT IS EVIDENCE OF HIS
3
4 CONTESTING THAT HE IS NOT SUBJECTED TO TITLE IV-D CHILD

5
SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS AND HIS REFUSAL TO
6
7
SUBMIT PERSONAL JURISDICTION TO THIS STATE
9
Comes now, [Type in your name and remove the brackets] is a
10
11 Sovereign1 State Citizen2 National3 as defined under 8 USC 1101(a)(21) and is

12
unconditionally sovereign4 whenever inside a state Court or administrative
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 1
Sovereign - Noun a monarch; a king, queen, or other supreme ruler..
2
"One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v State, 15
21 Ind. 449; Cory v Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis.
443."
22 Mc Donel v State, 90 Ind. Rep. 320 at pg 323;
3
8 U.S. Code § 1101. Definitions (21) The term “national” means a person owing permanent
23 allegiance to a state.
4
Sovereign as an adjective is defined in five ways by Webster’s Dictionary 1. chief or highest;
24 supreme; paramount….2. supreme or highest in power; superior in position to all others;chief.3. independent of,
and unlimited by, any other; possessing, or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.4.
25 excellent; efficacious; effectual; controlling.5. of the highest degree; extreme.
1 tribunal5 and thereby he cannot be subjected to legal process6 without his
2
consent.
3
4 Thereby, as a sovereign state citizen national this state court or administrative
5 tribunal is prohibited to deny due process by presuming the undersigned

6
Sovereign State Citizen National is a private person7 or person8 who may
7
8 subjected to legal process,9 quasi-judicial proceedings.10
9 It is a violation of due process for this court or tribunal to rely upon

10
presumptions rather than facts and thereby it is prohibited to presume it can
11
12 prosecute the undersigned respondent as a private person or person by legal
13 process or quasi-judicial proceedings.

14
15
16
5
Tribunal The court, administrative agency, or quasi-judicial agency authorized to establish or
17
modify support orders or to determine parentage.(Page 25) GLOSSARY OF COMMON
CHILD SUPPORT TERMS Office of Child Support Enforcement
18 https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_glossary.pdf
6
42 USC § 659(i)(5)The term “legal process” means any writ, order, summons, or other similar
19 process in the nature of garnishment— (A)which is issued by— (i)a court or an administrative agency of competent
jurisdiction in any State, territory, or possession of the United States;
20 7
42 USC SECTION 659 private person (4)The term “private person” means a person who does
not have sovereign or other special immunity or privilege which causes the person not to be subject to legal process.
21 8
42 USC § 1301(a)(3)The term “person” means an individual, a trust or estate, a partnership, or a
corporation.
22 9
process in the nature of garnishment— (A)which is issued by— (i)a court or an administrative agency of competent
23 jurisdiction in any State, territory, or possession of the United States;
10
Quasi-judicial Definition 1) A proceeding conducted by an administrative or executive official
24 that is similar to a court proceeding, e.g. a hearing. A court may review a decision arising from a quasi-judicial
proceeding. 2) A judicial act performed by an official who is either not a judge or not acting in his or her capacity as
25 a judge.
1
2
FACTS PRESENTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED RESPONDENT
3
4 IS PROOF HE IS A SOVEREIGN STATE CITIZEN THAT DID NOT

5
CONSENT TO LEGAL PROCESS FOR CHILD SUPPORT AND
6
7
PATERNITY ESTABLISHMENT PROCEEDINGS AND IS CONTESTING
8 THE STATE COURT OR TRIBUNAL DOES NOT HAVE PERSONAL

9
JURISDICTION AND THEREBY CANNOT FORCE THE UNDERSIGNED
10
11 TO BE SUBJECTED TO LEGAL PROCESS

12
13
14
15 1. Contesting based upon a fact [Type in your name and remove the brackets]
16
is a sovereign state citizen national and thereby the court or administrative
17
18 tribunal is prohibited to presume he is a private person or person that can be
19 subjected to legal process,11 quasi-judicial proceedings,12 federal statutes,

20
21
22
23 11
process in the nature of garnishment— (A)which is issued by— (i)a court or an administrative agency of competent
24 jurisdiction in any State, territory, or possession of the United States;
12
Quasi-judicial Definition 1) A proceeding conducted by an administrative or executive official
25 that is similar to a court proceeding, e.g. a hearing. A court may review a decision arising from a quasi-judicial
1 United States Codes, and non-positive laws without informed consent13. It is
2
a violation of due process for this court or tribunal to rely upon presumption
3
4 and thereby it is prohibited to presume it can prosecute the undersigned
5 respondent as a private person or person by legal process or quasi-judicial

6
proceedings.
7
8 2. Contesting, the facts the States participation in Title IV-D is voluntary to
9
receive federal funds under Aid to Families with Dependent Children
10
(AFDC), for which the State Child Support Enforcement entity is required
11
12 to follow the guidelines under 42 USC Sections 651-669(b) and therefore

13
consent is required to participate in Title IV-D program for Child Support
14
15 Enforcement.
16
3. Contesting, Cooperative agreements14 created under 42 USC Section
17
654(7), 45 CFR 302.34, 45 CFR 303.107 is evidence the parties involved in
18
19
20
21
proceeding. 2) A judicial act performed by an official who is either not a judge or not acting in his or her capacity as
22 a judge.
13
Informed Consent “An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made
23 with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives.”
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/informed_consent
14
24 A cooperative agreement is an agreement in which the Federal Government provides funding or
a thing of value authorized by public statute and the government plays a substantial role. A cooperative agreement is
25 a form of assistance. It reflects a relationship between the U.S. Government and a recipient.
1 the establishment of paternity and child support enforcement have a
2
financial incentive and are not impartial or disinterested and thereby this
3
4 contract between the federal government and state child support agency is
5
evidence Title IV-D15 of the Social Security Act under 42 USC Section 651-
6
7
669(b) are consistent with violation of Bill of Attainder clause under Article
8 1 Section 10 of the constitution for the United states of America by

9
presuming guilt and punishing a non-custodial parent or Obligor by
10
11 immediately demanding payment of support by wage garnishment. For this

12
court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond with a written rebuttal
13
14
or this court or tribunal will default and this fact shall stand as truth to
15 clearly support that this court or tribunal lacks personal jurisdiction to order
16
the undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must discharge matter
17
18 and cease and desist sending communications.

19
20
21
22
15
23 IV-D (Four-D) Refers to Part D of title IV of the Social Security Act. Title IV-D established the
child support program. (Page 14) GLOSSARY OF COMMON
24 CHILD SUPPORT TERMS Office of Child Support Enforcement
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_glossary.pdf
25
1 4. It is a fact, the man, [TYPE IN YOUR NAME AND REMOVE
2
BRACKETS] is contesting that he is not an employee for a federal agency
3
4 or a member of the United States Uniformed Services and is not subjected

5
to legal process for Child Support Enforcement under Executive Order
6
7
12953 sec 301 and 42 USC Section 651-669(b) and therefore consent is
8 required to participate in Title IV-D program for Child Support

9
Enforcement For this court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond
10
11 with a written rebuttal or this court or tribunal will default and this fact shall
12
stand as truth this court or tribunal lacks personal jurisdiction to order the
13
14
undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must discharge matter and
15 cease and desist sending communications.

16
5. Contesting based upon fact the offspring of undersigned respondent is not in
17
18 foster care to allow the custodial parent to assign State support rights under
19
42 USC Section 608(a)(3)16. The petitioner must provide evidence that the
20
21
22
23
16
42 U.S. Code § 656. Support obligation as obligation to State; amount; discharge in bankruptcy
24 (a) Collection processes
(1) The support rights assigned to the State pursuant to section 608(a)(3) of this title or secured on
25 behalf of a child receiving foster care maintenance payments shall constitute an obligation owed to such State by the
1 offspring of the petitioner is in foster care allowing the assignment of
2
support rights to the State and without evidence showing the offspring is in
3
4 foster care, then the State has no authority to collect support on behalf of the
5
petitioner and thereby this is matter must be discharged immediately
6
7
without terms.
8 6. Contesting based upon the fact, that the undersigned respondent is a man
9
and is not a private person, natural person or person17 or federal employee
10
11 of the executive branch of the United States. The petitioner must provide
12
evidence to rebut this fact or the fact stands as a rebutted fact and thereby
13
14
this is matter must be discharged immediately without terms.
15 7. Contesting based upon the adjudicated fact,18 there are two classes of
16
citizens, which supports the fact the undersigned respondent is a citizen of a
17
18
19
20
21
individual responsible for providing such support. Such obligation shall be deemed for collection purposes to be
22 collectible under all applicable State and local processes.
17
28 U.S. Code § 3002 - Definitions (10) “Person” includes a natural person (including an
23 individual Indian), a corporation, a partnership, an unincorporated association, a trust, or an estate, or any other
public or private entity, including a State or local government or an Indian tribe.
18
24 "There are two classes of citizens, citizens of the United States and of the State. And one may be
a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter" Gardina v. Board of Registers 48 So. 788, 169 Ala. 155
25 (1909)
1 state, while not being a Citizen19 of the United States20 and thereby
2
sovereign from federal statutes, United States Codes and non-positive laws.
3
4 The facts presented by the undersigned respondent is proof the court or

5
tribunal is prohibited to presume the undersigned respondent is a citizen of
6
7
the United States. The petitioner must provide evidence to rebut this fact or
8 the fact stands as a rebutted fact and thereby this is matter must be
9
discharged immediately without terms.
10
11 8. Contesting based upon the adjudicated fact21 by the Supreme Court the
12
petitioner is lawfully required to introduce evidence showing an injury in
13
14
fact22 that is concrete and particularized and fairly traceable to the
15
16
17
19
“The privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment protects very few rights
18 because it neither incorporates any of the Bill of Rights nor protects all rights of individual citizens. See Slaughter-
House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L. Ed. 394 (1873). Instead, this provision protects only those rights peculiar
19 to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate to state citizenship. Id.
Accordingly, it is not necessary that plaintiffs have non-resident status in order to bring a claim under the privileges
20 and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. As discussed below in section E(a), however, plaintiffs have
failed to state a claim under the privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”
21 20
28 U.S. Code § 3002 - Definitions (15) “United States” means—(A) a Federal corporation; (B)
an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the
22 United States.
21
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 - Supreme Court 1992
22
23 "To satisfy Article III's standing requirements, a plaintiff must show (1) it has suffered an
`injury in fact' that is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical;(2)
24 the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant; and (3) it is likely, as opposed to merely
speculative, that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision” Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 US 555 -
25 Supreme Court 1992
1 challenged action by the respondent, and thereby this court or tribunal is
2
prohibited from presuming the petitioner has standing until it can produce
3
4 evidence introduced by the petitioner showing the petitioner has suffered an

5
injury in fact or the court or tribunal must discharge this matter immediately
6
7
for the petitioner lacks standing and the court lacks personal jurisdiction to
8 prosecute the respondent.

9
9. Contesting based upon the fact [type in your name and remove brackets] is a
10
11 man, a sovereign23 state citizen,24 and thereby as a sovereign state citizen25

12
the court is prohibited to presume he is a member of the Uniform Services26
13
14
and subjected to legal process and wage withholding.
15
16
17
18
19 23
Sovereign - Noun a monarch; a king, queen, or other supreme ruler.
24
"One may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson v State,
20 15 Ind. 449; Cory v Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis.
443."
21 Mc Donel v State, 90 Ind. Rep. 320 at pg 323;
25
"It will be admitted on all hands that with the exception of the powers granted to the states and
22 the federal government, through the Constitutions, the people of the several states are unconditionally sovereign
within their respective states." Ohio L. Ins. & T. Co. v. Debolt, 16 How. 416, 14 L.Ed. 997.
26
23 Ex. Ord. No. 12953, Feb. 27, 1995, 60 F.R. 11013, Sec. 202. "Uniformed Services" means
the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard, and the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and
24 Atmospheric Administration, and the Public Health Service.
25
1 10. Contesting, the undersigned State-citizen is not domiciled within the
2
geographical area of the term "State " defined in 42 USC Section 651-669b
3
4 as the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin

5
Islands, Guam, and American Samoa and thereby the federal statutes 42
6
7
USC Section 651-669b are not enforceable in the state where the
8 undersigned State-citizen is domiciled and therefore consent is required to

9
participate in Title IV-D program for Child Support Enforcement For this
10
11 court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond with a written rebuttal
12
or this court or tribunal will default and this fact shall stand as truth this
13
14
court or tribunal lacks personal jurisdiction to order the undersigned
15 respondent to appear and thereby must discharge matter and cease and
16
desist sending communications.
17
18 11. The man, [TYPE IN YOUR NAME AND REMOVE BRACKETS]

19
contests that any State entity entering into a cooperative agreements 42 USC
20
21
Section 654(7), 45 CFR 302.34, 45 CFR 303.107 to receive federal funds is
22 a contractual matter and is proof the proceedings for child support

23
enforcement are not impartial and violate due process and therefore consent
24
25
1 is required to participate in Title IV-D program for Child Support
2
Enforcement. For this court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond
3
5
6
7

9
12. Contesting, that Title 42 The Public Health and Welfare is not positive law
10
11 and therefore has the appearance of law, but has not been enacted and must
12
be rebutted and this written response is a rebuttal with facts that will show
13
14
that this tribunal lacks jurisdiction to force the undersigned respondent to
15 participate in the proceedings for child support enforcement27 established

16
under the State’s adoption of uniform State laws called Personal
17
18
19
20
21
27
22 Ex. Ord. No. 12953, Feb. 27, 1995, 60 F.R. 11013 Sec. 203. "Child support enforcement"
means any administrative or judicial action by a court or administrative entity of a State necessary to establish
23 paternity or establish a child support order, including a medical support order, and any actions necessary to enforce a
child support or medical support order. Child support actions may be brought under the civil or criminal laws of a
24 State and are not limited to actions brought on behalf of the State or individual by State agencies providing services
under title IV-D of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 651 et seq.
25
1 Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 28. For this
2
court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond with a written rebuttal
3
4 or this court or tribunal will default and this fact shall stand as truth this
5
court or tribunal lacks personal jurisdiction to order the undersigned
6
7
respondent to appear and thereby must discharge matter and cease and
8 desist sending communications. For this court or tribunal to object to this

9
fact it must respond with a written rebuttal or this court or tribunal will
10
11 default and this fact shall stand as truth this court or tribunal lacks personal
12
jurisdiction to order the undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must
13
14
discharge matter and cease and desist sending communications.
15 13.This written response is evidence that the respondent is contesting and

16
rebutting claims that the respondent’s appearance is mandatory for the
17
18 State’s participation in Title IV-D program or child support enforcement

19
20
21
28
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Personal Responsibility and
22 Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996’’.TITLE III—CHILD SUPPORT Sec. 321. ADOPTION OF
UNIFORM STATE LAWS [42 U.S.C. Section 666] is amended by adding at the end the following new
23 subsection: “(f) Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.—In order to satisfy [42 U.S.C. 654(20)(A)], on and after
January 1, 1998, each State must have in effect the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, as approved by the
24 American Bar Association on February 9, 1993, together with any amendments officially adopted before January 1,
1998, by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws.” P.L. 104-193, Section 321, 110 Stat.
25 2221. https://www.congress.gov/104/plaws/publ193/PLAW-104publ193.pdf
1 proceedings enacted under Executive Order 12953 and 42 USC Section
2
651-669(b) is voluntary (Please refer to footnote Wehunt v. Ledbetter, 875
3
4 F. 2d 1558 - Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 1989) and thereby the

5
undersigned respondent must submit to the jurisdiction of the court, waive
6
7
consent and not contest proceedings for the court to hold the undersigned in
8 default for refusing to appear. For this court or tribunal to object to this fact
9
it must respond with a written rebuttal or this court or tribunal will default
10
11 and this fact shall stand as truth this court or tribunal lacks personal
12
jurisdiction to order the undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must
13
14
discharge matter and cease and desist sending communications.
15 14. Contesting, it is a fact under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act the
16
undersigned respondent cannot be held in default unless he has submitted to
17
18 jurisdiction of the court and did not contest and consented to the
19
proceedings. For this court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond
20
21
with a written rebuttal or this court or tribunal will default and this fact shall
22 stand as truth this court or tribunal lacks personal jurisdiction to order the
23
24
25
1 undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must discharge matter and
2
cease and desist sending communications.
3
4 15. Contesting, it is a fact, that this Notice to the Court is evidence that the
5
respondent is not submitting to the court’s jurisdiction. For this court or
6
7
tribunal to object to this fact it must respond with a written rebuttal or this
8 court or tribunal will default and this fact shall stand as truth this court or
9
tribunal lacks personal jurisdiction to order the undersigned respondent to
10
11 appear and thereby must discharge matter and cease and desist sending
12
communications.
13
14
16. Contesting, it is a fact, that this Notice to the Court is evidence that the
15 respondent is contesting the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act

16
proceedings. For this court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond
17
19
20
21

23
24
25
1 17. Contesting, it is a fact, that this Notice to the Court is evidence that the
2
respondent is not a nonresident and is not consenting to the proceedings
3
4 under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act. For this court or tribunal
5
to object to this fact it must respond with a written rebuttal or this court or
6
7
tribunal will default and this fact shall stand as truth this court or tribunal
8 lacks personal jurisdiction to order the undersigned respondent to appear

9
and thereby must discharge matter and cease and desist sending
10
11 communications.
12
18. Contesting, it is an adjudicated fact Wehunt v. Ledbetter, 875 F. 2d 1558 -
13
14
Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 1989 the State’s participation in Title IV-D
15 is voluntary29 and thereby the State cannot force one of its citizens to
16
participate in the same Title IV-D matter where the State’s participation is
17
18 voluntary. For this court or tribunal to object to this fact it must respond
19
20
21
22 29
“Although state participation in the Social Security Act itself is mandatory, participation by a
state in the IV-D program is voluntary. It is enacted pursuant to the spending power of Congress. Case law
23 interpretation of Congress' power to legislate pursuant to the spending power has recognized that when Congress
fixes the terms on which it shall disburse federal money to the state, it is much in the nature of a contract: in return
24 for federal funds, the states agree to comply with federally imposed conditions.” Wehunt v. Ledbetter, 875 F. 2d
1558 - Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 1989
25
2
3
4 undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must discharge matter and

5
cease and desist sending communications.
6
7
19. Contesting, it is a fact that under the Federal Uniform Interstate Family
8 Support Act30 and State Uniform Family Support Act requires the
9
undersigned to submit to the jurisdiction of the court and consent to
10
11 participate in the legal progress for establishment of Paternity and Child

12
Support Enforcement. For this court or tribunal to object to this fact it must
13
14
respond with a written rebuttal or this court or tribunal will default and this
15 fact shall stand as truth this court or tribunal lacks personal jurisdiction to
16
order the undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must discharge
17
18 matter and cease and desist sending communications.

19
20
21
30
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT JURISDICTION SECTION 201.
22 BASES FOR JURISDICTION OVER NONRESIDENT (a) In a proceeding to establish, or enforce, or modify a
support order or to determine parentage, a tribunal of this State may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident
23 individual [or the individual’s guardian or conservator] if:
(1) the individual is personally served with [citation, summons, notice] within this State;
24 (2) the individual submits to the jurisdiction of this State by consent in a record, by entering a
general appearance, or by filing a responsive document having the effect of waiving any contest to personal
25 jurisdiction;
1
3
THIS COURT MUST RESPOND IN WRITING WITH A
4
REBUTTAL TO THE AFOREMENTIONED FACTS OR IT MUST
5
6 IMMEDIATELY DISCHARGE OR DISMISS THIS MATTER

7
8
The undersigned sovereign state citizen requires a written rebuttal to
9
the aforementioned facts or must discharge or dismiss this matter.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16 Dated this [day] of [Month], [year].

17
18
19 Your Name
20
21
22
23
24
25

FIRST RESPONSE TO COURT NO CONSENT TO APPEAR IV D Is Voluntary

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

FIRST RESPONSE TO COURT NO CONSENT TO APPEAR IV D Is Voluntary

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Your name

23 DEMAND DISMISSAL FOR THIS STATE AND TRIBUNAL

4 CONTESTING THAT HE IS NOT SUBJECTED TO TITLE IV-D CHILD

11 Sovereign1 State Citizen2 National3 as defined under 8 USC 1101(a)(21) and is

4 Thereby, as a sovereign state citizen national this state court or administrative

5 tribunal is prohibited to deny due process by presuming the undersigned

8 subjected to legal process,9 quasi-judicial proceedings.10

9 It is a violation of due process for this court or tribunal to rely upon

12 prosecute the undersigned respondent as a private person or person by legal

13 process or quasi-judicial proceedings.

4 IS PROOF HE IS A SOVEREIGN STATE CITIZEN THAT DID NOT

8 THE STATE COURT OR TRIBUNAL DOES NOT HAVE PERSONAL

11 TO BE SUBJECTED TO LEGAL PROCESS

18 tribunal is prohibited to presume he is a private person or person that can be

19 subjected to legal process,11 quasi-judicial proceedings,12 federal statutes,

4 and thereby it is prohibited to presume it can prosecute the undersigned

5 respondent as a private person or person by legal process or quasi-judicial

8 2. Contesting, the facts the States participation in Title IV-D is voluntary to

12 to follow the guidelines under 42 USC Sections 651-669(b) and therefore

8 1 Section 10 of the constitution for the United states of America by

11 immediately demanding payment of support by wage garnishment. For this

18 and cease and desist sending communications.

4 or a member of the United States Uniformed Services and is not subjected

8 required to participate in Title IV-D program for Child Support

15 cease and desist sending communications.

4 The facts presented by the undersigned respondent is proof the court or

4 evidence introduced by the petitioner showing the petitioner has suffered an

8 prosecute the respondent.

11 man, a sovereign23 state citizen,24 and thereby as a sovereign state citizen25

4 as the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin

8 undersigned State-citizen is domiciled and therefore consent is required to

18 11. The man, [TYPE IN YOUR NAME AND REMOVE BRACKETS]

22 a contractual matter and is proof the proceedings for child support

8 cease and desist sending communications.

15 participate in the proceedings for child support enforcement27 established

8 desist sending communications. For this court or tribunal to object to this

15 13.This written response is evidence that the respondent is contesting and

18 State’s participation in Title IV-D program or child support enforcement

4 F. 2d 1558 - Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 1989) and thereby the

15 respondent is contesting the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act

22 cease and desist sending communications.

8 lacks personal jurisdiction to order the undersigned respondent to appear

4 undersigned respondent to appear and thereby must discharge matter and

11 participate in the legal progress for establishment of Paternity and Child

18 matter and cease and desist sending communications.

6 IMMEDIATELY DISCHARGE OR DISMISS THIS MATTER

16 Dated this [day] of [Month], [year].

You might also like