Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • EoMPLS MPLS VPLS

    Uploaded by

    normangon
    93 views1 page
    VPLS is more scalable than EoMPLS and MPLS L3 VPN for layer 2 and layer 3 services respectively. VPLS works well on full mesh topologies while MPLS L3 VPN requires route reflectors. MPLS L3 VPN is more resource intensive for service providers since they must maintain customer routing tables, while VPLS and EoMPLS only require layer 2 switches at customer sites. GETVPN provides the best security and scalability for IPsec VPNs across these technologies.

    Original Description:

    EoMPLS MPLS VPLS Key features and Differences

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    VPLS is more scalable than EoMPLS and MPLS L3 VPN for layer 2 and layer 3 services respectively. VPLS works well on full mesh topologies while MPLS L3 VPN requires route reflectors. MPLS L3 VPN is more resource intensive for service providers since they must maintain customer routing tables, while VPLS and EoMPLS only require layer 2 switches at customer sites. GETVPN provides the best security and scalability for IPsec VPNs across these technologies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    93 views1 page

    EoMPLS MPLS VPLS

    Uploaded by

    normangon
    VPLS is more scalable than EoMPLS and MPLS L3 VPN for layer 2 and layer 3 services respectively. VPLS works well on full mesh topologies while MPLS L3 VPN requires route reflectors. MPLS L3 VPN is more resource intensive for service providers since they must maintain customer routing tables, while VPLS and EoMPLS only require layer 2 switches at customer sites. GETVPN provides the best security and scalability for IPsec VPNs across these technologies.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    orhanergun.

    net EoMPLS VPLS MPLS L3 VPN


    Not scalable compare to VPLS and MPLS Very Scalable architecture for the layer 2
    Scalability for the Customer L3 VPN service Very scalable architecture for the layer 3 service
    Same as EoMPLS if BGP Auto Discovery is
    not used, if BGP AD is used,better than
    Scalability for the Service Provider Not good EoMPLS
    Service Type Carries Layer 2 frames Carries Layer 2 Frames Carries Layer 3 IP packets
    Vey good with the MPBGP VPN Route Reflectors but
    Scalability is very bad for full mesh It works very well for the full mesh RT Constraints should be used to hide unnecessary
    Working on Full Mesh topology topology information from the unintended PE devices
    Works quite well but if the number os
    sites too much, scalability for both Better than EoMPLS for both the Service
    customer and service provider becomes Provider and Customer from the Requires extra configuration on the Service Provider
    Working on Hub and Spoke an issue scalability point of view side but it is doable and commonly used
    Suitable as WAN technology Yes but not scalable Yes it is very scalable Yes it is very scalable
    It is originally designed as Datacenter
    It is suitable but if there are so many Interconnect Technology,it is most It can be used as Layer 3 datacenter interconnect
    sites to interconnect, it's scalability is suitable one among all these three technology but cannot provide layer 2 extension thus
    Suitable as DCI technology not good options not good as DCI
    Who controls the Backbone Routing Customer Customer Service Provider
    Standard Protocol Yes IETF Standard Yes IETF Standard Yes IETF Standard
    Service Provider Stuff Experince Not well known Limited knowledge Well known
    VPLS provides LAN emulation so allows
    layer 2 to be streched over the customer In theory any routing protocol can run as PE-CE but
    All routing protocols can be enabled over locations.Any routing protocol can run most Service Provider only provides BGP and Static
    Routing Protocol Support Ethernet over MPLS Service over VPLS service Routing
    MPLS Traffic Engineering Support Yes Yes Yes
    Service Provider should offer, otherwise Customer
    has to create overlays to carry Multicast traffic,
    Multicast Support Yes Yes that’s why Multicast support may nor be good
    Same as Frame Relay, doesn't provide Same as Frame Relay,doesn't provide Same as Frame Relay,doesn't provide IPSEC by
    Security IPSEC by default IPSEC by default default
    Best technology for IPSEC GETVPN,it provides excellent scalability GETVPN,it provides excellent scalability GETVPN,it provides excellent scalability
    Bad since the PE devices have to keep the routing
    Worst since the PE devices have to keep tables of the customer but since the IP addresses
    Resource Requirement for the Best since the PE devices don't have to all the MAC addresses of the customer can be aggregated, some sites may not need entire
    Service Provider keep the customer MAC addresses and MAC addresses are not aggregatable routing table of the customer
    Resource Requirement for the More, it requires either Layer 3 switch or Router at
    Customer Basic,it requires only layer 2 switch Basic,It requires only layer 2 switch the customer site
    Yes, Service Provider is transparent for Yes,Service Provider is transparent for Yes with 6vPE technology it provides IPv6 supports
    IPv6 Support the IPv4 and IPv6 packets the IPv4 and IPv6 packets for the VPN customers
    With H-VPLS full mesh PW requirement is Route Reflector for the MPBGP sessions between PE
    Hierarchy None avoided devices
    In the core split horizon prevents loop. If OSPF Down Bit,IS-IS Up/Down Bit, EIGRP Site of Origin
    It is only point to point, there is no traffic comes from PW it is not sent back prevents loop when CE is multihomed to the MPLS L3
    Loop Prevention chance to loop to another PW VPN PE

    You might also like