Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Integration of CAD/CAM and Rapid Prototyping in Product Development: A Review
The Integration of CAD/CAM and Rapid Prototyping in Product Development: A Review
com
ScienceDirect
Materials Today: Proceedings 2 (2015) 3438 – 3445
a
Research Scholar,Dept. of MECH,SRKR Engg. College,Bhimavaram,W.G,A.P,India. [email protected], [email protected],
b
Dept. of MECH,SRKR Engg. College,Bhimavaram,W.G,A.P,India.
a,b,
*Dept. of MECH,A.U,Visakhapatnam,A.P-530003,India.
Abstract
Rapid Prototyping and manufacturing (RP&M) technique has shown a high potential to reduce the cycle and cost of product
development. Integrating CAD/CAM RP&M systems have been developed and employed to implement remote parts and
manufacturing for rapid prototyping and improve the capability of rapid product development for a large number of small and
medium sized enterprises. This paper provides a comprehensive review of recent research on CAD/CAM RP&M systems. The
key issues and enabling tools to implement the remote RP&M systems, involve (1) CAD/CAM/CAE, (2) Modelling and
Optimization, (3) Algorithms, (4) Measurement of anisotropic strength, (5) STEP/XML, (6) Applying new technologies and
concepts to Rapid prototyping systems, are described in detail.Finally, this review gives outlook on possible future development
and research direction for CAD/CAM RP&M systems.
© 2014 The Authors. Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Selection andpeer-review
Selection and peer-review under
under responsibility
responsibility ofconference
of the the conference committee
committee members
members of International
of the 4th the 4th International
conferenceconference on
on Materials
Materials
ProcessingProcessing and Characterization.
and Characterization.
1. Main text
Due to the pressure of international competition and marketglobalization in the 21st century, there continues to be
strongdriving forces in industry to compete effectively by reducing time to market and cost while assuring high
quality product andservice [5][3][4].RP is a new forming process which fabricates physical parts layer by layer
under computer controldirectly from 3D CAD models in a very short time. In contrast totraditional machining
methods, the majority of rapid prototypingsystems tend to fabricate parts based on additive manufacturingprocess,
rather than subtraction or removal of material. Therefore,this type of fabrication is unconstrained by the
limitationsattributed to conventional machining approaches [2][6].Additive processes, which generate parts in a
layeredway, have 15 years of history [1].It started in the late 80's with Stereo lithography. Sincethen, many new
ideas have come up, many patents havebeen deposited, new processes were invented andcommercialized, some of
which have alreadydisappeared. An overview is given in Table 1.
Table 1. LM. technologies, acronyms and development years
Name Acronym Development
Years
RP is newly evolving toward rapidtooling (RT). RT is a technique that transforms the RP patterns intofunctional
parts, especially metal or plastic parts. It offers a fast andlow cost method to produce moulds and functional
parts.Furthermore, the integration of both RP and RT in developmentstrategy promotes the implementation of
concurrent engineeringin companies. Numerous processes have been developed forproducing molds from RP
systems. The RT methods can generallybe divided into direct and indirect tooling categories, and also soft(firm) and
hard tooling subgroups. Indirect RT requires some kindsof master patterns, which can be made by conventional
methods(e.g. High-speed Machining, HSM), or more commonly by an RPprocess such as SL or SLS. Direct RT, as
the name suggests, involvesmanufacturing a tool cavity directly on the RP system, henceeliminating the
intermediate step of generating a pattern [7]. Softtooling can be obtained via replication from a positive pattern
ormaster. Soft tooling is associated with low costs; used for low volumeproduction and uses materials that have low
hardnesslevels such as silicones, epoxies, low melting point alloys, etc. [53] RTVsilicone rubber moulds, epoxy
moulds, metal spraying moulds, etc., are some of these typical soft molds. Hard tooling is associatedwith higher
volume of production, and the use of materials ofgreater hardness. Keltool process, Quickcast process, and
theExpress Tool process are some of these hard tooling’s. Electricaldischarge machining (EDM) seems to be an
interesting area inwhich rapid tooling finds a potential application. Some methods ofmaking EDM electrodes based
on RP technique have developedsuch as abrading process, copper electroforming and net shapecasting, etc.
[37][38][39].
The objective of this paper is to present a comprehensive review of recent advances in CAD/CAM RP&M systems,
anddiscuss the future research directions. That may provide areference and direction for the development of CAD
basedRP&M systems.
The major players in this field have already come to theconclusion that a breakthrough can only happen on thebasis
of manufacturing applying the RP technologies ona large scale. New terms were created or considered:terms like
mass customization (MC) by Siemens andPhonak [1] [8] [9], Production on Demand (POD) by Boeing,and recently
Advanced Digital Manufacturing (AMD) by3D Systems.
RM must guarantee long-term consistentcomponent use for the entire product life cycle or for adefined minimal
period for wearing parts. This calls for amost significant role of materials in the LM technologies.The indirect
productionvia patterns and reproduction, by e.g. casting, are notconsidered as LM, even though generative
processeshave a significant ability and importance representing animportant option in those process chains.In
contrast to the previous definition of RapidManufacturing (RM), Rapid Tooling (RT) aims only atlong-term
consistency tools, meaning a tool able to formseveral thousands or even millions of parts before finalwearing-out.
Referring to tooling, mainly plastic injection moulds areconsidered, as these are the most frequently usedforming
tools. Naturally we have to consider as well otherneeds with greater difficulty as in die casting, sheet metalforming
and forging dies [10][11][12][13] [14]. Thoseapplications increase substantially the requirements onthermal and
mechanical load and wear. On the otherhand we have also to consider tooling with lower loadthat is also of great
interest: for example forthermoforming, fibre forming and similar processes [15][16].Fig. 2shows a flowchart
ofdeveloping and manufacturing process for RT basedon the integrated system[22].
3440 A.K. Matta et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2 (2015) 3438 – 3445
In the development of various types of CAD RP&Msystems, a number of key issues have been discussed. Based on
thecurrent research results for CAD RP&M systems, these keyissues can be divided into the following six
categories: (1) CAD/CAM/CAE, (2) Modelling and Optimization, (3) Algorithms, (4) Measurement of anisotropic
strength, (5) STEP/XML, (6) Applying new technologies and concepts to Rapid prototyping systems, are described
in detail.
3.1. CAD/CAM/CAE
STL, which has been a widely adopted data standard in the RP/ M industry, is an approximation representation
scheme of product models based on triangles or quadrilaterals. However, there are some intrinsic problems in STL
files such as gaps, holes, missing/ degenerated/overlapping facets, etc. during the conversion process from native
A.K. Matta et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2 (2015) 3438 – 3445 3441
CAD files. [17–21]. On the other hand, STL is less inaccurate in geometrical representation and needs much more
storage spaces for a complex model than parametric mathematical representation themes such as NURBS, Bezier, B-
Spline, etc. Recently, there are active research and development to introduce parametric mathematical repre-
sentation to better support RP/M. [23-28].
Some of the research successfully adopted parametric representation such as Bezier, B-Spline and NURBS to
improve the geometrical quality of RP/M models. However, a research gap exists between the parametric
representation and the following process planning, and a smart solution is imperative to address the different
geometrical characteristics of complex biomedical models in order to improve the build efficiency and geometrical
accuracy of RP/M.
Fig. 2. Flow chart of developing and manufacturing RT based on the integrated system.
The modelling module allows the designer to interact with the VR model to manipulate the viewing perspective and
the part geometry. This allows the designer to view the model by navigating around it and changing the lighting,
shading and rendering conditions [42-50].
For example Working with the high stress had been observed in the right lift arm of thethree point hitch assembly on
the 8000 Series tractor due to high vertical forces. These stresses onlyoccurred in the right lift arm because the load
that caused the stresses was offset to the right of the center of the tractor. This problem was selected because the
stresses could be analyzed using "finiteelement analysis and because a shape change in the area around the hub (area
of high stress) couldpossibly interfere with the lift cylinder rod. The lift arms are located on the rear of the tractor.
They are cast parts and are the input links ina four bar mechanism that is used to raise and lower equipment that is
mounted to the hitch. Theright and left lift arms are connected to each other via the rockshaft. There are two
hydrauliccylinders, one connected to each lift arm, that apply the force to raise and lower the arms. Lift linksconnect
the lift arms to the draft links where the implement is mounted [51] [52].
3442 A.K. Matta et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2 (2015) 3438 – 3445
In order to make compression test specimens, an ABS material for FDM, azp102 (plaster powder) material for the
3D printer, and an acrylic-hydroxyapatite composite material for NCDS. The dimensions of the
compressionspecimens are according to ASTM D695.In compression tests, build direction was the only examined
processparameter. “axial” (horizontal) and “transverse”(vertical). The raster angles were setas (45◦/−45◦). Note that
(45◦/−45◦) are the default raster angles defined in theQuickslice program. For the 3D printer process, the specimens
were produced in three builddirections—“axial,” “transverse” and “diagonal”. The diagonal specimen’slayers were
assumed to be deposited at a 45◦ slope to the base.[11] [30-33]
3.4. Algorithm
A slicing algorithm is to represent the boundary contour of each sliced layer as a closed NURBS curve to maintain
the representation accuracy of an original model. A mixed tool-path algorithm is to generate contour and zigzag
tool-paths to meet both the geometrical accuracy and build efficiency requirements. The contour tool- paths are used
to fabricate the area along the boundary of each sliced layer to improve the geometrical quality of a product model.
The zigzag tool-paths are used to fabricate the interior area of the model to improve the efficiency. [8] [29].
[6]In Adaptive slicing the first layer obtained from one end with a sufficiently small thickness. Points in this layer
are projected along the RP building direction onto a plane positioned at the component edge. This forms a 2D band
of scattered points. An intuitive method is to use the width of this band as a measure for adaptive slicing. Adaptation
of a thick layer in components with a large curvature variation along the building direction normally results to a
thick scatter band width. It is assumed that a thick band width generally represents a large cusp height and
consequently a large shape-error. A band width tolerance is given to set the maximum allowable deviation between
the generated model and the cloud data points. If the measured maximum band width is smaller than the prescribed
band width tolerance, the layer thickness is adaptively increased. Since the actual shape-error can only be
determined after a layer is constructed, the slicing procedure follows an iterative process. In this respect,
construction-check- reconstruction procedure is performed until a suitable band width tolerance compatible with a
satisfactory shape-error is achieved.
In DSP algorithms designed usingMATLAB (version 6) Simulink DSP block sets implemented in real-time through
RTW.RTW generates C code from the graphical block sets throughthe Target Language Compiler (TLC) [14].
Together withother supporting files, the codes are compiled, assembledand linked automatically using TI
TMS320C6000 codegeneration tools and GMAKE utility. The executablecode is then downloaded to the
TMS320C6701-EVM forreal-time signal processing. The rapid prototyping processcan be summarized into three
processes:
(1) Code generation process;
(2) Executable code building process; and
(3) Executable code downloading process.
3.5. STEP/XML
The key function in the structure of this layer is the data storage and retrieval based on STEP based data
modelstandard. STEP standard has data protocols on which the structure ofproduct data-form its design information
and data related to its production process data is organized. The structure thathas been used for implementing this
standard was based onthe integrity of product data [40]. The STEP data model iscomposed of substructures called
Application Protocols (APs). These APs include definitions not only of typicalgeometry and drafting elements, but
also of data types andprocesses for specific industries such as automotive, aerospace, shipbuilding, electronics, plant
construction, and maintenance [13][41]. Considering the INFELT STEP platformto support CAD/CAPP/CAM
processes and CNC machiningefforts, the following Application protocols are used inIntegration layer:[34-39]
1. Configuration controlled design
2. Functional data and schematic representationfor process plans
3. Core data for automotive mechanical designprocesses
4. Mechanical product definition for processplanning
5. Material information for products
6. integrated CNC machining
A.K. Matta et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2 (2015) 3438 – 3445 3443
3D printer builds parts in layers. From the model data of STL, and slicing algorithm generated with
detailedinformation for every layer. First, a layer of powder is spreadover the machine bed. The component slice is
then formed byink jets which selectively inject a binder into the material to forma green part. A piston lowers the
part, the next powder layeris spread and the binder is printed again. This layer-by-layerprocess repeats until the part
is completed. Following a post process,unbound powder is removed, leaving the fabricatedpart. TheNano composite
deposition system (NCDS)uses polymer resins as matrix and various nanoparticles to form composite materials, and
consists of depositionmechanism and material removal process of “mechanical micromachining” .The nano
composite deposited into 10–100_m thin layersto form a near-net-shape. By repeating the depositionand machining
for each layer, final three-dimensional part will obtain.
4. Conclusions
CAD/CAM and Rapid prototyping have thepotential to further improve the traditional manufacturing andservice;
moreover, they will become more and moreimportant for current manufacturing industry. CAD-basedRP&M
systems have been developed and employed to implementremote products and manufacturing for rapid prototyping,
enhancethe availability of RP&M facilities and improve the capability ofrapid product development for a large
number of small andmedium sized enterprises. This paper reviews the state-of-the-artin CAD-based RP&M systems.
The future improvement tasks forthe systems should further focus on the followingaspects: In a collaborative
environment, the integration andinteroperability can enhance the competitive advantages of RP service. Therefore,
the integration and interoperabilityin CAD-based RP&M systems is an important issue. CAD servicesrepresent a
step forward in enabling collaborations betweenvarious entities on the design and in overcoming the scaling
problems that may appear. CAD services technique mayprovide a solution for this issue. Some new technologies
and concepts such as, STEP, XML; provide effective enabling tools for software-basedapplication systems. Future
research and development on CAD-based RP&M systems should be based on these new
technologies and concepts, in particular 3Dprinting, NCDS.Further research will be focused on concurrent process
for RP and RT, optimizingexternal manufacturing resources. CAD-based design and manufacturing system is a new
productmode in term of mission, structure, infrastructure, capabilities, anddesign process. The significant
contribution of this paper is to present acomprehensive review of recent advances in CAD-based RP&Msystems,
and discuss the future research directions. That mayprovide a reference and direction for the development of CAD
basedRP&M systems. AlthoughCAD-based technologies have been applied tocollaborative product design and
manufacturing for many years, real industrial applications have not been in place yet. As one of themost typical
cases for CAD-based collaborative product design andmanufacturing system, CAD-based RP&M system has shown
a promising prospect for manufacturing. However, there is still a long way for really commercialapplication of the
CAD-based RP&M systems.
References
1. Gideon N. Levy1, Ralf Schindel2, J.P. Kruth2, “Rapid Manufacturing And Rapid Tooling With Layer Manufacturing (Lm)
Technologies, State Of The Art And Future Perspectives”.
2. J.C. Ferreira, “Manufacturing core-boxes for foundry with rapid tooling technology”, elsiever, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology 155–156 (2004) 1118–1123.
3. S.H. Choi,” A virtual prototyping system for rapid product development,”elseiver, Computer-Aided Design 36 (2004) 401–412.
4. Anthony Anjorin,” Model-driven rapid prototyping with programmed graph transformations” elseiver, Journal
ofVisualLanguagesandComputing24(2013)441–462.
5. Hongbo Lan, “Web-based rapid prototyping and manufacturing systems: A review”, elseiver,computers in industry 60 (2009) 643-
656.
6. YuMing Zhang, “Weld deposition-based rapid prototyping: a preliminary study” , elseiver, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology 135 (2003) 347–357
7. F. Xu, “Toward Generic Models for Comparative Evaluation and Process Selection in Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing” ,journal
of manufacturing systems, vol.19/No.5,2000 pp283-296.
8. G.Q. Jin, “An adaptive process planning approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated
Manufacturing 29 (2013) 23–38.
3444 A.K. Matta et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2 (2015) 3438 – 3445
9. 9. W.K. Chiu, “Multiple material objects: from CAD representation to data format for rapid prototyping” ,elseiver, Computer-Aided
Design 32 (2000) 707–717.
10. F. Javidrad, “Contour curve reconstruction from cloud data for rapid prototyping “ ,elseiver, Robotics and Computer -Integrated
Manufacturing 27 (2011) 397–404.
11. C.S. Lee, “Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts” , elseiver, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology 187–188 (2007) 627–630.
12. G.Q. Jin, “Adaptive tool-path generation of rapid prototyping for complex product models “ ,elseiver, Journal of Manufacturing
Systems 30 (2011) 154–164.
13. A.Balakrishna, “Integration of CAD/CAM/CAE in product development system using STEP/XML” , Sage Journal, Concurrent
Engineering June 2006 14: 121-128.
14. K.H. Hong, “Rapid prototyping of DSP algorithms on VLIW TMS320C6701 DSP”, elseiver, Microprocessors and Microsystems 26
(2002) 311–324.
15. Pranjal Jain, “Feasibility Study of manufacturing using rapid prototyping: FDM Approach” MESIC 2013, Procedia Engineeri ng 63 (
2013 ) 4 – 11.
16. A. Budding, “Open source powder based rapid prototyping machine for ceramics”, elseiver, Procedia CIRP 6 ( 2013 ) 533 – 538
17. S.H. Choi, “A versatile virtual prototyping system for rapid product development” , elseiver, Computers in Industry 59 (2008) 477–
488.
18. Chao Feng, “Heat transfer analysis of rapid ice prototyping process by finite element method”, elseiver, Materials and Design 28
(2007) 921–927
19. István Németh, “3D Design Support for Rapid Virtual Prototyping of Manufacturing Systems”, elseiver, Procedia CIRP 7 ( 2013 ) 431
– 436
20. Qingbin Liu, “Experimental study on the ice pattern fabrication for the investment casting by rapid freeze prototyping (RFP)”,
elseiver, computers in industry, 48 (2002) 181-197.
21. M.J.Pratt, “Progress towards an international standard for data transfer in rapid prototyping and layered manufacturing”
,elseiver,computer-aided design 34(2002) 1111-1121.
22. Yucheng Ding, “An integrated manufacturing system for rapid tooling based on rapid prototyping” , elseiver, Robotics and Computer-
Integrated Manufacturing 20 (2004) 281–288.
23. S.H.Choi, “Modelling and optimization of Rapid Prototyping”, elseiver, computers in industry 47 (2002) 39-53.
24. K.H. Hong, “An integrated environment for rapid prototyping of DSP Algorithms using matlab and Texas instruments’ TMS320C30”,
elseiver, Microprocessors and Microsystems 24 (2000) 349–363
25. Karl Kuzman, “ The integration of rapid prototyping and CAE in mould manufacturing” ,elseiver, Journal Material processing
technology 111 (2001) 279-285.
26. Yin Zhongwei, Methodologies in discrete patches Filling in Reverse Engineering and Rapid Prototyping ” ,JMS Vol.23.No.5 2004.
27. Ying-Ping Qian, “Direct rapid high-temperature alloy prototyping by hybrid plasma-laser technology ” , elseiver, Journal Material
processing technology208 (2008) 99-104.
28. Dr.D.Ranga Raju, “An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components ” , IJET 1 (2)
106-111(2010).
29. Yucheng Ding, “An integrated manufacturing system for rapid tooling based on rapid prototyping” , elseiver, RCIM20(2004) 281-
288.
30. Yih-Lin Cheng, “Fabrication of meso-scale underwater vehicle components by rapid prototyping process” , journal of materials
processing technology 201 (2008) 640–644.
31. M. Oudjene, “Towards the three-dimensional FE analysis of rapid prototyping tools for sheet metal stamping process” , elseiver,
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 43 (2007) 611 – 619.
32. Pan Haipeng, “Generation and optimization of slice profile data in rapid prototyping and manufacturing” , elseiver, Journal of
Materials Processing Technology 187–188 (2007) 623–626.
33. Andrea Bonarini,, “R2P: An open source hardware and software modular approach to robot prototyping” , elseiver, Robotics and
Automation systems 62 (2014) 1073–1084.
34. J. Czyz˙ ewski, “Rapid prototyping of electrically conductive components using 3D printing technology” , elseiver,Journal of
Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009) 5281–5285.
35. Allan E.W. Rennie, “Electroforming of rapid prototyping mandrels for electro-discharge machining electrodes” , elseiver, Journal of
Materials Processing Technology 110 (2001) 186-196.
36. Frédéric Gillot, “Dimensional accuracy studies of copper shells used for electro-discharge machining electrodes made with rapid
prototyping and the electroforming process” , elseiver, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 159 (2005) 33–39.
37. Yiping Tang, “A new technique for the fabrication of graphite EDM electrodes” , elseiver, Journal of Materials Processing
Technology 166 (2005) 199–204.
38. Yong-Ak Song, “Experimental investigations into rapid prototyping of composites by novel hybrid deposition process” , elseiver,
Journal of Materials Processing Technology 171 (2006) 35–40.
39. M. Monz´on, “Validation of electrical discharge machining electrodes made with rapid tooling technologies” , elseiver, journal of
materials processing technology 1 9 6 ( 2 0 0 8 ) 109–114.
40. Omid Fatahi Valilai, “INFELT STEP: An Integrated and Interoperable Platform for Collaborative CAD/CAPP/CAM/CNC Machining
Systems based on STEP Standard”, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2010 Vol II WCECS
2010, October 20-22, 2010, San Francisco, USA.
41. Y.F. Wu, “Modelling cloud data using an adaptive slicing approach” , Elsevier, Computer-Aided Design 36 (2004) 231–240.
42. Kun Tong, “Software compensation of rapid prototyping machines” , Elsevier, Precision Engineering 28 (2004) 280–292.
43. Hong-Seok Byun, “Determination of the optimal build direction for different rapid prototyping processes using multi-criterion
decision making” , Elsevier, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 22 (2006) 69–80.
44. Carlo H. Se´quin, “CAD tools for aesthetic engineering” , Elsevier, Computer-Aided Design 37 (2005) 737–750.
45. Ho-Chan Kim, “Reduction of post-processing for stereolithography systems by fabrication-direction optimization” , Elsevier,
Computer-Aided Design 37 (2005) 711–725.
A.K. Matta et al. / Materials Today: Proceedings 2 (2015) 3438 – 3445 3445
46. S.H. Choi, “A versatile virtual prototyping system for rapid product development” , Elsevier, Computers in Industry 59 (2008) 477–
488
47. Ratnadeep Paul, “Optimal part orientation in Rapid Manufacturing process for achieving geometric tolerances” , Elsevier, Journal of
Manufacturing Systems 30 (2011) 214– 222.
48. Mircea Anca˘u, “The computation of Pareto-optimal set in multicriterial optimization of rapid prototyping processes” , Elsevier,
Computers & Industrial Engineering 58 (2010) 696–708.
49. Sreenathbabu Akula, “Hybrid adaptive layer manufacturing: An Intelligent art of direct metal rapid tooling process” , Elsevier,
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 22 (2006) 113–123.
50. Johan J. Broek, “Free-form thick layer object manufacturing technology for large-sized physical models” , Elsevier, Automation in
Construction 11 (2002) 335– 347.
51. Michael J. Ryken, “Applying virtual reality techniques to the interactive stress analysis of a tractor lift arm” , Elsevier, Finite Elements
in Analysis and Design 35 (2000) 141-155.
52. Gerard Ryder, “Rapid design and manufacture tools in architecture” , Elsevier, Automation in Construction 11 (2002) 279– 290.
53. A.K.Matta, “Preparation and characterization of Biodegradable PLA/PCL polymeric Blends”, elseiver, procedia material science 6
(2014) pp.1266-1270.