Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis of Coarse Aggregate Performance Based On The Modified Micro Deval Abrasion Test
Analysis of Coarse Aggregate Performance Based On The Modified Micro Deval Abrasion Test
net/publication/320426255
CITATION READS
1 220
6 authors, including:
Haocheng Xiong
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
14 PUBLICATIONS 91 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
• Influence of aggregate morphology and grading on the performance of small-size SMA mixtures View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Meng Guo on 01 March 2019.
ScienceDirect
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194
www.elsevier.com/locate/IJPRT
Received 9 September 2016; received in revised form 13 June 2017; accepted 12 October 2017
Available online 16 October 2017
Abstract
The anti-abrasion property of aggregate significantly affects the performance of the pavement. In this research, the quartzite and
gneiss which were produced in Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province were selected as test samples. According to the American
Society for Testing and Materials standard, the Micro-Deval abrasion test was taken every 1000 rotation times until 20,000 times, and
the change trend of the Micro-Deval abrasion value was obtained. Results showed that the abrasion values were in the exponential
growth rate rather than linear rate. Their R-Square coefficient was 0.99142 and 0.99916 respectively. The gravel information such as area,
roundness, diameter, perimeter and so on were calculated and analyzed by Image-Pro Plus software, which provided a rapid way for the
2D morphology characteristics analysis of the coarse aggregate.
Ó 2018 Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Micro-Deval abrasion test; Coarse aggregate; Anti-abrasion property; Abrasion values
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.10.007
1996-6814/Ó 2018 Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
186 J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194
Communications of the PRC, coarse aggregate referred to the modified Deval test. It showed that there was a close
gravel, crushed gravel, screening gravel, slag and so on. relationship between the main mineral composition and
The particle size was greater than 2.36 mm in the asphalt the wear resistance of the rock [7]. Wang et al. (2015)
mixture. The researchers in different countries used differ- selected 48 particles from each type of aggregate and used
ent technical indexes and test methods to measure abrasion the Aggregate Imaging System (AIMS) and X-ray Com-
value, such as Deval abrasion method, Los Angeles abra- puted Tomography (XCT) equipment to capture the
sion method and Dorry integrate test. Due to the impact changes in their morphological characteristics, including
value, Dorian abrasion value and Los Angeles abrasion sphericity, angularity and texture, established a correlation
value had a strong correlation, the coarse aggregate abra- between the Micro-Deval test results and their morpholog-
sion value was widely used in China as one of the most ical properties for 11 different aggregates [8]. Ivan Deiros
important mechanical indexes of road building and design- et al. (2016) adopted discrete element method (DEM) sim-
ing, to reflect the rutting resistance, abrasion resistance and ulations of Micro-Deval attrition test to detect the different
durability of asphalt concrete pavement. However, this loading and wearing mechanisms and quantify the amount
method had its own defects when the Los Angeles abrasion of friction work [9].
value was only used in the test. Los Angeles abrasion test Thus, Micro-Deval abrasion test had its own advantages
obtained aggregate abrasion value in dry condition consid- in the measurement of anti-abrasion property of aggregate.
ering the impact of steel ball and the aggregate. It could It could distinguish aggregate performance in the moistur-
identify the property of impact resistance, edge shear and ized condition better. It was helpful to better evaluate the
friction resistance, rather than pure abrasion [3]. The abra- material service performance in the practical application
sion mode couldn’t truly reflect the abrasion resistance such as road engineering, civil engineering and so on.
ability of aggregate. It could indirectly reflect the abrasion According to the standard of American Society for Testing
effect between tires and pavement. The dry condition was and Materials (ASTM), we adopted modified Micro-Deval
not consistent with the actual environment of the aggre- abrasion test and analyzed the anti-abrasion performance
gate. It had been proved that water was one of the main of aggregate in moisturized condition, and obtained the
reasons for the failure of asphalt concrete pavement. Water shape characteristics of gravel and sand. It provided a
could invade the interface between aggregate and asphalt new method to analyze the aggregate’s physical properties
which led to the loss of adhesion and the loss of asphalt and morphological characteristics.
concrete pavement [4]. It was difficult to avoid water during
the pavement service due to the rain soaked, snow and ice
melt and so on. Thus, it was necessary to conduct research 2. The principle and process of Micro-Deval abrasion test
on the anti-friction performance of aggregate in moistur-
ized condition. Micro-Deval abrasion test was a method to measure the
There were different test conditions and results between gravel durability which was proposed in the 1960s in
Micro-Deval abrasion test and Los Angeles abrasion test France. It evaluated the anti-abrasion resistance and dura-
although they were both abrasion tests. It meant that they bility of aggregate by measuring the mass change in the
couldn’t replace each other and needed to be selectively aggregate using steel ball in water. Many aggregates could
used in a certain range [3]. Compared to the Test Methods be scuffed easily in a moisturized condition than in a dry
of Aggregate for Highway Engineering (JTJ 058-2000), the condition. Compared to other tests (such as the Los Ange-
biggest difference in ASTM D6928-10 was the moisturized les abrasion test), it could reflect the anti-abrasion perfor-
environment of aggregate abrasion testing. Compared to mance of aggregate better and had a higher
several other measurements of aggregate performance test, discrimination. It could also simulate the physical weather-
Micro-Deval abrasion test could better reflect the anti- ing process of rocks in moisturized condition.
abrasion properties of gravel which could be used to study In this research, the Micro-Deval abrasion testing
the properties of some rocks that have been weakened in machine was chosen to do the test according to the stan-
the moisturized condition. Richard et al. (1997) considered dard of ASTM D6928-10 [10], as shown in Fig. 1. The steel
that Los Angeles abrasion test was not very good to distin- ball was used to abrade the aggregate, and the diameter of
guish the materials because it was easily broken in moistur- each ball was 10.0 mm and its mass was 4.15 g. Before
ized condition and cannot establish a good relationship experiments, the selected gravel was put into water for 1
with the service performance of the aggregate. But the h, then the soaked rock, 2 L water and 5000 g steel ball
Deval abrasion test can distinguish properly aggregates were put together in the jars, rotating at the speed of 30–
[5]. Cooley et al. (2002) described the durability of stone 33 rpm. A test measurement was taken every 1000 rotation
according to Deval abrasion test results, and found that times. After the test was completed, the steel balls were
this test can distinguish different kinds of rocks efficiently removed from the aggregates immediately by moisturized
even though they had the same performance. Their test method without losing any material, filtering out the grav-
results were different due to the different mineral composi- els whose grain size was smaller than 1.18 mm. The gravels
tion [6]. Takarli (2009) got the relationship between the were dried in the convection oven at a constant tempera-
wear coefficient and mineral composition of rock using ture of 105 ± 5 °C until a constant quality was obtained.
J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194 187
The change in aggregate quality, shape, and particle size and 12.5–9.5 mm, and the qualities were about 375 g,
was analyzed. 375 g and 750 g respectively. The gravel samples were dried
According to the actual condition and monitoring in the convection oven at a constant temperature 105 ± 5 °C
results of the laboratory, the indoor temperature was kept for 2 h until the difference between two measured values
at more than 20 °C. During the test, the water temperature was less than 1‰. It meant that gravels had been com-
was at the range of 18.0 °C–20.0 °C. 2 L water temperature pletely dried and the mass of sample would not change
was kept at the range of 20.0 °C–25.0 °C, and the air tem- any more. The mass changes in gravel aggregates are
perature was at 22.0 °C–29.0 °C. The relative humidity was shown in Table 1.
below 30% RH, all testing conditions met the Micro-Deval It could be seen from Table 1 that quartzite aggregates
abrasion test requirements. have strong water absorption ability. It also showed that
The calculation formula of the Micro-Deval abrasion rock soaking was necessary before the test which ensured
[10] value is shown in formula (1) with the accuracy of that the gravel aggregate can be fully moisturized. In the
0.001%, in which m0 was the aggregate quality before test- process of cleaning, it absorbed a lot of water. Drying for
ing, and m1 was the aggregate quality after testing. 2 h cannot achieve a constant mass, and the rock mass loss
m1 mo ratio was more than 0.1%. After 4 h drying, the mass of the
Micro-Deval abrasion loss ¼ 100 ð1Þ aggregates reached a steady state. It could be considered
mo
that the aggregates reach a steady state after 4 h drying
at 105 ± 5 °C which can improve the work efficiency.
3. Sample preparation for the modified Micro-Deval More than 30% aggregate particles were chosen as rep-
abrasion test resentative samples for CT scanning test, XRD test and
so on, which were useful to recognize the aggregate proper-
The gravel aggregates of quartzite and gneiss were used ties better, as shown in Table 2. The 37.51% quartzite and
as test material in the research which came from Lincheng 36.867% gneiss aggregate were selected as the sample. In
County in Hebei Province and crushed by Jaw Crusher. order to reflect the characteristics of the whole batch of
According to ASTM D6928-10, aggregates were sieved rock samples, ‘‘III” was chosen to represent the aggregates
by standard sieve and measured by electronic balance of 19.0–16.0 mm particle size, ‘‘II” represents the aggre-
WT50001KF (5000 g/0.1 g). Three groups of aggregates gates of 16.0–12.5 mm particle size, ‘‘I” represents the
were obtained. Their sizes were 19–16 mm, 16–12.5 mm aggregates of 12.5–9.5 mm particle size, as shown in Table 2
Table 1
Aggregates quality of quartzite and gneiss sample.
No. Particle size (mm) Moisturized weight (g) Aggregates’ weight after 2 h drying Constant mass (g)
1 st time Percentage loss (%) 2nd time Percentage loss (%)
1–1 19–16 377.2 375.3 0.769 374.3 0 374.3
1–2 16–12.5 378.1 374.7 0.899 374.7 0 374.7
1–3 12.5–9.5 760.2 749.3 1.434 749.0 0.040 749.0
Subtotal 1 1515.5 1498.3 1.135 1498.0 0.020 1498.0
2–1 19–16 375.9 373.5 0.639 373.3 0.0535 373.3
2–2 16–12.5 379.6 374.0 1.475 373.9 0.0267 373.9
2–3 12.5–9.5 756.7 746.7 1.322 746.5 0.0268 746.5
Subtotal 2 1512.2 1494.2 1.190 1493.7 0.0335 1493.7
188 J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194
Table 2
Selection of quartzite aggregate and gneiss samples.
Sample Number Particle size (mm) Selected number Total number Selection ratio (%) Selected quality (g) Total mass (g) Mass ratio (%)
1–1 19–16 26 61 42.623 158.2 374.3 42.266
1–2 16–12.5 35 71 49.296 188.8 374.7 50.387
1–3 12.5–9.5 87 310 28.065 214.9 749.0 28.692
Subtotal 1 148 442 33.484 561.9 1498.0 37.510
2–1 19–16 16 41 39.024 161.4 373.3 43.236
2–2 16–12.5 30 87 34.483 135.5 373.9 36.240
2–3 12.5–9.5 95 303 31.353 252.3 746.5 33.798
Subtotal 2 141 431 32.715 549.2 1493.7 36.768
Table 3
Abrasion value of quartzite obtained by modified Micro-Deval test.
Rotation Mass after Mass after 2nd Abrasion value Rotation Mass after Mass after 2nd Abrasion value
times rotation drying (%) times rotation drying (%)
0 1515.5 1498.0 0.000 11,000 1479.0 1453.2 2.991
1000 1517.0 1489.0 0.601 12,000 1472.2 1450.7 3.158
2000 1515.0 1485.0 0.868 13,000 1467.0 1447.4 3.378
3000 1507.0 1477.0 1.402 14,000 1469.7 1445.4 3.511
4000 1493.4 1469.4 1.909 15,000 1465.1 1443.4 3.645
5000 1496.2 1469.0 1.936 16,000 1468.5 1438.5 3.972
6000 1495.1 1466.9 2.076 17,000 1457.2 1438.0 4.005
7000 1494.2 1463.9 2.276 18,000 1458.7 1437.8 4.019
8000 1493.6 1460.9 2.477 19,000 1463.2 1436.2 4.126
9000 1488.0 1456.5 2.770 20,000 1460.7 1433.9 4.279
10,000 1491.5 1455.9 2.810
J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194 189
Table 4
Abrasion value of gneiss obtained by modified Micro-Deval test.
Rotation Mass after Mass after 2nd Abrasion value Rotation Mass after Mass after 2nd Abrasion value
times rotation drying (%) times rotation drying (%)
0 1513.6 1495.0 0.000 11,000 1376.1 1336.5 10.602
1000 1491.7 1465.5 1.973 12,000 1363.1 1326.2 11.291
2000 1475.6 1447.0 3.211 13,000 1348.3 1315.4 12.013
3000 1471.0 1430.2 4.334 14,000 1334.4 1303.9 12.783
4000 1453.1 1417.5 5.184 15,000 1321.2 1294.2 13.431
5000 1445.1 1402.8 6.167 16,000 1316.9 1283.8 14.127
6000 1438.8 1394.7 6.709 17,000 1304.8 1273.4 14.823
7000 1423.0 1383.2 7.478 18,000 1289.9 1264.6 15.411
8000 1405.4 1370.6 8.321 19,000 1287.1 1255.4 16.027
9000 1495.3 1360.2 9.017 20,000 1271.9 1245.8 16.669
10,000 1382.6 1347.9 9.839
Table 5
Fitting results of modified Micro-Deval abrasion value by Origin.
Aggregate Index
a b R-Square (COD) Adj. R-Square
Quartzite 0.01118 0.60209 0.99142 0.99094
Gneiss 0.01122 0.73707 0.99916 0.99912
Fig. 3. Abrasion value of aggregates obtained by modified Micro-Deval 4.3. Difference analysis of different Micro-Deval abrasion
test.
test result
change in aggregate particle size and total mass of quartzite This study referred to the Micro-Deval abrasion test
at 20,000 rotation times. In the process of the first 10 000 standard from American Society Testing and Materials
times rotation, totally 18 aggregates with a diameter of and Testing methods of aggregate for highway engineering
19–16 mm rock decreased to a diameter of 16–12.5 mm. (JTJ 058-2000) [19] in China. Because the differences
During the rotation of the 10 000 to 15 000 times, the existed in the test specification which was performed, it
12.5–9.5 mm diameter aggregates changed the most signif- caused the inconsistency of some test conditions, which
icantly, with a total of 9 aggregates decreasing to less than mainly involved the following aspects:
9.5 mm. By the rotation of 15,000 times, the particle size of
the aggregates did not change, remaining constant, but the 1) The different revolution of equipment. The ASTM
total mass of the rocks continued to decrease. D6928-10 standard specified the revolution of
The reasons for different particle size changed might be Micro-Deval abrasion tester was 100 ± 5 rpm, but it
as follows: 1) the size of contact area, 19–16 mm diameter just arrived 30–33 rpm for Chinese test equipment,
rocks had a larger specific surface area contacting with the which caused large differences among the abrasion
steel ball, resulting in a faster abrasion; 2) the shape distri- value of aggregates;
bution of the particle itself, the aggregates with the diame- 2) A different size of mesh screen was used to calculate
ter close to 16 mm, 12.5 mm, 9.5 mm had significant size the amount of sieve residue. The ASTM D6928-10
changes after abrasion test; 3) collisions between steel balls standard specified to use the 4.75 mm and 1.18 mm
and rocks led to the fracture and broken of the aggregate, square hole sieve; Testing methods of aggregate for
which reduced the aggregates’ size. highway engineering (JTJ 058-2000) used 2 mm
In the process of statistics, we also found the phe- round hole sieve, and a different amount of sieve resi-
nomenon of aggregate fracture. After 6000 rotation times, due caused a different value of abrasion. In this
190 J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194
Table 6
Referenced Micro-Deval Limits for Aggregate Applications.
Application Maximum Micro-Deval
Abrasion Loss (%)
Granular sub-base 30
Granular base 25
Open graded base course 17
Structural Concrete 17 21
Concrete Pavement 13
Asphalt concrete base course and 21
secondary road surface course
Asphalt concrete surface course 17 18
Fig. 5. Changes in aggregates particle size and total quality under different revolutions.
J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194 191
Table 7
Analysis results of gravel and sand using Image-Pro Plus (unit: pixels).
No. Grain size No. Area Aspect Diameter (max) Perimeter Roundness Feret (max)
1 9.5–6.3 mm 1 110.739 2.014 17.026 42.367 1.290 17.068
2 77.708 1.607 12.509 33.807 1.170 12.512
3 69.354 1.959 13.608 34.056 1.331 13.699
4 65.719 1.227 10.575 30.234 1.107 10.779
5 102.931 1.518 14.725 38.832 1.166 14.975
6 53.705 1.317 9.852 27.189 1.095 9.869
Average value 80.026 1.607 13.049 34.414 1.193 13.150
2 6.3–4.75 mm 1 43.485 1.287 8.622 25.496 1.190 9.264
2 37.492 1.101 7.568 22.484 1.073 7.600
3 32.814 1.651 8.246 22.188 1.194 8.541
4 36.579 1.362 8.150 23.259 1.177 8.182
5 61.742 1.636 11.623 30.700 1.215 11.633
Average value 42.422 1.407 8.842 24.825 1.170 9.044
3 4.75–2.36 mm 1 10.875 1.497 4.663 12.297 1.106 4.659
2 33.768 1.250 7.807 21.740 1.114 7.907
3 23.539 1.802 7.079 18.514 1.159 7.119
4 10.476 1.022 3.832 11.731 1.045 3.861
5 23.649 1.594 6.975 18.939 1.207 7.094
6 6.532 1.272 3.563 9.492 1.098 3.585
7 19.773 1.759 6.885 17.041 1.169 6.948
8 6.028 1.267 3.016 8.902 1.046 3.098
9 25.728 1.370 6.800 18.675 1.079 6.815
10 16.980 1.435 5.510 15.351 1.104 5.547
11 10.027 1.097 3.961 11.488 1.047 3.961
12 15.805 1.981 6.344 15.624 1.229 6.390
13 14.877 1.501 5.288 14.458 1.118 5.382
14 6.453 1.708 3.597 9.937 1.218 3.859
15 20.704 1.273 5.870 16.945 1.104 5.992
16 8.363 1.370 3.812 10.720 1.094 3.857
17 10.744 1.442 4.400 12.042 1.074 4.426
18 15.588 2.045 6.382 15.613 1.244 6.398
19 32.519 1.292 7.264 20.819 1.061 7.281
Average value 16.444 1.472 5.424 14.754 1.122 5.483
4 2.36–2 mm 1 6.696 1.516 3.707 9.707 1.120 3.731
2 7.923 1.699 4.041 10.842 1.181 4.099
Average value 7.31 1.608 3.874 10.275 1.151 3.915
5 2–1.18 mm 1 2.196 1.168 1.913 5.361 1.041 1.913
2 2.637 1.300 2.130 5.930 1.061 2.151
3 1.853 1.421 1.884 4.966 1.059 1.898
Average value 2.229 1.296 1.976 5.419 1.054 1.987
2.36–2 mm, 2–1.18 mm according to the particle size of with irregular tool, and the gravel particles were chosen as
gravel. A camera equipment was used to take photos after the analysis object. Fig. 8 is a group of different size gravel
weighing. The gravel image region was extracted and images generated by Micro-Deval abrasion test after
measurement data were generated, and the gravel proper- 40,000 rotation times. The analysis results obtained by
ties were obtained, such as area, perimeter, diameter, IPP software are shown in Table 7.
roundness, aspect ratio, the longest distance, shortest Through the analysis of IPP software, the information
distance and other relevant information, as shown in of different sand group was obtained. The feret was the
Fig. 8. longest caliper length of the gravel. The change in max
Before measuring the aggregate, calibration function of diameter was similar to the max feret, although their values
the measure in IPP software was first used to do scale cal- had little difference. As the particle group size decreases, all
ibration for the image. The ruler label position was moved the indicators decrease and tend to the zero point, as shown
to coincide with the original position of the ruler scale 1 in Fig. 9. It is seen from the test results that the aggregate
cm, set mm as the length unit, and then the conversion rela- performance by Micro-Deval test is very important for the
tionship of pixels and the length of the unit can be characterization of such materials, considering that the
obtained: pixels/unit = 18.304. Secondly, the AOI (area pavement performance can be tested by other approaches
of interest) functions in IPP software was used to combine [21,22].
J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194 193
Acknowledgements
6. Conclusions [1] B. Wen, D.W. Cao, Statistical analysis of traffic accident and skid-
resistance of expressway pavement, J. Highway. Transp. Res. Dev. 23
(8) (2006) 72–75.
The modified Micro-Deval abrasion test could better [2] Profession Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Testing
reflect the anti-abrasion properties of gravel aggregate, methods of aggregate for highway engineering (JTG E42–2005),
and evaluated their performance in the moisturized condi- People Traffic Press, Peking, 2005.
tion with a higher distinction degree. Different countries [3] Q.X. Cheng, Discussion on abrasion test method of coarse aggregate,
have different Micro-Deval abrasion test standards and Sci. Technol. Inf. 07 (2011) 116.
[4] J.L. Zhang, M.C. He, Discussion on the causes of asphalt concrete
conditions such as revolutions of equipment, steel and jar pavement loose damage and preventive measures, Highway 10 (2009)
specifications and so on. They led to the differences in mea- 225–227.
sured abrasion values. In this paper, ASTM standard was [5] J.A. Richard, J.R. Scarlett, A review and evaluation of the Micro-
chosen to the Micro-Deval test, the following conclusions Deval test, Report ATR-024, Public Works and Government
could be drawn from this research: Services, Canada, 1997.
[6] L.A. Cooley Jr, M.S. Hunter, R.H. James, Micro-Deval testing of
aggregates in the southeast. NCAT Report 02-09, 2002.
1) The abrasion values of quartzite and gneiss were in [7] M. Takarli, A. Phelipot-Mardele, W. Prince, Adaptation of the
line with the power curve growth rather than increase Micro-Deval test for assessing the surface weathering degree of
linearly with the increase in rotation times. The mean granite, J. ASTM Int. 6 (9) (2009) 1–11.
[8] D.W. Wang, H.N. Wang, Y. Bu, Christian Schulze, Markus Oeser,
square errors were 0.99142 and 0.99916 respectively.
Evaluation of aggregate resistance to wear with micro-deval test in
According to the fitting curve equation, the abrasion combination with aggregate imaging techniques, Wear (2015), 338-
performance of the aggregate could be predicted at 339, 288-296.
any rotation times. The rules could be used to guide [9] Ivan Deiros, Charles Voivret, Gaël Combe, Fabrice Emeriault,
Micro-Deval abrasion testing of the actual operation, Quantifying Degradation of Railway Ballast using Numerical Sim-
simplify the operation process, and reduced the ulations of Micro-Deval Test and In-situ Conditions, Advances in
Transportation Geotechnics 3. The 3rd International Conference on
equipment cost, which was better to show the anti- Transportation Geotechnics (ICTG 2016), vol. 143, 2016, pp. 1016–
abrasion property of aggregates. It could guide the 1023.
actual selection and application of gravel aggregate [10] American Society for Testing and Materials. Standard Test Method
in road engineering. for Resistance of Coarse Aggregate to Degradation by Abrasion in
2) The Image-Pro Plus software was used to analyze the Micro-Deval Apparatus (D6928-10).
[11] C. Rogers, Canadian Experience with the Micro-Deval Test for
aggregate images in the Micro-Deval test which could Aggregates, in: J.P. Latham (Ed.), Advances in Aggregates and
get the aggregate shape, area, roundness, size Armourstone Evaluation, vol. 13, Geological Society, London,
(length), size (width), perimeter and other relevant Engineering Geology Special Publications, 1998, pp. 139–147.
information. It provided a rapid way to analyze the [12] A.P. Lang, P.H. Range, D.W. Fowler, J.J. Allen, Prediction of coarse
aggregate performance by Micro-Deval and other soundness,
2D morphology characteristics of the coarse
strength, and intrinsic particle property tests transportation research
aggregate. record, J. Transp. Res. Board No. 2026 (2007) 3–8.
3) Micro-Deval abrasion test had its irreplaceable value [13] C.P.S. Kandhal, F. Parker Jr, Aggregate tests related to asphalt
in the study of damp rock in terms of the anti- concrete performance in pavements, Final Report Prepared for
abrasion property. Enough attention should be given National Cooperative Highway Research Program (1997).
194 J. Wu et al. / International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11 (2018) 185–194
[14] Y. Hou, L. Wang, D. Wang, P. Liu, M. Guo, J. Yu, Characterization [19] Profession Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Testing
of bitumen micro-mechanical behaviors using AFM, phase dynamics Methods of Aggregate for Highway Engineering (JTJ 058–2000),
theory and MD simulation, Materials 10 (2) (2017) 208. People Traffic Press, Peking, 2000.
[15] Y. Hou, M. Guo, Z. Ge, L. Wang, W. Sun, Mixed-mode I-II cracking [20] B.X. Li, W. Wang, M.Y. Chen, M. Ye, Isometric ratio, roundness
characterization of mortar using phase-field Method, J. Eng. Mech. and sphericity of coarse aggregates and their relationship, J. Build.
143 (7) (2017), 04017033. Mater. 18 (4) (2015) 531–535.
[16] Y. Hou, W. Sun, L. Wang, Y. Huang, M. Guo, A multi-scale [21] Y. Huang, L. Wang, H. Xiong, Evaluation of pavement response and
approach of 348 mode i crack in ettringite, Road Mater. Pavement 360 performance under different scales of APT facilities, Road Mater.
Des. 18 (sup3) (2017) 33–42. Pavement Des. 18 (S3) (2017) 159–169.
[17] M. Guo, A. Bhasin, Y.Q. Tan, Effect of mineral fillers adsorption on [22] Y. Huang, F. Hugo, W. Steyn, H. Xiong, L. Wang, Comparative
rheological 350 and chemical properties of asphalt binder, Constr. Evaluation 363 of Performance of Warm Mix RAP Asphalt Under
Build. Mater. 141 (2017) 152–351. Accelerated Unidirectional Wheelload 364 Trafficking, Accelerated
[18] M. Guo, Y.Q. Tan, J.X. Yu, Y. Hou, L.B. Wang, A direct Pavement Testing International Conference, 2016.
characterization of interfacial 353 interaction between asphalt binder
and mineral fillers by atomic force microscopy, Mater. Struct. 50
(2017) 141, https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1015-9.