Review of Yogi Heroes and Poets PDF
Review of Yogi Heroes and Poets PDF
language, and the non-physical effects of punishment may be studied through the
lens of even ancient Sanskrit intellectual traditions.
Donald R. Davis, Jr
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Downloaded from http://jhs.oxfordjournals.org/ at School of Oriental and African Studies on August 10, 2013
doi:10.1093/jhs/hit020
Yogi Heroes and Poets: Histories and legends of the N@ths. Edited by David N.
Lorenzen and Adrián Muñoz. New York: State University of New York Press,
2011. pp. xviii, 228. $75 (hardcover).
Downloaded from http://jhs.oxfordjournals.org/ at School of Oriental and African Studies on August 10, 2013
their Marathi identity, and, with their Vais.n.ava and S+fa elements, they highlight
the difficulty of generalising about the N@ths.
Two text-based essays attempt broader analyses of N@th doctrine. David Gordon
White draws on the Siddhasiddh@ntapaddhati’s location of the entire cosmos in the
body of the yogin, together with statements in N@th vernacular works, Upanis.ads,
[email protected], the Bhagavadgat@, other parts of the Mah@bh@rata, and tantric texts, to
speculate that the N@ths did not see the body as a microcosm of a macrocosmic
universe, but that through the power of their yoga they literally came to embody
the universe. Adrian Muñoz identifies a ‘threefold N@th canon’ comprising
‘Sanskrit texts on hat.ha-yoga, vernacular N@th poetry, and hagiographic sources’
(p. 110) and sensibly emphasises hagiography’s importance for understanding the
N@th tradition. He then analyses the legend of Goraks.a rescuing Matsyendra from
the land of women that is at the heart of OndraJka’s piece, concurring with pre-
vious commentators that it represents a reformation by Goraks.a of antinomian
Kaula practices. Muñoz’s ambitious attempt at a broad overview of the tradition
is hampered by a superficial acquaintance with some of the texts he uses in his
analysis. Thus the Śivasam.hit@, which is not a N@th work but a product of the
Śravidy@ tantric tradition and has the longest description of vajrolamudr@ in early
hat.hayogic sources (it is the first text to claim – incorrectly – that vajrolamudr@ can
be used to absorb through the penis the mixed products of sexual intercourse),
is said by Muñoz not to mention vajrolamudr@ and to have a ‘rather nontantric
oriented ideology’.
The first two chapters of the book are tours de force by scholars at the height of
their powers. Purushottam Agrawal examines the place of the N@ths in 20th-
century Hindi literary histories and what it tells us about Hindi historiography
and nationalist ideals. David Lorenzen compares the medieval Hindi works of
Gorakh and Kabar, showing that religious identity is better delineated therein
than might be expected and that, in different ways, Kabar and Gorakh both
sought to transcend religious boundaries.
These two essays use the N@ths to shed light on important subjects, but
the reader looking to learn more about the N@ths themselves might find them
somewhat frustrating. More frustrating still would be the remaining essay,
Ishita Banerjee-Dube’s piece on the Mahima Dharma. In seeking to identify N@th
236 Book Reviews
Downloaded from http://jhs.oxfordjournals.org/ at School of Oriental and African Studies on August 10, 2013
To identify such features as originally N@th is to make the mistake that subtly
underpins the volume’s introduction and Muñoz’s essay, namely to posit some
essentialist ‘N@thism’. Such essentialism is rarely made explicit in the text and
at points more realistic appraisals of the N@th tradition are made. Thus, Muñoz
raises the possibility that ‘this tradition is in fact a whole cluster of traditions,
all gathered together under the general label of the Naths’ (p. 124). Yet elsewhere
the spectre of a perennial N@thism does occasionally raise its head. Kiss shows how
in the 13th-century Matsyendrasam.hit@, Goraks.a, later understood to have been
an ascetic who cleansed the N@th tradition of its licentious ways, is depicted as
a Col@ king who learns, among other things, Kaula sexual rituals from his guru
Matsyendra. The introduction says that ‘this argument can be seen as highly
controversial’ (p. xviii). By whom? Scholars will have a hard time picking holes
in Kiss’s thesis, founded as it is in exemplary philological scholarship. Today’s
north Indian N@th ascetics might take offence, but do they really have a better
window onto the south India of 800 years ago?
The volume contains a larger than average number of typographical errors and
inconsistencies, particularly in the use (or not) of diacritics. Some chapters are
worse than others: the volume would have benefited from more thorough copy-
editing. Nevertheless, it includes a wide variety of excellent essays on specific
aspects of N@th tradition. In a short space it covers N@th traditions from the
13th-century to the present day in Bengal, the Hindi belt, Rajasthan, and the
Tamil country. The only significant omissions from current scholarship on aspects
of N@th culture are the ethnographic studies of N@ths in Kerala by Richard
Freeman and in Nepal by Véronique Bouillier, together with the latter’s work
on the north Indian ascetic N@ths who, rightly or wrongly, are usually assumed
to represent the original N@th sam.prad@ya. In spite of this the volume gives a good
introduction to the importance and diversity of the tradition. An omission that
does let it down, however, is that of a reappraisal of the received essentialist
understanding of N@th history in the light of the new data presented.
James Mallinson
Oriental Institute, University of Oxford