Jurnal - Winda
Jurnal - Winda
Winda Nurazizah 1*, Prof. Dr. H. Ilzamudin, M.A2, Dr. Apud, M.pd3
1
Author
2
First Adviser
3
Second Adviser
they can connect their experience with the writer conducted treatment of Inference
story that they are reading. Prompter Chart in teaching reading
comprehension on narrative text and also
METHOD conducted post-test. The lowest score in
The method of this research is post-test is 60 and the highest score in
experimental research. Experimental post-test is 95.
research is a research method that test the
hypothesis which has the form of cause
and effect relations between variables. Post-test of
Experiments are carried out in order to Experimental 2 : 81,6
explore the strength of relationship
Class (X2)
between variables. It means the
experimental research conducted to know
the cause and effect relationship between
independent variable and dependent
variable. Post-test of 2 : 61,6
In this research the researcher Control Class
gives pre-test and post-test experimental. (Y2)
The pre-test is conducted in order to
diagnose students’ current ability in
introducing someone else before the
treatment applied. Meanwhile, post-test is : 4,75
used to measure the effect of study after
applying the treatment. Df : 58
In applying this research, the
researcher teaches about Questioning the The degree of : 2,00
author on students’ reading significant 5%
comprehension on narrative text as
the degree of significant : 2,66
experimental class, and writer do not
teach Questioning the Author toward 1%
students’ reading comprehension on
narrative text as control class. Before deciding the result of
The writer uses two classes. The hypothesis, the researcher proposes
first is as Experimental Class and second interpretation towards with procedure
is as Control Class. The writer chooses as follow:
class IX C which consists of 30 students a. Ha: tobservation>ttable = It means there
as experimental class and class IX B is a significant effectiveness of
which consists of 30 students as control Questioning the Author in
class. teaching reading comprehension
In this research, the researcher on narrative text.
used two kind of instruments in gathering b. Ho: tobservation<ttable = It means there
data. Those are test and observation is no significant effectiveness of
Questioning the Author in
RESULT AND DICUSSION teaching reading comprehension
From the result of pre-test and on narrative text.
post-test in experimental class, the According to the data, the value of
researcher can be concluded that from the tobservation is bigger than ttable.tobservation =
lowest score in pre-test is 35 and the 4.75>ttable = 2.00 (5%) or tobservation = 4.75
highest in pre-test score is 75. After the
>ttable = 2.00 (1%), so Ho is rejected and Ha significant effect. According to the data,
is accepted. the value of to (t observation) is higher
The result of the research shows than tt (t table) 2.00 < 4.75 > 2.66, in
that the experimental class (the students degree of significant 5% and 1%. It means
who are taught using Questioning the that Ha (alternative hypothesis) of
Author) has the mean value (81,6), research is accepted and Ho (null
meanwhile the control class (the students hypothesis) is rejected. Also concluded
who are not taught using Inference there is significant difference of teaching
Prompter Chart) has the mean value reading through Questioning the Author
(71,8). It can be said that the achievement and teaching reading by conventional
score of experimental class is higher than approach.
control class. The following was the table Dealing with the conclusion above,
of pre-test and post-test students’ average the researcher would like to offer some
score. suggestions which may be useful in
improving students’ reading
CONCLUSION comprehension: 1) For the Students: a)
The writer would like to conclude of The students should be motivated to do
the research based on the data obtained reading activity in their daily activity. b)
and the hypothesis submitted at the The students should know that by more
previous chapter as follow: 1) Students’ reading, they will get much knowledge
reading comprehension is less, it can be because it is as the accomplishment to
seen from the mean of pre-test that shows enlarge talent and master English. c) The
many students get worse score. The mean student has to develop their vocabularies
of pre-test is 61,1. The score of their post- because it is a necessary part of
test show increasing, most of them get comprehension instruction which is
better score. The mean of post-test is 81,6. significant influenced their understanding
It means that students can improve their in reading text. 1) For English Teacher
reading comprehension after they got the a) The English teacher should be able to
treatment. 1) The differences between give motivation to the students in
students’ which has given Questioning the interested English language. b) Teachers
Author and other which has not should be very familiar with varieties of
Questioning the Author, because of the teaching technique or method to improve
Questioning the Author, students’ are their students’ reading comprehension.
more familiar with a text given by the c) Teacher should give more attention to
students’. Where with this method, their students’ reading in order to
students’ will predict an event contained comprehend reading text well.
in the text and they also learn how to
make inference of the event, then ACKNOWLEDGMENT
students’ understand a text with carefully. All praises be to Allah SWT, the
It can be seen from the mean of pre-test of almighty God, who has sent Muhammad
the experimental class (61,1) is higher SAW, peace be upon him, to be His
than the mean of pre-test of control class prophet and messenger for people all over
(57,6) and the mean of post-test of the the world. The writer realizes and feels
experimental class (81,6) is bigger than very sure that without His blessing,
the mean of post-test of control class mercy, and guidance, it would be
(71,8) after the treatment. 2) The effect of impossible for her to finish this paper.
teaching reading through Inference In addition, this paper will not
Questioning the Author to increase finish without others’ helps. Therefore, in
students’ reading comprehension is this chance I would like to express my