Complaint With Exhibits
Complaint With Exhibits
Plaintiff
VIOLATIONS OF CLEAN WATER ACT
Vs. NEGLIGENCE; RIPARIAN RIGHTS
Defendant
COMPLAINT
NOW COMES, the Plaintiff, through its undersigned counsel and very respectfully,
Nevarez, a urban development located within the San Juan municipality, where she owns a home
next to the Buena Vista Creek, a tributary of the Rio Piedras/Puerto Nuevo River and also part of the
estuary of the San Juan Bay, a navigable body of water of the United States.
2. The United States District Court has jurisdiction over these actions under the
provisions of Federal Water Pollution Control Act, also known as the Clean Water Act (hereinafter
§1331. The Court’s original jurisdiction is invoked because the claims asserted are founded upon the
existence of federal questions arising under laws of the United States. 28 U.S.C. § 1331.
3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the Court has supplemental jurisdiction over the other
state claims pleaded because they are related to the federal claims and form part of the same case or
controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. Supplemental state law claims for
Case 3:19-cv-01412 Document 1 Filed 04/29/19 Page 2 of 8
2
damages under Commonwealth state law causes of actions, including negligence, nuisance, and
riparian rights.
4. The FPWCA, 33 U.S.C. § 1365, et seq., requires that a citizen give notice of their
claims to any person, including the United States, and or any other governmental entity sixty (60)
days before bringing suit against the alleged violator. See 33 U.S.C. §1365(a)(1), (b)(1)(A).
5. On December 31, 2018, Plaintiff Natalia Cebollero, through her attorney, Edelmiro
Salas González, one of the below undersigned counsels, gave defendant Puerto Rico Aqueduct and
Sewer Authority ("PRASA"), the notice required by the FPWCA (hereinafter “Notice”). See, Ex.
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the Hon. Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney
General, and Peter D. Lopez, Regional Administrator of the EPA for Region 2, among others. See,
7. The Notice included sufficient information to permit the PRWSA to identify the
activity alleged to constitute a violation, as the responsible for the alleged violation, by using specific
Global Positioning Satellite (“GPS”) coordinates of the alleged violation, the date or dates of such
8. Plaintiff’s Notice sent sufficient information to permit the PRASA to identify the
activity alleged to constitute a violation; GPS coordinate of the alleged violation, the date or dates of
such violation, and the full name, address of the persons giving notice. See, Ex. No. 1.
9. More specifically, notice was given to the PRASA that on several dates, the three
sewer manholes located on the GPS coordinates of 18° 23' 56.22" N and 66° 4' 1.81", were
overflowing with sewage, onto the street and into an adjacent rainwater storm drain that collects
the raw sewage and take directly into the Buena Vista Creek, a tributary of the Puerto Nuevo
Case 3:19-cv-01412 Document 1 Filed 04/29/19 Page 3 of 8
3
River. Notice was also given that the storm drain takes the sewage into the Buena Vista Creek at
10. The Notice informed the PRASA that the sewages discharges described in the
immediately preceding paragraph occurred on the following dates: May 27, 2018; September 25,
2018; October 17, 2018; October 23, 2018; November 3, 2018; November 4, 2018; and December
11. The information provided in the NOTICE provided the information necessary to give
a clear indication of the citizens’ intent. The specificity, through GPS coordinates was reasonable
and from should not prevail over the substance of the information.
12. The three sewage manholes located in the vicinity of on the GPS coordinates of 18°
23' 56.22" N and 66° 4' 1.81", are discernible and discrete conveyances, from which pollutants
are being, continuing to be or may be discharged in the immediate future, particularly on events
of rainy weather.
13. The Plaintiff’s Notice also stated that there was an additional storm drainage that
was dumping raw sewage into the Quebrada Buena Vista Creek, during and continuing through
the relevant period, and that from information and belief it was coming from a PRASA sewage
manholes in the nearby Centro Médico area. It was noticed that such sewage discharge occurs
near Ms. Cebollero’s home at the following GPS coordinates: 18° 23' 56.04" N, 66° 4' 3" W. It
was also noticed that these coordinates originated foul smells into her back yard and that these
14. As a result of the sewage discharges described in this complaint and in the Notice,
Plaintiff Natalia Cebollero has had suffered, and continues to suffer, an injury in fact, namely, an
15. The injury to the plaintiff is that whenever heavy rains occurs, raw sewage coming
from the point source herein mentioned, is dumped in the creek that runs through her back yard near
the coordinates quoted in this letter and expose her and her children to diseases, foul odors and other
health threats.
16. Furthermore, Mrs. Cebollero is an arborist and has aesthetic or recreational interest in
walking or using the creek and the Rio Piedras River recreationally is sufficient to confer standing.
Ms. Cebollero has used the affected area, walked in the creek and is a person for whom the aesthetic
and recreational values of the area will be lessened by the challenged activity of dumping raw
17. Plaintiff’s back yard, near 18° 23' 56.04" N, 66° 4' 3" W, is in direct proximity to
the affected area of the Buena Vista Creek. She also lives in Villa Nevarez and would like to use the
18. As a result, Plaintiff future life will be less enjoyable, particularly knowing that she
cannot walk in or near the creek, and not even walk in her neighborhood, feeling that she is walking
on the eggshells of deadly pathogens. It is to be noticed that the quality of the waters of the Buena
Vista Creek should conform to the water quality standards set by the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico’s Environmental Quality Board (EQB) in its Regulation for Water Quality Standards,
Regulation No. 8732 of April 27th, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as “Regulation No. 8732”); before
the discharges herein mentioned began to occur, the waters of the Buena Vista Creek were of
acceptable quality, with no noticeable foul odors and thus, causing no concern to the Plaintiff.
19. Furthermore, Plaintiff really has been, is, and/or will suffer in his or her degree of
degraded with PRASA’s continuous and recurrent spills of raw sewage and. and the conduct herein
complained of.
Case 3:19-cv-01412 Document 1 Filed 04/29/19 Page 5 of 8
5
20. Plaintiff’s injury fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and not the
result of the independent action of some third party not before the Court. Defendants dumping and
spillages of sewage adversely affect Plaintiff by the pollutant and that sewage causes or contributes
21. Defendant’s dumping of sewage into the streets of Villa Nevarez and the Buena Vista
creek are actions causing injuries that will be. redressed by a favorable decision of this Court or
‘fixed’ through a remedy the law provides. Plaintiff’s injuries fall within the “zone of interests” that
the statute was designed to protect. Plaintiff’s interests “share a ‘plausible relationship’ to the
22. Raw Sewage spilling from plaintiff’s in the vicinity of Ms. Cebollero’s home and into
the Buena Vista Cree stemming from PRASA’s sewers are a “Pollutant” as broadly defined in CWA
23. The sewers and sanitary registers are described in this complaint are discernible,
discrete conveyances from which the raw sewage pollutant is discharged into the Buena Vista Creek.
24. The PRASA does not have a permit that allows it to dump non-stormwater discharges
into the storm sewers and dumping the sewage into the creek.
25. The 2015 consent decree between the PRASA and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency, under which PRASA has to monitor the point source discharges and to take steps
to remediate them, (hereinafter “the 2015 consent decree”) does not mention the specific discharge of
sewage mentioned through GPS coordinates in this complaint and in Plaintiff’s 60 day letter. Simply
put, the 2015 decree has not specifically addressed the concerns of this suit.
26. The 2015 consent decree, however, does makes reference to other remedies and
enforcement actions against discharges of pollutants occurring on a street in the Villa Nevárez
neighborhood that is 2,796 feet away from the GPS coordinates provided to the defendant. The 2015
Case 3:19-cv-01412 Document 1 Filed 04/29/19 Page 6 of 8
6
Consent Decree between PRASA and the EPA does not speak of the alleged violations and the
27. Even so, PRASA in a response to the 60 day letter offered no evidence that the EPA
was diligently prosecuting any action addressing the specific violations raised in the 60 day letter and
is therefore not diligently prosecuting any action against PRASA with respect to the specific
28. The violations of sewage discharges are ongoing and several have occurred on
several occasions again after the sixty day letter was sent to the defendant PRASA.
29. Plaintiff reasserts all previously alleged averments of this complaint as part of this
30. Plaintiff’s property is injuriously affected by the PRASA raw sewage spills into the
Buena Vista Creek and into the streets near her home. Plaintiff seeks an abatement of said nuisance
and the damages caused by said nuisance, including her lack of enjoyment of her property.
31. Defendant PRASA has a legal duty to conform to a standard of conduct raised by the
law for the protection of others against unreasonable risks of harm plaintiff’s property and life. The
rights of a property owner such as Plaintiff include the right to use and enjoy her property.
32. The PRASA has breached its duty to the Plaintiff to prevent sewage spills into the
33. The illegal sewage spills, resulting from the PRASA’s breach of its duties, are the
34. Plaintiff reasserts all previously alleged averments of this complaint as part of this
35. Under Puerto Rico Law, Plaintiff has a right to use the Buena Vista Creek to enjoy
nature, including walk within the creek, as well as to enjoy its view, and its ecological value, free
from any nuisance and/or debris and/or discharges that may impede the water flow and/or degrade
the quality of the Buena Vista Creek. Act No. 180 of October 29, 2014 12 L.P.R.A §§421 et seq.;
36. Plaintiff further alleges that the illegal spillage of sewage into the storm sewers
leading into the Quebrada Buena Vista, have turned the storm sewers into rage sewage sewers, which
prevent Plaintiff from exercising her riparian rights by turning the Creek into an illegal cesspool,
impeding her passive enjoyment of the Creek and her welfare and quality of life in her property and
in her home.
37. Plaintiff cannot exercise other riparian rights under the Commonwealth’s Water Laws
as mentioned, and other Commonwealth environmental statutes and regulations because of PRASA’s
sewage discharges.
WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the Honorable Court GRANT the following
relief:
evaluation of the environmental factors involved and the practicalities of the situation, based
on the factual record. Plaintiff demands that defendant be enjoined from continuing any
discharges of pollutant into the creek at the locations specified in her 60 day letter.
unhappiness, and annoyance caused by the Defendant’s actions. Such damages are to be
Case 3:19-cv-01412 Document 1 Filed 04/29/19 Page 8 of 8
8
determined by the enlightened conscience of the jury. Said damages include those that
continue to occur during the pendency of the case and are estimated at $200,000.00
substantially prevailing party, whenever the court determines such award is appropriate. 33
U.S.C. § 1365(d).
E. Punitive damages at an amount no less than $1,000,000.00 given defendant’s willful and
environmental pollution and degradation of the quality of the waters of the United States.
F. Any other and further legal and/or equitable relief to which Plaintiffs and the Classes
might be entitled at law, both State and Federal, or which this Court deems proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiffs, hereby demand a trial by jury on all claims so able to be tried.
)
)
)
Natalia Cebollero-Bertran )
Plaintiff(s) )
) 3:19-cv-1412
v. Civil Action No.
)
)
)
Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority )
)
Defendant(s) )
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it)- or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3)- or 90 days in a Social Security Action- you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached
complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on
the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, whose name and address are:
1072 Calle 17, Urb. Villa Nevarez San Juan, Puerto Rico 00927 T:(787) 376-4659 [email protected]
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
Date:
------------------
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Case 3:19-cv-01412 Document 1-3 Filed 04/29/19 Page 2 of 2
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (I))
D Other (specify):
My fees are$ for travel and $ for services, for a total of$
Date:
Server's signature
Server's address
(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff San Juan County of Residence of First Listed Defendant San Juan
(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES) (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF
THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED.
(c) Attorneys (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number) Attorneys (If Known)
Edelmiro Salas-González, 1072 Calle 17, Urb. Villa Nevarez, San Juan
PR 00927. (787) 376-4659
II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an “X” in One Box Only) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff
(For Diversity Cases Only) and One Box for Defendant)
’ 1 U.S. Government ’ 3 Federal Question PTF DEF PTF DEF
Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party) Citizen of This State ’ 1 ’ 1 Incorporated or Principal Place ’ 4 ’ 4
of Business In This State
’ 2 U.S. Government ’ 4 Diversity Citizen of Another State ’ 2 ’ 2 Incorporated and Principal Place ’ 5 ’ 5
Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III) of Business In Another State
The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filings and service of pleading or other papers as
required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is
required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. Consequently, a civil cover sheet is submitted to the Clerk of
Court for each civil complaint filed. The attorney filing a case should complete the form as follows:
I.(a) Plaintiffs-Defendants. Enter names (last, first, middle initial) of plaintiff and defendant. If the plaintiff or defendant is a government agency, use
only the full name or standard abbreviations. If the plaintiff or defendant is an official within a government agency, identify first the agency and
then the official, giving both name and title.
(b) County of Residence. For each civil case filed, except U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county where the first listed plaintiff resides at the
time of filing. In U.S. plaintiff cases, enter the name of the county in which the first listed defendant resides at the time of filing. (NOTE: In land
condemnation cases, the county of residence of the "defendant" is the location of the tract of land involved.)
(c) Attorneys. Enter the firm name, address, telephone number, and attorney of record. If there are several attorneys, list them on an attachment, noting
in this section "(see attachment)".
II. Jurisdiction. The basis of jurisdiction is set forth under Rule 8(a), F.R.Cv.P., which requires that jurisdictions be shown in pleadings. Place an "X"
in one of the boxes. If there is more than one basis of jurisdiction, precedence is given in the order shown below.
United States plaintiff. (1) Jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1348. Suits by agencies and officers of the United States are included here.
United States defendant. (2) When the plaintiff is suing the United States, its officers or agencies, place an "X" in this box.
Federal question. (3) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1331, where jurisdiction arises under the Constitution of the United States, an amendment
to the Constitution, an act of Congress or a treaty of the United States. In cases where the U.S. is a party, the U.S. plaintiff or defendant code takes
precedence, and box 1 or 2 should be marked.
Diversity of citizenship. (4) This refers to suits under 28 U.S.C. 1332, where parties are citizens of different states. When Box 4 is checked, the
citizenship of the different parties must be checked. (See Section III below; NOTE: federal question actions take precedence over diversity
cases.)
III. Residence (citizenship) of Principal Parties. This section of the JS 44 is to be completed if diversity of citizenship was indicated above. Mark this
section for each principal party.
IV. Nature of Suit. Place an "X" in the appropriate box. If there are multiple nature of suit codes associated with the case, pick the nature of suit code
that is most applicable. Click here for: Nature of Suit Code Descriptions.
VI. Cause of Action. Report the civil statute directly related to the cause of action and give a brief description of the cause. Do not cite jurisdictional
statutes unless diversity. Example: U.S. Civil Statute: 47 USC 553 Brief Description: Unauthorized reception of cable service
VII. Requested in Complaint. Class Action. Place an "X" in this box if you are filing a class action under Rule 23, F.R.Cv.P.
Demand. In this space enter the actual dollar amount being demanded or indicate other demand, such as a preliminary injunction.
Jury Demand. Check the appropriate box to indicate whether or not a jury is being demanded.
VIII. Related Cases. This section of the JS 44 is used to reference related pending cases, if any. If there are related pending cases, insert the docket
numbers and the corresponding judge names for such cases.
Date and Attorney Signature. Date and sign the civil cover sheet.
Case 3:19-cv-01412 Document 1-5 Filed 04/29/19 Page 1 of 1
CATEGORY SHEET
You must accompany. your complaint with this Category Sheet, and the Civil Cover Sheet (JS-44).
Email Address:
1. Title (caption) of the Case (provide only the names of the first party on each side):
4. Has a prior action between the same parties and based on the same claim ever been filed before this Court?
I Yes
(X No
5. Is this case required to be heard and determined by a district court of three judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284?
I Yes
IX No
6. Does this case question the constitutionality of a state statute? (See, Fed.R.Civ. P. 24)
J Yes
15< No