Ricarze vs. Court of Appeals
Ricarze vs. Court of Appeals
for as long as the criminal act charged in the complaint or information can be 3 Id., at p. 222.
Under Section 5, Rule 11020 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure, 2004, 446 SCRA 166, 185.
all criminal actions covered by a complaint or information shall be prosecuted 22 Id.
under the direct supervision and control of the public prosecutor. Thus, even if 315
the felonies or delictual acts of the accused result in damage or injury to VOL. 515, FEBRUARY 9, 2007 315
another, the civil action for the recovery of civil liability based Ricarze vs. Court of Appeals
_______________ 1. 2.Reparation of the damage caused;
19 Id., at pp. 29-30.
2. 3.Indemnification for consequential damages.
20 See SECTION 1. Institution of criminal and civil actions.—(a) When a
On the other hand, Section 14, Rule 110 of the Revised Rules of Criminal
criminal action is instituted, the civil action for the recovery of civil liability Procedure states:
arising from the offense charged shall be deemed instituted with the criminal
Page 5 of 8
“Section 14. Amendment or substitution.—A complaint or information may be or cause surprise or deprive the accused of an opportunity to meet the new
amended, in form or in substance, without leave of court, at any time before averment had each been held to be one of form and not of substance. 26
the accused enters his plea. After the plea and during the trial, a formal In the case at bar, the substitution of Caltex by PCIB as private complaint
amendment may only be made with leave of court and when it can be done is not a substantial amendment. The substitution did not alter the basis of the
without causing prejudice to the rights of the accused. charge in both Informations, nor did it result in any prejudice to petitioner. The
However, any amendment before plea, which downgrades the nature of documentary evidence in the form of the forged checks remained the same,
the offense charged in or excludes any accused from the complaint or and all such evidence was available to petitioner well before the trial. Thus, he
information, can be made only upon motion by the prosecutor, with notice to cannot claim any surprise by virtue of the substitution.
the offended party and with leave of court. The court shall state its reasons in Petitioner next argues that in no way was PCIB subrogated to the rights of
resolving the motion and copies of its order shall be furnished all parties, Caltex, considering that he has no knowledge of the subrogation much less
especially the offended party.” gave his consent to it. Alternatively, he posits that if subrogation was proper,
Thus, before the accused enters his plea, a formal or substantial amendment then the
of the complaint or information may be made without leave of court. After the _______________
entry of a plea, only a formal amendment may be made but with leave of court 25 Id.
and if it does not prejudice the rights of the accused. After arraignment, a 26 Id., at pp. 747-748.
he must be described under a fictitious name (Rule 110, Section 11, Revised entry of appearance in behalf of PCIBank on October 5,
Rules of Court; now Rule 110, Section 12 of the 1985 Rules on Criminal 322
Procedure.] In case of offenses against property, the designation of the name 322 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED
of the offended party is not absolutely indispensable for as long as the criminal Ricarze vs. Court of Appeals
act charged in the complaint or information can be properly identified. Thus, Court agrees with the observation of the CA that contrary to his claim,
Rule 110, Section 11 of the Rules of Court provides that: petitioner did not question the said entry of appearance even as the RTC
Section 11. Name of the offended party.— acknowledged the same on October 8, 1999.35 Thus, petitioner cannot feign
... ignorance or surprise of the incident, which are “all water under the bridge for
_______________ [his] failure to make a timely objection thereto.”36
33 Supra note 11.
WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The assailed decision and
321 resolution of the Court of Appeals are AFFIRMED. This case is REMANDED
VOL. 515, FEBRUARY 9, 2007 321 to the Regional Trial Court of Makati City, Branch 63, for further proceedings.
Ricarze vs. Court of Appeals SO ORDERED.
1. (a)In cases of offenses against property, if the name of the offended Ynares-Santiago (Chairp erson), Austria-Martinezand Chico-
party is unknown, the property, subject matter of the offense, must Nazario, JJ., concur.
be described with such particularity as to properly identify the Petition denied, assailed decision and resolution affirmed.
particular offense charged. Note.—An amendment to an information which does not change the nature
2. (b)If in the course of the trial, the true name of the person against of the crime alleged therein does not affect the essence of the offense or cause
whom or against whose property the offense was committed is surprise or deprive the accused of an opportunity to meet the new averment
disclosed or ascertained, the court must cause the true name to be had each been held to be one of form and not of substance. (Matalam vs.
inserted in the complaint or information or record. Sandiganbayan, Second Division, 455 SCRA 736 [2005])
... ——o0o——
In U.S. v. Kepner [1 Phil. 519 (1902)], this Court laid down the rule that _______________
when an offense shall have been described in the complaint with sufficient 1999, and the trial court duly noted such appearance in its Order dated
certainty as to Identify the act, an erroneous allegation as to the person injured October 8, 1999. (see Rollo, pp. 406 and 408).
shall be deemed immaterial as the same is a mere formal defect which did not 35 Rollo, p. 66.
tend to prejudice any substantial right of the defendant. Accordingly, in the 36 Id., at p. 67.
aforementioned case, which had a factual backdrop similar to the instant case, 323
where the defendant was charged with estafa for the misappropriation of the © Copyright 2019 Central Book Supply, Inc. All rights reserved.
proceeds of a warrant which he had cashed without authority, the erroneous
allegation in the complaint to the effect that the unlawful act was to the
prejudice of the owner of the cheque, when in reality the bank which cashed it
was the one which suffered a loss, was held to be immaterial on the ground
that the subject matter of the estafa, the warrant, was described in the
complaint with such particularity as to properly Identify the particular offense
charged. In the instant suit for estafa which is a crime against property under
the Revised Penal Code, since the check, which was the subject-matter of the
offense, was described with such particularity as to properly identify the
offense charged, it becomes immaterial, for purposes of convicting the
accused, that it was established during the trial that the offended party was
Page 8 of 8