Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Response To Themes of W.H. Auden's 'The Unknown Citizen'
Response To Themes of W.H. Auden's 'The Unknown Citizen'
Julie Moore, does have some point in her explanation of the poem but isn’t entirely
accurate. She mentioned three separate themes in discussing her analysis of the poem:
anonymity, conformity, and governmental control. The anonymous man in the poem,
although severely criticized by Moore, is definitely not the only one in the setting of
the poem. In my opinion, the possible purpose behind The Unknown Citizen is to
mock the government instead of to “warn us about the dangers of modern society.”
When the author first discusses “anonymity”, she brings up how the man was
merely defined by his perfect statistics and was not judged by his own character. This
point is further supported by the fact that he was referred to by numbers instead of
being addressed by a proper name. However, the author did not consider the possible
setting of the poem. If the background society of The Unknown Citizen was similar to
that of a socialist government, how could the anonymous man even have the chance
of being recognized fully when the government doesn’t even bother to know its
people and only demands control over its population? Sure, Auden did address
anonymity here, but I believe he is also insinuating that a society under socialist rule
Secondly, the author brings up “conformity”, saying that it has created “apathetic
and obedient citizens” since they are all conforming to the rules set by the government.
IEP 26 Brian
However, I don’t entirely agree on this. Although it is true that the people are
following the “rules”, the author did not consider whether they are even aware that
those are rules. In many socialist or specifically totalitarian societies, the masses are
often brainwashed to an extent that they don’t even think they’re abiding by the rules.
If the man was like a Prole living under the regime of the Party in 1984, he wouldn’t
even realize he was following the rules and his living conditions are bad. If we put
these all together, it can once again be seen that Auden is possibly mocking socialism,
Finally, the author mentions “governmental control”. This is the part I actually
agree with the most, since Moore writes how the poem was written form the
government’s perspective and that the government “does not truly care about” the
man, as evidenced by the last two lines of the poem. It also implies that even if the
man does have any negative thoughts or opinions, he wouldn’t be able to express it.
The tone here gives me the feeling that the man is in a similar situation as Winston in
1984, where opinions aren’t allowed. Again, drawing from this point, it is likely that
The life of the anonymous man in the poem is similar to that of the people under
the Party’s rule in 1984 in many ways. First of all, both the man and the Proles are
basically anonymous and all of “their kind” is unanimous under the government’s eye.
IEP 26 Brian
Also, the governments of The Unknown Citizen and the Party in 1984 don’t care about
their people as long as they don’t break the “rules” and interfere with anything. Last
but not the least, it seems that both works are satires mocking socialism, as they both
demonstrate the deprival of the rights which we normally consider “basic”, such as
freedom; and shows how small and unimportant the citizens are in the view of a
socialist government.
In conclusion, although the author did correctly analyze parts of the poem, she
seems to have missed some points and possible alternative explanations. Throughout
the essay, she was continuously mocking the unknown person for being an apathetic
nobody without considering the possible background fully enough. Her analysis does
not look into the deeper aspects of the poem and simply judges it from its surface;