Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GHKNBC
GHKNBC
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/ICEHM.ED0214022 37
International Conference on Business, Management & Corporate Social Responsibility (ICBMCSR'14) Feb. 14-15, 2014 Batam (Indonesia)
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/ICEHM.ED0214022 38
International Conference on Business, Management & Corporate Social Responsibility (ICBMCSR'14) Feb. 14-15, 2014 Batam (Indonesia)
The researcher administered the modified English Language there is no significant difference in their pretest – posttest
Proficiency Test (ELPT) focused on reading comprehension to performance profile, it is revealed that their comprehension
the respondents to assess their level of proficiency and reading level in terms of literal, interpretive and evaluative levels had a
comprehension level of literal, interpretive, and evaluative. A high significant difference. This is a clear proof of the help of
self-made questionnaire adapted from Balut and Araya was Mnemonic Instruction in enhancing their reading
utilized to determine the demographic profile of the comprehension skills. With regards to their proficiency level,
respondents in terms of age, gender and parents’ educational it discloses that it is not significant.
attainment. 8. By matching the over-all comprehension level
The statistical analyses were performed on the data obtained performance profile of the Control Group and the
from the demographic profile and the ELPT test given to the Experimental Group before the treatment, it has been found
respondents of the study. The descriptive statistics such as out that the two group’s literal level has a significant
frequency, percentage and mean were used to identify the difference. It shows that the Experimental Group performed
respondent’s demographic profile, comprehension and better than the Control Group. In terms of their interpretive
proficiency level. The p-value was used for the hypothesis and evaluative level, both groups show that their performances
testing to determine their pretest-posttest comprehension and have no significant difference. This only means that their
proficiency levels of significant difference and so with the comprehension level is very close. As to their proficiency
Control Group and Experimental Group’s overall performance level, it reveals that there is a highly significant difference.
before and after the treatment. Results have shown that Control Group is a better
comprehender than the Experimental Group and this is proven
VII. FINDINGS according to their class sectioning as the Control Group
Based on the statistical analysis applied on the data, the belongs to the 5th section while the Experimental Group
study yielded the following findings: belongs to the 6th section among the seven sections of the first
1. The students belonged to the 12-13 age bracket. Aged 13 year high school.
and above is considered to be “over-age” based on the 9. Finally, the epitome of this study which is to determine
DepEd’s school age requirement. Female students the significant difference of the overall performance profile of
outnumbered the male students. Majority of the respondents’ the Control Group and the Experimental Group after the
fathers had finished only elementary level while the treatment. Regarding their comprehension levels, the three
respondents’ mothers had finished high school. comprehension levels of the Control Group and the
2. Comparing the pretest – posttest performance profile of Experimental Group coupled with their proficiency level are
the Control Group using the Traditional Learning Strategies, it all highly significant. These only indicate that Experimental
is revealed that their comprehension level in terms of literal Group surpasses the performance level of the Control Group.
level had a great increase from poor to fair and few elevate to The striking performance of the Experimental Group over
the level of good and very good; In terms of interpretive level, Control Group can be justifiably attributed to the treatment -
it had declined; and in terms of evaluative level, it had a little Mnemonic Instruction initiated in the Experimental Group’s
increase. class. There are some detected variations in the scores on the
3. Comparing the pretest – posttest performance profile of test but these are negligible or insignificant.
the Experimental Group using the Mnemonic Instruction, it is
revealed that their comprehension level in terms of literal level VIII. CONCLUSION
had a great increase from poor to fair and few elevate to the Generally, this study shows that Mnemonic Instruction is
level of good and very good; In terms of interpretive level, it more effective in enhancing the learner’s comprehension as
had improved significantly; and in terms of evaluative level, it compared to the Traditional Learning Strategies. It boosts their
had increased also. memory power in storing and retrieving information by finding
4. With regards to the proficiency level of the Control a way to relate new information to information learners already
Group, it has revealed that respondents’ score has increased. have locked in long-term memory. Mnemonics bridges the gap
5. With regards to the proficiency level of the Experimental and provides meaningful connections between the known to
Group, it has revealed that respondents’ score has a slight the unknown that are difficult to remember. It builds the
increase. learners self-confidence in coping with their language learning
6. By analyzing the p-value of the comprehension levels of tasks and even other field of disciplines that require memory
the Control Group using the Traditional Learning Strategies if retrieval. It also develops their psychomotor, cognitive and
there is no significant difference in their pretest – posttest metacognitive skills as they create their own mnemonics and
performance profile; it is revealed that their comprehension apply it to their present learning situation. Thus, it can be
level in terms of literal and interpretive levels has no concluded that students engaged in the use of mnemonic
significant difference while their evaluative level proves to be devices find their learning of English more meaningful and
highly significant. With regards to their proficiency level, it enjoyable.
exposes that it is highly significant. Their proficiency level
elevated from high beginner to low intermediate.
7. By analyzing the p-value of the comprehension levels of
the Experimental Group using the Mnemonic Instruction if
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/ICEHM.ED0214022 39
International Conference on Business, Management & Corporate Social Responsibility (ICBMCSR'14) Feb. 14-15, 2014 Batam (Indonesia)
http://dx.doi.org/10.15242/ICEHM.ED0214022 40