Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corroboration of Prosecution Evidence
Corroboration of Prosecution Evidence
IN
A.F.R.
Reserved on 11.05.2016
Delivered on 26.05.2016
along with
And
I.P.C.
Mr. Umesh Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State, Mr. I.B.
on his body:-
11 Lal Mani.
the evidence of DW-1 and DW-2 was that one TATA 407
this the driver replied that he shall pay the tax after his
Pratap Singh asked him to take back the bus to the taxi
is as under:-
offence.
cross case.
mentioned earlier.
proceedings.
the deceased.
referred to Lucknow.
PW-2 and PW-3 wholly reliable and has also found the
Case Crime No. 114-A of 2001 and said site plan has
side. The reason for such incident was that Sunil Kumar
under:-
under:-
from his house was 40 km. Next day in the morning i.e.
case and has also not disclosed the name of jeep driver
Singh has stated that it was Ram Naresh who told him
come in evidence that his right leg was fractured. All the
been concealed.
witness to be unreliable.
that Yash Pal Singh, the then DGP was in close contact
jeep and asked the key of the jeep from his driver and
could not work out the name of the driver and owner of
started saying before the Court during trial for the first
PW-11 Lal Mani has stated that PW-2 Ram Naresh Singh
1971 (3) SCC 436 wherein Hon'ble the Apex Court has
eftLVsªsV] iqfyl v/kh{kd] ,l0 vks0 ,l0 vkbZ0 vkfn us esjs iq= dk
c;ku vafdr ugha fd;k vkSj tuin xksaMk ds Fkkuk uokcxat dh iqfyl
Paper book number of the said case diary was 5262 and
started from page no. 48. Page no. 47 of the case diary
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
was not the part of the case diary of Case Crime No.
114-A of 2001.
this case was lodged after two days and at that time,
and its head lights and front glass were also broken.
was parked on the road and with the aid of the same,
the site plan has not been challenged so TATA 407 was
was fractured.
as under:-
WWW.LIVELAW.IN
deserves to be dismissed.
discharged.
Order Date :-26.5.2016 (Anil Kumar Srivastava-II, J.) (S.V.S. Rathore, J.)
Virendra