Young Einstein
Young Einstein
John Lekner
School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington
In 1905 Einstein wrote five history-making papers (on the particle Albert’s younger sister Maja (Maria) has written a charming
nature of light, Brownian motion, special relativity, energy and and perceptive biographical sketch of Albert’s early years [1].
inertia, and on molecular dimensions). He was 26, married to As a child he was quiet and would play by himself for hours.
Mileva Mari, with one-year-old child Hans Albert, and employed
He had ‘such difficulty with language that those around him
as Technical Expert (third class) by the Bern Patent Office. His
relativity theory captured the public imagination, but his quantum feared he would never learn to speak’. At 2½ he was told of the
ideas were even more revolutionary. His light quantum (now arrival of a little sister, with whom he could play. He must have
the ‘photon’) was rejected by Planck, who is often thought of imagined a kind of toy, because at the sight of the baby he asked,
as the originator of the concept, and by Millikan, whose 1916 with disappointment, ‘Yes, but where are its wheels?’
photoelectric data agreed beautifully with Einstein’s predictions
(‘a bold, not to say reckless, hypothesis of an electromagnetic As a child of four or five his father brought him a magnetic
light corpuscle … which flies in the face of thoroughly established compass (he was ill in bed). In his autobiography Einstein re-
facts of interference’). Compton’s 1923 paper on the scattering of called the sense of wonder at how the enclosed and apparently
X-rays and gamma rays uses the light quantum idea, but makes
isolated needle responded to an invisible magnetic field.
no mention of Einstein. There followed more than 20 papers on
various aspects of quantum theory, substantial enough to make Though quiet, young Albert had a temper. A lady violin
Einstein one of the founders of quantum mechanics, possibly the teacher was attacked with a chair, never to reappear. Maja herself
founder. This paper traces the beginnings of quantum mechan-
was subject to his violent tantrums, once having a large bowling
ics, giving an outline of Einstein’s contributions. It begins with a
sketch of his early life. ball thrown at her; another time she was hit in the head with a
child’s hoe. She remarks ruefully ‘... a sound skull is needed
to be the sister of a thinker’. The temper tantrums disappeared
during his early school years (he entered school at 7).
Young Einstein (1879 to 1904)
Albert Einstein was born in Ulm, Bavaria, on 14 March 1879. Persistence and tenacity were already part of his character
His parents were Hermann and Pauline (nee Koch), ‘of Israelite at this age. He would work on puzzles, erect complicated struc-
religion’ as stated on Albert’s birth certificate, actually non- tures with his building block set, and build houses of cards up
practising Jews. Hermann was a partner in his cousin’s mercan- to 14 stories high.
tile business in Ulm. Hermann’s younger brother Jakob was an On entering public school, religious instruction was ob-
engineer, and persuaded Hermann to join him in a plumbing ligatory. (He and Maja went to a nearby Catholic elementary
and electrical venture in Munich, when Albert was two. Jakob school.) He was taught at home by a distant relative, and ‘caught
had designed a dynamo, which he wanted to manufacture. The religion’. He ate no pork for years, and took it amiss that his
venture failed in Germany, but showed promise in Italy. The parents were lax in their Jewish observances.
plant was accordingly transferred to Pavia, the family moving to
Milan in 1894, later to Pavia, and then back to Milan. Eventually Young Albert was not happy at secondary school, the Luit-
this failed, and the family had little left. Most of the (initially pold Gymnasium (like a grammar school, where pupils receive
large) Koch family assets had been used up, but against Albert’s a classical education). He later wrote ‘As a pupil I was neither
wise advice (he was then 17), Hermann started up a third electri- particularly good nor bad. My principal weakness was a poor
cal factory, in Milan. This failed also. Hermann died of a heart memory ... especially for words and texts’. His teacher of Greek
condition in 1902, when Albert was 23. By then the family had told him ‘You will never amount to anything’. However, he was
experienced much mobility, and a sharp decline in wealth. captivated by mathematics: earlier, his uncle Jakob (the engi-
John Lekner was educated at Auckland Grammar, University of Auckland, and University of
Chicago. He has taught at Cambridge and at Victoria University of Wellington. He has written
one book, ‘Theory of reflection of electromagnetic and particle waves’ (1987), and more than 100
papers, mainly in the fields of quantum mechanics, statistical physics, and electromagnetism.
John may be contacted at [email protected]
neer) told him of the Pythagorean theorem; after considerable view concerning the production and transformation of light’ [4],
effort Albert found a proof. He later worked through a book on was submitted in March 1905. This, and related papers, will be
Euclidean geometry, the theorems in which had a ‘lucidity and discussed in Section 3.
certainty (that) made an indescribable impression on me’. The
exposure to mathematics and science now made the impres- First clues
sionable Einstein antireligious. The certainty of belief was to Spectral lines
be replaced by a profound suspicion of any authority. This must We live in a quantum universe, but its quantum nature is not
have been apparent in class: his teacher of Greek asked him to easily apparent. This section traces the first clues; all three
leave the school: ‘Your mere presence spoils the respect of the originated in nineteenth century observations and experiments,
class for me’. At this time his parents had moved to Italy, Albert and two were associated with light.
staying behind in Munich to finish his secondary education. He
William Hyde Wollaston (1766–1828) noticed dark lines in
obtained a doctor’s certificate to enable him to leave the Luitpold
the solar spectrum in 1802; he interpreted these as gaps sepa-
Gymnasium (at 15), and rejoined his family in Milan. One of the
rating the colours of the Sun. Joseph Fraunhofer (1787–1826)
most joyous periods in his life followed, as he studied only the
rediscovered these lines (now known to be absorption lines) in
subjects he liked. ‘Museums, art treasures, churches, concerts,
the course of precision measurements of the refractive index
books and more books, family, friends, the warm Italian sun, the
free, warmhearted people – all merged into a heady adventure
of escape and wonderful self-discovery’ [3].
Albert resolved to change his citizenship: ‘The over-
emphasized military mentality in the German State was alien to
me even as a boy’. He applied for Swiss citizenship when he was
of age to do so (in October 1899); this was granted in February
1901. He completed his secondary schooling in Switzerland,
and was admitted to the Zurich Polytechnic (ETH) in October
1896. (There he met fellow physics student Mileva Marić, from
Serbia, whom he was later to marry. A daughter, called ‘Lieserl’
in their letters, was born out of wedlock early in 1902. It seems
she was adopted; nothing further is known.) He graduated with a
Diplom in July 1900, but was unable to obtain any work except
tutoring and substitute teaching jobs for two years. Finally he
secured a position as Technical Expert (third class) at the Swiss
Patent Office in Bern in June 1902. His father died in October
of that year, and he married Mileva in January 1903. Their son
Hans Albert was born in May 1904.
Einstein’s early publications (1901–1904) were on thermo-
dynamics. The first quantum paper, ‘On a heuristic point of Albert Einstein at Bern Patent Office.
kT >> hf, and the Wien (1893) law in the opposite limit. It leads
easily to the Stefan-Boltzmann law that the total radiation en-
times around the interior, with vanishing probability of being ergy is proportional to T 4. Further, the fit to the data also gave
reflected straight out. In such a cavity the radiation is in thermal Boltzmann’s constant k, and thus Avogadro’s number. More
equilibrium with the walls; each is at temperature T. information followed: the charge on the electron, for example,
from Avogadro’s number and electrochemical experiments. A
Classical (i.e. non-quantum) statistical mechanics shows that
triumph, but deeply unsettling. As Einstein was later to write
in thermal equilibrium each ‘degree of freedom’, such as motion
‘All attempts to adapt the theoretical foundations of physics to
in a given direction, or rotation about a given axis, has associ-
these new notions failed completely. It was as if the ground had
ated with it an average energy ½kT, where k is Boltzmann’s
been pulled out from under one with no firm foundation to be
constant, and T is the absolute temperature. For example, an
seen anywhere, upon which one could have built’.
atom in three dimensions would have average energy 3/2kT.
Rayleigh (1842–1919) applied this result, called ‘equipartition’, Heat capacities
to thermal radiation in 1900. It gives the energy density In a monatomic gas the average kinetic energy is 3/2 kT by the
equipartition law. The total energy for N atoms is E = 3/2 NkT.
8Sf 2 The heat capacity is defined as the rate of change of energy with
u( f , T ) kT
c3 (4) temperature, CV = (∂E / ∂T )V (it matters whether the change is at
This cannot be true for all frequencies: the energy per unit constant volume or constant pressure, hence the subscript V).
volume in the frequency range df is udf, and the total energy Thus for a monatomic gas Cv = 3/2 Nk. This was found to be in
∞
∫ 0
udf would be infinite. However, the Rayleigh-Jeans law,
as it is known (Jeans corrected the numerical multiplier in (4)),
agreement with experiment. But equipartition failed for molecu-
lar gases: a molecule has rotational and vibrational degrees of
agreed with experiment at low frequencies. freedom, as well as translational ones, and some of these were
apparently not excited. There was also a problem with solids:
Max Planck found, in October 1900, an ingenious inter-
each atom can vibrate about its equilibrium position, so it has
polation between (4) and a high-frequency form due to Wil-
six degrees of freedom associated with its kinetic and potential
helm Wien. Planck’s formula for the energy density of thermal
energies. A heat capacity of 3Nk is expected, and indeed found,
radiation is
at room temperatures for most solids, but not for some (such as
diamond), and not at low temperatures, where all heat capaci-
8Sh f3
u( f , T ) ties approach zero.
c 3 e hf / kT 1 (5)
Again a fundamental mystery, to be resolved later by quan-
The new constant h (now ‘Planck’s constant’) could be
tum mechanics. The explanation, first formulated by Einstein
found by fitting (5) to the latest experimental data. The fit was
as we shall see, lies in the discrete nature of the energy levels
within experimental error. By December 1900, ‘after some
of a quantum system. Some of the degrees of freedom are
of the most intense work in my life’, Planck had a theoretical
‘frozen’ because there is not enough thermal energy to excite
justification for his formula. In what he later described as ‘an
the system from its lowest energy level (the ‘ground state’) to
act of desperation’, he assumed that the oscillators forming
higher energy levels.
the walls of his idealised enclosure could only have energies
which were integral multiples of hf, where f was the frequency The light quantum
of the oscillator.
We now come to Einstein’s first quantum paper [4], written in
Planck’s formula gives the Rayleigh-Jeans law when March 1905. He begins: ‘A profound formal distinction exists
between the theoretical concepts which physicists have formed
H (1954) and lasers (1961) came much later. (The term LASER
H n 1
f H / kT comes from Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of
e 1
¦ e nH / kT
n 0 (8) Radiation.)
For N atoms vibrating in 3 directions the average energy is In the same 1917 paper, Einstein considers the momentum
–
3Ne , and the heat capacity is interchange between the gas and the radiation field. He shows
2
that light quanta of energy e have to carry momentum e /c for
wH § H · e H / kT the velocity distribution in the gas to be Maxwellian. He writes
C 3N 3 Nk ¨ ¸ H / kT
wT © kT ¹ (e 1) 2 (9) ‘... we arrive at a consistent theory only if each elementary proc-
ess is completely directional’, meaning that the photons do not
(If there are many vibration frequencies, one sums over terms
radiate as spherical waves from each molecule, as was thought
like (9).) Einstein notes that C goes to zero for kT << e, and to
to be the case. (Such spherical waves have zero net momentum.)
the high-temperature value 3Nk in the opposite limit. Not only
Further, ‘If a ray of light causes a molecule hit by it to absorb
these limits, but also the qualitative behaviour, are in agreement
or emit ... an amount of energy hf in the form of radiation ...
with experiment, as Einstein shows by comparing theory with
the momentum is always transferred to the molecule’. This is
the data for diamond. Einstein’s note about sums over many
exactly the modern photon view of emission and absorption.
frequencies was prescient: in fact one needs to consider the
And Einstein was pleased with the work: in a letter to his friend
collective vibrations (now called phonons), as was done by
Michele Besso in September 1916 he writes ‘With this, the
Born and Karman and by Debye, in 1912.
existence of light quanta is practically assured’.
The next two quantum papers of Einstein are reviews of the
Let us summarise Einstein’s achievements in quantum
structure of radiation [13, 14]. In [13] he evaluates the energy
physics up to this point: (i) the light quantum, a kind of fusion
fluctuations in thermal light, and finds the sum of two terms, one
of the wave and particle concepts, and its application to the
following from the corpuscular, the other from the wave nature
photoelectric effect and other phenomena; (ii) the first quantum
of light. One can interpret the first as arising from the localised
theory of specific heat; (iii) the fundamentals of the thermal
nature of the light quanta, the other from their interference as
equilibrium between matter and radiation, with the new concept
waves. Einstein also remarks (in [13]) on the fact that h and
of stimulated emission. Any one of these was substantial enough
e2 /c have the same dimension, and thus their ratio may possibly
to warrant a Nobel Prize, and the first one did. (The special
be explained on the basis of pure numbers. We wish! The ratio
theory of relativity, and the explanation of Brownian motion,
e
2
/ c ≈ 1 / 137.036 , now known as the fine structure constant,
are also of Nobel standard!)
and experimentally determined to parts per billion (namely
0.00729735253, with an uncertainty of ±2 in the last place) is But Einstein had another mission: from 1911 he worked to
still eluding theoretical evaluation nearly a hundred years on. generalise his relativity theory to include accelerated frames
We have already mentioned Einstein’s 1917 paper ‘On and gravitation. The General Theory was probably his greatest
the quantum theory of radiation’ [9], in relation to the photon achievement, and its success in the prediction of the advance of
Epilogue
example, the ‘EPR paradox’, designed to show that the quan-
Albert and Mileva Marić parted in 1914, Mileva returning to tum position is absurd. The decay of a neutral pi meson into
Zurich with Hans Albert and Eduard. Einstein continued to an electron and a positron, p0 6 e– + e+, illustrates the point. In
support her and the boys during the war and after. They were the rest frame of the pion, the electron and positron fly off in
divorced in February 1919, and he married his widowed cousin opposite directions. The pion has zero spin, so the conservation
Elsa Löwenthal (née Einstein) in June of that year. Part of the of angular momentum requires zero spin for the electron-posi-
divorce settlement was the assignment the money from a fu- tron pair. If the electron has spin up, the positron must have
ture Nobel Prize to Mileva! (The Nobel was finally awarded to spin down, and vice versa. This is not a problem for the realist
Einstein in 1921.) stance: the electron had spin up, we just did not know it (i.e. y
During and after the war Einstein made clear his pacifist does not contain the complete information, the EPR assertion).
views, and this, together with his Jewish background, and high The orthodox position leads to a situation which is weird, but
visibility following the 1919 confirmation of his prediction entirely confirmed by modern experiments: measurement of
of the bending of light, made him a target, well before Hitler the electron spin instantaneously fixes the positron spin, no
took control of Germany. As Emilio Segrè (Nobel Prize 1959) matter how large the distance between the particle-antiparticle
writes in the second volume of his excellent history of physics pair! The measurements are perfectly correlated, by means of
[17] ‘There was even an anti-Einstein scientific society where some ‘spooky action-at-a-distance’ (Einstein’s words), called
once respected and respectable names became mixed with ‘entanglement of the wavefunction’ in modern quantum me-
demagogues, madmen, and future Nazi recruits ... The situa- chanics. The experiments verify perfect up/down correlation,
tion took an ugly turn, especially since the extremists would at all distances. For Einstein, this meant propagation of some
not hesitate to assassinate their enemies. The murder of W. influence at infinite speed, contrary to relativity theory. But
Rathenau, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Weimar Republic, perfect correlation does not imply that information is being
was a warning of what could happen’. (Rathenau was a personal transmitted faster than light: the measurer of the electron spin
friend of Einstein.) With the arrival of Nazism, Einstein finally has no influence on which result is obtained, and so cannot send
left Germany in December 1932, never to return. a binary signal with elements ‘up’ and ‘down’.
He settled in Princeton, where he worked on the unification The EPR view led to the ‘hidden variable’ idea: if y gives
of electromagnetism and gravitation. Einstein maintained an in- an incomplete description of reality, there must be another
terest in quantum mechanics, but believed it to be an incomplete variable, which, if we could calculate it, would give a complete
description of reality. In his final quantum paper, with Podolsky description. Einstein died in 1955, at the age of 76. It was not
and Rosen [18], the foundations of quantum mechanics are till 1964 that J.S. Bell proved that any local hidden variable
questioned. The authors assert that ‘A sufficient condition for theory is incompatible with quantum mechanics. Thus non-
the reality of a physical quantity is the possibility of predict- locality (spooky action-at-a-distance, or entanglement) seems
ing it with certainty, without disturbing the system’. This is to be with us, like it or not: experiment is king in science,
the so-called realist viewpoint, that a quantum state actually and experiment has completely verified the orthodox view of
has a certain property (spin along a certain axis, for example) quantum mechanics. Einstein is turning in his grave, or perhaps
prior to measurement. The orthodox quantum position is that his soul is protesting strongly to the Maker of the Universe.
the wavefunction y does not uniquely determine the outcome No-one claims to understand quantum physics; we just know
of a measurement: it provides (through | y | 2) only the statisti- how to use it to calculate physical properties of radiation and
cal distribution of the possible results. The paper provides an matter. It works.