Susi Vs Razon

Arugay, Marie Joy A.
Land Titles and Deeds

2017-0070 Atty. Francis Doble
Valentin Susi vs. Angela Razon and Director of Lands

G.R. No. L-24066 (December 9, 1925)
BRIEF SUMMARY: The case originated from the piece of land made into a fish pond of Nemesio
Pinlac sold to Apolonio Garcia and Basilio Mendoza then later they sold it to Valentin Susi, the
latter reserving the right to repurchase it. Before the execution of the deed of sale, Valentin Susi
had already paid its price and sown "bacawan" on said land, with the proceeds of the sale of which
he had paid the price of the property. The possession and occupation of the land in question, has
been open, continuous, adverse and public, without any interruption, except during the revolution,
or disturbance. Until Angela Razon commenced an action to recover the possession of said land.
The trial court rendered judgment in favor of Valentin Susi. After failing to have favorable decision
from the court, Angela Razon applied to the Director of Lands for the purchase of the land. Having
learned of said application, Valentin Susi, asserting his possession of the land for twenty-five (25)
years, it can hardly be estimated when he began to possess and occupy it, the period of time being
so long that it is beyond the reach of memory. The Director of Lands overruled the decision in
favor of Valentin Susi then sold the land to Angela Razon. By virtue of said grant the register of
deeds of Pampanga in 1921, issued the proper certificate of title to Angela Razon and by the power
of the title to the land she required Valentin Susi to vacate thereto but the latter refused to do so,
she brought an action for forcible entry and detainer in the justice of the peace court of Guagua,
Pampanga, which was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, the case being one of title to real property.
Hence, this case.
RULE OF LAW: If the land, the possession of which is in dispute, had already become, by
operation of law, private property of the plaintiff, there lacking only the judicial sanction of his
title, petitioner has the right to bring an action to recover possession thereof and hold it.
FACTS: An action commenced in the Court of First Instance (CFI) of Pampanga by a complaint
filed by Valentin Susi against Angela Razon and the Director of Lands, praying for judgment: (a)
Declaring plaintiff the sole and absolute owner of the parcel of land (b) annulling the sale made
by the Director of Lands in favor of Angela Razon, on the ground that the land is a private property;
(c) ordering the cancellation of the certificate of title issued to said Angela Razon; and (d)
sentencing the latter to pay plaintiff the sum of P500 as damages, with the costs. The Director of
Lands denied each and every allegation and said that the land in question was a property of the
Government of the United States under the administration and control of the Philippine Islands
before its sale to Angela Razon, which was made in accordance with law. After the trial, CFI of
Pampanga rendered judgment declaring the petitioner, Valentin Susi, entitled to the possession of
the land, annulling the sale made by the Director of Lands in favor of respondent, Angela Razon,
and ordering the cancellation of the certificate of title issued to her, with the costs against Angela
Razon. Director of Lands took this appeal on the decision of CFI Pampanga evidencing the
background of the land in question in this case that in 1880, Nemesio Pinlac sold the land in
question, then a fish pond, to Apolonio Garcia and Basilio Mendoza for the sum of P12, reserving
the right to repurchase the same. After having been in possession thereof for about 8 years
Apolonio Garcia and Basilio Mendoza in 1899, sold it to Valentin Susi for the sum of P12,
reserving the right to repurchase it. Before the execution of the deed of sale, Valentin Susi had
already paid its price and sown "bacawan" on said land, availing himself of the firewood gathered
thereon, with the proceeds of the sale of which he had paid the price of the property. The possession
and occupation of the land was first by Apolonio Garcia and Basilio Mendoza and then by Valentin
Susi has been open, continuous, adverse and public, without any interruption, except during the
revolution, or disturbance until when Angela Razon in 1913, commenced an action in the CFI of
Pampanga to recover the possession of said land wherein the court rendered judgment in favor of
Valentin Susi and against Angela Razon, dismissing the complaint. Having failed in her attempt
to obtain possession of the land in question through the court, Angela Razon applied to the Director
of Lands for the purchase in 1914. Having learned of said application, Valentin Susi filed an
opposition asserting his possession of the land for 25 years but the Director of Lands overruled the
opposition of Valentin Susi and sold the land to Angela Razon and by virtue of certificate of title
to Angela Razon required Valentin Susi to vacate the land but he refused to do so, she brought an
action for forcible entry and detainer in the justice of the peace court of Guagua, Pampanga, which
was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, the case being one of title to real property. Valentin Susi
then brought this action.
ISSUE: Whether or not there is an error in the judgment of CFI of Pampanga that an open,
continuous, adverse possession of land of public domain from time immemorial confers an
effective title on the said possessor.
HELD: NO. For the foregoing, and no error having been found in the judgment appealed from,
the same is hereby affirmed in all its parts, without special pronouncement as to costs. So ordered.
The court ruled in favor of Valentin Susi, there is, moreover, the presumption juris et de
jure established in paragraph (b) of section 45 of Act No. 2874, amending Act No. 926, that all the
necessary requirements for a grant by the Government were complied with, for he has been in
actual and physical possession, personally and through his predecessors, of an agricultural land of
the public domain openly, continuously, exclusively and publicly since July 26, 1894, with a right
to a certificate of title to said land under the provisions of Chapter VIII of said Act.
When Angela Razon applied for the grant in her favor, Valentin Susi had already acquired, by
operation of law, not only a right to a grant, but a grant of the Government, for it is not necessary
that certificate of title should be issued in order that said grant may be sanctioned by the courts, an
application therefore is sufficient, under the provisions of section 47 of Act No. 2874. If by a legal
fiction, Valentin Susi had acquired the land in question by a grant of the State, it had already ceased
to be the public domain and had become private property, at least by presumption, of Valentin
Susi, beyond the control of the Director of Lands.
Consequently, in selling the land in question to Angela Razon, the Director of Lands
disposed of a land over which he had no longer any title or control, and the sale thus made was
void and of no effect, and Angela Razon did not thereby acquire any righto the land.

Susi Vs Razon

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

Susi Vs Razon

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Susi Vs Razon

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Arugay, Marie Joy A.

Land Titles and Deeds

Valentin Susi vs. Angela Razon and Director of Lands

You might also like