Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 Office of The Ombudsman vs. Enoc PDF
5 Office of The Ombudsman vs. Enoc PDF
*
G.R. Nos. 145957-68. January 25, 2002.
MENDOZA, J.:
1
This is a petition for review on certiorari of the order, dated 3
October 7, 2000, of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 19 of Digos,
_______________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cb2b91eb4bb5205c6003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/6
8/21/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 374
* SECOND DIVISION.
1 Per Judge Hilario I. Mapayo. Petition, Annex “A”; Rollo, pp. 36-37.
692
_______________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cb2b91eb4bb5205c6003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/6
8/21/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 374
2 Rollo, p. 38.
3 “An Act Further Defining the Jurisdiction of the Sandiganbayan, Amending for
the Purpose Presidential Decree No. 1606, as amended, Providing Funds Therefor,
and for Other Purposes.”
4 312 SCRA 77 (1999).
693
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cb2b91eb4bb5205c6003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/6
8/21/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 374
_______________
694
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cb2b91eb4bb5205c6003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 4/6
8/21/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 374
695
——o0o——
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cb2b91eb4bb5205c6003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/6
8/21/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 374
696
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016cb2b91eb4bb5205c6003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/6