Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Timor Leste
Timor Leste
May 2018
Contents
Acknowledgements � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 5
Acronyms and Abbreviations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 6
Executive summary � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 8
Summary of recommendations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 11
1. Introduction � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 13
1.1 Background � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 13
1.2 Purpose � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 13
1.3 Scope � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14
1.4 Key review questions � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 14
2. Methodology � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16
2.1 Methods � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 16
2.2 Limitations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17
2.3 Report structure � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 17
3. Timor-Leste’s workforce development environment � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18
3.1 The importance of workforce development � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 18
3.2 Factors affecting supply and demand for workforce development � � � � � � � � � � � � 18
3.3 Lessons from other donors in Timor-Leste � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 20
3.4 Lessons from other countries � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 21
3.5 The higher education and TVET sector � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 23
3.6 Workforce skills and priority sectors for economic development � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 26
3.7 Current and future workforce demands for Timor-Leste � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 30
4. DFAT’s current investments in workforce development in TL � � � � � 33
4.1 Overview of current investments � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 33
4.2 Contribution to workforce readiness � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 35
4.3 Contribution to enhancing capacity of GoTL � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 39
4.4 Approaches and partners � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 41
4.5 Key lessons from the current WDPTL � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 44
5. Bringing it all together � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 45
6. Recommendations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 48
7. Annexes � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50
Annex A: References � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 50
Annex B: List of consultations � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � 52
3
4
Acknowledgements
This review was commissioned by the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign
Affairs and Trade (DFAT) in Timor-Leste.
M&E House (Buka Hatene) in Timor-Leste developed and managed the review, and
provided quality assurance reviews for this report. M&E House is funded by DFAT in
Timor‑Leste and implemented by GHD Pty Ltd in association with Clear Horizon Pty Ltd.
The team was comprised of Dr Richard Curtain as Team Leader / Technical Specialist;
Dr Bu Wilson as Evaluation Specialist/Team Leader; Ms Christine Bouchard as DFAT
Representative; and Mr Cosme da Costa Araújo as National Consultant. The authors of the
first draft of the report were Dr Richard Curtain and Dr Bu Wilson. Subsequent versions of
the report were authored by Dr Bu Wilson.
The review was overseen by a steering committee consisting of Dan Woods, Diana
Nelson, Regan Field, Manuel Barreiros Guimarães, Sue Smith and Dr Louise Maher.
The Workforce Development Strategic Review Team would like to thank the many people
who gave generously of their time and insights during the course of this review.
This included staff of DFAT in Timor-Leste and Australia, many institutions of the
Government of Timor-Leste, the Workforce Development Program Timor-Leste (WDPTL),
M&E House, other Government of Australia programs in Timor-Leste, other bilateral
and multilateral agencies in Timor-Leste, businesses, non-government organisations,
educational institutions in Timor-Leste and Australia, training centres, returned Australia
Awards alumni and seasonal workers, and other beneficiaries of WDPTL-supported
courses, as well as members of the Scholarship Management Group and the Australia
Awards Alumni Association.
5
Acronyms and Abbreviations
AAS Australia Awards Scholarship
ADB Asian Development Bank
APTC Australia-Pacific Technical College
APTC3 Australia-Pacific Training Coalition (APTC Stage 3)
AQF Australian Qualifications Framework
ATELP Australia Timor-Leste English Language Program
CNEFP Centro Nacional de Emprego e Formação Profissional, Tibar
(National Centre of Employment and Professional Training)
CNFP SENAI Centro Nacional de Formaçao Profissional – Becora
CSC Civil Service Commission
CTID Centro Treino Integral e Desenvolvimento, Baucau
DFAT Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
DNIMT National Directorate of Labour Market Information
EDTL Electricidade de Timor-Leste (East Timor Electricity)
ELC English Language Centre
ELT English language training
EOPO End-of-program outcomes
ESS Enterprise and Skills Survey
FGD Focus group discussion
GESI Gender and social inclusion
GfD Governance for Development
GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (German
Development Agency)
GoA Government of Australia
GoTL Government of Timor-Leste
HCDF Human Capital Development Fund
IADE Instituto de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Empresarial (Institute for Support
of Business Development)
ICFP Instituto Católico para Formação de Professores (Catholic Teachers’
Training College)
ILO International Labour Organization
INDMO National Institute for Labour Force Development
INFORDEPE Instituto de Formação de Docentes e Profissionais da Educação
KRQ Key review question
6
LMAP Labour Mobility Assistance Program
LSU Labour Sending Unit
LTA Long-term adviser
M&E Monitoring and evaluation
MDF Market Development Facility
MELF Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning Framework)
MLSTP Mid-Level Skills Training Program (ADB)
MoE Ministry of Education
NGO Non-government organisation
NQF National Qualification Framework
NT Northern Territory
NT DAMA Northern Territory Designated Area Migration Agreement
PLS Pacific Labour Scheme
PWD People with Disabilities
SABER Systems Approach for Better Education Results (World Bank)
SDRA Sentru Dezenvolvimentu Rekursu Aprendizajen (Learning Resources
Development Centre)
SEJT Secretariat of State for Youth and Labour
Senai NT Senai NT English Language Centre, Becora
SEPFOPE Secretariat of State for Vocational Training and Employment Policy
SMG Scholarship Management Group
STA Short-term adviser
STVJ Sentru Treinamentu Vokasional Juventude (Youth Vocational
Training Centre)
SWP Seasonal Worker Program
TLNQF Timor-Leste National Qualifications Framework
TOMAK To’os Ba Moris Diak (Farming for Prosperity)
TVET Technical and vocational education and training
USAID United States Agency for International Development
UNTL National University of Timor-Leste
VSP Vanuatu Skills Partnership
VTSSP Vanuatu Technical and Vocational Education and Training Sector
Strengthening Program
WDP Workforce Development Program (refers to any future program)
WDPTL Workforce Development Program Timor-Leste
WDSR Workforce Development Strategic Review
7
Executive summary
Background
Workforce development is central to Timor-Leste – not only to the growth of its economy,
but to developing a diversified non-oil economy that is not overwhelmingly dependent on
the public sector. Each year over 30,000 Timorese reach working age (GoTL, 2015a).
With a labour force participation rate of about 30% (ILO, 2016), this means 9,000 new
entrants to the labour market every year. Currently only about 4,000 new jobs are being
created per year (SEJT, 2018a). Finding employment for these young people is key to
maintaining national stability. Insufficient post-secondary education opportunities and a
small formal labour market mean that the majority of the population is engaged in making
a living through subsistence agriculture, micro-businesses and unskilled labouring.
Significant skill gaps mean that the economy is currently dependent on foreign workers
in key occupations. Meanwhile, many Timorese leave the country to seek employment
overseas in the UK, Korea or Australia. In 2016, Australia responded to these challenges
by amalgamating three previously separate programs to form the Workforce Development
Program Timor-Leste (WDPTL), with the overall goal of creating a skilled workforce for
a prosperous Timor-Leste. This is to be achieved through three intended end-of-program
outcomes of improved policy and systems for workforce development, more
people are workforce ready and program beneficiaries utilise their skills,
experience or income. Investment in the program is $A12.7m for the period 2014–18.
It has three components: Australia Awards scholarships and alumni support, skills
development and employment, and English language training (ELT). The program provides
support to a variety of Government of Timor-Leste (GoTL) agencies, GoTL and private training
centres, and the English Language Centre (ELC) of Timor-Leste’s National University (UNTL).
Purpose
This Workforce Development Strategic Review was commissioned by the Department
of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) in Timor-Leste. The Review team evaluated the
WDPTL and recommended strategic investment approaches and priorities that will inform
design of the future workforce development program (WDP) scheduled to commence in
2019. The review focused on answering seven key review questions about relevance,
appropriateness, effectiveness and learning (see Table 1).
Methodology
The strategic review used a mixed-methods approach and multiple data sources in order
to provide more valid and reliable findings. Methods included an initial document review,
followed by a 19-day in-country visit over January–February 2018. During this time
the team conducted over 100 interviews with key stakeholders and three focus group
discussions with a) technical and vocational education and training (TVET) trainers, b)
Australia Awards alumni and c) people with disabilities (PWD) who had undertaken the
WDPTL English for Employability course. The review team conducted preliminary data
analysis while in country, principally through three workshops in which key findings were
compared against review questions. Preliminary findings and recommendations were
presented, discussed and validated at a workshop with the steering committee on 15
February 2018. The authors of the report made final evaluative judgements.
8
Main findings
Relevance: The workforce development environment in Timor-Leste is challenging.
Workforce development initiatives in countries with a comparable context show that there
are clear benefits to taking the long view on workforce development and engaging in
considered adaptation in response to changing circumstances and new understandings.
Other key lessons include the need for high-quality TVET training that responds to the
needs of employers and is based on careful analysis of domestic and international labour
market requirements. Over the longer term, and as relationships mature, the demonstrated
value of high-quality, responsive TVET training can be used to build coalitions for change
of the broader TVET system. Creative approaches are needed to reform the TVET to
create a more responsive and relevant system. Based on experience in similar countries
in the Asia–Pacific region, and Australia’s links to labour mobility programs, the Australian
development program would have a comparative advantage focusing on the TVET sector
in country, while continuing to support the expansion of scholarships for targeted tertiary
study in Australia. In the current development context, the most relevant sectors for
contributing to economic development are agriculture (to enable import substitution) and
export industries such as coffee, tourism and hospitality, and labour services. Timor-Leste
has significant skill shortages and gaps. In the private sector these are often filled by foreign
workers, in particular in areas such as management, higher-level administration, accounting
and book-keeping, and technical and trade skills. Despite an identified need for public
sector development of skills in leadership and management to improve service delivery,
including for workforce development, this is currently beyond the scope of a WDP and
may be better resourced in collaboration with the Governance for Development program.
There are few opportunities in Timor-Leste to diversify the currently oil-based economy.
However, improved labour mobility with attendant improved incomes and skill development
is currently occurring through expansion of the Seasonal Worker Program (SWP). This
has the potential, with the right preparation, to expand in the near future through the
Pacific Labour Scheme (PLS). Experience gained through these opportunities could also
contribute to meeting domestic tourism, hospitality and commercial agriculture needs in a
cyclical and mutually reinforcing way.
Effectiveness: DFAT’s support for SWP is making an increasingly important contribution
to work readiness through a rapidly expanding program. There are opportunities to better
support reintegration of SWP to find pathways to employment, establish businesses,
access further training or take advantage of new labour mobility. DFAT’s support for
scholarships and alumni make a small but important contribution, in a crowded scholarship
landscape, to more Timorese being work-ready. The number of Australia Awards
scholarships (AAS) could be increased by exploring a range of co-funding, sponsorship
and partnership arrangements. There is widespread support for AAS supporting a more
balanced mix of undergraduate and postgraduate study and short courses.
Currently the WDPTL is unable to meet the high demand for ELT. Although the ELT
component of the program has been of short duration, there have been several positive
outcomes, but the program’s approach to ELT needs consolidation and integration. It is
difficult to demonstrate the contribution of the ELC or ELT for secondary school teachers to
work readiness. ELT should be prioritised for workforce development investments such as
labour mobility, TVET training, scholarships and social inclusion activities. Although current
levels of ELT improve the work readiness of both SWP candidates and TVET trainers,
it is unlikely to be sufficient to enable them to be competitive against foreign workers in
Timor‑Leste, or with citizens of Pacific Island countries with English levels suitable for the PLS.
9
The WDPTL program has made good progress in enhancing the capacity of National
Directorate of Labour Market Information staff to collect, analyse and disseminate labour
market information; increased the capacity of the Labour Sending Unit to administer the
SWP in a responsive manner; and increased the ability of the National Institute for Labour
Force Development to engage with stakeholders and administer the quality assurance
system. However, some agencies’ capacity development is not commensurate with the
resources provided by development partners over a long period of time. Progress has
been limited by an overall low level of capacity across GoTL agencies. A focus on GoTL
capacity to analyse and disseminate labour market information remains important, as does
the ability to manage labour mobility programs.
Appropriateness: Work with the GoTL has had positive outcomes and exposed
problems, revealing ways to broaden the range of partners and approaches to respond to
changing circumstances and emerging opportunities. Currently there is some interaction
between DFAT’s various investments for workforce development, but impact could be
maximised by extending this collaboration through closer working relationships in the
future. The program’s work to include women and marginalised people has been strong
but could be further integrated into all aspects of a new WDP. Challenges for PWD include
low school completion, which prevents them from accessing post-secondary education,
and discriminatory work practices that make it harder to find employment. WDPTL has
ensured greater access for women and marginalised people, and has provided a beneficial
“stepping stone” approach in recognition of PWDs’ barriers to access to other employment
and training opportunities.
Learning: A future WDP will need a longer timeframe, of at least five years, with an
option to renew to be effective. It will also require a common understanding of program
design and outcomes by the program and implementing partners, realistic outputs and
timeframes, revised governance arrangements, careful consideration of the balance of
long-term advisers and short-term advisers, and a Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning
Framework suited to collecting evidence about outcomes.
10
Summary of recommendations
In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should:
Recommendation 1: include an emphasis on quality TVET training in country that can
close existing labour skill gaps currently filled by foreign workers and meet the needs of
prospective domestic and international employers.
Recommendation 2: focus on supporting the acquisition of skills that can contribute to
the development of identified export industries such as coffee, tourism and labour services
and the development of commercial agriculture to enable import substitution. Over the
longer term it will be important to take a broad and responsive view of the technical and
business skills required to support diversified value chains in these areas.
Recommendation 3: support initiatives that will position Timor-Leste for improved labour
mobility opportunities. These should include continuing support for the development
of GoTL capacity to manage expanded involvement in the SWP, as well as for the
development of relevant Australian-level qualifications in Timor-Leste suitable for
participation in the PLS. Ideally these skills, or components of them, will also be relevant for
the domestic tourist and commercial agriculture market.
Recommendation 4: deepen the current benefits of the SWP by providing additional
reintegration support to returning seasonal workers to find pathways to employment,
establish businesses, access further training or take advantage of new labour mobility
opportunities.
Recommendation 5: continue to support Australia Awards scholarships and alumni,
explore opportunities for co-funding to increase the availability of scholarships, and
ensure the relevance of qualifications pursued, and consider restoring the emphasis on
undergraduate training.
Recommendation 6: continue to support ELT as a priority and undertake targeted and
independent assessments to strengthen its delivery. These assessments should include
ELT learning outcomes to date, and whether the current standard of English is adequate
for labour mobility, domestic tourism and hospitality purposes. ELT for SWP, AAS, PWD
and TVET trainers should continue, but ELT for secondary school teachers and support
for the UNTL ELC should not. ELT should be integrated into all other program activities as
appropriate and be delivered through existing training institutions, which could be
co-funded by the Government of Australia (GoA), and strengthened through partnerships
with institutions in Australia or Timor-Leste (where those institutions deliver to the Australian
standard).
Recommendation 7: continue to support GoTL capacity to analyse and disseminate
labour market information and manage labour mobility programs.
Recommendation 8: demonstrate the value of establishing high-quality Australian-standard
TVET qualifications that respond to international and domestic demand to drive domestic
TVET reform.
Recommendation 9: continue to work with GoTL but put greater emphasis on partnering
with industry, employers and Australian institutions in all areas.
11
Recommendation 10: greatly increase support for future labour mobility opportunities in
and establish linkages with the commercial agriculture, domestic tourism and hospitality
sectors, and target the technical and business skills required to support diversified value
chains in these areas.
Recommendation 11: ensure other GoA investments are further leveraged for maximum
workforce development, in particular the forthcoming PLS, as well as To’os Ba Moris
Diak (TOMAK – Farming for Prosperity) and the Market Development Facility, to maximise
linkages between labour mobility and development of commercial agriculture and domestic
tourism opportunities.
Recommendation 12: plan for a longer-term and more flexible program that is able to
respond to emergent opportunities – of at least five years, with an option to renew.
Recommendation 13: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should utilise a “coalitions
for change” approach to address complex workforce development issues.
12
1. Introduction
1.1 Background
The Government of Australia (GoA) provides on-going support to the Government of
Timor-Leste (GoTL) to achieve its development goals and national development outcomes.
Australia’s aid program in Timor-Leste currently has three strategic objectives: improving
livelihoods, enhancing human development and strengthening governance and institutions.
A performance assessment framework for the Australian development program in
Timor‑Leste is currently being developed, and will include three strategic themes: economy,
people and society. Under the strategic theme of economy, the aid program has three key
outcomes: more people are workforce ready, more jobs and a stronger private sector, and
improved rural incomes.
The main Australian development program investment in the workforce development
sector, the Workforce Development Program Timor-Leste (WDPTL), aims to contribute
towards these three economy theme outcomes. The end-of-program outcomes (EOPOs)
for WDPTL are:
improved policy and systems for workforce development;
people are workforce ready; and
program beneficiaries utilise their skills, experience or income.
The program in its current form commenced in 2016 and will conclude in December
2018, and is implemented by Palladium. A subsequent program addressing workforce
development in Timor-Leste is planned for commencement in 2019.
The GoA in Timor-Leste commissioned a Workforce Development Strategic Review
(WDSR) to provide recommendations to inform the design of the next phase of
programming.
1.2 Purpose
The review team was charged with evaluating the current WDPTL and recommending
strategic investment approaches and priorities to inform a future workforce development
program (WDP).
The review had three components:
Prove (20%): to assess the effectiveness of the GoA’s current approach to workforce
development programming in Timor-Leste;
Knowledge (40%): to identify the strengths, challenges, opportunities and demand-side
factors in the workforce development sector in Timor-Leste that determine its ability to
contribute effectively to a more prosperous Timor-Leste; and
Improve (40%): to recommend future strategic investment approaches and priorities
in workforce development in Timor-Leste to maximise impact and contribution to
prosperity.
13
1.3 Scope
The review covered the WDPTL between its commencement in 2016 and early 2018, with
some reference to earlier components included in this program. It focused on answering
seven key review questions (KRQs), based on evaluation criteria of effectiveness, learning,
appropriateness and relevance. The evaluation questions relating to effectiveness and
appropriateness focus on the WDPTL (KRQs 4–6); the questions relating to learning and
relevance are about the broader workforce development sector (KRQs 1–3 and 7).
The review considered approaches designed to achieve the Australian development
program’s outcomes of “more people are workforce ready” and “more jobs and a strong
private sector” to identify recommendations for future investments. The team examined
the supply side and the demand side and the links between them. The supply side
involves increasing the number of people who are work-ready in sectors that contribute
to economic growth. The demand side involves developing a workforce which meets the
current and future needs of the private and public sectors in Timor-Leste and regionally.
14
KRQ 4 - Appropriateness 4.1 What are the strengths, gaps and opportunities with
To what extent do DFAT investments promote respect to maximising workforce development within
the right mix of approaches and partners DFAT’s current approaches and partners?
to maximise workforce development in 4.2 What is the best mix of partners and approaches?
Timor‑Leste? 4.3 How is WDPTL ensuring women and marginalised
people have better access to the benefits and services
of the program? What challenges and opportunities
are there?
KRQ 5 - Effectiveness 5.1 To what extent has WDPTL support for the Seasonal
To what extent have DFAT investments led to Worker Program (SWP), including from the Secretariat
more Timorese people being workforce ready? of State for Youth and Labour, contributed to more
people being workforce ready? What are the challenges
and opportunities?
5.2 To what extent have Australian Award scholarships and
alumni support contributed to more Timorese being work
ready? What are the challenges and opportunities?
5.3 Given that English language has been identified more
broadly as a priority to make more Timorese work ready,
is the current focus of the Australia Timor-Leste English
Language Program most effective?
What are the challenges and opportunities?
KRQ 6 - Effectiveness 6.1 How and to what extent has the support provided
To what extent have DFAT investments by WDPTL to collect and utilise labour market data
enhanced the capacity of the Timorese produced results which have informed GoTL decision
government to develop a stronger workforce in making? What are the opportunities and challenges?
Timor-Leste? 6.2 How and to what extent has GoTL leveraged the skills
and experience of SWP returnees and DFAT alumni to
ensure they are able to make a contribution to a stronger
workforce in Timor-Leste?
6.3 In what ways have DFAT investments contributed to
government counterparts demonstrating improved
technical or management capacity?
6.4 To what extent are relevant stakeholders (public and
private) effectively implementing workforce development
policy and system initiatives? What are the challenges
and opportunities?
KRQ 7 - Learning 7.1 What are the key lessons from a review of WDPTL?
Given DFAT’s objectives in the sector, what has 7.2 What are the key lessons from workforce development
been learned that could improve existing or investments in countries with a comparable context?
new investments in workforce development? 7.3 How can DFAT’s other investments in Timor-Leste
be maximally leveraged to contribute to workforce
development?
7.4 What key lessons can be learned from other bilateral
and multilateral donors contributing to workforce
development in Timor-Leste?
15
2. Methodology
2.1 Methods
The strategic review used a mixed-method approach and multiple data sources in order
to provide more valid and reliable findings. The methodology consisted of the following
components.
A document review and synthesis were conducted in order to scope existing knowledge
against the KRQs; identify gaps; begin to triangulate existing data; identify further
documents, individuals and informants for the review; and generate sub-questions – refer
Annex A. The review covered documents from Timor-Leste including GoTL strategic plans,
national survey results, and reports; documents regarding the Australian development
program and its investments in Timor-Leste; reports from other bilateral and multilateral
organisations in Timor-Leste; and WDPTL program plans and reports. The review also
drew on research on comparable workforce development programs in other countries to
describe opportunities, experiences, similar approaches, issues, responses and lessons
learned.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted over January and February 2018 with over
100 stakeholders relevant to workforce development. Annex B contains a list of these
consultations. Interviews allow respondents to express their views in their own terms
while providing reliable, comparable qualitative data. An interview guide was developed,
comprising an introduction to the purpose of the review and a list of questions and topics
to be covered during the conversation, ideally in a particular order. Although a Likert scale
was initially used to measure attitudes of employers and training providers to various
aspects of workforce development in Timor-Leste, it became apparent that responses
were inconsistent with responses in interviews, and the scale was not used in final
analysis.
Three separate focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in February 2018
with TVET trainers, Australia Awards alumni and people with disabilities (PWD) who had
undertaken the WDPTL English for Employability course. FGDs are recognised as being
particularly effective for needs assessments and project evaluation purposes.
They are an efficient way of eliciting candid responses, and through facilitated discussion,
enable participants to build on each other’s ideas through “piggybacking”. FGDs also
provide access to a greater number of individuals in a short period of time than individual
interviews. While FGDs do not provide as much detail as an interview, they allow deeper
exploration of issues than a questionnaire (Leung & Savithri, 2009). FGD participants are
also listed at Annex B.
Dr Curtain and Mr Araujo attended the National Directorate of Labour Market Information
(DNIMT) Labour Market Information Conference on 8 February, 2018. This provided access
to new information and a greater range of stakeholders.
The review team conducted preliminary data analysis while still in country, principally
through three workshops designed to analyse findings against review questions.
Preliminary findings and recommendations were presented, discussed and validated at a
workshop with the Steering Committee on 15 February 2018. The authors of this report
made final evaluative judgements.
16
2.2 Limitations
As with any study of this nature there were several limitations. These included:
a period of political uncertainty, in which Parliament was dissolved in January 2018,
and elections called for May 2018.
possible selection bias due to a purposive sampling process;
possible response biases (inherent in all self-reporting methods including interviews,
FGDs and surveys); and
possible measurement error due to respondents not understanding what was being
asked, failing to remember relevant information or not giving an accurate response.
17
3. Timor-Leste’s workforce
development environment
3.1 The importance of workforce development
Each year over 30,000 Timorese reach working age (GoTL, 2015a). With a labour force
participation rate of about 30% (ILO, 2016), this means 9,000 new entrants to the labour
market every year. Currently only about 4,000 new jobs are being created per year
(SEJT, 2018a). Poor education outcomes mean that there are few people with the skills
to take advantage of the jobs that are available. In a country where 41.8% of people live
below the national poverty line (GoTL, 2014), finding employment for these young people
is key to maintaining national stability. Timor-Leste’s future depends on not only growing
its economy but more importantly on developing a diversified non-oil economy that is not
overwhelmingly dependent on the public sector (ADB, 2015).
The private sector is crucial to the development of a greater range of economic activities
that will generate jobs and income for an increasing number of young Timorese.
This will also require an increasing number of people who can respond to incentives to
take risks, innovate and solve problems. Their chances of success are increased if they
are supported by an enabling workforce development framework, with key components
such as a national strategy and governance of that strategy, the introduction of a national
qualifications framework, competency-based training, and accountability for results.
Of the many things that can improve productivity in the private sector, it has been argued
that human capacity is the number one priority. This requires education and skills training
and attendant high-quality enterprise supervision, management and leadership (Inder &
Cornwell, 2016).
1 Youth bulges are defined as a large 15–24 age cohort relative to the adult population.
2 Urdal’s cross-national time-series study of all countries for the 1950–2000 period found that the presence of youth
bulges increases the risk of conflict outbreak significantly.
18
In addition, access to education has increased, with more young people in each five-year
age cohort continuing onto and completing senior secondary school and undertaking
post-secondary qualifications and tertiary education (GoTL, 2015a). These better-qualified
young people are also leaving the education system in increasing numbers and hoping to
find a reliable means of earning a living.
Domestic private sector employment growth has been slow, and in recent times has
contracted, with the 2016 Business Activity Survey showing a 5.1% decrease in private
sector employment since 2015 (GoTL, 2016). The 2017 Enterprise and Skills Survey
found that employment in Dili decreased by 9.4%, or 5,190 jobs, between January 2016
and October 2017 (SEJT, 2018a). Previously Timor-Leste created many jobs through
utilising oil revenues to develop the public service and finance expenditure on infrastructure
to create jobs in the formal economy (Freedman, 2015). However, the IMF has forecast
that oil’s contribution to Timor-Leste’s GDP will drop to zero by 2022 (IMF, 2017). Most new
employment over the last five years has been in the construction, retail and wholesale
service sectors. The construction industry in 2016 accounted for 51% of all profit
generated, the highest proportion of all industries (GoTL, 2016). However, these jobs are
temporary because they are reliant on project funding. The need to cap public service
expansion coupled with diminishing oil revenues means that in the future much more
emphasis will need to be placed on private sector development that is not dependent on
government expenditure.
Timor-Leste continues to rely on approximately 7,000 foreign workers to provide skills
(SEJT, 2018a). The number of foreign workers is estimated to be nine per cent of all
employees, however the share of foreign workers in each broad occupation group varies
greatly. The Enterprise and Skills Survey 2017 estimated that foreign workers account
for one in three craft and related trades workers, one in four managers, one in five
professionals and one in six technicians and associate professionals (SEJT, 2018a).
Work permit data on occupations for mid-level skills shows the potential for import
substitution, if there was a mechanism encouraging employers of foreign workers to
transfer their skills to Timorese workers who already have appropriate training.
At the same time, many Timorese are living overseas for the purposes of employment.
The 2015 census counted 8,782 people in this category, although the true number is
thought to be much higher (GoTL, 2015b). During 2017, 1066 Timorese workers travelled
overseas to work on either the South Korea Temporary Workers Program (284) or the
Australian SWP (782). Although no figures are available for Timorese who work overseas
outside these official programs, an estimated 16,000–19,000 also live in the UK, including
Northern Ireland (SEJT, 2018b; Wigglesworth & Boxer, 2017). It is not clear what the
impact of the UK’s exit from the European Union will have on opportunities for Timorese
people to work in the UK, or on future remittances.
19
3.3 Lessons from other donors in Timor-Leste
This section addresses KRQ 7.4: What key lessons can be learned from other
bilateral and multilateral donors contributing to workforce development in
Timor‑Leste?
Finding: The workforce development environment in Timor-Leste is challenging.
Key lessons include the need to focus on improving the quality, relevance and
oversight of technical and vocational training delivery and ensuring that there is
sufficient emphasis on practical experience and work-related soft skills.
This section highlights the outcomes from an application of the World Bank’s Systems
Approach for Better Education Results (SABER) diagnostic tool to Timor-Leste, and the
Asian Development Bank’s Mid-Level Skills Training Program (MLSTP). In 2013 the World
Bank carried out an assessment of Timor-Leste’s progress in implementing workforce
development strategy, focused on strategy, system oversight and service delivery.
SABER has been applied in 28 countries to date.
In the case of Timor-Leste, the World Bank concluded that whereas many of the
strategic and system oversight processes were in place, the capacity to deliver results
remained weak. Recommendations for addressing the challenging move from strategy
to implementation included (in summary) improving coordination between ministries and
agencies, undertaking credible assessments of skills demand, defining the role of technical
secondary schools and attendant inclusion in the national quality assurance framework,
helping informal training providers to meet quality control requirements in order to join the
formal structure of training delivery, and strengthening monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for
assessing the system’s performance (World Bank, 2014).
The MLSTP (2012–17) was designed to fill the gap in Timor-Leste’s construction and
automotive trades. The ADB (with a US$12 million grant) and the GoTL (US$1 million)
funded upgrading of buildings, training equipment and the qualifications of instructors in five
training centres. According to a review respondent, and a study of employment outcomes
of the program, the program did not meet its ambitious employment-related targets.
It was noted many trainees did not intend to work afterwards, and that those who wanted
to work often did not have a good understanding of what work involved, lacked soft skills,
and did not have the skills to apply for and be interviewed for work. The importance of
training meeting both market demand and employer requirements were emphasised, with
the need for an identified person in each training centre with responsibility for strengthening
links with industry. The MLSTP produced an oversupply of construction graduates and an
undersupply of automotive graduates. It was determined that only trainees who wanted to
work afterwards should be selected, and that courses needed to have a greater practical
component, be linked with internships, ideally be linked to an apprenticeship system,
and include a core unit of competency about soft skills for the workplace.
20
3.4 Lessons from other countries
This section addresses KRQ 7.2: What are the key lessons that can be learned from
workforce development investments in countries with a comparable context?
It includes reviews of the ADB Good Practice TVET Guide; the DFAT-funded Sri Lanka Skills
for Inclusive Growth Program; the Vanuatu Technical and Vocational Education and Training
Sector Strengthening Program (VTSSP), and its successor the Vanuatu Skills Partnership
(VSP); the Australia-Pacific Technical College (APTC) and its successor, the Australia-
Pacific Training Coalition (APTC3).
Finding: Key lessons from workforce development initiatives in countries with a
comparable context include the need for high-quality TVET training that responds
to the needs of employers and is based on careful analysis of domestic and
international labour market requirements. This can involve focusing on a specific
sector (e.g. hospitality and tourism) and actively identifying points in the value
chain where there is a need for skills training. This may involve using an enterprise
training model that brings together employers and industry, like-minded Timorese
institutions, and Australian training providers. Another key lesson is that there are
clear benefits to taking the long view on workforce development and engaging
in considered adaptation in response to changing circumstances and new
understandings. Over the longer term, and as relationships mature, demonstration of
the value of high-quality, responsive TVET training can be used to build coalitions for
change of the broader TVET system.
The ADB Good Practice in Technical and Vocational Education and Training
Guide is a meta-evaluation that offers three relevant lessons based on assessments of
the strengths and weaknesses of regional ADB projects operating over a 10-year period
(Francis, 2016). Firstly, the most important factor in the success of training is its relevance
to employers and opportunities for employment. Second, the collection and analysis of
labour market information and graduate destination surveys requires a clear and simple
focus, a willingness of agencies to share information, staff trained to analyse the data and
an adequate budget. Thirdly, support for enterprise-based training is important because it
is crucial in raising workforce skills in the major countries of the Asian region. Direct links
between training providers and employers are needed, with “incentives for employers to
take part in directing, advising and evaluating training”. The Guide notes that engaging
with employer advisory councils and associations does not produce the same results as
engaging with specific enterprise needs and concerns.
The Sri Lanka Skills for Inclusive Growth Program is only in the early stages of
implementation, but the design offers four key lessons for a future WDP in Timor‑Leste
(DFAT, 2016). The first is Sri Lanka’s recognition of the inflexibility and lack of
responsiveness of its national TVET system to skills demand. The recommended response
is to develop a flexible and demand-driven skills supply to improve productivity and
incomes. The second lesson is that a WDP should explicitly focus on meeting the skills
needs of enterprises. The third is Sri Lanka’s decision to work with small and medium-sized
enterprises in the tourism sector. The focus here is not only on hospitality and tourism
providers but on other enterprises in the value chain servicing the tourism sector, such
as agriculture and food services, construction and maintenance services, transport and
vehicle maintenance. The fourth lesson is the importance of connecting with other donors
activities in the area of the program’s activity.
21
The Australia-Pacific Training Coalition Stage 3 (APTC3) Investment Design
Document recognises that earlier stages of the APTC demonstrated, amid early
scepticism, the value of delivering high-quality technical and vocational training to over
10,000 students (DFAT, 2017a). APTC has also provided a useful model of quality TVET
delivery for local institutions to learn from, and student and employer satisfaction rates have
been consistently high. The advent of the PLS has resulted in the APTC3 design having
a renewed focus on labour mobility, at the same time as seeking to move away from its
largely “enclave” mode of operation to date, while seeking a catalytic development role with
the national TVET systems in the Pacific.
The new direction proposed anticipates a flexible and adaptable mechanism to solve
collective action problems related to skills training provision and to promote TVET reform
through building broad-based coalitions or partnerships for reform. These are envisaged
as working with like-minded Pacific reformers from enterprises, TVET providers, TVET
systems and civil society, as well as selected Australian partners. The design intends
that the APTC3-led evolving reform coalitions will provide new opportunities to influence
changes to Pacific TVET governance, policymaking and service delivery to become more
demand focused, encourage greater labour mobility, and support private sector growth in
the Pacific. Also included in the outcomes are the use of partnerships with enterprises to
improve employment outcomes for TVET graduates and workplace productivity and the
need to work with national TVET providers to lift their performance. APTC3 is now able
to move to this next strategic stage, premised on APTC’s long engagement and good
reputation in providing quality TVET education.
The scale of APTC3 engagement, coupled with the sole use of English language for
training, are not directly applicable to Timor-Leste. However, lessons can be learnt from
both the extended engagement of TVET and its demonstration of employer-relevant
training, as well as the provision of Australian qualifications that provide pathways to
domestic and international employment. TVET in Timor-Leste could build on and expand
existing collaborations between Timorese institutions and Australian training providers.
A recent independent evaluation of the Vanuatu Technical and Vocational Education
and Training Sector Strengthening Program (VTSSP) (2008–16) produced findings,
from what is widely recognised as a standout program, that are instructive for the
Timor‑Leste context (Schofield et.al., 2015). The evaluators emphasised the importance
of joining up the dimensions of strategy, oversight and service delivery; the agile facilitation
of cross sector cooperation, value-chain approaches; and the value of the long view in
which established relationships allow for an incremental, iterative, participatory and adaptive
approach to both system and organisational change. The program has been successful in
improving income and livelihoods, particularly in the TVET for Tourism subprogram, and has
done well on social inclusion. Like APTC, the program is moving to a new Phase, having
demonstrated a successful model in an environment where the capacity of the national
TVET system has improved and bilateral relationships have matured (DFAT, 2017b).
Outcomes for Phase 4 include the development of local entrepreneurship and the local
private sector; promotion of social inclusion, with a focus on economic empowerment for
women and PWD; the facilitation of flexible domestic and regional training and employment
pathways; and a systems approach, with the skills development system as the vector for
economic growth, to ensure sustainability of the investment. The new design recognises
that there are complex political, systemic, and cultural factors outside of the Program’s
direct control that will influence achievement of outcomes. Like the APTC, and the Tonga
22
Skills Program,3 Phase 4 of the new VSP is focused on ‘thinking and working politically’, in
order to develop strategies that are iterative, monitored, and adjusted so that resources,
relationships and common interests can be leveraged to contribute to change (DFAT, 2017b).
3 The Tonga Skills Program seeks to improve the employability of participants in national and overseas labour markets;
increase productivity in the workplace and potential for earning higher incomes; provide increased access to
entrepreneurial skills to complement technical training for micro, small and medium enterprises; provide equitable
access to skills development services for PWD, women and people in the outer islands; and establish new training
models to influence reforms in the national TVET sector.
4 In 2015 Timor-Leste spent only 8% of its total budget on education, while Indonesia, Vietnam and Thailand spent 18-
20%. Since 2015, Timor-Leste’s education spending has declined to 6%.
5 For the purposes of this review, workforce training provision is taken to include technical secondary schools, TVET
training providers and higher education providers. Despite their important contribution, it does not include general
secondary schools.
23
The post-secondary TVET sector is comprised of approximately 100 training
organisations providing technical and vocational education. Two of these are public
institutions – the Centro Nacional de Emprego e Formaçao Profissional (CNEFP Tibar)
and the Centro Nacional de Formaçao Profissional – Becora (CNFP SENAI) – and the
remainder comprise non-government organisations (NGOs), churches and donor-funded
organisations. Fifty-six training providers are registered with the Secretariat of State for
Youth and Labour (SEJT) and are eligible to receive funding, and 25 are accredited to
deliver national-level qualifications. Completion of secondary school is a requirement of
entry to an accredited training centre.
The TVET sector is often cited by GoTL and international sources as having great potential
for facilitating improved economic outcomes in Timor-Leste (Inder & Cornwell, 2017).
Several donors, including DFAT, ADB and the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale
Zusammenarbeit (German Development Agency – GIZ), have invested in TVET institutions.
However, there challenges to TVET institutions developing a competent workforce.
These include the large number of institutions, low levels of funding, limited effective reach
and capacity of the National Institute for Labour Force Development (INDMO), inadequate
engagement with employers, low levels of enrolment, and perceived low status of TVET
qualifications.
The two public TVET centres are funded directly from the State Budget, with a total
allocation in 2017 of US$673,000. The main funding for the private or community training
centres comes from the Human Capital Development Fund (HCDF), but does not appear
to be allocated to all centres (GoTL, 2017b). Interviews with training centres reveal that
SEPFOPE always reduced the budget they requested, by amounts that varied greatly
from year to year, but often to below basic operating costs. This is a barrier to paying the
statutory minimum wage to trainers.
With INDMO’s quality assurance limited to accredited institutions, comprising less than
25% of the total, approximately 75% of the sector is not quality assured according to
national standards. The importance of training centres being accredited to international
standards, in order to facilitate improved Timorese access to international labour markets,
is explicit in the National Employment Strategy. Unfortunately, it became apparent to
the review team that there was a mistaken belief within INDMO that Timorese national
qualifications are equivalent to Australian qualifications and likely to receive international
recognition, when in general this is not the case; future labour mobility will suffer if this
misconception is not addressed. It is noted, however, there is a case of a Certificate III in
the Timor-Leste National Qualification Framework that is of a higher level than the Australian
equivalent.
Although INDMO has established sector-specific industry sub-commissions to provide
input into the national training system, there is a weak link between TVET institutions and
employers. Whereas donor-funded training and qualifications are demand driven, other
qualifications tend to be supply driven. A focus on the supply side has produced a TVET
system with low relevance. In interviews the review team frequently heard from employers
that they would prefer to carry out their own training, or employ qualified foreign workers,
rather than rely on Timor-Leste’s TVET system, which was seen as being of low relevance
and quality, with little opportunity for students to practice technical skills. Some employers
noted that they recruited for attitude over skills, emphasising that soft skills, as well as
technical skills, are critical to employability.
24
Two tracer studies further illustrate these weak links between the TVET system and
employers. The 2014 SEPFOPE system-wide survey of TVET graduates showed that only
27% were in employment at the time of the survey (SEPFOPE, 2014); the employment
rate for graduates of the better-resourced ADB MLSTP over several years was 41–46%
(Francis, 2016).6 This is further demonstrated by the Enterprise and Skills Survey (ESS)
data for 2016 and 2017, which shows that TVET graduates from training centres only
accounted for 6% of all employees hired for the period 2015 to June 2017. The employers
who do recruit TVET training centre graduates focus on just a few TVET training centres,
with 85% being recruited from Dom Bosco (47%), CNEFP Tibar (16%), Salele (12%) and
CNFP SENAI (9%) (SEJT, 2018a; SEPFOPE, 2016).
Lack of engagement with the TVET sector is not confined to employers. Only 12% of
Timorese progress from secondary school to TVET training, which compares unfavourably
with Indonesia’s 41% and Thailand’s 34%. Lack of uptake is in part due to a belief that
TVET training does not lead to employment, but also due to the low status of TVET training
(Francis, 2014). However, data from the SEJT Labour Market Information System database
indicates that of those who are unemployed, 67% are looking for opportunities to do
vocational training.
High-performing TVET programs that respond to employer requirements can be supported
through setting up enterprise-based training.7 Flexible training delivery modes could
respond to employer needs for specific skill sets8 and link with Australian institutions and
qualifications where appropriate. The current WDPTL program has achieved positive
outcomes through supporting the development of hospitality qualifications and partnering
with Charles Darwin University for upskilling trainers and developing learning resources.
DFAT is currently investing in a hospitality training centre in partnership with CNEFP. Donor-
funded support for enterprise-based training offers the opportunity to demonstrate the
value of demand-focused TVET.
The higher education sector comprises one public (Universidade Nasionál Timór
Lorosa’e – UNTL) and 11 private institutions, most of which offer technical education.
UNTL received an allocation of US$2.95m in the 2017 budget. This compares
unfavourably with the allocation of US$70m (from the HCDF) over four years to 2017 for
scholarships to study at 226 overseas universities. Other Timorese universities rely on
significant fees from students. The GoTL has recently inaugurated the first of three planned
polytechnic institutes in Betano, Manufahi for the provision of technical education in the
areas of agriculture, livestock and engineering, though it is understood to be inadequately
resourced. The Polytechnic Institute for Hospitality and Tourism in Lospalos and an Academy
for Fisheries and Marine Studies in Manatuto have not yet been constructed (GoTL, 2017c).
There are no tracer studies of employment outcomes for UNTL and the review team is
unaware of any for other universities. Interviews with employers indicated that graduates
were often seen as unprepared for work, either in terms of academic standard or soft skills.
Limited analysis conducted by SEJT suggests a serious oversupply of university graduates
for the private sector and little unmet demand (SEJT, 2018b).
6 Francis (2016) noted that a major barrier to increasing the number of graduates of the ADB MLSTP obtaining a job after
graduation was that one in five students did not actually intend to do so.
7 A good example of this is the Dili-based construction company Community Housing Limited, which became a
registered training provider to deliver its own Level III clay bricks qualification on-site at building sites in Suai. Graduates
who performed well were then offered ongoing employment with the company.
8 Skill sets are Australian training terminology and consist of units of competency drawn from one or more training
packages to suit the individual needs of a business.
25
It is of note that the average seasonal worker from Timor-Leste, unlike other sending
countries, is university educated (World Bank, 2018a). With a small private sector in
Timor-Leste, the public service, comprising 38,000 people, could be expected to absorb
a significant proportion of university graduates, yet analysis conducted by a GoA adviser
indicates only 6% of the civil service has a Bachelor’s degree, 1.9% a Masters’ degree,
and 0.3% a PhD. There are no graduate entry programs in the civil service, and obtaining a
Masters’ degree is no guarantee of a promotion. Based on experiences in similar countries
in the Asia-Pacific region, and Australia’s links to labour mobility programs, the Australian
development program would be well placed to focus on the TVET sector in country, while
continuing to support the expansion of scholarships for targeted tertiary study in Australia.
Recommendation 1: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should include an
emphasis on quality TVET training in-country that can close existing labour skill
gaps and meet the needs of prospective domestic and international employers.
26
Identifying priority sectors
The review identified sectors with potential to grow Timor-Leste’s non-oil economy, either
through the generation of export revenue or by producing goods and services that replace
imports. It also identified where past and future donor investments provide a strong
supporting environment for generating commercial activity, especially in areas of large
population.
Export income is critical for a country like Timor-Leste where the economy is at an
early stage of development and as yet has insufficient “critical mass” to rely on economic
development through domestic demand. The sectors that generate export revenue now
are coffee, tourism and labour services. Of these, the most important sector in terms of
revenue generated is the export of labour services, with remittances a source of income
for one in five households (World Bank, 2018a). Over US$40 million was remitted in
2017 from Timorese living and working overseas, made up of over 85,000 individual
payments. The majority of remittances (US$27 million) came from the UK. Coffee earns
between US$10 million and US$20 million annually (World Bank, 2018b). Tourism in 2014
is estimated to have generated US$14 million from 55,000 visitors (SEJT, 2018b). These
numbers need to be kept in perspective as they are likely to include all non-Timorese
arrivals that do not have a work permit, rather than just tourists.
With negligible manufacturing in Timor-Leste, one of the principal import substitution
opportunities relates to foodstuffs, which comprised about US$90m in 2016. This is
predominantly in the area of cereals (rice) and meat, with much smaller amounts of items
such as eggs, honey, and fats and oils (SEJT, 2018b). Producing these foodstuffs locally is
likely to contribute moderately to employment.
Coffee is grown by 27.5% of Timorese households, but yields are low, and the households
that rely on coffee for their livelihood are likely to be poor (Freedman, 2016). The United
States Agency for International Development (USAID) has made substantial investment
in crop rehabilitation, intercropping and crop diversification to improve coffee farm
management in rural uplands.9 However, it is through the “de-commodification”10 of
Timorese coffee that a niche development market is starting to emerge. This requires not
only improvements in productivity and quality, but marketing of specialty coffee based
on origin and production processes, with attendant certification, quality assurance and
branding (Freedman, 2016).
Tourism has considerable potential, as identified by the GoTL’s Tourism Strategy, which
seeks to bring 200,000 foreign tourists to Timor-Leste annually by 2030, to increase
tourism jobs by 15,000 and to generate US$150 million in annual tourism revenue (USAID,
2018). In order to achieve these projections Timor-Leste will need to compete with
destinations that provide better value for money; and overcome the current requirement to
import skills at managerial and supervisory levels.
The GoA-funded Market Development Facility (MDF) is currently partnering with tour
operators, a handicraft producer group, a handicraft reseller and boutique hotels. MDF
provides support to strengthen linkages back to producers, invest in infrastructure and
skills development of the workers and suppliers, and improve sales and marketing.
https://www.usaid.gov/timor-leste/project-descriptions/consolidating-cooperative-agribusiness-recovery-timor-leste
9
10 De-commodification in relation to coffee refers to direct sourcing of specialty coffees, rather than pegging prices to a
wildly fluctuating world market. For even more premium pricing it may involve marketing of specific growers.
27
These activities all have an emphasis on creating job and skill development opportunities
for women in non-agricultural sectors where women’s participation is currently very low.
They are also working with destination marketing companies to help address presently
limited country branding (MDF, 2016).
USAID has invested in a three-year project called Turizmu ba Ema Hotu (Tourism for All)
to market Timor-Leste as an off-the-beaten-path destination for adventure travellers and
eco-tourists. The project will work to improve and increase the tourism workforce, aiming
to create an additional 1,000 tourism-related jobs. In addition, USAID estimates the project
will stimulate US$25 million in eco-tourism and community-based tourism investment and
help raise household incomes in targeted communities by 15% over three years (USAID,
2018). Some entrepreneurs are starting to explore the potential of linking specialty coffee
“experiences” through niche tourism marketing (Freedman, 2016).
The Australian development program has invested A$25 million for the period 2016–21 in
the agricultural livelihoods program TOMAK (Farming for Prosperity). The opportunity
exists to stimulate local markets for commercial vegetable and fruit crops to boost import
replacement and achieve export opportunities in the longer term. The program aims to
support rural entrepreneurs, aspiring commercial farmers and subsistence households
in chosen livelihood zones which are conducive to the production of commercial
agriculture. This project has the potential to both improve incomes and address food
insecurity. USAID’s Developing Agricultural Communities program, now replaced by the
Avansa Agrikultura Project, supported the engagement of over 500 farmers in horticulture
production in Aileu and Ainaro, averaging a return of almost US$2,000/annum/household.
Many communities are now replicating this model with the help of the GoTL and other
development partners (DFAT, 2015).
MDF has supported several agro-enterprises to get more agro-inputs to farms and
generated positive results. Interviews conducted with four MDF-supported enterprises
show the potential for rural entrepreneurs with access to credit to act as brokers and
provide finance and advice to help commercial farmers succeed. MDF aims to work more
with TOMAK in selected districts to support its work in agro-commodity production
(MDF, 2016).
In relation to the export of labour services, Australia has made a considerable financial
and diplomatic investment since 2012 in setting up and supporting the GoTL to respond
to job offers from Australian employers. SWP numbers in Timor-Leste have the potential
to increase between 10 and 20 times by 2040, based on medium-growth and high-
growth scenario-based forecasts made by the Australian National University and the
World Bank (Curtain et.al., 2017). There is strong potential for SWP to link with existing
rural development investments supporting commercial agriculture by recruiting from those
areas. Future program support for SWP can be designed to support, on a continuing
basis, returning workers to develop businesses related to the commercial supply chain
being developed in their home area. Another option for generating savings for investment in
community tourism is for SWP to recruit Timorese from rural coastal areas, where USAID is
setting up destination stewardship councils, to help communities to manage local tourism
sites and eco-tourism activities (USAID, 2018).
With a contraction of the private sector, Korea, Australia and elsewhere have been
the major sources of jobs for low-skilled Timorese workers, especially those from rural
backgrounds. The SWP increased the number of jobs taken up by Timorese from 12 in
2012 to 35 in 2013, to 298 in 2016, and to 781 in 2017.
28
The South Korea Employment Permit System, which offers low-skilled temporary work,
has provided jobs for between 100 and 500 Timorese each year to 2017 (SEJT, 2018b).
While to date the largest source of remittances has been from Europe, it is not clear what
the impact of the UK’s exit from the European Union will have on opportunities for Timorese
people to work in the UK, or on future remittances.
Skills shortages
There are currently significant skills shortages and gaps in Timor-Leste in the formal
sector and in rural agriculture. Published data and interviews with employers and an
employment agency show that in the private sector skill shortages are sometimes filled
by foreign workers (SEJT, 2018a). Approximately 9% of the total workforce are foreign
employees, including 32% of craft and related trade workers, 24% of managers, and 20%
of professionals (SEJT, 2018b).
Two published sources of data identify current non-agricultural skill gaps.
The ESS 2017 notes that the workers most in demand are civil engineering labourers,
shop sales assistants, earthmoving and related plant operators, other building workers,
shopkeepers, accounting and bookkeeping clerks, motor vehicle mechanics and repairers,
and air conditioning and refrigeration mechanics. The 2018 Labour Market Outlook Report
identifies the occupations of foreign work permit holders, which include cooks/chefs,
bricklayers, shop supervisors, carpenters, restaurant managers, mechanics, electricians,
welders, motorcycle mechanics and master bakers. Although there are differences in these
lists, there are overlaps, and critically most require vocational training. As new opportunities
in tourism and commercial agriculture develop, these skills will be of increasing importance.
In addition, MDF has noted that as new job opportunities are created, new skills are
required (MDF, 2016). These may differ from the currently identified skills shortages.
Skills will be needed to support investments in tourism, development of commercial
agriculture, and supporting services related to the agricultural supply chain that emphasise
value-adding to natural products. Identifying these skills at a more specific level, and on an
iterative basis, will require close collaboration with GoTL, GoA and other donor investments
discussed in this document.
Interviews indicated a need for the development of leadership and management skills in
the Timorese public sector. Although the public sector is currently at capacity in terms of
numbers, an increased skill level would assist development of an enabling environment for
improved job creation.
Labour shortages in rural areas are another key constraint to improving agricultural
production (TOMAK, 2016). Inder and Cornwell (2017) argue these shortages are
explained by six key causes: complacency, rural–urban migration, lack of return for effort
(low incomes at harvest time), alternative employment options that are more lucrative
than working the land, the Veteran’s Pension, and nutritional constraints limiting physical
exertion by households. They go on to argue that all of these factors can be addressed
by increasing productivity of labour, defined as income/return per day of work invested.
This means farmers must have the resources to invest in simple labour-saving tools and
equipment, as well as inputs such as seeds, fertiliser and pest management that improve
crop yield. They also note the importance of support for communities to work together to
share equipment, knowledge and experience.
29
Recommendation 2: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should focus on
supporting the development of skills that can contribute to the development
of identified export industries such as coffee, tourism and labour services,
and the development of commercial agriculture to enable import substitution.
Over the longer term it will be important to take a broad and responsive view of
the technical and business skills required to support diversified value chains in
these areas.
30
export of labour to the UK are the biggest current contributors.12 The forthcoming PLS is of
particular note and is discussed below.
The SWP shows all signs of continuing to expand and for Timor-Leste to be a major source
of these workers. This expansion will be further helped by new measures announced by
the GoA “to further support employers and seasonal workers to access the Seasonal
Worker Programme” (Cash, 2017). These include efforts to increase the number of
employers taking on seasonal workers, lowering upfront costs for employers, improving
visa arrangements and reducing the reporting requirements for employers. The workforce
demands will arise not only from the additional seasonal workers themselves, but also from
the increased requirement to manage the process, and to actively leverage opportunities
for returned workers to contribute to ongoing development in Timor-Leste.
Opportunities for semi-skilled work in Australia on a Temporary Skilled Work Visa also
exist for Timorese workers through the Northern Territory Designated Area Migration
Agreement (NT DAMA).13 Under this agreement, employers can seek approval from the
NT Government to offer jobs to overseas workers in nominated occupations below the
standard skills threshold. As well, many of the nominated occupations have a reduced
English language requirement and, in some cases, a lower income threshold.
The semi-skilled occupations relevant for Timor-Leste include accounts clerk, bar attendant
supervisor, barista, general earthmoving plant operator, agricultural and horticultural mobile
plant operator, general truck driver, tyre fitter and waiter supervisor. The qualifications
required for non-supervisor occupations, except barista, are Australian Qualifications
Framework (AQF) or equivalent Certificate II, together with at least three years relevant
post-qualification work experience. Supervisor and barista positions require AQF or
equivalent Certificate IV and one to two years post-qualification work experience.
31
Timor-Leste through partnerships between Timorese training institutions, Australian training
providers and industry.
Upgrading and expanding the current focus on hospitality training to ensure alignment
with the AQF should be the first priority, as this provides both labour mobility options and a
source of skilled people for a domestic tourism industry and hospitality services. Subsidiary
occupations in the tourism value chain and hospitality services should be added to this
process over time to service the emergent market. People who have worked in the SWP
accommodation sector in Australia are well placed to take advantage of these opportunities
due to sector-specific skills, together with an understanding of Australian work expectations
and higher levels of English. Opportunities for Timorese with a national-level Certificate III
and with relevant work experience of two years or more to undertake a relevant Australian-
recognised qualification at Certificate III level at APTC over a period of 22 weeks could
also be investigated. Careful consideration should be given to whether to pursue support
for Australian-level qualifications in aged care, child care and disability for the PLS, as it is
unlikely this training can be utilised to any great extent in Timor-Leste upon return.
Recommendation 3: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should support
initiatives that will position Timor-Leste for improved labour mobility
opportunities. These should include continuing support for the development
of GoTL capacity to manage expanded involvement in the SWP, as well as the
development of relevant Australian-level qualifications in Timor-Leste suitable for
participation in the PLS and other labour migration opportunities. Ideally these
skills, or components of them, will also be relevant for the domestic tourist and
commercial agriculture market.
32
4. DFAT’s current investments in
workforce development in
Timor-Leste
4.1 Overview of current investments
This section provides an evaluation of the WDPTL. However, other DFAT investments in
Timor-Leste with a workforce development focus were of relevance to the review, and
possible increased synergies between these investments and a future WDP in Timor-Leste
are considered below. These investments include the Labour Mobility Assistance Program
(LMAP), TOMAK, GfD and the MDF.
14 SEJT was previously known as the Secretariat of State for Vocational Training and Employment Policy (SEPFOPE).
33
skills development and employment. This component invests in Timor-Leste’s
vocational training and employment in three areas:
skills development – supporting improved engagement between the government
and the private sector to develop quality skills, primarily in the hospitality sector,
and supporting the capacity of training institutions to develop and deliver
accredited training programs;
employment – improving access to the labour market and expanding overseas
employment opportunities, by preparing seasonal workers selected to work in
Australia;
institutional support – improved capacity of the labour market surveys and
information system and capacity development of SEJT directorates;
Australia Timor-Leste English Language Program. ATELP continued English
language training (ELT) to improve English language standards in particular sectors and
for work readiness.
A summary of progress towards EOPOs until December 2017 is given in Table 2 below.
It notes the achievements of WDPTL, as well the achievements of others facilitated by
WDPTL support, often with significant preparatory work. These achievements are covered
in more detail in progress reporting for 2016 and 2017 (WDPTL, 2017 & 2018). Given the
early stage of much of this work, and the way it has been reported, a lot of this detail is still
at the output level. However, with additional M&E, it can be expected to result in further
demonstrable outcomes by the end of the program.
EOPO PROGRESS
Improved Improved business processes in INDMO, LSU and DNIMT
policy and 2016 and 2017 ESS Surveys completed and disseminated
systems for
Capacity building for evidence-based planning supported through additional labour market information collection, analysis and
workforce
dissemination
development
Development of a suite of five TVET hospitality qualifications in both Food and Beverage Services and Accommodation
Services supported the rapidly expanding hospitality sector
Selection of a Hospitality Training Centre of Excellence
Infrastructure upgrades at SENAI NT English Language Centre (Becora) and CNEFP to facilitate PWD access and
hospitality training
Enhance potential for training delivery in 2018
More people Improved access to the labour market through briefing, training and deployment of rapidly increasing numbers of Timorese for
workforce the successful SWP program (298 seasonal workers in 2016, 782 in 2017)
ready Development of training capability for Timor-Leste’s hospitality industry with a Hospitality Advanced Trainer Program for 15
hospitality trainers from 10 training centres, and training workshops for 148 staff members from six major hotels
Selection, deployment and support to Australia Awards scholarship (AAS) awardees, and ongoing support to AAS alumni (273
AAS alumni as at December 2017)
GoTL workplace internships for five AAS alumni
ELT for 21 TVET trainers, 48 secondary school teachers and 15 PWD
Program 93% of alumni in employment as at May 2017
beneficiaries 90% of TVET trainers either strongly agreed or agreed that the training will benefit them in their work
utilise
100% of secondary teachers strongly agreed or agreed that the training will benefit them in their work
their skills,
experience, or Tracer studies indicate earnings of $5–10,000 for horticulture SWPs and $10–15,000 for hospitality SWPs
income Formation of a Hospitality Trainers Association
34
4.2 Contribution to workforce readiness
This section addresses KRQ 5: To what extent have DFAT investments led to more
people being workforce ready?
15 DFAT support for the SWP in Timor-Leste occurs through inputs from both WDPTL and the DFAT Pacific-funded
LMAP. DFAT funds LMAP to provide assistance to countries participating in the SWP to improve the supply and
quality of seasonal workers, strengthen linkages with Australian employers, and maximise development impacts of the
SWP.
35
Scholarships and alumni support
Finding: DFAT’s support for scholarships and alumni make a small but important
contribution, in a crowded scholarship landscape, to more Timorese being work-
ready. The number of AAS could be increased by exploring a range of co-funding,
sponsorship and partnership arrangements. There was consensus among the great
majority of stakeholders interviewed that the AAS scheme should support a better
mix of undergraduate and postgraduate study and short courses.
Australia’s support for scholarships and alumni make a small16 but valuable contribution to
more Timorese being work-ready. WDPTL provides a variety of support, including intake
planning, promotion of awards, selection and assessment, course advice and institutional
placement, limited on-award support, pre-departure briefings, reintegration and alumni
support. Between 2007 and 2018, 279 AAS and 271 short-term Australia Awards were
made. The program reports high completion rates. However, analysis of student outcome
data indicates that there are students who do not complete due to inadequate academic
progress. For 2018, Timor-Leste has received 18 AAS and 20 short-term awards.
Australian scholarships form a very small proportion of the total number of scholarships
available in Timor-Leste for international study. The total number of scholarships provided
for Timor-Leste citizens, and from which sources and at what level, is unknown.
Nevertheless, HCDF has allocated US$70m over four years to 2017 for scholarships to
study at 226 overseas universities, and other scholarships are available from New Zealand,
United States, Korea, Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines.17
According to the 2017 alumni survey, 93% of alumni who graduated in the previous two
years were employed, with 37% working in government institutions, 32% in NGOs and
24% in the private sector (WDPTL, 2017). 18 GoA programs such as GfD report actively
seeking out high-performing alumni. The majority of alumni confirmed they were using
their skills in their current employment. The growing number of Australia Awards alumni in
positions of influence in Timor-Leste, with good personal and professional connections
to Australia, is itself a useful outcome that should be fostered in a future WDP. Awardees
report high overall levels of satisfaction, and Timorese alumni report more positive views
than the global average about studying in Australia.
In the 2016 intake the AAS in Timor-Leste stopped funding Bachelor-level study, and is
now focused on Masters-level study, with Bachelor-level degrees only being available
to PWD. This reduces the expenditure required per scholarship, but is not a popular
policy shift. There is widespread demand for a more balanced mix of undergraduate,
postgraduate and short-course scholarships, with an emphasis on undergraduate level.
Alumni were of the view that good foundational university qualifications, including the
attendant soft skills and exposure to a different world view, were such a priority for
Timor-Leste that AAS should focus on undergraduate and TVET qualifications based on
labour market need.19 Alumni believed that if the choice was between a smaller number of
16 AAS for Timor-Leste form less than 3% of AAS scholarships for East Asia, and less than 2% of global AAS. During
2018 Timor-Leste (with a population of 1.21m) received a similar number of AAS to Vanuatu (with a population of
271,000).
17 Government of New Zealand offers 15 scholarships annually from undergraduate to postgraduate level.
18 The survey achieved only a 58% response rate, so this may overstate the case.
19 Another respondent was firmly of the view that there were more than enough Masters and PhD graduates, many of
whom struggled to find work commensurate with their studies. A third respondent also noted that gaining a Master’s
degree was no guarantee of promotion in the public service.
36
undergraduate scholarships and a larger number of Masters scholarships, the first option
represented better value for money.
A range of reintegration activities for alumni are held, and it is likely that these will
increasingly involve the recently re-formed Alumni Association. The Association is being
provided with support, an Alumni secretariat coordinator has been appointed, and in
early 2018 an annual general meeting was held and office bearers elected. Although
the potential is there, it is too soon to make an assessment of the contribution of the
Association to more Timorese graduates being able to utilise their skills and experience.
There are three key challenges in relation to AAS. Firstly, it is recognised that scholarships
are overwhelmingly awarded to people who already have significant social capital, and
that this social capital is cumulative – if you receive one scholarship you are better placed
to receive another. The challenge is how to improve access to AAS to those who do not
already have these social advantages, notably women, PWD and those living in rural areas.
McWilliam (2014) notes the persistence of economic inequality between those living in urban
and rural locations, with 92% of the high-wealth quintile occurring in urban areas. A second
(and related) challenge is that the number of AAS is very small; increasing the number of
scholarships without an increase in budget will be difficult. The third challenge is to ensure
the priority areas targeted for Australian scholarships are responding to labour market priorities.
One of the best ways to increase the contribution of Australian scholarships is to have
more of them. Within a limited Australian development program budget this can best
occur through co-funding, sponsorship and other partnership arrangements. For degrees
such as medicine, which would not normally be funded by AAS due to the length of time
required, it may be possible to co-fund degrees with the GoTL’s HCDF if this was seen
to be beneficial to Timor-Leste’s development. The possibility of enterprises sponsoring
scholarships – potentially for their employees, with a guarantee of work upon return –
should also be explored.20 Other beneficial arrangements could include partnering with
the HCDF, which currently funds most scholarships in Timor-Leste. The HCDF could fund,
in whole or in part, selected AAS scholarships, while benefiting from the added support
offered by the Australia Awards system.
Separate from any co-funding or partnership arrangements for scholarships, graduates
can be linked with potential employers at an early stage, including during pre-departure
briefings. Alumni, in FGDs, were of the view that this contact could be intensified in the
year before graduation. There is an opportunity during the Christmas break, when many
scholarship holders return to Timor-Leste, to be linked with Timorese employers in the
January or February before returning to Australia.21
The WDPTL has a multi-sectoral Scholarships Management Group (SMG) to assist with
setting direction for Australian Awards in Timor-Leste. However, the role of the SMG is not
clear for the WDPTL and the SMG members, and governance arrangements for a future
WDP should be carefully planned.
Recommendation 5: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should continue to
support Australia Awards scholarships and alumni, explore opportunities for
co-funding to increase the availability of scholarships, ensure the relevance of
qualifications pursued, and consider increasing the emphasis on undergraduate
training.
20 In Papua New Guinea Exxon-Mobil sponsors AAS; and provides support costs to the broader AAS program.
21 AAS noted that many awardees returned to Timor-Leste for Christmas and would often not return to Australia until
February, providing an opportunity for a structured engagement with employers upon return.
37
ATELP and other English Language Training
Finding: Currently the WDPTL is unable to meet the high demand for ELT.
Although the ATELP component of the program has been of short duration there
have been some positive outcomes. However, the program approach to ELT is
fragmented and needs consolidation and integration. It is difficult to demonstrate
the contribution of the ELC or English for secondary school teachers to work
readiness. ELT should be prioritised for workforce development investments such as
labour mobility, TVET training, scholarships and social inclusion activities. Although
current levels of ELT make an important contribution to the work readiness of both
SWP candidates and TVET trainers, it is unlikely to be sufficient to enable them to
be competitive against foreign workers in Timor-Leste or citizens of Pacific Island
countries with better English levels for the PLS.
English language skills play a significant role in improving employability, economic growth
and global and regional partnerships. Australia, as Timor-Leste’s closest English-speaking
neighbour, is well placed to support the country’s English language aspirations. However,
there is significant unmet demand for ELT in Timor-Leste, including from employers where
English is important for their business, and within GoTL, that the program cannot meet.
An independent assessment needs to be made as to whether current national-level
qualifications in English language are sufficient for the standard required by domestic
employers or employers in Australia. This assessment should also identify which national
providers of English language training can meet the standards, as assessed by an
independent audit. This will help inform the targeting of future support and the most
effective way of providing ELT in Timor-Leste.
The WDPTL has supported ELT through all components of the program. ATELP 22 is under
Component 3: Human Resource Development – Emerging Priorities of the WDPTL, but
ELT support has separately been provided to seasonal workers and scholarship applicants
under the other two components of the program.
The ATELP has provided the following kinds of support:
material resources for the ELC at UNTL;
English language training for 21 TVET trainers;
English language training for 48 current secondary school teachers; and
English for Employability training for 15 PWD.
It is difficult to demonstrate the contribution of the ELC or English for secondary school
teachers to work readiness. Looking to the future, one of the challenges for TVET trainers
and SWP candidates is that their current levels of English will need further development to
enable them to be competitive against foreign workers in Timor-Leste, or TVET graduates
from Pacific countries in the forthcoming PLS. Both of these groups are likely to have
higher levels of native or near-native English language.
The Senai NT English Language Centre (Senai NT) provides Australian-level English
language qualifications through the support of the NT Government and in association with
Batchelor Institute. However, it is unclear whether NT Government support will continue
beyond the end of 2018. This successful model could be extended through GoA
co-funding of Senai NT, and expanding the model of teaching English to an Australian
22 ATELP builds on the former Timor-Leste English Language Program which ran from 2011 to 2016.
38
or regional standard to other training centres in cooperation with an Australian or equivalent
educational institution. If successful, this model could be rolled out to other beneficiary
groups over a much longer period of time. Some of the other national English language
qualifications have accreditations through other international organisations, and the
acceptability of these for future labour market opportunities can be investigated.
WDPTL master trainers have been used for ELT for TVET trainers and secondary school
teachers, while Senai NT has delivered PWD English for Employability. Although the
review team understands that the WDPTL master trainers are a valuable resource, a future
iteration of the program should consider supporting existing institutions to partner with
Australian institutions to teach English to an Australian standard.
Recommendation 6: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should continue to
support ELT as a priority and undertake targeted and independent assessments
to strengthen its delivery. These assessments should include ELT learning
outcomes to date, and whether the current standard of English is adequate
for labour mobility, domestic tourism and hospitality purposes. ELT for SWP,
AAS, PWD and TVET trainers should continue, but ELT for secondary school
teachers and support for the UNTL ELC should not. ELT should be integrated
into all other program activities as appropriate and be delivered through existing
training institutions, which could be co-funded by GoA, and strengthened
through partnerships with institutions from Australia or Timor-Leste (where those
institutions deliver to the Australian standard).
39
Institutional strengthening activities carried out by WDPTL in conjunction with LMAP led to
an increased capacity of LSU staff to administer the SWP, respond to increased demand
and to employer, worker and other stakeholders’ needs. LSU were also supported to
organise a successful conference in Dili for Australian employers. Eighteen employers
from all states and territories (except South Australia) attended and provided input on
improvements for preparation and support for seasonal workers while on assignment in
Australia. A review respondent reported that this experience made LSU staff aware of
the importance of direct information about employer preferences as the primary basis for
selecting workers.
The ability of the three heads of department within INDMO to engage with industry and
other stakeholders has developed significantly, as well as their ability to administer INDMO’s
quality assurance system. The foundations for delivery of training in 2018 have been put in
place through upgrading the skills of hospitality trainers.
The capacity limitations identified by WDPTL include limited relationships and coordination
between employers, training centres and other stakeholders; inadequate and out-of-date
hospitality qualifications being delivered by a small number of training centres; lack of
evidence base to inform decision-making about labour market demand and funding for
vocational training; and limited administrative and management capacity of government
counterparts including inadequate internal and external communication, coordination
and planning.
It is noted that improved capacity within INDMO is not commensurate with the high levels
of support provided by development partners, with the organisation not yet embracing
an outward-focused, customer-oriented approach. INDMO also remains burdened by
a complex and inflexible National Qualifications Framework that does not meet regional
standards and lacks flexibility to adapt to changing industry requirements.
There is currently limited evidence of SEJT utilising labour market data. However, in an
interview an informant identified five main users of the information that DNIMT provide.
These are the training centres, which use it to base their training courses on the jobs in
demand; SEJT employment centres offering advice to job seekers; and private sector
employers looking for workers with a particular skill. In addition, donors came to DNIMT
seeking information on available skills and levels of education of the workforce for a
project in a specific area, and new investors also came seeking workforce labour market
information on skills available in specific locations.
Although approximately one-third of AAS alumni enter GoTL positions, there appears to be
no specific policy or effort to take advantage of their skills. If the Civil Service Commission
(CSC) undertakes a mooted process of workforce planning in the near future, it could
– in conjunction with GfD – propose a graduate entry program for the public service.
A key structural challenge is that although the CSC is responsible for workforce planning,
all scholarship opportunities provided by GoTL are through the HCDF, which has no
relationship with the CSC but rather bilateral relationships with ministries.
Recommendation 7: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should continue to
support GoTL capacity to analyse and disseminate labour market information and
manage labour mobility programs.
Recommendation 8: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should demonstrate
the value of establishing high-quality Australian-standard TVET qualifications that
respond to international and domestic demand to drive domestic TVET reform.
40
4.4 Approaches and partners
This section addresses KRQ 4: To what extent do DFAT investments promote
the right mix of approaches and partners to maximise workforce development
in Timor-Leste? It also addresses the related KRQ 7.3: How can DFAT’s other
investments in Timor-Leste be maximally leveraged to contribute to workforce
development?
Finding: Work with the GoTL has had positive outcomes and simultaneously
revealed limitations; the range of partners and approaches can be broadened to
respond to changing circumstances and emerging opportunities.
Finding: The program’s work to include women and marginalised people has been
strong but could be further integrated into all aspects of a new WDP. Challenges
for PWD include low school completion, which prevents them from accessing
post-secondary education, and discriminatory work practices which make it
harder to find employment. WDPTL has ensured greater access for women and
marginalised people and has provided a beneficial “stepping stone” approach in
recognition of limited opportunities for PWD to directly access employment and training.
WDPTL is a well-managed program with committed, knowledgeable and well-respected
staff that have contributed to the work readiness of Timorese. Current strengths include
support for the SWP program and better labour market information collection and
dissemination, support for nascent development of hospitality qualifications designed to
meet employer requirements, scholarship support and gender and social inclusion.
In Timor-Leste women’s labour force participation rate is 21.3%, one of the lowest in the
world, and significant barriers to workforce participation also exist for PWD. WDPTL’s
work to include women and marginalised people has been strong and can continue to be
strengthened in a future WDP. A WDPTL gender and social inclusion (GESI) strategy was
completed in November 2017 (WDPTL, 2016). The program has been most successful
in the scholarships component of the program, where it aims for gender balance for AAS
recipients and in the PWD English for Employability program, to provide ELT training for
PWD to enable improved access to the Australia Awards program, and the availability of
scholarships for PWD from Diploma level up at a time when only Masters scholarships
were being awarded more generally. However, the gap between current educational
attainment and access to work and study opportunities remains very large.
The GESI strategy notes that the number of women in Timor in the SWP is higher than in
other participating countries. However, women, PWD and rural populations face structural
and programmatic barriers to SWP access.
WDPTL has been limited by its short duration. A long-term approach will allow it to
sequence initiatives, better leverage GoTL reform processes when possible,
and ensure forward planning is based on feedback from program monitoring, evaluation
and learning systems. Under a longer-term program it will be possible to work with existing
institutions rather than setting up parallel delivery systems. By way of example, this would
mean working with competent ELT centres rather than using trainers located inside the program.
The current mix of partners and approaches will need to be modified in a new iteration of
the program (there will be little opportunity for this to occur within the remaining few months
of the WDPTL). While engagement with GoTL will remain important, it has produced
mixed outcomes to date. There are many prospects for greater engagement with the
41
private sector in all areas of the program. If Timor-Leste is to take advantage of new labour
mobility opportunities and respond to the needs of international and domestic employers,
considerable support will need to be provided to developing a fit-for-purpose TVET system.
ELT will remain critical but needs to be integrated with other activities, through partnerships
between Australian tertiary/TVET institutions and receptive Timorese training centres
committed to verifiable outcomes. Similarly, support for ELT can be gradually moved to
institutions such as Senai NT and LELI that utilise Australian English language certifications,
while exploring more extensive partnerships.
Over the longer term the WDPTL could achieve more systemic change and better
outcomes in workforce development through building effective coalitions for change,
as has been successfully achieved in places such as Vanuatu through the VTSSP.
By way of example, one type of coalition for change23 focused on maximising outcomes
for returned seasonal workers could consist of key people from relevant programs, relevant
government agencies and involved NGOs in specific areas. Another type of coalition for
change could identify and support training and labour mobility pathways for beneficiaries
of SWP, and could consist of the following stakeholders: Pacific Labour Facility, selected
national TVET providers and international TVET providers such as Charles Darwin
University, Australian SWP tourist employers, and relevant government agencies interested
in and supportive of change. A third type of coalition for change could focus on returning
AAS graduates to identify suitable ways they can use their skills to good effect, not just in
terms of appropriate employment but community engagement. One proposal is for recent
AAS graduates to work to support a coalition for change of Australian and other overseas
graduates who are interested in an area of major policy reform. Two examples given
were developing a national building code or proposals for urban planning to reduce traffic
congestion.
Recommendation 9: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should continue to
work with GoTL but put greater emphasis on partnering with industry, employers
and Australian institutions in all areas.
Recommendation 10: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should greatly
increase support for labour mobility opportunities in and establish linkages with
the commercial agriculture and domestic tourism and hospitality sectors, and
target the technical and business skills required to support diversified value
chains in these areas.
23 A coalition for change can include “self conscious, freely-organized, active and lasting alliances of elites,
organizations, and citizens sharing partially overlapping political goals”, Kpundeh, S. (nd), Strategy for Coalitions,
World Bank Institute. It is an approach that forms the basis of a successful partnership between the Australian
Embassy and The Asia Foundation in the Philippines.
42
Leveraging DFAT’s other investments
Finding: Currently there is some interaction between DFAT’s various investments for
workforce development. However, there are significant opportunities to maximise
impact by extending this collaboration through closer working relationships in the future.
Collaboration with TOMAK and MDF are critical to maximising the benefit of SWP through
facilitating access for smallholders to SWP, and on their return supporting further skill
development and opportunities in small-scale commercial agriculture. These two programs
already work together, with the TOMAK design identifying the importance of collaborating
with MDF in the delivery of its major objective of ensuring that “local commercial producers
are partnering sustainably and profitably with agribusiness and service providers in selected
agricultural value chains.” The design document notes that significant opportunities exist
for TOMAK (as a localised program) to address many of the identified obstacles MDF
partner businesses experience and so to complement MDF’s broader agenda. “Synergies
between these programs is much better than parallel delivery mechanisms, while also
offering scope for more efficient use of Australia’s aid budget” (DFAT, 2015). Another lesson
can be drawn from how TOMAK delivers its services. Its approach is to work directly with
the target population, sidestepping but not excluding working through government. As a
TOMAK report on market systems and value chains notes, “capacity within Government
institutions is still evolving and although policy is supportive of commercial agriculture,
strategies to achieve policy objectives remain weak and under-resourced” (TOMAK, 2016).
Existing collaboration between TOMAK and MDF would be further enhanced by linkages
with returned seasonal workers. Providing seasonal workers with appropriate add-on
training while in Australia would further contribute to a strategy of promoting smallholder
commercial agriculture in Timor-Leste. Closer links can also be developed with MDF in
furtherance of small business development in support of small-scale tourism and hospitality
initiatives through the value chain.
Recommendation 11: In a future WDP, DFAT should ensure other GoA
investments are further leveraged for maximum workforce development, in
particular the forthcoming PLF, as well as TOMAK and MDF, to maximise linkages
between labour mobility and development of commercial agriculture and
domestic tourism opportunities.
43
4.5 Key lessons from the current WDPTL
This section addresses KRQ 7.1: What are the key lessons from a review of the
current performance of different elements of DFAT’s workforce development
investments in Timor-Leste?
Finding: A future WDP will need a longer timeframe, of at least five years, with
an option to renew to be effective, and will require a common understanding of
program design and outcomes by the program and implementing partners,
realistic outputs and timeframes, revised governance arrangements, careful
consideration of the balance of long-term advisers (LTA) and short-term advisers
(STA), and a monitoring, evaluation and learning framework (MELF) suited to
collecting evidence of outcomes.
The key lessons from the current WDPTL program can be summarised as follows:
capacity limitations of GoTL partners to undertake agreed activities will restrict program
outcomes, so outputs and timeframes need to be realistic;
extended periods of political instability, such as has occurred during this program,
will reduce counterpart availability and financial commitments;
a common understanding of the program’s design and outcomes between the
program and implementing partners needs to be developed and maintained,
and any cuts to budget need to be fully explained;
careful consideration needs to be given to a balance of LTA and STA in a future
program;
WDPs need to be for a longer duration to enable maximum responsiveness,
and for there to be time to demonstrate fit-for-purpose models;
training participants must be selected carefully to ensure they understand the
requirements of a course and intend to complete and utilise the knowledge.
This can be challenging due to working in partnership with GoTL personnel, who may
have different ideas about suitability of participants and equity considerations;
streamlining the MELF has given sharpened understanding and assisted in improving
data collection methods. Once fully implemented it will support demonstration of
progress towards EOPOs; and
good work to date in GESI can be built upon in the new iteration of the program.
Recommendation 12: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should plan for
a longer-term and more flexible program that is able to respond to emergent
opportunities – of at least five years, with an option to renew.
44
5. Bringing it all together
Workforce development is central to Timor-Leste growing and developing a diversified
non-oil economy that is not overwhelmingly dependent on the public sector.
With a forecast that oil revenues will cease by 2021 (ADB, 2015), this matter becomes
urgent. Timor-Leste is largely uncompetitive in the region due to a low-skilled workforce,
a small private sector, and high labour costs. The private sector remains heavily dependent
on foreign workers for key positions.
The approach taken to this strategic review was to identify sectors with potential to grow
Timor-Leste’s non-oil economy, either through the generation of export revenue or by
producing goods and services that replace imports. We have also identified where past
and future donor investments provide a strong supporting environment for generating
commercial activity, especially in areas of large population.
The greatest source of revenue after oil and aid is through remittances, with one in five
Timorese households receiving payments from overseas. These remittances come from
Timorese participation in the SWP, the South Korea Temporary Workers Program, and
through self-sourcing of work, principally in the UK. However, continuing access to work
in the UK is not guaranteed once the UK leaves the European Union. Yet, remittances,
together with export industries such as coffee and tourism, and the development of
commercial agriculture to enable import substitution, provide some modestly hopeful
prospects.
From the perspective of a Timorese jobseeker, the SWP is the largest source of low-skilled
jobs available in Timor-Leste. The SWP offers work that is highly attractive because it
pays a wage many times higher than the minimum wage in Timor-Leste. If a worker
saves $6,000 from six months work in Australia, this is equivalent to 3.5 years of work in
Timor‑Leste at the minimum wage. No other work opportunity for a low-skilled Timorese
worker can compare to the SWP in terms of generating income rapidly.
Both the WDPTL and LMAP have provided valuable support for the SWP in Timor-Leste,
helping it to grow and meet the increased demand for Timorese workers from Australian
employers. The rapid growth in Timorese employed in Australia through the SWP in 2017
is a major tangible benefit for Timor-Leste in a domestic labour market with low jobs growth.
This is a form of aid from Australia that is increasingly visible in Timor-Leste,
and expectations are that it will increase.
The announcement of more substantial labour mobility opportunities through the PLS that
could be extended to Timor-Leste brought the realisation that Timor-Leste’s TVET and
higher education system is not producing workers with the skills required to take advantage
of them. Timorese people will effectively be in competition with better-qualified people from
Pacific Island countries. Many of the jobs currently being undertaken by foreigners could be
undertaken by Timorese with improved technical and vocational training, but the challenges
in this sector are immense, in large part due to the poor quality of training and its lack of
relevance to employers. This is further complicated by a mistaken belief that Timorese and
Australian qualifications are equivalent. Nonetheless, if this situation could be remedied the
benefits would be substantial.
45
Work undertaken by the current WDPTL in developing qualifications and training
frameworks shows early signs of the benefits of collaboration between Australian training
providers and receptive Timorese training institutions, both in the development of credible
ELT and upgrading hospitality qualifications. It is the view of the review team that given
the benefits that could be realised, it would be timely to build on this good work and
further develop and demonstrate the value of employer-relevant, Australian-standard
TVET qualifications in the hospitality and horticulture area to take advantage of unique
opportunities through the PLS, while also having relevance to developing the domestic
tourism industry, hospitality services and commercial agriculture. Over the long term training
and qualifications to support other aspects of the tourism and commercial agriculture value
chain could be developed, and in time – if a successful model could be demonstrated
– this could be used to drive necessary reforms in Timor-Leste’s own TVET and higher
education sector.
In addition to providing income, opportunities to work in Australia through the SWP and
later the PLS can be leveraged to help address major political and economic issues in
workforce development in Timor-Leste. Three examples were identified. The first is SWP
experience giving Timorese the skills to replace foreign workers. The second is for SWP
workers to leverage their earnings to promote rural development through establishing and
supporting commercial agriculture. The third example of how to increase the benefits of
SWP work is to give Timorese workers the savings to fund further education and qualify to
work in better-paid jobs in Australia for two to three years under the PLS.
SWP work in hospitality offers the chance to not only acquire better English language skills
but customer service skills. A manager of one of Timor-Leste’s major hotels said she was
happy to re-employ three returning SWP workers for six months each year after working
in hospitality in Australia. The hotel benefited from the workers’ improved English skills,
but the bigger benefit was to their customer service skills, which enabled them to engage
with customers and to solve problems. She said hospitality students on work placements
lacked these customer service skills, and management had to put considerable effort into
imparting them through workplace training, with modest results.
Commercial agriculture in upland rural areas is a major focus of government and donor
investment. However, the lack of access to credit to make necessary investments to
buy equipment to improve labour productivity is a major barrier for many smallholder
households. The SWP offers the chance for members of farming households setting
themselves up in commercial horticulture to generate the savings to invest in needed
equipment. Also important is to gain knowledge, skills and attitudes needed for
high-performance work in commercial farming, and access to skills related to commercial
horticulture may provide an even bigger benefit for farming households than the savings
generated by working on the SWP.
Getting the maximum impact from an Australian government investment in workforce
development involves not merely focusing on those sectors which are growing.
It also requires identifying where Australian workforce development funding can have a
greater impact by being linked to other investments in these sectors. The sectors in which
current or planned investment will create new demand for skills are commercial agriculture
in Timor-Leste, tourism and hospitality in Timor-Leste, and short-term and longer-term work
overseas through the SWP and PLS.
In relation to rural development, DFAT investments in TOMAK and MDF and USAID
investments in Avansa Agricultura ensure that commercial agriculture in selected upland
46
areas has considerable potential to grow and benefit the rural poor. Tourism as a growth
sector is not only a priority for the GoTL but is receiving significant support from a USAID
investment in developing rural community-based tourism. Australia’s investment in fostering
short-term opportunities for people from the region to work in Australia through the SWP
is now achieving a good rate of return, with the number of SWP jobs offered expanding to
6,166 in FY 2016–17.
The SWP is one of the key mechanisms for leveraging these investments. The WDP
and LMAP/PLF will have the opportunity to further leverage these benefits through linking
employment opportunity pathways. This requires ensuring that initial selection is from
rural areas where commercial opportunities in horticulture or community tourism exist.
It also requires more extended pre-departure training to identify business investment
opportunities. The work in Australia should also include further relevant skills training.
This could include ELT, skills learnt on the job related to commercial horticulture, or financial
literacy such as elementary book-keeping. On return, support is also needed for the worker
in setting up his or her business or in their efforts to invest in further training to acquired
internationally recognised qualifications.
A recent World Bank (2018a) study of the development impacts of temporary migration
makes recommendations for maximising the development impacts of labour mobility that
are relevant to Timor-Leste. These include ensuring that poorer areas of participating
countries are benefiting from the programme through equal access to information and
support for applying for the SWP, lowering barriers to participation for more remote areas,
and focusing recruitment on unemployed labour.
Bringing about joined-up efforts to maximise workforce development in Timor-Leste will
require not only “programs” but addressing complex and interrelated challenges. GoA and
other investors now realise the benefits of utilising a “coalitions for change” approach to
address complex multi-sector, multi-actor workforce development issues, and this requires
active consideration in the design of a new WDP.
Recommendation 13: In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should utilise a
“coalitions for change” approach to address complex workforce development
issues.
47
6. Recommendations
In a future WDP in Timor-Leste, DFAT should:
Recommendation 1: include an emphasis on quality TVET training in country that can
close existing labour skill gaps currently filled by foreign workers and meet the needs of
prospective domestic and international employers.
Recommendation 2: focus on supporting the acquisition of skills that can contribute to
the development of identified export industries such as coffee, tourism and labour services
and the development of commercial agriculture to enable import substitution. Over the
longer term it will be important to take a broad and responsive view of the technical and
business skills required to support diversified value chains in these areas.
48
Recommendation 3: support initiatives that will position Timor-Leste for improved labour
mobility opportunities. These should include continuing support for the development
of GoTL capacity to manage expanded involvement in the SWP, as well as for the
development of relevant Australian-level qualifications in Timor-Leste suitable for
participation in the PLS. Ideally these skills, or components of them, will also be relevant for
the domestic tourist and commercial agriculture market.
Recommendation 4: deepen the current benefits of the SWP by providing additional
reintegration support to returning seasonal workers to find pathways to employment,
establish businesses, access further training or take advantage of new labour mobility
opportunities.
Recommendation 5: continue to support Australia Awards scholarships and alumni,
explore opportunities for co-funding to increase the availability of scholarships, and
ensure the relevance of qualifications pursued, and consider restoring the emphasis on
undergraduate training.
Recommendation 6: continue to support ELT as a priority and undertake targeted and
independent assessments to strengthen its delivery. These assessments should include
ELT learning outcomes to date, and whether the current standard of English is adequate
for labour mobility, domestic tourism and hospitality purposes. ELT for SWP, AAS, PWD
and TVET trainers should continue, but ELT for secondary school teachers and support
for the UNTL ELC should not. ELT should be integrated into all other program activities as
appropriate and be delivered through existing training institutions, which could be co-funded
by the Government of Australia (GoA), and strengthened through partnerships with institutions
in Australia or Timor-Leste (where those institutions deliver to the Australian standard).
Recommendation 7: continue to support GoTL capacity to analyse and disseminate
labour market information and manage labour mobility programs.
Recommendation 8: demonstrate the value of establishing high-quality Australian-
standard TVET qualifications that respond to international and domestic demand to drive
domestic TVET reform.
Recommendation 9: continue to work with GoTL but put greater emphasis on partnering
with industry, employers and Australian institutions in all areas.
Recommendation 10: greatly increase support for future labour mobility opportunities in
and establish linkages with the commercial agriculture, domestic tourism and hospitality
sectors, and target the technical and business skills required to support diversified value
chains in these areas.
Recommendation 11: ensure other GoA investments are further leveraged for maximum
workforce development, in particular the forthcoming PLS, as well as To’os Ba Moris
Diak (TOMAK – Farming for Prosperity) and the Market Development Facility, to maximise
linkages between labour mobility and development of commercial agriculture and domestic
tourism opportunities.
Recommendation 12: plan for a longer-term and more flexible program that is able to
respond to emergent opportunities – of at least five years, with an option to renew.
Recommendation 13: utilise a “coalitions for change” approach to address complex
workforce development issues.
49
7. Annexes
Annex A: References
ADB, 2015. Growing the non-oil economy: a private sector assessment for Timor-Leste.
Cash, Senator the Honourable Michaelia, 2017 Media Release: ‘New measures to support participation in
the Seasonal Worker Programme’, 8 September 2017.
Curtain, R., M. Dornan, J. Doyle and S. Howes, 2017. Pacific Possible Labour Mobility: the $10 Billion-dollar
prize. Background Paper commissioned by the World Bank for its Pacific Possible Strategy.
DFAT, 2015. Tomak: Farming for Prosperity, Investment Design Document.
DFAT, 2016. Sri Lanka Skills for Inclusive Economic Growth Design Document, May 2016.
DFAT, 2017a. Australia-Pacific Training Coalition Stage 3 (APTC3) Investment Design Document (draft).
DFAT, 2017b. Vanuatu Skills Partnership: Skills for Prosperity Investment Design Document, May 2017.
Francis, S. 2014. Youth training and employment perception study, SEFOPE.
Francis, S. 2016. Employment of MLSTP Graduates Study 2016, SEPFOPE.
Freedman, D. 2015. Labor mobility and development in Timor-Leste, presentation to the Pacific Update
Conference, Suva.
Freedman, D. 2016. Coffee supply chain development and tourism in Timor-Leste, presentation to the Pacific
Update Conference, Suva.
Government of Australia, 2017. 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper.
Government of Timor-Leste, 2011. Strategic Development Plan 2011-2030.
Government of Timor-Leste, 2014. Poverty in Timor-Leste 2014.
Government of Timor-Leste 2015a. Timor-Leste Population and Housing Census.
Government of Timor-Leste, 2015b. Timor-Leste Population and Housing Census Data Sheet.
Government of Timor-Leste, 2016. Business Activity Survey 2016.
Government of Timor-Leste, 2017a. National Employment Policy 2017–2030.
Government of Timor-Leste, 2017b. State Budget Book 4B.
GoTL, 2017c. Prime Minister’s speech: Seminário Internacional Elevar A Qualidade Do Ensino Superior
Como Fator-Chave Para Aumentar A Empregabilidade Dos Graduados, 22 November 2017.
GoTL, 2018a Media Release, Council of Ministers Meeting of 1 March 2018
GoTL, 2018b. Media Release, Council of Ministers Extraordinary Meeting of 5 March 2018.
ILO, 2016. Jobs and structural transformation in Timor-Leste.
IMF, 2017. IMF Country Report No. 17/360 Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste 2017 Article IV
Consultation—Press Release and Staff Report, December 2017.
50
Inder, B. and K. Cornwell, 2016. Private sector-driven development in an infant economy, Monash Centre for
Development Economics and Sustainability Research Paper Series on Timor-Leste RPTL4.
Inder, B. & K. Cornwell, 2017. Labour markets and productivity in Timor-Leste. Research Paper Series on
Timor-Leste RP TL-7, Centre for Development Economics and Sustainability, Monash University.
Leung, F. and Savithiri, R., 2009. Spotlight on focus groups. Canadian Family Physician 55 (2), 218-219.
Market Development Facility (MDF), 2016. Annual Report.
McWilliam, A., 2014. Migration and Rural-Urban Inequalities in Timor-Leste, State, Society and Governance
in Melanesia–In Brief 1/2014, ANU
Schofield, K., Minford, M. and Epstein, A. 2015. Independent evaluation of the Vanuatu Technical and
Vocational Education and Training Sector Strengthening Program, Final Report (Revised), 22 July 2015.
SEJT, 2018a. Enterprise and Skills Survey 2017, GoTL.
SEJT, 2018b. Labour Market Outlook Timor-Leste, Edition 7, February 2018, GoTL.
SEPFOPE, 2014. Tracer Study Technical Training Graduates 2014: A tracer study to evaluate the satisfaction
and employment prospects for graduates of accredited technical training courses in Timor-Leste.
SEPFOPE, 2016. Enterprise and Skills Survey 2016.
Tomak, 2016.Technical Report 1, Market analysis of selected agriculture products.
Urdal, H, 2006. A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence, International Studies Quarterly
50, 607-629.
USAID, 2018. Media Release: USAID and Timor-Leste sign agreement to help Timor-Leste develop an
inclusive tourism industry: three-year project to boost investment, jobs. USAID Development Outreach, Dili,
28 January 2018.
WDPTL, 2016. Gender Equality and Social Inclusion Strategy November 2016
WDPTL, 2017.Workforce Development Program Timor-Leste (2014-2018). Annual Report December
2015-December 2016: Results and Management Overview.
WDPTL, 2018. Workforce Development Program Timor-Leste Annual Report January-December 2017.
Wigglesworth, A. and L. Boxer, 2017. Transitional livelihoods: Timorese migrant workers in the UK,
presentation to the 2017 Australasian Aid conference, Canberra.
Wigglesworth, A. and A. B. dos Santos, 2016. Timorese workers in Australia: A study of seasonal work
experiences, skills and future options. A report of the Reintegration and Tracer Study in Timor-Leste for the
Labour Mobility Assistance Program (LMAP).
Wigglesworth, A. and A.B. dos Santos, 2018. Timorese migrant workers in the Australian Seasonal Worker
Program, unpublished.
World Bank, 2014. Timor-Leste Workforce Development: SABER Country Report.
World Bank, 2018a. Maximizing the development impacts from temporary migration: Recommendations for
Australia’s Seasonal Worker Programme, World Bank Group.
World Bank, 2018b. Systematic Country Diagnostic: Pathways for a new economy and sustainable livelihoods.
51
Annex B: List of consultations
Interviews
STAKEHOLDER GROUP NAME ROLE/POSITION
GoA
Dan Woods Counsellor, Governance & Rural Development
Claire Chivell 1st Secretary
Regan Field 2nd Secretary Aid Management
Paul Regnault 2nd Secretary Rural Development
DFAT Manuel Guimarães Senior Officer, Workforce Development
Francisco de Deus Soares Senior Coordinator, Governance
Tony McGee Director, Education Section (Canberra)
Kate Watson Director, Strategy and Governance Section, Scholarship and Alumni Branch
(Canberra)
GoA PROGRAMS
Sue Smith Team Leader
Anita Delaney Deputy Team Leader
Julie Kean Skills Development & Employment Specialist
WDPTL
Eoghan Walsh Labor Market Information System Expert
Ceri Bryant M&E Adviser
Maria Teresa Braz Gomes STA Alumni Engagement Specialist
Stephen Morris Capacity Building Adviser
LMAP
Lyndon Voight Information and Communication Technology Advisor
Liz Garrett Director Operations
GfD
David Meehan Human Resources Management adviser (Civil Service Commission)
MDF Shariful Islam Country Representative
Richard Holloway Team Leader
TOMAK
Jenny Ikelberg Value Chain Specialist
GoTL
CSC Faustino Cardoso President
Paulo Alves Director-General
Lucio dos Santos Bere Taci National Director for Employment Policy
Jenifer Antonio da Cruz Pui National Director for Labour Information System
Armandio Belo Head of TVET Department, INDMO
SEJT
Belarmino da Cruz Head of Department for Overseas Employment Office
Isabel de Lima Director, INDMO
Paulino Pinto Head of Accreditation Department, INDMO
Agostinho Cabral National Adviser, INDMO
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE,
Cristina Dias Quintas Senior Adviser (2011 intake Alumni)
INDUSTRY AND ENVIRONMENT
Ismenio Martins da Silva Secretary
HCDF
Leila Carceres dos Santos Coordinator Administration, Finance & Internal Human Resources
Maria Elsa Diogo Correia Director-General of Higher Education, Science and Technology
MoE Vasco Viana Director of Higher Education (SMG Member)
Manuel Magno Atoc Director of Teacher Training, INFORDEPE
IADE Bernardinho Menezes Director for Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation
OTHER MULTILATERAL AND BILATERAL
THE WORLD BANK Adelaide Goretti Neves de Camoes Education Specialist
David Freeman Country Economist
Elsty Davidz Morato Social Development Officer
ADB
Agostinho Cabral Project Management Unit Officer
Sarah Francis Consultant, Mid-Level Skills Training Project
INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION
Camilla Rivero-Moldonado Chief of Mission
FOR MIGRATION
GIZ Theo Ebbers Principal Adviser
AVANSA AGRICULTURA PROJECT
Dina Karic Chief of Party
(USAID)
52
STAKEHOLDER GROUP NAME ROLE/POSITION
53
STAKEHOLDER GROUP NAME ROLE/POSITION
OTHER STAKEHOLDERS
EMBASSY OF THE DEMOCRATIC
REPUBLIC OF TIMOR-LESTE, Melissa Denning Assistant Labour Attaché
CANBERRA
CCI-TL Sidonio Freitas Vice President (SMG Member)
MONASH UNIVERSITY Brett Inder Professor,
Natasha Stacey Assistant Professor, Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods
CHARLES DARWIN UNIVERSITY Sally-Anne Hodgetts Manager International Projects and Operations, Office of International Services
Nita Schultz VET Executive Consultant
KONEKTO EMPLOYMENT AGENCY Cristina DaSilva-Cruz Director
CONNECT GROUP Michael Fryszer Managing Director
Alberto Piedade President
ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
Samantha Abel Board Member
54
Disclaimer
This report has been prepared by M&E House for the Australian Government’s Department of Foreign
Affairs and Trade (DFAT). M&E House is implemented by GHD Pty Ltd., in association with Clear Horizon Pty
Ltd. The report may only be used and relied upon by DFAT for the purpose agreed between GHD and DFAT.
GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible.
The services undertaken by M&E House in connection with preparing this report were limited to those
specifically detailed in the report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the report.
The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this report are those of the author/s based on
conditions encountered and information reviewed at the time of preparation of the report.
They do not necessarily reflect the views of DFAT. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the
assumptions being incorrect.
M&E House has no responsibility or obligation to update this report to account for events or changes
occurring after the report was submitted.
M&E House
Suite 2A, Level 2, Seaview Offices
Avenida de Portugal
Dili, Timor-Leste
[email protected] • www.meh.tl
[+670] 7800 9314
MONITOR
EVALUATE
LEARN