27august Abstract
27august Abstract
MASTER OF ENGINEERING
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
With specialization in Structural Engineering
By
MOHD MAHBOOBULLAH
Roll No: 1604-17-741-017
Under the Supervision of
Mr. MOHD NAZIM RAZA
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, CED.
i
DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
MUFFAKHAM JAH COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
AND TECHNOLOGY
BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD-500034,
TELANGANA STATE, INDIA.
OCTOBER– 2019
CERTIFICATE
Mr. Mohd Nazim Raza Dr. Md. Abdullah Shariff Dr. Mohd Hamraj
ii
.
Grade : …………………………
iii
DECLARATION
Place: Hyderabad
(Mohd Mahboobullah)
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Mr. Mohd Nazim Raza,
Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, Muffakham Jah College of
Engineering and Technology. I was privileged to carry out my project under his
guidance. I am grateful for his cooperation and expertise throughout the work.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to Prof. M. Gopal Naik, Professor and
Head of Civil Engineering department, UCE, Osmania University, for his valuable
support and advice for preparation of this thesis as per the format.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to Prof. Mohd Hamraj, Professor and
Head of Civil Engineering department, Muffakham Jah College of Engineering and
Technology, for his valuable support and advice for preparation of this thesis as per
the format.
Sincere gratitude goes to my parents, family members and friends without whose
efforts I could not have been at this stage.
(Mohd Mahboobullah)
v
ABSTRACT
In recent years, there has been a substantial growth in the number of high rise structures.
Traditional slab-beam-column structure were generally consider for the construction of
residential, commercial and office building till recent years. A flat-slab building structure
has major advantages above conventional slab-beam-column structures because of the
free design of space, less construction time, and aesthetical appearance. The performance
of the flat slab structure is poor during earthquake because its Stiffness is less. Its
stiffness can be increase by providing a lateral load resisting system such as shear wall.
Shear wall has major role in design of Earthquake Resistant Structures, which decreases
the structure response when they are subjected to lateral loads.
In the present work, a 15 storied commercial building having flat slab system with and
without shear wall for irregular structure has been model and analysed. Irregularities such
as vertical irregularity and plan irregularity are considered. Comparative studies of these
structures are evaluated on the constraints like base shear, time period, storey
displacements and storey drift. The different location of shear wall is used to study the
effect of changing location. Nonlinear pushover analysis was carried out for the analysis
of structure using the software ETABS.
Keywords: Flat slab, Shear Wall, Irregularity, Non- liner pushover Analysis.
vi
CONTENTS
Page No.
Abstract vi
List of Figures x
Abbreviations xviii
Chapter 1- Introduction 01 – 12
1.1 General 02
vii
Chapter III- Methodology 19 – 26
4.1 General 28
5.1 General 38
viii
5.7 Performance Point 57
References 102-103
ix
List of Figures
x
Vertical Geometric Irregular Building Shear Wall at Mid
4.9 34
Frame (Model-3.3)
Vertical Geometric Irregular Building without Shear Wall
4.10 35
(Model-4.1)
Vertical Geometric Irregular Building with L Type Shear
4.11 35
Wall (Model-4.2)
Vertical Geometric Irregular Building Shear Wall at Mid
4.12 36
Frame (Model-4.3)
xi
5.15 Storey Drift for Model-1.3 45
xii
5.34 Hinge Formation for Model-2.2 in X direction 52
xiii
5.53 Performance Point for Model-1.2 in Y direction 58
xiv
5.72 Performance Point for Model-4.3 in X direction 69
xv
List of Tables
xvi
5.26 Performance Level of L Type Shear Wall Pushover Y Mode-1.2 89
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover X
5.27 89
Model-1.3
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover Y
5.28 90
Model-1.3
5.29 Performance Level of Bare Frame Pushover X Model-2.1 90
5.30 Performance Level of Bare Frame Pushover Y Model-2.1 91
5.31 Performance Level of L Type Shear wall Pushover X Model-2.2 91
5.32 Performance Level of L Type Shear Wall Pushover Y Mode-2.2 92
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover X
5.33 92
Model-2.3
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover Y
5.34 92
Model-2.3
5.35 Performance Level of Bare Frame Pushover X Model-3.1 93
5.36 Performance Level of Bare Frame Pushover Y Model-3.1 93
5.37 Performance Level of L Type Shear wall Pushover X Model-3.2 94
5.38 Performance Level of L Type Shear Wall Pushover Y Mode-3.2 94
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover X
5.39 95
Model-3.3
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover Y
5.40 95
Model-3.3
5.41 Performance Level of Bare Frame Pushover X Model-4.1 96
5.42 Performance Level of Bare Frame Pushover Y Model-4.1 96
5.43 Performance Level of L Type Shear wall Pushover X Model-4.2 97
5.44 Performance Level of L Type Shear Wall Pushover Y Mode-4.2 97
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover X
5.45 97
Model-4.3
Performance Level of Shear Wall at Mid Frame Pushover Y
5.46 98
Model-4.3
xvii
Abbreviations
D Displacement
Sa Spectral acceleration
Sd Spectral displacement
T Time period
K Stiffness Matrix
g Acceleration due to Gravity
SDOF Single Degree of Freedom
MDOF Multi Degree of Freedom
ζ Damping Ratio
ω Fundamental Natural Frequency
A Hard rock
B Medium soil
C Soft soil
xviii