Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Type and Trait
Type and Trait
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In the previous block we studied the concept of personality and various issues related
to it. Now we will two major theories of personality, Type theory and Trait theory of
personality in detail. We will start with trait and type approach and end up with the
Big five Factor model. Different psychologists have approached to explain
personality from different angles. The earliest efforts to explain personality were to
classify people in certain categories and label these categories according to some
commonly shared characteristics. This approach finds mention as early as in 356-
323 B.C. This was followed by trait approach and various other explanations.
1.1 OBJECTIVES
After completing this unit, you will be able to:
l Understand and discuss the concept of type in personality;
l Discuss in your own words Hippocrate’s personality types;
l Discuss in your own words Krestchmer’s personality types;
l Discuss in your own words Sheldon’s personality types;
5
Trait and Type Theories of l Discuss in your own words Jung’s personality types;
Personality
l Discuss in your own words Spranger’s personality types;
l Discuss in your own words Holland’s personality types;
l Evaluate type approach to personality;
l Describe in your own words the trait approach of Allport;
l Understand and discuss Cattell’s and Eysenck’s approach to personality; and
l Differentiate between type and trait approach to personality.
Athletic Type – These are muscular types and have well built muscles and are
neither tall nor short. They have stable and calm nature and are able to adjust
themselves to changes in the environment.
Dyspalstic Type – This category includes people who do not exhibit any of the
characteristics mentioned above but are mix of all three types.
Allport further divided personal traits into three subcategories: a) cardinal dispositions,
b) central dispositions, and c) secondary dispositions.
a) Cardinal dispositions: such traits have overriding and overwhelming influence
on the behaviour of a person in that they manifest themselves in all that a person
does and guides the behaviour of that person. For example, Mahatma Gandhi had
firm belief and conviction in peace and non-violence. Message of peace and non-
violence were explicitly seen in whatever Mahatma Gandhi did in his life, whether at
home or abroad.
b) Central dispositions: This is found in all persons and one can have 5 to 10
central dispositions. These are not equivalent to cardinal traits but one can assess
the personality of an individual in terms of these traits. These traits actually define
the personality of a person. Let us take an example of a person who has the traits of
honesty, punctuality, parsimony, cleanliness and generosity. Such a person will be
always on time to the office, and keep the scheduled meetings on time and never will
waste anyone’s time, will be always straight forward and deal directly with his
employer and employees, and would ensure that nothing is wasted and will make
sure others do not waste anything and when ever someone comes for help would be
generous enough to offer help and solve the problem.
c) Secondary dispositions: These traits of a person are less consistent, less explicit
and less meaningful for the person and hence are called secondary traits. These
traits are of not much help in explaining the personality. For example, hair style,
dressing sense, eating pattern or preferences etc.
Neuroticism
Neuroticism is the name Eysenck gave to a dimension that had persons who tend to
be quite “nervous.” These people tend to suffer more frequently from a variety of
“nervous disorders”, hence the name of the dimension. But it does not mean that
people who score high on the neuroticism scale are necessarily suffering from neurotic
disorders, but it only shows that such persons are relatively more susceptible to
develop neurotic problems as compared to the normal persons.
Eysenck was convinced that this dimension of normality, neuroticism, etc were true
temperaments and they were genetically determined and physiologically supported
dimension of personality. He therefore tried to find possible explanations in the realm
of physiological research. Eysenck hypothesized that some people have a more
responsive sympathetic nervous system than others. Some people remain very calm
during emergencies, while some persons feel considerable fear or other emotions.
Some are terrified by even very minor incident while for some even major accidents
do not disturb them. Eysenck suggested that the former group had a problem of
sympathetic hyperactivity, which made them vulnerable to develop neurotic disorders.
Perhaps the most “archetypal” neurotic symptom is the panic attack. Eysenck
explained panic attacks as something like the positive feedback you get when you
place a microphone too close to a speaker. The small sounds entering the mike get
amplified and come out of the speaker, and go into the mike, get amplified again,
and come out of the speaker again, and so on, round and round, until you get the
famous squeal that we all love to produce when we were kids. (Lead guitarists like
to do this too to make some of their long, wailing sounds.)
Well, the panic attack follows the same pattern: You are mildly frightened by
something, as for example, crossing a bridge. This gets your sympathetic nervous
system activated, causing you to become more nervous, and so more susceptible to
stimulation, which gets your system even more in an uproar, which makes you more
nervous and more susceptible. You could say that the neurotic person is responding
more to his or her own panic than to the original object of fear!
Extraversion-introversion
His second dimension is extraversion-introversion. By this he means something very
similar to what Jung meant by the same terms, and something very similar to our
common sense understanding of them, that is Shy, quiet people “versus” out-going,
loud people. This dimension, too, is found in everyone, but the physiological
explanation is a bit more complex. According to Eysenck, extraversion-introversion
is a matter of the balance of “inhibition” and “excitation” in the brain itself. Excitation
is the brain waking itself up, getting into an alert, learning state.
Inhibition is the brain calming itself down, either in the usual sense of relaxing and
going to sleep, or in the sense of protecting itself in the case of overwhelming
stimulation.
Thus someone who is extraverted, he hypothesized, has good, strong inhibition:
When confronted by traumatic stimulation — such as a car crash — the extravert’s
brain inhibits itself, which means that it becomes “numb,” you might say, to the
trauma, and therefore will remember very little of what happened. After the car 13
Trait and Type Theories of crash, the extravert might feel as if he had “blanked out” during the event, and may
Personality
ask others to fill them in on what happened. Because they don’t feel the full mental
impact of the crash, they may be ready to go back to driving the very next day.
The introvert, on the other hand, has poor or weak inhibition: When trauma, such as
the car crash, hits them, their brains don’t protect them fast enough, don’t in any
way shut down. Instead, they are highly alert and learn well, and so remember
everything that happened. They might even report that they saw the whole crash “in
slow motion!” They are very unlikely to want to drive anytime soon after the crash,
and may even stop driving altogether.
Psychoticism
Eysenck recognised a third factor which he labeled as psychotic. Like neuroticism,
high psychotic trait does not mean that a person is psychotic but only that one
exhibits some qualities commonly found among psychotics, and that one is more
susceptible to becoming psychotic. Psychotic people include a certain recklessness,
a disregard for common sense or conventions, and a degree of inappropriate
emotional expression. It is the dimension that separates those people who end up in
institutions from the rest.
16