Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sandmann v. Washington Post - Order Reopening Case - 10-28-2019
Sandmann v. Washington Post - Order Reopening Case - 10-28-2019
VS. ORDER
under Rule 59, and for leave to amend the complaint. (Doc. 49).
2). Defendant has opposed this motion (Doc. 50), and plaintiff
Complaint and set forth in the chart attached to the Court’s July
to these statements except Statements 10, 11, and 33, to the extent
that the Court has given this matter careful review and concludes
statements and their context. The Court will then consider them
The Court also notes that the proposed First Amended Complaint
1 The Court has reviewed the videos filed by both parties and they
confirm this conclusion.
2
Case: 2:19-cv-00019-WOB-CJS Doc #: 64 Filed: 10/28/19 Page: 3 of 5 - Page ID#: 862
IT IS ORDERED that:
discussion;
2 The Court notes that defendant has acknowledged that the
“blocking” statement concerned plaintiff. (Doc. 61 at 2).
3
Case: 2:19-cv-00019-WOB-CJS Doc #: 64 Filed: 10/28/19 Page: 4 of 5 - Page ID#: 863
summary judgment.
4
Case: 2:19-cv-00019-WOB-CJS Doc #: 64 Filed: 10/28/19 Page: 5 of 5 - Page ID#: 864
Cir. 2006).
5