Legal Framework of Land Reform in India
Legal Framework of Land Reform in India
Immediately after Independence, land reform occupied centre-stage in Indian policy as it was
considered essential for the process of nation building. In the current neo-liberal framework
of economic development, land reform has unfortunately taken a back seat. However, with
the recent trend across the continent, of increasing landlessness and protests, both violent
and otherwise, against the government’s attitude, it is necessary to bring land reform agenda
back on the table.
The Constitution embodies the need for land reform in the Directive Principles of State
Policy. Article 39(b) explicitly highlights the need of the state to ensure “that the ownership
and control of material resources of the community are so distributed as best to subserve the
common good.” Among other things, Part IV also emphasizes upon securing to all citizens
an adequate means of livelihood and a decent standard of living. Land reforms legislations
have been placed in the ninth schedule to guarantee their speedy implementation.
assistance of the civil society groups to create cooperatives for transfer of technology and
promotion of entrepreneurship. Periodic assessments are carried out by research groups to
determine the effectiveness of the CARL and the CARP (Comprehensive Agrarian Reform
Programme).
Unfortunately, almost everywhere, land reform has met with strong resistance from the
landed elite. During the Tebhaga movement in West Bengal, the resistance to amendments
in the Bengal Tenancy Act was so great, that the government had to abandon the project1.
Enormous political will is the key to attaining fruition of the land reform agenda. Andhra
Pradesh, where land reform is being pursued with renewed vigour since 2005, with an
unprecedented efficiency and transparency, is a brilliant example of what political will can
achieve.
Experience further shows that simply redistributing land from the rich to the poor may not be
enough to attain the objective of a more egalitarian rural society. First, an important
1
D. Bandhopadyay, Tebhaga Movement in Bengal: A Retrospect, Economic and Political Weekly, 13
October 2001.
problem that must be dealt with is the protection of the redistributed land against land-grab.
Often, due to greater bargaining power and the use of muscle power, landowners have been
able to regain the land allotted to the farmers, either through sale or through force.
therefore, land reform law cannot stop only at redistribution of the land, but must also ensure
their security.
Secondly, the land that is redistributed may not be sufficient to meet the basic needs of those
who have newly acquired it. For instance, Ekta Parishad reports that in many cases where
land was allotted to SC/ST families, the land was useless because either the plot belonged to
somebody else or was on stony, infertile land. Thus, any land reform measure must aim to
procure ‘secure and productive’ land and redistribution rights. A bottom up approach is
necessary for success in land reform. Legislators must ensure participation of the farmers in
deciding boundaries, noting claims and complaints and recording opinions and objectives of
the village members. In Madhya Pradesh, the formation of district-level task forces to settle
land related grievances greatly aided the reform process. In Kerala, the government officers
went to the villages and spoke to the farmers to verify boundaries; in West Bengal the
government conducted camps to spread awareness and familiarise them with official
procedures.
To summarize, Land reform is the major step of government to assist people living under
adverse conditions. It is basically redistribution of land from those who have excess of land
to those who do not possess with the objective of increasing the income and bargaining
power of the rural poor. The purpose of land reform is to help weaker section of society and
do justice in land distribution. Government land policies are implemented to make more
rational use of the scarce land resources by affecting conditions of holdings, imposing
ceilings and grounds on holdings so that cultivation can be done in the most economical
manner.
It is time we thought seriously of land reforms when especially a "humble farmer" is on top.
If in the new century we still talk of reforms without effective implementation we will surely
miss the bus.
Hikmat Ali Khan v. Ishwar Prasad Arya and Others, AIR 1997 SC 864
Supreme Court B
Rape mu sodbhfdn
Pake m dakd