Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jo vs. NLRC
Jo vs. NLRC
GASPER
COMPILATION OF PARTNERSHIP CASES
JO VS. NLRC
324 SCRA 20 October 4, 2000
FACTS:
Peter Mejila worked as barber on a piece rate basis at Dina's Barber Shop. In 1970, the owner, Dina
Tan, sold the barbershop to petitioners Paz Martin Jo and Cesar Jo. All the employees, including
private respondent, were absorbed by the new owners. The name of the barbershop was changed to
Windfield Barber Shop. The owners and the barbers shared in the earnings of the barber shop. The
barbers got two-thirds (2/3) of the fee paid for every haircut or shaving job done, while one-third (1/3)
went to the owners of the shop.
Private respondent left his job voluntarily because of his misunderstanding with his co-worker and
demanded separation pay and other monetary benefits. Petitioner’s contends that respondent was not
their employee but their “partner in trade” whose compensation was based on a sharing arrangement
per haircut or shaving job done.
ISSUE:
HELD:
Absent a clear showing that petitioners and private respondent had intended to pursue a relationship
of industrial partnership, we entertain no doubt that private respondent was employed by petitioners
as caretaker-barber.